Jump to content

Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Corrected to the plural.
No edit summary
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|1985 book by Chantal Mouffe and Ernesto Laclau}}
{{use dmy dates|date=June 2023}}
{{Infobox book
{{Infobox book
| name = Hegemony and Socialist Strategy
| name = Hegemony and Socialist Strategy
| image = HegSoc.jpg
| image = HegSoc.jpg
| caption = Cover to the 2nd Edition
| caption = Cover to the 2nd Edition
| authors = [[Chantal Mouffe]] and [[Ernesto Laclau]]
| authors = {{Nowrap|[[Chantal Mouffe]] and [[Ernesto Laclau]]}}
| country = United Kingdom
| country = United Kingdom
| language = English
| language = English
Line 19: Line 21:
}}
}}


'''''Hegemony and Socialist Strategy''''' is a 1985 work of [[political theory]] in the [[post-Marxism|post-Marxist]] tradition by [[Ernesto Laclau]] and [[Chantal Mouffe]]. Developing several sharp divergences from the tenets of canonical Marxist thought, the authors begin by tracing historically varied [[discourse|discursive]] constitutions of [[Social class|class]], political identity, and social self-understanding, and then tie these to the contemporary importance of [[hegemony]] as a destabilized [[Analytic induction|analytic]] which avoids the traps of various procedures Mouffe and Laclau feel constitute a foundational flaw in Marxist thought: essentializations of class identity, the use of ''a priori'' interpretative paradigms with respect to history and contextualization, the privileging of the [[Base and superstructure|base/superstructure]] binary above other explicative models.
'''''Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics''''' is a 1985 work of [[political theory]] in the [[post-Marxist]] tradition by [[Ernesto Laclau]] and [[Chantal Mouffe]]. Developing several sharp divergences from the tenets of canonical Marxist thought, the authors begin by tracing historically varied [[discourse|discursive]] constitutions of [[Social class|class]], political identity, and social self-understanding, and then tie these to the contemporary importance of [[hegemony]] as a destabilized [[Analytic induction|analytic]] which avoids the traps of various procedures Mouffe and Laclau feel constitute a foundational flaw in Marxist thought: essentializations of class identity, the use of ''a priori'' interpretative paradigms with respect to history and contextualization, the privileging of the [[Base and superstructure|base/superstructure]] binary above other explicative models.


==Organization==
==Organization==
Line 25: Line 27:


== Reception ==
== Reception ==
''Hegemony and Socialist Strategy'' was greeted with positive reviews and has become a reference point in its field; for example, Marxist philosopher [[Slavoj Žižek]] cited ''Hegemony and Socialist Strategy'' as a work having influenced his book, ''[[The Sublime Object of Ideology]]''.<ref name="lacan.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.lacan.com/zizek-signifier.htm|title=Slavoj Zizek: What is a Master-Signifier|last=Butler|first=Rex|publisher=lacan.com|accessdate=30 June 2010}}</ref> Furthermore, its resolutely "post-Marxist" self-definition marks it as one of the first major texts associated with this disciplinary development. A new edition was published in 2001, which included a preface by the authors in which they reaffirmed their commitment to the arguments made in 1985.
''Hegemony and Socialist Strategy'' was greeted with positive reviews and has become a reference point in its field; for example, Marxist philosopher [[Slavoj Žižek]] cited ''Hegemony and Socialist Strategy'' as a work having influenced his book, ''[[The Sublime Object of Ideology]]''.<ref name="lacan.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.lacan.com/zizek-signifier.htm|title=Slavoj Zizek: What is a Master-Signifier|last=Butler|first=Rex|publisher=lacan.com|accessdate=30 June 2010|archive-date=26 November 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101126101618/http://lacan.com//zizek-signifier.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> Furthermore, its resolutely "post-Marxist" self-definition marks it as one of the first major texts associated with this disciplinary development. A new edition was published in 2001, which included a preface by the authors in which they reaffirmed their commitment to the arguments made in 1985.


The concept had a great influence on the [[Social Movement Theory|theory of social movements]] and [[Postcolonialism|post-colonial research]]<ref>International encyclopedia of the social sciences. Vol. 6 / William A. Darity, Jr., editor in chief. — Detroit: Macmillan Reference, USA, 2008. — P. 396</ref> and actually marked emergence of [[post-Marxism]] as a direction in social sciences.<ref>The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology / (Ed.) George Ritzer. — Oxford, etc: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2009. {{ISBN|978-1-4051-2433-1}}</ref> The work also inspired the political movements [[Podemos (Spanish political party)|Podemos]] and ''[[La France insoumise]]''.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/3037-chantal-mouffe-the-philosopher-who-inspires-jean-luc-melenchon|title=Chantal Mouffe, the philosopher who inspires Jean-Luc Mélenchon|work=Versobooks.com|access-date=2017-04-14}}</ref>
The concept had a great influence on the [[Social Movement Theory|theory of social movements]] and [[Postcolonialism|post-colonial research]]<ref>International encyclopedia of the social sciences. Vol. 6 / William A. Darity, Jr., editor in chief. — Detroit: Macmillan Reference, USA, 2008. — P. 396</ref> and marked the emergence of [[post-Marxism]] in the social sciences.<ref>The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology / (Ed.) George Ritzer. — Oxford, etc: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2009. {{ISBN|978-1-4051-2433-1}}</ref> The work also inspired the political movements [[Podemos (Spanish political party)|Podemos]] and ''[[La France insoumise]]''.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/3037-chantal-mouffe-the-philosopher-who-inspires-jean-luc-melenchon|title=Chantal Mouffe, the philosopher who inspires Jean-Luc Mélenchon|work=Versobooks.com|access-date=2017-04-14|archive-date=2017-04-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170415013016/http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/3037-chantal-mouffe-the-philosopher-who-inspires-jean-luc-melenchon|url-status=live}}</ref>


[[Norman Geras]], in a [[New Left Review|New Left]] Article titled 'Post-Marxism?', lambasted Lacau and Mouffe for what he regarded as shallow [[obscurantism]] grounded on basic misunderstandings of both Marx and Marxism. After Laclau's and Mouffe's response to Geras' paper (in 'Post-Marxism without apologies'), Geras doubled down with 'Ex-Marxism Without Substance: Being A Real Reply to Laclau and Mouffe' in which he further criticised the post-Marxist turn.
[[Norman Geras]], in a ''[[New Left Review]]'' article titled "Post-Marxism?", lambasted Laclau and Mouffe for what he regarded as shallow [[obscurantism]] grounded on basic misunderstandings of both Marx and Marxism. After Laclau's and Mouffe's response to Geras' paper (in "Post-Marxism without apologies"), Geras doubled down with "Ex-Marxism Without Substance: Being A Real Reply to Laclau and Mouffe" in which he further criticised the post-Marxist turn.

⚫
== References ==
⚫
{{reflist}}


==Bibliography==
==Bibliography==
Line 40: Line 45:
* ''Howarth, David and Jacob Torfing (eds).'' Discourse Theory in European Politics. — Houndmills: Palgrave, 2005.
* ''Howarth, David and Jacob Torfing (eds).'' Discourse Theory in European Politics. — Houndmills: Palgrave, 2005.
* ''Torfing, Jacob.'' New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe, Žižek. — Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.
* ''Torfing, Jacob.'' New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe, Žižek. — Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.
* ''Jacobs, Thomas.'' The Dislocated Universe of Laclau and Mouffe: An Introduction to Post-Structuralist Discourse Theory — Critical Review 30(3-4), 2018.


{{Chantal Mouffe}}
⚫
== References ==
⚫
{{reflist}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Hegemony And Socialist Strategy}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hegemony And Socialist Strategy}}
[[Category:1985 books]]
[[Category:1985 non-fiction books]]
[[Category:Philosophy books]]
[[Category:Books about socialism]]
[[Category:Books about cultural hegemony]]
[[Category:Books about cultural hegemony]]
[[Category:Books by Ernesto Laclau]]
[[Category:Books by Ernesto Laclau]]
[[Category:Books by Chantal Mouffe]]
[[Category:Books by Chantal Mouffe]]
[[Category:Collaborative non-fiction books]]
[[Category:Works about Marxism]]

Latest revision as of 15:42, 11 September 2024

Hegemony and Socialist Strategy
Cover to the 2nd Edition
AuthorsChantal Mouffe and Ernesto Laclau
LanguageEnglish
SubjectPolitical theory
PublisherVerso (New Left)
Publication date
1985
Publication placeUnited Kingdom
Media typePrint (hardcover and paperback)
Pages197 (first edition)
ISBN0860910679 (Verso)
OCLC67440480

Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics is a 1985 work of political theory in the post-Marxist tradition by Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe. Developing several sharp divergences from the tenets of canonical Marxist thought, the authors begin by tracing historically varied discursive constitutions of class, political identity, and social self-understanding, and then tie these to the contemporary importance of hegemony as a destabilized analytic which avoids the traps of various procedures Mouffe and Laclau feel constitute a foundational flaw in Marxist thought: essentializations of class identity, the use of a priori interpretative paradigms with respect to history and contextualization, the privileging of the base/superstructure binary above other explicative models.

Organization

[edit]

The book is divided into four chapters (~50 pages each). The first two chapters deal with conceptual developments in the manner of an intellectual history, albeit with much more of an eye to disputation and intervention than traditional intellectual history employs. Specifically, Chapter 1 discusses the work of Rosa Luxemburg, Karl Kautsky, Eduard Bernstein, and Georges Sorel (among other texts by major thinkers in the Marxist tradition). Chapter 2's discussion of Gramsci's conception of cultural hegemony is followed by Chapter 3's more politicized development of Laclau and Mouffe's own arguments regarding hegemony's character and constitution. Finally, the fourth chapter argues for the relevance of hegemony as an analytic for the understanding and governance of contemporary politics, political engagement, and self-understanding on the Left.

Reception

[edit]

Hegemony and Socialist Strategy was greeted with positive reviews and has become a reference point in its field; for example, Marxist philosopher Slavoj Žižek cited Hegemony and Socialist Strategy as a work having influenced his book, The Sublime Object of Ideology.[1] Furthermore, its resolutely "post-Marxist" self-definition marks it as one of the first major texts associated with this disciplinary development. A new edition was published in 2001, which included a preface by the authors in which they reaffirmed their commitment to the arguments made in 1985.

The concept had a great influence on the theory of social movements and post-colonial research[2] and marked the emergence of post-Marxism in the social sciences.[3] The work also inspired the political movements Podemos and La France insoumise.[4]

Norman Geras, in a New Left Review article titled "Post-Marxism?", lambasted Laclau and Mouffe for what he regarded as shallow obscurantism grounded on basic misunderstandings of both Marx and Marxism. After Laclau's and Mouffe's response to Geras' paper (in "Post-Marxism without apologies"), Geras doubled down with "Ex-Marxism Without Substance: Being A Real Reply to Laclau and Mouffe" in which he further criticised the post-Marxist turn.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Butler, Rex. "Slavoj Zizek: What is a Master-Signifier". lacan.com. Archived from the original on 26 November 2010. Retrieved 30 June 2010.
  2. ^ International encyclopedia of the social sciences. Vol. 6 / William A. Darity, Jr., editor in chief. — Detroit: Macmillan Reference, USA, 2008. — P. 396
  3. ^ The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology / (Ed.) George Ritzer. — Oxford, etc: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2009. ISBN 978-1-4051-2433-1
  4. ^ "Chantal Mouffe, the philosopher who inspires Jean-Luc Mélenchon". Versobooks.com. Archived from the original on 15 April 2017. Retrieved 14 April 2017.

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Smith, Anna Marie. Laclau and Mouffe: The Radical Democratic Imaginary. — London: Routledge, 1998.
  • Howarth, David. Discourse. — Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 2000.
  • Philips, Louise, Jorgensen, Marianne. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. — London: Sage, 2002.
  • Howarth, David, Aletta Norval and Yannis Stavrakakis (eds). Discourse Theory and Political Analysis. — Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002.
  • Critchley, Simon and Oliver Marchart (eds). Laclau: A Critical Reader. — London: Routledge, 2004.
  • Breckman, Warren. Adventures of the Symbolic: Postmarxism and Radical Democracy. — New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.
  • Howarth, David and Jacob Torfing (eds). Discourse Theory in European Politics. — Houndmills: Palgrave, 2005.
  • Torfing, Jacob. New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe, Žižek. — Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.
  • Jacobs, Thomas. The Dislocated Universe of Laclau and Mouffe: An Introduction to Post-Structuralist Discourse Theory — Critical Review 30(3-4), 2018.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Hegemony_and_Socialist_Strategy&oldid=1245193964"