Jump to content

Talk:Internet meme/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
|-
|-
| '''[[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|Criteria]]:'''<!--
| '''[[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|Criteria]]:'''<!--
--> 1a. '''prose ({{GAList/check|? }})'''<!--
--> 1a. '''prose ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 1b. '''[[MOS:|MoS]] ({{GAList/check|? }})'''<!--
--> 1b. '''[[WP:MOS|MoS]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 2a. '''[[MOS:NOTES|ref layout]] ({{GAList/check|n }})'''<!--
--> 2a. '''[[MOS:NOTES|ref layout]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 2b. '''cites [[WP:RS]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 2b. '''cites [[WP:RS]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 2c. '''no [[WP:OR]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 2c. '''no [[WP:OR]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
Line 70: Line 70:
:*:::Another ping {{u|GenericWikiUser1}}. [[User:AryKun|AryKun]] ([[User talk:AryKun|talk]]) 14:20, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
:*:::Another ping {{u|GenericWikiUser1}}. [[User:AryKun|AryKun]] ([[User talk:AryKun|talk]]) 14:20, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
:*::::Yep I’m working on it, thanks. [[User:GenericWikiUser1|GenericWikiUser1]] ([[User talk:GenericWikiUser1|talk]]) 15:49, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
:*::::Yep I’m working on it, thanks. [[User:GenericWikiUser1|GenericWikiUser1]] ([[User talk:GenericWikiUser1|talk]]) 15:49, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
:*::::: {{u|AryKun}} The page numbers should all be short enough now, let me know if I missed any! [[User:GenericWikiUser1|GenericWikiUser1]] ([[User talk:GenericWikiUser1|talk]]) 12:32, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
:*::::::All right, they're all good, will pass the article now. [[User:AryKun|AryKun]] ([[User talk:AryKun|talk]]) 14:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:32, 11 September 2024

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 15:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
  • Will do. AryKun (talk) 15:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry for the delay in reviewing this.
  • I have removed duplinks and linked several terms I thought might benefit from linking; feel free to discuss.
  • "They appear in a...with copyright" the two clauses aren't related to each other, just split this into two sentences.
  • "Lastly, a meme's...the Internet itself" not exactly clear on what this sentence is trying to say.
  • "emoticon ":-)" introduced" should be "emoticon ":-)", introduced"
  • "LOLcats" is inconsistently capitalized.
  • doujin should be in a lang template.
  • "such as rickrolling" Our article on the meme capitalizes Rickrolling.
  • "additional vessels for" Vessel? Medium would be a better word.
  • "was damaged by...he Zodiac Killer" Might wanna clarify that this was due to the general implication of him being creepy, not because anyone actually though he ws the Zodiac Killer.
  • "Gabrielle et al." Mention who she is (as in profession, type of scientist, etc)
  • Add inflation templates for the amounts in "Non-fungible tokens".
  • Earwig is clear.
  • References seem to be to reliable sources and correctly formatted.
  • Most of the journal and book references need cites to specific pages; pages ranges that include 30 or 40 pages are way too large.
  • I don't think that "— What does dank meme mean?" should be part of the Dictionary.com ref title.
  • Spotchecks: All checked sources verify all claims made.
    • Griffin, Annaliese (March 9, 2018). "What does "dank" mean? A definition of everyone's new favourite adjective". Quartz.
    • Plaugic, Lizzie (January 10, 2017). "How a group of Redditors is creating a fake stock market to figure out the value of memes". The Verge.
    • Hathaway, Jay (November 5, 2018). "The 'E' meme shows just how weird memes can get". The Daily Dot.
    • Lee, Bruce Y. (December 2, 2018). "They Did Surgery On A Grape: What Is This New Viral Meme?". Forbes.
    • Whitten, Sarah (January 4, 2017). "A Wendy's tweet just went viral for all the wrong reasons". CNBC.
    • Victor, Daniel (August 19, 2019). "Hong Kong Protesters Love Pepe the Frog. No, They're Not Alt-Right". The New York Times.
    • Msughter, Aondover Eric; Iman, Maryam Lawal (March 15, 2020). "Internet Meme as a Campaign Tool to the Fight against Covid-19 in Nigeria" (PDF). Global Journal of Human-Social Science.
    • Fazio, Marie (April 29, 2021). "The World Knows Her as 'Disaster Girl.' She Just Made $500,000 Off the Meme". The New York Times.
  • Images are correctly licensed and used, and illustrate the article well.
  • The first sentence in "Modern memes" is slightly sandwiched, move the deep-fried meme a couple lines lower.
  • That's all I have. AryKun (talk) 15:55, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]