Jump to content

Talk:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Progress check
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==GA Review==
==GA Review==
{{atopg
| status =
| result = Passed. [[User:Reconrabbit|<span style="color:#6BAD2D">Recon</span>]][[User talk:Reconrabbit|<span style="color:#2F3833">rabbit</span>]] 01:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
}}
{{Good article tools}}
{{Good article tools}}
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>

'''Nominator:''' {{User|Magentic Manifestations}} 10:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Reconrabbit|Reconrabbit]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Reconrabbit|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Reconrabbit|contribs]]) 14:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Reconrabbit|Reconrabbit]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Reconrabbit|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Reconrabbit|contribs]]) 14:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)


<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
:@[[User:Reconrabbit|Reconrabbit]] Thanks for taking it up. Will address the comments as they come! [[User:Magentic Manifestations|Magentic Manifestations]] ([[User talk:Magentic Manifestations|talk]]) 15:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I copy-edited some minor things for clarity and grammar last week, and since no one else has started a review I will do it now.
Hello, I copy-edited some minor things for clarity and grammar last week, and since no one else has started a review I will do it now.


=== Prose ===
=== Prose ===
* Lead provides a concise summary of the article's topics. {{Tick}}
* Lead provides a concise summary of the article's topics. {{Tick}}
* Following the initial copy-edit, there are no contradictory or confusing sentences I've found. {{Tick}}


=== References ===
=== References ===
Line 15: Line 24:
* External links appropriate. {{Tick}}
* External links appropriate. {{Tick}}
* No copyright violations found, version is distinct from other language Wikipedias. {{Tick}}
* No copyright violations found, version is distinct from other language Wikipedias. {{Tick}}
Sources check, numbers based on [[Special:PermanentLink/1233525114|this revision]]:
Sources check:
{{Columns-list|
{{Columns-list|
* [1] {{Tick}}
*
* [2] {{Tick}}
* [5] {{Mby}} <s>Date given is inconsistent and the source for this information does not look great. 1975 looks to be the correct year which agrees with [https://wildlife.odisha.gov.in/crocodileconservation this site] and [6].</s> {{blue|Modified the source}}
* [6] {{Tick}}
* [13] {{Tick}}
* [37] {{Tick}}
* [47] {{Mby}} <s>Not a very strong source, primary research only cited once. There is a possible better reference from C. J. Stevenson [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269286880_Conservation_of_the_Indian_Gharial_Gavialis_gangeticus_successes_and_failures_Indian_Gharial_Conservation_Successes_and_Failures here].</s> {{blue|Added the source}}
* [57] {{Cross}} <s>Self-published source on a blog. Better references are available.</s> {{blue|Removed the source and tweaked the sentence}}
* [77] {{Tick}}
}}
}}


=== Images ===
=== Images ===
* All images are tagged with licenses. {{Tick}}
* All images are tagged with licenses. {{Tick}}
* {{Mby}} The infobox and caption states that the location is abbreviated "CrocBank" but this is never stated in the article or with a reference.
* {{Mby}} <s>The infobox and caption states that the location is abbreviated "CrocBank" but this is never stated in the article or with a reference.</s> {{blue|resolved}}
* {{Mby}} There are a lot of images, and one of the two pictures of the reptile demonstration building could be removed.
* {{Mby}} <s>There are a lot of images, and one of the two pictures of the reptile demonstration building could be removed.</s> {{blue|removed one of the RDC images}}


=== Stability, neutrality, focus ===
=== Stability, neutrality, focus ===
Line 29: Line 46:
* Article is written from a neutral point of view, and is not promotional of the topic. {{Tick}}
* Article is written from a neutral point of view, and is not promotional of the topic. {{Tick}}
* Broadly covers relevant information to the subject. {{Tick}}
* Broadly covers relevant information to the subject. {{Tick}}
* {{Mby}} The information on reptile stock may be too detailed and not generally useful to a reader. Is this kind of list standard in other wildlife conservation area articles?
* {{Mby}} The information on reptile stock may be too detailed and not generally useful to a reader. Is this kind of list standard in other wildlife conservation area articles? {{blue|Referring to GAs of similar zoo articles (Very few are there!), there is a sea of blue i.e. laundry list of exhibits mentioned. There are no exact count of each animal species though. I am indifferent here. We can probably go with a list if the count seems to be too much data. Thanks!}}
*: I was viewing it on a very wide screen before. It looks better with smaller aspect ratio. It's doing no harm keeping it in and doesn't go against [[MOS:TABLE]]. It's out of the scope of this review. [[User:Reconrabbit|<span style="color:#6BAD2D">Recon</span>]][[User talk:Reconrabbit|<span style="color:#2F3833">rabbit</span>]] 01:02, 10 July 2024 (UTC)


{| border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10" align="center"
{| border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10" align="center"
Line 37: Line 55:
|-
|-
| '''[[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|Criteria]]:'''<!--
| '''[[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|Criteria]]:'''<!--
--> 1a. '''prose ({{GAList/check| }})'''<!--
--> 1a. '''prose ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 1b. '''[[MOS:|MoS]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 1b. '''[[WP:MOS|MoS]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 2a. '''[[MOS:NOTES|ref layout]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 2a. '''[[MOS:NOTES|ref layout]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 2b. '''cites [[WP:RS]] ({{GAList/check| }})'''<!--
--> 2b. '''cites [[WP:RS]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 2c. '''no [[WP:OR]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 2c. '''no [[WP:OR]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 2d. '''no [[WP:CV]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''
--> 2d. '''no [[WP:CV]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''
Line 48: Line 66:
|<!--
|<!--
--> 3a. '''broadness ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 3a. '''broadness ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 3b. '''focus ({{GAList/check|? }})'''<!--
--> 3b. '''focus ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 4. '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 4. '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 5. '''[[WP:EW|stable]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 5. '''[[WP:EW|stable]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 6a. '''[[WP:IUP|free or tagged images]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 6a. '''[[WP:IUP|free or tagged images]] ({{GAList/check|y }})'''<!--
--> 6b. '''pics relevant ({{GAList/check|? }})'''
--> 6b. '''pics relevant ({{GAList/check|y }})'''
|-
|-
| <small><em>Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the [[WP:GACR|Good Article criteria]]. Criteria marked [[Image:Symbol comment 2.png|14px]] are unassessed</em></small>
| <small><em>Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the [[WP:GACR|Good Article criteria]]. Criteria marked [[Image:Symbol comment 2.png|14px]] are unassessed</em></small>
|}
|}
|}
|}
{{abot}}

Latest revision as of 17:33, 11 September 2024

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Magentic Manifestations (talk · contribs) 10:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Reconrabbit (talk · contribs) 14:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reconrabbit Thanks for taking it up. Will address the comments as they come! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 15:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I copy-edited some minor things for clarity and grammar last week, and since no one else has started a review I will do it now.

Prose

[edit]
  • Lead provides a concise summary of the article's topics. checkY
  • Following the initial copy-edit, there are no contradictory or confusing sentences I've found. checkY

References

[edit]
  • References are formatted correctly. checkY
  • External links appropriate. checkY
  • No copyright violations found, version is distinct from other language Wikipedias. checkY

Sources check, numbers based on this revision:

  • [1] checkY
  • [2] checkY
  • [5] Orange tickY Date given is inconsistent and the source for this information does not look great. 1975 looks to be the correct year which agrees with this site and [6]. Modified the source
  • [6] checkY
  • [13] checkY
  • [37] checkY
  • [47] Orange tickY Not a very strong source, primary research only cited once. There is a possible better reference from C. J. Stevenson here. Added the source
  • [57] ☒N Self-published source on a blog. Better references are available. Removed the source and tweaked the sentence
  • [77] checkY

Images

[edit]
  • All images are tagged with licenses. checkY
  • Orange tickY The infobox and caption states that the location is abbreviated "CrocBank" but this is never stated in the article or with a reference. resolved
  • Orange tickY There are a lot of images, and one of the two pictures of the reptile demonstration building could be removed. removed one of the RDC images

Stability, neutrality, focus

[edit]
  • There are no edit wars, content disputes in the article's recent history. No maintenance tags on the article either. checkY
  • Article is written from a neutral point of view, and is not promotional of the topic. checkY
  • Broadly covers relevant information to the subject. checkY
  • Orange tickY The information on reptile stock may be too detailed and not generally useful to a reader. Is this kind of list standard in other wildlife conservation area articles? Referring to GAs of similar zoo articles (Very few are there!), there is a sea of blue i.e. laundry list of exhibits mentioned. There are no exact count of each animal species though. I am indifferent here. We can probably go with a list if the count seems to be too much data. Thanks!
    I was viewing it on a very wide screen before. It looks better with smaller aspect ratio. It's doing no harm keeping it in and doesn't go against MOS:TABLE. It's out of the scope of this review. Reconrabbit 01:02, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.