Jump to content

Argument Clinic: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
 
(24 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:


==Plot==
==Plot==
After the episode's end credits have scrolled, a BBC voiceover announces that there will be "Five more minutes of ''Monty Python's Flying Circus.''"<ref name="script"/> In the ensuing sketch, an unnamed man portrayed by [[Michael Palin]] approaches a receptionist (Rita Davies) and says he would like to have an [[argument]]. She directs him to a Mr. Barnard (identified as Mr. Vibrating in episode transcripts), who occupies an office down the hall. Palin initially enters the wrong office, in which a man played by [[Graham Chapman]] hurls angry insults at him before clarifying that his office is dedicated to "abuse." Even after sending Palin on his way, Chapman calls him a "stupid [[Git (slang)|git]]."<ref name="script"/>
After the episode's end credits have scrolled, the [[Noddy (camera)|BBC 1 mirror globe]] appears on screen, while a [[Continuity (broadcasting)|continuity announcer]] ([[Eric Idle]]) introduces "five more minutes of ''Monty Python's Flying Circus''".<ref name="script"/> In the ensuing sketch, an unnamed man ([[Michael Palin]]) approaches a receptionist (Rita Davies) and says that he would like to have an argument. She directs him to a Mr. Barnard who occupies an office along the corridor. The customer enters an office in which Barnard ([[Graham Chapman]]) hurls angry insults at him. The customer says that he came into the room for an argument, causing Barnard to apologize and clarify that his office is dedicated to "abuse"; "argument" is next door. He politely sends the customer on his way before calling him a "stupid [[Git (slang)|git]]" out of earshot.<ref name="script"/>


Palin enters the next office, which contains Mr. Barnard/Vibrating, played by [[John Cleese]]. Palin asks if he is in the right office for an argument, to which Cleese responds that he has already told him he is. Palin disputes this, and the men begin an argumentative back-and-forth. Their exchange is a very shallow one, consisting mostly of petty and [[Contradiction|contradictory]] "is/isn't" responses, to the point that Palin feels he is not getting what he paid for. They then argue over the very definition of an argument until Cleese rings a bell and announces that Palin's paid time has concluded.
The customer enters the next office, where Mr. Vibrating ([[John Cleese]]) is seated.<ref name="script"/> The customer asks if he is in the right office for an argument, to which Vibrating responds that he has already told him he is. The customer disputes this, and the men begin an argumentative back-and-forth exchange. Their exchange is a very shallow one, consisting mostly of petty and contradictory "is/isn't" responses, to the point that the customer feels that he is not getting what he paid for. They then argue over the very definition of an argument until Vibrating rings a bell and announces that the customer's paid time has concluded.


Palin is dissatisfied, and tries to argue with Cleese over whether he really got as much time as he paid for, but Cleese insists he is not allowed to argue unless Palin pays for another session. When Palin finally relents and pays more money for additional arguing time, Cleese continues to insist he hasn't paid, and another argument breaks out over that issue. Palin believes he has caught Cleese in a contradiction—arguing without being paid—but Cleese counters that he could be arguing in his spare time. Frustrated, Palin storms out of the room.
The customer is dissatisfied and tries to argue with Vibrating over whether he really got as much time as he paid for, but he insists that he is not allowed to argue unless he is paid for another session. The man finally relents and pays more money for additional arguing time, but Vibrating continues to insist that he has not paid, and another argument breaks out over that issue. He believes that he has caught Vibrating in a contradiction—arguing without being paid—but Vibrating counters that he could be arguing in his spare time. Frustrated, the customer storms out of the room.


The original broadcast version features Palin exploring other rooms in the clinic; he enters a room marked "Complaints" hoping to lodge a complaint, only to find that it is a complaint ''clinic'' in which [[Eric Idle]] is complaining about his shoes. The next office contains [[Terry Jones]] offering "being hit on the head lessons," which a series of policemen interrupt as being too silly.<ref name="script">{{cite book|title=The Complete Monty Python's Flying Circus: All the Words, Volume 2|author=Monty Python|publisher=Pantheon Books|year=1989|page=86|isbn=9780679726487}}</ref>
He proceeds to explore other rooms in the clinic; he enters a room marked "Complaints" hoping to lodge a complaint, only to find that it is a complaint ''clinic'' in which the man in charge (Idle) is complaining about his shoes. The next office contains another man, Spreaders ([[Terry Jones]]), offering "being-hit-on-the-head lessons", which the customer finds a stupid concept. At that point a [[Scotland Yard]] detective, Inspector Fox "of the Light Entertainment Police, Comedy Division, Special Flying Squad" (Chapman) intervenes and declares the two men under arrest for participating in a confusing sketch. However, a second officer, Inspector Thompson's Gazelle "of the Programme Planning Police, Light Entertainment Division, Special Flying Squad" (Idle) comes in and charges the three for "self-conscious behaviour", saying "It's so and so of the Yard" every time the police appear, and for ending a sketch by having a police officer intervene.

As he realizes that he is a part of the skit's absurdity, another policeman (Cleese) enters the room to stop Thompson's Gazelle, followed by a hairy hand stopping him, and the sketch ends. Afterwards, the globe ident appears on screen while the announcer introduces "one more minute of ''Monty Python's Flying Circus''".<ref name="script">{{cite book|title=The Complete Monty Python's Flying Circus: All the Words, Volume 2|author=Monty Python|publisher=Pantheon Books|year=1989|page=86|isbn=9780679726487}}</ref>


==Writing==
==Writing==
The sketch parodies modern consumer culture, implying that anything can be purchased, even absurd things such as arguing, abuse, or being hit over the head.{{sfn|Larsen|2008|p=376}}
The sketch parodies modern consumer culture, implying that anything can be purchased, even absurd things such as arguing, abuse, or being hit over the head.{{sfn|Larsen|2008|p=376}}
The sketch was typical for Cleese's and Chapman's writing at the time, as it relied on verbal comedy.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=V-SLkIap93wC&pg=PA18&dq=cleese+chapman+dialogue+writing&hl=en&sa=X&ei=2dc1UsbcF9CKhQfEmoGQDw&ved=0CEMQuwUwAg#v=onepage&q=cleese%20chapman%20dialogue%20writing&f=false|title=Best of the Britcoms: From Fawlty Towers to The Office|page=18|first=Garry|last=Berman|publisher=Taylor Trade Publications|year=2011|isbn=9781589795662}}</ref> Python author Darl Larsen believes the sketch was influenced by [[music hall]] and radio comedy, particularly that of [[the Goons]], and notes that there is little camera movement during the original television recording.{{sfn|Larsen|2008|p=376}}
The sketch was typical for Cleese and Chapman's writing at the time, as it relied on verbal comedy.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=V-SLkIap93wC&q=cleese+chapman+dialogue+writing&pg=PA18|title=Best of the Britcoms: From Fawlty Towers to The Office|page=18|first=Garry|last=Berman|publisher=Taylor Trade Publications|year=2011|isbn=9781589795662}}</ref> Python author Darl Larsen believes the sketch was influenced by [[music hall]] and radio comedy, particularly that of [[the Goons]], and notes that there is little camera movement during the original television recording.{{sfn|Larsen|2008|p=376}}


One line in the middle of the sketch, "An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a definite proposition" was taken almost verbatim from the ''[[Oxford English Dictionary]]''.{{sfn|Larsen|2008|p=376}}
One line in the middle of the sketch, "An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a definite proposition" was taken almost verbatim from the ''[[Oxford English Dictionary]]''.{{sfn|Larsen|2008|p=376}}


==Performances==
==Performances==
The sketch originally appeared in the 29th episode of the original television series, entitled "[[List of Monty Python's Flying Circus episodes#3. The Money Programme|The Money Programme]]",{{sfn|Brighouse|2013|p=50}} and was released (in audio only) on the LP ''[[Monty Python's Previous Record]]'', on [[Charisma Records]] in 1972.<ref>{{cite book|title=Monty Python: a chronological listing of the troupe's creative output, and articles and reviews about them, 1969–1989|page=60|first=Douglas|last=McCall|publisher=McFarland|isbn=9780899505596}}</ref>
The sketch originally appeared in the 29th episode of the original television series, entitled "[[List of Monty Python's Flying Circus episodes#3. The Money Programme|The Money Programme]]",{{sfn|Brighouse|2013|p=50}} and was released (in audio only) on the LP ''[[Monty Python's Previous Record]]'', on [[Charisma Records]] in 1972.<ref>{{cite book|title=Monty Python: a chronological listing of the troupe's creative output, and articles and reviews about them, 1969–1989|page=60|first=Douglas|last=McCall|year=1991|publisher=McFarland|isbn=9780899505596}}</ref>


The sketch was subsequently performed live at the [[Hollywood Bowl]] in September 1980, which was filmed and released as ''[[Monty Python Live at the Hollywood Bowl]]''.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1982/06/25/movies/python-in-hollywood.html|title='Python' in Hollywood|first=Vincent|last=Canby|work=[[The New York Times]]|date=25 June 1982|accessdate=15 September 2013}}</ref> The sketch features the discussion with the receptionist (played here by [[Carol Cleveland]]), the abuse from Chapman, and most of the argument between Cleese and Palin. It is then ended abruptly by the entrance of [[Terry Gilliam]], on wires, singing "[[I've Got Two Legs]]".<ref>{{cite book|title=Monty Python: A Chronology, 1969–2012|first=Douglas|last=McCall|publisher=McFarland|year=2013|p=88|isbn=978-0-786-47811-8}}</ref> A further live performance occurred in 1989 at the [[The Secret Policeman's Balls|Secret Policeman's Ball]], where Cleveland's and Chapman's roles were replaced by [[Dawn French]] and [[Chris Langham]]. This performance was subsequently released on DVD.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.readexpress.com/2009/01/the_secret_policemans_balls/|title=The Secret Policemens Balls|work=Read Express|publisher=The Washington Post Company|date=28 January 2009|accessdate=15 September 2013}}</ref> The sketch was performed again in July 2014 during ''[[Monty Python Live (Mostly)]]'', with [[Terry Jones]] filling in for Chapman's role and Gilliam reprising "I've Got Two Legs".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/comedy/10940401/The-almost-definitive-guide-to-Monty-Python-Live-Mostly.html|title=The (almost) definitive guide to Monty Python Live (Mostly)|newspaper=The Daily Telegraph|first=Dominic|last=Cavendish|date=2 July 2014|accessdate=5 June 2015}}</ref>
The sketch was subsequently performed live at the [[Hollywood Bowl]] in September 1980, which was filmed and released as ''[[Monty Python Live at the Hollywood Bowl]]''.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1982/06/25/movies/python-in-hollywood.html|title='Python' in Hollywood|first=Vincent|last=Canby|work=[[The New York Times]]|date=25 June 1982|access-date=15 September 2013}}</ref> The sketch features the discussion with the receptionist (played here by [[Carol Cleveland]]), the abuse from Chapman, and most of the argument between Cleese and Palin. It is then ended abruptly by the entrance of [[Terry Gilliam]], on wires, singing "[[I've Got Two Legs]]".<ref>{{cite book|title=Monty Python: A Chronology, 1969–2012|first=Douglas|last=McCall|publisher=McFarland|year=2013|page=88|isbn=978-0-786-47811-8}}</ref> A further live performance occurred in 1989 at the [[The Secret Policeman's Balls|Secret Policeman's Ball]], where Cleveland and Chapman's roles were replaced by [[Dawn French]] and [[Chris Langham]]. This performance was subsequently released on DVD.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.readexpress.com/2009/01/the_secret_policemans_balls/|title=The Secret Policemens Balls|work=Read Express|publisher=The Washington Post Company|date=28 January 2009|access-date=15 September 2013}}</ref> The sketch was performed again in July 2014 during ''[[Monty Python Live (Mostly)]]'', with [[Terry Jones]] filling in for Chapman's role and Gilliam reprising "I've Got Two Legs".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/comedy/10940401/The-almost-definitive-guide-to-Monty-Python-Live-Mostly.html|title=The (almost) definitive guide to Monty Python Live (Mostly)|newspaper=The Daily Telegraph|first=Dominic|last=Cavendish|date=2 July 2014|access-date=5 June 2015}}</ref>


==Cultural references==
==Cultural references==
The sketch has been frequently used as an example of how not to argue, because, as Palin's character notes, it contains little more than [[ad hominem]] attacks and [[contradiction]],<ref>{{cite book|title=Wired for Survival: The Rational (and Irrational) Choices We Make, from the Gas Pump to Terrorism|first=Margaret|last=Polski|page=50|publisher=FT Press|year=2008|isbn=9780138140595}}</ref> and does not contribute to [[critical thinking]].<ref>{{cite book|title=FOCUS on College and Career Success|first1=Constance|last1=Staley|first2=Steve|last2=Staley|pages=109–110|publisher=Cengage Learning|year=2011|isbn=9781439083901}}</ref> It has also been described as a "classical case in point" of dialogue where two parties are unwilling to co-operate,<ref>{{cite book|title=Dialogue and Instruction: Modelling Interaction in Intelligent Tutoring Systems|page=22|editor1-first=Robbert-Jan|editor1-last=Beun|editor2-first=Michael|editor2-last=Baker|editor3-first=Miriam|editor3-last=Reiner|publisher=Springer|year=1995|isbn=9783540588344}}</ref> and as an example of flawed [[logic]], since Palin is attempting to argue that Cleese is not arguing with him.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/philosophygoesto0002falz|url-access=registration|title=Philosophy Goes to the Movies: An Introduction to Philosophy|page=[https://archive.org/details/philosophygoesto0002falz/page/218 218]|first=Christopher|last=Falzon|publisher=Routledge|year=2007|isbn=9780415357258}}</ref>
The sketch has been frequently used as an example of how not to argue, because, as Palin's character notes, it contains little more than [[ad hominem]] attacks and [[contradiction]],<ref>{{cite book|title=Wired for Survival: The Rational (and Irrational) Choices We Make, from the Gas Pump to Terrorism|first=Margaret|last=Polski|page=50|publisher=FT Press|year=2008|isbn=9780138140595}}</ref> and does not contribute to [[critical thinking]].<ref>{{cite book|title=FOCUS on College and Career Success|first1=Constance|last1=Staley|first2=Steve|last2=Staley|pages=109–110|publisher=Cengage Learning|year=2011|isbn=9781439083901}}</ref> It has also been described as a "classical case in point" of dialogue where two parties are unwilling to co-operate,<ref>{{cite book|title=Dialogue and Instruction: Modelling Interaction in Intelligent Tutoring Systems|page=22|editor1-first=Robbert-Jan|editor1-last=Beun|editor2-first=Michael|editor2-last=Baker|editor3-first=Miriam|editor3-last=Reiner|publisher=Springer|year=1995|isbn=9783540588344}}</ref> and as an example of flawed [[logic]], since Palin is attempting to argue that Cleese is not arguing with him.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/philosophygoesto0002falz|url-access=registration|title=Philosophy Goes to the Movies: An Introduction to Philosophy|page=[https://archive.org/details/philosophygoesto0002falz/page/218 218]|first=Christopher|last=Falzon|publisher=Routledge|year=2007|isbn=9780415357258}}</ref>


The text of the argument has been presented as a good example of the workings of [[English grammar]], where sentences can be reduced to simple subject/verb pairs.<ref>{{cite book|title=Analysing English Grammar: A Systemic Functional Introduction|page=115|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2012|first=Lise|last=Fontaine|isbn=9780521190664}}</ref> It has been included as an example of analysing English in school textbooks.<ref name="mullany-stockwell">{{cite book|title=Introducing English Language: A Resource Book for Students|url=https://archive.org/details/introducingengli00mull|url-access=limited|first=Louise|last=Mullany|first2=Peter|last2=Stockwell|publisher=Routledge|year=2010|page=[https://archive.org/details/introducingengli00mull/page/n189 175]|isbn=9780203858110}}</ref> The sketch has become popular with [[philosophy]] students, who note that arguing is "all we are good at", and wonder about the intellectual exercise one could get from paying for a professional quality debate.{{sfn|Brighouse|2013|p=52}}
The text of the argument has been presented as a good example of the workings of [[English grammar]], where sentences can be reduced to simple subject/verb pairs.<ref>{{cite book|title=Analysing English Grammar: A Systemic Functional Introduction|page=115|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2012|first=Lise|last=Fontaine|isbn=9780521190664}}</ref> It has been included as an example of analysing English in school textbooks.<ref name="mullany-stockwell">{{cite book|title=Introducing English Language: A Resource Book for Students|url=https://archive.org/details/introducingengli00mull|url-access=limited|first1=Louise|last1=Mullany|first2=Peter|last2=Stockwell|publisher=Routledge|year=2010|page=[https://archive.org/details/introducingengli00mull/page/n189 175]|isbn=9780203858110}}</ref> The sketch has become popular with [[philosophy]] students, who note that arguing is "all we are good at", and wonder about the intellectual exercise one could get from paying for a professional quality debate.{{sfn|Brighouse|2013|p=52}}

⚫
The [[Python (programming language)|Python programming language]], which contains many Monty Python references as feature names, has an internal-only module called "Argument Clinic" to pre-process Python files.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://docs.python.org/3/howto/clinic.html|title = Argument Clinic How-To — Python 3.10.0 documentation}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0436/|title = PEP 436 -- the Argument Clinic DSL}}</ref>


The sketch is referenced in a line of dialogue in the TV show ''[[House (TV series)|House]]'', season 6, episode 10, "[[Wilson (House episode)|Wilson]]". The character Dr. Wilson says to Dr. House "I didn't come here for an argument," to which House replies "No, right, that's room 12A," echoing the lines from the "abuse room" in the Argument Clinic sketch.
⚫
The [[Python (programming language)|Python programming language]] has an internal-only module called "Argument Clinic" to pre-process Python files.<ref>https://docs.python.org/3/howto/clinic.html</ref><ref>https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0436/</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
*[[Equivocation]]
*[[Ipse dixit]]
*[[Ipse dixit]]
*[[Kettle logic]]


==References==
==References==
Line 54: Line 60:
===Sources===
===Sources===
{{refbegin}}
{{refbegin}}
* {{cite book|title=Monty Python and Philosophy: Nudge Nudge, Think Think!|first=Harry|last=Brighouse|publisher=Open Court|year=2013|isbn=9780812696981|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|title=Monty Python and Philosophy: Nudge Nudge, Think Think!|first=Harry|last=Brighouse|publisher=Open Court|year=2013|isbn=9780812696981}}
* {{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gSFYYKbtDCsC&pg=PA376&dq=%22argument+clinic%22+language&hl=en&sa=X&ei=OdY1Uo-yKJCyhAfg_4GoAQ&ved=0CFcQuwUwBg#v=onepage&q=%22argument%20clinic%22%20language&f=false|title=Monty Python's Flying Circus: An Utterly Complete, Thoroughly Unillustrated, Absolutely Unauthorized Guide to Possibly All the References : from Arthur "Two-Sheds" Jackson to Zambesi|first=Darl|last=Larsen|publisher=Rowman and Littlefield|year=2008|isbn=9780810861312|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gSFYYKbtDCsC&q=%22argument+clinic%22+language&pg=PA376|title=Monty Python's Flying Circus: An Utterly Complete, Thoroughly Unillustrated, Absolutely Unauthorized Guide to Possibly All the References : from Arthur "Two-Sheds" Jackson to Zambesi|first=Darl|last=Larsen|publisher=Rowman and Littlefield|year=2008|isbn=9780810861312}}
{{refend}}
{{refend}}


Latest revision as of 19:54, 11 September 2024

Argument Clinic
A scene from the sketch
Cleese and Palin performing the sketch live in 2014
WritersJohn Cleese
Graham Chapman
ActorsMichael Palin
John Cleese
Graham Chapman
Eric Idle
Terry Jones
Rita Davies
Carol Cleveland
Dawn French
Chris Langham
First appearance"The Money Programme" (2 November 1972)[1]

"Argument Clinic" is a sketch from Monty Python's Flying Circus, written by John Cleese and Graham Chapman. The sketch was originally broadcast as part of the television series and has subsequently been performed live by the group. It relies heavily on wordplay and dialogue, and has been used as an example of how language works.

Plot

[edit]

After the episode's end credits have scrolled, the BBC 1 mirror globe appears on screen, while a continuity announcer (Eric Idle) introduces "five more minutes of Monty Python's Flying Circus".[2] In the ensuing sketch, an unnamed man (Michael Palin) approaches a receptionist (Rita Davies) and says that he would like to have an argument. She directs him to a Mr. Barnard who occupies an office along the corridor. The customer enters an office in which Barnard (Graham Chapman) hurls angry insults at him. The customer says that he came into the room for an argument, causing Barnard to apologize and clarify that his office is dedicated to "abuse"; "argument" is next door. He politely sends the customer on his way before calling him a "stupid git" out of earshot.[2]

The customer enters the next office, where Mr. Vibrating (John Cleese) is seated.[2] The customer asks if he is in the right office for an argument, to which Vibrating responds that he has already told him he is. The customer disputes this, and the men begin an argumentative back-and-forth exchange. Their exchange is a very shallow one, consisting mostly of petty and contradictory "is/isn't" responses, to the point that the customer feels that he is not getting what he paid for. They then argue over the very definition of an argument until Vibrating rings a bell and announces that the customer's paid time has concluded.

The customer is dissatisfied and tries to argue with Vibrating over whether he really got as much time as he paid for, but he insists that he is not allowed to argue unless he is paid for another session. The man finally relents and pays more money for additional arguing time, but Vibrating continues to insist that he has not paid, and another argument breaks out over that issue. He believes that he has caught Vibrating in a contradiction—arguing without being paid—but Vibrating counters that he could be arguing in his spare time. Frustrated, the customer storms out of the room.

He proceeds to explore other rooms in the clinic; he enters a room marked "Complaints" hoping to lodge a complaint, only to find that it is a complaint clinic in which the man in charge (Idle) is complaining about his shoes. The next office contains another man, Spreaders (Terry Jones), offering "being-hit-on-the-head lessons", which the customer finds a stupid concept. At that point a Scotland Yard detective, Inspector Fox "of the Light Entertainment Police, Comedy Division, Special Flying Squad" (Chapman) intervenes and declares the two men under arrest for participating in a confusing sketch. However, a second officer, Inspector Thompson's Gazelle "of the Programme Planning Police, Light Entertainment Division, Special Flying Squad" (Idle) comes in and charges the three for "self-conscious behaviour", saying "It's so and so of the Yard" every time the police appear, and for ending a sketch by having a police officer intervene.

As he realizes that he is a part of the skit's absurdity, another policeman (Cleese) enters the room to stop Thompson's Gazelle, followed by a hairy hand stopping him, and the sketch ends. Afterwards, the globe ident appears on screen while the announcer introduces "one more minute of Monty Python's Flying Circus".[2]

Writing

[edit]

The sketch parodies modern consumer culture, implying that anything can be purchased, even absurd things such as arguing, abuse, or being hit over the head.[3] The sketch was typical for Cleese and Chapman's writing at the time, as it relied on verbal comedy.[4] Python author Darl Larsen believes the sketch was influenced by music hall and radio comedy, particularly that of the Goons, and notes that there is little camera movement during the original television recording.[3]

One line in the middle of the sketch, "An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a definite proposition" was taken almost verbatim from the Oxford English Dictionary.[3]

Performances

[edit]

The sketch originally appeared in the 29th episode of the original television series, entitled "The Money Programme",[5] and was released (in audio only) on the LP Monty Python's Previous Record, on Charisma Records in 1972.[6]

The sketch was subsequently performed live at the Hollywood Bowl in September 1980, which was filmed and released as Monty Python Live at the Hollywood Bowl.[7] The sketch features the discussion with the receptionist (played here by Carol Cleveland), the abuse from Chapman, and most of the argument between Cleese and Palin. It is then ended abruptly by the entrance of Terry Gilliam, on wires, singing "I've Got Two Legs".[8] A further live performance occurred in 1989 at the Secret Policeman's Ball, where Cleveland and Chapman's roles were replaced by Dawn French and Chris Langham. This performance was subsequently released on DVD.[9] The sketch was performed again in July 2014 during Monty Python Live (Mostly), with Terry Jones filling in for Chapman's role and Gilliam reprising "I've Got Two Legs".[10]

Cultural references

[edit]

The sketch has been frequently used as an example of how not to argue, because, as Palin's character notes, it contains little more than ad hominem attacks and contradiction,[11] and does not contribute to critical thinking.[12] It has also been described as a "classical case in point" of dialogue where two parties are unwilling to co-operate,[13] and as an example of flawed logic, since Palin is attempting to argue that Cleese is not arguing with him.[14]

The text of the argument has been presented as a good example of the workings of English grammar, where sentences can be reduced to simple subject/verb pairs.[15] It has been included as an example of analysing English in school textbooks.[1] The sketch has become popular with philosophy students, who note that arguing is "all we are good at", and wonder about the intellectual exercise one could get from paying for a professional quality debate.[16]

The Python programming language, which contains many Monty Python references as feature names, has an internal-only module called "Argument Clinic" to pre-process Python files.[17][18]

The sketch is referenced in a line of dialogue in the TV show House, season 6, episode 10, "Wilson". The character Dr. Wilson says to Dr. House "I didn't come here for an argument," to which House replies "No, right, that's room 12A," echoing the lines from the "abuse room" in the Argument Clinic sketch.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Mullany, Louise; Stockwell, Peter (2010). Introducing English Language: A Resource Book for Students. Routledge. p. 175. ISBN 9780203858110.
  2. ^ a b c d Monty Python (1989). The Complete Monty Python's Flying Circus: All the Words, Volume 2. Pantheon Books. p. 86. ISBN 9780679726487.
  3. ^ a b c Larsen 2008, p. 376.
  4. ^ Berman, Garry (2011). Best of the Britcoms: From Fawlty Towers to The Office. Taylor Trade Publications. p. 18. ISBN 9781589795662.
  5. ^ Brighouse 2013, p. 50.
  6. ^ McCall, Douglas (1991). Monty Python: a chronological listing of the troupe's creative output, and articles and reviews about them, 1969–1989. McFarland. p. 60. ISBN 9780899505596.
  7. ^ Canby, Vincent (25 June 1982). "'Python' in Hollywood". The New York Times. Retrieved 15 September 2013.
  8. ^ McCall, Douglas (2013). Monty Python: A Chronology, 1969–2012. McFarland. p. 88. ISBN 978-0-786-47811-8.
  9. ^ "The Secret Policemens Balls". Read Express. The Washington Post Company. 28 January 2009. Retrieved 15 September 2013.
  10. ^ Cavendish, Dominic (2 July 2014). "The (almost) definitive guide to Monty Python Live (Mostly)". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 5 June 2015.
  11. ^ Polski, Margaret (2008). Wired for Survival: The Rational (and Irrational) Choices We Make, from the Gas Pump to Terrorism. FT Press. p. 50. ISBN 9780138140595.
  12. ^ Staley, Constance; Staley, Steve (2011). FOCUS on College and Career Success. Cengage Learning. pp. 109–110. ISBN 9781439083901.
  13. ^ Beun, Robbert-Jan; Baker, Michael; Reiner, Miriam, eds. (1995). Dialogue and Instruction: Modelling Interaction in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer. p. 22. ISBN 9783540588344.
  14. ^ Falzon, Christopher (2007). Philosophy Goes to the Movies: An Introduction to Philosophy. Routledge. p. 218. ISBN 9780415357258.
  15. ^ Fontaine, Lise (2012). Analysing English Grammar: A Systemic Functional Introduction. Cambridge University Press. p. 115. ISBN 9780521190664.
  16. ^ Brighouse 2013, p. 52.
  17. ^ "Argument Clinic How-To — Python 3.10.0 documentation".
  18. ^ "PEP 436 -- the Argument Clinic DSL".

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Argument_Clinic&oldid=1245231305"