Jump to content

Talk:The Grudge (song)/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
reply
GA Review: Closing review
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==GA Review==
==GA Review==
{{atopg
| status =
| result = Passed. [[User:Pollosito|Santi]] ([[User talk:Pollosito|talk]]) 16:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
}}
{{Good article tools}}
{{Good article tools}}
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:The Grudge (song)/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:The Grudge (song)/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:The Grudge (song)/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:The Grudge (song)/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>
Line 10: Line 14:


#It is '''reasonably well written'''.
#It is '''reasonably well written'''.
#:a ''(prose, spelling, and grammar)'': {{GAList/check|neu}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section|lead]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout|layout]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch|word choice]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|neu}}
#:a ''(prose, spelling, and grammar)'': {{GAList/check|yes}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section|lead]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout|layout]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch|word choice]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
#::
#::
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]''', as shown by a [[WP:GAN/I#R3|source spot-check]].
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]''', as shown by a [[WP:GAN/I#R3|source spot-check]].
#:a ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout#Notes and references|reference section]])'': {{GAList/check|neu}} b ''(inline citations to [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|neu}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|neu}} d ''([[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyvio]] and [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]])'': {{GAList/check|neu}}
#:a ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout#Notes and references|reference section]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}} b ''(inline citations to [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}} d ''([[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyvio]] and [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
#::
#::
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''.
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''.
#:a ''([[WP:Out of scope|major aspects]])'': {{GAList/check|neu}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Article size|focused]])'': {{GAList/check|neu}}
#:a ''([[WP:Out of scope|major aspects]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Article size|focused]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
#::
#::
#It follows the '''[[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] policy'''.
#It follows the '''[[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] policy'''.
#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|neu}}
#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
#::
#::
#It is '''stable'''.
#It is '''stable'''.
#:''No edit wars, etc.'': {{GAList/check|neu}}
#:''No edit wars, etc.'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
#::
#::
#It is illustrated by '''[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''' and other media, where possible and appropriate.
#It is illustrated by '''[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''' and other media, where possible and appropriate.
#:a ''(images are tagged and non-free content have [[Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline|non-free use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check|neu}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Pertinence and encyclopedic nature|appropriate use]] with [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Captions|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check|neu}}
#:a ''(images are tagged and non-free content have [[Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline|non-free use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Pertinence and encyclopedic nature|appropriate use]] with [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Captions|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
#::
#::
#'''Overall''':
#'''Overall''':
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|neu}}
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
#:: <!-- Template:GAList -->
#:: <!-- Template:GAList -->


Line 37: Line 41:
::::@[[User:MaranoFan|MaranoFan]]: So sorry, my family became more serious with me now for this. However, I'll start my review right now. [[User:Pollosito|Santi]] ([[User talk:Pollosito|talk]]) 03:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
::::@[[User:MaranoFan|MaranoFan]]: So sorry, my family became more serious with me now for this. However, I'll start my review right now. [[User:Pollosito|Santi]] ([[User talk:Pollosito|talk]]) 03:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
:::::Everything's good! As long as there's some indication that this is being worked on.--''[[User:MaranoFan|<b style="color:purple">N</b>]][[User talk:MaranoFan|<b style="color:teal">Ø</b>]]'' 15:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
:::::Everything's good! As long as there's some indication that this is being worked on.--''[[User:MaranoFan|<b style="color:purple">N</b>]][[User talk:MaranoFan|<b style="color:teal">Ø</b>]]'' 15:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

=== Background and release ===
* "10th track", hum, I think that from 12 onwards the cardinal numbers should be written with the number as such; It seems to me that the rest would be better written as a word; I mean, "tenth" in this case. [[User:Pollosito|Santi]] ([[User talk:Pollosito|talk]]) 02:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

=== Composition ===
* Everything's perfect. [[User:Pollosito|Santi]] ([[User talk:Pollosito|talk]]) 02:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

=== Critical reception ===
* I don't know how serious is this really, but I think you have to replace the "raw, raspy tone" to another word on your own for not repeating the same citation in the article. [[User:Pollosito|Santi]] ([[User talk:Pollosito|talk]]) 02:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

=== Commercial performance ===
* There's a space between ''Global 200'' and the dot. [[User:Pollosito|Santi]] ([[User talk:Pollosito|talk]]) 02:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
* The Greece archive directs to the ''Guts (Deluxe)'' entries, so "The Grudge" doesn't appear. [[User:Pollosito|Santi]] ([[User talk:Pollosito|talk]]) 02:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

=== Credits and personnel ===
* Everything's good. [[User:Pollosito|Santi]] ([[User talk:Pollosito|talk]]) 02:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

=== Charts ===
* The Greece problem above. [[User:Pollosito|Santi]] ([[User talk:Pollosito|talk]]) 02:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

=== Certifications ===
* Good. [[User:Pollosito|Santi]] ([[User talk:Pollosito|talk]]) 02:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

=== Veredict ===
* I just can say this article is excellent, there were only a few small problems. I won't put it '''on hold''' because you're probably busy right now, and that's part of my responsibility for not taking proper advantage of my PC when it was lent to me. Anyway, good job with Rodrigo's songs! [[User:Pollosito|Santi]] ([[User talk:Pollosito|talk]]) 02:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
:*I have implemented all of your suggestions into the article, [[User:Pollosito|Santi]]. Glad you were able to do this after all!--''[[User:MaranoFan|<b style="color:purple">N</b>]][[User talk:MaranoFan|<b style="color:teal">Ø</b>]]'' 10:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
:*:@[[User:MaranoFan|MaranoFan]]: Then this has been {{passed}}. Congrats again! [[User:Pollosito|Santi]] ([[User talk:Pollosito|talk]]) 16:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->

Latest revision as of 16:51, 12 September 2024

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: MaranoFan (talk · contribs) 15:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Pollosito (talk · contribs) 18:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

As said in "Lacy", I'll be reviewing this article soon. This is my favorite song from Guts, that's because I want to do this. Best, Santi (talk) 18:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds very cool, Santi! Sad to see you are not around as much, though.--NØ 04:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MaranoFan: Not for long hehe. I swear I tried to be more active. Since my two parents were so proud of me for having 3 GAs (2 in this Wiki), I think it would be easier. Santi (talk) 20:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pollosito: We are now coming up on 20 days, so I would like to politely request for the review to be completed now. Would you be able to do this within the next 2-3 days or prefer it be made available to other reviewers in case you are busy?--NØ 02:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MaranoFan: So sorry, my family became more serious with me now for this. However, I'll start my review right now. Santi (talk) 03:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Everything's good! As long as there's some indication that this is being worked on.--NØ 15:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Background and release

[edit]
  • "10th track", hum, I think that from 12 onwards the cardinal numbers should be written with the number as such; It seems to me that the rest would be better written as a word; I mean, "tenth" in this case. Santi (talk) 02:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Composition

[edit]

Critical reception

[edit]
  • I don't know how serious is this really, but I think you have to replace the "raw, raspy tone" to another word on your own for not repeating the same citation in the article. Santi (talk) 02:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial performance

[edit]

Credits and personnel

[edit]

Charts

[edit]

Certifications

[edit]

Veredict

[edit]
  • I just can say this article is excellent, there were only a few small problems. I won't put it on hold because you're probably busy right now, and that's part of my responsibility for not taking proper advantage of my PC when it was lent to me. Anyway, good job with Rodrigo's songs! Santi (talk) 02:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]