Massachusetts Public Interest Research Group: Difference between revisions
fix |
LoneRangerX (talk | contribs) expanded on incomplete sentence, by adding information from sources. |
||
(30 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Organization}} |
|||
⚫ | '''Massachusetts Public Interest Research Group''' (MASSPIRG) is a [[non-profit organization]] that is one of the largest of the state [[Public Interest Research Groups|PIRG]] organizations. It works on a variety of political activities, including textbook trading on college campuses. They also provide [[internship]]s and work study jobs for students on Massachusetts college campuses.Along with the [[Massachusetts Service Alliance]], MASSPIRG helped create Massachusetts Community Water Watch, an organization that works specifically on environmental |
||
{{More citations needed|date=July 2019}} |
|||
MassPIRG has come under fire in several schools, where students wish to see PIRGS funding cut. |
|||
⚫ | '''Massachusetts Public Interest Research Group''' (MASSPIRG) is a [[non-profit organization]] that is one of the largest of the state [[Public Interest Research Groups|PIRG]] organizations. It works on a variety of political activities, including textbook trading on college campuses. They also provide [[internship]]s and work study jobs for students on Massachusetts college campuses. Along with the [[Massachusetts Service Alliance]], MASSPIRG helped to create Massachusetts Community Water Watch, an organization that works specifically on environmental politics. Student funding of MASSPIRG has been criticized at several schools where students wish to see MASSPIRG funding cut, citing that the mandatory fees do not effectively contribute directly to any cause on campus, and are a complication to students forced to pay "already tedious" tuition fees.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://dailycollegian.com/2003/09/masspirg-manipulates-umass-students |title=MassPIRG manipulates UMass students |date=September 7, 2003 |publisher=Massachusetts Daily Collegian}}</ref> |
||
==History== |
==History== |
||
The Public Interest Research Groups emerged at the behest of Ralph Nader who, during a college speaking tour, called on students to form political groups. |
The [[Public Interest Research Group|Public Interest Research Groups]] emerged at the behest of [[Ralph Nader]] who, during a college speaking tour, called on students to form political groups. |
||
==Criticism and rebuttal== |
==Criticism and rebuttal== |
||
⚫ | The book ''[[Activism, Inc.|Activism, Inc: How the Outsourcing of Grassroots Campaigns Is Strangling Progressive Politics in America]]'' by [[Columbia University]] sociologist [[Dana R. Fisher|Dana Fisher]], is based on an ethnographic study she did in a stratified random sample of fund canvass offices during the summer of 2003. Fisher charges the corporatized fundraising model (of which the Fund is an example) with mistreating idealistic young people by using them as interchangeable parts and providing them with insufficient training. Fisher also states that the outsourcing of grassroots organizing by groups like the [[Sierra Club]] and [[Greenpeace]] to organizations like the Fund has led to the decay of grassroots infrastructure and opportunities for involvement on the left.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20080911134513/http://www.sup.org/html/book_pages/0804752176/Press%20Release.pdf Activism, Inc.: How the Outsourcing of Grassroots Campaigns Is Strangling Progressive Politics in America]</ref> The Fund has created a website, canvassingworks.org, to respond to a few of the criticisms raised by the book. The site includes testimony by former Fund staff who have moved into leading roles in other progressive organizations and other progressive leaders, including U.S. Representative [[Jan Schakowsky]] (IL), Sierra Club Executive Director [[Carl Pope (environmentalist)|Carl Pope]], Dr. [[Woody Holton]] (Associate Professor of American history at the [[University of Richmond]]), and Randy Hayes of the [[Rainforest Action Network]]. |
||
The book "Activism, Inc: How the Outsourcing of Grassroots Campaigns Is Strangling Progressive Politics in America" |
|||
⚫ | by Columbia University sociologist Dana Fisher, is based on an ethnographic study she did in a stratified random sample of fund canvass offices during the summer of 2003. Fisher charges the corporatized fundraising model (of which the Fund is an example) with mistreating idealistic young people by using them as interchangeable parts and providing them with insufficient training |
||
==Notable members== |
==Notable members== |
||
* [[Joyce Elaine Roop]]{{Citation needed|reason=membership not sourced in her article|date=October 2016}} |
|||
*[[Janet Domenitz]] |
|||
*[[Margie Alt]] |
|||
*[[Frank Gorke]] |
|||
*[[Surf Del Mar]] |
|||
* [[Joyce Elaine Roop]] |
|||
==Affiliate organizations== |
==Affiliate organizations== |
||
*[[ |
*[[The Fund for Public Interest Research]] |
||
* |
*Environment Massachusetts |
||
*[[Human Rights Campaign]] |
*[[Human Rights Campaign]] |
||
*[[Sierra Club]] |
*[[Sierra Club]] |
||
Line 26: | Line 21: | ||
{{Reflist}} |
{{Reflist}} |
||
{{Public Interest Research Group}} |
|||
==External links== |
|||
{{Consumer protection}} |
|||
*[http://masspirg.org/ MASSPIRG.org] |
|||
*[http://www.waterwatchonline.org/ma/ Massachusetts Community Water Watch] |
|||
{{authority control}} |
|||
[[Category:Public Interest Research Groups]] |
[[Category:Public Interest Research Groups]] |
Latest revision as of 07:17, 15 September 2024
This article needs additional citations for verification. (July 2019) |
Massachusetts Public Interest Research Group (MASSPIRG) is a non-profit organization that is one of the largest of the state PIRG organizations. It works on a variety of political activities, including textbook trading on college campuses. They also provide internships and work study jobs for students on Massachusetts college campuses. Along with the Massachusetts Service Alliance, MASSPIRG helped to create Massachusetts Community Water Watch, an organization that works specifically on environmental politics. Student funding of MASSPIRG has been criticized at several schools where students wish to see MASSPIRG funding cut, citing that the mandatory fees do not effectively contribute directly to any cause on campus, and are a complication to students forced to pay "already tedious" tuition fees.[1]
History
[edit]The Public Interest Research Groups emerged at the behest of Ralph Nader who, during a college speaking tour, called on students to form political groups.
Criticism and rebuttal
[edit]The book Activism, Inc: How the Outsourcing of Grassroots Campaigns Is Strangling Progressive Politics in America by Columbia University sociologist Dana Fisher, is based on an ethnographic study she did in a stratified random sample of fund canvass offices during the summer of 2003. Fisher charges the corporatized fundraising model (of which the Fund is an example) with mistreating idealistic young people by using them as interchangeable parts and providing them with insufficient training. Fisher also states that the outsourcing of grassroots organizing by groups like the Sierra Club and Greenpeace to organizations like the Fund has led to the decay of grassroots infrastructure and opportunities for involvement on the left.[2] The Fund has created a website, canvassingworks.org, to respond to a few of the criticisms raised by the book. The site includes testimony by former Fund staff who have moved into leading roles in other progressive organizations and other progressive leaders, including U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky (IL), Sierra Club Executive Director Carl Pope, Dr. Woody Holton (Associate Professor of American history at the University of Richmond), and Randy Hayes of the Rainforest Action Network.
Notable members
[edit]Affiliate organizations
[edit]- The Fund for Public Interest Research
- Environment Massachusetts
- Human Rights Campaign
- Sierra Club
References
[edit]- ^ "MassPIRG manipulates UMass students". Massachusetts Daily Collegian. September 7, 2003.
- ^ Activism, Inc.: How the Outsourcing of Grassroots Campaigns Is Strangling Progressive Politics in America