Agenda 21: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
→Opposition: "same year" is unclear since previous sentence mentions no year |
||
(24 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description| |
{{short description|United Nations action plan, 1992}} |
||
{{Distinguish|Agenda 2030|Agenda 2000}} |
{{Distinguish|Agenda 2030|Agenda 2000|Agenda 47}} |
||
{{more citations needed|date=April 2019}} |
{{more citations needed|date=April 2019}} |
||
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2019}} |
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2019}} |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| image = Agenda 21 Cover.gif |
| image = Agenda 21 Cover.gif |
||
| caption = Cover of the first edition (paperback) |
| caption = Cover of the first edition (paperback) |
||
| author = |
| author = United Nations (1992) 29 years |
||
| illustrator = |
| illustrator = |
||
| cover_artist = |
| cover_artist = |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| publisher = United Nations |
| publisher = United Nations |
||
| release_date = {{start date and age|1992|4|23|paren=y|br=y|df=y}} |
| release_date = {{start date and age|1992|4|23|paren=y|br=y|df=y}} |
||
| media_type = Print ( |
| media_type = Print (Paperback), HTML, PDF |
||
| pages = 300 pp |
| pages = 300 pp |
||
| isbn = 978-92-1-100509-7 |
| isbn = 978-92-1-100509-7 |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
|italic title=no |
|italic title=no |
||
}} |
}} |
||
'''Agenda 21''' is a non-binding [[action plan]] of the |
'''Agenda 21''' is a non-binding [[action plan]] of the United Nations with regard to [[sustainable development]].<ref>{{cite web|title=What is Agenda 21?|url=http://www.icleiusa.org/about-iclei/faqs/faq-iclei-the-united-nations-and-agenda-21#what-is-agenda-21|publisher=ICLEIUSA|access-date=8 December 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121212203307/http://www.icleiusa.org/about-iclei/faqs/faq-iclei-the-united-nations-and-agenda-21#what-is-agenda-21|archive-date=12 December 2012}}</ref> It is a product of the [[Earth Summit]] (UN Conference on Environment and Development) held in [[Rio de Janeiro]], Brazil, in 1992. It is an action agenda for the UN, other multilateral organizations, and individual governments around the world that can be executed at local, national, and global levels. One major objective of the Agenda 21 initiative is that every local government should draw its own local Agenda 21. Its aim initially was to achieve global sustainable development by 2000, with the "21" in Agenda 21 referring to the original target of the 21st century.<ref name=":0" /> |
||
== Structure == |
== Structure == |
||
Agenda 21 is grouped into 4 sections: |
Agenda 21 is grouped into 4 sections: |
||
* |
* ''Section I: Social and Economic Dimensions'' is directed toward combating poverty, especially in [[developing countries]], changing consumption patterns, promoting health, achieving a more sustainable population, and sustainable settlement in decision making. |
||
* |
* ''Section II: Conservation and Management of Resources for Development'' includes atmospheric protection, combating [[deforestation]], protecting fragile environments, conservation of biological diversity ([[biodiversity]]), [[control of pollution]] and the management of [[biotechnology]], and [[radioactive waste]]s. |
||
* |
* ''Section III: Strengthening the Role of Major Groups'' includes the roles of children and youth, women, NGOs, local authorities, business and industry, and workers; and strengthening the role of [[indigenous peoples]], their communities, and farmers. |
||
* |
* ''Section IV: Means of Implementation'' includes science, [[technology transfer]], [[education for sustainable development|education]] [[international organization|international institutions]], and financial mechanisms.<ref name=":0">{{cite web|url=https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf|title=Agenda 21|website=sustainabledevelopment.un.org}}</ref> |
||
==Development and evolution== |
==Development and evolution== |
||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
=== Local level === |
=== Local level === |
||
{{See also| International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives}} |
{{See also| International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives}} |
||
The implementation of Agenda 21 was intended to involve action at international, national, regional and local levels. Some national and state governments have legislated or advised that local authorities take steps to implement the plan locally, as recommended in Chapter 28 of the document. These programs are often known as "Local Agenda 21" or "LA21".<ref>[http://www.ace.mmu.ac.uk/eae/sustainability/Older/Local_Agenda21.html Manchester Metropolitan University] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090722181929/http://www.ace.mmu.ac.uk/eae/sustainability/Older/Local_Agenda21.html |date=22 July 2009 }}</ref> For example, in the |
The implementation of Agenda 21 was intended to involve action at international, national, regional and local levels. Some national and state governments have legislated or advised that local authorities take steps to implement the plan locally, as recommended in Chapter 28 of the document. These programs are often known as "Local Agenda 21" or "LA21".<ref>[http://www.ace.mmu.ac.uk/eae/sustainability/Older/Local_Agenda21.html Manchester Metropolitan University] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090722181929/http://www.ace.mmu.ac.uk/eae/sustainability/Older/Local_Agenda21.html |date=22 July 2009 }}</ref> For example, in the Philippines, the plan is "Philippines Agenda 21" (PA21). The group, ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability, formed in 1990; today its members come from over 1,000 cities, towns, and counties in 88 countries and is widely regarded as a paragon of Agenda 21 implementation.<ref name=nyt>{{cite news|last1=Kaufman|first1=Leslie|author2=Kate Zernike|author-link2=Kate Zernike|title=Activists Fight Green Projects, Seeing U.N. Plot|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/04/us/activists-fight-green-projects-seeing-un-plot.html?pagewanted=all|newspaper=The New York Times|date=3 February 2012|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120819154240/http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/04/us/activists-fight-green-projects-seeing-un-plot.html?pagewanted=all|archive-date=19 August 2012}}</ref> |
||
Europe turned out to be the continent where LA21 was best accepted and most implemented.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Smardon|first=Richard|title=A comparison of Local Agenda 21 implementation in North American, European and Indian cities|journal=Management of Environmental Quality|year=2008|volume=19|issue=1|pages=118–137|doi=10.1108/14777830810840408|access-date=9 October 2013|url=https://www.scribd.com/doc/86583203/A-Comparison-of-Local-Agenda-21-Implementation-in-North-American-European-and-Indian-Cities|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150611110931/https://www.scribd.com/doc/86583203/A-Comparison-of-Local-Agenda-21-Implementation-in-North-American-European-and-Indian-Cities|archive-date=11 June 2015}}</ref> In Sweden, for example, four small- to medium-sized municipalities in the south-east of Sweden were chosen for a 5-year study of their Local Agenda 21 (LA21) processes a Local Agenda 21 initiative.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Jörby|first=Sofie|title=Local Agenda 21 in four Swedish Municipalities: a tool towards sustainability|journal=Journal of Environmental Planning and Management|year=2002|volume=45|issue=2|pages=219–244|doi=10.1080/09640560220116314|s2cid=155038036}}</ref> |
Europe turned out to be the continent where LA21 was best accepted and most implemented.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Smardon|first=Richard|title=A comparison of Local Agenda 21 implementation in North American, European and Indian cities|journal=Management of Environmental Quality|year=2008|volume=19|issue=1|pages=118–137|doi=10.1108/14777830810840408|bibcode=2008MEnvQ..19..118S |access-date=9 October 2013|url=https://www.scribd.com/doc/86583203/A-Comparison-of-Local-Agenda-21-Implementation-in-North-American-European-and-Indian-Cities|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150611110931/https://www.scribd.com/doc/86583203/A-Comparison-of-Local-Agenda-21-Implementation-in-North-American-European-and-Indian-Cities|archive-date=11 June 2015}}</ref> In Sweden, for example, four small- to medium-sized municipalities in the south-east of Sweden were chosen for a 5-year study of their Local Agenda 21 (LA21) processes a Local Agenda 21 initiative.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Jörby|first=Sofie|title=Local Agenda 21 in four Swedish Municipalities: a tool towards sustainability|journal=Journal of Environmental Planning and Management|year=2002|volume=45|issue=2|pages=219–244|doi=10.1080/09640560220116314|bibcode=2002JEPM...45..219J |s2cid=155038036}}</ref> |
||
==Regional levels== |
==Regional levels== |
||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
The UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs' Division for Sustainable Development monitors and evaluates progress, nation by nation, towards the adoption of Agenda 21, and makes these reports available to the public on its website.<ref>{{cite web|last=UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs|title=Areas of Work – National Information by Country or Organization|url=https://www.un.org/esa/dsd/dsd_aofw_ni/ni_index.shtml|publisher=United Nations|access-date=15 August 2012|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120804031335/http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/dsd_aofw_ni/ni_index.shtml|archive-date=4 August 2012}}</ref> |
The UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs' Division for Sustainable Development monitors and evaluates progress, nation by nation, towards the adoption of Agenda 21, and makes these reports available to the public on its website.<ref>{{cite web|last=UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs|title=Areas of Work – National Information by Country or Organization|url=https://www.un.org/esa/dsd/dsd_aofw_ni/ni_index.shtml|publisher=United Nations|access-date=15 August 2012|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120804031335/http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/dsd_aofw_ni/ni_index.shtml|archive-date=4 August 2012}}</ref> |
||
The Rio+10 report<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://www.citego.org/bdf_fiche-document-1299_en.html | title=20 years of Local Agenda 21 }}</ref> identified over 6400 local governments in 113 countries worldwide that were engaged in Local Agenda 21 (LA21) activities, a more than three-fold increase over less than five years. 80% = 5120 of these local governments, were located in Europe. A significant increase has been noted in the number of countries in which one or more LA21 processes were underway. |
The Rio+10 report<ref name="20 years of Local Agenda 21">{{Cite web | url=https://www.citego.org/bdf_fiche-document-1299_en.html | title=20 years of Local Agenda 21 }}</ref> identified over 6400 local governments in 113 countries worldwide that were engaged in Local Agenda 21 (LA21) activities, a more than three-fold increase over less than five years. 80% = 5120 of these local governments, were located in Europe. A significant increase has been noted in the number of countries in which one or more LA21 processes were underway. |
||
===Australia=== |
===Australia=== |
||
Australia is a signatory to Agenda 21 and 88 of its municipalities subscribe to [[ICLEI]], an organization that promotes Agenda 21 globally. Australia's membership is second only to that of the United States.<ref name=ICLEI>{{cite web|last=ICLEI |title=ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability: Global Members |url=http://www.iclei.org/index.php?id=11454 |access-date=15 August 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120725211037/http://www.iclei.org/index.php?id=11454 |archive-date=25 July 2012 }}</ref> |
|||
===Africa=== |
===Africa=== |
||
In Africa, national support for Agenda 21 is strong and most countries are signatories. But support is often closely tied to environmental challenges specific to each country; for example, in 2002 [[Sam Nujoma]], who was then President of |
In Africa, national support for Agenda 21 is strong and most countries are signatories. But support is often closely tied to environmental challenges specific to each country; for example, in 2002 [[Sam Nujoma]], who was then President of Namibia, spoke about the importance of adhering to Agenda 21 at the 2002 Earth Summit, noting that as a [[semi-arid]] country, Namibia sets a lot of store in the [[United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification]] (UNCCD).<ref>{{cite news|title=Namibian president calls for implementation of Agenda 21|url=http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2002-09/02/content_547409.htm|access-date=15 August 2012|newspaper=Xinhua News Agency|date=2 September 2002|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130115234421/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2002-09/02/content_547409.htm|archive-date=15 January 2013}}</ref> Furthermore, there is little mention of Agenda 21 at the local level in indigenous media. Only major municipalities in [[sub-Saharan Africa]]n countries are members of ICLEI. Agenda 21 participation in North African countries mirrors that of Middle Eastern countries, with most countries being signatories but little to no adoption on the local-government level. Countries in sub-Saharan Africa and North Africa generally have poorly documented Agenda 21 status reports.{{citation needed|date=September 2013}} By contrast, South Africa's participation in Agenda 21 mirrors that of modern Europe, with 21 city members of ICLEI and support of Agenda 21 by national-level government.{{citation needed|date=September 2013}} |
||
===North America=== |
===North America=== |
||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
===== Support ===== |
===== Support ===== |
||
The United States is a signatory country to Agenda 21, but because Agenda 21 is a legally non-binding statement of intent and not a treaty, the [[United States Senate]] did not hold a formal debate or vote on it. It is therefore not considered to be law under [[Article Six of the United States Constitution]]. President [[George H. W. Bush]] was one of the 178 heads of government who signed the final text of the agreement at the Earth Summit in 1992,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://blogs.courier-journal.com/watchdogearth/2013/02/20/senators-attack-sustainable-development-and-agenda-21/|title=Senators attack sustainable development, Agenda 21|work=[[The Courier-Journal]]|date=20 February 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20131012081628/http://blogs.courier-journal.com/watchdogearth/2013/02/20/senators-attack-sustainable-development-and-agenda-21/|archive-date=12 October 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.wyomingnews.com/articles/2012/11/04/news/01top_11-04-12.txt|title=Secret agenda at city hall?|date=4 November 2012|work=Wyoming Tribune Eagle}}</ref> and in the same year Representatives [[Nancy Pelosi]], [[Eliot Engel]] and [[William Broomfield]] spoke in support of [[United States House of Representatives]] Concurrent Resolution 353, supporting implementation of Agenda 21 in the United States.<ref name=HuffPost /><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MxMif1tBVk|title=Agenda 21 Nancy Pelosi .mp4|last=Arnie Rosner|date=3 March 2012|access-date=27 April 2018|via=YouTube|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180323204956/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MxMif1tBVk|archive-date=23 March 2018}}</ref> Created by Executive Order 12852 in 1993, the President's Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD) is explicitly charged with recommending a national action plan for sustainable development to the President.<ref>{{Cite book|last=States|first=President of the United|url=https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Executive_Order_12852|title=Executive Order 12852}}</ref> The PCSD is composed of leaders from government and industry, as well as from environmental, labor and civil rights organizations. The PCSD submitted its report, "Sustainable America: A New Consensus", to the President in early 1996. In the absence of a multi-sectoral consensus on how to achieve sustainable development in the United States, the PCSD was conceived to formulate recommendations for the implementation of Agenda 21.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Agenda 21, Op. Cit., Chapter 20.21(c), p. 201.|url=https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf|url-status=live|website=United Nations|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121124175252/http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf |archive-date=24 November 2012 }}</ref> Executive Order 12852 was revoked by Executive Order 13138 in 1999.<ref>{{Cite book|last=States|first=President of the United|url=https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13138|title=Executive Order 13138}}</ref> The PCSD set 10 common goals to support the Agenda 21 movement: |
The United States is a signatory country to Agenda 21, but because Agenda 21 is a legally non-binding statement of intent and not a treaty, the [[United States Senate]] did not hold a formal debate or vote on it. It is therefore not considered to be law under [[Article Six of the United States Constitution]]. President [[George H. W. Bush]] was one of the 178 heads of government who signed the final text of the agreement at the Earth Summit in 1992,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://blogs.courier-journal.com/watchdogearth/2013/02/20/senators-attack-sustainable-development-and-agenda-21/|title=Senators attack sustainable development, Agenda 21|work=[[The Courier-Journal]]|date=20 February 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20131012081628/http://blogs.courier-journal.com/watchdogearth/2013/02/20/senators-attack-sustainable-development-and-agenda-21/|archive-date=12 October 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.wyomingnews.com/articles/2012/11/04/news/01top_11-04-12.txt|archive-url=https://archive.today/20131012081546/http://www.wyomingnews.com/articles/2012/11/04/news/01top_11-04-12.txt|url-status=dead|archive-date=12 October 2013|title=Secret agenda at city hall?|date=4 November 2012|work=Wyoming Tribune Eagle}}</ref> and in the same year Representatives [[Nancy Pelosi]], [[Eliot Engel]] and [[William Broomfield]] spoke in support of [[United States House of Representatives]] Concurrent Resolution 353, supporting implementation of Agenda 21 in the United States.<ref name=HuffPost /><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MxMif1tBVk|title=Agenda 21 Nancy Pelosi .mp4|last=Arnie Rosner|date=3 March 2012|access-date=27 April 2018|via=YouTube|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180323204956/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MxMif1tBVk|archive-date=23 March 2018}}</ref> Created by Executive Order 12852 in 1993, the President's Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD) is explicitly charged with recommending a national action plan for sustainable development to the President.<ref>{{Cite book|last=States|first=President of the United|url=https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Executive_Order_12852|title=Executive Order 12852}}</ref> The PCSD is composed of leaders from government and industry, as well as from environmental, labor and civil rights organizations. The PCSD submitted its report, "Sustainable America: A New Consensus", to the President in early 1996. In the absence of a multi-sectoral consensus on how to achieve sustainable development in the United States, the PCSD was conceived to formulate recommendations for the implementation of Agenda 21.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Agenda 21, Op. Cit., Chapter 20.21(c), p. 201.|url=https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf|url-status=live|website=United Nations|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121124175252/http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf |archive-date=24 November 2012 }}</ref> Executive Order 12852 was revoked by Executive Order 13138 in 1999.<ref>{{Cite book|last=States|first=President of the United|url=https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13138|title=Executive Order 13138}}</ref> The PCSD set 10 common goals to support the Agenda 21 movement:<ref>{{Cite web|title=Chapter 1|url=https://clintonwhitehouse4.archives.gov/PCSD/Publications/TF_Reports/amer-chap1.html|access-date=2021-11-23|website=clintonwhitehouse4.archives.gov}}</ref> |
||
# Health and the environment |
# Health and the environment |
||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
# Population |
# Population |
||
# International responsibility |
# International responsibility |
||
# Education. |
# Education. |
||
In the United States, over 528 cities are members of [[ICLEI]], an international sustainability organization that helps to implement the Agenda 21 and Local Agenda 21 concepts across the world. The United States has nearly half of the ICLEI's global membership of 1,200 cities promoting sustainable development at a local level.<ref name=ICLEI /> The United States also has one of the most comprehensively documented Agenda 21 status reports.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/countr/usa/natur.htm|title=Agenda 21 – United States|website=www.un.org|access-date=27 April 2018|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171008053420/http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/countr/usa/natur.htm|archive-date=8 October 2017}}</ref> In response to the opposition, Don Knapp, U.S. spokesman for the ICLEI, has said "Sustainable development is not a top-down conspiracy from the U.N., but a bottom-up push from local governments".<ref name=HuffPost/> |
In the United States, over 528 cities are members of [[ICLEI]], an international sustainability organization that helps to implement the Agenda 21 and Local Agenda 21 concepts across the world. The United States has nearly half of the ICLEI's global membership of 1,200 cities promoting sustainable development at a local level.<ref name=ICLEI /> The United States also has one of the most comprehensively documented Agenda 21 status reports.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/countr/usa/natur.htm|title=Agenda 21 – United States|website=www.un.org|access-date=27 April 2018|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171008053420/http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/countr/usa/natur.htm|archive-date=8 October 2017}}</ref> In response to the opposition, Don Knapp, U.S. spokesman for the ICLEI, has said "Sustainable development is not a top-down conspiracy from the U.N., but a bottom-up push from local governments".<ref name=HuffPost/> |
||
===== Opposition ===== |
===== Opposition ===== |
||
Agenda 21 fears have played a role in opposition to local government's efforts to promote resource and land conservation, build [[bike lane]]s, and construct hubs for [[public transportation]].<ref name="Kaufman_20120204"/> The non-profit group [[ICLEI]] – Local Governments for Sustainability USA – was targeted by anti-Agenda 21 activists.<ref name="Kaufman_20120204"/> In |
Agenda 21 fears have played a role in opposition to local government's efforts to promote resource and land conservation, build [[bike lane]]s, and construct hubs for [[public transportation]].<ref name="Kaufman_20120204"/> The non-profit group [[ICLEI]] – Local Governments for Sustainability USA – was targeted by anti-Agenda 21 activists.<ref name="Kaufman_20120204"/> In 2012, fears of Agenda 21 "went mainstream" when the [[Republican National Committee]] adopted a platform resolution stated that "We strongly reject the U.N. Agenda 21 as erosive of American sovereignty."<ref>{{cite news|last=Jamison|first=Peter|title=Fears of Agenda 21 go mainstream in the Republican Party platform|url=http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/national/article1248666.ece|access-date=23 October 2012|newspaper=Tampa Bay Times|date=30 August 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121103000416/http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/national/article1248666.ece|archive-date=3 November 2012}}</ref><ref name="Harman"/> |
||
Several state and local governments have considered or passed motions and legislation opposing Agenda 21.<ref name=nyt /><ref name=HuffPost/><ref name="Harman"/> Most such bills failed, "either dying in committee, getting defeated on the statehouse floor or – in the case of [[Missouri]]'s 2013 bill – getting vetoed by the governor."<ref name="Harman"/> In [[Texas]], for example, broadly worded legislation that would prohibit any governmental entity from accepting from or granting money to any "nongovernmental or intergovernmental organization accredited by the United Nations to implement a policy that originated in the Agenda 21 plan" was defeated because it could have cut off funding for groups such as [[4-H]], the [[Boy Scouts of America]], and the Texas Wildlife Association.<ref name="Harman"/> In Arizona, a similarly sweeping bill was introduced in the [[Arizona State Legislature]] seeking to mandate that the state could not "adopt or implement the creed, doctrine, or principles or any tenet" of Agenda 21 and to prohibit the state "implementing programs of, expending any sum of money for, being a member of, receiving funding from, contracting services from, or giving financial or other forms of aid to" an array of sustainability organizations.<ref name="Harman"/> The bill, which was opposed by the state chamber of commerce and the mayor of [[Phoenix, Arizona|Phoenix]], was defeated in 2012.<ref name="Harman"/> [[Alabama]] was one state that did adopt an anti-Agenda 21 |
Several state and local governments have considered or passed motions and legislation opposing Agenda 21.<ref name=nyt /><ref name=HuffPost/><ref name="Harman"/><ref>{{cite web | last=Batheja | first=Aman | title=U.N.-Backed Agenda 21 Triggers Strong Reactions From Many in Texas | website=The Texas Tribune | date=August 28, 2012 | url=https://www.texastribune.org/2012/08/28/fears-un-backed-agenda-21-spark-anger-across-texas/ | access-date=January 17, 2024}}</ref> Most such bills failed, "either dying in committee, getting defeated on the statehouse floor or – in the case of [[Missouri]]'s 2013 bill – getting vetoed by the governor."<ref name="Harman"/> In [[Texas]], for example, broadly worded legislation that would prohibit any governmental entity from accepting from or granting money to any "nongovernmental or intergovernmental organization accredited by the United Nations to implement a policy that originated in the Agenda 21 plan" was defeated because it could have cut off funding for groups such as [[4-H]], the [[Boy Scouts of America]], and the Texas Wildlife Association.<ref name="Harman"/><ref>{{cite web | last1=Satija | first1=Neena | last2=McCrimmon | first2=Ryan | title=Conservative Lawmakers Target United Nations | website=The Texas Tribune | date=February 26, 2015 | url=https://www.texastribune.org/2015/02/26/conservative-lawmakers-continue-assault-un/ | access-date=January 17, 2024}}</ref> In Arizona, a similarly sweeping bill was introduced in the [[Arizona State Legislature]] seeking to mandate that the state could not "adopt or implement the creed, doctrine, or principles or any tenet" of Agenda 21 and to prohibit the state "implementing programs of, expending any sum of money for, being a member of, receiving funding from, contracting services from, or giving financial or other forms of aid to" an array of sustainability organizations.<ref name="Harman"/> The bill, which was opposed by the state chamber of commerce and the mayor of [[Phoenix, Arizona|Phoenix]], was defeated in 2012.<ref name="Harman"/> [[Alabama]] was one state that did adopt an anti-Agenda 21 law, unanimously passing in 2012 a measure to block "any future effort to 'deliberately or inadvertently infringe or restrict private property rights without due process, as may be required by policy recommendations originating in, or traceable to 'Agenda 21.'"<ref name="Harman"/> |
||
In 2023, [[Tennessee]] enacted legislation to block the implementation of Agenda 21 and other programs “originating in, or traceable to, the United Nations or a subsidiary entity of the United Nations.”<ref>{{cite web | title=State of Tennessee Public Chapter No. 479 | url=https://publications.tnsosfiles.com/acts/113/pub/pc0479.pdf | website=Tennessee Secretary of State | access-date=January 17, 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | last=Sullivan | first=Kevin | title=Inside the Tennessee legislature, where a GOP supermajority reigns | newspaper=Washington Post | date=May 15, 2023 | url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/15/inside-tennessee-legislature-where-gop-supermajority-reigns/ | access-date=January 17, 2024}}</ref> |
|||
===== Conspiracy theories ===== |
===== Conspiracy theories ===== |
||
Line 115: | Line 117: | ||
Anti-Agenda 21 theories have circulated in the U.S. Some [[Tea Party movement]] activists and others promoted the notion that Agenda 21 was part of a UN plot to deny property rights, undermine U.S. sovereignty, or force citizens to move to cities.<ref name="Kaufman_20120204">{{Cite news | first=Leslie | last=Kaufman | author2=Kate Zernike | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/04/us/activists-fight-green-projects-seeing-un-plot.html | title=Activists Fight Green Projects, Seeing U.N. Plot | newspaper=The New York Times | date=4 February 2012 | url-status=live | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130530080353/http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/04/us/activists-fight-green-projects-seeing-un-plot.html | archive-date=30 May 2013 }}</ref><ref name="Harman">{{cite news | first=Greg | last=Harman | url=https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/jun/24/agenda-21-conspiracy-theory-sustainability | title=Agenda 21: a conspiracy theory puts sustainability in the crosshairs | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170626204243/https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/jun/24/agenda-21-conspiracy-theory-sustainability |archive-date=26 June 2017 | newspaper=The Guardian | date=24 June 2015}}</ref><ref name=nyt/><ref name=HuffPost>{{cite news|title=Tea Party Activists Fight Agenda 21, Seeing Threatening U.N. Plot|url=https://huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/15/agenda-21-tea-party_n_1965893.html|access-date=16 October 2012|date=15 October 2012|work=Huffington Post|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121018011039/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/15/agenda-21-tea-party_n_1965893.html|archive-date=18 October 2012}}</ref> |
Anti-Agenda 21 theories have circulated in the U.S. Some [[Tea Party movement]] activists and others promoted the notion that Agenda 21 was part of a UN plot to deny property rights, undermine U.S. sovereignty, or force citizens to move to cities.<ref name="Kaufman_20120204">{{Cite news | first=Leslie | last=Kaufman | author2=Kate Zernike | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/04/us/activists-fight-green-projects-seeing-un-plot.html | title=Activists Fight Green Projects, Seeing U.N. Plot | newspaper=The New York Times | date=4 February 2012 | url-status=live | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130530080353/http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/04/us/activists-fight-green-projects-seeing-un-plot.html | archive-date=30 May 2013 }}</ref><ref name="Harman">{{cite news | first=Greg | last=Harman | url=https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/jun/24/agenda-21-conspiracy-theory-sustainability | title=Agenda 21: a conspiracy theory puts sustainability in the crosshairs | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170626204243/https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/jun/24/agenda-21-conspiracy-theory-sustainability |archive-date=26 June 2017 | newspaper=The Guardian | date=24 June 2015}}</ref><ref name=nyt/><ref name=HuffPost>{{cite news|title=Tea Party Activists Fight Agenda 21, Seeing Threatening U.N. Plot|url=https://huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/15/agenda-21-tea-party_n_1965893.html|access-date=16 October 2012|date=15 October 2012|work=Huffington Post|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121018011039/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/15/agenda-21-tea-party_n_1965893.html|archive-date=18 October 2012}}</ref> |
||
[[Glenn Beck]] warned that Agenda 21 was a "seditious" conspiracy to cut the world population by 85%.<ref name="SPLC_20120401"/> He claimed it represents a move towards "government control on a global level" and the creation of a "police state" that would lead to "totalitarianism."<ref name="SPLC_20120401"/> Beck described the dystopia it would cause if the world followed the UN plan in a 2012 novel he co-authored called ''Agenda 21''.<ref>{{Cite web|website=USA Today|url=http://books.usatoday.com/book/glenn-beck-harriet-parke-agenda-21/l48539|title=Agenda 21 By Glenn Beck, Harriet Parke|year=2012|url-status=live|archive-url=http://archive.wikiwix.com/cache/20120909085738/http://books.usatoday.com/book/glenn-beck-harriet-parke-agenda-21/l48539|archive-date=9 September 2012}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|website=Salon.com|url=http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/i_got_duped_by_glenn_beck/|date=19 November 2012|title=I got duped by Glenn Beck!|first=Sarah|last=Cypher|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150116103116/http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/i_got_duped_by_glenn_beck/|archive-date=16 January 2015}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|newspaper=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/best-sellers-books/2012-12-09/overview.html|date=9 December 2012|title=Best Sellers|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306212114/http://www.nytimes.com/best-sellers-books/2012-12-09/overview.html|archive-date=6 March 2016}}</ref> |
|||
===Europe=== |
===Europe=== |
||
The Rio+10 report<ref |
The Rio+10 report<ref name="20 years of Local Agenda 21"/> identified 5120 of local governments in Europe having a "Local Agenda 21". As most Europeans live in about 800 cities of +50.000 inhabitants, it is fair to say that just about all EU cities, communes and villages have a local Agenda 21. |
||
For example: |
For example: |
||
Line 140: | Line 142: | ||
* [[Think globally, act locally]] |
* [[Think globally, act locally]] |
||
* [[Waste management]] |
* [[Waste management]] |
||
* ''[[Our Common Future]]'' |
|||
== References == |
== References == |
Latest revision as of 16:52, 15 September 2024
This article needs additional citations for verification. (April 2019) |
Author | United Nations (1992) 29 years |
---|---|
Language | English, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, French, Spanish, Portuguese |
Genre | Non-fiction |
Publisher | United Nations |
Publication date | 23 April 1992 |
Publication place | United States |
Media type | Print (Paperback), HTML, PDF |
Pages | 300 pp |
ISBN | 978-92-1-100509-7 |
Agenda 21 is a non-binding action plan of the United Nations with regard to sustainable development.[1] It is a product of the Earth Summit (UN Conference on Environment and Development) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992. It is an action agenda for the UN, other multilateral organizations, and individual governments around the world that can be executed at local, national, and global levels. One major objective of the Agenda 21 initiative is that every local government should draw its own local Agenda 21. Its aim initially was to achieve global sustainable development by 2000, with the "21" in Agenda 21 referring to the original target of the 21st century.[2]
Structure
[edit]Agenda 21 is grouped into 4 sections:
- Section I: Social and Economic Dimensions is directed toward combating poverty, especially in developing countries, changing consumption patterns, promoting health, achieving a more sustainable population, and sustainable settlement in decision making.
- Section II: Conservation and Management of Resources for Development includes atmospheric protection, combating deforestation, protecting fragile environments, conservation of biological diversity (biodiversity), control of pollution and the management of biotechnology, and radioactive wastes.
- Section III: Strengthening the Role of Major Groups includes the roles of children and youth, women, NGOs, local authorities, business and industry, and workers; and strengthening the role of indigenous peoples, their communities, and farmers.
- Section IV: Means of Implementation includes science, technology transfer, education international institutions, and financial mechanisms.[2]
Development and evolution
[edit]The full text of Agenda 21 was made public at the UN Conference on Environment and Development (Earth Summit), held in Rio de Janeiro on 13 June 1992, where 178 governments voted to adopt the program. The final text was the result of drafting, consultation, and negotiation, beginning in 1989 and culminating at the two-week conference.[citation needed]
Rio+5 (1997)
[edit]In 1997, the UN General Assembly held a special session to appraise the status of Agenda 21 (Rio +5). The Assembly recognized progress as "uneven" and identified key trends, including increasing globalization, widening inequalities in income, and continued deterioration of the global environment. A new General Assembly Resolution (S-19/2) promised further action.[citation needed]
Rio+10 (2002)
[edit]The Johannesburg Plan of Implementation, agreed to at the World Summit on Sustainable Development (Earth Summit 2002), affirmed UN commitment to "full implementation" of Agenda 21, alongside achievement of the Millennium Development Goals and other international agreements.[citation needed]
Agenda 21 for culture (2002)
[edit]The first World Public Meeting on Culture, held in Porto Alegre, Brazil, in 2002, came up with the idea to establish guidelines for local cultural policies, something comparable to what Agenda 21 was for the environment.[3] They are to be included in various subsections of Agenda 21 and will be carried out through a wide range of sub-programs beginning with G8 countries.[citation needed]
Rio+20 (2012)
[edit]In 2012, at the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development the attending members reaffirmed their commitment to Agenda 21 in their outcome document called "The Future We Want". Leaders from 180 nations participated.[citation needed]
Sustainable Development Summit (2015)
[edit]Agenda 2030, also known as the Sustainable Development Goals, was a set of goals decided upon at the UN Sustainable Development Summit in 2015.[4] It takes all of the goals set by Agenda 21 and re-asserts them as the basis for sustainable development, saying, "We reaffirm all the principles of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development…"[5] Adding onto those goals from the original Rio document, a total of 17 goals have been agreed on, revolving around the same concepts of Agenda 21; people, planet, prosperity, peace, and partnership.[6]
Implementation
[edit]The Commission on Sustainable Development acts as a high-level forum on sustainable development and has acted as preparatory committee for summits and sessions on the implementation of Agenda 21. The UN Division for Sustainable Development acts as the secretariat to the Commission and works "within the context of" Agenda 21.[citation needed]
Implementation by member states remains voluntary, and its adoption has varied.[citation needed]
Local level
[edit]The implementation of Agenda 21 was intended to involve action at international, national, regional and local levels. Some national and state governments have legislated or advised that local authorities take steps to implement the plan locally, as recommended in Chapter 28 of the document. These programs are often known as "Local Agenda 21" or "LA21".[7] For example, in the Philippines, the plan is "Philippines Agenda 21" (PA21). The group, ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability, formed in 1990; today its members come from over 1,000 cities, towns, and counties in 88 countries and is widely regarded as a paragon of Agenda 21 implementation.[8]
Europe turned out to be the continent where LA21 was best accepted and most implemented.[9] In Sweden, for example, four small- to medium-sized municipalities in the south-east of Sweden were chosen for a 5-year study of their Local Agenda 21 (LA21) processes a Local Agenda 21 initiative.[10]
Regional levels
[edit]This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (June 2012) |
The UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs' Division for Sustainable Development monitors and evaluates progress, nation by nation, towards the adoption of Agenda 21, and makes these reports available to the public on its website.[11]
The Rio+10 report[12] identified over 6400 local governments in 113 countries worldwide that were engaged in Local Agenda 21 (LA21) activities, a more than three-fold increase over less than five years. 80% = 5120 of these local governments, were located in Europe. A significant increase has been noted in the number of countries in which one or more LA21 processes were underway.
Australia
[edit]Australia is a signatory to Agenda 21 and 88 of its municipalities subscribe to ICLEI, an organization that promotes Agenda 21 globally. Australia's membership is second only to that of the United States.[13]
Africa
[edit]In Africa, national support for Agenda 21 is strong and most countries are signatories. But support is often closely tied to environmental challenges specific to each country; for example, in 2002 Sam Nujoma, who was then President of Namibia, spoke about the importance of adhering to Agenda 21 at the 2002 Earth Summit, noting that as a semi-arid country, Namibia sets a lot of store in the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD).[14] Furthermore, there is little mention of Agenda 21 at the local level in indigenous media. Only major municipalities in sub-Saharan African countries are members of ICLEI. Agenda 21 participation in North African countries mirrors that of Middle Eastern countries, with most countries being signatories but little to no adoption on the local-government level. Countries in sub-Saharan Africa and North Africa generally have poorly documented Agenda 21 status reports.[citation needed] By contrast, South Africa's participation in Agenda 21 mirrors that of modern Europe, with 21 city members of ICLEI and support of Agenda 21 by national-level government.[citation needed]
North America
[edit]United States
[edit]The national focal point in the United States is the Division Chief for Sustainable Development and Multilateral Affairs, Office of Environmental Policy, Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, U.S. Department of State.[15] A June 2012 poll of 1,300 United States voters by the American Planning Association found that 9% supported Agenda 21, 6% opposed it, and 85% thought they didn't have enough information to form an opinion.[16]
Support
[edit]The United States is a signatory country to Agenda 21, but because Agenda 21 is a legally non-binding statement of intent and not a treaty, the United States Senate did not hold a formal debate or vote on it. It is therefore not considered to be law under Article Six of the United States Constitution. President George H. W. Bush was one of the 178 heads of government who signed the final text of the agreement at the Earth Summit in 1992,[17][18] and in the same year Representatives Nancy Pelosi, Eliot Engel and William Broomfield spoke in support of United States House of Representatives Concurrent Resolution 353, supporting implementation of Agenda 21 in the United States.[16][19] Created by Executive Order 12852 in 1993, the President's Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD) is explicitly charged with recommending a national action plan for sustainable development to the President.[20] The PCSD is composed of leaders from government and industry, as well as from environmental, labor and civil rights organizations. The PCSD submitted its report, "Sustainable America: A New Consensus", to the President in early 1996. In the absence of a multi-sectoral consensus on how to achieve sustainable development in the United States, the PCSD was conceived to formulate recommendations for the implementation of Agenda 21.[21] Executive Order 12852 was revoked by Executive Order 13138 in 1999.[22] The PCSD set 10 common goals to support the Agenda 21 movement:[23]
- Health and the environment
- Economic Prosperity
- Equity
- Conservation of nature
- Stewardship
- Sustainable communities
- Civic engagement
- Population
- International responsibility
- Education.
In the United States, over 528 cities are members of ICLEI, an international sustainability organization that helps to implement the Agenda 21 and Local Agenda 21 concepts across the world. The United States has nearly half of the ICLEI's global membership of 1,200 cities promoting sustainable development at a local level.[13] The United States also has one of the most comprehensively documented Agenda 21 status reports.[24] In response to the opposition, Don Knapp, U.S. spokesman for the ICLEI, has said "Sustainable development is not a top-down conspiracy from the U.N., but a bottom-up push from local governments".[16]
Opposition
[edit]Agenda 21 fears have played a role in opposition to local government's efforts to promote resource and land conservation, build bike lanes, and construct hubs for public transportation.[25] The non-profit group ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability USA – was targeted by anti-Agenda 21 activists.[25] In 2012, fears of Agenda 21 "went mainstream" when the Republican National Committee adopted a platform resolution stated that "We strongly reject the U.N. Agenda 21 as erosive of American sovereignty."[26][27]
Several state and local governments have considered or passed motions and legislation opposing Agenda 21.[8][16][27][28] Most such bills failed, "either dying in committee, getting defeated on the statehouse floor or – in the case of Missouri's 2013 bill – getting vetoed by the governor."[27] In Texas, for example, broadly worded legislation that would prohibit any governmental entity from accepting from or granting money to any "nongovernmental or intergovernmental organization accredited by the United Nations to implement a policy that originated in the Agenda 21 plan" was defeated because it could have cut off funding for groups such as 4-H, the Boy Scouts of America, and the Texas Wildlife Association.[27][29] In Arizona, a similarly sweeping bill was introduced in the Arizona State Legislature seeking to mandate that the state could not "adopt or implement the creed, doctrine, or principles or any tenet" of Agenda 21 and to prohibit the state "implementing programs of, expending any sum of money for, being a member of, receiving funding from, contracting services from, or giving financial or other forms of aid to" an array of sustainability organizations.[27] The bill, which was opposed by the state chamber of commerce and the mayor of Phoenix, was defeated in 2012.[27] Alabama was one state that did adopt an anti-Agenda 21 law, unanimously passing in 2012 a measure to block "any future effort to 'deliberately or inadvertently infringe or restrict private property rights without due process, as may be required by policy recommendations originating in, or traceable to 'Agenda 21.'"[27]
In 2023, Tennessee enacted legislation to block the implementation of Agenda 21 and other programs “originating in, or traceable to, the United Nations or a subsidiary entity of the United Nations.”[30][31]
Conspiracy theories
[edit]The right-wing John Birch Society described Agenda 21 as a plot, disguised as an environmental movement, to end individual freedom and establish a one-world government.[32][33] Activists believed that the non-binding UN resolution was "the linchpin in a plot to subjugate humanity under an eco-totalitarian regime."[27] The conspiracy had its roots in anti-environmentalist ideology and opposition to land-use regulation.[33]
Anti-Agenda 21 theories have circulated in the U.S. Some Tea Party movement activists and others promoted the notion that Agenda 21 was part of a UN plot to deny property rights, undermine U.S. sovereignty, or force citizens to move to cities.[25][27][8][16]
Glenn Beck warned that Agenda 21 was a "seditious" conspiracy to cut the world population by 85%.[32] He claimed it represents a move towards "government control on a global level" and the creation of a "police state" that would lead to "totalitarianism."[32] Beck described the dystopia it would cause if the world followed the UN plan in a 2012 novel he co-authored called Agenda 21.[34][35][36]
Europe
[edit]The Rio+10 report[12] identified 5120 of local governments in Europe having a "Local Agenda 21". As most Europeans live in about 800 cities of +50.000 inhabitants, it is fair to say that just about all EU cities, communes and villages have a local Agenda 21.
For example:
By 1997, 70% of UK local authorities had committed to Agenda 21.[37] Many, such as the London Borough of Enfield, employed Agenda 21 officers to promote the programme.[38]
Sweden reported that 100% of the municipalities had adopted LA21 by 2002.
France, whose national government, along with 14 cities, is a signatory, promotes nationwide programs in support of the goals of Agenda 21.[citation needed]
Baltic nations formed the Baltic 21 coalition as a regional expression of Agenda 21.[39]
See also
[edit]- Commission on Sustainable Development
- Ecologically sustainable development
- EarthCheck
- Global Map
- Glocalization
- Man and the Biosphere Programme
- Sustainable development goals (aka Agenda 2030)
- Think globally, act locally
- Waste management
- Our Common Future
References
[edit]- ^ "What is Agenda 21?". ICLEIUSA. Archived from the original on 12 December 2012. Retrieved 8 December 2012.
- ^ a b "Agenda 21" (PDF). sustainabledevelopment.un.org.
- ^ "Culture 21 – Agenda 21 for culture". www.agenda21culture.net. Archived from the original on 25 December 2009. Retrieved 27 April 2018.
- ^ "United Nations Sustainable Development Summit 2015 .:. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform". sustainabledevelopment.un.org. Archived from the original on 11 December 2017. Retrieved 6 December 2017.
- ^ "Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development .:. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform". sustainabledevelopment.un.org. Archived from the original on 5 December 2017. Retrieved 6 December 2017.
- ^ "Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015". www.un.org. Archived from the original on 10 November 2015. Retrieved 6 December 2017.
- ^ Manchester Metropolitan University Archived 22 July 2009 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ a b c Kaufman, Leslie; Kate Zernike (3 February 2012). "Activists Fight Green Projects, Seeing U.N. Plot". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 19 August 2012.
- ^ Smardon, Richard (2008). "A comparison of Local Agenda 21 implementation in North American, European and Indian cities". Management of Environmental Quality. 19 (1): 118–137. Bibcode:2008MEnvQ..19..118S. doi:10.1108/14777830810840408. Archived from the original on 11 June 2015. Retrieved 9 October 2013.
- ^ Jörby, Sofie (2002). "Local Agenda 21 in four Swedish Municipalities: a tool towards sustainability". Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 45 (2): 219–244. Bibcode:2002JEPM...45..219J. doi:10.1080/09640560220116314. S2CID 155038036.
- ^ UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. "Areas of Work – National Information by Country or Organization". United Nations. Archived from the original on 4 August 2012. Retrieved 15 August 2012.
- ^ a b "20 years of Local Agenda 21".
- ^ a b ICLEI. "ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability: Global Members". Archived from the original on 25 July 2012. Retrieved 15 August 2012.
- ^ "Namibian president calls for implementation of Agenda 21". Xinhua News Agency. 2 September 2002. Archived from the original on 15 January 2013. Retrieved 15 August 2012.
- ^ "United States of America". Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. United Nations. Archived from the original on 22 October 2013.
- ^ a b c d e "Tea Party Activists Fight Agenda 21, Seeing Threatening U.N. Plot". Huffington Post. 15 October 2012. Archived from the original on 18 October 2012. Retrieved 16 October 2012.
- ^ "Senators attack sustainable development, Agenda 21". The Courier-Journal. 20 February 2013. Archived from the original on 12 October 2013.
- ^ "Secret agenda at city hall?". Wyoming Tribune Eagle. 4 November 2012. Archived from the original on 12 October 2013.
- ^ Arnie Rosner (3 March 2012). "Agenda 21 Nancy Pelosi .mp4". Archived from the original on 23 March 2018. Retrieved 27 April 2018 – via YouTube.
- ^ States, President of the United. Executive Order 12852.
- ^ "Agenda 21, Op. Cit., Chapter 20.21(c), p. 201" (PDF). United Nations. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 November 2012.
- ^ States, President of the United. Executive Order 13138.
- ^ "Chapter 1". clintonwhitehouse4.archives.gov. Retrieved 23 November 2021.
- ^ "Agenda 21 – United States". www.un.org. Archived from the original on 8 October 2017. Retrieved 27 April 2018.
- ^ a b c Kaufman, Leslie; Kate Zernike (4 February 2012). "Activists Fight Green Projects, Seeing U.N. Plot". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 30 May 2013.
- ^ Jamison, Peter (30 August 2012). "Fears of Agenda 21 go mainstream in the Republican Party platform". Tampa Bay Times. Archived from the original on 3 November 2012. Retrieved 23 October 2012.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Harman, Greg (24 June 2015). "Agenda 21: a conspiracy theory puts sustainability in the crosshairs". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 26 June 2017.
- ^ Batheja, Aman (28 August 2012). "U.N.-Backed Agenda 21 Triggers Strong Reactions From Many in Texas". The Texas Tribune. Retrieved 17 January 2024.
- ^ Satija, Neena; McCrimmon, Ryan (26 February 2015). "Conservative Lawmakers Target United Nations". The Texas Tribune. Retrieved 17 January 2024.
- ^ "State of Tennessee Public Chapter No. 479" (PDF). Tennessee Secretary of State. Retrieved 17 January 2024.
- ^ Sullivan, Kevin (15 May 2023). "Inside the Tennessee legislature, where a GOP supermajority reigns". Washington Post. Retrieved 17 January 2024.
- ^ a b c "Agenda 21: The UN, Sustainability and Right-Wing Conspiracy Theory". Southern Poverty Law Center. 1 April 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2022.
- ^ a b Hinkes-Jones, Llewellyn (29 August 2012). "The Anti-Environmentalist Roots of the Agenda 21 Conspiracy Theory". Archived from the original on 1 October 2012. Retrieved 16 October 2012.
- ^ "Agenda 21 By Glenn Beck, Harriet Parke". USA Today. 2012. Archived from the original on 9 September 2012.
- ^ Cypher, Sarah (19 November 2012). "I got duped by Glenn Beck!". Salon.com. Archived from the original on 16 January 2015.
- ^ "Best Sellers". The New York Times. 9 December 2012. Archived from the original on 6 March 2016.
- ^ "House of Commons Hansard Written Answers for 20 May 1997 (pt 7)". publications.parliament.uk. Retrieved 1 July 2020.
- ^ "Enfield Council agenda 24th January, 2007" (PDF).
- ^ "Sustainable Development – Baltic 2030". cbss.org. Archived from the original on 15 November 2017. Retrieved 27 April 2018.
Bibliography
[edit]- Lenz, Ryan (Spring 2012). "Antigovernment Conspiracy Theorists Rail Against UN's Agenda 21 Program". Intelligence Report (145). Southern Poverty Law Center.
- Earth Summit 2012
External links
[edit]- "Agenda 21 text (pdf)" (PDF). unep.org.
- United Nations Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform
- Hoover, Kevin (5 May 2015). "Skeptoid #465: Agenda 21". Skeptoid.