Jump to content

Talk:Inkle (company): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Ralbegen moved page Talk:Inkle (video game company) to Talk:Inkle (company): Unnecessarily specific disambig
m WikiProject banner(s) moved/merged into {{WikiProject banner shell}} (Electronic literature)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Articles for creation |class=stub |ts=20141128014248 |reviewer=Winner 42}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|
{{WikiProject Video games |class=Stub |importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Articles for creation |ts=20141128014248 |reviewer=Winner 42}}
{{WikiProject Video games |class=C |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Electronic literature}}
}}


== ce Jan 18 ==
== ce Jan 18 ==

Latest revision as of 18:50, 23 September 2024

ce Jan 18

[edit]

despite > while. We don't want to suggest you normally can't win a Kirkus award without Guardian's approval.

two refs > one. If we make it one sentence all can be covered by the one ref.

spelling of "bewildering"

copyediting the latter sentence

CapnZapp (talk) 09:33, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]