Jump to content

Talk:'Ndrangheta: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Etymology section: new section
Tags: Reverted New topic
(24 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Italy|class=B|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Italy|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Crime|class=B|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=top|organizedcrime=yes|organizedcrime-imp=top}}
{{WikiProject Organized crime|class=b|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Secret Societies|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Secret Societies|class=B|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Australia|importance=low|crime=yes|crime-importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Australia|class=B|importance=low|crime=yes|crime-importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Organizations|importance=high}}
}}
}}

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=Talk:'Ndrangheta/Archive
|archiveprefix=Talk:'Ndrangheta/Archive
Line 18: Line 17:
}}
}}


== Baseless claims of monopoly ==
== Etymology section ==

"The etymological approach is criticised by some historians. John Dickie argues that "the flattering connotations of the word 'Ndrangheta (courage, martial prowess, manliness) indicate that the 'Ndrangheta as a social phenomenon was rooted in the same positive values, and that it only later degenerated into criminality." "


This bit does not seem to make much sense. The second sense seems to confirm the etymological approach, not criticize it.
There's a claim of a 'drug trafficking monopoly' without a source attached. [[Special:Contributions/90.224.238.95|90.224.238.95]] ([[User talk:90.224.238.95|talk]]) 09:27, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
[[User:Rodrigo braz|Rodrigo de Salvo Braz]] ([[User talk:Rodrigo braz|talk]]) 03:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:20, 28 September 2024

Etymology section

"The etymological approach is criticised by some historians. John Dickie argues that "the flattering connotations of the word 'Ndrangheta (courage, martial prowess, manliness) indicate that the 'Ndrangheta as a social phenomenon was rooted in the same positive values, and that it only later degenerated into criminality." "

This bit does not seem to make much sense. The second sense seems to confirm the etymological approach, not criticize it. Rodrigo de Salvo Braz (talk) 03:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]