Talk:Fornication: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 14:12, 29 September 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fornication article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 50 days

Sexology and sexuality Mid‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Mid‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 50 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

Same partial paragraph in 3 Wikipedia entries

As a result of a Google search, I discovered the same five-sentence text in three different entries: Fornication, Christian tradition and Infallibility of the Church. I don't have expertise in this subject area so perhaps someone who does could have a look and decide if it should be deleted from this entry. This is the text:

In his book, James F. Keenan reports studies by some academics. A study by Bernard Hoose states that claims to a continuous teaching by the Church on matters of sexuality, life and death and crime and punishment are "simply not true". After examining seven medieval text about homosexuality, Mark Jordan argues that, "far from being consistent, any attempt to make a connection among the texts proved impossible". He calls the tradition's teaching of the Church "incoherent". Karl-Wilhelm Merks considers that tradition itself is "not the truth guarantor of any particular teaching." Soperd (talk) 13:59, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Talk page}}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
-{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
-{{WP Sexuality|class=Start|importance=Mid}}
+{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality|importance=Mid}}
-{{WPReligion|class=Start|importance=Mid}}
+{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Mid}}
-{{ChristianityWikiProject|class=Start|importance=Mid}}
+{{WikiProject Christianity|importance=Mid}}
-{{WP Law|class=Start|importance=low}}
+{{WikiProject Law|importance=low}}
 }}
 {{User:MiszaBot/config
@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 {{Archives|auto=yes|search=yes}}
+== Same partial paragraph in 3 Wikipedia entries ==
-== Impt! Please clarify who are the "manualists" ==
+As a result of a Google search, I discovered the same five-sentence text in three different entries: [[Fornication]], [[Christian tradition]] and [[Infallibility of the Church]]. I don't have expertise in this subject area so perhaps someone who does could have a look and decide if it should be deleted from this entry. This is the text:
-On 12/07/21 the article referred to "manualists" without explaining who they are. I think it's important to fix this because (at least on that date) the "manualists" are part of the article that critiques the Catholic church. I'm agnostic and would really like to understand this critique and I'm sure I'm not the only one. [[User:Dovmiester|Dovmiester]] ([[User talk:Dovmiester|talk]]) 08:33, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
+In his book, [[James F. Keenan]] reports studies by some academics. A study by Bernard Hoose states that claims to a continuous teaching by the Church on matters of sexuality, life and death and crime and punishment are "simply not true". After examining seven medieval text about homosexuality, Mark Jordan argues that, "far from being consistent, any attempt to make a connection among the texts proved impossible". He calls the tradition's teaching of the Church "incoherent". Karl-Wilhelm Merks considers that [[Sacred tradition|tradition]] itself is "not the truth guarantor of any particular teaching." [[User:Soperd|Soperd]] ([[User talk:Soperd|talk]]) 13:59, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
-Though I'm unqualified to say much about manualism, I added what I learned from one good looking academic article. I intend it to be a placeholder for the comments of more qualified people, so I'm leaving this up in hopes of attracting y'all.  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dovmiester|Dovmiester]] ([[User talk:Dovmiester#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dovmiester|contribs]]) 06:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-P.S. My comment was " The manualists upheld manuals of moral theology that delineated "precepts (or norms, or rules of conduct) regarding the morality of a wide range of action"."  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dovmiester|Dovmiester]] ([[User talk:Dovmiester#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dovmiester|contribs]]) 06:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-:Your claim about Fuchs is not sourced. [[User:tgeorgescu|tgeorgescu]] ([[User talk:tgeorgescu|talk]])  13:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)