Jump to content

Talk:Telescope: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m Reverted 3 edits by 97.78.136.250 (talk) to last revision by Cewbot
(721 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=No|class=C|vital=yes|1=
I have remove the following statement, which I think correspond not to [[spherical aberration]] but [[field curvature]]. -- [[User:Looxix|looxix]] 19:33 Apr 21, 2003 (UTC)
{{WikiProject Astronomy |importance=Top}}
:''Some schmidt cassegrains have intentional spherical aberration, and compensate with a film-holder that stretches the film into a mild spherical shape.''
{{WikiProject Glass |importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Physics |importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Technology }}
}}


{{User:MiszaBot/config
The Telescope mountings para is largely incomplete lacks equatorial and meridian mount.
|archiveheader = {{atnhead|noredlinks=y}}
[[User:Ericd|Ericd]] 01:47 Apr 22, 2003 (UTC)
|maxarchivesize = 80K

|counter = 2
I am not conviced by :
|minthreadsleft = 0

|minthreadstoarchive = 0
"The phenomenon of optical diffraction sets a limit to the resolution and image quality that any telescope can achieve. We still do not know when this limit will be reached, but most astronomers believe we will reach it sooner or later."
|algo = old(120d)

|archive = Talk:Telescope/Archive %(counter)d
IMO diffraction occurs with a small apertures and research telescope have large apertures.
}}

{{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=no}}
But, I'm not a specialist.
[[User:Ericd|Ericd]] 17:56, 2 Oct 2003 (UTC)

:You can read about the influence of diffraction on resolution limits at the [[http://www.licha.de/AstroWeb/articles_fullsize.php3?iHowTo=16 link provided at the bottom of the page], but I'll clarify in the article. [[User:Nixdorf|Nixdorf]] 23:08, 3 Oct 2003 (UTC)

----
Would anyone be interested helping with a [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Telescopes]] and/or [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Space Telescopes]]? Should a telescopes template include space telescopes? It/they could be modeled after the following articles:

* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Astronomical Objects]]
* [[Hubble Space Telescope]]
* [[Spitzer Space Telescope]]
* [[Arecibo Radio Telescope]]

--[[User:Zandperl|zandperl]] 15:23, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)

----

The article doesn't seem to mention photography through telescopes. I'm not sure if it should, but I was looking for that. --[[User:Blades|blades]] 10:05, 30 May 2004 (UTC)

==Synthetic aperture vs adaptive optics==
It is my understanding that ''[[synthetic aperture]]'' refers to a technology for radio telescopes, while ''[[adaptive optics]]'' is an entirely different technology used for optical telescopes. But this article seems to use ''synthetic aperture'' for both. (It might even be using the term to cover interferometry, in one instance). Am I mistaken - does ''synthetic aperture'' apply to optical telescopes ? -[[User:Willmcw|Willmcw]] 06:47, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Umm, I am not an expert, but yes, both techniques are applicable to optical telescopes. Both are important and should be described. Briefly:

Adaptive optics refers to a set of techniques for distoring the received wavefront to correct for measured distortions along the optical path (e.g. effects of the atmosphere). They are being used with great success in many new telescopes.

Synthetic aperture refers to a set of techniques for combining information from several telescopes at one time or the same telescope at different places, for instance, to approach the resolution of a much larger physical telescope (one with a larger aperture). Synthetic aperture techniques have been employed for many years, with great success, in so called "sideways looking" radar and sonar systems, for instance. Optical and radio telescope arrays are synthetic aperture techniques.
--[[User:AJim|AJim]] 04:58, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Just linking the existing entry on ''[[Aperture Synthesis]]'' (AS) to the this discussion. AS as used in the ''[[Very Large Array]]'' allows the VLA to operate in at least 4 different modes (1) giving astromers varying magnification capabilities. A similar optical configuration is demonstrated in the ''[[Very Large Telescope]]''. This last case also uses ''[[Adaptive optics]]'' to cancel out atmospheric distortion to near exoatmospheric levels and aperture synthesis of up to four stand-alone telescopes.

A "third" technology being implemented in the ''[[James Webb Space Telescope]]'' boasts some interesting benefits. ''[[Active Optics]]'' (not the same as adaptive optics) allows the development on super-lightweight mirrors which can be collected together to perform as one larger unit. The JWST primary mirror is a system of eighteeen smaller mirrors (1.3m) which are phase-synchronized to produce the capabilty of a single larger unit. Just to quantify the gain, the JWST as reported by NASA, will be equipped with a primary mirror that has a diameter of 6.5m versus Hubble's Primary Mirror (2.5m)(2), yet 1/10th the weight. In fact, "if Hubble's [primary] mirror were scaled to match [that of the JWST] it would be unlaunchable. There isn't a launch system capable of supporting a [payload of the required size and in weight]"(2).


(1) - '[http://www.vla.nrao.edu/genpub/configs/ NRAO Very Large Array: Configurations]'

(2) - '[http://www.jwst.nasa.gov/OTE/mirrortale1.html NASA's James Webb Space Telescope Information Website]'.

--'[[User:CSR]]' 15:12 UTC, 051202

== Largest Telescope in 19th Century ==

I'm not sure if it's true, but I've often heard that the Ross Castle Telescope in [[Birr]], Ireland was the largest telescope for over 50 years (which 50 years is disputed :)). This information is on the Birr page in Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birr). Perhaps it would be good to explain how the 91-cm refracting telescope at Lick Observatory be bigger than the 72-inch reflector at Birr?
:Good catch. It may take some careful research and writing, but the difference may be between whether the telescopes are usable for science. There have been several large telescopes that were not usable. I understand that the Birr telescope was marginally useful, but someone else may have better information.-[[User:Willmcw|Willmcw]] 19:41, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

== Suggested changes ==

If no-one has any objections, I will copy the section "Famous optical telescopes" to the [[optical telescopes]] page, and alter the section on this one so it lists "Famous telescopes" (including non-optical telescopes e.g. Chandra, the VLA and ALMA). This would make the section better matched to the article. [[User:Rnt20|Rnt20]] 11:52, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:08, 30 September 2024

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Telescope&oldid=1248626908"