Jump to content

Energy Charter Treaty: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
m Dating maintenance tags: {{Better source}}
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 29: Line 29:
| remarks =
| remarks =
}}
}}
The '''Energy Charter Treaty''' ('''ECT''') is an [[international agreement]] that establishes a multilateral framework for cross-border cooperation in the [[energy industry]], principally the [[fossil fuel industry]]. The treaty covers all aspects of commercial energy activities including trade, transit, investments and [[Efficient energy use|energy efficiency]]. The treaty contains dispute resolution procedures both for States Parties to the Treaty (vis-à-vis other States) and as between States and the investors of other States, who have made investments in the territory of the former.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM:l27028|title=EUR-Lex - l27028 - EN - EUR-Lex|website=eur-lex.europa.eu}}</ref> Full versions of the treaty, both consolidated and official, are readily accessible.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Energy Charter Treaty|url=https://www.energycharter.org/process/energy-charter-treaty-1994/energy-charter-treaty/|access-date=2020-12-13|website=www.energycharter.org}}</ref>
The '''Energy Charter Treaty''' ('''ECT''') is an [[international agreement]] which establishes a multilateral framework for [[cross-border cooperation]] in the [[energy industry]], principally the [[fossil fuel industry]]. The treaty covers all aspects of commercial energy activities including trade, transit, investments and [[Efficient energy use|energy efficiency]]. The treaty contains dispute resolution procedures both for States Parties to the Treaty (vis-à-vis other States) and as between States and the investors of other States, who have made investments in the territory of the former.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM:l27028|title=EUR-Lex - l27028 - EN - EUR-Lex|website=eur-lex.europa.eu}}</ref> Full versions of the treaty, both consolidated and official, are readily accessible.<ref name=":7">{{Cite web|title=Energy Charter Treaty|url=https://www.energycharter.org/process/energy-charter-treaty-1994/energy-charter-treaty/|access-date=2020-12-13|website=www.energycharter.org}}</ref>


Initially, the Energy Charter process aimed to integrate the [[energy sector]]s of the [[Soviet Union]] and [[Eastern Europe]] at the end of the [[Cold War]] into the broader European and world markets. Its role, however, extends beyond east–west cooperation and, through legally binding instruments, free trade in global energy markets and non-discrimination to stimulate [[foreign direct investment]]s and global cross-border trade.
Initially, the Energy Charter process aimed to integrate the [[energy sector]]s of the [[Soviet Union]] and [[Eastern Europe]] at the end of the [[Cold War]] into the broader European and world markets. Its role, however, extends beyond east–west cooperation and, through legally binding instruments, free trade in global energy markets and non-discrimination to stimulate [[foreign direct investment]]s and global cross-border trade.
Line 37: Line 37:
The Energy Charter Treaty has been [[Energy Charter Treaty#Criticism|criticized]] for being a significant obstacle to enacting national policies to combat [[climate change]], and for actively disincentivizing national governments from compliance with recent international climate treaties such as the [[Paris Agreement]] due to the threat of significant financial loss.
The Energy Charter Treaty has been [[Energy Charter Treaty#Criticism|criticized]] for being a significant obstacle to enacting national policies to combat [[climate change]], and for actively disincentivizing national governments from compliance with recent international climate treaties such as the [[Paris Agreement]] due to the threat of significant financial loss.


{{As of|2023}}, numerous countries have either left or have announced plans to leave the ECT, with reports that the European Commission was planning legislation for the EU and all its member states to leave the ECT simultaneously.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |date=2022-10-20 |title=EU tries to stop energy treaty exit stampede |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-tries-to-stop-energy-treaty-exit-stampede/ |access-date=2023-07-10 |website=POLITICO |language=en}}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite web |date=2023-07-07 |title=EU moves to quit energy investment treaty |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/energy-charter-treaty-ect-investment-europe-quit/|website=POLITICO |language=en}}</ref>
{{As of|2023}}, numerous countries have either left or have announced plans to leave the ECT. The [[European Union]] and [[Euratom]] took the final and formal step of exiting the Energy Charter Treaty, which will take effect one year after the depository has received the notification.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Energy Charter Treaty: EU notifies its withdrawal |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/06/27/energy-charter-treaty-eu-notifies-its-withdrawal/}}</ref>


==History==
==History==

===European Energy Charter===
===European Energy Charter===

The beginnings of the Energy Charter date back to a political initiative launched in Europe in the early 1990s. The end of the [[Cold War]] offered an unprecedented opportunity to overcome previous economic divisions between the nations on both sides of the [[Iron Curtain]]. The brightest prospect for mutually co-dependent beneficial cooperation was the [[Energy industry|energy sector]], given [[Russia in the European energy sector|Europe's growing energy demand]] and [[Energy superpower|vast resource availability in post-Soviet nations]]. Additionally, there was a recognised need to establish a commonly accepted foundation for energy cooperation among the states of [[Eurasia]]. By these considerations, the Energy Charter process was born.<ref name=konoplyanik>
The beginnings of the Energy Charter date back to a political initiative launched in Europe in the early 1990s. The end of the [[Cold War]] offered an unprecedented opportunity to overcome previous economic divisions between the nations on both sides of the [[Iron Curtain]]. The brightest prospect for mutually co-dependent beneficial cooperation was the [[Energy industry|energy sector]], given [[Russia in the European energy sector|Europe's growing energy demand]] and [[Energy superpower|vast resource availability in post-Soviet nations]]. Additionally, there was a recognised need to establish a commonly accepted foundation for energy cooperation among the states of [[Eurasia]]. By these considerations, the Energy Charter process was born.<ref name=konoplyanik>
{{cite journal
{{cite journal
Line 121: Line 119:
* Nathalie Bernasconi-Osterwalder, a lawyer at the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), criticises the ECT for not having "more precise definitions of investment protection standards, [for not] set[ting] out responsibilities for investors and [for not] integrat[ing] innovations with respect to dispute settlement to ensure transparency and independence," unlike more modern approaches. Moreover, she claims it is following expansionist ambitions.<ref>{{Cite web| first=Nathalie| last= Bernasconi-Osterwalder | title = Expansion of the Energy Charter to Africa and Asia: Undoing Reform in International Investment Law?, 2017 |url = https://www.iisd.org/itn/2017/06/12/expansion-energy-charter-ect-africa-asia-undoing-reform-international-investment-law-nathalie-bernasconi-osterwalder/|website = International Institute for Sustainable Development|access-date = 9 September 2019}}</ref>
* Nathalie Bernasconi-Osterwalder, a lawyer at the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), criticises the ECT for not having "more precise definitions of investment protection standards, [for not] set[ting] out responsibilities for investors and [for not] integrat[ing] innovations with respect to dispute settlement to ensure transparency and independence," unlike more modern approaches. Moreover, she claims it is following expansionist ambitions.<ref>{{Cite web| first=Nathalie| last= Bernasconi-Osterwalder | title = Expansion of the Energy Charter to Africa and Asia: Undoing Reform in International Investment Law?, 2017 |url = https://www.iisd.org/itn/2017/06/12/expansion-energy-charter-ect-africa-asia-undoing-reform-international-investment-law-nathalie-bernasconi-osterwalder/|website = International Institute for Sustainable Development|access-date = 9 September 2019}}</ref>
* Tania Voon, a Professor in Law at the University of Melbourne, criticises the modernization of the ECT for not including a removal of the art. 47 survival clause, and for failing to introduce "a distinction between investments based on [[fossil fuels]] and those based on renewable energy" in order to achieve climate goals.<ref>{{cite web | first1= Tania| last1=Voon |url=https://www.iisd.org/itn/2019/10/02/modernizing-the-energy-charter-treaty-what-about-termination-tania-voon/|title=Modernizing the Energy Charter Treaty: What about termination? In: International Investment News, October Special Edition: "International Investment Governance" available in English, Français and Español |website = International Institute for Sustainable Development| date=2 October 2019 |access-date=6 November 2019 }}</ref>
* Tania Voon, a Professor in Law at the University of Melbourne, criticises the modernization of the ECT for not including a removal of the art. 47 survival clause, and for failing to introduce "a distinction between investments based on [[fossil fuels]] and those based on renewable energy" in order to achieve climate goals.<ref>{{cite web | first1= Tania| last1=Voon |url=https://www.iisd.org/itn/2019/10/02/modernizing-the-energy-charter-treaty-what-about-termination-tania-voon/|title=Modernizing the Energy Charter Treaty: What about termination? In: International Investment News, October Special Edition: "International Investment Governance" available in English, Français and Español |website = International Institute for Sustainable Development| date=2 October 2019 |access-date=6 November 2019 }}</ref>
* Cross-party members of the European Parliament advised the commission to withdraw if modernization is not adequate.<ref>{{cite web | first1= Elena| last1=Sánchez Nicolás |url=https://euobserver.com/energy/149843 |title=MEPs urge EU to be ready to dump disputed energy treaty |website = EU Observer |access-date=23 October 2020 }}</ref>
* Cross-party members of the European Parliament advised the commission to withdraw if modernization is not adequate.<ref>{{cite web | first1= Elena| last1=Sánchez Nicolás |url=https://euobserver.com/energy/149843 |title=MEPs urge EU to be ready to dump disputed energy treaty |website = EU Observer | date=23 October 2020 |access-date=23 October 2020 }}</ref>


===Energy efficiency===
===Energy efficiency===
Line 149: Line 147:


===Members of the Energy Charter Conference===
===Members of the Energy Charter Conference===
Source:<ref name=":7" />

{{columns-list|colwidth=10em|
{{columns-list|colwidth=10em|
*{{flagcountry|Afghanistan}}
*{{flagcountry|Afghanistan}}
Line 155: Line 155:
*{{flagcountry|Austria}}
*{{flagcountry|Austria}}
*{{flagcountry|Azerbaijan}}
*{{flagcountry|Azerbaijan}}
*{{flagcountry|Belarus}}{{nnbsp}}*{{nnbsp}}<ref name="Belarus">{{Cite web|url=https://www.energycharter.org/index.php?id=291&L=1%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C|title=63. JKX Oil & Gas, et al v. Ukraine - Energy Charter|website=www.energycharter.org|access-date=19 December 2019|archive-date=7 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210207031317/https://www.energycharter.org/index.php?id=291&L=1%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C|url-status=dead}}</ref>
*{{flagcountry|Belarus}}{{nnbsp}}* (suspended on 24 June 2022).{{nnbsp}}<ref name="Belarus">{{Cite web|url=https://www.energycharter.org/index.php?id=291&L=1%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C|title=63. JKX Oil & Gas, et al v. Ukraine - Energy Charter|website=www.energycharter.org|access-date=19 December 2019|archive-date=7 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210207031317/https://www.energycharter.org/index.php?id=291&L=1%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C|url-status=dead}}</ref>
*{{flagcountry|Belgium}}
*{{flagcountry|Belgium}}
*{{flagcountry|Bosnia and Herzegovina}}
*{{flagcountry|Bosnia and Herzegovina}}
*{{flagcountry|Bulgaria}}
*{{flagcountry|Bulgaria}}
*{{flagcountry|Czech Republic}}
*{{flagcountry|Croatia}}
*{{flagcountry|Croatia}}
*{{flagcountry|Cyprus}}
*{{flagcountry|Cyprus}}
*{{flagcountry|Czech Republic}}
*{{flagcountry|Denmark}} {{symbol|segnale_generico.svg|link=no}}
*{{flagcountry|Denmark}} {{symbol|segnale_generico.svg|link=no}}
*{{flagcountry|Estonia}}
*{{flagcountry|Estonia}}
*{{flagicon|European Union}} [[Euratom]]
*{{flagicon|European Union}} [[Euratom]] {{symbol|segnale_generico.svg|link=no}} (withdrawal effective on 28 June 2025)
*{{flagcountry|European Union}}
*{{flagcountry|European Union}} {{symbol|segnale_generico.svg|link=no}} (withdrawal effective on 28 June 2025)
*{{flagcountry|France}} {{symbol|segnale_generico.svg|link=no}}
*{{flagcountry|Finland}}
*{{flagcountry|Finland}}
*{{flagcountry|Georgia}}
*{{flagcountry|Georgia}}
*{{flagcountry|Germany}} {{symbol|segnale_generico.svg|link=no}}
*{{flagcountry|Greece}}
*{{flagcountry|Greece}}
*{{flagcountry|Hungary}}
*{{flagcountry|Hungary}}
*{{flagcountry|Ireland}}
*{{flagcountry|Iceland}}
*{{flagcountry|Iceland}}
*{{flagcountry|Ireland}}
*{{flagcountry|Japan}}
*{{flagcountry|Japan}}
*{{flagcountry|Jordan}}
*{{flagcountry|Kazakhstan}}
*{{flagcountry|Kazakhstan}}
*{{flagcountry|Kyrgyzstan}}
*{{flagcountry|Kyrgyzstan}}
*{{flagcountry|Lithuania}}
*{{flagcountry|Luxembourg}} {{symbol|segnale_generico.svg|link=no}}
*{{flagcountry|Latvia}}
*{{flagcountry|Latvia}}
*{{flagcountry|Liechtenstein}}
*{{flagcountry|Liechtenstein}}
*{{flagcountry|Lithuania}}
*{{flagcountry|Malta}}
*{{flagcountry|Malta}}
*{{flagcountry|Moldova}}
*{{flagcountry|Moldova}}
*{{flagcountry|Mongolia}}
*{{flagcountry|Mongolia}}
*{{flagcountry|Montenegro}}
*{{flagcountry|Montenegro}}
*{{flagcountry|Netherlands}} {{symbol|segnale_generico.svg|link=no}}
*{{flagcountry|Netherlands}} {{symbol|segnale_generico.svg|link=no}} (withdrawal effective on 28 June 2025)
*{{flagcountry|North Macedonia}}
*{{flagcountry|North Macedonia}}
*{{flagcountry|Norway}}{{nnbsp}}*
*{{flagcountry|Norway}}{{nnbsp}}*
*{{flagcountry|Poland}} {{symbol|segnale_generico.svg|link=no}}
*{{flagcountry|Portugal}} {{symbol|segnale_generico.svg|link=no}} (withdrawal effective on 2 February 2025)
*{{flagcountry|Portugal}} {{symbol|segnale_generico.svg|link=no}}
*{{flagcountry|Romania}}
*{{flagcountry|Romania}}
*{{flagcountry|Slovakia}}
*{{flagcountry|Slovakia}}
*{{flagcountry|Slovenia}} {{symbol|segnale_generico.svg|link=no}}
*{{flagcountry|Slovenia}} {{symbol|segnale_generico.svg|link=no}} (withdrawal effective on 14 October 2024)
*{{flagcountry|Spain}} {{symbol|segnale_generico.svg|link=no}} (withdrawal effective on 17 April 2025)
*{{flagcountry|Sweden}}
*{{flagcountry|Sweden}}
*{{flagcountry|Spain}} {{symbol|segnale_generico.svg|link=no}}
*{{flagcountry|Switzerland}}
*{{flagcountry|Switzerland}}
*{{flagcountry|Tajikistan}}
*{{flagcountry|Tajikistan}}
Line 200: Line 197:
*{{flagcountry|Turkmenistan}}
*{{flagcountry|Turkmenistan}}
*{{flagcountry|Ukraine}}
*{{flagcountry|Ukraine}}
*{{flagcountry|United Kingdom}}
*{{flagcountry|United Kingdom}} {{symbol|segnale_generico.svg|link=no}} (withdrawal effective on 27 April 2025)
*{{flagcountry|Uzbekistan}}
*{{flagcountry|Uzbekistan}}
*{{flagcountry|Yemen}}
}}
}}


Russia and Australia provisionally applied the treaty, but indicated the end of the provisional application period in 2009 and 2021 respectively. Italy was a party to the treaty from 1998 until 2016. In October 2022, a minister from the Netherlands announced his intention to facilitate withdrawal from the treaty.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://nos.nl/artikel/2448937-minister-jetten-nederland-stapt-uit-omstreden-energieverdrag |title=Minister Jetten: Nederland stapt uit omstreden energieverdrag |trans-title=Minister Jetten: the Netherlands to withdraw from controversial energy treaty |language=Dutch |date=18 October 2022 |access-date=18 October 2022}}</ref> On 21{{nbsp}}October 2022, French President Emmanuel Macron also announced France's withdrawal from the treaty.<ref>https://www.francetvinfo.fr/meteo/climat/climat-emmanuel-macron-annonce-que-la-france-va-se-retirer-du-traite-sur-la-charte-de-l-energie-juge-incompatible-avec-les-objectifs-de-l-accord-de-paris_5431750.html</ref><ref>https://www.politico.eu/article/france-to-leave-energy-charter-treaty-says-macron/</ref> One month later, the German government also expressed its intent to leave the accord.<ref name="dw-2022">
Russia and Australia provisionally applied the treaty, but indicated the end of the provisional application period in 2009 and 2021 respectively. Italy was a party to the treaty from 1998 until 2016. In October 2022, a minister from the Netherlands announced his intention to facilitate withdrawal from the treaty.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://nos.nl/artikel/2448937-minister-jetten-nederland-stapt-uit-omstreden-energieverdrag |title=Minister Jetten: Nederland stapt uit omstreden energieverdrag |trans-title=Minister Jetten: the Netherlands to withdraw from controversial energy treaty |language=Dutch |date=18 October 2022 |access-date=18 October 2022}}</ref> On 21{{nbsp}}October 2022, French President Emmanuel Macron also announced France's withdrawal from the treaty.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.francetvinfo.fr/meteo/climat/climat-emmanuel-macron-annonce-que-la-france-va-se-retirer-du-traite-sur-la-charte-de-l-energie-juge-incompatible-avec-les-objectifs-de-l-accord-de-paris_5431750.html | title=Climat : Emmanuel Macron annonce que la France va se retirer du Traité sur la charte de l'énergie, jugé incompatible avec les objectifs de l'accord de Paris | date=21 October 2022 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.politico.eu/article/france-to-leave-energy-charter-treaty-says-macron/ | title=France to leave Energy Charter Treaty, says Macron | date=21 October 2022 }}</ref> One month later, the German government also expressed its intent to leave the accord.<ref name="dw-2022">
{{cite web
{{cite web
| title = Germany to pull out of fossil fuel treaty
| title = Germany to pull out of fossil fuel treaty
Line 289: Line 287:
=== Former members ===
=== Former members ===


* {{flagcountry|Italy}} (signed 1991, withdrawn 2016)<ref>{{Cite web|title=Italy - Energy Charter|url=https://www.energycharter.org/who-we-are/members-observers/countries/italy/|access-date=2020-12-19|website=www.energycharter.org}}</ref>
* {{FRA|#}} (signed 1991, withdrawn 2023)<ref name=":4">{{cite web |access-date=2024-04-14 |title=France Energy Charter |url=https://www.energycharter.org/who-we-are/members-observers/countries/france/}}<!-- auto-translated from German by Module:CS1 translator --></ref>
* {{DEU|#}} (signed 1991, withdrawn 2023)<ref name=":5">{{cite web |access-date=2024-04-14 |title=Germany – Energy Charter |url=https://www.energycharter.org/who-we-are/members-observers/countries/germany/}}<!-- auto-translated from German by Module:CS1 translator --></ref>
* {{flagcountry|Italy}} (signed 1991, withdrawn 2016)<ref>{{Cite web |title=Italy - Energy Charter |url=https://www.energycharter.org/who-we-are/members-observers/countries/italy/ |access-date=2020-12-19 |website=www.energycharter.org}}</ref>
* {{LUX|#}} (signed 1991, withdrawn 2024)
* {{POL|#}} (signed 1991, withdrawn 2023)<ref name=":6">{{cite web |access-date=2024-04-14 |title=Poland – Energy Charter |url=https://www.energycharter.org/who-we-are/members-observers/countries/poland/}}<!-- auto-translated from German by Module:CS1 translator --></ref>


===Russian participation===
===Russian participation===
{{See also|Russia in the European energy sector|Energy policy of Russia}}
{{See also|Russia in the European energy sector|Energy policy of Russia}}
The Russian Federation signed the treaty and applied it provisionally but did not ratify it. It linked the ratification of the treaty to negotiations on an Energy Charter Transit Protocol. In October 2006, German chancellor [[Angela Merkel]] and French president [[Jacques Chirac]] proposed the creation of a ''balanced energy partnership'' between France and Germany, representing the [[European Union]], and Russia. Under the agreement, Russia would have to sign the European Energy Charter, which Russian President [[Vladimir Putin]] has said impinges on Russia's national interests.<ref>Michael Schwirtz (13 October 2006), [https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9504E2D81130F930A25753C1A9609C8B63 Putin Must Eye Energy Plan of Germany and France] ''[[The New York Times]]''.</ref>{{better source|date=September 2023}}
The Russian Federation signed the treaty and applied it provisionally but did not ratify it. It linked the ratification of the treaty to negotiations on an Energy Charter Transit Protocol. In October 2006, German chancellor [[Angela Merkel]] and French president [[Jacques Chirac]] proposed the creation of a ''balanced energy partnership'' between France and Germany, representing the [[European Union]], and Russia. Under the agreement, Russia would have to sign the European Energy Charter, which, according to a ''New York Times'' summary of a report in Russian newspaper ''[[Kommersant]]'', Russian President [[Vladimir Putin]] said impinges on Russia's national interests.<ref>{{cite news| title=MERKEL RESPONDS TO PUTIN'S ENERGY PROPOSAL|newspaper=Kommersant| via=The New York Times | date=13 October 2006 | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/13/world/europe/13russiansumm.html | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230409154906/https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/13/world/europe/13russiansumm.html | archive-date=9 April 2023 | url-status=live |url-access=subscription}}</ref>


In December 2006, Russia indicated that the ratification of the treaty was unlikely due to the provisions requiring third-party access to Russia's pipelines.<ref>[http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/12/news/energy.php Russia gets tough on energy sales to Europe: No foreign access to pipelines, official says], by Judy Dempsey, [[International Herald Tribune]] 12 December 2006</ref> On 20 August 2009, it officially informed the depository of the treaty ([[Government of Portugal]]) that it did not intend to become a contracting party to the treaty and the related protocol terminating the provisional application of the treaty and the PEEREA starting from 18 October 2009.<ref name=skadden>{{cite web |work=[[Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom]] |title=Arbitration Panel Holds That the 1994 Energy Charter Treaty Protects Foreign Energy Sector Investments in Former Soviet Union |date=5 February 2010 | url= https://www.skadden.com/insights/arbitration-panel-holds-1994-energy-charter-treaty-protects-foreign-energy-sector-investmen |access-date=8 May 2010 |url-status= live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110716080855/https://www.skadden.com/content/Publications/Publications1978_0.pdf |archive-date=16 July 2011 }}</ref>
In December 2006, Russia indicated that the ratification of the treaty was unlikely due to the provisions requiring third-party access to Russia's pipelines.<ref>[http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/12/news/energy.php Russia gets tough on energy sales to Europe: No foreign access to pipelines, official says], by Judy Dempsey, [[International Herald Tribune]] 12 December 2006</ref> On 20 August 2009, it officially informed the depository of the treaty ([[Government of Portugal]]) that it did not intend to become a contracting party to the treaty and the related protocol terminating the provisional application of the treaty and the PEEREA starting from 18 October 2009.<ref name=skadden>{{cite web |work=[[Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom]] |title=Arbitration Panel Holds That the 1994 Energy Charter Treaty Protects Foreign Energy Sector Investments in Former Soviet Union |date=5 February 2010 | url= https://www.skadden.com/insights/arbitration-panel-holds-1994-energy-charter-treaty-protects-foreign-energy-sector-investmen |access-date=8 May 2010 |url-status= live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110716080855/https://www.skadden.com/content/Publications/Publications1978_0.pdf |archive-date=16 July 2011 }}</ref>
Line 300: Line 302:


In July 2014, the international arbitration panel in The Hague unanimously ruled in favour of the shareholders, awarding $50 billion damages for the seizure of assets and dismantling of Yukos.<ref>{{Cite web|title = Russia Stole Yukos and Owes $50 Billion, International Panel Rules|url = https://foreignpolicy.com/2014/07/28/russia-stole-yukos-and-owes-50-billion-international-panel-rules/|website = Foreign Policy|access-date = 2015-09-28}}</ref> The Russian government has vowed not to comply with the ruling, setting off an international legal dispute which has resulted in France and Belgium seizing Russian assets for possible use as restitution for the claimants.<ref>{{Cite web|title = What's Really Happening With the Yukos Case|url = https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/06/19/whats-really-happening-with-the-yukos-case-russia-putin-belgium-france/|website = Foreign Policy|access-date = 2015-09-28}}</ref> However, a French court ruled against the seizure by the French authorities,<ref>{{Cite web|title = French court rules in favor of Russia's Roscosmos in Yukos assets seizure case|url = http://www.bilaterals.org/?french-court-rules-in-favor-of&lang=en|website = Bilaterals.org|access-date = 2016-04-12}}</ref> and a Dutch court later overturned the $50 billion ruling, arguing Russia had not ratified the Energy Charter Treaty and so was not bound by it.<ref>{{Cite web|title = Dutch court overturns $50 billion ruling against Russia in Yukos case|url = http://www.bilaterals.org/?dutch-court-overturns-50-billion&lang=en|website = Bilaterals.org|access-date = 2016-04-21}}</ref>
In July 2014, the international arbitration panel in The Hague unanimously ruled in favour of the shareholders, awarding $50 billion damages for the seizure of assets and dismantling of Yukos.<ref>{{Cite web|title = Russia Stole Yukos and Owes $50 Billion, International Panel Rules|url = https://foreignpolicy.com/2014/07/28/russia-stole-yukos-and-owes-50-billion-international-panel-rules/|website = Foreign Policy|access-date = 2015-09-28}}</ref> The Russian government has vowed not to comply with the ruling, setting off an international legal dispute which has resulted in France and Belgium seizing Russian assets for possible use as restitution for the claimants.<ref>{{Cite web|title = What's Really Happening With the Yukos Case|url = https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/06/19/whats-really-happening-with-the-yukos-case-russia-putin-belgium-france/|website = Foreign Policy|access-date = 2015-09-28}}</ref> However, a French court ruled against the seizure by the French authorities,<ref>{{Cite web|title = French court rules in favor of Russia's Roscosmos in Yukos assets seizure case|url = http://www.bilaterals.org/?french-court-rules-in-favor-of&lang=en|website = Bilaterals.org|access-date = 2016-04-12}}</ref> and a Dutch court later overturned the $50 billion ruling, arguing Russia had not ratified the Energy Charter Treaty and so was not bound by it.<ref>{{Cite web|title = Dutch court overturns $50 billion ruling against Russia in Yukos case|url = http://www.bilaterals.org/?dutch-court-overturns-50-billion&lang=en|website = Bilaterals.org|access-date = 2016-04-21}}</ref>

==Case law==
==Case law==
===Renewable energy investment cases in Spain===
===Renewable energy investment cases in Spain===
Line 394: Line 395:


===Monitor ECT and PEEREA obligations===
===Monitor ECT and PEEREA obligations===
Article 19 of the treaty, requires that each Contracting Party minimise, in an economically efficient manner, harmful environmental impacts arising from energy use.<ref>{{Cite report|url=http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/document/EN.pdf|date=September 2004|title=The Energy Charter Treaty and Related Documents - A Legal Framework for International Energy Cooperation|publisher=Energy Charter Secretariat|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20131024073327/http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/document/EN.pdf |archive-date=24 October 2013|url-status=dead }}</ref> The Secretariat monitors the enforcement of these obligations in the contracting parties of the treaty and creates various publicly available reports on each of the contracting parties such as [[Efficient energy use|energy efficiency]]<ref>http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/BiH_EE_2012_ENG.pdf {{Dead link|date=February 2022|fix-attempted=yes}}</ref> and the investment<ref>http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Poland_ICMS_2011_ENG.pdf {{Dead link|date=February 2022|fix-attempted=yes}}</ref> climate.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.encharter.org/index.php?id=20&L=0 |title=Energy Charter: Publications |access-date=31 August 2012 |archive-date=22 July 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120722002920/http://www.encharter.org/index.php?id=20&L=0 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
Article 19 of the treaty, requires that each Contracting Party minimise, in an economically efficient manner, harmful environmental impacts arising from energy use.<ref>{{Cite report|url=http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/document/EN.pdf|date=September 2004|title=The Energy Charter Treaty and Related Documents - A Legal Framework for International Energy Cooperation|publisher=Energy Charter Secretariat|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131024073327/http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/document/EN.pdf |archive-date=24 October 2013|url-status=dead }}</ref> The Secretariat monitors the enforcement of these obligations in the contracting parties of the treaty and creates various publicly available reports on each of the contracting parties such as [[Efficient energy use|energy efficiency]]<ref>http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/BiH_EE_2012_ENG.pdf {{Dead link|date=February 2022|fix-attempted=yes}}</ref> and the investment<ref>http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Poland_ICMS_2011_ENG.pdf {{Dead link|date=February 2022|fix-attempted=yes}}</ref> climate.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.encharter.org/index.php?id=20&L=0 |title=Energy Charter: Publications |access-date=31 August 2012 |archive-date=22 July 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120722002920/http://www.encharter.org/index.php?id=20&L=0 |url-status=dead }}</ref>


===Legal support===
===Legal support===
Line 441: Line 442:


== Calls and plans for withdrawal ==
== Calls and plans for withdrawal ==
Several countries and organisations have proposed withdrawing from the ECT. However, the Treaty has a "sunset clause" that allows lawsuits to be filed for 20 years after the departure of a member; Italy left the ECT in 2015, but was successfully sued in 2022.<ref name=":3"/>
Several countries and organisations have proposed withdrawing from the ECT. However, the Treaty has a "sunset clause" that allows lawsuits to be filed for 20 years after the departure of a member; Italy left the ECT in 2015, but was successfully sued in 2022.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web |date=2023-07-07 |title=EU moves to quit energy investment treaty |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/energy-charter-treaty-ect-investment-europe-quit/ |website=POLITICO |language=en}}</ref>


In 2020, [[Julia Steinberger]] and Yamina Saheb (both co-authors of the [[IPCC Sixth Assessment Report]])<ref>{{Cite web|title=Working Group III contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6-WG3)|url=https://archive.ipcc.ch/report/authors/report.authors.php?q=37&p=&p|access-date=2020-12-13}}</ref> initiated an open letter that calls for the withdrawal from the ECT.<ref>{{Cite web|title=End Fossil Protection|url=https://www.endfossilprotection.org/|access-date=2020-12-13|website=www.endfossilprotection.org}}</ref> They justify the call with the claim that the ECT is an obstacle to the [[Paris Agreement]] and the [[European Green Deal]]. The letter has been signed, for example, by [[Sandrine Dixson-Declève]], [[Connie Hedegaard]], [[James K. Galbraith]], Helga Kromp-Kolb, [[Rachel Kyte]], [[Thomas Piketty]], [[Olivier De Schutter|Olivier de Schutter]] and [[Jean-Pascal van Ypersele]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Von Kromp-Kolb bis Piketty: Wissenschaftler*innen fordern Ausstieg aus Energiecharta-Vertrag|url=https://www.attac.at/news/details/von-kromp-kolb-bis-piketty-wissenschaftlerinnen-fordern-ausstieg-aus-dem-energiecharta-vertrag|access-date=2020-12-13|website=www.attac.at|language=de-DE}}</ref>
In 2020, [[Julia Steinberger]] and Yamina Saheb (both co-authors of the [[IPCC Sixth Assessment Report]])<ref>{{Cite web|title=Working Group III contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6-WG3)|url=https://archive.ipcc.ch/report/authors/report.authors.php?q=37&p=&p|access-date=2020-12-13}}</ref> initiated an open letter that calls for the withdrawal from the ECT.<ref>{{Cite web|title=End Fossil Protection|url=https://www.endfossilprotection.org/|access-date=2020-12-13|website=www.endfossilprotection.org}}</ref> They justify the call with the claim that the ECT is an obstacle to the [[Paris Agreement]] and the [[European Green Deal]]. The letter has been signed, for example, by [[Sandrine Dixson-Declève]], [[Connie Hedegaard]], [[James K. Galbraith]], Helga Kromp-Kolb, [[Rachel Kyte]], [[Thomas Piketty]], [[Olivier De Schutter|Olivier de Schutter]] and [[Jean-Pascal van Ypersele]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Von Kromp-Kolb bis Piketty: Wissenschaftler*innen fordern Ausstieg aus Energiecharta-Vertrag|url=https://www.attac.at/news/details/von-kromp-kolb-bis-piketty-wissenschaftlerinnen-fordern-ausstieg-aus-dem-energiecharta-vertrag|access-date=2020-12-13|website=www.attac.at|date=9 December 2020 |language=de-DE}}</ref>
On 15 December 2020, the Spanish [[Ministry of Environment (Spain)|minister for ecological transition]], [[Teresa Ribera]], supported the idea of withdrawing from it if it was not possible to reach an agreement to make the Energy Charter Treaty compatible with the [[Paris Agreement]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-12-18|title=The obscure energy pact that threatens the EU's Green Deal|url=https://www.politico.eu/article/energy-charter-treaty-threatens-eu-green-deal/|access-date=2021-01-14|website=POLITICO}}</ref> The [[International Institute for Sustainable Development]] describes the possibility of a withdrawal with neutralization of the survival clause.<ref name="bernasconi-osterwalder-2022">
On 15 December 2020, the Spanish [[Ministry of Environment (Spain)|minister for ecological transition]], [[Teresa Ribera]], supported the idea of withdrawing from it if it was not possible to reach an agreement to make the Energy Charter Treaty compatible with the [[Paris Agreement]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-12-18|title=The obscure energy pact that threatens the EU's Green Deal|url=https://www.politico.eu/article/energy-charter-treaty-threatens-eu-green-deal/|access-date=2021-01-14|website=POLITICO}}</ref> The [[International Institute for Sustainable Development]] describes the possibility of a withdrawal with neutralization of the survival clause.<ref name="bernasconi-osterwalder-2022">
{{cite web
{{cite web
Line 455: Line 456:
| language = en-US
| language = en-US
}}</ref>
}}</ref>

The UK government announced in September 2023 that it would consider leaving the "outdated" treaty if modernisation was not agreed by that November.<ref>{{cite web | title=UK reviewing membership of energy treaty |publisher=UK Government Department for Energy Security and Net Zero and Graham Stuart MP| date=1 September 2023 | url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-reviewing-membership-of-energy-treaty}}</ref><ref>"UK could quit 'climate-wrecking' treaty, minister announces" Damian Carrington, 1 Sep 2023, The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/sep/01/uk-could-quit-energy-charter-treaty-minister-announces</ref><ref>{{cite web | last=Rickard | first=Cleodie | title=Fossil fuel companies have a secret weapon. Here’s how Britain can help take it away from them | website=the Guardian | date=13 September 2023 | url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/sep/13/fossil-fuel-companies-britain-international-charter-treaty}}</ref>

=== Announced withdrawals ===
=== Announced withdrawals ===


As of October 2022, Spain, the Netherlands and Poland intend to withdraw from the ECT and Germany, France and Belgium are "examining their options".<<ref name=":2"/> On 21 October 2022, France announced it will leave the treaty, citing a desire to accelerate nuclear and renewable energy use before fossil fuels.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-10-21 |title=France to leave Energy Charter Treaty, says Macron |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/france-to-leave-energy-charter-treaty-says-macron/ |access-date=2022-10-26 |website=POLITICO}}</ref><ref name="neslen-on-france-2022">
As of October 2022, Spain, the Netherlands and Poland intended to withdraw from the ECT, and Germany, France and Belgium were "examining their options".<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |date=2022-10-20 |title=EU tries to stop energy treaty exit stampede |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-tries-to-stop-energy-treaty-exit-stampede/ |access-date=2023-07-10 |website=POLITICO |language=en}}</ref> On 21 October 2022, France announced that it would leave the treaty, citing a desire to accelerate nuclear and renewable energy use before fossil fuels.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-10-21 |title=France to leave Energy Charter Treaty, says Macron |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/france-to-leave-energy-charter-treaty-says-macron/ |access-date=2022-10-26 |website=POLITICO}}</ref><ref name="neslen-on-france-2022">
{{cite news
{{cite news
| last1 = Neslen | first1 = Arthur
| last1 = Neslen | first1 = Arthur
Line 481: Line 479:
| access-date = 2022-11-14
| access-date = 2022-11-14
}} {{open access}}
}} {{open access}}
</ref> Slovenia had earlier stated its intention to withdraw.<ref name="neslen-joint-investigation-2022"/> Italy withdrew in 2016.<ref name="ect-website-italy">
</ref> Slovenia had earlier stated its intention to withdraw.<ref name="neslen-joint-investigation-2022"/> Denmark announced in April 2023 that it intends to withdraw.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Klima-, Energi- og Forsyningsministeriet |title=Danmark udtræder af energichartertraktaten |url=https://kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2023/apr/danmark-udtraeder-af-energichartertraktaten |access-date=5 May 2023 |date=13 April 2023}}</ref>

In July 2023 the European Commission formally proposed legislation for both the union and its member states to make a "coordinated and orderly" simultaneous withdrawal from the ECT.<ref>{{cite news| last=Liboreiro | first=Jorge | title=Brussels tables EU-wide exit from controversial Energy Charter Treaty | publisher=euronews | date=7 July 2023 | url=https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2023/07/07/brussels-tables-eu-wide-exit-from-the-energy-charter-treaty-considered-at-odds-with-the-gr}}</ref><ref name=":3" />

The UK government announced in September 2023 that it would consider leaving the "outdated" treaty if modernisation was not agreed by that November.<ref>{{cite web | title=UK reviewing membership of energy treaty |publisher=UK Government Department for Energy Security and Net Zero and Graham Stuart MP| date=1 September 2023 | url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-reviewing-membership-of-energy-treaty}}</ref><ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/sep/01/uk-could-quit-energy-charter-treaty-minister-announces UK could quit 'climate-wrecking' treaty, minister announces], Damian Carrington, 1 September 2023, The Guardian</ref><ref>{{cite web | last=Rickard | first=Cleodie | title=Fossil fuel companies have a secret weapon. Here's how Britain can help take it away from them | website=the Guardian | date=13 September 2023 | url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/sep/13/fossil-fuel-companies-britain-international-charter-treaty}}</ref> In February 2024, the United Kingdom announced its plans to withdraw from the treaty due to a failure in negotiations to modernise the treaty.<ref>{{cite news|title=UK departs Energy Charter Treaty|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-departs-energy-charter-treaty|website=[[gov.uk|GOV.UK]]|date=22 February 2024|access-date=22 February 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240222105500/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-departs-energy-charter-treaty|archive-date=22 February 2024|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=UK to pull out of energy charter treaty that 'penalises' green climate action|url=https://news.sky.com/story/uk-to-pull-out-of-energy-charter-treaty-that-penalises-green-climate-action-13078088|website=[[Sky News]]|date=22 February 2024|access-date=22 February 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240222160852/https://news.sky.com/story/uk-to-pull-out-of-energy-charter-treaty-that-penalises-green-climate-action-13078088|archive-date=22 February 2024|url-status=live}}</ref> In March 2024, the European Union countries jointly agreed to leave the ECT. However, before this will take effect the European Parliament has to agree.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Abnett |first=Kate |date=2024-03-07 |title=EU countries to exit energy treaty over climate concerns, officials say |website=[[Reuters]] |url=https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/eu-countries-exit-energy-treaty-over-climate-concerns-officials-say-2024-03-07/ |access-date=2023-03-08}}</ref>

=== Withdrawals ===

Italy withdrew in 2016;<ref name="ect-website-italy">
{{cite web
{{cite web
| title = Italy — Energy Charter
| title = Italy — Energy Charter
| work = www.energycharter.org
| work = www.energycharter.org
| url = https://www.energycharter.org/who-we-are/members-observers/countries/italy/
| url = https://www.energycharter.org/who-we-are/members-observers/countries/italy/
| access-date = 2020-12-19
| date = 31 July 2015
}}
}}
</ref> France,<ref name=":4" /> Germany<ref name=":5" /> and Poland<ref name=":6" /> in 2023.
</ref> Denmark announced in April 2023 that it intends to withdraw.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Klima-, Energi- og Forsyningsministeriet |title=Danmark udtræder af energichartertraktaten |url=https://kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2023/apr/danmark-udtraeder-af-energichartertraktaten |access-date=5 May 2023 |date=13 April 2023}}</ref>

In July 2023 the European Commission formally proposed legislation for both the union and its member states to make a "coordinated and orderly" simultaneous withdrawal from the ECT.<ref>{{cite news| last=Liboreiro | first=Jorge | title=Brussels tables EU-wide exit from controversial Energy Charter Treaty | publisher=euronews | date=7 July 2023 | url=https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2023/07/07/brussels-tables-eu-wide-exit-from-the-energy-charter-treaty-considered-at-odds-with-the-gr}}</ref><ref name=":3" />


==See also==
==See also==

Latest revision as of 00:29, 1 October 2024

Energy Charter Conference
AbbreviationECT
Formation1991 (1991)
TypeIntergovernmental organisation
HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium
Official language
English, Russian, Spanish, French, Italian, German
Secretary General
Luxembourg Guy Lentz[1]
Deputy Secretary General
Atsuko Hirose[1]
Current chairmanship
Mongolia Mongolia[2]
Main organ
Energy Charter Conference
Staffapprox. 30
Websitehttps://www.energycharter.org

The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) is an international agreement which establishes a multilateral framework for cross-border cooperation in the energy industry, principally the fossil fuel industry. The treaty covers all aspects of commercial energy activities including trade, transit, investments and energy efficiency. The treaty contains dispute resolution procedures both for States Parties to the Treaty (vis-à-vis other States) and as between States and the investors of other States, who have made investments in the territory of the former.[3] Full versions of the treaty, both consolidated and official, are readily accessible.[4]

Initially, the Energy Charter process aimed to integrate the energy sectors of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe at the end of the Cold War into the broader European and world markets. Its role, however, extends beyond east–west cooperation and, through legally binding instruments, free trade in global energy markets and non-discrimination to stimulate foreign direct investments and global cross-border trade.

Awards and settlements of the international arbitrations put forward by breaking the law of the Energy Charter Treaty are sometimes in the hundreds of millions of dollars. In 2014, the Yukos cases were decided in favour of the claimants on the basis of the treaty with a record-breaking US$50 billion award, although appeals continue in courts in the Netherlands.

The Energy Charter Treaty has been criticized for being a significant obstacle to enacting national policies to combat climate change, and for actively disincentivizing national governments from compliance with recent international climate treaties such as the Paris Agreement due to the threat of significant financial loss.

As of 2023, numerous countries have either left or have announced plans to leave the ECT. The European Union and Euratom took the final and formal step of exiting the Energy Charter Treaty, which will take effect one year after the depository has received the notification.[5]

History

[edit]

European Energy Charter

[edit]

The beginnings of the Energy Charter date back to a political initiative launched in Europe in the early 1990s. The end of the Cold War offered an unprecedented opportunity to overcome previous economic divisions between the nations on both sides of the Iron Curtain. The brightest prospect for mutually co-dependent beneficial cooperation was the energy sector, given Europe's growing energy demand and vast resource availability in post-Soviet nations. Additionally, there was a recognised need to establish a commonly accepted foundation for energy cooperation among the states of Eurasia. By these considerations, the Energy Charter process was born.[6]

The original European Energy Charter declaration was signed in The Hague on 17 December 1991. It was a political declaration of principles for international energy cooperation in trade, transit and investment, together with the intention to negotiate a legally binding treaty, setting the beginning of the development of the Energy Charter Treaty. One of the final hurdles was to find language to ensure national sovereignty over natural resources while enshrining the principle of international cooperation to allow outside access to those resources. Negotiators also succeeded in assuring Austria and Switzerland that they would not bear an undue transit burden for energy resources.[7]

Energy Charter Treaty

[edit]

The treaty is a legally binding multilateral agreement covering investment promotion and protection, trade, transit, energy efficiency and dispute resolution. The treaty was signed in Lisbon in December 1994, together with a "protocol on energy efficiency and related environmental aspects" (PEEREA[8]). The treaty and the protocol came into effect in April 1998. An amendment to the trade-related provisions reflecting the change from the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade to World Trade Organization processes was also agreed at that time.[6]

International Energy Charter

[edit]

The International Energy Charter is a non-binding political declaration underpinning key principles for international energy cooperation. The declaration attempts to reflect the changes in the energy world that have emerged since the development of the original Energy Charter Treaty in the early 1990s. The International Energy Charter was signed on 20 May 2015, by 72 countries plus the EU, Euratom and ECOWAS at a Ministerial conference hosted by the government of The Netherlands.[9]

Energy Charter Conference

[edit]

Article 33 of the treaty establishes the Energy Charter Conference, which is the governing and decision-making body of the Organisation[10] and has United Nations General Assembly observer status in resolution 62/75 adopted by the General Assembly on 6 December 2007.[11] Members consist of Countries and Regional Economic Integration Organisations that have signed or acceded to the treaty and are represented in the Conference and its subsidiary bodies. The Conference meets on a regular basis to discuss issues affecting energy cooperation among Members and to review the implementation of the treaty and PEEREA provisions, and to consider new activities within the Energy Charter framework. The Energy Charter Conference has the following subsidiary bodies:

  • Strategy Group
  • Implementation Group
  • Budget Committee
  • Legal Advisory Committee

Additionally, a consultative board—the Industry Advisory Panel—presents the private sector's views on relevant issues related to energy investments, cross-border flows and energy efficiency to the Conference and its groups.

The Legal Advisory Task Force was set up by the Energy Charter Secretariat in 2001 to assist in the drafting of balanced and legally coherent Model Agreements for cross-border oil and gas pipelines.

Scope

[edit]

The treaty's provisions focus on four broad areas: Energy Trade, Investment, Energy Efficiency, Dispute Settlement, Energy Transit.

Trade

[edit]

The Energy Charter Treaty's purpose in Energy Trade is to create open and non-discriminatory energy markets throughout its member states. This framework follows the rules of the multilateral trading system as embodied in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which later became the World Trade Organization (WTO). The Energy Charter Treaty extends the GATT and later the WTO rules in the energy sector amongst its members. Additionally, the treaty covers the trade of all energy materials (e.g. crude oil, natural gas, wood fuel, etc.), all final energy products (e.g. petroleum, electricity, etc.) and energy-related equipment. The rules of trade only cover trade in goods, not trade in services, nor does it concern itself with intellectual property rights.

Investment

[edit]

The treaty is responsible for the protection of foreign direct investment. It is estimated that just in the European Union, the United Kingdom and Switzerland, the treaty protects fossil investments of at least €344.6 billion.[12] Its provisions protect investors and their investments from political risks involved in investing in a foreign country such as discrimination, expropriation, nationalisation, breach of contract, damages due to war, etc. The legally binding nature of the Energy Charter Treaty makes it the world's only multilateral framework for matters specifically related to energy.

Dispute settlement

[edit]

Whereas Article 27 sets out the provisions for dispute resolution between two contracting states, Article 26 of the Energy Charter Treaty provides express provisions for resolving disputes arising under the treaty between an investor of a Contracting State and another Contracting State. This process is generally known as Investor State Dispute Settlement or ISDS. The choices of arbitration rules are:

  • ICSID Rules
  • ICSID Additional Facilities Rules
  • UNCITRAL Ad hoc Rules
  • The Arbitration Rules of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce

The most significant claims against Russia, pertaining to the Yukos decision, arose under the provisions of Article 26.

The drafting of the treaty has raised some difficult questions in the area of Investor-State Disputes by academics.[13] In 2021 the treaty was struck down by the European Court of Justice for intra-EU disputes only.[14][15] Some areas of discussion are:

  • the standards of protection granted by the treaty;
  • the international responsibility of States for breaches of the treaty;
  • the various procedures available for the vindication of rights under the treaty;
  • the conditions to be satisfied before a claimant's complaint may be considered on the merits;
  • the impact of EU law on claims under the treaty;
  • the treaty's provisions concerning taxation;
  • possible effects of the ECT on climate;[16][17][18]
  • possible geopolitical, climate and financial impacts[19][20][21]

and also:

  • allegedly deleterious effects on states' budgets.[22]
  • Nathalie Bernasconi-Osterwalder, a lawyer at the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), criticises the ECT for not having "more precise definitions of investment protection standards, [for not] set[ting] out responsibilities for investors and [for not] integrat[ing] innovations with respect to dispute settlement to ensure transparency and independence," unlike more modern approaches. Moreover, she claims it is following expansionist ambitions.[23]
  • Tania Voon, a Professor in Law at the University of Melbourne, criticises the modernization of the ECT for not including a removal of the art. 47 survival clause, and for failing to introduce "a distinction between investments based on fossil fuels and those based on renewable energy" in order to achieve climate goals.[24]
  • Cross-party members of the European Parliament advised the commission to withdraw if modernization is not adequate.[25]

Energy efficiency

[edit]

The Energy Charter's involvement in matters of energy efficiency and its relation to a cleaner environment was introduced in the 1991 European Energy Charter. The subsequent Energy Charter Treaty, and in particular Article 19 of the treaty, requires that each Contracting Party "... shall strive to minimise in an economically efficient manner, harmful Environmental Impacts arising from energy use."[26]

Building on article 19 of the Energy Charter Treaty, the Protocol on Energy Efficiency and Related Environmental Aspects (PEEREA) defines in more detail the policy principles that can promote energy efficiency and provides guidance on the development of energy efficiency programmes. PEEREA was negotiated, opened for signature and entered into force at the same time (16 April 1998) as the Energy Charter Treaty.

In contrast to other activities in the Charter process, the emphasis in the work on energy efficiency is not legally binding, but rather on practical implementation of a political commitment to improve energy efficiency. This is promoted through policy discussions based on analysis and exchange of experience between the member countries, invited independent experts and other international organisations.

The implementation of PEEREA provides its member countries with a range of best practices and a forum in which to share experiences and policy advice on energy efficiency issues. Within this forum, particular attention is paid to national energy efficiency strategy, taxation, pricing policy in the energy sector, environmentally related subsidies and other mechanisms for financing energy efficiency objectives.[26]

Energy transit

[edit]

The Energy Charter Treaty provides a set of rules that covers the entire energy chain, including not only investments in production and generation but also the terms under which energy can be traded and transported across various national jurisdictions to international markets. As such, the agreement is intended to prevent disruption of fuel passing between countries.[27]

Transit Protocol

[edit]

The Energy Charter Transit Protocol is a draft protocol which negotiations are not finalised yet. The Protocol would amplify and strengthen the treaty provisions on energy transit issues to mitigate some specific operational risks that continue to affect energy transit flows. Negotiations on the text of the Transit Protocol began in early 2000 and a compromise text reflecting an extended discussion between the European Union and Russia was tabled for adoption at the meeting of the Energy Charter Conference on 10 December 2003. It became clear during the meeting that a unanimous decision could not be reached on the basis of the compromise text; a complicating factor was that energy issues, including transit, were a subject on the bilateral agenda for the European Union and Russia in the context of Russian negotiations for accession to the World Trade Organization. The Protocol negotiations were then temporarily suspended.

In December 2007, the Energy Charter Conference reaffirmed its support for the finalisation of negotiations and adoption of the Energy Charter Protocol on Transit to expand the existing provisions of the treaty.[28] This work proceeded until October 2011, when the European Union argued that, given current developments in the international energy situation and the lack of progress in negotiations and consultations, it appeared no longer opportune to continue talks. A review of the issue at the end of 2015 noted the continued demand for a multilateral legally-binding framework for energy transit, and recommended further exploring the basis for negotiations of such an agreement, which could address various aspects of oil, gas and electricity transportation and transit.[29]

The Energy Charter Treaty includes an obligation of member countries to facilitate energy transit across their territory, in line with the principle of freedom of transit, and to secure established transit flows. At the same time, the treaty provisions do not oblige any country to introduce mandatory third-party access.[30]

The principle of national sovereignty

[edit]

The principles of the Energy Charter are based on the idea that international flows of investments and technologies in the energy sector are mutually beneficial. But at the same time, national sovereignty over energy resources is a core principle of the treaty (ECT Article 18). An objective of the treaty is to promote transparency and efficiency in the operation of energy markets, but it is for governments to define the structure of their domestic energy sector. Each country is free to decide whether and how its national energy resources are developed, and the extent to which its energy sector is open to foreign investors. The treaty does not deal with the ownership issues of the energy companies–there is no obligation to privatise state-owned energy companies, or to break up vertically integrated energy companies.[30]

Membership

[edit]

Members are countries and Regional Economic Integration Organisations are a party to the treaty through ratification or accession. Membership also includes signatories which provisionally apply the treaty pending entry into force. Such provisional application applies automatically after signature, unless it is inconsistent with the domestic law of the country concerned. As October 2022, the treaty has 51 parties, while it is provisionally applied by two countries.[31] All Members have ratified the treaty except for Australia, Belarus, Norway, and the Russian Federation. Belarus has accepted provisional application of the treaty.[32]

Members of the Energy Charter Conference

[edit]

Source:[4]

Russia and Australia provisionally applied the treaty, but indicated the end of the provisional application period in 2009 and 2021 respectively. Italy was a party to the treaty from 1998 until 2016. In October 2022, a minister from the Netherlands announced his intention to facilitate withdrawal from the treaty.[33] On 21 October 2022, French President Emmanuel Macron also announced France's withdrawal from the treaty.[34][35] One month later, the German government also expressed its intent to leave the accord.[36] See also announced withdrawals below.

Note: * denotes a state that has signed the treaty and is applying it provisionally but has not ratified it, and denotes a state that has announced that it will withdraw from the treaty.

Observers

[edit]

Observers status is granted to countries and Regional Economic Integration Organisations that have signed either the European Energy Charter or the International Energy Charter. Observers have the right to attend all Charter meetings and to receive all related documentation, reports and analysis, and to participate in the working debates taking place within the Energy Charter. Also, International Organisations can be granted Observer status by decision of the Energy Charter Conference. The intention is that Observer status should provide the chance for a country to familiarise itself with the Charter and its functions, to facilitate its assessment of the benefits of accession to the Energy Charter Treaty.[37]

Countries

[edit]

Signatories of European Energy Charter (1991)

Signatories of the International Energy Charter (2015)

International organisations

[edit]

Former members

[edit]

Russian participation

[edit]

The Russian Federation signed the treaty and applied it provisionally but did not ratify it. It linked the ratification of the treaty to negotiations on an Energy Charter Transit Protocol. In October 2006, German chancellor Angela Merkel and French president Jacques Chirac proposed the creation of a balanced energy partnership between France and Germany, representing the European Union, and Russia. Under the agreement, Russia would have to sign the European Energy Charter, which, according to a New York Times summary of a report in Russian newspaper Kommersant, Russian President Vladimir Putin said impinges on Russia's national interests.[44]

In December 2006, Russia indicated that the ratification of the treaty was unlikely due to the provisions requiring third-party access to Russia's pipelines.[45] On 20 August 2009, it officially informed the depository of the treaty (Government of Portugal) that it did not intend to become a contracting party to the treaty and the related protocol terminating the provisional application of the treaty and the PEEREA starting from 18 October 2009.[46]

Notwithstanding the termination of provisional application of the treaty by Russia, the provisions regarding dispute settlements and investment protection are still in force for additional twenty years. On 30 November 2009, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, which had been considering this case since 2005 under the UNCITRAL Rules, ruled that former Yukos shareholders can move on to the merits phase of their arbitration claim against the Russian government.[46] GML, previously known as Menatep, the principal shareholder in Yukos, is suing Russia for more than $100 billion in an international arbitration case under the treaty. The hearings took place in October 2012.[47]

In July 2014, the international arbitration panel in The Hague unanimously ruled in favour of the shareholders, awarding $50 billion damages for the seizure of assets and dismantling of Yukos.[48] The Russian government has vowed not to comply with the ruling, setting off an international legal dispute which has resulted in France and Belgium seizing Russian assets for possible use as restitution for the claimants.[49] However, a French court ruled against the seizure by the French authorities,[50] and a Dutch court later overturned the $50 billion ruling, arguing Russia had not ratified the Energy Charter Treaty and so was not bound by it.[51]

Case law

[edit]

Renewable energy investment cases in Spain

[edit]

As of 2020, Spain was the state most affected by ECT awards, having lost €825 million to investors. In a series of 20 arbitral decision, Spain was found liable for having generated legitimate expectations of a stable framework of renewable energy investment incentives and having afterwards abruptly reversed these expectations.[52]

Secretariat

[edit]
The Secretariat is located in Brussels.

The Energy Charter Treaty established the creation of a permanent Secretariat that was originally set up to accommodate the dialogue amongst the contracting parties during the negotiation of the treaty. The Secretariat is mandated by the Energy Charter Conference Primarily to provide the Conference with all necessary assistance for the performance of its duties including promotion, organisation and legal support along with meeting space for subsidiary body meetings hosted at the Secretariat.

Since 1 January 2022, the Secretary General is Guy Lentz[53] and, since September 2021, the Assistant Secretary General is Atsuko Hirose.[54]

Organisation

[edit]

One of the primary mandates given by the Energy Charter Conference to the Secretariat is to organise and administer meetings of the Conference and its subsidiary bodies. In addition, the Secretariat organises conferences and energy forums related to the global ongoing energy dialogues.

Monitor ECT and PEEREA obligations

[edit]

Article 19 of the treaty, requires that each Contracting Party minimise, in an economically efficient manner, harmful environmental impacts arising from energy use.[55] The Secretariat monitors the enforcement of these obligations in the contracting parties of the treaty and creates various publicly available reports on each of the contracting parties such as energy efficiency[56] and the investment[57] climate.[58]

[edit]

The Energy Charter Treaty contains a comprehensive system for settling disputes on matters covered by the treaty. The two primary forms of binding dispute settlement are state-state arbitration on the interpretation or application of almost all aspects of the treaty (except for competition and environmental issues), and investor-state arbitration (Article 26) for investment disputes. There are special provisions, based on the WTO model, for the resolution of inter-state trade issues and the treaty also offers a conciliation procedure for transit disputes. The Secretariat maintains legal advice to these arbitrations as well as has responsibility for maintaining the Travaux préparatoires used to clarify the intentions of the treaty by Article 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.

The Secretariat maintains a publicly available list of cases that have been brought by investors to international arbitration. These cases have been litigated under the arbitration regulations of the ICSID, Arbitration Institute of the SCC, and UNCITRAL. The Arbitration Awards or Settlements are sometimes in the hundred of millions of dollars.[59][60] Disputes concerning competition (Article 6) and environmental issues (Article 19) the Secretariat provides for bilateral (in the case of competition) or multilateral (in the case of environmental protection) non-binding consultation mechanisms.

Criticism

[edit]

The Energy Charter Treaty has come under heavy criticism for being an obstacle to the transition to renewable energy. Transnational corporations who have invested in fossil fuel production and nuclear power can sue national governments for loss of profit on their investments as a consequence of the transition to renewable energy. Critics argue that the Energy Charter Treaty has a chilling effect on energy-related legislation.[61] Russia and Norway refused to ratify the treaty, and Italy left in 2016, over environmental concerns about ECT.[62] For example, the German energy company RWE has sued the Dutch government for €1.4 billion in compensation for the phasing out of coal power plants.[63][64] In October 2020, the European Parliament voted to end fossil fuel protection under the ECT.[61]

In late‑2022, the European Commission was seeking to clarify that the ECT does not apply within the European Union. The Commission says "the risk of legal conflict is such as to render an international agreement incompatible with EU law" and adds that EU [member] states should thus "confirm that the ECT does not apply, and has never applied to intra‑EU relations".[65]

A joint investigation by The Guardian, the Transnational Institute, and Berlin‑based Powershift, made public in mid‑November 2022, revealed opaque proceedings, inadequate controls on conflicts of interest for key personnel, including arbitrators, and potential bias in favor of fossil fuel interests.[66]

Calls and plans for withdrawal

[edit]

Several countries and organisations have proposed withdrawing from the ECT. However, the Treaty has a "sunset clause" that allows lawsuits to be filed for 20 years after the departure of a member; Italy left the ECT in 2015, but was successfully sued in 2022.[67]

In 2020, Julia Steinberger and Yamina Saheb (both co-authors of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report)[68] initiated an open letter that calls for the withdrawal from the ECT.[69] They justify the call with the claim that the ECT is an obstacle to the Paris Agreement and the European Green Deal. The letter has been signed, for example, by Sandrine Dixson-Declève, Connie Hedegaard, James K. Galbraith, Helga Kromp-Kolb, Rachel Kyte, Thomas Piketty, Olivier de Schutter and Jean-Pascal van Ypersele.[70] On 15 December 2020, the Spanish minister for ecological transition, Teresa Ribera, supported the idea of withdrawing from it if it was not possible to reach an agreement to make the Energy Charter Treaty compatible with the Paris Agreement.[71] The International Institute for Sustainable Development describes the possibility of a withdrawal with neutralization of the survival clause.[72]

Announced withdrawals

[edit]

As of October 2022, Spain, the Netherlands and Poland intended to withdraw from the ECT, and Germany, France and Belgium were "examining their options".[73] On 21 October 2022, France announced that it would leave the treaty, citing a desire to accelerate nuclear and renewable energy use before fossil fuels.[74][75] And on 14 November 2022, Germany announced its intention to withdraw in order to better tackle climate change.[36][76] Slovenia had earlier stated its intention to withdraw.[66] Denmark announced in April 2023 that it intends to withdraw.[77]

In July 2023 the European Commission formally proposed legislation for both the union and its member states to make a "coordinated and orderly" simultaneous withdrawal from the ECT.[78][67]

The UK government announced in September 2023 that it would consider leaving the "outdated" treaty if modernisation was not agreed by that November.[79][80][81] In February 2024, the United Kingdom announced its plans to withdraw from the treaty due to a failure in negotiations to modernise the treaty.[82][83] In March 2024, the European Union countries jointly agreed to leave the ECT. However, before this will take effect the European Parliament has to agree.[84]

Withdrawals

[edit]

Italy withdrew in 2016;[85] France,[40] Germany[41] and Poland[43] in 2023.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "Secretary-General Lentz and Deputy Secretary-General Hirose meet with the Industry Advisory Panel Chair".
  2. ^ "Mongolia assumes the Chairmanship of the Energy Charter Conference for 2022".
  3. ^ "EUR-Lex - l27028 - EN - EUR-Lex". eur-lex.europa.eu.
  4. ^ a b "Energy Charter Treaty". www.energycharter.org. Retrieved 13 December 2020.
  5. ^ "Energy Charter Treaty: EU notifies its withdrawal".
  6. ^ a b Konoplyanik, Andrei; Wälde, Thomas (2006). "Energy Charter Treaty and its Role in International Energy" (PDF). Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law. 24 (4). International Bar Association: 523–558. ISSN 0264-6811. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 August 2011. Retrieved 8 May 2010.
  7. ^ Charles Goldsmith (22 November 1991), To Help Soviets Tap Vast Resources: 36 Nations Agree on Energy Charter "International Herald Tribune"
  8. ^ "The Energy Charter Treaty and Related Documents" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 October 2013.
  9. ^ "72 Countries plus the EU, Euratom, and ECOWAS Adopt the International Energy Charter". Archived from the original on 1 October 2015. Retrieved 30 September 2015.
  10. ^ "The International Energy Charter Consolidated Energy Charter Treaty with Related Documents" (PDF). International Energy Charter. 15 January 2016. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
  11. ^ "United Nations Official Document". www.un.org.
  12. ^ "ECT data analysis: Results and Methods". 23 February 2021.
  13. ^ Thomas Roe, Matthew Happold and James Dingemans QC, Settlement of Investor-State Disputes under the Energy Charter Treaty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 2011.
  14. ^ Taylor, Kira (3 September 2021). "Energy Charter Treaty cannot be used in intra-EU disputes, rules top court, EURACTIV.com". Retrieved 4 September 2021.
  15. ^ "Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), Reference for a preliminary ruling – Energy Charter Treaty – Article 26 – Inapplicability between Member States". 2 September 2021. Retrieved 2 September 2021.
  16. ^ Simon, Frédéric (4 September 2019). "Luxembourg leads EU push to climate-proof Energy Charter Treaty, Sep 4, 2019, EURACTIV.com". Retrieved 6 September 2019.
  17. ^ Keating, Dave. "A Little-Known EU Investor Dispute Treaty Could Kill The Paris Climate Agreement". Forbes. Retrieved 9 September 2019.
  18. ^ Simon, Frédéric (30 April 2020). "EU plans to reform Energy Charter Treaty falling short, activists say, April 30, 2020, EURACTIV.com". Retrieved 30 April 2020.
  19. ^ Saheb, Yamina (September 2019). "The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT): Assessing its geopolitical, climate and financial impacts" (PDF). OpenExp. Retrieved 21 September 2019.
  20. ^ Saheb, Yamina (February 2020). "Modernisation of the Energy Charter Treaty: A Global Tragedy at a High Cost for Taxpayers" (PDF). OpenExp. Retrieved 19 February 2020.
  21. ^ Brauch, Martin Dietrich. "Should the European Union Fix, Leave or Kill the Energy Charter Treaty?". Retrieved 29 May 2021.
  22. ^ Eberhardt, Pia; Olivet, Cecilia; Steinfort, Lavinia (2018). Katharine Ainger (ed.). "One Treaty to Rule them All. The ever-expanding Energy Charter Treaty and the power it gives corporations to halt the energy transition" (PDF). Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) and the Transnational Institute (TNI). Retrieved 6 September 2019.
  23. ^ Bernasconi-Osterwalder, Nathalie. "Expansion of the Energy Charter to Africa and Asia: Undoing Reform in International Investment Law?, 2017". International Institute for Sustainable Development. Retrieved 9 September 2019.
  24. ^ Voon, Tania (2 October 2019). "Modernizing the Energy Charter Treaty: What about termination? In: International Investment News, October Special Edition: "International Investment Governance" available in English, Français and Español". International Institute for Sustainable Development. Retrieved 6 November 2019.
  25. ^ Sánchez Nicolás, Elena (23 October 2020). "MEPs urge EU to be ready to dump disputed energy treaty". EU Observer. Retrieved 23 October 2020.
  26. ^ a b "The Energy Charter Treaty and Related Documents: A Legal Framework for International Energy Cooperation" (PDF). International Energy Charter. 2004. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 October 2013.
  27. ^ Andrew E. Kramer (1 January 2006), Russia Cuts Flow of Natural Gas to Ukraine The New York Times.
  28. ^ "Energy Charter: Transit Protocol". Archived from the original on 10 February 2012. Retrieved 11 September 2012.
  29. ^ "DECISION OF THE ENERGY CHARTER CONFERENCE" (PDF).
  30. ^ a b "THE ENERGY CHARTER TREATY: A READER'S GUIDE" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 February 2016.
  31. ^ "Members & Observers - Energy Charter". www.energycharter.org.
  32. ^ a b "63. JKX Oil & Gas, et al v. Ukraine - Energy Charter". www.energycharter.org. Archived from the original on 7 February 2021. Retrieved 19 December 2019.
  33. ^ "Minister Jetten: Nederland stapt uit omstreden energieverdrag" [Minister Jetten: the Netherlands to withdraw from controversial energy treaty] (in Dutch). 18 October 2022. Retrieved 18 October 2022.
  34. ^ "Climat : Emmanuel Macron annonce que la France va se retirer du Traité sur la charte de l'énergie, jugé incompatible avec les objectifs de l'accord de Paris". 21 October 2022.
  35. ^ "France to leave Energy Charter Treaty, says Macron". 21 October 2022.
  36. ^ a b "Germany to pull out of fossil fuel treaty". Deutsche Welle. 11 November 2022. Retrieved 11 November 2022.
  37. ^ "Memorandum: Energy Charter Treaty" (PDF). Petform. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 January 2016.
  38. ^ "Baltic Sea Region Energy Cooperation". basrec.net. Retrieved 13 December 2020.
  39. ^ Letter of Understanding on Cooperative Activities between the Secretariats
  40. ^ a b "France – Energy Charter". Retrieved 14 April 2024.
  41. ^ a b "Germany – Energy Charter". Retrieved 14 April 2024.
  42. ^ "Italy - Energy Charter". www.energycharter.org. Retrieved 19 December 2020.
  43. ^ a b "Poland – Energy Charter". Retrieved 14 April 2024.
  44. ^ "MERKEL RESPONDS TO PUTIN'S ENERGY PROPOSAL". Kommersant. 13 October 2006. Archived from the original on 9 April 2023 – via The New York Times.
  45. ^ Russia gets tough on energy sales to Europe: No foreign access to pipelines, official says, by Judy Dempsey, International Herald Tribune 12 December 2006
  46. ^ a b "Arbitration Panel Holds That the 1994 Energy Charter Treaty Protects Foreign Energy Sector Investments in Former Soviet Union". Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom. 5 February 2010. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 July 2011. Retrieved 8 May 2010.
  47. ^ James Marson (27 July 2012), Yukos Investors Win Over $2 Million in Damages from Russia The Wall Street Journal.
  48. ^ "Russia Stole Yukos and Owes $50 Billion, International Panel Rules". Foreign Policy. Retrieved 28 September 2015.
  49. ^ "What's Really Happening With the Yukos Case". Foreign Policy. Retrieved 28 September 2015.
  50. ^ "French court rules in favor of Russia's Roscosmos in Yukos assets seizure case". Bilaterals.org. Retrieved 12 April 2016.
  51. ^ "Dutch court overturns $50 billion ruling against Russia in Yukos case". Bilaterals.org. Retrieved 21 April 2016.
  52. ^ Noilhac, Amélie (14 June 2020). "Renewable energy investment cases against Spain and the quest for regulatory consistency". QIL QDI. Retrieved 25 October 2022.
  53. ^ "Guy Lentz (2022-present)". Energy Charter. Archived from the original on 24 July 2022. Retrieved 24 July 2022.
  54. ^ "Deputy Secretary General". Energy Charter. Archived from the original on 7 July 2022. Retrieved 24 July 2022.
  55. ^ The Energy Charter Treaty and Related Documents - A Legal Framework for International Energy Cooperation (PDF) (Report). Energy Charter Secretariat. September 2004. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 October 2013.
  56. ^ http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/BiH_EE_2012_ENG.pdf [permanent dead link]
  57. ^ http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Poland_ICMS_2011_ENG.pdf [permanent dead link]
  58. ^ "Energy Charter: Publications". Archived from the original on 22 July 2012. Retrieved 31 August 2012.
  59. ^ "DLA Piper, Global Law Firm | Publications | Tribunal in Yukos case holds Russia is bound by Energy Charter Treaty". Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 31 August 2012.
  60. ^ "In-Depth Energy Efficiency Review of Croatia (2005) - Energy Charter". www.energycharter.org.
  61. ^ a b Verbeek, Bart-Jaap (15 December 2020). "Busting the myths around the Energy Charter Treaty". SOMO. Retrieved 10 February 2021.
  62. ^ Ferguson, Juliet (3 August 2021). "How shadow courts threaten the climate". New Internationalist. Retrieved 3 August 2021.
  63. ^ Leijten, Jorg; van der Walle, Erik (5 February 2021). "Energiebedrijf RWE denkt meer kans te maken op een Nederlandse schadevergoeding in Washington". NRC Handelsblad.
  64. ^ Wehrmann, Benjamin (5 February 2021). "RWE sues Netherlands for two billion euros compensation over the state's 2030 coal exit". Clean Energy Wire. Berlin, Germany. Retrieved 5 October 2021.
  65. ^ Neslen, Arthur (8 October 2022). "European Commission aims to end secret system protecting fossil fuel holdings". The Guardian. London, United Kingdom. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 8 October 2022.
  66. ^ a b Neslen, Arthur (14 November 2022). "Revealed: secret courts that allow energy firms to sue for billions accused of 'bias' as governments exit". The Guardian. London, United Kingdom. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 14 November 2022.
  67. ^ a b "EU moves to quit energy investment treaty". POLITICO. 7 July 2023.
  68. ^ "Working Group III contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6-WG3)". Retrieved 13 December 2020.
  69. ^ "End Fossil Protection". www.endfossilprotection.org. Retrieved 13 December 2020.
  70. ^ "Von Kromp-Kolb bis Piketty: Wissenschaftler*innen fordern Ausstieg aus Energiecharta-Vertrag". www.attac.at (in German). 9 December 2020. Retrieved 13 December 2020.
  71. ^ "The obscure energy pact that threatens the EU's Green Deal". POLITICO. 18 December 2020. Retrieved 14 January 2021.
  72. ^ Bernasconi-Osterwalder, Nathalie (24 June 2021). "Energy Charter Treaty Reform: Why withdrawal is an option – Investment Treaty News". International Institute for Sustainable Development. Retrieved 7 August 2021.
  73. ^ "EU tries to stop energy treaty exit stampede". POLITICO. 20 October 2022. Retrieved 10 July 2023.
  74. ^ "France to leave Energy Charter Treaty, says Macron". POLITICO. 21 October 2022. Retrieved 26 October 2022.
  75. ^ Neslen, Arthur (21 October 2022). "France becomes latest country to leave controversial Energy Charter Treaty". The Guardian. London, United Kingdom. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 21 October 2022.
  76. ^ Meza, Edgar (14 November 2022). "Germany to leave Energy Charter Treaty in effort to better tackle climate change". Clean Energy Wire. Berlin, Germany. Retrieved 14 November 2022. Open access icon
  77. ^ Klima-, Energi- og Forsyningsministeriet (13 April 2023). "Danmark udtræder af energichartertraktaten". Retrieved 5 May 2023.
  78. ^ Liboreiro, Jorge (7 July 2023). "Brussels tables EU-wide exit from controversial Energy Charter Treaty". euronews.
  79. ^ "UK reviewing membership of energy treaty". UK Government Department for Energy Security and Net Zero and Graham Stuart MP. 1 September 2023.
  80. ^ UK could quit 'climate-wrecking' treaty, minister announces, Damian Carrington, 1 September 2023, The Guardian
  81. ^ Rickard, Cleodie (13 September 2023). "Fossil fuel companies have a secret weapon. Here's how Britain can help take it away from them". the Guardian.
  82. ^ "UK departs Energy Charter Treaty". GOV.UK. 22 February 2024. Archived from the original on 22 February 2024. Retrieved 22 February 2024.
  83. ^ "UK to pull out of energy charter treaty that 'penalises' green climate action". Sky News. 22 February 2024. Archived from the original on 22 February 2024. Retrieved 22 February 2024.
  84. ^ Abnett, Kate (7 March 2024). "EU countries to exit energy treaty over climate concerns, officials say". Reuters. Retrieved 8 March 2023.
  85. ^ "Italy — Energy Charter". www.energycharter.org. 31 July 2015.
[edit]