Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2004/Candidate statements/Endorsements/Ambi

Ambi

Support

• Support, industrious and clear-thinking user. 12.75.139.231 20:49, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• —No-One Jones ^(m) 21:00, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Ambi has my endorsement because I believe her to be one of the current AC's wisest and fairest critics -- I know from my conversations with her that she has thought at length and with depth about the problems the AC has faced, and while I do not always agree with her conclusions, I respect greatly her openmindedness, her fairness, and her willingness to innovate. Jwrosenzweig 23:58, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Strongly support. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (hopefully!)]] 00:16, Nov 18, 2004 (UTC)
• Support. Dysprosia 00:43, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Support. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 01:37, 2004 Nov 18 (UTC)
• Very much so. Rdsmith4— Dan | Talk 01:41, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Johnleemk | Talk 05:44, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Support, good user. func(talk) 19:50, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Support. Strongly. Very sensible. Wolfman 02:16, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Strongly support. I'm a new user, and she's one of the few Wikipedians I've found to be both impressive and capable of staying outside her own biases. Level-headedness is a must for this role, and Ambi's near cornered the market when it comes to Wikipedians. Insert various other echoes of ShaneKing's endorsement here. Shem 14:56, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Ambi has earned my endorsement. – Quadell ^{(talk) (help)}[[]] 03:58, Nov 22, 2004 (UTC)
• Ambi has said that she has come to respect me despite significant ideological differences. I will more than return the compliment since I believe that Wikipedia must embrace not only divergent views, but also the people who see through people's opinions to the people themselves. Gladly support. -- Cecropia | explains it all ® 06:39, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Support, very clear vision of what's wrong with the ArbCom and how to fix it. VeryVerily 10:05, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Support, has followed arbitration proceedings regularly and has provided useful feedback. Fred Bauder 20:03, Nov 22, 2004 (UTC)
• Support. Mackensen (talk) 09:58, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• 100%, In my conversations with Ambi, she has demonstrated that she is a very understanding and coolheaded person. Ambi makes Wiki a better place.Tony the Marine
• Good luck, ambi. Support. - Vague | Rant 10:01, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)
• Support The bellman 11:22, 2004 Nov 27 (UTC)
• Strongly support. Balanced. Creative. Good common sense. --MPerel 06:36, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
• Support --jni 13:49, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Support. Cribcage 17:46, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Support. Sjc 07:55, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Support Slim 12:36, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
• Support AlexR 01:32, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• I'm happy to support, even if we've had an occasional disagreement. Everyking 10:39, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Strongly support (I hope I don't have a duplicate in here). User:Ta bu shi da yu (he forgot to sign)
• Strongly support GeneralPatton 03:11, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Support. —Lowellian (talk)[[]] 10:26, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)
• Strongly Support. Exploding Boy 21:56, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)
• Support →Iñgólemo← (talk) 07:26, 2004 Dec 5 (UTC)
• Support. ←Humus sapiens←Talk 10:25, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Support. --Robert Merkel 11:05, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Support. I'd vote for you, but I haven't been a Wikipedian for long enough... Alphax (talk) 14:46, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
• Support. Ld 05:28, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Support. [[User:GRider|GRider\^talk]] 18:51, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Oppose

• Oppose. Ambi intruded into a request for mediation to insert personal comments with no substance whatsoever. (See Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Archive 11.) We could expect the same tendentiousness if she were put into a position of power. Shorne 07:21, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Ambi is female. RickK 06:43, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)
    • I changed he to she on a previous version of this. Unfortunately, that correction was lost when Michael Snow deleted this page. Shorne 19:46, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Oppose. Hurt my feelings. - Xed 13:51, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Oppose. Extrapolates irrationally. example. Deletes negative feedback immediately. example --Rebroad 17:27, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • A glance at my talk page and archives reveals praise and disagreements alike. That was a one-off case several months ago, due to special circumstances, and I've had no reason to repeat it since. Ambi 04:45, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Oppose. Would support in future if Ambi resists the bait and avoids taking sides. HistoryBuffEr 01:15, 2004 Dec 1 (UTC)