Jump to content

Cabinet of Singapore: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bcmh (talk | contribs)
m added spacing
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(44 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Executive branch of the Singapore government}}
{{Short description|Executive branch of the Singapore government}}
{{For|the current Cabinet|Fifth Lee Hsien Loong Cabinet}}
{{For|the current Cabinet|First Lawrence Wong Cabinet}}
{{Good article}}
{{Use Oxford spelling|date=July 2013}}
{{Infobox government agency
{{Infobox government agency
| name = Cabinet of Singapore
| name = Cabinet of Singapore
| native_name = Current: [[Fifth Lee Hsien Loong Cabinet]]
| native_name = Current: [[First Lawrence Wong Cabinet]]
| seal = Coat of arms of Singapore.svg
| seal =
| seal_width = 200px
| seal_width = 200px
| seal_caption = A representation of the [[coat of arms of Singapore]] based on its [[blazon]]
| seal_caption = A representation of the [[coat of arms of Singapore]] based on its [[blazon]]
| logo =
| logo =
| image =
| image =
| type = [[Cabinet (government)|Cabinet]]
| type = [[Cabinet (government)|Cabinet]]
| formed = {{Start date and age|df=yes|1959|6|5}}
| formed = {{Start date and age|df=yes|1959|6|5}}
| agency_type = Decision making
| agency_type = Decision making
| agency_id = T08GA0009J
| jurisdiction = [[Government of Singapore]]
| headquarters = [[Singapore]]
| jurisdiction = [[Government of Singapore]]
| headquarters = [[Singapore]]
| employees =
| budget =
| employees =
| budget =
| chief1_name = [[Lee Hsien Loong]]
| chief1_name = [[Lawrence Wong]]
| chief1_position = <br><small>[[Prime Minister of Singapore|Prime Minister]]</small>
| chief1_position = <br />[[Prime Minister of Singapore|Prime Minister]] <br /> [[Ministry of Finance (Singapore)|Minister for Finance]]
| chief2_name = [[Heng Swee Keat]]
| chief2_name = [[Gan Kim Yong]]
| chief2_position = <br><small>[[Deputy Prime Minister of Singapore|Deputy Prime Minister]]<br>[[Coordinating Minister for Economic Policies]]</small>
| chief2_position = <br />[[Deputy Prime Minister of Singapore|Deputy Prime Minister]]<br />[[Ministry of Trade and Industry (Singapore)|Minister for Trade and Industry]]
| chief3_name = [[Lawrence Wong]]
| chief3_name = [[Heng Swee Keat]]
| chief3_position = <br><small>[[Deputy Prime Minister of Singapore|Deputy Prime Minister]] <br> [[Ministry of Finance (Singapore)|Minister for Finance]]</small>
| chief3_position = <br />[[Deputy Prime Minister of Singapore|Deputy Prime Minister]]
| parent_department =
| parent_department =
| keydocument1 =
| keydocument1 =
| website = {{url|https://www.pmo.gov.sg/The-Cabinet|www.pmo.gov.sg}}
| website = {{url|https://www.pmo.gov.sg/The-Cabinet|www.pmo.gov.sg}}
}}
}}


{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2019}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2019}}
{{Politics of Singapore}}
{{Politics of Singapore}}
The '''Cabinet of Singapore''' forms the [[executive (government)|executive branch]] of the [[Government of Singapore]] together with the [[President of Singapore|President]]. It is led by the [[Prime Minister of Singapore|Prime Minister]] who is the [[head of government]]. The prime minister is a [[Members of the Singapore Parliament|Member of Parliament]] (MP) appointed by the president who in the president's judgment is likely to command the confidence of the majority of the [[Members of the Singapore Parliament|Members of Parliament]] (MPs). The other Ministers in the [[cabinet (politics)|Cabinet]] are Members of Parliament appointed by the president acting in accordance with the advice of the prime minister. Ministers are prohibited from holding any [[office of profit]] and from actively engaging in any commercial enterprise.
The '''Cabinet of Singapore''' forms the [[executive (government)|executive branch]] of the [[Government of Singapore]] together with the [[President of Singapore|president]]. It is led by the [[Prime Minister of Singapore|prime minister]] who is the [[head of government]]. The prime minister is a [[Members of the Singapore Parliament|Member of Parliament]] (MP) appointed by the president who in the president's judgment is likely to command the confidence of the majority of the [[Members of the Singapore Parliament|Members of Parliament]] (MPs). The other ministers in the [[cabinet (politics)|Cabinet]] are Members of Parliament appointed by the president acting in accordance with the advice of the prime minister. Ministers are prohibited from holding any [[office of profit]] and from actively engaging in any commercial enterprise.


The Cabinet has the general direction and control of the Government and is [[Cabinet collective responsibility|collectively responsible]] to Parliament. It also has significant influence over lawmaking. Ministers may be designated by the prime minister to be in charge of particular [[organisation of the Government of Singapore|ministries]], or as Ministers in the [[Prime Minister's Office (Singapore)|Prime Minister's Office]]. Singapore's ministers are the highest paid in the world. Prior to a salary review in 2011, the prime minister's annual salary was [[Singapore dollar|S$]]3.07 million, while the pay of ministerial-level officers ranged between S$1.58 million and S$2.37 million.<ref name="PSD Salary 2012">{{cite web|title=White Paper - Salaries for a Capable and Committed Government|url=http://www.psd.gov.sg/docs/default-source/white-paper/white-20paper-20--20salaries-20for-20a-20capable-20and-20committed-20govt-1.pdf|website=Public Service Division|access-date=1 January 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150507095558/http://www.psd.gov.sg/white-paper/white-paper|archive-date=7 May 2015|date=10 January 2012}}</ref> On 21 May 2011, a committee was appointed by the prime minister to review the salaries of the prime minister as well as the president, political appointment holders, and Members of Parliament.<ref>{{cite press release |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Committee to review salaries of the President, Prime Minister and Political Appointment Holders |url=http://www.pmo.gov.sg/mediacentre/committee-review-salaries-president-prime-minister-and-political-appointment-holders |publisher=Prime Minister's Office |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305011334/http://www.pmo.gov.sg/mediacentre/committee-review-salaries-president-prime-minister-and-political-appointment-holders |archive-date=5 March 2016 |date=22 May 2011 |access-date=15 April 2020}}</ref> Following the recommended wage reductions by the committee which were then debated and subsequently accepted in Parliament, the prime minister's salary was reduced by 36% (includes the removal of his pension) to S$2.2 million.<ref name="PSD Salary 2012"/> Nonetheless, the prime minister remains the highest-paid political leader in the world.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Mathew|first1=Jerin|title=Singapore PM Lee Hsien Loong remains highest paid country leader with $1.7m annual salary|url=http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/singapore-pm-lee-hsien-loong-remains-highest-paid-country-leader-1-7m-annual-salary-1493952|access-date=1 January 2016|work=International Business Times|date=28 March 2015}}</ref>
The Cabinet has the general direction and control of the Government and is [[Cabinet collective responsibility|collectively responsible]] to Parliament. It also has significant influence over lawmaking. Ministers may be designated by the prime minister to be in charge of particular [[organisation of the Government of Singapore|ministries]], or as ministers in the [[Prime Minister's Office (Singapore)|Prime Minister's Office]]. Singapore's ministers are the highest paid in the world. Prior to a salary review in 2011, the prime minister's annual salary was [[Singapore dollar|S$]]3.07 million, while the pay of ministerial-level officers ranged between S$1.58 million and S$2.37 million.<ref name="PSD Salary 2012">{{cite web|title=White Paper - Salaries for a Capable and Committed Government|url=http://www.psd.gov.sg/docs/default-source/white-paper/white-20paper-20--20salaries-20for-20a-20capable-20and-20committed-20govt-1.pdf|website=Public Service Division|access-date=1 January 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150507095558/http://www.psd.gov.sg/white-paper/white-paper|archive-date=7 May 2015|date=10 January 2012}}</ref> On 21 May 2011, a committee was appointed by the prime minister to review the salaries of the prime minister as well as the president, political appointment holders, and Members of Parliament.<ref>{{cite press release |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Committee to review salaries of the President, Prime Minister and Political Appointment Holders |url=http://www.pmo.gov.sg/mediacentre/committee-review-salaries-president-prime-minister-and-political-appointment-holders |publisher=Prime Minister's Office |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305011334/http://www.pmo.gov.sg/mediacentre/committee-review-salaries-president-prime-minister-and-political-appointment-holders |archive-date=5 March 2016 |date=22 May 2011 |access-date=15 April 2020}}</ref> Following the recommended wage reductions by the committee which were then debated and subsequently accepted in Parliament, the prime minister's salary was reduced by 36% (includes the removal of his pension) to S$2.2 million.<ref name="PSD Salary 2012"/> Nonetheless, the prime minister remains the highest-paid political leader in the world.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Mathew|first1=Jerin|title=Singapore PM Lee Hsien Loong remains highest paid country leader with $1.7m annual salary|url=http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/singapore-pm-lee-hsien-loong-remains-highest-paid-country-leader-1-7m-annual-salary-1493952|access-date=1 January 2016|work=International Business Times|date=28 March 2015}}</ref>


The earliest predecessor of the Cabinet was the Executive Council of the [[Straits Settlements]], introduced in 1877 to advise the [[list of British Governors of the Straits Settlements|Governor of the Straits Settlements]]. It wielded no executive power. In 1955, a Council of Ministers was created, made up of three ''ex officio'' Official Members and six Elected Members of the [[Legislative Assembly of Singapore]], appointed by the governor on the recommendation of the [[Leader of the House (Singapore)|leader of the house]]. Following the general elections that year, [[David Marshall (Singaporean politician)|David Saul Marshall]] became the first [[Chief Minister of Singapore]]. Constitutional talks between Legislative Assembly representatives and the [[Colonial Office]] were held from 1956 to 1958, and Singapore gained full internal self-government in 1959. The governor was replaced by the [[Yang di-Pertuan Negara]], who had power to appoint to the post of prime minister the person most likely to command the authority of the Assembly, and other ministers of the Cabinet on the prime minister's advice. In the [[1959 Singaporean general election|1959 general elections]], the [[People's Action Party]] (PAP) swept to power with 43 out of the 51 seats in the Assembly, and [[Lee Kuan Yew]] became the first Prime Minister of Singapore. The executive branch of the Government of Singapore remained unchanged following Singapore's [[Singapore in Malaysia|merger with Malaysia]] in 1963, and subsequent [[history of the Republic of Singapore#Independence from Malaysia|independence]] in 1965.
The earliest predecessor of the Cabinet was the Executive Council of the [[Straits Settlements]], introduced in 1877 to advise the [[list of British Governors of the Straits Settlements|governor of the Straits Settlements]]. It wielded no executive power. In 1955, a Council of Ministers was created, made up of three ''ex officio'' Official Members and six Elected Members of the [[Legislative Assembly of Singapore]], appointed by the governor on the recommendation of the [[Leader of the House (Singapore)|leader of the house]]. Following the general elections that year, [[David Marshall (Singaporean politician)|David Saul Marshall]] became the first [[Chief Minister of Singapore]]. Constitutional talks between Legislative Assembly representatives and the [[Colonial Office]] were held from 1956 to 1958, and Singapore gained full internal self-government in 1959. The governor was replaced by the [[Yang di-Pertuan Negara]], who had power to appoint to the post of prime minister the person most likely to command the authority of the Assembly, and other ministers of the Cabinet on the prime minister's advice. In the [[1959 Singaporean general election|1959 general elections]], the [[People's Action Party]] (PAP) swept to power with 43 out of the 51 seats in the Assembly, and [[Lee Kuan Yew]] became the first prime minister of Singapore. The executive branch of the Government of Singapore remained unchanged following Singapore's [[Singapore in Malaysia|merger with Malaysia]] in 1963, and subsequent [[history of the Republic of Singapore#Independence from Malaysia|independence]] in 1965.


Following the [[2020 Singaporean general election|2020 general election]], a Cabinet reshuffle took place on 27 July 2020 for the "4G" leaders to experience different ministries with 37 political office holders, the same number as the previous Cabinet. [[Heng Swee Keat]] was assigned an additional role as [[Coordinating Minister for Economic Policies (Singapore)|Coordinating Minister for Economic Policies]] while maintaining his other appointments as Minister for Finance and Deputy Prime Minister.
Following the [[2020 Singaporean general election|2020 general election]], a Cabinet reshuffle took place on 27 July 2020 for the "4G" leaders to experience different ministries with 37 political office holders, the same number as the previous Cabinet. [[Heng Swee Keat]] was assigned an additional role as [[Coordinating Minister for Economic Policies (Singapore)|Coordinating Minister for Economic Policies]] while maintaining his other appointments as Minister for Finance and deputy prime minister.


[[Gan Kim Yong]], [[Ong Ye Kung]], [[Josephine Teo]], [[Lawrence Wong]], [[S. Iswaran]] and [[Chan Chun Sing]] were reshuffled into new portfolios as Minister. [[Tan See Leng]] was appointed as Minister for Manpower after [[Heng Swee Keat]] ruled himself out as the PAP's 4G leader and the next prime minister. While [[Lee Hsien Loong]], [[Teo Chee Hean]], [[Tharman Shanmugaratnam]], [[Ng Eng Hen]], [[Vivian Balakrishnan]], [[Grace Fu]] and [[K. Shanmugam]] retained their portfolios with no new appointments. [[Indranee Rajah]] was also reshuffled into a new ministry as second minister while maintaining her role as Minister in the Prime Minister's Office as of 15 May 2021.
[[Gan Kim Yong]], [[Ong Ye Kung]], [[Josephine Teo]], [[Lawrence Wong]], [[S. Iswaran]] and [[Chan Chun Sing]] were reshuffled into new portfolios as minister. [[Tan See Leng]] was appointed as Minister for Manpower after [[Heng Swee Keat]] ruled himself out as the PAP's 4G leader and the next prime minister. While [[Lee Hsien Loong]], [[Teo Chee Hean]], [[Tharman Shanmugaratnam]], [[Ng Eng Hen]], [[Vivian Balakrishnan]], [[Grace Fu]] and [[K. Shanmugam]] retained their portfolios with no new appointments. [[Indranee Rajah]] was also reshuffled into a new ministry as second minister while maintaining her role as minister in the Prime Minister's Office as of 15 May 2021.


[[Maliki Osman]] and [[Edwin Tong]] were both promoted to a minister position. [[Tan See Leng]] was newly appointed into the cabinet as both a minister and second minister.<ref>{{Cite web|title=PM Lee announces new Cabinet; 6 office holders promoted, 3 retirements|url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/pm-lee-singapore-new-cabinet-parliament-ge2020-12962844|access-date=2020-07-26|website=CNA|language=en}}</ref>
[[Maliki Osman]] and [[Edwin Tong]] were both promoted to a minister position. [[Tan See Leng]] was newly appointed into the cabinet as both a minister and second minister.<ref>{{Cite web|title=PM Lee announces new Cabinet; 6 office holders promoted, 3 retirements|url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/pm-lee-singapore-new-cabinet-parliament-ge2020-12962844|access-date=2020-07-26|website=CNA|language=en|archive-date=25 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200725183434/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/pm-lee-singapore-new-cabinet-parliament-ge2020-12962844|url-status=dead}}</ref>


On 6 June 2022, [[Prime Minister of Singapore|Prime Minister]] [[Lee Hsien Loong]] announced his new Cabinet line-up and other political appointments on 6 June 2022. These changes will take effect from 13 June 2022. [[Lawrence Wong]] will be promoted to [[Deputy Prime Minister of Singapore|Deputy Prime Minister]]. He will be the Acting Prime Minister in the absence of the Prime Minister and will continue as Minister for Finance.
On 6 June 2022, then [[Prime Minister of Singapore|prime minister]] [[Lee Hsien Loong]] announced his new Cabinet line-up and other political appointments on 6 June 2022. These changes took effect from 13 June 2022. [[Lawrence Wong]] was promoted to [[Deputy Prime Minister of Singapore|deputy prime minister]] and was appointed the acting prime minister in the absence of the prime minister and will continue as Minister for Finance. Lee Hsien Loong resigned from the office of the prime minister in 15 May 2024, and Lawrence Wong succeeded him as the 4th prime minister.


[[Tan Kiat How]], [[Chee Hong Tat]] were reshuffled to a new ministry as senior minister. [[Eric Chua]], [[Baey Yam Keng]] and [[Rahayu Mahzam]] will be promoted and appointed to Senior Parliamentary Secretary. [[Koh Poh Koon]] will be appointed Senior Minister of State.
On 18 January 2024, [[S. Iswaran]] was charged in the State Courts of Singapore with 27 charges relating to bribery and corruption and [[S. Iswaran]] resigned. Lee Hsien Loong appointed [[Chee Hong Tat]] as the new [[Ministry of Transport (Singapore)|Minister of Transport]].

[[Sun Xueling]] and [[Desmond Tan (politician)|Desmond Tan]] will be appointed Minister of State and Minister of State in the Prime Minister’s Office respectively.


==History==
==History==
Up to the outbreak of [[World War II]], [[Singapore]] was part of the [[Crown colony]] known as the [[Straits Settlements]] together with [[Malacca]] and [[Penang]]. The earliest predecessor of the Cabinet was arguably the Executive Council of the Straits Settlements that was introduced in 1877 by [[letters patent]] issued by [[the Crown]],<ref>[[Letters patent]] dated 17 November 1877.</ref> though its function was very different from that of today's Cabinet. The council, which was composed of "such persons and constituted in such manner as may be directed" by royal instructions,<ref>1877 letters patent, Art. II.</ref> existed to advise the [[list of British Governors of the Straits Settlements|Governor of the Straits Settlements]] and wielded no executive power. The Governor was required to consult the Executive Council on all affairs of importance unless they were too urgent to be laid before it, or if reference to it would prejudice the public service. In such urgent cases, the Governor had to inform the Council of the measures he had taken.<ref>{{citation|author=[[Richard Olaf Winstedt]]|title=The Constitution of the Colony of the Straits Settlements and the Federated and Unfederated Malay States|location=London|publisher=[[Chatham House|Royal Institute of International Affairs]]|year=1931|page=4}}.</ref><ref>{{citation|author=Kevin Tan Yew Lee|chapter=A Short Legal and Constitutional History of Singapore|editor=Kevin Y L Tan |title=The Singapore Legal System|edition=2nd|location=Singapore|publisher=[[National University of Singapore|Singapore University Press]]|year=1999|page=26 at 37|isbn=978-9971-69-213-1}}.</ref>
Up to the outbreak of [[World War II]], [[Singapore]] was part of the [[Crown colony]] known as the [[Straits Settlements]] together with [[Malacca]] and [[Penang]]. The earliest predecessor of the Cabinet was arguably the Executive Council of the Straits Settlements that was introduced in 1877 by [[letters patent]] issued by [[the Crown]],<ref>[[Letters patent]] dated 17 November 1877.</ref> though its function was very different from that of today's Cabinet. The council, which was composed of "such persons and constituted in such manner as may be directed" by royal instructions,<ref>1877 letters patent, Art. II.</ref> existed to advise the [[list of British Governors of the Straits Settlements|Governor of the Straits Settlements]] and wielded no executive power (including the [[List of chief secretaries of Singapore|Colonial Secretary]]). The Governor was required to consult the Executive Council on all affairs of importance unless they were too urgent to be laid before it, or if reference to it would prejudice the public service. In such urgent cases, the Governor had to inform the Council of the measures he had taken.<ref>{{citation|author=[[Richard Olaf Winstedt]]|title=The Constitution of the Colony of the Straits Settlements and the Federated and Unfederated Malay States|location=London|publisher=[[Chatham House|Royal Institute of International Affairs]]|year=1931|page=4}}.</ref><ref>{{citation|author=Kevin Tan Yew Lee|chapter=A Short Legal and Constitutional History of Singapore|editor=Kevin Y. L. Tan |title=The Singapore Legal System|edition=2nd|location=Singapore|publisher=[[National University of Singapore|Singapore University Press]]|year=1999|page=26 at 37|isbn=978-9971-69-213-1}}.</ref>


[[File:Williamrobinson.jpg|thumb|Sir [[William Cleaver Francis Robinson]] (1834–1897), the [[list of British Governors of the Straits Settlements|Governor of the Straits Settlements]] when the Executive Council of the Straits Settlements was introduced in 1877]]
[[File:Williamrobinson.jpg|thumb|Sir [[William Cleaver Francis Robinson]] (1834–1897), the [[list of British Governors of the Straits Settlements|Governor of the Straits Settlements]] when the Executive Council of the Straits Settlements was introduced in 1877]]


Following the Second World War, the Straits Settlements were disbanded and Singapore became a Crown colony in its own right.<ref>By the Straits Settlements (Repeal) Act 1946 ([[List of Acts of Parliament of the United Kingdom Parliament, 1940-1959#9 & 10 Geo. VI|9 & 10 Geo. VI]], c. 37) and the Singapore Order-in-Council 1946, [[Statutory Rules and Orders|S. R. & O.]], 1946, No. 462 (UK), dated 27 March 1946.</ref> The reconstituted Executive Council consisted of six officials and four nominated "unofficials".<ref>Tan, "A Short Legal and Constitutional History of Singapore", p. 41.</ref> In February 1954, the Rendel Constitutional Commission under the chairmanship of Sir [[George William Rendel]], which had been appointed to comprehensively review the constitution of the Colony of Singapore, rendered its report. Among other things, it recommended that a Council of Ministers be created, composed of three ''ex officio'' Official Members and six Elected Members of the [[Legislative Assembly of Singapore]] appointed by the Governor on the recommendation of the Leader of the House, who would be the leader of the largest political party or [[coalition government|coalition of parties]] having majority support in the legislature. The recommendation was implemented in 1955.<ref>By the Singapore Colony Order-in-Council 1955, [[Statutory Instrument (UK)|S.I.]] 1955, No. 187 (UK).</ref> In the general election held that year, the [[Labour Front]] took a majority of the seats in the Assembly, and [[David Marshall (Singaporean politician)|David Saul Marshall]] became the first [[Chief Minister of Singapore]]. Major problems with the Rendel Constitution were that the Chief Minister and Ministers' powers were ill-defined, and that the Official Members retained control of the finance, administration, and internal security and law portfolios. This led to confrontation between Marshall, who saw himself as a Prime Minister governing the country, and the [[Governor of Singapore|Governor]], Sir [[John Fearns Nicoll]], who felt that important decisions and policies should remain with himself and the Official Members.<ref>{{citation|author=Yeo Kim Wah|title=Political Development in Singapore, 1945–55|location=[Singapore]|publisher=Singapore University Press|year=1973|page=62}}.</ref><ref>Tan, "A Short Legal and Constitutional History of Singapore", pp. 42–43.</ref>
Following the Second World War, the Straits Settlements were disbanded and Singapore became a Crown colony in its own right.<ref>By the [[Straits Settlements (Repeal) Act 1946]] ([[9 & 10 Geo. 4]]. c. 37) and the Singapore Order-in-Council 1946, [[Statutory Rules and Orders|S. R. & O.]], 1946, No. 462 (UK), dated 27 March 1946.</ref> The reconstituted Executive Council consisted of six officials and four nominated "unofficials".<ref>Tan, "A Short Legal and Constitutional History of Singapore", p. 41.</ref> In February 1954, the Rendel Constitutional Commission under the chairmanship of Sir [[George William Rendel]], which had been appointed to comprehensively review the constitution of the Colony of Singapore, rendered its report. Among other things, it recommended that a Council of Ministers be created, composed of three ''ex officio'' Official Members and six Elected Members of the [[Legislative Assembly of Singapore]] appointed by the Governor on the recommendation of the Leader of the House, who would be the leader of the largest political party or [[coalition government|coalition of parties]] having majority support in the legislature. The recommendation was implemented in 1955.<ref>By the Singapore Colony Order-in-Council 1955, [[Statutory Instrument (UK)|S.I.]] 1955, No. 187 (UK).</ref> In the general election held that year, the [[Labour Front]] took a majority of the seats in the Assembly, and [[David Marshall (Singaporean politician)|David Saul Marshall]] became the first [[Chief Minister of Singapore]]. Major problems with the Rendel Constitution were that the Chief Minister and ministers' powers were ill-defined, and that the Official Members retained control of the finance, administration, and internal security and law portfolios. This led to confrontation between Marshall, who saw himself as a prime minister governing the country, and the [[Governor of Singapore|Governor]], Sir [[John Fearns Nicoll]], who felt that important decisions and policies should remain with himself and the Official Members.<ref>{{citation|author=Yeo Kim Wah|title=Political Development in Singapore, 1945–55|location=[Singapore]|publisher=Singapore University Press|year=1973|page=62}}.</ref><ref>Tan, "A Short Legal and Constitutional History of Singapore", pp. 42–43.</ref>


[[File:LeeKuanYew-20051106.jpg|thumb|left|150px|[[Lee Kuan Yew]], who was elected the first [[Prime Minister of Singapore]] in 1959, in a 2005 photograph]]
[[File:LeeKuanYew-20051106.jpg|thumb|left|150px|[[Lee Kuan Yew]], who was elected the first [[Prime Minister of Singapore|prime minister of Singapore]] in 1959, in a 2005 photograph]]


In 1956, members of the Legislative Assembly held constitutional talks with the [[Colonial Office]] in London. The talks broke down as Marshall did not agree to the British Government's proposal for the [[casting vote]] on a proposed Defence Council to be held by the British High Commissioner to Singapore, who would only exercise it in an emergency. Marshall resigned as Chief Minister in June 1956, and was replaced by [[Lim Yew Hock]].<ref>{{citation|author=[[Mary Turnbull|C[onstance] M[ary] Turnbull]]|title=A History of Singapore, 1819–1975|location=Kuala Lumpur; New York, N.Y.|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|year=1977|page=263|isbn=978-0-19-580354-9}}.</ref> The following year, Lim led another delegation to the UK for further talks on self-government. This time, agreement was reached on the composition of an Internal Security Council.<ref>Turnbull, p. 264.</ref> Other constitutional arrangements were swiftly settled in 1958, and on 1 August the [[Parliament of the United Kingdom]] passed the State of Singapore Act 1958,<ref>State of Singapore Act 1958 ([[List of Acts of Parliament of the United Kingdom Parliament, 1940-1959#6 & 7 Eliz. II|6 & 7 Eliz. II]], c. 59, UK).</ref> granting the colony full internal self-government. Under Singapore's new constitution which came into force on 3 June 1959,<ref>Singapore (Constitution) Order-in-Council 1958, S.I. 1958, No. 156 (UK).</ref> the Governor was replaced by the [[Yang di-Pertuan Negara]] (Head of State), who had power to appoint as Prime Minister the person most likely to command the authority of the Legislative Assembly, and other Ministers of the Cabinet on the Prime Minister's advice.<ref>Singapore (Constitution) Order-in-Council 1958 (UK), Art. 21.</ref> The Constitution also created the post of the British High Commissioner,<ref>Singapore (Constitution) Order-in-Council 1958 (UK), Arts. 15–19.</ref> who was entitled to receive the agenda of each Cabinet meeting and to see all Cabinet papers. In the [[1959 Singaporean general election|1959 general elections]], the [[People's Action Party]] (PAP) swept to power with 43 out of the 51 seats in the Assembly, and [[Lee Kuan Yew]] became the first Prime Minister of Singapore. Nine other Ministers were appointed to the Cabinet.<ref>Tan, "A Short Legal and Constitutional History of Singapore", pp. 44–45.</ref>
In 1956, members of the Legislative Assembly held constitutional talks with the [[Colonial Office]] in London. The talks broke down as Marshall did not agree to the British Government's proposal for the [[casting vote]] on a proposed Defence Council to be held by the British High Commissioner to Singapore, who would only exercise it in an emergency. Marshall resigned as Chief Minister in June 1956, and was replaced by [[Lim Yew Hock]].<ref>{{citation|author-link=Mary Turnbull |first=Constance Mary |last=Turnbull |title=A History of Singapore, 1819–1975|location=Kuala Lumpur; New York, N.Y.|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|year=1977|page=263|isbn=978-0-19-580354-9}}.</ref> The following year, Lim led another delegation to the UK for further talks on self-government. This time, agreement was reached on the composition of an Internal Security Council.<ref>Turnbull, p. 264.</ref> Other constitutional arrangements were swiftly settled in 1958, and on 1 August the [[Parliament of the United Kingdom]] passed the [[State of Singapore Act 1958]] ([[6 & 7 Eliz. 2]]. c. 59 (UK)) granting the colony full internal self-government. Under Singapore's new constitution which came into force on 3 June 1959,<ref>Singapore (Constitution) Order-in-Council 1958, S.I. 1958, No. 156 (UK).</ref> the Governor was replaced by the [[Yang di-Pertuan Negara]] (Head of State), who had power to appoint as prime minister the person most likely to command the authority of the Legislative Assembly, and other ministers of the Cabinet on the prime minister's advice.<ref>Singapore (Constitution) Order-in-Council 1958 (UK), Art. 21.</ref> The Constitution also created the post of the British High Commissioner,<ref>Singapore (Constitution) Order-in-Council 1958 (UK), Arts. 15–19.</ref> who was entitled to receive the agenda of each Cabinet meeting and to see all Cabinet papers. In the [[1959 Singaporean general election|1959 general elections]], the [[People's Action Party]] (PAP) swept to power with 43 out of the 51 seats in the Assembly, and [[Lee Kuan Yew]] became the first prime minister of Singapore. Nine other ministers were appointed to the Cabinet.<ref>Tan, "A Short Legal and Constitutional History of Singapore", pp. 44–45.</ref>


The British High Commissioner's role became that of an [[ambassador]] following Singapore's independence from Britain and [[Singapore in Malaysia|merger with Malaysia]] in 1963. Apart from that the executive branch of the Singapore Government remained largely unchanged,<ref>Tan, "A Short Legal and Constitutional History of Singapore", p. 46.</ref> although now it governed a state within a larger [[federation]]. However, with effect from 9 August 1965, Singapore left the [[Malaysia|Federation of Malaysia]] and became a fully [[history of the Republic of Singapore#Independence from Malaysia|independent republic]]. On separation from Malaysia, the Singapore Government retained its executive authority, and the executive authority of the [[Parliament of Malaysia]] ceased to extend to Singapore and vested in the Singapore Government.<ref>Constitution and Malaysia (Singapore Amendment) Act 1965 (No. 53 of 1965) (Malaysia), ss. 4 and 5.</ref> The [[Yang di-Pertuan Agong]], the Supreme Head of State of Malaysia, also ceased to be the Supreme Head of Singapore and relinquished his sovereignty, jurisdiction, power and authority, executive or otherwise in respect of Singapore, which revested in the Yang di-Pertuan Negara of Singapore.<ref>Constitution and Malaysia (Singapore Amendment) Act 1965 (Malaysia), s. 6.</ref> The Republic of Singapore Independence Act 1965<ref>{{Singapore legislation|title=Republic of Singapore Independence Act|ed=1985}}, s. 4.</ref> then vested the executive authority of Singapore in the newly created post of President, and made it exercisable by him or by the Cabinet or by any Minister authorized by the Cabinet.
The British High Commissioner's role became that of an [[ambassador]] following Singapore's independence from Britain and [[Singapore in Malaysia|merger with Malaysia]] in 1963. Apart from that the executive branch of the Singapore Government remained largely unchanged,<ref>Tan, "A Short Legal and Constitutional History of Singapore", p. 46.</ref> although now it governed a state within a larger [[federation]]. However, with effect from 9 August 1965, Singapore left the [[Malaysia|Federation of Malaysia]] and became a fully [[history of the Republic of Singapore#Independence from Malaysia|independent republic]]. On separation from Malaysia, the Singapore Government retained its executive authority, and the executive authority of the [[Parliament of Malaysia]] ceased to extend to Singapore and vested in the Singapore Government.<ref>Constitution and Malaysia (Singapore Amendment) Act 1965 (No. 53 of 1965) (Malaysia), ss. 4 and 5.</ref> The [[Yang di-Pertuan Agong]], the Supreme Head of State of Malaysia, also ceased to be the Supreme Head of Singapore and relinquished his sovereignty, jurisdiction, power and authority, executive or otherwise in respect of Singapore, which revested in the Yang di-Pertuan Negara of Singapore.<ref>Constitution and Malaysia (Singapore Amendment) Act 1965 (Malaysia), s. 6.</ref> The Republic of Singapore Independence Act 1965<ref>{{Singapore legislation|title=Republic of Singapore Independence Act|ed=1985}}, s. 4.</ref> then vested the executive authority of Singapore in the newly created post of president, and made it exercisable by him or by the Cabinet or by any minister authorized by the Cabinet.


==Structure of government==
==Structure of government==
Singapore inherited a [[Westminster system]] of government from the [[British Empire|British]]. In such systems, there is an overlap between the [[executive (government)|executive]] and [[legislature|legislative branches]] of government. The [[head of state]], who is the [[President of Singapore]], is a member of both the executive [[Government of Singapore]] and the [[Parliament of Singapore]] but plays a minimal role in them. Executive power lies in the hands of the [[cabinet (government)|Cabinet]], which is made up of the [[Prime Minister of Singapore]] (the [[head of government]]) and other Ministers.<ref>{{Singapore legislation|title=Constitution|ed=1985|rep=1999}}, Art. 24(1).</ref> At the same time, the Prime Minister and Ministers are also [[Members of the Singapore Parliament|Members of Parliament]] (MPs).
Singapore inherited a [[Westminster system]] of government from the [[British Empire|British]]. In such systems, there is an overlap between the [[executive (government)|executive]] and [[legislature|legislative branches]] of government. The [[head of state]], who is the [[president of Singapore]], is a member of both the executive [[Government of Singapore]] and the [[Parliament of Singapore]] but plays a minimal role in them. Executive power lies in the hands of the [[cabinet (government)|Cabinet]], which is made up of the [[Prime Minister of Singapore|prime minister of Singapore]] (the [[head of government]]) and other ministers.<ref>{{Singapore legislation|title=Constitution|ed=1985|rep=1999}}, Art. 24(1).</ref> At the same time, the prime minister and ministers are also [[Members of the Singapore Parliament|Members of Parliament]] (MPs).


Following constitutional reforms in 1991, the office of President was transformed from an appointed to an elected post. Thus, both the President and MPs are elected to their posts by the [[Singaporean nationality law|citizens of Singapore]] in separate [[elections in Singapore|elections]].<ref>Constitution, Arts. 17(2) ("The President shall be elected by the citizens of Singapore in accordance with any law made by the Legislature.") and 39(1) ("Parliament shall consist of – (a) such number of elected Members as is required to be returned at a general election by the [[electoral district|constituencies]] prescribed by or under any law made by the Legislature; (b) such other members ... who shall be known as [[Non-Constituency Member of Parliament|non-constituency Members]] ...; and (c) such other Members ... who shall be known as [[Nominated Member of Parliament|nominated Members]] ..." The procedure for elections is governed by the {{Singapore legislation|title=Presidential Elections Act|cap=240A|ed=2011}} and the {{Singapore legislation|title=Parliamentary Elections Act|cap=218|ed=2011}}.</ref>
Following constitutional reforms in 1991, the office of president was transformed from an appointed to an elected post. Thus, both the president and MPs are elected to their posts by the [[Singaporean nationality law|citizens of Singapore]] in separate [[elections in Singapore|elections]].<ref>Constitution, Arts. 17(2) ("The President shall be elected by the citizens of Singapore in accordance with any law made by the Legislature.") and 39(1) ("Parliament shall consist of – (a) such number of elected Members as is required to be returned at a general election by the [[electoral district|constituencies]] prescribed by or under any law made by the Legislature; (b) such other members ... who shall be known as [[Non-Constituency Member of Parliament|non-constituency Members]] ...; and (c) such other Members ... who shall be known as [[Nominated Member of Parliament|nominated Members]] ..." The procedure for elections is governed by the {{Singapore legislation|title=Presidential Elections Act|cap=240A|ed=2011}} and the {{Singapore legislation|title=Parliamentary Elections Act|cap=218|ed=2011}}.</ref>


===Appointment of Cabinet===
===Appointment of Cabinet===
[[File:Halimah Yacob APEC Women and the Economy Forum 2012.jpg|thumb|150px|[[Halimah Yacob]], the incumbent [[President of Singapore]] .]]
[[File:Tharman Shanmugaratnam Official photo 2023.tif|thumb|208x208px|[[Tharman Shanmugaratnam]], the incumbent [[president of Singapore]].]]
The president appoints as prime minister an MP who is likely to command the confidence of the majority of the MPs.<ref name="Constitution Art. 25(1)">Singapore Constitution, Art. 25(1).</ref> In practice, the prime minister is usually the leader of the political party holding the majority of the seats in Parliament.<ref name="Thio 84">{{citation|author=[[Thio Li-ann]]|chapter=The Constitutional Framework of Powers|editor=Kevin Y L Tan |title=The Singapore Legal System|edition=2nd|location=Singapore|publisher=[[National University of Singapore|Singapore University Press]]|year=1999|page=67 at 84|isbn=978-9971-69-213-1}}.</ref>

The President appoints as Prime Minister an MP who, in his or her judgment, is likely to command the confidence of the majority of the MPs.<ref name="Constitution Art. 25(1)">Singapore Constitution, Art. 25(1).</ref> In practice, the Prime Minister is usually the leader of the political party holding the majority of the seats in Parliament.<ref name="Thio 84">{{citation|author=[[Thio Li-ann]]|chapter=The Constitutional Framework of Powers|editor=Kevin Y L Tan |title=The Singapore Legal System|edition=2nd|location=Singapore|publisher=[[National University of Singapore|Singapore University Press]]|year=1999|page=67 at 84|isbn=978-9971-69-213-1}}.</ref>


The President also appoints other Ministers to the Cabinet from among the MPs, acting in accordance with the Prime Minister's advice.<ref name="Constitution Art. 25(1)"/> Any MP, including a [[Non-Constituency Member of Parliament]] (NCMP) or a [[Nominated Member of Parliament]] (NMP), may be appointed a Minister. Thus it is possible for a person who was not elected by voters to be appointed by Parliament as an NMP, then by the President as a Minister. In 1990, then Deputy Prime Minister [[Goh Chok Tong]] said in Parliament: "I would rather that a government has the flexibility to appoint the right person to be the minister for finance, than to compel that government to select from whoever is available in the House."<ref>Speech of the First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence Goh Chok Tong on the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (Amendment) Bill, ''Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report'' (29 March 1990), vol. 55, col. 1045.</ref> However, he added that the Government had no intention to appoint a Cabinet minister from among the NMPs at that time. In May 2009, MP [[Hri Kumar]] proposed during a Parliamentary debate that this stand be reconsidered as the Prime Minister would be able to draw on the experience of many capable Singaporeans. He expressed the view that this would not offend democratic principles. Singapore's Parliamentary system placed more weight on the party in power rather than individual MPs, and "Parliamentarians must still win the support from the ground and, ultimately, the PM and the ruling party and his Cabinet team will still be answerable to the electorate at elections."<ref>Speech of MP Hri Kumar Nair on the President's Address, ''Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report'' (26 May 2009), vol. 86 (no column numbers assigned yet).</ref> Critics have commented that adopting the practice would disenchant Singaporeans, deepen the already [[parochialism|parochial]] political culture, and lead to a lack of accountability and legitimacy.<ref>{{citation|author=Jeremy Au Yong|author2=Zakir Hussain|title=Nominated ministers: Good or bad idea?|newspaper=[[The Straits Times]]|date=13 June 2009|page=A32}}.</ref>
The president also appoints other ministers to the Cabinet from among the MPs, acting in accordance with the prime minister's advice.<ref name="Constitution Art. 25(1)"/> Any MP, including a [[Non-Constituency Member of Parliament]] (NCMP) or a [[Nominated Member of Parliament]] (NMP), may be appointed a minister. Thus it is possible for a person who was not elected by voters to be appointed by Parliament as an NMP, then by the president as a minister. In 1990, then deputy prime minister [[Goh Chok Tong]] said in Parliament: "I would rather that a government has the flexibility to appoint the right person to be the minister for finance, than to compel that government to select from whoever is available in the House."<ref>Speech of the First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence Goh Chok Tong on the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (Amendment) Bill, ''Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report'' (29 March 1990), vol. 55, col. 1045.</ref> However, he added that the Government had no intention to appoint a Cabinet minister from among the NMPs at that time. In May 2009, then MP [[Hri Kumar]] proposed during a Parliamentary debate that this stand be reconsidered as the prime minister would be able to draw on the experience of many capable Singaporeans. He expressed the view that this would not offend democratic principles. Singapore's Parliamentary system placed more weight on the party in power rather than individual MPs, and "Parliamentarians must still win the support from the ground and, ultimately, the PM and the ruling party and his Cabinet team will still be answerable to the electorate at elections."<ref>Speech of MP Hri Kumar Nair on the President's Address, ''Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report'' (26 May 2009), vol. 86 (no column numbers assigned yet).</ref> Critics have commented that adopting the practice would disenchant Singaporeans, deepen the already [[parochialism|parochial]] political culture, and lead to a lack of accountability and legitimacy.<ref>{{citation|author=Jeremy Au Yong|author2=Zakir Hussain|title=Nominated ministers: Good or bad idea?|newspaper=[[The Straits Times]]|date=13 June 2009|page=A32}}.</ref>


Before entering on the duties of their office, the Prime Minister and other Ministers must take and [[wikt:subscribe#Verb|subscribe]] (sign) the Oath of Allegiance and an oath for the due execution of their offices before the President.<ref>Constitution. Art. 27.</ref> The Oath of Allegiance reads as follows:
Before entering on the duties of their office, the prime minister and other ministers must take and [[wikt:subscribe#Verb|subscribe]] (sign) the Oath of Allegiance and an oath for the due execution of their offices before the president.<ref>Constitution. Art. 27.</ref> The Oath of Allegiance reads as follows:


{{quote|I, [''name''], having been appointed to the office of [''name of office''], do solemnly swear [''or'' affirm] that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Republic of Singapore and that I will preserve, protect and defend the [[Constitution of Singapore|Constitution of the Republic of Singapore]].<ref>Constitution, 1st Sch., para. 2.</ref>}}
{{blockquote|I, [''name''], having been appointed to the office of [''name of office''], do solemnly swear [''or'' affirm] that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Republic of Singapore and that I will preserve, protect and defend the [[Constitution of Singapore|Constitution of the Republic of Singapore]].<ref>Constitution, 1st Sch., para. 2.</ref>}}


The oath for the due execution of the office of Prime Minister or a Minister is as follows:
The oath for the due execution of the office of prime minister or a minister is as follows:


{{quote|I, [''name''], being chosen and appointed as Prime Minister [''or'' Minister] of Singapore, do solemnly swear [''or'' affirm] that I will at all times faithfully discharge my duties as Prime Minister [''or'' Minister] according to law, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, without fear or favour, affection or ill-will.<ref>Constitution, 1st Sch., paras. 4 and 4A.</ref>}}
{{blockquote|I, [''name''], being chosen and appointed as Prime Minister [''or'' Minister] of Singapore, do solemnly swear [''or'' affirm] that I will at all times faithfully discharge my duties as Prime Minister [''or'' Minister] according to law, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, without fear or favour, affection or ill-will.<ref>Constitution, 1st Sch., paras. 4 and 4A.</ref>}}


Cabinet members are prohibited from holding any [[office of profit]] or actively engaging in any commercial enterprise.<ref>Constitution, Art. 33.</ref> In addition, they are required to comply with a ''Code of Conduct for Ministers''.<ref>{{citation|author=Lau Wah Ming, Secretary to the Cabinet|title=Code of Conduct for Ministers|url=http://www.getformesingapore.com/previous2005/020805_codeofconductforministers.htm|publisher=Cabinet of Singapore (reproduced on the Getforme Singapore website)|date=4 July 2005|access-date=26 April 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080612064850/http://www.getformesingapore.com/previous2005/020805_codeofconductforministers.htm|archive-date=12 June 2008|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}.</ref> For example, to counter potential allegations of corruption and unexplained wealth and to avoid potential conflicts between private interests and public responsibilities, the Code requires every Minister, upon appointment to office, to disclose in confidence to the President through the Prime Minister all sources of income other than his salary as a Minister and as an MP. This must include all assets, such as financial assets, real property, interests in any company or professional practice, and any other substantial personal assets as well as financial liabilities, including mortgages and borrowings.<ref>''Code of Conduct for Ministers'', para. 1.1.</ref> A Minister must also "scrupulously avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest between his office and his private financial interests".<ref>''Code of Conduct for Ministers'', para. 3.1.</ref> Thus, a Minister is not permitted to accept any favour of any kind from persons in negotiation with, or seeking to obtain any licence or enter into any contractual relations with, the Government,<ref>''Code of Conduct for Ministers'', para. 3.4.</ref> or to use official information that comes to him as a Minister for his own private profit or the profit of any family member or associate.<ref>''Code of Conduct for Ministers'', para. 3.5.</ref>
Cabinet members are prohibited from holding any [[office of profit]] or actively engaging in any commercial enterprise.<ref>Constitution, Art. 33.</ref> In addition, they are required to comply with a ''Code of Conduct for Ministers''.<ref>{{citation|author=Lau Wah Ming, Secretary to the Cabinet|title=Code of Conduct for Ministers|url=http://www.getformesingapore.com/previous2005/020805_codeofconductforministers.htm|publisher=Cabinet of Singapore (reproduced on the Getforme Singapore website)|date=4 July 2005|access-date=26 April 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080612064850/http://www.getformesingapore.com/previous2005/020805_codeofconductforministers.htm|archive-date=12 June 2008|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}.</ref> For example, to counter potential allegations of corruption and unexplained wealth and to avoid potential conflicts between private interests and public responsibilities, the Code requires every minister, upon appointment to office, to disclose in confidence to the president through the prime minister all sources of income other than his salary as a minister and as an MP. This must include all assets, such as financial assets, real property, interests in any company or professional practice, and any other substantial personal assets as well as financial liabilities, including mortgages and borrowings.<ref>''Code of Conduct for Ministers'', para. 1.1.</ref> A Minister must also "scrupulously avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest between his office and his private financial interests".<ref>''Code of Conduct for Ministers'', para. 3.1.</ref> Thus, a minister is not permitted to accept any favour of any kind from persons in negotiation with, or seeking to obtain any licence or enter into any contractual relations with, the Government,<ref>''Code of Conduct for Ministers'', para. 3.4.</ref> or to use official information that comes to him as a minister for his own private profit or the profit of any family member or associate.<ref>''Code of Conduct for Ministers'', para. 3.5.</ref>


===Vacation of office===
===Vacation of office===
The President must declare the office of Prime Minister vacant if the Prime Minister resigns his office, or if the President, acting in his discretion, is satisfied that the Prime Minister has ceased to command the confidence of a majority of the MPs. In the latter situation, the President is required first to inform the Prime Minister of his evaluation in this regard, and if the Prime Minister requests him to, the President may [[dissolution of parliament|dissolve Parliament]] instead of making a declaration of vacancy.<ref>Constitution, Art. 26(1).</ref> A [[general election]] must be held within three months after the dissolution of Parliament.<ref>Constitution, Art. 66.</ref> This gives the former Prime Minister the opportunity to consolidate support by receiving a fresh mandate at the polls.<ref name="Thio 84"/>
The president must declare the office of prime minister vacant if the prime minister resigns from office, or if the president, acting in his discretion, is satisfied that the prime minister has ceased to command the confidence of a majority of the MPs. In the latter situation, the president is required first to inform the prime minister of his evaluation in this regard, and if the prime minister requests him to, the president may [[dissolution of parliament|dissolve Parliament]] instead of making a declaration of vacancy.<ref>Constitution, Art. 26(1).</ref> A [[general election]] must be held within three months after the dissolution of Parliament.<ref>Constitution, Art. 66.</ref> This gives the former prime minister the opportunity to consolidate support by receiving a fresh mandate at the polls.<ref name="Thio 84"/>


At present, it is not clear what evidence the President may rely on to be satisfied that the Prime Minister has ceased to command the confidence of a majority of MPs, as the [[judicial system of Singapore|Singapore courts]] have not yet had to decide the issue. In the [[Sarawak]] case of ''Stephen Kalong Ningkan v. Tun Abang Haji Openg'',<ref>''Stephen Kalong Ningkan v. Tun Abang Haji Openg'' [1966] 2 M.L.J. [''Malayan Law Journal''] 187, declining to apply the approach taken by the [[Judicial Committee of the Privy Council|Privy Council]] on appeal from Nigeria in {{cite BAILII|litigants=Adegbenro v. Akintola|court=UKPC|year=1963|num=15|format=1|parallelcite=[1963] A.C. 614|courtname=auto|juris=Nigeria}}. See also {{citation|author=Thio Su Mien|title=Dismissal of Chief Ministers|journal=Malaya Law Review|year=1966|volume=8|page=203}}.</ref> decided on provisions similar to those in the Singapore Constitution, the court found that the phrase ''ceased to command the confidence of a majority of the Members of Parliament'' was a [[technical terminology|term of art]] which had to be signified by a formal [[motion of no confidence|vote of no confidence]] taken by the legislature. In contrast, a [[Sabah]] court held in ''Datuk Amir Kahar v. Tun Mohd Said bin Keruak, Yang di-Pertua Negeri Sabah''<ref>''Datuk Amir Kahar v. Tun Mohd Said bin Keruak, Yang di-Pertua Negeri Sabah'' [1995] 1 M.L.J. 169.</ref> that loss of confidence could be assessed on the basis of evidence other than a legislative vote.<ref name="Thio 85">Thio, "The Constitutional Framework of Powers", p. 85.</ref> This might include, for instance, media reports or letters addressed to the President.
At present, it is not clear what evidence the president may rely on to be satisfied that the prime minister has ceased to command the confidence of a majority of MPs, as the [[judicial system of Singapore|Singapore courts]] have not yet had to decide the issue. In the [[Sarawak]] case of ''Stephen Kalong Ningkan v. Tun Abang Haji Openg'',<ref>''Stephen Kalong Ningkan v. Tun Abang Haji Openg'' [1966] 2 M.L.J. [''Malayan Law Journal''] 187, declining to apply the approach taken by the [[Judicial Committee of the Privy Council|Privy Council]] on appeal from Nigeria in {{cite BAILII|litigants=Adegbenro v. Akintola|court=UKPC|year=1963|num=15|format=1|parallelcite=[1963] A.C. 614|courtname=auto|juris=Nigeria}}. See also {{citation|author=Thio Su Mien|title=Dismissal of Chief Ministers|journal=Malaya Law Review|year=1966|volume=8|page=203}}.</ref> decided on provisions similar to those in the Singapore Constitution, the court found that the phrase ''ceased to command the confidence of a majority of the Members of Parliament'' was a [[technical terminology|term of art]] which had to be signified by a formal [[motion of no confidence|vote of no confidence]] taken by the legislature. In contrast, a [[Sabah]] court held in ''Datuk Amir Kahar v. Tun Mohd Said bin Keruak, Yang di-Pertua Negeri Sabah''<ref>''Datuk Amir Kahar v. Tun Mohd Said bin Keruak, Yang di-Pertua Negeri Sabah'' [1995] 1 M.L.J. 169.</ref> that loss of confidence could be assessed on the basis of evidence other than a legislative vote.<ref name="Thio 85">Thio, "The Constitutional Framework of Powers", p. 85.</ref> This might include, for instance, media reports or letters addressed to the president.


Other Cabinet ministers must vacate their office if they resign, or if their appointments are revoked by the President acting in accordance with the advice of the Prime Minister.<ref>Constitution, Art. 26(2).</ref> A person who has vacated his or her office as Minister may, if qualified, be subsequently appointed again as a Minister.<ref>Constitution, Art. 26(3).</ref>
Other Cabinet ministers must vacate their office if they resign, or if their appointments are revoked by the president acting in accordance with the advice of the prime minister.<ref>Constitution, Art. 26(2).</ref> People who vacate their office as minister may, if qualified, be subsequently appointed again as a minister.<ref>Constitution, Art. 26(3).</ref>


The Prime Minister and other Ministers who make up the Cabinet do not vacate their offices upon a dissolution of Parliament, but continue in their posts until the first sitting of the next Parliament following a general election.<ref>Art. 26 of the Constitution does not list the dissolution of Parliament as a ground on which the Prime Minister and a minister must vacate their offices. In addition, Art. 25(2) states that an MP may be appointed as Prime Minister by the President when Parliament is dissolved, but that MP shall not continue to hold office after the first sitting of the next Parliament unless he is also an MP of that Parliament.</ref>
The prime minister and other ministers who make up the Cabinet do not vacate their offices upon a dissolution of Parliament, but continue in their posts until the first sitting of the next Parliament following a general election.<ref>Art. 26 of the Constitution does not list the dissolution of Parliament as a ground on which the Prime Minister and a minister must vacate their offices. In addition, Art. 25(2) states that an MP may be appointed as Prime Minister by the President when Parliament is dissolved, but that MP shall not continue to hold office after the first sitting of the next Parliament unless he is also an MP of that Parliament.</ref>


==Responsibilities and remuneration==
==Responsibilities and remuneration==
[[File:Lee Hsien Loong 2004-11-21.jpg|thumb|The Cabinet is headed by the Prime Minister, [[Lee Hsien Loong]], photographed here on 21 November 2004]]
[[File:Lawrence_Wong_20230526.jpg|thumb|The Cabinet is headed by the prime minister, [[Lawrence Wong]]]]


The executive authority of Singapore is vested in the President and is exercisable by him or by the Cabinet of Singapore or any Minister authorized by the Cabinet.<ref>Constitution, Art. 23(1).</ref> However, the President normally plays a nominal and largely ceremonial role in the executive branch of government. Although the President acts in his personal discretion in the exercise of certain functions as a check on the Cabinet and Parliament of Singapore,<ref>See, generally, Art. 21(2) of the Constitution.</ref> he is otherwise required to act in accordance with the advice of the Cabinet or of a Minister acting under the general authority of the Cabinet.<ref>Constitution, Art. 21(1).</ref> It is the Cabinet that has the general direction and control of the Government.<ref name="Constitution Art. 24(2)">Constitution, Art. 24(2).</ref> As Singapore follows the Westminster system of government, the [[legislation|legislative]] agenda of Parliament is determined by the Cabinet. At the start of each new [[legislative session|Parliamentary session]], the President gives an address prepared by the Cabinet that outlines what the Cabinet intends to achieve in the session.<ref>{{citation|title=Standing Orders of Parliament (as amended on 19 October 2004) |url=http://www.parliament.gov.sg/Publications/SO-merge%20with%20SO%20notes.pdf |format=PDF |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100509010912/http://www.parliament.gov.sg/Publications/SO-merge%20with%20SO%20notes.pdf |archive-date=9 May 2010 |publisher=[[Parliament of Singapore]] |date=19 October 2004 |access-date=25 May 2009 |url-status=dead |df=dmy }}, Orders 15(1) ("At the conclusion of the President's speech delivered at the opening of any session, Parliament shall stand adjourned without any question being put. The Leader of the House shall give two clear days' notice naming an ordinary sitting day, not less than two clear days after the day on which the speech was delivered, for the next sitting of Parliament, and Parliament shall sit on the day stated in such notice.") and 15(2) ("Such notice shall also give notice for such sitting day, of a motion to be moved by a Minister or other Member named by the Leader of the House that an Address expressing the thanks of Parliament for the speech of the President be agreed to. Debate thereon shall be confined to the policy of the Government as outlined in the speech."). See also Singapore Constitution, Art. 62: "The President may address Parliament and may send messages thereto."</ref>
The executive authority of Singapore is vested in the president and is exercisable by him or by the Cabinet of Singapore or any minister authorized by the Cabinet.<ref>Constitution, Art. 23(1).</ref> However, the president normally plays a nominal and largely ceremonial role in the executive branch of government. Although the president acts in his personal discretion in the exercise of certain functions as a check on the Cabinet and Parliament of Singapore,<ref>See, generally, Art. 21(2) of the Constitution.</ref> he is otherwise required to act in accordance with the advice of the Cabinet or of a minister acting under the general authority of the Cabinet.<ref>Constitution, Art. 21(1).</ref> It is the Cabinet that has the general direction and control of the Government.<ref name="Constitution Art. 24(2)">Constitution, Art. 24(2).</ref> As Singapore follows the Westminster system of government, the [[legislation|legislative]] agenda of Parliament is determined by the Cabinet. At the start of each new [[legislative session|Parliamentary session]], the president gives an address prepared by the Cabinet that outlines what the Cabinet intends to achieve in the session.<ref>{{citation|title=Standing Orders of Parliament (as amended on 19 October 2004) |url=http://www.parliament.gov.sg/Publications/SO-merge%20with%20SO%20notes.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100509010912/http://www.parliament.gov.sg/Publications/SO-merge%20with%20SO%20notes.pdf |archive-date=9 May 2010 |publisher=[[Parliament of Singapore]] |date=19 October 2004 |access-date=25 May 2009 |url-status=dead |df=dmy }}, Orders 15(1) ("At the conclusion of the President's speech delivered at the opening of any session, Parliament shall stand adjourned without any question being put. The Leader of the House shall give two clear days' notice naming an ordinary sitting day, not less than two clear days after the day on which the speech was delivered, for the next sitting of Parliament, and Parliament shall sit on the day stated in such notice.") and 15(2) ("Such notice shall also give notice for such sitting day, of a motion to be moved by a Minister or other Member named by the Leader of the House that an Address expressing the thanks of Parliament for the speech of the President be agreed to. Debate thereon shall be confined to the policy of the Government as outlined in the speech."). See also Singapore Constitution, Art. 62: "The President may address Parliament and may send messages thereto."</ref>


Under the Constitution, the Cabinet is [[Cabinet collective responsibility|collectively responsible]] to Parliament.<ref name="Constitution Art. 24(2)"/> In theory, Parliament acts as a check on the power of the Cabinet as Ministers are required to justify their actions and policies upon being questioned by MPs. However, in Singapore this is a weak check because the ruling People's Action Party holds a large Parliamentary majority, and party members who are MPs are required by [[party discipline]] to vote according to the [[whip (politics)|party Whip]]'s instructions.<ref name="Thio 85"/>
Under the Constitution, the Cabinet is [[Cabinet collective responsibility|collectively responsible]] to Parliament.<ref name="Constitution Art. 24(2)"/> In theory, Parliament acts as a check on the power of the Cabinet as ministers are required to justify their actions and policies upon being questioned by MPs. However, in Singapore this is a weak check because the ruling People's Action Party holds a large Parliamentary majority, and party members who are MPs are required by [[party discipline]] to vote according to the [[whip (politics)|party Whip]]'s instructions.<ref name="Thio 85"/>


The Cabinet may not be summoned except by the authority of the Prime Minister.<ref>Constitution, Art. 28(1).</ref> As far as is practicable, the Prime Minister is required to attend and preside at Cabinet meetings, but in his absence he may appoint another Minister to preside.<ref>Constitution, Art. 28(2).</ref>
The Cabinet may not be summoned except by the authority of the prime minister.<ref>Constitution, Art. 28(1).</ref> As far as is practicable, the prime minister is required to attend and preside at Cabinet meetings, but in his absence he may appoint another minister to preside.<ref>Constitution, Art. 28(2).</ref>


Whenever the Prime Minister is ill, absent from Singapore, or has been granted leave of absence from his duties, the functions conferred on him by the Constitution are exercisable by any other Minister authorized by the President.<ref>Constitution, Art. 26(4)(a). The President may revoke any such authority: Art. 26(4)(b).</ref> In general, the President must act in accordance with the Prime Minister's advice in appointing a Minister for this purpose. However, the President may act in his own discretion if in his opinion it is impracticable to obtain the advice of the Prime Minister due to his illness or absence.<ref>Constitution, Art. 26(4)(c).</ref>
Whenever the prime minister is ill, absent from Singapore, or has been granted leave of absence from his duties, the functions conferred on him by the Constitution are exercisable by any other minister authorized by the president.<ref>Constitution, Art. 26(4)(a). The President may revoke any such authority: Art. 26(4)(b).</ref> In general, the president must act in accordance with the prime minister's advice in appointing a minister for this purpose. However, the president may act in his own discretion if in his opinion it is impracticable to obtain the advice of the prime minister due to his illness or absence.<ref>Constitution, Art. 26(4)(c).</ref>


===Responsibilities of Ministers===
===Responsibilities of ministers===
The Prime Minister may, by giving written directions, charge any Minister with responsibility for any department or subject.<ref>Constitution, Art. 30(1).</ref> In practice, this is done by issuing notifications that are published in the ''Government Gazette''. For instance, the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (Responsibility of Senior Minister and Co-ordinating Minister for National Security, Prime Minister's Office) Notification 2009<ref>Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (Responsibility of Senior Minister and Co-ordinating Minister for National Security, Prime Minister's Office) Notification 2009 (S 142/2009).</ref> states:
The prime minister may, by giving written directions, charge any minister with responsibility for any department or subject.<ref>Constitution, Art. 30(1).</ref> In practice, this is done by issuing notifications that are published in the ''Government Gazette''. For instance, the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (Responsibility of senior minister and Co-ordinating Minister for National Security, Prime Minister's Office) Notification 2009<ref>Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (Responsibility of Senior Minister and Co-ordinating Minister for National Security, Prime Minister's Office) Notification 2009 (S 142/2009).</ref> states:


{{quote|It is hereby notified for general information that, pursuant to Article 30(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore, the Prime Minister has directed that Mr S. Jayakumar shall, with effect from 1 April 2009, be charged with the responsibility for the following matters:
{{blockquote|It is hereby notified for general information that, pursuant to Article 30(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore, the Prime Minister has directed that Mr S. Jayakumar shall, with effect from 1 April 2009, be charged with the responsibility for the following matters:
:(a) national security issues involving or affecting more than one Ministry;
:(a) national security issues involving or affecting more than one Ministry;
:(b) Chairmanship of the Security Policy Review Committee;
:(b) Chairmanship of the Security Policy Review Committee;
Line 112: Line 112:
and that he shall be designated as Senior Minister and Co-ordinating Minister for National Security.}}
and that he shall be designated as Senior Minister and Co-ordinating Minister for National Security.}}


Ministers may be designated by the Prime Minister to be in charge of particular [[organisation of the Government of Singapore|ministries]], or as Ministers in the [[Prime Minister's Office (Singapore)|Prime Minister's Office]]. Such Ministers were formerly known as [[Minister without portfolio|Ministers without portfolio]].
Ministers may be designated by the prime minister to be in charge of particular [[organisation of the Government of Singapore|ministries]], or as ministers in the [[Prime Minister's Office (Singapore)|Prime Minister's Office]]. Such ministers were formerly known as [[Minister without portfolio|ministers without portfolio]].


The Prime Minister may retain any department or subject in his charge.<ref>Constitution, Art. 30(2).</ref>
The prime minister may retain any department or subject in his charge.<ref>Constitution, Art. 30(2).</ref>


===Remuneration===
===Remuneration===


====Before 2010====
====Before 2010====
When Singapore gained its independence from Malaysia in 1965, the monthly salary received by the prime minister of the nation inherited from the chief minister position was Singapore was still a British colony, and was fixed at {{SGD|3,500|link=on}} ({{Inflation|SG|3500|1965|fmt=eq}}). The salary was not adjusted until in 1973, when a revision of ministerial pay was conducted, and the salary of the prime minister was increased to {{SGD|9,500}} ({{Inflation|SG|9,500|1965|fmt=eq}}). The justification given by then Prime Minister [[Lee Kuan Yew]] was to help select new leaders amidst a better economic position.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Lee Kuan Yew's salary as Prime Minister in 1973 was S$9,500 per month. His ministers? S$7,000.|url=https://mothership.sg/2018/05/ministerial-salaries-history-singapore/|access-date=2021-04-04|website=mothership.sg|language=en}}</ref>
When Singapore gained its independence from Malaysia in 1965, the prime minister's monthly salary was based on that of the chief minister when Singapore was still a British colony, and was fixed at {{SGD|3,500|link=on}} ({{Inflation|SG|3500|1965|fmt=eq}}). The monthly salary was not adjusted until 1973, when ministerial pay was revised and the prime minister's salary was increased to {{SGD|9,500}} ({{Inflation|SG|9,500|1965|fmt=eq}}) a month. The justification given by then prime minister [[Lee Kuan Yew]] was to help select new leaders amidst a better economic position.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Lee Kuan Yew's salary as Prime Minister in 1973 was S$9,500 per month. His ministers? S$7,000.|url=https://mothership.sg/2018/05/ministerial-salaries-history-singapore/|access-date=2021-04-04|website=mothership.sg|language=en}}</ref>


In 1994, then Prime Minister [[Goh Chok Tong]] received a monthly salary of nearly {{SGD|96,000}} ({{Inflation|SG|96,000|1965|fmt=eq}}, about {{SGD|1.15 million}} a year), while other ministers earned about {{SGD|48,900}} ({{Inflation|SG|48,900|1965|fmt=eq}}, about {{SGD|586,800}} a year). This made them among the highest paid government ministers in the world.<ref>{{citation|title=Singapore ministers, top bureaucrats get pay hike|publisher=[[Reuters]]|date=22 October 1994}}.</ref> In October that year, the Government issued a [[white paper#Government white papers|white paper]] entitled ''Competitive Salaries for Competent & Honest Government''<ref>{{citation|title=Competitive Salaries for Competent & Honest Government: Benchmarks for Ministers & Senior Public Officers: White Paper [Cmd. 13 of 1994]|location=Singapore|publisher=[[Prime Minister's Office (Singapore)|Prime Minister's Office]]|year=1994|isbn=978-9971-88-443-7}}.</ref> which proposed that the salaries of ministers and [[Singapore Civil Service|civil servants]] be pegged at two-thirds the average principal earned income of the top four earners in six professions: accounting, banking, engineering, law, local manufacturing firms and multinational corporations. These professions were chosen because their top members had general management skills which ministers also had to have. According to the white paper, the one-third "discount" would be "a visible demonstration of the sacrifice involved in becoming a minister". Although "[s]alaries should never be the motivation for persons to become ministers", the financial sacrifice had to be minimized if outstanding and committed Singaporeans were to be encouraged to take on the "risks and public responsibilities of a political career".<ref name="BT 19941022">{{citation|author=Chuang Peck Ming|title=Six professions to set pay for ministers and civil servants|newspaper=[[Business Times (Singapore)]]|date=22 October 1994}}. See also {{citation|author=Wang Hui Ling|author2=Chung Tsung Mien|author3=Jimmy Yap|title=32 say benchmarks too high, 25 think they are valid|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=28 October 1994}}; {{citation|author=Warren Fernandez|title=Will S'poreans back SM Lee's judgment on White Paper?|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=2 November 1994}}; {{citation|author=Chuang Peck Ming|title=MP warns of election backlash in debate on pay rise for ministers|newspaper=Business Times (Singapore)|date=4 November 1994}}.</ref> The benchmark would also be used to determine the pay of the President, Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister, Attorney-General, Chairman of the [[Public Service Commission (Singapore)|Public Service Commission]] and judges.<ref name="BT 19941022" />
In 1994, then prime minister [[Goh Chok Tong]] received a monthly salary of nearly {{SGD|96,000}} ({{Inflation|SG|96,000|1965|fmt=eq}}, about {{SGD|1.15 million}} a year), while other ministers earned about {{SGD|48,900}} ({{Inflation|SG|48,900|1965|fmt=eq}}, about {{SGD|586,800}} a year). This made them among the highest paid government ministers in the world.<ref>{{citation|title=Singapore ministers, top bureaucrats get pay hike|publisher=[[Reuters]]|date=22 October 1994}}.</ref> In October that year, the Government issued a [[white paper#Government white papers|white paper]] entitled ''Competitive Salaries for Competent & Honest Government''<ref>{{citation|title=Competitive Salaries for Competent & Honest Government: Benchmarks for Ministers & Senior Public Officers: White Paper [Cmd. 13 of 1994]|location=Singapore|publisher=[[Prime Minister's Office (Singapore)|Prime Minister's Office]]|year=1994|isbn=978-9971-88-443-7}}.</ref> which proposed that the salaries of ministers and [[Singapore Civil Service|civil servants]] be pegged at two-thirds the average principal earned income of the top four earners in six professions: accounting, banking, engineering, law, local manufacturing firms and multinational corporations. These professions were chosen because their top members had general management skills which ministers also had to have. According to the white paper, the one-third "discount" would be "a visible demonstration of the sacrifice involved in becoming a minister". Although "[s]alaries should never be the motivation for persons to become ministers", the financial sacrifice had to be minimized if outstanding and committed Singaporeans were to be encouraged to take on the "risks and public responsibilities of a political career".<ref name="BT 19941022">{{citation|author=Chuang Peck Ming|title=Six professions to set pay for ministers and civil servants|newspaper=[[Business Times (Singapore)]]|date=22 October 1994}}. See also {{citation|author=Wang Hui Ling|author2=Chung Tsung Mien|author3=Jimmy Yap|title=32 say benchmarks too high, 25 think they are valid|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=28 October 1994}}; {{citation|author=Warren Fernandez|title=Will S'poreans back SM Lee's judgment on White Paper?|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=2 November 1994}}; {{citation|author=Chuang Peck Ming|title=MP warns of election backlash in debate on pay rise for ministers|newspaper=Business Times (Singapore)|date=4 November 1994}}.</ref> The benchmark would also be used to determine the pay of the president, prime minister, deputy prime minister, Attorney-General, Chairman of the [[Public Service Commission (Singapore)|Public Service Commission]] and judges.<ref name="BT 19941022" />


Following Parliamentary approval of the white paper in November 1994,<ref>{{citation|author=Chuang Peck Ming|title=Why it's fitting to peg ministers' pay to top private sector earners|newspaper=Business Times (Singapore)|date=1 November 1994}}; {{citation|author=Chuang Peck Ming|title=White paper on salary benchmarks approved|newspaper=Business Times (Singapore)|date=4 November 1994}}.</ref> the Government established an independent panel to examine the benchmark for the Prime Minister's salary. The panel's report, released in January 1995, recommended that the benchmark be about $1.6 million a year, but said it would be reasonable for the Prime Minister to be paid $2.4 million in view of his heavy responsibilities. The Government said that in three years it planned to raise the pay of the Prime Minister to $1.46 million and that of ministers to 60% of the benchmark, and in the "longer term" to $1.6 million and two-thirds of the benchmark respectively.<ref>{{citation|author=Chuang Peck Ming|title=Independent panel recommends S$1.6m annual salary for S'pore PM|newspaper=Business Times (Singapore)|date=13 January 1995}}.</ref>
Following Parliamentary approval of the white paper in November 1994,<ref>{{citation|author=Chuang Peck Ming|title=Why it's fitting to peg ministers' pay to top private sector earners|newspaper=Business Times (Singapore)|date=1 November 1994}}; {{citation|author=Chuang Peck Ming|title=White paper on salary benchmarks approved|newspaper=Business Times (Singapore)|date=4 November 1994}}.</ref> the Government established an independent panel to examine the benchmark for the prime minister's salary. The panel's report, released in January 1995, recommended that the benchmark be about $1.6 million a year, but said it would be reasonable for the prime minister to be paid $2.4 million in view of his heavy responsibilities. The Government said that in three years it planned to raise the pay of the prime minister to $1.46 million and that of ministers to 60% of the benchmark, and in the "longer term" to $1.6 million and two-thirds of the benchmark respectively.<ref>{{citation|author=Chuang Peck Ming|title=Independent panel recommends S$1.6m annual salary for S'pore PM|newspaper=Business Times (Singapore)|date=13 January 1995}}.</ref>


In February 1996, it was reported that a survey of 19 countries by the [[World Economic Forum]] magazine ''World Link'' had found that political leaders and senior civil servants of Singapore had the highest salaries.{{citation needed|date=February 2020}} The pay of the Singapore Prime Minister (S$1.1 million, or US$812,858) was almost five times the average pay of the chief political executives of the nations surveyed (US$168,291). Senior civil servants were paid US$292,714, almost three times their counterparts' average pay.<ref>{{citation|author=Chua Mui Hoong|title=Ministers' pay – essential move despite political cost|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=4 February 1996}}.</ref>
In February 1996, it was reported that a survey of 19 countries by the [[World Economic Forum]] magazine ''World Link'' had found that political leaders and senior civil servants of Singapore had the highest salaries.{{citation needed|date=February 2020}} The pay of the Singapore prime minister (S$1.1 million, or US$812,858) was almost five times the average pay of the chief political executives of the nations surveyed (US$168,291). Senior civil servants were paid US$292,714, almost three times their counterparts' average pay.<ref>{{citation|author=Chua Mui Hoong|title=Ministers' pay – essential move despite political cost|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=4 February 1996}}.</ref>


In August 2000, in view of the Singapore economy's growth of almost 10% led by a rapid increase in exports, the salary of the Prime Minister was increased by 14% and those of other ministers by 12%. In response to public disquiet, Goh Chok Tong said that, spread across the population, the rises amounted to about $11 per person, equivalent to "about five plates of [[char kway teow]] &#91;fried noodles with [[cockle (bivalve)|cockles]]&#93; per Singaporean".<ref name="SCMP 20030112">{{citation|author=Jake Lloyd-Smith|title=A lesson from the Lion City|newspaper=[[South China Morning Post]]|date=12 January 2003|page=3}}.</ref> Subsequently, in late 2001, when Singapore experienced its [[early 2000s recession|worst recession in a generation]], ministerial pay was reduced by more than 17%. Nonetheless, it was reported that the prime minister still earned a gross annual salary of about $1.03 million before the variable component was taken into account.<ref name="SCMP 20030112"/>
In August 2000, in view of the Singapore economy's growth of almost 10% led by a rapid increase in exports, the salary of the prime minister was increased by 14% and those of other ministers by 12%. In response to public disquiet, Goh Chok Tong said that, spread across the population, the rises amounted to about $11 per person, equivalent to "about five plates of [[char kway teow]] &#91;fried noodles with [[cockle (bivalve)|cockles]]&#93; per Singaporean".<ref name="SCMP 20030112">{{citation|author=Jake Lloyd-Smith|title=A lesson from the Lion City|newspaper=[[South China Morning Post]]|date=12 January 2003|page=3}}.</ref> Subsequently, in late 2001, when Singapore experienced its [[early 2000s recession|worst recession in a generation]], ministerial pay was reduced by more than 17%. Nonetheless, it was reported that the prime minister still earned a gross annual salary of about $1.03 million before the variable component was taken into account.<ref name="SCMP 20030112"/>


In April 2007, the Prime Minister's annual salary increased to S$3.1 million ([[United States dollar|US$]]2.05 million), about five times that of the then [[President of the United States]] [[George W. Bush]] who earned US$400,000.<ref name="AP 20070409">{{citation|author=Derrick Ho|title=Singapore's government ministers to get pay raise of more than 60 percent by 2008|publisher=[[Associated Press]]|date=9 April 2007}}.</ref> The annual entry-level salary for ministers increased from $1.2 million to $1.6 million, and was projected to rise to 88% of the private sector benchmark by the end of 2008. Almost half of ministers' pay packages was made up of an individual performance bonus decided by the Prime Minister, and a variable bonus component based on the country's prevailing [[gross domestic product]] and capped at eight months of each minister's annual salary.<ref>{{citation|author=Derrick A. Paulo|title=In phases, tied to performance; Starting pay for ministers upped to $1.6m for now; 95% of civil servants will get raise|newspaper=Today|date=10 April 2007|page=3}}.</ref> The pay increases were justified by the Government on the grounds that the salaries had to keep pace with those in the private sector to attract the best talent and to avoid corruption. [[Teo Chee Hean]], the then [[Ministry of Defence (Singapore)|Minister for Defence]] and minister in charge of the civil service, was reported as saying: "We don't want pay to be the reason for people to join [the government]. But we also don't want pay to be the reason for them not to join us, or to leave after joining us."<ref name="AP 20070409"/> The increases sparked much debate both in and out of Parliament, with many people seeing ministerial pay as already being too high.<ref name="AP 20070409"/> During a Parliamentary debate on the issue, then [[Nominated Member of Parliament]] [[Thio Li-ann]] said: "It would be a sad indictment of my generation if no one came forward to serve without excessive monetary inducement, as to be bereft of deep convictions is to be impoverished indeed."<ref>{{citation|author=Lydia Lim|title=Beware a poverty of convictions|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=27 April 2007}}.</ref> On 11 April 2007, the Prime Minister [[Lee Hsien Loong]] told Parliament: "To make it quite clear why I am doing this, and also to give me the moral standing to defend this policy with Singaporeans, I will hold my own salary at the present level for five years. The government will pay me my full salary, because that is the way the system will have to work, but for five years, whatever the increase in the salary above its present level, I will donate to suitable good causes."<ref>{{citation|author=Daniel Buenas|title=PM Lee to donate salary increase for next 5 years to charity|newspaper=Business Times (Singapore)|date=12 April 2007}}; see also {{citation|title=Singapore PM in damage control on salary: analysts|publisher=[[Agence France Presse]]|date=12 April 2007}}.</ref> The following day, it was clarified that the Prime Minister had decided to do so a while ago, and that he had not been influenced by pressure arising from the announcement of the ministerial pay rise.<ref>{{citation|title=PM decided to donate his pay hikes a while ago|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=13 April 2007}}.</ref>
In April 2007, the prime minister's annual salary increased to S$3.1 million ([[United States dollar|US$]]2.05 million), about five times that of the then [[president of the United States]] [[George W. Bush]] who earned US$400,000.<ref name="AP 20070409">{{citation|author=Derrick Ho|title=Singapore's government ministers to get pay raise of more than 60 percent by 2008|publisher=[[Associated Press]]|date=9 April 2007}}.</ref> The annual entry-level salary for ministers increased from $1.2 million to $1.6 million, and was projected to rise to 88% of the private sector benchmark by the end of 2008. Almost half of ministers' pay packages was made up of an individual performance bonus decided by the prime minister, and a variable bonus component based on the country's prevailing [[gross domestic product]] and capped at eight months of each minister's annual salary.<ref>{{citation|author=Derrick A. Paulo|title=In phases, tied to performance; Starting pay for ministers upped to $1.6m for now; 95% of civil servants will get raise|newspaper=Today|date=10 April 2007|page=3}}.</ref> The pay increases were justified by the Government on the grounds that the salaries had to keep pace with those in the private sector to attract the best talent and to avoid corruption. [[Teo Chee Hean]], the then [[Ministry of Defence (Singapore)|Minister for Defence]] and minister in charge of the civil service, was reported as saying: "We don't want pay to be the reason for people to join [the government]. But we also don't want pay to be the reason for them not to join us, or to leave after joining us."<ref name="AP 20070409"/> The increases sparked much debate both in and out of Parliament, with many people seeing ministerial pay as already being too high.<ref name="AP 20070409"/> During a Parliamentary debate on the issue, then [[Nominated Member of Parliament]] [[Thio Li-ann]] said: "It would be a sad indictment of my generation if no one came forward to serve without excessive monetary inducement, as to be bereft of deep convictions is to be impoverished indeed."<ref>{{citation|author=Lydia Lim|title=Beware a poverty of convictions|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=27 April 2007}}.</ref> On 11 April 2007, then prime minister [[Lee Hsien Loong]] told Parliament: "To make it quite clear why I am doing this, and also to give me the moral standing to defend this policy with Singaporeans, I will hold my own salary at the present level for five years. The government will pay me my full salary, because that is the way the system will have to work, but for five years, whatever the increase in the salary above its present level, I will donate to suitable good causes."<ref>{{citation|author=Daniel Buenas|title=PM Lee to donate salary increase for next 5 years to charity|newspaper=Business Times (Singapore)|date=12 April 2007}}; see also {{citation|title=Singapore PM in damage control on salary: analysts|publisher=[[Agence France Presse]]|date=12 April 2007}}.</ref> The following day, it was clarified that the Prime Minister had decided to do so a while ago, and that he had not been influenced by pressure arising from the announcement of the ministerial pay rise.<ref>{{citation|title=PM decided to donate his pay hikes a while ago|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=13 April 2007}}.</ref>


In 2008, the annual salary for entry-level ministers was $1,924,300.<ref name="ST 20091127">{{citation|author=Sue-Ann Chia|title=Pay package of top civil servants and ministers down 22%|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=27 November 2009|page=A6}}.</ref> In view of the [[late 2000s recession in Asia#Singapore|worsening economic crisis in 2008–2009]], as of January 2009 the Prime Minister's salary was cut to $3.04 million, while the pay of ministerial-grade officers was reduced by 18% to $1.57 million.<ref>{{citation|author=Kenny Chee|title=Cut in annual pay for top civil servants|newspaper=[[My Paper]]|date=25 November 2008|page=A2}}.</ref> In November 2009, the Public Service Division announced that pay increments would be deferred for a second time in 2010 because of the uncertain economic recovery. A minister's 2009 salary of $1,494,700 per year was therefore 22% lower than the salary received in 2008.<ref name="ST 20091127"/>
In 2008, the annual salary for entry-level ministers was $1,924,300.<ref name="ST 20091127">{{citation|author=Sue-Ann Chia|title=Pay package of top civil servants and ministers down 22%|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=27 November 2009|page=A6}}.</ref> In view of the [[late 2000s recession in Asia#Singapore|worsening economic crisis in 2008–2009]], as of January 2009 the prime minister's salary was cut to $3.04 million, while the pay of ministerial-grade officers was reduced by 18% to $1.57 million.<ref>{{citation|author=Kenny Chee|title=Cut in annual pay for top civil servants|newspaper=[[My Paper]]|date=25 November 2008|page=A2}}.</ref> In November 2009, the Public Service Division announced that pay increments would be deferred for a second time in 2010 because of the uncertain economic recovery. A minister's 2009 salary of $1,494,700 per year was therefore 22% lower than the salary received in 2008.<ref name="ST 20091127"/>


====2011 review====
====2011 review====
As at 31 December 2010, the remuneration of ministers depended on which ministerial grade – from the lowest to the highest, MR4, MR3, MR2 or MR1 – they were at.<ref name="2011 Committee 13">{{citation|title=Salaries for a Capable and Committed Government |url=http://reviewcommittee2011.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/salaries-for-a-capable-and-committed-govt.pdf |format=PDF |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120104154450/http://reviewcommittee2011.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/salaries-for-a-capable-and-committed-govt.pdf |archive-date=4 January 2012 |location=Singapore |publisher=Committee to Review Ministerial Salaries |date=30 December 2011 |page=11, para. 13 |url-status=dead |df=dmy }} ("Ministerial salaries report").</ref> Each minister's pay package was made up of fixed components (a monthly salary for 12 months, a non-pensionable annual allowance of one month's salary, a special allowance of one month's salary, and a public service leadership allowance of two months' salary) and variable components (an annual variable component, a performance bonus, and a [[gross domestic product]] (GDP) bonus). The annual variable component of up to one and a half-month's salary was paid based on Singapore's economic performance. In years where economic performance was exceptional, a special variable payment was also made. Each minister's performance bonus was determined by the Prime Minister and could be up to 14 months' salary, though most good performers received the equivalent of nine months' salary. The GDP bonus depended on the nation's GDP growth rate. No bonus was paid if the rate was below 2%, and a maximum bonus of eight months' salary was paid if the rate was 10% or greater. In addition, ministers received the same medical benefits as civil servants.<ref>Ministerial salaries report, pp. 12–13, paras. 18–19.</ref> In 2010, the benchmark annual remuneration for an MR4-grade minister was $2,598,004, while the actual salary paid was $1,583,900.<ref name="2011 Committee 14">Ministerial salaries report, p. 11, para. 14.</ref> An MR1-grade minister's salary was $2,368,500.<ref>Ministerial salaries report, pp. 31–32, para. 85 and Table 3.</ref> The annual pay of the Prime Minister was set at a fixed ratio to the MR4 salary,<ref name="2011 Committee 13"/> and was $3,072,200 in 2010.<ref name="2011 Committee 14"/> This included a fixed service bonus in lieu of a performance bonus since there was no one to assess the Prime Minister's individual performance. The fixed service bonus was the same as the performance bonus paid to a good performer at the MR4 grade.<ref>Ministerial salaries report, p. 27, para. 77.</ref>
As at 31 December 2010, the remuneration of ministers depended on which ministerial grade – from the lowest to the highest, MR4, MR3, MR2 or MR1 – they were at.<ref name="2011 Committee 13">{{citation|title=Salaries for a Capable and Committed Government |url=http://reviewcommittee2011.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/salaries-for-a-capable-and-committed-govt.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120104154450/http://reviewcommittee2011.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/salaries-for-a-capable-and-committed-govt.pdf |archive-date=4 January 2012 |location=Singapore |publisher=Committee to Review Ministerial Salaries |date=30 December 2011 |page=11, para. 13 |url-status=dead |df=dmy }} ("Ministerial salaries report").</ref> Each minister's pay package was made up of fixed components (a monthly salary for 12 months, a non-pensionable annual allowance of one month's salary, a special allowance of one month's salary, and a public service leadership allowance of two months' salary) and variable components (an annual variable component, a performance bonus, and a [[gross domestic product]] (GDP) bonus). The annual variable component of up to one and a half-month's salary was paid based on Singapore's economic performance. In years where economic performance was exceptional, a special variable payment was also made. Each minister's performance bonus was determined by the prime minister and could be up to 14 months' salary, though most good performers received the equivalent of nine months' salary. The GDP bonus depended on the nation's GDP growth rate. No bonus was paid if the rate was below 2%, and a maximum bonus of eight months' salary was paid if the rate was 10% or greater. In addition, ministers received the same medical benefits as civil servants.<ref>Ministerial salaries report, pp. 12–13, paras. 18–19.</ref> In 2010, the benchmark annual remuneration for an MR4-grade minister was $2,598,004, while the actual salary paid was $1,583,900.<ref name="2011 Committee 14">Ministerial salaries report, p. 11, para. 14.</ref> An MR1-grade minister's salary was $2,368,500.<ref>Ministerial salaries report, pp. 31–32, para. 85 and Table 3.</ref> The annual pay of the prime minister was set at a fixed ratio to the MR4 salary,<ref name="2011 Committee 13"/> and was $3,072,200 in 2010.<ref name="2011 Committee 14"/> This included a fixed service bonus in lieu of a performance bonus since there was no one to assess the prime minister's individual performance. The fixed service bonus was the same as the performance bonus paid to a good performer at the MR4 grade.<ref>Ministerial salaries report, p. 27, para. 77.</ref>


On 21 May 2011, following the [[2011 Singaporean general election|2011 general election]], the Prime Minister announced that a committee would be appointed to review politicians' remuneration, and that revised salaries would take effect from that date. The committee to Review Ministerial Salaries chaired by [[Gerard Ee]] rendered its report on 30 December 2011, and released it to the public on 4 January 2012. As regards ministerial pay, the Committee recommended benchmarking an MR4-grade minister's salary to the [[median income]] of the top 1,000 wage earners who are [[Singaporean nationality law|Singapore citizens]], with a 40% discount "to signify the sacrifice that comes with the ethos of political service".<ref>Ministerial salaries report, p. 5.</ref> It also recommended removing the special allowance and public service leadership allowance; capping performance bonuses at six months' salary (with good performers generally receiving three months' salary); and replacing the GDP bonus with a national bonus based on four equally weighted indicators: the real [[median income]] growth rate (that is, the growth rate taking [[inflation]] into account), the real growth rate of the incomes of the lowest 20th [[percentile]] earners, the [[unemployment#Measurement|unemployment rate]], and the [[real gross domestic product|real GDP]] growth rate. As regards the latter, no bonus will be paid if the minimum targets for the indicators are not met. A bonus of three months' salary will be paid if the targets are met, and a maximum bonus of six months' salary if the targets are greatly exceeded.<ref>Ministerial salaries report, pp. 25–27, para. 76.</ref> This would result in a reduction of an M4-grade minister's annual salary by 31% of the 2010 figure to $1.1 million.<ref>Ministerial salaries report, p. 6. This is made up of a base pay of $715,000, a one-month annual variable component, a three-month performance bonus and a three-month national bonus* {{citation|author=Janice Heng|title=$1.1 million ministerial pay includes bonuses|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=12 January 2012|pages=A1 & A4}}.</ref><ref name="ST 20120105">See also {{citation|author=Lydia Lim|title=Ministers' starting pay cut to less than $1 million: Committee also proposes: Halving President's salary; Scrapping pensions, several allowances and bonuses|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=5 January 2012|pages=A1 & A4}}; {{citation|author=Janice Heng|title=Salaries to be based on larger pool of top income earners: Enlarged group more representative, reduces volatility of benchmark|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=5 January 2012|pages=A6–A7}}; {{citation|author=Loh Chee Kong|title=Deep cuts proposed to pay of political leaders|newspaper=Today|date=5 January 2012|pages=1 & 3}}.</ref>
On 21 May 2011, following the [[2011 Singaporean general election|2011 general election]], the prime minister announced that a committee would be appointed to review politicians' remuneration, and that revised salaries would take effect from that date. The committee to Review Ministerial Salaries, then chaired by [[Gerard Ee]] rendered its report on 30 December 2011, and released it to the public on 4 January 2012. As regards ministerial pay, the Committee recommended benchmarking an MR4-grade minister's salary to the [[median income]] of the top 1,000 wage earners who are [[Singaporean nationality law|Singapore citizens]], with a 40% discount "to signify the sacrifice that comes with the ethos of political service".<ref>Ministerial salaries report, p. 5.</ref> It also recommended removing the special allowance and public service leadership allowance; capping performance bonuses at six months' salary (with good performers generally receiving three months' salary); and replacing the GDP bonus with a national bonus based on four equally weighted indicators: the real [[median income]] growth rate (that is, the growth rate taking [[inflation]] into account), the real growth rate of the incomes of the lowest 20th [[percentile]] earners, the [[unemployment#Measurement|unemployment rate]], and the [[real gross domestic product|real GDP]] growth rate. As regards the latter, no bonus will be paid if the minimum targets for the indicators are not met. A bonus of three months' salary will be paid if the targets are met, and a maximum bonus of six months' salary if the targets are greatly exceeded.<ref>Ministerial salaries report, pp. 25–27, para. 76.</ref> This would result in a reduction of an M4-grade minister's annual salary by 31% of the 2010 figure to $1.1 million.<ref>Ministerial salaries report, p. 6. This is made up of a base pay of $715,000, a one-month annual variable component, a three-month performance bonus and a three-month national bonus* {{citation|author=Janice Heng|title=$1.1 million ministerial pay includes bonuses|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=12 January 2012|pages=A1 & A4}}.</ref><ref name="ST 20120105">See also {{citation|author=Lydia Lim|title=Ministers' starting pay cut to less than $1 million: Committee also proposes: Halving President's salary; Scrapping pensions, several allowances and bonuses|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=5 January 2012|pages=A1 & A4}}; {{citation|author=Janice Heng|title=Salaries to be based on larger pool of top income earners: Enlarged group more representative, reduces volatility of benchmark|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=5 January 2012|pages=A6–A7}}; {{citation|author=Loh Chee Kong|title=Deep cuts proposed to pay of political leaders|newspaper=Today|date=5 January 2012|pages=1 & 3}}.</ref>


Where the Prime Minister's remuneration was concerned, the Committee recommended that it be pegged to twice of a MR4-grade minister's salary and doing away with the fixed service bonus. Instead, the Prime Minister will receive a larger national bonus. His annual bonus where the targets for the indicators have been met will be six months' salary, and 12 months' salary where they have been greatly exceeded.<ref>Ministerial salaries report, p. 27, paras. 77–78.</ref> This will lead to a reduction in the Prime Minister's annual salary of 28% to $2.2 million (about US$1.7 million).<ref>Ministerial salaries report, p. 7.</ref> Lee Hsien Loong said that he accepted the committee's recommendations. He remains the best-paid head of government in the world, his proposed annual pay package exceeding that of the then [[Chief Executive of Hong Kong]] [[Sir Donald Tsang]], the political leader with the second-highest salary in the world (around US$550,000), by about three times; and that of then [[President of the United States]] [[Barack Obama]] (US$400,000)<ref>{{citation|author=Barbara L. Schwemle|title=Salaries of Federal Officials: A Fact Sheet &#91;Order Code 98-53 GOV&#93;|url=https://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/98-53.pdf|format=PDF|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130426025113/https://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/98-53.pdf|archive-date=26 April 2013|publisher=[[Congressional Research Service]]|date=11 January 2005|page=CRS-2}}.</ref> by over four times.<ref>{{citation|title=Singapore snip: Prime minister takes big pay cut: Austerity hits wealthy city-state as Lee Hsien Loong accepts 36% wage reduction. But he will still be world's best-paid leader|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jan/04/singapore-prime-minister-lee-loong|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120602011941/http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jan/04/singapore-prime-minister-lee-loong|archive-date=2 June 2012|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]|location=London|date=4 January 2012}}.</ref>
Where the prime minister's remuneration was concerned, the Committee recommended that it be pegged to twice of a MR4-grade minister's salary and doing away with the fixed service bonus. Instead, the prime minister will receive a larger national bonus. His annual bonus where the targets for the indicators have been met will be six months' salary, and 12 months' salary where they have been greatly exceeded.<ref>Ministerial salaries report, p. 27, paras. 77–78.</ref> This will lead to a reduction in the prime minister's annual salary of 28% to $2.2 million (about US$1.7 million).<ref>Ministerial salaries report, p. 7.</ref> Lee Hsien Loong said that he accepted the committee's recommendations. He remains the best-paid head of government in the world, his proposed annual pay package exceeding that of the then [[Chief Executive of Hong Kong]] [[Sir Donald Tsang]], the political leader with the second-highest salary in the world (around US$550,000), by about three times; and that of then [[president of the United States]] [[Barack Obama]] (US$400,000)<ref>{{citation|author=Barbara L. Schwemle|title=Salaries of Federal Officials: A Fact Sheet &#91;Order Code 98-53 GOV&#93;|url=https://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/98-53.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130426025113/https://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/98-53.pdf|archive-date=26 April 2013|publisher=[[Congressional Research Service]]|date=11 January 2005|page=CRS-2}}.</ref> by over four times.<ref>{{citation|title=Singapore snip: Prime minister takes big pay cut: Austerity hits wealthy city-state as Lee Hsien Loong accepts 36% wage reduction. But he will still be world's best-paid leader|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jan/04/singapore-prime-minister-lee-loong|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120602011941/http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jan/04/singapore-prime-minister-lee-loong|archive-date=2 June 2012|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]|location=London|date=4 January 2012}}.</ref>


The committee's report was discussed in Parliament from 16 to 18 January 2012. Setting out the position of the [[Workers' Party of Singapore|Workers' Party]], [[Chen Show Mao]] said that the basic monthly salary of an MP should be $11,000, the pay of an MX9-grade director in the Management Executive Scheme of the Civil Service. A minister should be paid five times this sum ($55,000), and the Prime Minister nine times ($99,000). then NCMP [[Gerald Giam]] said that ministers should obtain an average annual bonus of three months of their base salaries, and in any case no more than five months' bonus. Two-thirds of the bonus should be made up of the national bonus, and the remaining third based on the individual's performance, which should be determined according to [[performance indicator|key performance indicators]] fixed for each ministry at the start of a new government's term. Moreover, only a portion of bonuses should be paid at the end of each year. Payment of the remainder should be deferred till the end of the government's term. If the minister's performance is poor, some of the withheld bonus should be [[clawback|clawed back]].<ref>{{citation|author=Janice Heng|title=Pay ministers five times an MP's allowance: WP|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=17 January 2012|pages=A1 & A12}}; {{citation|author=Teo Xuanwei|title=No perfect solution to pay conundrum: DPM Teo|newspaper=Today|date=17 January 2012|pages=1 & 4}}.</ref><ref name="Today 20120117">{{citation|author=Tan Weizhen|title=Peg ministerial salaries to MPs' allowances: WP MP|newspaper=Today|date=17 January 2012|page=3}}.</ref> The WP's proposal was criticized by a number of PAP MPs. Senior Minister of State for Health [[Amy Khor]] expressed the view that "[p]olitical service is much more than public service. Civil servants are not subject to the votes of citizens nor do they need to carry the ground in policymaking. ... Pegging ministerial salaries to civil service salaries is not an adequate mechanism to account for the burdens and responsibilities that come with the job."<ref name="Today 20120117"/>
The committee's report was discussed in Parliament from 16 to 18 January 2012. Setting out the position of the [[Workers' Party of Singapore|Workers' Party]], [[Chen Show Mao]] said that the basic monthly salary of an MP should be $11,000, the pay of an MX9-grade director in the Management Executive Scheme of the Civil Service. A minister should be paid five times this sum ($55,000), and the prime minister nine times ($99,000). then NCMP [[Gerald Giam]] said that ministers should obtain an average annual bonus of three months of their base salaries, and in any case no more than five months' bonus. Two-thirds of the bonus should be made up of the national bonus, and the remaining third based on the individual's performance, which should be determined according to [[performance indicator|key performance indicators]] fixed for each ministry at the start of a new government's term. Moreover, only a portion of bonuses should be paid at the end of each year. Payment of the remainder should be deferred until the end of the government's term. If the minister's performance is poor, some of the withheld bonus should be [[clawback|clawed back]].<ref>{{citation|author=Janice Heng|title=Pay ministers five times an MP's allowance: WP|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=17 January 2012|pages=A1 & A12}}; {{citation|author=Teo Xuanwei|title=No perfect solution to pay conundrum: DPM Teo|newspaper=Today|date=17 January 2012|pages=1 & 4}}.</ref><ref name="Today 20120117">{{citation|author=Tan Weizhen|title=Peg ministerial salaries to MPs' allowances: WP MP|newspaper=Today|date=17 January 2012|page=3}}.</ref> The WP's proposal was criticized by a number of PAP MPs. Then senior Minister of State for Health [[Amy Khor]] expressed the view that "[p]olitical service is much more than public service. Civil servants are not subject to the votes of citizens nor do they need to carry the ground in policymaking. ... Pegging ministerial salaries to civil service salaries is not an adequate mechanism to account for the burdens and responsibilities that come with the job."<ref name="Today 20120117"/>


Rounding up the debate, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean said that under the WP's proposal for calculating ministerial salaries, the quantum achieved was similar to the sum proposed by the committee, and that in his view the WP had approved the three principles of the new system: the requirement for the pay to be competitive, recognition of the ethos of political service, and the desirability of a "clean wage" system (that is, one in which ministers do not receive additional benefits such as housing and medical allowances).<ref>{{citation|author=Tessa Wong|title=MPs favour clean wage system: Scheme with no hidden perks or benefits would be transparent, they say|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=17 January 2012|page=A11}}.</ref><ref name="ST 20130119">{{citation|author=Li Xueying|title='Real progress' in ministerial pay debate: Opposition's agreement on key points marks a breakthrough: DPM Teo|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=19 January 2012|pages=A1 & A6}}; {{citation|author=Esther Ng|title=A new formula, with a 'common ground': Recommendations on ministerial salaries passed after broad agreement on principles|newspaper=Today|date=19 January 2012|page=1}}.</ref> PAP MPs then voted to endorse the committee's proposals.<ref name="ST 20130119"/>
Rounding up the debate, then deputy prime minister Teo Chee Hean said that under the WP's proposal for calculating ministerial salaries, the quantum achieved was similar to the sum proposed by the committee, and that in his view the WP had approved the three principles of the new system: the requirement for the pay to be competitive, recognition of the ethos of political service, and the desirability of a "clean wage" system (that is, one in which ministers do not receive additional benefits such as housing and medical allowances).<ref>{{citation|author=Tessa Wong|title=MPs favour clean wage system: Scheme with no hidden perks or benefits would be transparent, they say|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=17 January 2012|page=A11}}.</ref><ref name="ST 20130119">{{citation|author=Li Xueying|title='Real progress' in ministerial pay debate: Opposition's agreement on key points marks a breakthrough: DPM Teo|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=19 January 2012|pages=A1 & A6}}; {{citation|author=Esther Ng|title=A new formula, with a 'common ground': Recommendations on ministerial salaries passed after broad agreement on principles|newspaper=Today|date=19 January 2012|page=1}}.</ref> PAP MPs then voted to endorse the committee's proposals.<ref name="ST 20130119"/>


On 26 March 2012, the Public Service Division of the Prime Minister's Office announced that the fixed component of the salary of a political appointment holder would be 13 months of his or her monthly salary. For 2011, the annual variable component of the salary would be 1.25 months plus $250, while the national bonus would be 2.625 months though appointment holders would receive a [[pro rata]] amount of 1.618 months' pay as the new salaries took effect from 21 May 2011 when the Cabinet was appointed following the general election. The targets for the four indicators making up the national bonus were 2–3% for real median income growth of citizens and real median income growth for the lowest 20th percentile of citizens, 3–5% for real GDP growth, and not more than 4.5% for the unemployment rate of citizens. Each appointment holder's performance bonus would be determined by the Prime Minister.<ref>{{citation|title=Ministers and office-holders to get National Bonus of 1.6 months|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=27 March 2012|page=A3}}; {{citation|title=1.618 months pro-rated National Bonus for political office-holders|newspaper=Today|date=27 March 2012|page=1}}.</ref>
On 26 March 2012, the Public Service Division of the Prime Minister's Office announced that the fixed component of the salary of a political appointment holder would be 13 months of his or her monthly salary. For 2011, the annual variable component of the salary would be 1.25 months plus $250, while the national bonus would be 2.625 months though appointment holders would receive a [[pro rata]] amount of 1.618 months' pay as the new salaries took effect from 21 May 2011 when the Cabinet was appointed following the general election. The targets for the four indicators making up the national bonus were 2–3% for real median income growth of citizens and real median income growth for the lowest 20th percentile of citizens, 3–5% for real GDP growth, and not more than 4.5% for the unemployment rate of citizens. Each appointment holder's performance bonus would be determined by the prime minister.<ref>{{citation|title=Ministers and office-holders to get National Bonus of 1.6 months|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=27 March 2012|page=A3}}; {{citation|title=1.618 months pro-rated National Bonus for political office-holders|newspaper=Today|date=27 March 2012|page=1}}.</ref>


====Pensions====
====Pensions====
At present, persons who have reached the age of 50 years and retired as MPs and who have served in this capacity for not less than nine years may be granted a [[pension]] for the rest of their lives. The annual amount payable is {{frac|1|30}} of the person's highest annual salary for every completed year of service and {{frac|1|360}} for every uncompleted year, up to a ceiling of two-thirds of the Member's annual salary.<ref>{{Singapore legislation|title=Parliamentary Pensions Act|cap=219|ed=1996}}, s. 3.</ref> In addition, a retired MP who is at least 50 years old and has for not less than eight years held the office of Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister, [[Senior Minister of Singapore|Senior Minister]] or Minister<ref>The Parliamentary Pensions Act, s. 2(1), defines ''office'' as "the office of Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister, Speaker, Senior Minister, Minister, Senior Minister of State, Minister of State, Mayor, Senior Parliamentary Secretary, Parliamentary Secretary or Political Secretary".</ref> may receive an additional pension each year of {{frac|1|27}} of his or her highest annual salary for each completed year of service and {{frac|1|324}} for each uncompleted year, subject again to a ceiling of two-thirds of the office-holder's annual salary.<ref>Parliamentary Pensions Act, s. 4.</ref> Members who have reached the age of 55 years and have served not less than eight years as Ministers may be granted a pension even if they have not yet ceased to hold office.<ref>Parliamentary Pensions Act, s. 5.</ref> No person has an absolute right to compensation for past services or to any pension or gratuity, and the President may reduce or withhold pensions and gratuities upon an MP's conviction for corruption.<ref>Parliamentary Pensions Act, s. 13.</ref>
At present, persons who have reached the age of 50 years and retired as MPs and who have served in this capacity for not less than nine years may be granted a [[pension]] for the rest of their lives. The annual amount payable is {{frac|1|30}} of the person's highest annual salary for every completed year of service and {{frac|1|360}} for every uncompleted year, up to a ceiling of two-thirds of the Member's annual salary.<ref>{{Singapore legislation|title=Parliamentary Pensions Act|cap=219|ed=1996}}, s. 3.</ref> In addition, a retired MP who is at least 50 years old and has for not less than eight years held the office of prime minister, deputy prime minister, [[Senior Minister of Singapore|senior minister]] or minister<ref>The Parliamentary Pensions Act, s. 2(1), defines ''office'' as "the office of Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister, Speaker, Senior Minister, Minister, Senior Minister of State, Minister of State, Mayor, Senior Parliamentary Secretary, Parliamentary Secretary or Political Secretary".</ref> may receive an additional pension each year of {{frac|1|27}} of his or her highest annual salary for each completed year of service and {{frac|1|324}} for each uncompleted year, subject again to a ceiling of two-thirds of the office-holder's annual salary.<ref>Parliamentary Pensions Act, s. 4.</ref> Members who have reached the age of 55 years and have served not less than eight years as ministers may be granted a pension even if they have not yet ceased to hold office.<ref>Parliamentary Pensions Act, s. 5.</ref> No person has an absolute right to compensation for past services or to any pension or gratuity, and the president may reduce or withhold pensions and gratuities upon an MP's conviction for corruption.<ref>Parliamentary Pensions Act, s. 13.</ref>


The committee to Review Ministerial Salaries recommended that pensions for political appointment holders be abolished in favour of [[Central Provident Fund]] payments. Appointment holders appointed on and after 21 May 2011 will not receive any pension, while those appointed before that date will only be eligible for pensions accrued up to that date. Such pensions will be paid after they step down or retire from office.<ref>Ministerial salaries report, pp. 27–28, paras. 79–80.</ref> If the removal of pensions is taken into account, the Prime Minister's annual salary will be reduced from the 2010 figure by 36%, and that of MR4-grade ministers by 37%.<ref name="ST 20120105"/><ref>Ministerial salaries report, pp. 6–7. See also {{citation|author=Elgin Toh|title=Pension system for political office-holders to be scrapped|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=5 January 2012|page=A7}}.</ref>
The committee to Review Ministerial Salaries recommended that pensions for political appointment holders be abolished in favour of [[Central Provident Fund]] payments. Appointment holders appointed on and after 21 May 2011 will not receive any pension, while those appointed before that date will only be eligible for pensions accrued up to that date. Such pensions will be paid after they step down or retire from office.<ref>Ministerial salaries report, pp. 27–28, paras. 79–80.</ref> If the removal of pensions is taken into account, the prime minister's annual salary will be reduced from the 2010 figure by 36%, and that of MR4-grade ministers by 37%.<ref name="ST 20120105"/><ref>Ministerial salaries report, pp. 6–7. See also {{citation|author=Elgin Toh|title=Pension system for political office-holders to be scrapped|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=5 January 2012|page=A7}}.</ref>


==Current Cabinet==
==Current cabinet==
{{Main|Fifth Lee Hsien Loong Cabinet}}
{{Main|First Lawrence Wong Cabinet}}

{{#section-h:Fifth Lee Hsien Loong Cabinet|Current Cabinet}}
{{#section-h:First Lawrence Wong Cabinet|Composition}}


==Timeline of members==
==Timeline of members==
Line 168: Line 169:
* '''9th Cabinet''' (formed November 1990): Goh Chok Tong '''(PM)''', Lee Kuan Yew '''(SM)''', Ong Teng Cheong, Lee Hsien Loong '''(DPM)''', S. Jayakumar, Richard Hu, Wong Kan Seng, [[Yeo Ning Hong]] '''(S)'''
* '''9th Cabinet''' (formed November 1990): Goh Chok Tong '''(PM)''', Lee Kuan Yew '''(SM)''', Ong Teng Cheong, Lee Hsien Loong '''(DPM)''', S. Jayakumar, Richard Hu, Wong Kan Seng, [[Yeo Ning Hong]] '''(S)'''
* '''10th Cabinet''' (formed September 1991): Goh Chok Tong, Lee Kuan Yew, Ong Teng Cheong, Lee Hsien Loong, Tony Tan '''(DPM)''', S. Jayakumar, Richard Hu, Wong Kan Seng, Yeo Ning Hong, [[Lee Boon Yang]] '''(S)'''
* '''10th Cabinet''' (formed September 1991): Goh Chok Tong, Lee Kuan Yew, Ong Teng Cheong, Lee Hsien Loong, Tony Tan '''(DPM)''', S. Jayakumar, Richard Hu, Wong Kan Seng, Yeo Ning Hong, [[Lee Boon Yang]] '''(S)'''
* '''11th Cabinet''' (formed January 1997): Goh Chok Tong, Lee Kuan Yew, Lee Hsien Loong, Tony Tan, S. Jayakumar, Wong Kan Seng
* '''11th Cabinet''' (formed January 1997): Goh Chok Tong, Lee Kuan Yew, Lee Hsien Loong, Tony Tan, S. Jayakumar, Richard Hu, Wong Kan Seng
* '''12th Cabinet''' (formed November 2001): Goh Chok Tong, Lee Kuan Yew, Lee Hsien Loong, Tony Tan, S. Jayakumar, Wong Kan Seng, [[Teo Chee Hean]] '''(S)'''
* '''12th Cabinet''' (formed November 2001): Goh Chok Tong, Lee Kuan Yew, Lee Hsien Loong, Tony Tan, S. Jayakumar, Wong Kan Seng, [[Teo Chee Hean]] '''(S)'''
* '''13th Cabinet''' (formed August 2004): Lee Hsien Loong '''(PM)''', Goh Chok Tong '''(SM)''', Lee Kuan Yew '''(MM)''', Tony Tan, S. Jayakumar '''(DPM)''', Wong Kan Seng, Teo Chee Hean, [[George Yeo]]
* '''13th Cabinet''' (formed August 2004): Lee Hsien Loong '''(PM)''', Goh Chok Tong '''(SM)''', Lee Kuan Yew '''(MM)''', Tony Tan, S. Jayakumar '''(DPM)''', Wong Kan Seng, Teo Chee Hean, [[George Yeo]]
Line 174: Line 175:
* '''15th Cabinet''' (formed May 2011): Lee Hsien Loong, Teo Chee Hean, Tharman Shanmugaratnam '''(DPM)''', K. Shanmugam, [[Ng Eng Hen]]
* '''15th Cabinet''' (formed May 2011): Lee Hsien Loong, Teo Chee Hean, Tharman Shanmugaratnam '''(DPM)''', K. Shanmugam, [[Ng Eng Hen]]
* '''16th Cabinet''' (formed September 2015): Lee Hsien Loong, [[Heng Swee Keat]] '''(DPM)''', Teo Chee Hean '''(SM)''', Tharman Shanmugaratnam '''(SM)''', K. Shanmugam, Ng Eng Hen, [[Vivian Balakrishnan]]
* '''16th Cabinet''' (formed September 2015): Lee Hsien Loong, [[Heng Swee Keat]] '''(DPM)''', Teo Chee Hean '''(SM)''', Tharman Shanmugaratnam '''(SM)''', K. Shanmugam, Ng Eng Hen, [[Vivian Balakrishnan]]
* '''17th Cabinet''' (formed July 2020): Lee Hsien Loong, Heng Swee Keat, [[Lawrence Wong]] '''(DPM)''', Teo Chee Hean, Tharman Shanmugaratnam, K. Shanmugam, Ng Eng Hen, Vivian Balakrishnan
* '''17th Cabinet''' (formed July 2020): Lee Hsien Loong, Heng Swee Keat, [[Lawrence Wong]] '''(DPM)''', Teo Chee Hean, Tharman Shanmugaratnam '''(R)''', K. Shanmugam, Ng Eng Hen, Vivian Balakrishnan
* '''18th Cabinet''' (formed May 2024): Lawrence Wong '''(PM)''', Lee Hsien Loong '''(SM)''', Heng Swee Keat, [[Gan Kim Yong]] '''(DPM)''', Teo Chee Hean, K. Shanmugam, Ng Eng Hen, Vivian Balakrishnan


Notes:
Notes:
* '''(PM)''': Appointed Prime Minister
* '''(PM)''': Appointed prime minister
* '''(DPM)''': Appointed Deputy Prime Minister
* '''(DPM)''': Appointed deputy prime minister
* '''(SM)''': Appointed Senior Minister
* '''(SM)''': Appointed senior minister
* '''(MM)''': Appointed Minister Mentor
* '''(MM)''': Appointed minister mentor
* '''(S)''': Appointed via cabinet reshuffle
* '''(S)''': Appointed via cabinet reshuffle
* '''(L)''': Lost re-election
* '''(L)''': Lost re-election
* '''(R)''': Resigned from office
* '''(†)''': Died in office
* '''(†)''': Died in office


{{#tag:timeline|
{{#tag:timeline
ImageSize = width:1230 height:auto barincrement:11
|ImageSize = width:1230 height:auto barincrement:11
PlotArea = top:30 bottom:50 right:190 left:20
PlotArea = top:30 bottom:50 right:190 left:20
AlignBars = late
AlignBars = late
Line 201: Line 204:
Colors =
Colors =
Id:pm value:rgb(1,0,0) legend: Prime_minister
Id:pm value:rgb(1,0,0) legend: Prime_minister
Id:dpm value:rgb(0,1,0) legend: Deputy_prime_minister
Id:dpm value:rgb(0,1,0) legend: Deputy_prime_minister
Id:sm value:rgb(0,1,1) legend: Senior_minister
Id:sm value:rgb(0,1,1) legend: Senior_minister
Id:mof value:rgb(0.7,0.7,0.7) legend: Finance_minister
Id:mof value:rgb(0.7,0.7,0.7) legend: Finance_minister
Line 208: Line 211:
Id:mha value:lightpurple legend: Home_affairs_minister
Id:mha value:lightpurple legend: Home_affairs_minister
Id:moe value:orange legend: Education_minister
Id:moe value:orange legend: Education_minister
Id:cabinet value:rgb(0,0,1) legend: Cabinet
Id:cabinet value:rgb(0,0,1) legend: Cabinet
Id:mp value:rgb(0.75,0.75,1) legend: MP_(non-Cabinet)
Id:mp value:rgb(0.75,0.75,1) legend: MP_(non-Cabinet)
Id:time value:rgb(0.9,0.9,0.9)
Id:time value:rgb(0.9,0.9,0.9)
Line 240: Line 243:
Define $cb16 = 01/10/2015
Define $cb16 = 01/10/2015
Define $cb17 = 27/07/2020
Define $cb17 = 27/07/2020
Define $cb18 = 15/05/2024


# Definition of general elections.
# Definition of general elections.
Line 284: Line 288:
at:$cb16
at:$cb16
at:$cb17
at:$cb17
at:$cb18


TextData =
TextData =
Line 393: Line 398:
bar:ongyekung
bar:ongyekung
bar:ngcheemeng
bar:ngcheemeng
bar:cheehongtat


#2020 GE batch:
#2020 GE batch:
Line 435: Line 441:
bar:cb0 from: $cb17 till: $cb17 color:time text:"[[Fifth Lee Hsien Loong Cabinet|17th]]"
bar:cb0 from: $cb17 till: $cb17 color:time text:"[[Fifth Lee Hsien Loong Cabinet|17th]]"
bar:cb1 from: $cb17 till: $cb17 color:time text:"Cabinet"
bar:cb1 from: $cb17 till: $cb17 color:time text:"Cabinet"
bar:cb0 from: $cb18 till: $cb18 color:time text:"[[First Lawrence Wong Cabinet|18th]]"
bar:cb1 from: $cb18 till: $cb18 color:time text:"Cabinet"


bar:lky from: $ge4 till: 23/03/2015 color:mp text:"[[Lee Kuan Yew]]"
bar:lky from: $ge4 till: 23/03/2015 color:mp text:"[[Lee Kuan Yew]]"
bar:lky from: $cb1 till: $cb9 color:pm
bar:lky from: $cb1 till: $cb9 color:pm
bar:lky from: $cb9 till: $cb13 color:sm
bar:lky from: $cb9 till: $cb13 color:sm
bar:lky from: $cb13 till: $cb15 color:cabinet
bar:lky from: $cb13 till: $cb15 color:cabinet


bar:tohchinchye from: $ge4 till: 17/08/1988 color:mp text:"[[Toh Chin Chye]]"
bar:tohchinchye from: $ge4 till: 17/08/1988 color:mp text:"[[Toh Chin Chye]]"
bar:tohchinchye from: $cb1 till: 02/08/1968 color:dpm
bar:tohchinchye from: $cb1 till: 02/08/1968 color:dpm
bar:tohchinchye from: 02/08/1965 till: $cb6 color:cabinet
bar:tohchinchye from: 02/08/1965 till: $cb6 color:cabinet


bar:gohkengswee from: $ge4 till: $cb1 color:mp
bar:gohkengswee from: $ge4 till: $cb1 color:mp
bar:gohkengswee from: $cb1 till: $independence color:mof
bar:gohkengswee from: $cb1 till: $independence color:mof
bar:gohkengswee from: $independence till: 16/08/1967 color:mindef
bar:gohkengswee from: $independence till: 16/08/1967 color:mindef
bar:gohkengswee from: 16/08/1967 till: 10/08/1970 color:mof
bar:gohkengswee from: 16/08/1967 till: 10/08/1970 color:mof
bar:gohkengswee from: 10/08/1970 till: 20/03/1973 color:mindef
bar:gohkengswee from: 10/08/1970 till: 20/03/1973 color:mindef
Line 463: Line 471:
bar:ongpangboon from: $merger till: $cb2 color:cabinet
bar:ongpangboon from: $merger till: $cb2 color:cabinet
bar:ongpangboon from: $cb2 till: 10/08/1970 color:moe
bar:ongpangboon from: $cb2 till: 10/08/1970 color:moe
bar:ongpangboon from: 10/08/1970 till: $cb7 color:cabinet
bar:ongpangboon from: 10/08/1970 till: $cb7 color:cabinet


bar:yongnyuklin from: $ge4 till: $be79 color:mp text:"[[Yong Nyuk Lin]]"
bar:yongnyuklin from: $ge4 till: $be79 color:mp text:"[[Yong Nyuk Lin]]"
bar:yongnyuklin from: $cb1 till: 31/07/1975 color:cabinet
bar:yongnyuklin from: $cb1 till: 31/07/1975 color:cabinet


bar:kmbyrne from: $ge4 till: $ge5 color:mp text:"[[Kenneth Michael Byrne]]"
bar:kmbyrne from: $ge4 till: $ge5 color:mp text:"[[Kenneth Michael Byrne]]"
bar:kmbyrne from: $cb1 till: $cb2 color:cabinet
bar:kmbyrne from: $cb1 till: $cb2 color:cabinet


bar:ahmadibrahim from: $ge4 till: $cb1 color:mp
bar:ahmadibrahim from: $ge4 till: $cb1 color:mp
bar:ahmadibrahim from: $cb1 till: 21/08/1962 color:cabinet text:"[[Ahmad Ibrahim (Singaporean politician)|Ahmad Ibrahim]]"
bar:ahmadibrahim from: $cb1 till: 21/08/1962 color:cabinet text:"[[Ahmad Ibrahim (Singaporean politician)|Ahmad Ibrahim]]"


bar:ongengguan from: $ge4 till: $be65 color:mp text:"[[Ong Eng Guan]]"
bar:ongengguan from: $ge4 till: $be65 color:mp text:"[[Ong Eng Guan]]"
bar:ongengguan from: $cb1 till: 20/06/1960 color:cabinet
bar:ongengguan from: $cb1 till: 20/06/1960 color:cabinet


bar:tankiagan from: $ge4 till: $ge5 color:mp
bar:tankiagan from: $ge4 till: $ge5 color:mp
bar:tankiagan from: 25/08/1960 till: $cb2 color:cabinet text:"[[Tan Kia Gan]]"
bar:tankiagan from: 25/08/1960 till: $cb2 color:cabinet text:"[[Tan Kia Gan]]"


bar:limkimsan from: $ge5 till: $ge9 color:mp
bar:limkimsan from: $ge5 till: $ge9 color:mp
bar:limkimsan from: $cb2 till: $independence color:cabinet
bar:limkimsan from: $cb2 till: $independence color:cabinet
bar:limkimsan from: $independence till: 17/08/1967 color:mof
bar:limkimsan from: $independence till: 17/08/1967 color:mof
Line 487: Line 495:
bar:limkimsan from: $cb4 till: $cb6 color:cabinet text:"[[Lim Kim San]]"
bar:limkimsan from: $cb4 till: $cb6 color:cabinet text:"[[Lim Kim San]]"


bar:jekyeunthong from: $ge5 till: $ge9 color:mp
bar:jekyeunthong from: $ge5 till: $ge9 color:mp
bar:jekyeunthong from:$cb2 till: $cb6 color:cabinet text:"[[Jek Yeun Thong]]"
bar:jekyeunthong from:$cb2 till: $cb6 color:cabinet text:"[[Jek Yeun Thong]]"

bar:othmanwok from: $ge5 till: $ge9 color:mp
bar:othmanwok from: $ge5 till: $ge9 color:mp
bar:othmanwok from: $cb2 till: $cb6 color:cabinet text:"[[Othman Wok]]"
bar:othmanwok from: $cb2 till: $cb6 color:cabinet text:"[[Othman Wok]]"


bar:edmundwbarker from: $ge5 till: $ge11 color:mp
bar:edmundwbarker from: $ge5 till: $ge11 color:mp
bar:edmundwbarker from: 31/10/1964 till: $cb4 color:cabinet
bar:edmundwbarker from: 31/10/1964 till: $cb4 color:cabinet
bar:edmundwbarker from: $cb4 till: 31/10/1972 color:mha
bar:edmundwbarker from: $cb4 till: 31/10/1972 color:mha
Line 499: Line 507:


bar:chuasianchin from: $ge6 till: $ge12 color:mp text:"[[Chua Sian Chin]]"
bar:chuasianchin from: $ge6 till: $ge12 color:mp text:"[[Chua Sian Chin]]"
bar:chuasianchin from: $cb3 till: 31/10/1972 color:cabinet
bar:chuasianchin from: $cb3 till: 31/10/1972 color:cabinet
bar:chuasianchin from: 31/10/1972 till: $cb7 color:mha
bar:chuasianchin from: 31/10/1972 till: $cb7 color:mha


bar:leechiawmeng from: $ge6 till: $ge10 color:mp text:"[[Lee Chiaw Meng]]"
bar:leechiawmeng from: $ge6 till: $ge10 color:mp text:"[[Lee Chiaw Meng]]"
bar:leechiawmeng from: $cb4 till: 01/06/1975 color:moe
bar:leechiawmeng from: $cb4 till: 01/06/1975 color:moe
bar:leechiawmeng from: 01/06/1975 till: $cb5 color:cabinet
bar:leechiawmeng from: 01/06/1975 till: $cb5 color:cabinet


bar:wonglinken from: $ge6 till: $ge8 color:mp text:"[[Wong Lin Ken]]"
bar:wonglinken from: $ge6 till: $ge8 color:mp text:"[[Wong Lin Ken]]"
bar:wonglinken from: 06/09/1970 till: $cb4 color:mha
bar:wonglinken from: 06/09/1970 till: $cb4 color:mha


bar:honsuisen from: $be70 till: 14/10/1983 color:mp text:"[[Hon Sui Sen]]"
bar:honsuisen from: $be70 till: 14/10/1983 color:mp text:"[[Hon Sui Sen]]"
bar:honsuisen from: 11/08/1970 till: 14/10/1983 color:mof
bar:honsuisen from: 11/08/1970 till: 14/10/1983 color:mof

bar:ongtengcheong from: $ge7 till: 16/08/1993 color:mp text:"[[Ong Teng Cheong]]"
bar:ongtengcheong from: $ge7 till: 16/08/1993 color:mp text:"[[Ong Teng Cheong]]"
bar:ongtengcheong from: 01/07/1978 till: $cb7 color:cabinet
bar:ongtengcheong from: 01/07/1978 till: $cb7 color:cabinet
bar:ongtengcheong from: $cb7 till: 16/08/1993 color:dpm
bar:ongtengcheong from: $cb7 till: 16/08/1993 color:dpm


bar:ahmadmattar from: $ge7 till: $ge13 color:mp text:"[[Ahmad Mattar]]"
bar:ahmadmattar from: $ge7 till: $ge13 color:mp text:"[[Ahmad Mattar]]"
bar:ahmadmattar from: 01/06/1984 till: 30/06/1993 color:cabinet
bar:ahmadmattar from: 01/06/1984 till: 30/06/1993 color:cabinet


bar:gohchoktong from: $ge8 till: $ge18 color:mp text:"[[Goh Chok Tong]]"
bar:gohchoktong from: $ge8 till: $ge18 color:mp text:"[[Goh Chok Tong]]"
bar:gohchoktong from: 15/03/1979 till: 01/06/1982 color:cabinet
bar:gohchoktong from: 15/03/1979 till: 01/06/1982 color:cabinet
bar:gohchoktong from: 01/06/1982 till: $cb7 color:mindef
bar:gohchoktong from: 01/06/1982 till: $cb7 color:mindef
bar:gohchoktong from: $cb7 till: $cb9 color:dpm
bar:gohchoktong from: $cb7 till: $cb9 color:dpm
bar:gohchoktong from: $cb9 till: $cb13 color:pm
bar:gohchoktong from: $cb9 till: $cb13 color:pm
bar:gohchoktong from: $cb13 till: $cb15 color:sm
bar:gohchoktong from: $cb13 till: $cb15 color:sm


bar:sdhanabalan from: $ge8 till: $ge13 color:mp text:"[[S. Dhanabalan]]"
bar:sdhanabalan from: $ge8 till: $ge13 color:mp text:"[[S. Dhanabalan]]"
bar:sdhanabalan from: 01/06/1980 till: $cb8 color:mfa
bar:sdhanabalan from: 01/06/1980 till: $cb8 color:mfa
bar:sdhanabalan from: $cb8 till: 01/01/1993 color:cabinet
bar:sdhanabalan from: $cb8 till: 01/01/1993 color:cabinet


bar:limcheeonn from: $ge8 till: $be92 color:mp text:"[[Lim Chee Onn]]"
bar:limcheeonn from: $ge8 till: $be92 color:mp text:"[[Lim Chee Onn]]"
bar:limcheeonn from: 15/09/1980 till: 01/08/1983 color:cabinet
bar:limcheeonn from: 15/09/1980 till: 01/08/1983 color:cabinet


bar:howeyoonchong from: $be79 till: $ge10 color:mp
bar:howeyoonchong from: $be79 till: $ge10 color:mp
bar:howeyoonchong from: 12/02/1979 till: 01/06/1982 color:mindef
bar:howeyoonchong from: 12/02/1979 till: 01/06/1982 color:mindef
bar:howeyoonchong from: 01/06/1982 till: $cb7 color: cabinet text:"[[Howe Yoon Chong]]"
bar:howeyoonchong from: 01/06/1982 till: $cb7 color: cabinet text:"[[Howe Yoon Chong]]"


Line 540: Line 548:
bar:tonytan from: 24/10/1983 till: $cb7 color:mof
bar:tonytan from: 24/10/1983 till: $cb7 color:mof
bar:tonytan from: $cb7 till: 31/08/1991 color:moe
bar:tonytan from: $cb7 till: 31/08/1991 color:moe
bar:tonytan from: 01/08/1995 till: 01/09/2005 color:dpm
bar:tonytan from: 01/08/1995 till: 01/09/2005 color:dpm


bar:tehcheangwan from: $be79 till: 14/12/1986 color:mp
bar:tehcheangwan from: $be79 till: 14/12/1986 color:mp
Line 554: Line 562:
bar:yeoninghong from: $ge9 till: 01/07/1994 color:mp text:"[[Yeo Ning Hong]]"
bar:yeoninghong from: $ge9 till: 01/07/1994 color:mp text:"[[Yeo Ning Hong]]"
bar:yeoninghong from: 01/06/1984 till: 01/07/1991 color:cabinet
bar:yeoninghong from: 01/06/1984 till: 01/07/1991 color:cabinet
bar:yeoninghong from: 01/07/1991 till: 01/07/1994 color:mindef
bar:yeoninghong from: 01/07/1991 till: 01/07/1994 color:mindef


bar:leeyocksuan from: $ge9 till: $ge15 color:mp text:"[[Lee Yock Suan]]"
bar:leeyocksuan from: $ge9 till: $ge15 color:mp text:"[[Lee Yock Suan]]"
bar:leeyocksuan from: 01/01/1987 till: 02/01/1992 color:cabinet
bar:leeyocksuan from: 01/01/1987 till: 02/01/1992 color:cabinet
bar:leeyocksuan from: 02/01/1992 till: $cb11 color:moe
bar:leeyocksuan from: 02/01/1992 till: $cb11 color:moe
bar:leeyocksuan from: $cb11 till: $cb13 color:cabinet
bar:leeyocksuan from: $cb11 till: $cb13 color:cabinet


bar:limboonheng from: $ge9 till: $ge16 color:mp text:"[[Lim Boon Heng]]"
bar:limboonheng from: $ge9 till: $ge16 color:mp text:"[[Lim Boon Heng]]"
bar:limboonheng from: 11/10/1993 till: $cb15 color:cabinet
bar:limboonheng from: 11/10/1993 till: $cb15 color:cabinet


bar:richardhu from: $ge10 till: $ge14 color:mp text:"[[Richard Hu]]"
bar:richardhu from: $ge10 till: $ge14 color:mp text:"[[Richard Hu]]"
bar:richardhu from: $cb7 till: 07/05/1985 color:cabinet
bar:richardhu from: $cb7 till: 07/05/1985 color:cabinet
bar:richardhu from: 07/05/1985 till: 09/11/2001 color:mof
bar:richardhu from: 07/05/1985 till: 09/11/2001 color:mof


bar:leehsienloong from: $ge10 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Lee Hsien Loong]]"
bar:leehsienloong from: $ge10 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Lee Hsien Loong]]"
bar:leehsienloong from: 01/01/1987 till: $cb9 color:cabinet
bar:leehsienloong from: 01/01/1987 till: $cb9 color:cabinet
bar:leehsienloong from: $cb9 till: $cb13 color:dpm
bar:leehsienloong from: $cb9 till: $cb13 color:dpm
bar:leehsienloong from: $cb13 till: $now color:pm
bar:leehsienloong from: $cb13 till: $cb18 color:pm
bar:leehsienloong from: $cb18 till: $now color:sm


bar:wongkanseng from: $ge10 till: $ge17 color:mp text:"[[Wong Kan Seng]]"
bar:wongkanseng from: $ge10 till: $ge17 color:mp text:"[[Wong Kan Seng]]"
bar:wongkanseng from: 01/01/1987 till: $cb8 color:cabinet
bar:wongkanseng from: 01/01/1987 till: $cb8 color:cabinet
bar:wongkanseng from: $cb8 till: 02/01/1994 color:mfa
bar:wongkanseng from: $cb8 till: 02/01/1994 color:mfa
bar:wongkanseng from: 02/01/1994 till: 01/09/2005 color:mha
bar:wongkanseng from: 02/01/1994 till: 01/09/2005 color:mha
bar:wongkanseng from: 01/09/2005 till: $cb15 color:dpm
bar:wongkanseng from: 01/09/2005 till: $cb15 color:dpm

bar:yeocheowtong from: $ge10 till: $ge16 color:mp text:"[[Yeo Cheow Tong]]"
bar:yeocheowtong from: $ge10 till: $ge16 color:mp text:"[[Yeo Cheow Tong]]"
bar:yeocheowtong from: $cb9 till: 29/06/2006 color:cabinet
bar:yeocheowtong from: $cb9 till: 29/06/2006 color:cabinet


bar:leeboonyang from: $ge10 till: $ge16 color:mp text:"[[Lee Boon Yang]]"
bar:leeboonyang from: $ge10 till: $ge16 color:mp text:"[[Lee Boon Yang]]"
bar:leeboonyang from: 01/07/1991 till: 02/07/1994 color:cabinet
bar:leeboonyang from: 01/07/1991 till: 02/07/1994 color:cabinet
bar:leeboonyang from: 02/07/1994 till: 01/08/1995 color:mindef
bar:leeboonyang from: 02/07/1994 till: 01/08/1995 color:mindef
bar:leeboonyang from: 01/08/1995 till: 01/04/2009 color:cabinet
bar:leeboonyang from: 01/08/1995 till: 01/04/2009 color:cabinet


bar:abdullahtarmugi from: $ge10 till: $ge16 color:mp text:"[[Abdullah Tarmugi]]"
bar:abdullahtarmugi from: $ge10 till: $ge16 color:mp text:"[[Abdullah Tarmugi]]"
bar:abdullahtarmugi from: 30/06/1993 till: 24/03/2002 color:cabinet
bar:abdullahtarmugi from: 30/06/1993 till: 24/03/2002 color:cabinet


bar:georgeyeo from: $ge11 till: $ge16 color:mp text:"[[George Yeo]]"
bar:georgeyeo from: $ge11 till: $ge16 color:mp text:"[[George Yeo]]"
bar:georgeyeo from: 01/07/1991 till: $cb13 color:cabinet
bar:georgeyeo from: 01/07/1991 till: $cb13 color:cabinet
bar:georgeyeo from: $cb13 till: $cb15 color:mfa
bar:georgeyeo from: $cb13 till: $cb15 color:mfa


bar:kshanmugam from: $ge11 till: $now color:mp text:"[[K. Shanmugam]]"
bar:kshanmugam from: $ge11 till: $now color:mp text:"[[K. Shanmugam]]"
Line 598: Line 607:
bar:kshanmugam from: 01/11/2010 till: $cb15 color:mha
bar:kshanmugam from: 01/11/2010 till: $cb15 color:mha
bar:kshanmugam from: $cb15 till: $cb16 color:mfa
bar:kshanmugam from: $cb15 till: $cb16 color:mfa
bar:kshanmugam from: $cb16 till: $now color:mha
bar:kshanmugam from: $cb16 till: $now color:mha


bar:mahbowtan from: $ge11 till: $ge17 color:mp text:"[[Mah Bow Tan]]"
bar:mahbowtan from: $ge11 till: $ge17 color:mp text:"[[Mah Bow Tan]]"
bar:mahbowtan from: $cb10 till: $cb15 color:cabinet
bar:mahbowtan from: $cb10 till: $cb15 color:cabinet


bar:limhngkiang from: $ge12 till: $ge18 color:mp text:"[[Lim Hng Kiang]]"
bar:limhngkiang from: $ge12 till: $ge18 color:mp text:"[[Lim Hng Kiang]]"
bar:limhngkiang from: 17/04/1995 till: 30/04/2018 color:cabinet
bar:limhngkiang from: 17/04/1995 till: 30/04/2018 color:cabinet


bar:teocheehean from: $be92 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Teo Chee Hean]]"
bar:teocheehean from: $be92 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Teo Chee Hean]]"
Line 611: Line 620:
bar:teocheehean from: 01/08/2003 till: 01/04/2009 color:mindef
bar:teocheehean from: 01/08/2003 till: 01/04/2009 color:mindef
bar:teocheehean from: 01/04/2009 till: 01/04/2019 color:dpm
bar:teocheehean from: 01/04/2009 till: 01/04/2019 color:dpm
bar:teocheehean from: 01/04/2019 till: $now color:sm
bar:teocheehean from: 01/04/2019 till: $now color:sm


bar:limsweesay from: $ge13 till: $ge18 color:mp text:"[[Lim Swee Say]]"
bar:limsweesay from: $ge13 till: $ge18 color:mp text:"[[Lim Swee Say]]"
bar:limsweesay from: $cb12 till: 30/04/2018 color:cabinet
bar:limsweesay from: $cb12 till: 30/04/2018 color:cabinet


bar:yaacobibrahim from: $ge13 till: $ge18 color:mp text:"[[Yaacob Ibrahim]]"
bar:yaacobibrahim from: $ge13 till: $ge18 color:mp text:"[[Yaacob Ibrahim]]"
bar:yaacobibrahim from: 25/03/2002 till: 30/04/2018 color:cabinet
bar:yaacobibrahim from: 25/03/2002 till: 30/04/2018 color:cabinet


bar:limhweehua from: $ge13 till: $ge16 color:mp
bar:limhweehua from: $ge13 till: $ge16 color:mp
bar:limhweehua from: 01/04/2009 till: $cb15 color:cabinet text:"[[Lim Hwee Hua]]"
bar:limhweehua from: 01/04/2009 till: $cb15 color:cabinet text:"[[Lim Hwee Hua]]"


bar:siswaran from: $ge13 till: $now color:mp text:"[[S. Iswaran]]"
bar:siswaran from: $ge13 till: 18/01/2024 color:mp text:"[[S. Iswaran]]"
bar:siswaran from: $cb15 till: $now color:cabinet
bar:siswaran from: $cb15 till: 18/01/2024 color:cabinet


bar:tharmanshanmugaratnam from: $ge14 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Tharman Shanmugaratnam]]"
bar:tharmanshanmugaratnam from: $ge14 till: 07/07/2023 color:mp text:"[[Tharman Shanmugaratnam]]"
bar:tharmanshanmugaratnam from: 01/08/2003 till: 01/12/2007 color:moe
bar:tharmanshanmugaratnam from: 01/08/2003 till: 01/12/2007 color:moe
bar:tharmanshanmugaratnam from: 01/12/2007 till: $cb15 color:mof
bar:tharmanshanmugaratnam from: 01/12/2007 till: $cb15 color:mof
bar:tharmanshanmugaratnam from: $cb15 till: 01/05/2019 color:dpm
bar:tharmanshanmugaratnam from: $cb15 till: 01/05/2019 color:dpm
bar:tharmanshanmugaratnam from: 01/05/2019 till: $now color:sm
bar:tharmanshanmugaratnam from: 01/05/2019 till: 07/07/2023 color:sm


bar:ngenghen from: $ge14 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Ng Eng Hen]]"
bar:ngenghen from: $ge14 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Ng Eng Hen]]"
bar:ngenghen from: $cb13 till: 01/04/2008 color:cabinet
bar:ngenghen from: $cb13 till: 01/04/2008 color:cabinet
bar:ngenghen from: 01/04/2008 till: $cb15 color:moe
bar:ngenghen from: 01/04/2008 till: $cb15 color:moe
bar:ngenghen from: $cb15 till: $now color:mindef
bar:ngenghen from: $cb15 till: $now color:mindef


bar:vivianbalakrishnan from: $ge14 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Vivian Balakrishnan]]"
bar:vivianbalakrishnan from: $ge14 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Vivian Balakrishnan]]"
bar:vivianbalakrishnan from: $cb13 till: $cb16 color:cabinet
bar:vivianbalakrishnan from: $cb13 till: $cb16 color:cabinet
bar:vivianbalakrishnan from: $cb16 till: $now color:mfa
bar:vivianbalakrishnan from: $cb16 till: $now color:mfa


bar:khawboonwan from: $ge14 till: $ge18 color:mp
bar:khawboonwan from: $ge14 till: $ge18 color:mp
bar:khawboonwan from: $cb13 till: $cb17 color:cabinet text:"[[Khaw Boon Wan]]"
bar:khawboonwan from: $cb13 till: $cb17 color:cabinet text:"[[Khaw Boon Wan]]"


bar:raymondlim from: $ge14 till: $ge17 color:mp text:"[[Raymond Lim]]"
bar:raymondlim from: $ge14 till: $ge17 color:mp text:"[[Raymond Lim]]"
bar:raymondlim from: $cb13 till: $cb15 color:cabinet
bar:raymondlim from: $cb13 till: $cb15 color:cabinet


bar:gankimyong from: $ge14 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Gan Kim Yong]]"
bar:gankimyong from: $ge14 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Gan Kim Yong]]"
bar:gankimyong from: 01/04/2009 till: $now color:cabinet
bar:gankimyong from: 01/04/2009 till: $cb18 color:cabinet
bar:gankimyong from: $cb18 till: $now color:dpm


bar:indraneerajah from: $ge14 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Indranee Rajah]]"
bar:indraneerajah from: $ge14 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Indranee Rajah]]"
bar:indraneerajah from: 01/05/2018 till: $now color:cabinet
bar:indraneerajah from: 01/05/2018 till: $now color:cabinet


bar:malikiosman from: $ge14 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Maliki Osman]]"
bar:malikiosman from: $ge14 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Maliki Osman]]"
bar:malikiosman from: $cb17 till: $now color:cabinet
bar:malikiosman from: $cb17 till: $now color:cabinet


bar:luituckyew from: $ge15 till: $ge17 color:mp
bar:luituckyew from: $ge15 till: $ge17 color:mp
bar:luituckyew from: 01/11/2010 till: $cb16 color:cabinet text:"[[Lui Tuck Yew]]"
bar:luituckyew from: 01/11/2010 till: $cb16 color:cabinet text:"[[Lui Tuck Yew]]"


bar:gracefu from: $ge15 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Grace Fu]]"
bar:gracefu from: $ge15 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Grace Fu]]"
bar:gracefu from: 01/08/2012 till: $now color:cabinet
bar:gracefu from: 01/08/2012 till: $now color:cabinet


bar:masagoszulkifli from: $ge15 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Masagos Zulkifli]]"
bar:masagoszulkifli from: $ge15 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Masagos Zulkifli]]"
bar:masagoszulkifli from: 09/04/2015 till: $now color:cabinet
bar:masagoszulkifli from: 09/04/2015 till: $now color:cabinet


bar:josephineteo from: $ge15 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Josephine Teo]]"
bar:josephineteo from: $ge15 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Josephine Teo]]"
bar:josephineteo from: 01/05/2017 till: $now color:cabinet
bar:josephineteo from: 01/05/2017 till: $now color:cabinet


bar:hengsweekeat from: $ge16 till: $now color:mp
bar:hengsweekeat from: $ge16 till: $now color:mp
Line 676: Line 686:
bar:lawrencewong from: $cb17 till: 15/05/2021 color:moe
bar:lawrencewong from: $cb17 till: 15/05/2021 color:moe
bar:lawrencewong from: 15/05/2021 till: 13/06/2022 color:mof
bar:lawrencewong from: 15/05/2021 till: 13/06/2022 color:mof
bar:lawrencewong from: 13/06/2022 till: $now color:dpm
bar:lawrencewong from: 13/06/2022 till: $cb18 color:dpm
bar:lawrencewong from: $cb18 till: $now color:pm


bar:chanchunsing from: $ge16 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Chan Chun Sing]]"
bar:chanchunsing from: $ge16 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Chan Chun Sing]]"
bar:chanchunsing from: 01/09/2013 till: 15/05/2021 color:cabinet
bar:chanchunsing from: 01/09/2013 till: 15/05/2021 color:cabinet
bar:chanchunsing from: 15/05/2021 till: $now color:moe
bar:chanchunsing from: 15/05/2021 till: $now color:moe


bar:tanchuanjin from: $ge16 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Tan Chuan-Jin]]"
bar:tanchuanjin from: $ge16 till: 17/07/2023 color:mp text:"[[Tan Chuan-Jin]]"
bar:tanchuanjin from: 01/05/2014 till: 10/09/2017 color:cabinet
bar:tanchuanjin from: 01/05/2014 till: 10/09/2017 color:cabinet


bar:desmondlee from: $ge16 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Desmond Lee (Singaporean politician)|Desmond Lee]]"
bar:desmondlee from: $ge16 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Desmond Lee (Singaporean politician)|Desmond Lee]]"
bar:desmondlee from: 01/05/2017 till: $now color:cabinet
bar:desmondlee from: 01/05/2017 till: $now color:cabinet


bar:edwintong from: $ge16 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Edwin Tong]]"
bar:edwintong from: $ge16 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Edwin Tong]]"
bar:edwintong from: $cb17 till: $now color:cabinet
bar:edwintong from: $cb17 till: $now color:cabinet


bar:ongyekung from: $ge17 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Ong Ye Kung]]"
bar:ongyekung from: $ge17 till: $now color:mp text:"[[Ong Ye Kung]]"
bar:ongyekung from: 01/11/2016 till: $cb17 color:moe
bar:ongyekung from: 01/11/2016 till: $cb17 color:moe
bar:ongyekung from: $cb17 till: $now color:cabinet
bar:ongyekung from: $cb17 till: $now color:cabinet


bar:ngcheemeng from: $ge17 till: 01/11/2016 color:mp
bar:ngcheemeng from: $ge17 till: 01/11/2016 color:mp
bar:ngcheemeng from: 01/11/2016 till: 30/04/2018 color:moe text:"[[Ng Chee Meng]]"
bar:ngcheemeng from: 01/11/2016 till: 30/04/2018 color:moe
bar:ngcheemeng from: 30/04/2018 till: 26/07/2020 color:cabinet text:"[[Ng Chee Meng]]"

bar:cheehongtat from: $ge17 till: $now color:mp
bar:cheehongtat from: 18/01/2024 till: $now color:cabinet text:"[[Chee Hong Tat]]"


bar:tanseeleng from: $ge18 till: $cb17 color:mp
bar:tanseeleng from: $ge18 till: $cb17 color:mp
Line 706: Line 721:
*[[Government of Singapore]]
*[[Government of Singapore]]
*[[Parliament of Singapore]]
*[[Parliament of Singapore]]

==Notes==
{{notelist}}


== References ==
== References ==
=== Citations ===
=== Citations ===
{{Reflist|35em}}
{{reflist}}


=== Sources ===
=== Sources ===
{{refbegin}}
{{refbegin}}
* {{citation |last = Chia |first = Sue-Ann |title = Teo Chee Hean named Deputy Prime Minister |url = http://www.pmo.gov.sg/News/PressReleases/News+articles+on+cabinet+changes+and+other+appointments.htm |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090510025733/http://www.pmo.gov.sg/News/PressReleases/News+articles+on+cabinet+changes+and+other+appointments.htm |archive-date = 10 May 2009 |newspaper=[[The Straits Times]] (reproduced on the website of the Prime Minister's Office) |date=27 March 2009 |page=A1 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all |access-date=24 April 2009 }}.
* {{citation |last = Chia |first = Sue-Ann |title = Teo Chee Hean named Deputy Prime Minister |url=http://www.pmo.gov.sg/News/PressReleases/News+articles+on+cabinet+changes+and+other+appointments.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090510025733/http://www.pmo.gov.sg/News/PressReleases/News+articles+on+cabinet+changes+and+other+appointments.htm |archive-date = 10 May 2009 |newspaper=[[The Straits Times]] (reproduced on the website of the Prime Minister's Office) |date=27 March 2009 |page=A1 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all |access-date=24 April 2009 }}.
* {{Singapore legislation |title=Constitution|ed=1985|rep=1999}}.
* {{Singapore legislation |title=Constitution|ed=1985|rep=1999}}.
* {{citation |last = Lau |first = Wah Ming, Secretary to the Cabinet |title = Code of Conduct for Ministers |url = http://www.getformesingapore.com/previous2005/020805_codeofconductforministers.htm |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080612064850/http://www.getformesingapore.com/previous2005/020805_codeofconductforministers.htm |archive-date=12 June 2008 |publisher=Cabinet of Singapore (reproduced on the Getforme Singapore website) |date = 4 July 2005 |access-date=26 April 2009 }}.
* {{citation |last = Lau |first = Wah Ming, Secretary to the Cabinet |title = Code of Conduct for Ministers |url=http://www.getformesingapore.com/previous2005/020805_codeofconductforministers.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080612064850/http://www.getformesingapore.com/previous2005/020805_codeofconductforministers.htm |archive-date=12 June 2008 |publisher=Cabinet of Singapore (reproduced on the Getforme Singapore website) |date = 4 July 2005 |access-date=26 April 2009 }}.
* {{citation |last=Loh |first=Chee Kong |title = A team for new challenges |url = http://www.todayonline.com/articles/309963.asp |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090329114041/http://www.todayonline.com/articles/309963.asp |archive-date=29 March 2009 |newspaper=[[Today (Singapore newspaper)|Today]] |date = 27 March 2009 |pages = 1, 3 |url-status=dead |df=dmy }}.
* {{citation |last=Loh |first=Chee Kong |title = A team for new challenges |url=http://www.todayonline.com/articles/309963.asp |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090329114041/http://www.todayonline.com/articles/309963.asp |archive-date=29 March 2009 |newspaper=[[Today (Singapore newspaper)|Today]] |date = 27 March 2009 |pages = 1, 3 |url-status=dead |df=dmy }}.
* {{Singapore legislation|title=Parliamentary Pensions Act|cap=219|ed=1996}}.
* {{Singapore legislation|title=Parliamentary Pensions Act|cap=219|ed=1996}}.
* {{citation |title = Salaries for a Capable and Committed Government |url = http://reviewcommittee2011.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/salaries-for-a-capable-and-committed-govt.pdf |format=PDF |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120104154450/http://reviewcommittee2011.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/salaries-for-a-capable-and-committed-govt.pdf |archive-date=4 January 2012 |location=Singapore |publisher=Committee to Review Ministerial Salaries |date=30 December 2011 |url-status=dead |df=dmy }}.
* {{citation |title = Salaries for a Capable and Committed Government |url=http://reviewcommittee2011.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/salaries-for-a-capable-and-committed-govt.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120104154450/http://reviewcommittee2011.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/salaries-for-a-capable-and-committed-govt.pdf |archive-date=4 January 2012 |location=Singapore |publisher=Committee to Review Ministerial Salaries |date=30 December 2011 |url-status=dead |df=dmy }}.
*{{citation |last=Tan|first=Kevin Yew Lee|chapter=A Short Legal and Constitutional History of Singapore|editor-last=Tan|editor-first=Kevin Y. L. |title=The Singapore Legal System|edition=2nd|location=Singapore|publisher=[[National University of Singapore|Singapore University Press]]|year=1999|pages=26–66|isbn=978-9971-69-213-1}}.
*{{citation |last=Tan|first=Kevin Yew Lee|chapter=A Short Legal and Constitutional History of Singapore|editor-last=Tan|editor-first=Kevin Y. L. |title=The Singapore Legal System|edition=2nd|location=Singapore|publisher=[[National University of Singapore|Singapore University Press]]|year=1999|pages=26–66|isbn=978-9971-69-213-1}}.
*{{citation|last=Thio|first=Li-ann|author-link=Thio Li-ann|chapter=The Constitutional Framework of Powers|editor-last=Tan|editor-first=Kevin Y. L. |title=The Singapore Legal System|edition=2nd|location=Singapore|publisher=Singapore University Press|year=1999|pages=67–122|isbn=978-9971-69-213-1}}.
*{{citation|last=Thio|first=Li-ann|author-link=Thio Li-ann|chapter=The Constitutional Framework of Powers|editor-last=Tan|editor-first=Kevin Y. L. |title=The Singapore Legal System|edition=2nd|location=Singapore|publisher=Singapore University Press|year=1999|pages=67–122|isbn=978-9971-69-213-1}}.
Line 728: Line 746:
*{{citation|last=Chan|first=Helena H[ui-]M[eng]|chapter=The Executive|title=The Legal System of Singapore|location=Singapore|publisher=[[LexisNexis Butterworths|Butterworths Asia]]|year=1995|pages=22–29|isbn=978-0-409-99789-7}}.
*{{citation|last=Chan|first=Helena H[ui-]M[eng]|chapter=The Executive|title=The Legal System of Singapore|location=Singapore|publisher=[[LexisNexis Butterworths|Butterworths Asia]]|year=1995|pages=22–29|isbn=978-0-409-99789-7}}.
*{{citation|last=Jennings|first=Ivor|author-link=Ivor Jennings|title=Cabinet Government|edition=3rd|location=Cambridge|publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]|year=1980|isbn=978-0-521-09570-9}}.
*{{citation|last=Jennings|first=Ivor|author-link=Ivor Jennings|title=Cabinet Government|edition=3rd|location=Cambridge|publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]|year=1980|isbn=978-0-521-09570-9}}.
*{{citation|last=Quah |first=John S.T. |chapter=Paying for the 'Best and Brightest': Reward for High Public Office in Singapore |url=http://www.jonstquah.com/documents/QuahJon-2003.pdf |format=PDF |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110713120021/http://www.jonstquah.com/documents/QuahJon-2003.pdf |archive-date=13 July 2011 |editor-last=Hood |editor-first=Christopher |editor-link=Christopher Hood |editor2-last=Peters |editor2-first=B. Guy |editor3-last=Lee |editor3-first=Grace O.M. |title=Reward for High Public Office: Asian and Pacific Rim States [Routledge research in comparative politics; 3] |location=London |publisher=[[Routledge]] |year=2003 |pages=145–162 |isbn=978-0-415-30349-1 |url-status=dead |df=dmy }}.
*{{citation|last=Quah |first=John S.T. |chapter=Paying for the 'Best and Brightest': Reward for High Public Office in Singapore |chapter-url=http://www.jonstquah.com/documents/QuahJon-2003.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110713120021/http://www.jonstquah.com/documents/QuahJon-2003.pdf |archive-date=13 July 2011 |editor-last=Hood |editor-first=Christopher |editor-link=Christopher Hood |editor2-last=Peters |editor2-first=B. Guy |editor3-last=Lee |editor3-first=Grace O.M. |title=Reward for High Public Office: Asian and Pacific Rim States [Routledge research in comparative politics; 3] |location=London |publisher=[[Routledge]] |year=2003 |pages=145–162 |isbn=978-0-415-30349-1 |url-status=dead |df=dmy }}.
*{{citation|last=Tan|first=Kevin Y L|last2=Thio|first2=Li-ann|chapter=The Executive|title=Tan, Yeo & Lee's Constitutional Law in Malaysia and Singapore|edition=2nd|location=Singapore|publisher=Butterworths Asia|year=1997|pages=181–243|isbn=978-0-409-99908-2}}.
*{{citation|last1=Tan|first1=Kevin Y L|last2=Thio|first2=Li-ann|chapter=The Executive|title=Tan, Yeo & Lee's Constitutional Law in Malaysia and Singapore|edition=2nd|location=Singapore|publisher=Butterworths Asia|year=1997|pages=181–243|isbn=978-0-409-99908-2}}.
*{{citation |last=Thio |first=Li-ann |chapter=Government and the State |url=https://archive.org/details/criminaljusticei0000grif |format=PDF |title=ASEAN Legal Systems |location=Singapore |publisher=Butterworths Asia for the [[Association of Southeast Asian Nations|ASEAN]] Law Association |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-409-99802-3 |df=dmy |url-access=registration }}.
*{{citation |last=Thio |first=Li-ann |chapter=Government and the State |url=https://archive.org/details/criminaljusticei0000grif |format=PDF |title=ASEAN Legal Systems |location=Singapore |publisher=Butterworths Asia for the [[Association of Southeast Asian Nations|ASEAN]] Law Association |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-409-99802-3 |df=dmy |url-access=registration }}.


Line 749: Line 767:
{{Asia topic|Cabinet of|title=National cabinets of Asia}}
{{Asia topic|Cabinet of|title=National cabinets of Asia}}


{{Good article}}
{{Use British English Oxford spelling|date=July 2013}}


[[Category:Executive branch of the government of Singapore]]
[[Category:Executive branch of the government of Singapore]]

Latest revision as of 00:26, 2 October 2024

Cabinet of Singapore
Current: First Lawrence Wong Cabinet
Cabinet overview
Formed5 June 1959; 65 years ago (1959-06-05)
TypeDecision making
JurisdictionGovernment of Singapore
HeadquartersSingapore
Cabinet executives
Websitewww.pmo.gov.sg
Agency IDT08GA0009J

The Cabinet of Singapore forms the executive branch of the Government of Singapore together with the president. It is led by the prime minister who is the head of government. The prime minister is a Member of Parliament (MP) appointed by the president who in the president's judgment is likely to command the confidence of the majority of the Members of Parliament (MPs). The other ministers in the Cabinet are Members of Parliament appointed by the president acting in accordance with the advice of the prime minister. Ministers are prohibited from holding any office of profit and from actively engaging in any commercial enterprise.

The Cabinet has the general direction and control of the Government and is collectively responsible to Parliament. It also has significant influence over lawmaking. Ministers may be designated by the prime minister to be in charge of particular ministries, or as ministers in the Prime Minister's Office. Singapore's ministers are the highest paid in the world. Prior to a salary review in 2011, the prime minister's annual salary was S$3.07 million, while the pay of ministerial-level officers ranged between S$1.58 million and S$2.37 million.[1] On 21 May 2011, a committee was appointed by the prime minister to review the salaries of the prime minister as well as the president, political appointment holders, and Members of Parliament.[2] Following the recommended wage reductions by the committee which were then debated and subsequently accepted in Parliament, the prime minister's salary was reduced by 36% (includes the removal of his pension) to S$2.2 million.[1] Nonetheless, the prime minister remains the highest-paid political leader in the world.[3]

The earliest predecessor of the Cabinet was the Executive Council of the Straits Settlements, introduced in 1877 to advise the governor of the Straits Settlements. It wielded no executive power. In 1955, a Council of Ministers was created, made up of three ex officio Official Members and six Elected Members of the Legislative Assembly of Singapore, appointed by the governor on the recommendation of the leader of the house. Following the general elections that year, David Saul Marshall became the first Chief Minister of Singapore. Constitutional talks between Legislative Assembly representatives and the Colonial Office were held from 1956 to 1958, and Singapore gained full internal self-government in 1959. The governor was replaced by the Yang di-Pertuan Negara, who had power to appoint to the post of prime minister the person most likely to command the authority of the Assembly, and other ministers of the Cabinet on the prime minister's advice. In the 1959 general elections, the People's Action Party (PAP) swept to power with 43 out of the 51 seats in the Assembly, and Lee Kuan Yew became the first prime minister of Singapore. The executive branch of the Government of Singapore remained unchanged following Singapore's merger with Malaysia in 1963, and subsequent independence in 1965.

Following the 2020 general election, a Cabinet reshuffle took place on 27 July 2020 for the "4G" leaders to experience different ministries with 37 political office holders, the same number as the previous Cabinet. Heng Swee Keat was assigned an additional role as Coordinating Minister for Economic Policies while maintaining his other appointments as Minister for Finance and deputy prime minister.

Gan Kim Yong, Ong Ye Kung, Josephine Teo, Lawrence Wong, S. Iswaran and Chan Chun Sing were reshuffled into new portfolios as minister. Tan See Leng was appointed as Minister for Manpower after Heng Swee Keat ruled himself out as the PAP's 4G leader and the next prime minister. While Lee Hsien Loong, Teo Chee Hean, Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Ng Eng Hen, Vivian Balakrishnan, Grace Fu and K. Shanmugam retained their portfolios with no new appointments. Indranee Rajah was also reshuffled into a new ministry as second minister while maintaining her role as minister in the Prime Minister's Office as of 15 May 2021.

Maliki Osman and Edwin Tong were both promoted to a minister position. Tan See Leng was newly appointed into the cabinet as both a minister and second minister.[4]

On 6 June 2022, then prime minister Lee Hsien Loong announced his new Cabinet line-up and other political appointments on 6 June 2022. These changes took effect from 13 June 2022. Lawrence Wong was promoted to deputy prime minister and was appointed the acting prime minister in the absence of the prime minister and will continue as Minister for Finance. Lee Hsien Loong resigned from the office of the prime minister in 15 May 2024, and Lawrence Wong succeeded him as the 4th prime minister.

On 18 January 2024, S. Iswaran was charged in the State Courts of Singapore with 27 charges relating to bribery and corruption and S. Iswaran resigned. Lee Hsien Loong appointed Chee Hong Tat as the new Minister of Transport.

History

[edit]

Up to the outbreak of World War II, Singapore was part of the Crown colony known as the Straits Settlements together with Malacca and Penang. The earliest predecessor of the Cabinet was arguably the Executive Council of the Straits Settlements that was introduced in 1877 by letters patent issued by the Crown,[5] though its function was very different from that of today's Cabinet. The council, which was composed of "such persons and constituted in such manner as may be directed" by royal instructions,[6] existed to advise the Governor of the Straits Settlements and wielded no executive power (including the Colonial Secretary). The Governor was required to consult the Executive Council on all affairs of importance unless they were too urgent to be laid before it, or if reference to it would prejudice the public service. In such urgent cases, the Governor had to inform the Council of the measures he had taken.[7][8]

Sir William Cleaver Francis Robinson (1834–1897), the Governor of the Straits Settlements when the Executive Council of the Straits Settlements was introduced in 1877

Following the Second World War, the Straits Settlements were disbanded and Singapore became a Crown colony in its own right.[9] The reconstituted Executive Council consisted of six officials and four nominated "unofficials".[10] In February 1954, the Rendel Constitutional Commission under the chairmanship of Sir George William Rendel, which had been appointed to comprehensively review the constitution of the Colony of Singapore, rendered its report. Among other things, it recommended that a Council of Ministers be created, composed of three ex officio Official Members and six Elected Members of the Legislative Assembly of Singapore appointed by the Governor on the recommendation of the Leader of the House, who would be the leader of the largest political party or coalition of parties having majority support in the legislature. The recommendation was implemented in 1955.[11] In the general election held that year, the Labour Front took a majority of the seats in the Assembly, and David Saul Marshall became the first Chief Minister of Singapore. Major problems with the Rendel Constitution were that the Chief Minister and ministers' powers were ill-defined, and that the Official Members retained control of the finance, administration, and internal security and law portfolios. This led to confrontation between Marshall, who saw himself as a prime minister governing the country, and the Governor, Sir John Fearns Nicoll, who felt that important decisions and policies should remain with himself and the Official Members.[12][13]

Lee Kuan Yew, who was elected the first prime minister of Singapore in 1959, in a 2005 photograph

In 1956, members of the Legislative Assembly held constitutional talks with the Colonial Office in London. The talks broke down as Marshall did not agree to the British Government's proposal for the casting vote on a proposed Defence Council to be held by the British High Commissioner to Singapore, who would only exercise it in an emergency. Marshall resigned as Chief Minister in June 1956, and was replaced by Lim Yew Hock.[14] The following year, Lim led another delegation to the UK for further talks on self-government. This time, agreement was reached on the composition of an Internal Security Council.[15] Other constitutional arrangements were swiftly settled in 1958, and on 1 August the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed the State of Singapore Act 1958 (6 & 7 Eliz. 2. c. 59 (UK)) granting the colony full internal self-government. Under Singapore's new constitution which came into force on 3 June 1959,[16] the Governor was replaced by the Yang di-Pertuan Negara (Head of State), who had power to appoint as prime minister the person most likely to command the authority of the Legislative Assembly, and other ministers of the Cabinet on the prime minister's advice.[17] The Constitution also created the post of the British High Commissioner,[18] who was entitled to receive the agenda of each Cabinet meeting and to see all Cabinet papers. In the 1959 general elections, the People's Action Party (PAP) swept to power with 43 out of the 51 seats in the Assembly, and Lee Kuan Yew became the first prime minister of Singapore. Nine other ministers were appointed to the Cabinet.[19]

The British High Commissioner's role became that of an ambassador following Singapore's independence from Britain and merger with Malaysia in 1963. Apart from that the executive branch of the Singapore Government remained largely unchanged,[20] although now it governed a state within a larger federation. However, with effect from 9 August 1965, Singapore left the Federation of Malaysia and became a fully independent republic. On separation from Malaysia, the Singapore Government retained its executive authority, and the executive authority of the Parliament of Malaysia ceased to extend to Singapore and vested in the Singapore Government.[21] The Yang di-Pertuan Agong, the Supreme Head of State of Malaysia, also ceased to be the Supreme Head of Singapore and relinquished his sovereignty, jurisdiction, power and authority, executive or otherwise in respect of Singapore, which revested in the Yang di-Pertuan Negara of Singapore.[22] The Republic of Singapore Independence Act 1965[23] then vested the executive authority of Singapore in the newly created post of president, and made it exercisable by him or by the Cabinet or by any minister authorized by the Cabinet.

Structure of government

[edit]

Singapore inherited a Westminster system of government from the British. In such systems, there is an overlap between the executive and legislative branches of government. The head of state, who is the president of Singapore, is a member of both the executive Government of Singapore and the Parliament of Singapore but plays a minimal role in them. Executive power lies in the hands of the Cabinet, which is made up of the prime minister of Singapore (the head of government) and other ministers.[24] At the same time, the prime minister and ministers are also Members of Parliament (MPs).

Following constitutional reforms in 1991, the office of president was transformed from an appointed to an elected post. Thus, both the president and MPs are elected to their posts by the citizens of Singapore in separate elections.[25]

Appointment of Cabinet

[edit]
Tharman Shanmugaratnam, the incumbent president of Singapore.

The president appoints as prime minister an MP who is likely to command the confidence of the majority of the MPs.[26] In practice, the prime minister is usually the leader of the political party holding the majority of the seats in Parliament.[27]

The president also appoints other ministers to the Cabinet from among the MPs, acting in accordance with the prime minister's advice.[26] Any MP, including a Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) or a Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP), may be appointed a minister. Thus it is possible for a person who was not elected by voters to be appointed by Parliament as an NMP, then by the president as a minister. In 1990, then deputy prime minister Goh Chok Tong said in Parliament: "I would rather that a government has the flexibility to appoint the right person to be the minister for finance, than to compel that government to select from whoever is available in the House."[28] However, he added that the Government had no intention to appoint a Cabinet minister from among the NMPs at that time. In May 2009, then MP Hri Kumar proposed during a Parliamentary debate that this stand be reconsidered as the prime minister would be able to draw on the experience of many capable Singaporeans. He expressed the view that this would not offend democratic principles. Singapore's Parliamentary system placed more weight on the party in power rather than individual MPs, and "Parliamentarians must still win the support from the ground and, ultimately, the PM and the ruling party and his Cabinet team will still be answerable to the electorate at elections."[29] Critics have commented that adopting the practice would disenchant Singaporeans, deepen the already parochial political culture, and lead to a lack of accountability and legitimacy.[30]

Before entering on the duties of their office, the prime minister and other ministers must take and subscribe (sign) the Oath of Allegiance and an oath for the due execution of their offices before the president.[31] The Oath of Allegiance reads as follows:

I, [name], having been appointed to the office of [name of office], do solemnly swear [or affirm] that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Republic of Singapore and that I will preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore.[32]

The oath for the due execution of the office of prime minister or a minister is as follows:

I, [name], being chosen and appointed as Prime Minister [or Minister] of Singapore, do solemnly swear [or affirm] that I will at all times faithfully discharge my duties as Prime Minister [or Minister] according to law, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, without fear or favour, affection or ill-will.[33]

Cabinet members are prohibited from holding any office of profit or actively engaging in any commercial enterprise.[34] In addition, they are required to comply with a Code of Conduct for Ministers.[35] For example, to counter potential allegations of corruption and unexplained wealth and to avoid potential conflicts between private interests and public responsibilities, the Code requires every minister, upon appointment to office, to disclose in confidence to the president through the prime minister all sources of income other than his salary as a minister and as an MP. This must include all assets, such as financial assets, real property, interests in any company or professional practice, and any other substantial personal assets as well as financial liabilities, including mortgages and borrowings.[36] A Minister must also "scrupulously avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest between his office and his private financial interests".[37] Thus, a minister is not permitted to accept any favour of any kind from persons in negotiation with, or seeking to obtain any licence or enter into any contractual relations with, the Government,[38] or to use official information that comes to him as a minister for his own private profit or the profit of any family member or associate.[39]

Vacation of office

[edit]

The president must declare the office of prime minister vacant if the prime minister resigns from office, or if the president, acting in his discretion, is satisfied that the prime minister has ceased to command the confidence of a majority of the MPs. In the latter situation, the president is required first to inform the prime minister of his evaluation in this regard, and if the prime minister requests him to, the president may dissolve Parliament instead of making a declaration of vacancy.[40] A general election must be held within three months after the dissolution of Parliament.[41] This gives the former prime minister the opportunity to consolidate support by receiving a fresh mandate at the polls.[27]

At present, it is not clear what evidence the president may rely on to be satisfied that the prime minister has ceased to command the confidence of a majority of MPs, as the Singapore courts have not yet had to decide the issue. In the Sarawak case of Stephen Kalong Ningkan v. Tun Abang Haji Openg,[42] decided on provisions similar to those in the Singapore Constitution, the court found that the phrase ceased to command the confidence of a majority of the Members of Parliament was a term of art which had to be signified by a formal vote of no confidence taken by the legislature. In contrast, a Sabah court held in Datuk Amir Kahar v. Tun Mohd Said bin Keruak, Yang di-Pertua Negeri Sabah[43] that loss of confidence could be assessed on the basis of evidence other than a legislative vote.[44] This might include, for instance, media reports or letters addressed to the president.

Other Cabinet ministers must vacate their office if they resign, or if their appointments are revoked by the president acting in accordance with the advice of the prime minister.[45] People who vacate their office as minister may, if qualified, be subsequently appointed again as a minister.[46]

The prime minister and other ministers who make up the Cabinet do not vacate their offices upon a dissolution of Parliament, but continue in their posts until the first sitting of the next Parliament following a general election.[47]

Responsibilities and remuneration

[edit]
The Cabinet is headed by the prime minister, Lawrence Wong

The executive authority of Singapore is vested in the president and is exercisable by him or by the Cabinet of Singapore or any minister authorized by the Cabinet.[48] However, the president normally plays a nominal and largely ceremonial role in the executive branch of government. Although the president acts in his personal discretion in the exercise of certain functions as a check on the Cabinet and Parliament of Singapore,[49] he is otherwise required to act in accordance with the advice of the Cabinet or of a minister acting under the general authority of the Cabinet.[50] It is the Cabinet that has the general direction and control of the Government.[51] As Singapore follows the Westminster system of government, the legislative agenda of Parliament is determined by the Cabinet. At the start of each new Parliamentary session, the president gives an address prepared by the Cabinet that outlines what the Cabinet intends to achieve in the session.[52]

Under the Constitution, the Cabinet is collectively responsible to Parliament.[51] In theory, Parliament acts as a check on the power of the Cabinet as ministers are required to justify their actions and policies upon being questioned by MPs. However, in Singapore this is a weak check because the ruling People's Action Party holds a large Parliamentary majority, and party members who are MPs are required by party discipline to vote according to the party Whip's instructions.[44]

The Cabinet may not be summoned except by the authority of the prime minister.[53] As far as is practicable, the prime minister is required to attend and preside at Cabinet meetings, but in his absence he may appoint another minister to preside.[54]

Whenever the prime minister is ill, absent from Singapore, or has been granted leave of absence from his duties, the functions conferred on him by the Constitution are exercisable by any other minister authorized by the president.[55] In general, the president must act in accordance with the prime minister's advice in appointing a minister for this purpose. However, the president may act in his own discretion if in his opinion it is impracticable to obtain the advice of the prime minister due to his illness or absence.[56]

Responsibilities of ministers

[edit]

The prime minister may, by giving written directions, charge any minister with responsibility for any department or subject.[57] In practice, this is done by issuing notifications that are published in the Government Gazette. For instance, the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (Responsibility of senior minister and Co-ordinating Minister for National Security, Prime Minister's Office) Notification 2009[58] states:

It is hereby notified for general information that, pursuant to Article 30(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore, the Prime Minister has directed that Mr S. Jayakumar shall, with effect from 1 April 2009, be charged with the responsibility for the following matters:

(a) national security issues involving or affecting more than one Ministry;
(b) Chairmanship of the Security Policy Review Committee;
(c) foreign policy issues involving or affecting more than one Ministry; and
(d) foreign policy issues which involve legal negotiation or international adjudication,

and that he shall be designated as Senior Minister and Co-ordinating Minister for National Security.

Ministers may be designated by the prime minister to be in charge of particular ministries, or as ministers in the Prime Minister's Office. Such ministers were formerly known as ministers without portfolio.

The prime minister may retain any department or subject in his charge.[59]

Remuneration

[edit]

Before 2010

[edit]

When Singapore gained its independence from Malaysia in 1965, the prime minister's monthly salary was based on that of the chief minister when Singapore was still a British colony, and was fixed at S$3,500 (equivalent to $14,867 in 2022). The monthly salary was not adjusted until 1973, when ministerial pay was revised and the prime minister's salary was increased to S$9,500 (equivalent to $40,353 in 2022) a month. The justification given by then prime minister Lee Kuan Yew was to help select new leaders amidst a better economic position.[60]

In 1994, then prime minister Goh Chok Tong received a monthly salary of nearly S$96,000 (equivalent to $407,773 in 2022, about S$1.15 million a year), while other ministers earned about S$48,900 (equivalent to $207,710 in 2022, about S$586,800 a year). This made them among the highest paid government ministers in the world.[61] In October that year, the Government issued a white paper entitled Competitive Salaries for Competent & Honest Government[62] which proposed that the salaries of ministers and civil servants be pegged at two-thirds the average principal earned income of the top four earners in six professions: accounting, banking, engineering, law, local manufacturing firms and multinational corporations. These professions were chosen because their top members had general management skills which ministers also had to have. According to the white paper, the one-third "discount" would be "a visible demonstration of the sacrifice involved in becoming a minister". Although "[s]alaries should never be the motivation for persons to become ministers", the financial sacrifice had to be minimized if outstanding and committed Singaporeans were to be encouraged to take on the "risks and public responsibilities of a political career".[63] The benchmark would also be used to determine the pay of the president, prime minister, deputy prime minister, Attorney-General, Chairman of the Public Service Commission and judges.[63]

Following Parliamentary approval of the white paper in November 1994,[64] the Government established an independent panel to examine the benchmark for the prime minister's salary. The panel's report, released in January 1995, recommended that the benchmark be about $1.6 million a year, but said it would be reasonable for the prime minister to be paid $2.4 million in view of his heavy responsibilities. The Government said that in three years it planned to raise the pay of the prime minister to $1.46 million and that of ministers to 60% of the benchmark, and in the "longer term" to $1.6 million and two-thirds of the benchmark respectively.[65]

In February 1996, it was reported that a survey of 19 countries by the World Economic Forum magazine World Link had found that political leaders and senior civil servants of Singapore had the highest salaries.[citation needed] The pay of the Singapore prime minister (S$1.1 million, or US$812,858) was almost five times the average pay of the chief political executives of the nations surveyed (US$168,291). Senior civil servants were paid US$292,714, almost three times their counterparts' average pay.[66]

In August 2000, in view of the Singapore economy's growth of almost 10% led by a rapid increase in exports, the salary of the prime minister was increased by 14% and those of other ministers by 12%. In response to public disquiet, Goh Chok Tong said that, spread across the population, the rises amounted to about $11 per person, equivalent to "about five plates of char kway teow [fried noodles with cockles] per Singaporean".[67] Subsequently, in late 2001, when Singapore experienced its worst recession in a generation, ministerial pay was reduced by more than 17%. Nonetheless, it was reported that the prime minister still earned a gross annual salary of about $1.03 million before the variable component was taken into account.[67]

In April 2007, the prime minister's annual salary increased to S$3.1 million (US$2.05 million), about five times that of the then president of the United States George W. Bush who earned US$400,000.[68] The annual entry-level salary for ministers increased from $1.2 million to $1.6 million, and was projected to rise to 88% of the private sector benchmark by the end of 2008. Almost half of ministers' pay packages was made up of an individual performance bonus decided by the prime minister, and a variable bonus component based on the country's prevailing gross domestic product and capped at eight months of each minister's annual salary.[69] The pay increases were justified by the Government on the grounds that the salaries had to keep pace with those in the private sector to attract the best talent and to avoid corruption. Teo Chee Hean, the then Minister for Defence and minister in charge of the civil service, was reported as saying: "We don't want pay to be the reason for people to join [the government]. But we also don't want pay to be the reason for them not to join us, or to leave after joining us."[68] The increases sparked much debate both in and out of Parliament, with many people seeing ministerial pay as already being too high.[68] During a Parliamentary debate on the issue, then Nominated Member of Parliament Thio Li-ann said: "It would be a sad indictment of my generation if no one came forward to serve without excessive monetary inducement, as to be bereft of deep convictions is to be impoverished indeed."[70] On 11 April 2007, then prime minister Lee Hsien Loong told Parliament: "To make it quite clear why I am doing this, and also to give me the moral standing to defend this policy with Singaporeans, I will hold my own salary at the present level for five years. The government will pay me my full salary, because that is the way the system will have to work, but for five years, whatever the increase in the salary above its present level, I will donate to suitable good causes."[71] The following day, it was clarified that the Prime Minister had decided to do so a while ago, and that he had not been influenced by pressure arising from the announcement of the ministerial pay rise.[72]

In 2008, the annual salary for entry-level ministers was $1,924,300.[73] In view of the worsening economic crisis in 2008–2009, as of January 2009 the prime minister's salary was cut to $3.04 million, while the pay of ministerial-grade officers was reduced by 18% to $1.57 million.[74] In November 2009, the Public Service Division announced that pay increments would be deferred for a second time in 2010 because of the uncertain economic recovery. A minister's 2009 salary of $1,494,700 per year was therefore 22% lower than the salary received in 2008.[73]

2011 review

[edit]

As at 31 December 2010, the remuneration of ministers depended on which ministerial grade – from the lowest to the highest, MR4, MR3, MR2 or MR1 – they were at.[75] Each minister's pay package was made up of fixed components (a monthly salary for 12 months, a non-pensionable annual allowance of one month's salary, a special allowance of one month's salary, and a public service leadership allowance of two months' salary) and variable components (an annual variable component, a performance bonus, and a gross domestic product (GDP) bonus). The annual variable component of up to one and a half-month's salary was paid based on Singapore's economic performance. In years where economic performance was exceptional, a special variable payment was also made. Each minister's performance bonus was determined by the prime minister and could be up to 14 months' salary, though most good performers received the equivalent of nine months' salary. The GDP bonus depended on the nation's GDP growth rate. No bonus was paid if the rate was below 2%, and a maximum bonus of eight months' salary was paid if the rate was 10% or greater. In addition, ministers received the same medical benefits as civil servants.[76] In 2010, the benchmark annual remuneration for an MR4-grade minister was $2,598,004, while the actual salary paid was $1,583,900.[77] An MR1-grade minister's salary was $2,368,500.[78] The annual pay of the prime minister was set at a fixed ratio to the MR4 salary,[75] and was $3,072,200 in 2010.[77] This included a fixed service bonus in lieu of a performance bonus since there was no one to assess the prime minister's individual performance. The fixed service bonus was the same as the performance bonus paid to a good performer at the MR4 grade.[79]

On 21 May 2011, following the 2011 general election, the prime minister announced that a committee would be appointed to review politicians' remuneration, and that revised salaries would take effect from that date. The committee to Review Ministerial Salaries, then chaired by Gerard Ee rendered its report on 30 December 2011, and released it to the public on 4 January 2012. As regards ministerial pay, the Committee recommended benchmarking an MR4-grade minister's salary to the median income of the top 1,000 wage earners who are Singapore citizens, with a 40% discount "to signify the sacrifice that comes with the ethos of political service".[80] It also recommended removing the special allowance and public service leadership allowance; capping performance bonuses at six months' salary (with good performers generally receiving three months' salary); and replacing the GDP bonus with a national bonus based on four equally weighted indicators: the real median income growth rate (that is, the growth rate taking inflation into account), the real growth rate of the incomes of the lowest 20th percentile earners, the unemployment rate, and the real GDP growth rate. As regards the latter, no bonus will be paid if the minimum targets for the indicators are not met. A bonus of three months' salary will be paid if the targets are met, and a maximum bonus of six months' salary if the targets are greatly exceeded.[81] This would result in a reduction of an M4-grade minister's annual salary by 31% of the 2010 figure to $1.1 million.[82][83]

Where the prime minister's remuneration was concerned, the Committee recommended that it be pegged to twice of a MR4-grade minister's salary and doing away with the fixed service bonus. Instead, the prime minister will receive a larger national bonus. His annual bonus where the targets for the indicators have been met will be six months' salary, and 12 months' salary where they have been greatly exceeded.[84] This will lead to a reduction in the prime minister's annual salary of 28% to $2.2 million (about US$1.7 million).[85] Lee Hsien Loong said that he accepted the committee's recommendations. He remains the best-paid head of government in the world, his proposed annual pay package exceeding that of the then Chief Executive of Hong Kong Sir Donald Tsang, the political leader with the second-highest salary in the world (around US$550,000), by about three times; and that of then president of the United States Barack Obama (US$400,000)[86] by over four times.[87]

The committee's report was discussed in Parliament from 16 to 18 January 2012. Setting out the position of the Workers' Party, Chen Show Mao said that the basic monthly salary of an MP should be $11,000, the pay of an MX9-grade director in the Management Executive Scheme of the Civil Service. A minister should be paid five times this sum ($55,000), and the prime minister nine times ($99,000). then NCMP Gerald Giam said that ministers should obtain an average annual bonus of three months of their base salaries, and in any case no more than five months' bonus. Two-thirds of the bonus should be made up of the national bonus, and the remaining third based on the individual's performance, which should be determined according to key performance indicators fixed for each ministry at the start of a new government's term. Moreover, only a portion of bonuses should be paid at the end of each year. Payment of the remainder should be deferred until the end of the government's term. If the minister's performance is poor, some of the withheld bonus should be clawed back.[88][89] The WP's proposal was criticized by a number of PAP MPs. Then senior Minister of State for Health Amy Khor expressed the view that "[p]olitical service is much more than public service. Civil servants are not subject to the votes of citizens nor do they need to carry the ground in policymaking. ... Pegging ministerial salaries to civil service salaries is not an adequate mechanism to account for the burdens and responsibilities that come with the job."[89]

Rounding up the debate, then deputy prime minister Teo Chee Hean said that under the WP's proposal for calculating ministerial salaries, the quantum achieved was similar to the sum proposed by the committee, and that in his view the WP had approved the three principles of the new system: the requirement for the pay to be competitive, recognition of the ethos of political service, and the desirability of a "clean wage" system (that is, one in which ministers do not receive additional benefits such as housing and medical allowances).[90][91] PAP MPs then voted to endorse the committee's proposals.[91]

On 26 March 2012, the Public Service Division of the Prime Minister's Office announced that the fixed component of the salary of a political appointment holder would be 13 months of his or her monthly salary. For 2011, the annual variable component of the salary would be 1.25 months plus $250, while the national bonus would be 2.625 months though appointment holders would receive a pro rata amount of 1.618 months' pay as the new salaries took effect from 21 May 2011 when the Cabinet was appointed following the general election. The targets for the four indicators making up the national bonus were 2–3% for real median income growth of citizens and real median income growth for the lowest 20th percentile of citizens, 3–5% for real GDP growth, and not more than 4.5% for the unemployment rate of citizens. Each appointment holder's performance bonus would be determined by the prime minister.[92]

Pensions

[edit]

At present, persons who have reached the age of 50 years and retired as MPs and who have served in this capacity for not less than nine years may be granted a pension for the rest of their lives. The annual amount payable is 130 of the person's highest annual salary for every completed year of service and 1360 for every uncompleted year, up to a ceiling of two-thirds of the Member's annual salary.[93] In addition, a retired MP who is at least 50 years old and has for not less than eight years held the office of prime minister, deputy prime minister, senior minister or minister[94] may receive an additional pension each year of 127 of his or her highest annual salary for each completed year of service and 1324 for each uncompleted year, subject again to a ceiling of two-thirds of the office-holder's annual salary.[95] Members who have reached the age of 55 years and have served not less than eight years as ministers may be granted a pension even if they have not yet ceased to hold office.[96] No person has an absolute right to compensation for past services or to any pension or gratuity, and the president may reduce or withhold pensions and gratuities upon an MP's conviction for corruption.[97]

The committee to Review Ministerial Salaries recommended that pensions for political appointment holders be abolished in favour of Central Provident Fund payments. Appointment holders appointed on and after 21 May 2011 will not receive any pension, while those appointed before that date will only be eligible for pensions accrued up to that date. Such pensions will be paid after they step down or retire from office.[98] If the removal of pensions is taken into account, the prime minister's annual salary will be reduced from the 2010 figure by 36%, and that of MR4-grade ministers by 37%.[83][99]

Current cabinet

[edit]

The First Lawrence Wong Cabinet is composed of the following members. On 16 April 2024, then Prime Minister-designate Lawrence Wong announced that then outgoing Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong would assume the office of Senior Minister and stay on in his cabinet after stepping down as the Prime Minister on 15 May 2024.[100]

Composition of the Cabinet[101]
Portfolio Minister Portrait Date
Prime Minister Lawrence Wong Lawrence Wong 15 May 2024
Minister for Finance 15 May 2021
Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong Lee Hsien Loong 15 May 2024
Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong Gan Kim Yong 15 May 2024
Minister for Trade and Industry 15 May 2021
Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat Heng Swee Keat 1 May 2019
Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean Teo Chee Hean 1 May 2019
Coordinating Minister for National Security 1 October 2015
Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen Ng Eng Hen 21 May 2011
Minister for Foreign Affairs Vivian Balakrishnan Vivian Balakrishnan 1 October 2015
Minister for Home Affairs K. Shanmugam K. Shanmugam 1 October 2015
Minister for Law 1 May 2008
Minister for Sustainability and the Environment Grace Fu Hai Yen Grace Fu 27 July 2020
Minister-in-charge of Trade Relations 18 January 2024
Minister for Education Chan Chun Sing Chan Chun Sing 15 May 2021
Minister for Social and Family Development Masagos Zulkifli Masagos Zulkifli 27 July 2020
Second Minister of Health
Minister-in-Charge of Muslim Affairs 1 May 2018
Minister for Health Ong Ye Kung Ong Ye Kung 15 May 2021
Minister for National Development Desmond Lee Desmond Lee 27 July 2020
Minister-in-charge of Social Service Integration
Minister for Digitial Development and Information Josephine Teo Josephine Teo 15 May 2021
Second Minister for Home Affairs 11 September 2017
Minister-in-Charge of the Smart Nation Initiative 15 May 2021
Minister-in-Charge of Cybersecurity
Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Indranee Thurai Rajah Indranee Rajah 1 May 2018
Second Minister for Finance
Second Minister for National Development 27 July 2020
Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Maliki Osman Maliki Osman 27 July 2020
Second Minister for Education
Second Minister for Foreign Affairs
Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Edwin Tong Edwin Tong 27 July 2020
Second Minister of Law
Minister for Manpower Tan See Leng Tan See Leng 15 May 2021
Second Minister for Trade and Industry 27 July 2020
Minister for Transport Chee Hong Tat Chee Hong Tat 18 January 2024
Second Minister for Finance

Senior Ministers of State

[edit]
Composition of the Cabinet
Portfolio Minister Portrait Date
Senior Minister of State for Defence Heng Chee How 1 May 2018
Senior Minister of State for Sustainability and the Environment Amy Khor 27 July 2020
Senior Minister of State for Transport
Senior Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Sim Ann 15 May 2021
Senior Minister of State for National Development 27 July 2020
Senior Minister of State for Digital Development and Information Janil Puthucheary 1 May 2017
Senior Minister of State for Health 27 July 2020
Senior Minister of State for Manpower Koh Poh Koon 15 May 2021
Senior Minister of State for Sustainability and the Environment 13 June 2022
Senior Minister of State for Defence Zaqy Mohamad 27 July 2020
Senior Minister of State for Manpower
Senior Minister of State for Digital Development and Information Tan Kiat How 13 June 2022
Senior Minister of State for National Development
Senior Minister of State for Culture, Community and Youth Low Yen Ling 15 May 2024
Senior Minister of State for Trade and Industry
Senior Minister of State in the Prime Minister's Office Desmond Tan 15 May 2024

Ministers of State

[edit]
Composition of the Cabinet
Portfolio Minister Portrait Date
Minister of State for Home Affairs Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim 27 July 2020
Minister of State for National Development
Minister of State for Home Affairs Sun Xueling 13 June 2022
Minister of State for Social and Family Development 27 July 2020
Minister of State for Education Gan Siow Huang 15 May 2021
Minister of State for Manpower 27 July 2020
Minister of State for Culture, Community and Youth Alvin Tan 1 Sep 2020
Minister of State for Trade and Industry
Minister of State for Digital Development and Information Rahayu Mahzam 15 May 2024
Minister of State for Health
Minister of State for Transport Murali Pillai 1 July 2024
Minister of State for Law

Senior Parliamentary Secretaries

[edit]
Composition of the Cabinet
Portfolio Minister Portrait Date
Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Sustainability and the Environment Baey Yam Keng 13 June 2022
Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Transport 1 May 2018
Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Culture, Community and Youth Eric Chua 13 June 2022
Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Social and Family Development
Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Education Shawn Huang 15 May 2024
Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Finance

Timeline of members

[edit]

The following is a list of the members of the Cabinet of Singapore since the 1959 Singaporean general election. Members ranked first have held either the office of prime minister, deputy prime minister, senior minister or principal cabinet portfolios (finance, defence, foreign affairs and home affairs). This list excludes ministers of state and parliamentary secretaries.

  • 1st Cabinet (formed June 1959): Lee Kuan Yew (PM), Toh Chin Chye (DPM), Goh Keng Swee, Ong Pang Boon
  • 2nd Cabinet (formed October 1963): Lee Kuan Yew, Toh Chin Chye, Goh Keng Swee, Lim Kim San (S), S. Rajaratnam (S)
  • 3rd Cabinet (formed April 1968): Lee Kuan Yew, Goh Keng Swee, S. Rajaratnam, Ong Pang Boon, Hon Sui Sen (S), Wong Lin Ken (S)
  • 4th Cabinet (formed September 1972): Lee Kuan Yew, Goh Keng Swee (DPM), S. Rajaratnam, Hon Sui Sen, Edmund W. Barker, Chua Sian Chin (S)
  • 5th Cabinet (formed December 1976): Lee Kuan Yew, Goh Keng Swee, S. Rajaratnam (DPM), Hon Sui Sen, Chua Sian Chin, Howe Yoon Chong (S), S. Dhanabalan (S)
  • 6th Cabinet (formed January 1981): Lee Kuan Yew, Goh Keng Swee, S. Rajaratnam, Hon Sui Sen (†), Chua Sian Chin, Howe Yoon Chong, S. Dhanabalan, Goh Chok Tong (S), Tony Tan (S)
  • 7th Cabinet (formed January 1985): Lee Kuan Yew, Goh Chok Tong (DPM), Ong Teng Cheong (DPM), S. Rajaratnam (SM), S. Dhanabalan, Tony Tan, S. Jayakumar, Richard Hu (S)
  • 8th Cabinet (formed September 1988): Lee Kuan Yew, Goh Chok Tong, Ong Teng Cheong, S. Jayakumar, Richard Hu, Wong Kan Seng
  • 9th Cabinet (formed November 1990): Goh Chok Tong (PM), Lee Kuan Yew (SM), Ong Teng Cheong, Lee Hsien Loong (DPM), S. Jayakumar, Richard Hu, Wong Kan Seng, Yeo Ning Hong (S)
  • 10th Cabinet (formed September 1991): Goh Chok Tong, Lee Kuan Yew, Ong Teng Cheong, Lee Hsien Loong, Tony Tan (DPM), S. Jayakumar, Richard Hu, Wong Kan Seng, Yeo Ning Hong, Lee Boon Yang (S)
  • 11th Cabinet (formed January 1997): Goh Chok Tong, Lee Kuan Yew, Lee Hsien Loong, Tony Tan, S. Jayakumar, Richard Hu, Wong Kan Seng
  • 12th Cabinet (formed November 2001): Goh Chok Tong, Lee Kuan Yew, Lee Hsien Loong, Tony Tan, S. Jayakumar, Wong Kan Seng, Teo Chee Hean (S)
  • 13th Cabinet (formed August 2004): Lee Hsien Loong (PM), Goh Chok Tong (SM), Lee Kuan Yew (MM), Tony Tan, S. Jayakumar (DPM), Wong Kan Seng, Teo Chee Hean, George Yeo
  • 14th Cabinet (formed May 2006): Lee Hsien Loong, Goh Chok Tong, Lee Kuan Yew, Teo Chee Hean (DPM), Wong Kan Seng (DPM), S. Jayakumar (SM), George Yeo (L), Tharman Shanmugaratnam (S), K. Shanmugam (S)
  • 15th Cabinet (formed May 2011): Lee Hsien Loong, Teo Chee Hean, Tharman Shanmugaratnam (DPM), K. Shanmugam, Ng Eng Hen
  • 16th Cabinet (formed September 2015): Lee Hsien Loong, Heng Swee Keat (DPM), Teo Chee Hean (SM), Tharman Shanmugaratnam (SM), K. Shanmugam, Ng Eng Hen, Vivian Balakrishnan
  • 17th Cabinet (formed July 2020): Lee Hsien Loong, Heng Swee Keat, Lawrence Wong (DPM), Teo Chee Hean, Tharman Shanmugaratnam (R), K. Shanmugam, Ng Eng Hen, Vivian Balakrishnan
  • 18th Cabinet (formed May 2024): Lawrence Wong (PM), Lee Hsien Loong (SM), Heng Swee Keat, Gan Kim Yong (DPM), Teo Chee Hean, K. Shanmugam, Ng Eng Hen, Vivian Balakrishnan

Notes:

  • (PM): Appointed prime minister
  • (DPM): Appointed deputy prime minister
  • (SM): Appointed senior minister
  • (MM): Appointed minister mentor
  • (S): Appointed via cabinet reshuffle
  • (L): Lost re-election
  • (R): Resigned from office
  • (†): Died in office
Tan See LengChee Hong TatNg Chee MengOng Ye KungEdwin TongDesmond Lee (Singaporean politician)Tan Chuan-JinChan Chun SingLawrence WongHeng Swee KeatJosephine TeoMasagos ZulkifliGrace FuLui Tuck YewMaliki OsmanIndranee RajahGan Kim YongRaymond LimKhaw Boon WanVivian BalakrishnanNg Eng HenTharman ShanmugaratnamS. IswaranLim Hwee HuaYaacob IbrahimLim Swee SayTeo Chee HeanLim Hng KiangMah Bow TanK. ShanmugamGeorge YeoAbdullah TarmugiLee Boon YangYeo Cheow TongWong Kan SengLee Hsien LoongRichard HuLim Boon HengLee Yock SuanYeo Ning HongS. Jayakumar (Singaporean politician)Teh Cheang WanTony TanHowe Yoon ChongLim Chee OnnS. DhanabalanGoh Chok TongAhmad MattarOng Teng CheongHon Sui SenWong Lin KenLee Chiaw MengChua Sian ChinEdmund W. BarkerOthman WokJek Yeun ThongLim Kim SanTan Kia GanOng Eng GuanAhmad Ibrahim (Singaporean politician)Kenneth Michael ByrneYong Nyuk LinOng Pang BoonS. RajaratnamGoh Keng SweeToh Chin ChyeLee Kuan YewFirst Lawrence Wong CabinetFifth Lee Hsien Loong CabinetFourth Lee Hsien Loong CabinetThird Lee Hsien Loong CabinetSecond Lee Hsien Loong CabinetFirst Lee Hsien Loong CabinetFourth Goh Chok Tong CabinetThird Goh Chok Tong CabinetSecond Goh Chok Tong CabinetFirst Goh Chok Tong CabinetEighth Lee Kuan Yew CabinetSeventh Lee Kuan Yew CabinetSixth Lee Kuan Yew CabinetFifth Lee Kuan Yew CabinetFourth Lee Kuan Yew CabinetThird Lee Kuan Yew CabinetSecond Lee Kuan Yew CabinetFirst Lee Kuan Yew Cabinet

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "White Paper - Salaries for a Capable and Committed Government". Public Service Division. 10 January 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 May 2015. Retrieved 1 January 2016.
  2. ^ "Committee to review salaries of the President, Prime Minister and Political Appointment Holders" (Press release). Prime Minister's Office. 22 May 2011. Archived from the original on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 15 April 2020.
  3. ^ Mathew, Jerin (28 March 2015). "Singapore PM Lee Hsien Loong remains highest paid country leader with $1.7m annual salary". International Business Times. Retrieved 1 January 2016.
  4. ^ "PM Lee announces new Cabinet; 6 office holders promoted, 3 retirements". CNA. Archived from the original on 25 July 2020. Retrieved 26 July 2020.
  5. ^ Letters patent dated 17 November 1877.
  6. ^ 1877 letters patent, Art. II.
  7. ^ Richard Olaf Winstedt (1931), The Constitution of the Colony of the Straits Settlements and the Federated and Unfederated Malay States, London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, p. 4.
  8. ^ Kevin Tan Yew Lee (1999), "A Short Legal and Constitutional History of Singapore", in Kevin Y. L. Tan (ed.), The Singapore Legal System (2nd ed.), Singapore: Singapore University Press, p. 26 at 37, ISBN 978-9971-69-213-1.
  9. ^ By the Straits Settlements (Repeal) Act 1946 (9 & 10 Geo. 4. c. 37) and the Singapore Order-in-Council 1946, S. R. & O., 1946, No. 462 (UK), dated 27 March 1946.
  10. ^ Tan, "A Short Legal and Constitutional History of Singapore", p. 41.
  11. ^ By the Singapore Colony Order-in-Council 1955, S.I. 1955, No. 187 (UK).
  12. ^ Yeo Kim Wah (1973), Political Development in Singapore, 1945–55, [Singapore]: Singapore University Press, p. 62.
  13. ^ Tan, "A Short Legal and Constitutional History of Singapore", pp. 42–43.
  14. ^ Turnbull, Constance Mary (1977), A History of Singapore, 1819–1975, Kuala Lumpur; New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press, p. 263, ISBN 978-0-19-580354-9.
  15. ^ Turnbull, p. 264.
  16. ^ Singapore (Constitution) Order-in-Council 1958, S.I. 1958, No. 156 (UK).
  17. ^ Singapore (Constitution) Order-in-Council 1958 (UK), Art. 21.
  18. ^ Singapore (Constitution) Order-in-Council 1958 (UK), Arts. 15–19.
  19. ^ Tan, "A Short Legal and Constitutional History of Singapore", pp. 44–45.
  20. ^ Tan, "A Short Legal and Constitutional History of Singapore", p. 46.
  21. ^ Constitution and Malaysia (Singapore Amendment) Act 1965 (No. 53 of 1965) (Malaysia), ss. 4 and 5.
  22. ^ Constitution and Malaysia (Singapore Amendment) Act 1965 (Malaysia), s. 6.
  23. ^ Republic of Singapore Independence Act 1965 (No. 9 of 1965, 1985 Rev. Ed.), s. 4.
  24. ^ Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (1985 Rev. Ed., 1999 Reprint), Art. 24(1).
  25. ^ Constitution, Arts. 17(2) ("The President shall be elected by the citizens of Singapore in accordance with any law made by the Legislature.") and 39(1) ("Parliament shall consist of – (a) such number of elected Members as is required to be returned at a general election by the constituencies prescribed by or under any law made by the Legislature; (b) such other members ... who shall be known as non-constituency Members ...; and (c) such other Members ... who shall be known as nominated Members ..." The procedure for elections is governed by the Presidential Elections Act (Cap. 240A, 2011 Rev. Ed.) and the Parliamentary Elections Act (Cap. 218, 2011 Rev. Ed.).
  26. ^ a b Singapore Constitution, Art. 25(1).
  27. ^ a b Thio Li-ann (1999), "The Constitutional Framework of Powers", in Kevin Y L Tan (ed.), The Singapore Legal System (2nd ed.), Singapore: Singapore University Press, p. 67 at 84, ISBN 978-9971-69-213-1.
  28. ^ Speech of the First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence Goh Chok Tong on the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (Amendment) Bill, Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report (29 March 1990), vol. 55, col. 1045.
  29. ^ Speech of MP Hri Kumar Nair on the President's Address, Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report (26 May 2009), vol. 86 (no column numbers assigned yet).
  30. ^ Jeremy Au Yong; Zakir Hussain (13 June 2009), "Nominated ministers: Good or bad idea?", The Straits Times, p. A32.
  31. ^ Constitution. Art. 27.
  32. ^ Constitution, 1st Sch., para. 2.
  33. ^ Constitution, 1st Sch., paras. 4 and 4A.
  34. ^ Constitution, Art. 33.
  35. ^ Lau Wah Ming, Secretary to the Cabinet (4 July 2005), Code of Conduct for Ministers, Cabinet of Singapore (reproduced on the Getforme Singapore website), archived from the original on 12 June 2008, retrieved 26 April 2009.
  36. ^ Code of Conduct for Ministers, para. 1.1.
  37. ^ Code of Conduct for Ministers, para. 3.1.
  38. ^ Code of Conduct for Ministers, para. 3.4.
  39. ^ Code of Conduct for Ministers, para. 3.5.
  40. ^ Constitution, Art. 26(1).
  41. ^ Constitution, Art. 66.
  42. ^ Stephen Kalong Ningkan v. Tun Abang Haji Openg [1966] 2 M.L.J. [Malayan Law Journal] 187, declining to apply the approach taken by the Privy Council on appeal from Nigeria in Adegbenro v. Akintola [1963] UKPC 15, [1963] A.C. 614, Privy Council (on appeal from Nigeria). See also Thio Su Mien (1966), "Dismissal of Chief Ministers", Malaya Law Review, 8: 203.
  43. ^ Datuk Amir Kahar v. Tun Mohd Said bin Keruak, Yang di-Pertua Negeri Sabah [1995] 1 M.L.J. 169.
  44. ^ a b Thio, "The Constitutional Framework of Powers", p. 85.
  45. ^ Constitution, Art. 26(2).
  46. ^ Constitution, Art. 26(3).
  47. ^ Art. 26 of the Constitution does not list the dissolution of Parliament as a ground on which the Prime Minister and a minister must vacate their offices. In addition, Art. 25(2) states that an MP may be appointed as Prime Minister by the President when Parliament is dissolved, but that MP shall not continue to hold office after the first sitting of the next Parliament unless he is also an MP of that Parliament.
  48. ^ Constitution, Art. 23(1).
  49. ^ See, generally, Art. 21(2) of the Constitution.
  50. ^ Constitution, Art. 21(1).
  51. ^ a b Constitution, Art. 24(2).
  52. ^ Standing Orders of Parliament (as amended on 19 October 2004) (PDF), Parliament of Singapore, 19 October 2004, archived from the original (PDF) on 9 May 2010, retrieved 25 May 2009, Orders 15(1) ("At the conclusion of the President's speech delivered at the opening of any session, Parliament shall stand adjourned without any question being put. The Leader of the House shall give two clear days' notice naming an ordinary sitting day, not less than two clear days after the day on which the speech was delivered, for the next sitting of Parliament, and Parliament shall sit on the day stated in such notice.") and 15(2) ("Such notice shall also give notice for such sitting day, of a motion to be moved by a Minister or other Member named by the Leader of the House that an Address expressing the thanks of Parliament for the speech of the President be agreed to. Debate thereon shall be confined to the policy of the Government as outlined in the speech."). See also Singapore Constitution, Art. 62: "The President may address Parliament and may send messages thereto."
  53. ^ Constitution, Art. 28(1).
  54. ^ Constitution, Art. 28(2).
  55. ^ Constitution, Art. 26(4)(a). The President may revoke any such authority: Art. 26(4)(b).
  56. ^ Constitution, Art. 26(4)(c).
  57. ^ Constitution, Art. 30(1).
  58. ^ Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (Responsibility of Senior Minister and Co-ordinating Minister for National Security, Prime Minister's Office) Notification 2009 (S 142/2009).
  59. ^ Constitution, Art. 30(2).
  60. ^ "Lee Kuan Yew's salary as Prime Minister in 1973 was S$9,500 per month. His ministers? S$7,000". mothership.sg. Retrieved 4 April 2021.
  61. ^ Singapore ministers, top bureaucrats get pay hike, Reuters, 22 October 1994.
  62. ^ Competitive Salaries for Competent & Honest Government: Benchmarks for Ministers & Senior Public Officers: White Paper [Cmd. 13 of 1994], Singapore: Prime Minister's Office, 1994, ISBN 978-9971-88-443-7.
  63. ^ a b Chuang Peck Ming (22 October 1994), "Six professions to set pay for ministers and civil servants", Business Times (Singapore). See also Wang Hui Ling; Chung Tsung Mien; Jimmy Yap (28 October 1994), "32 say benchmarks too high, 25 think they are valid", The Straits Times; Warren Fernandez (2 November 1994), "Will S'poreans back SM Lee's judgment on White Paper?", The Straits Times; Chuang Peck Ming (4 November 1994), "MP warns of election backlash in debate on pay rise for ministers", Business Times (Singapore).
  64. ^ Chuang Peck Ming (1 November 1994), "Why it's fitting to peg ministers' pay to top private sector earners", Business Times (Singapore); Chuang Peck Ming (4 November 1994), "White paper on salary benchmarks approved", Business Times (Singapore).
  65. ^ Chuang Peck Ming (13 January 1995), "Independent panel recommends S$1.6m annual salary for S'pore PM", Business Times (Singapore).
  66. ^ Chua Mui Hoong (4 February 1996), "Ministers' pay – essential move despite political cost", The Straits Times.
  67. ^ a b Jake Lloyd-Smith (12 January 2003), "A lesson from the Lion City", South China Morning Post, p. 3.
  68. ^ a b c Derrick Ho (9 April 2007), Singapore's government ministers to get pay raise of more than 60 percent by 2008, Associated Press.
  69. ^ Derrick A. Paulo (10 April 2007), "In phases, tied to performance; Starting pay for ministers upped to $1.6m for now; 95% of civil servants will get raise", Today, p. 3.
  70. ^ Lydia Lim (27 April 2007), "Beware a poverty of convictions", The Straits Times.
  71. ^ Daniel Buenas (12 April 2007), "PM Lee to donate salary increase for next 5 years to charity", Business Times (Singapore); see also Singapore PM in damage control on salary: analysts, Agence France Presse, 12 April 2007.
  72. ^ "PM decided to donate his pay hikes a while ago", The Straits Times, 13 April 2007.
  73. ^ a b Sue-Ann Chia (27 November 2009), "Pay package of top civil servants and ministers down 22%", The Straits Times, p. A6.
  74. ^ Kenny Chee (25 November 2008), "Cut in annual pay for top civil servants", My Paper, p. A2.
  75. ^ a b Salaries for a Capable and Committed Government (PDF), Singapore: Committee to Review Ministerial Salaries, 30 December 2011, p. 11, para. 13, archived from the original (PDF) on 4 January 2012 ("Ministerial salaries report").
  76. ^ Ministerial salaries report, pp. 12–13, paras. 18–19.
  77. ^ a b Ministerial salaries report, p. 11, para. 14.
  78. ^ Ministerial salaries report, pp. 31–32, para. 85 and Table 3.
  79. ^ Ministerial salaries report, p. 27, para. 77.
  80. ^ Ministerial salaries report, p. 5.
  81. ^ Ministerial salaries report, pp. 25–27, para. 76.
  82. ^ Ministerial salaries report, p. 6. This is made up of a base pay of $715,000, a one-month annual variable component, a three-month performance bonus and a three-month national bonus* Janice Heng (12 January 2012), "$1.1 million ministerial pay includes bonuses", The Straits Times, pp. A1 & A4.
  83. ^ a b See also Lydia Lim (5 January 2012), "Ministers' starting pay cut to less than $1 million: Committee also proposes: Halving President's salary; Scrapping pensions, several allowances and bonuses", The Straits Times, pp. A1 & A4; Janice Heng (5 January 2012), "Salaries to be based on larger pool of top income earners: Enlarged group more representative, reduces volatility of benchmark", The Straits Times, pp. A6 – A7; Loh Chee Kong (5 January 2012), "Deep cuts proposed to pay of political leaders", Today, pp. 1 & 3.
  84. ^ Ministerial salaries report, p. 27, paras. 77–78.
  85. ^ Ministerial salaries report, p. 7.
  86. ^ Barbara L. Schwemle (11 January 2005), Salaries of Federal Officials: A Fact Sheet [Order Code 98-53 GOV] (PDF), Congressional Research Service, p. CRS-2, archived from the original (PDF) on 26 April 2013.
  87. ^ "Singapore snip: Prime minister takes big pay cut: Austerity hits wealthy city-state as Lee Hsien Loong accepts 36% wage reduction. But he will still be world's best-paid leader", The Guardian, London, 4 January 2012, archived from the original on 2 June 2012.
  88. ^ Janice Heng (17 January 2012), "Pay ministers five times an MP's allowance: WP", The Straits Times, pp. A1 & A12; Teo Xuanwei (17 January 2012), "No perfect solution to pay conundrum: DPM Teo", Today, pp. 1 & 4.
  89. ^ a b Tan Weizhen (17 January 2012), "Peg ministerial salaries to MPs' allowances: WP MP", Today, p. 3.
  90. ^ Tessa Wong (17 January 2012), "MPs favour clean wage system: Scheme with no hidden perks or benefits would be transparent, they say", The Straits Times, p. A11.
  91. ^ a b Li Xueying (19 January 2012), "'Real progress' in ministerial pay debate: Opposition's agreement on key points marks a breakthrough: DPM Teo", The Straits Times, pp. A1 & A6; Esther Ng (19 January 2012), "A new formula, with a 'common ground': Recommendations on ministerial salaries passed after broad agreement on principles", Today, p. 1.
  92. ^ "Ministers and office-holders to get National Bonus of 1.6 months", The Straits Times, p. A3, 27 March 2012; "1.618 months pro-rated National Bonus for political office-holders", Today, p. 1, 27 March 2012.
  93. ^ Parliamentary Pensions Act (Cap. 219, 1996 Rev. Ed.), s. 3.
  94. ^ The Parliamentary Pensions Act, s. 2(1), defines office as "the office of Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister, Speaker, Senior Minister, Minister, Senior Minister of State, Minister of State, Mayor, Senior Parliamentary Secretary, Parliamentary Secretary or Political Secretary".
  95. ^ Parliamentary Pensions Act, s. 4.
  96. ^ Parliamentary Pensions Act, s. 5.
  97. ^ Parliamentary Pensions Act, s. 13.
  98. ^ Ministerial salaries report, pp. 27–28, paras. 79–80.
  99. ^ Ministerial salaries report, pp. 6–7. See also Elgin Toh (5 January 2012), "Pension system for political office-holders to be scrapped", The Straits Times, p. A7.
  100. ^ "PM Lee to stay on as Senior Minister; any major Cabinet changes will come after GE: Lawrence Wong". CNA. 16 April 2024. Retrieved 17 April 2024.
  101. ^ Government of Singapore (16 May 2024). "The Cabinet". Prime Minister's Office (Singapore). Retrieved 17 May 2024.

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]

Books

[edit]

News reports

[edit]
  • Ong, Andrea (6 January 2012), "What price a minister? 42 years of controversy", The Straits Times, pp. A26 – A27.
[edit]