Jump to content

Operation Giant Lance: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Artic -> Arctic
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Changing short description from "Qsecret U.S. nuclear alert operation" to "1969 secret U.S. nuclear alert operation"
 
(32 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|1969 secret US B-52 patrols over Arctic polar ice caps to intimidate the USSR.}}
{{Short description|1969 secret U.S. nuclear alert operation}}
{{Infobox military conflict
{{Infobox military conflict
| conflict = Operation "Giant Lance"
| conflict = Operation "Giant Lance"
Line 10: Line 10:
| result = Inconclusive
| result = Inconclusive
| combatant1 = {{flag|United States}}
| combatant1 = {{flag|United States}}
| combatant2 = {{flag|Soviet Union}}
| combatant2 = {{flag|Soviet Union}}<br>{{flag|North Vietnam}}
| commander1 = {{flagicon|United States}} [[Richard Nixon]]
| commander1 = {{flagicon|United States}} [[Richard Nixon]]
| commander2 = {{flagicon|Soviet Union}} [[Leonid Brezhnev]]
| commander2 = {{flagicon|Soviet Union}} [[Leonid Brezhnev]]
| casualties1 =
| casualties1 =
| casualties2 =
| casualties2 =
| combatant3 = {{flag|North Vietnam}}
}}
}}
'''Operation Giant Lance''' was a secret [[military operation|U.S. nuclear alert operation]] by the [[United States]] that the Strategic Air Command carried out in late October 1969.<ref name=":9">{{cite web |url=https://www.wired.com/politics/security/magazine/16-03/ff_nuclearwar |last=Suri |first=Jeremi |title=The Nukes of October: Richard Nixon's Secret Plan to Bring Peace to Vietnam |publisher=[[Wired Magazine]] |date=2008-02-25 |accessdate=2012-01-28}}</ref> Giant Lance was one component of a multi-pronged military exercise, the [[Joint Chiefs of Staff Readiness Test#:~:text=Carried out at the direction,help end the Vietnam War.|Joint Chiefs of Staff Readiness Test]] that the Joint Chiefs developed and carried out during October 1969 in response to White House orders. On October 10, 1969, on the advice of [[National Security Advisor (United States)|National Security Advisor]] [[Henry Kissinger]], U.S. [[President of the United States|President]] [[Richard Nixon]] issued the order for the readiness test that led to Giant Lance.


'''Operation Giant Lance''' was an undercover [[military operation]] by the [[United States]] in which the primary objective was to apply military pressure towards the [[Soviet Union]] during the [[Cold War]].<ref name="suri">{{cite web|title=The Nukes of October: Richard Nixon's Secret Plan to Bring Peace to Vietnam|url=https://www.wired.com/politics/security/magazine/16-03/ff_nuclearwar|author=Jeremi Suri|date=2008-02-25|publisher=[[Wired Magazine]]|access-date=2012-01-28}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite book|last=Ventura|first=Jesse|title=63 Documents the Government Doesn't Want You to Read|url=https://archive.org/details/63documentsgover00vent|url-access=registration|publisher=Skyhorse|year=2011|isbn=978-1-61608-226-0|location=New York|pages=[https://archive.org/details/63documentsgover00vent/page/170 170]–174}}</ref>{{Better source needed|date=June 2020}}<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last1=Sagan|first1=Scott|last2=Suri|first2=Jeremi|date=2003|title=The Madman Nuclear Alert: Secrecy, Signaling, and Safety in October 1969|journal=International Security|volume=27|issue=4|pages=150–183|doi=10.1162/016228803321951126|jstor=4137607|s2cid=57564244}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last1=Burr|first1=William|last2=Kimball|first2=Jeffrey|date=2003|title=Nixon's Nuclear Ploy|journal=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists|volume=59|issue=1|pages=28–73|doi=10.2968/059001011|via=Taylor & Francis Online}}</ref> Initiated on October 27, 1969, [[President of the United States|President]] [[Richard Nixon]] authorized a squadron of 18 B-52 bombers to patrol the Arctic polar ice caps and escalate the nuclear threat poised.<ref name=":0" /> The goal was to coerce both the Soviet Union and [[North Vietnam]] to agree on favourable terms with the US, and conclusively end the [[Vietnam War]].<ref name=":1" /> The operation's effectiveness was also largely built on Nixon's consistent [[madman theory]] diplomacy, in order to influence Moscow's decision even more (Delpech, 2012). The operation was kept top secret from both the general public and higher authorities within the Strategic Air Command, intended to only be noticed by Russian intelligence.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3">{{Cite web|title=Nixon's Nuclear Ploy: The Vietnam Negotiations and the Joint Chiefs of Staff Readiness Test|url=https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB81/|last1=Burr|first1=William|last2=Kimball|first2=Jeffry|date=December 23, 2002|website=The National Security Archive}}</ref> The operation lasted one month before being called off.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3" />{{Campaignbox Vietnam War}}
Preparations were made to send a squadron of 18 [[Boeing B-52 Stratofortress|B-52s, flying in sorties of 6 bombers at a time]], of the [[92nd Strategic Aerospace Wing]] loaded with [[nuclear weapon]]s to fly over northern Alaska in the direction of the Soviet Union. It was hoped that this would convince the Soviets that Nixon was willing to resort to nuclear war in order to win the [[Vietnam War]]. The squadron took off on October 27 and flew towards the Soviet Union.<ref name=":1">{{cite journal |last1=Sagan |first1=Scott |last2=Suri |first2=Jeremi |date=2003 |title=The Madman Nuclear Alert: Secrecy, Signaling, and Safety in October 1969 |journal=International Security |volume=27 |issue=4 |pages=150–183 |doi=10.1162/016228803321951126 |jstor=4137607 |s2cid=57564244 |url=https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/madman-nuclear-alert-secrecy-signaling-and-safety-october-1969 }}</ref><ref name=":2">{{cite journal |last1=Burr |first1=William |last2=Kimball |first2=Jeffrey |date=2003 |title=Nixon's Nuclear Ploy |journal=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists |volume=59 |issue=1 |pages=28–73 |doi=10.2968/059001011 |via=Taylor & Francis Online}}</ref> Actions were designed to be detectable by the Soviets.<ref name=":0">{{cite book |title=63 Documents The Government Doesn't Want You To Read |author=[[Jesse Ventura]] |date=4 April 2011 |publisher=[[Skyhorse Publishing]], 2011 |isbn=978-1-61608-226-0 |page=[https://archive.org/details/63documentsgover00vent/page/170 170] |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/63documentsgover00vent/page/170}}</ref> Nixon cancelled the operation on October 30.<ref name=":9" />

The plan was part of Nixon's [[madman theory]],<ref name=":0" /> a concept based on [[game theory]],<ref name=":9" /> and its details remained unknown to the public until [[Freedom of Information Act (United States)|Freedom of Information Act]] requests in the 2000s revealed documents about the operation.<ref name=":3">{{cite web |title=Nixon's Nuclear Ploy: The Vietnam Negotiations and the Joint Chiefs of Staff Readiness Test |url=https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB81/ |last1=Burr |first1=William |last2=Kimball |first2=Jeffry |date=December 23, 2002 |website=The National Security Archive}}</ref>


==Background==
==Background==


=== State of the Vietnam War ===
=== State of the Vietnam War ===
Tensions from the Vietnam war remained high and served as a large catalyst behind Nixon's deployment of the operation.<ref name=":4">{{Cite book|last=Delpech|first=Therese|title=Nuclear Deterrence in the 21st Century: Lessons from the Cold War for a New Era of Strategic Piracy|publisher=RAND Corporation|year=2012|location=Santa Monica|jstor=10.7249/mg1103rc|isbn=9780833059307}}</ref> The war was one of Nixon's primary objectives in his entrance to the office and led to Nixon devising a plan to both end the Vietnam war and gain international and domestic credibility for the United States as a result.<ref name=":4" /> By launching an offensive being Operation Giant Lance, Nixon aimed to increase tensions within the war by raising the United States' nuclear threat through a "show of force" alert.<ref name=":1" /> These operations acted as a prequel to Nixon's eventual [[Duck Hook|Operation Duck Hook]], declassified in 2005.<ref name=":4" /> The primary goal of these operations was to primarily pressure the Soviets in Moscow, to call upon peace terms favourable for the United States with Hanoi in Vietnam.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /> With Operation Duck Hook being declassified in 2005, it was revealed that the "show of force" alert including Operation Giant Lance was meant to prepare for any military confrontation from the Soviets.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":4" />
Vietnam War tensions were high and were a major driver of Nixon's decision to initiate the operation.<ref name=":4">{{cite book |last=Delpech |first=Therese |title=Nuclear Deterrence in the 21st Century: Lessons from the Cold War for a New Era of Strategic Piracy |publisher=RAND Corporation |year=2012 |location=Santa Monica |jstor=10.7249/mg1103rc |isbn=9780833059307}}</ref> The war was one of the primary challenges Nixon sought to address on becoming president, and led to him devising a plan to both end the war and gain international and domestic credibility for the United States as a result.<ref name=":4" /> By launching Operation Giant Lance, Nixon aimed to increase war tensions by raising the United States' nuclear threat through a "show of force" alert.<ref name=":1" /> These operations acted as a prequel to Nixon's eventual [[Duck Hook|Operation Duck Hook]], which was declassified in 2005.<ref name=":4" /> The primary goal of these operations was to pressure the Soviets to get their North Vietnamese ally to agree to peace terms favorable to the United States.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" />


=== Preparation ===
=== Preparation ===
Earle Wheeler, a United States Army general, ordered the operation as a part of the raised nuclear alert.<ref name=":2" /> Under secrecy, Operation Giant Lance was a part of numerous escalations of nuclear threat, launched according to Nixon and Wheeler's decision to initiate a "Show of Force" alert on the 10th of October 1969.<ref name=":2" /> This was a series of operations to increase military pressure, including the airborne Operation Giant Lance.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":0" /> Initiated on October 13, eighteen B-52 bomber aircraft were deployed in preparation for the operation, requiring accompanying KC-135 tankers to refuel and support the extended patrol of the squadron.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /> To prepare for the operation, the Strategic Air Command (SAC) were used to collaboratively deploy the aircraft from air bases both in California and Washington State in secrecy.<ref name=":1" /> Further increasing the readiness of the bombers, the aircraft were checked throughout the day, standing by for immediate deployment.<ref name=":2" />
[[Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff]] [[Earle Wheeler]] ordered the operation as a part of the [[Joint Chiefs of Staff Readiness Test#:~:text=Carried out at the direction,help end the Vietnam War.|Joint Chiefs of Staff Readiness Test]]<ref name=":2" /> On 27 October 1969, eighteen B-52 bomber aircraft began the operation, accompanied by KC-135 tankers to refuel and support the extended patrol of the squadron. The bombers flew in sorties of 6 bombers at a time.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /> The U.S. Strategic Air Command (SAC) was used to deploy the aircraft from air bases both in California and Washington State in secrecy.<ref name=":1" /> The bombers were checked throughout the day, standing by for immediate deployment.<ref name=":2" />


== Purpose ==
== Purpose ==
The purpose of Operation Giant Lance was to intimidate the foreign contenders in the Vietnam War, primarily the Soviets through a display of radical military escalation. By using seemingly irrational actions as a part of Nixon's madman diplomacy, he aimed to push both the Soviet and the Vietnamese to end the war on favourable terms. This operation utilised a squadron of eighteen B-52 bomber aircraft which poised an extreme nuclear threat. These bombers were to patrol the Northern polar ice caps to survey the frozen terrain, whilst armed with nuclear weaponry.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":4" /><ref name=":0" /> The patrols consisted of eighteen-hour long vigils, which were executed with the intention of appearing as suspicious movements from the US.<ref name=":2" /> These movements were kept secret from the public, whilst also remaining intentionally detectable to the Soviet Union's intelligence systems.<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":2" /> The operation was also intended to be a precautionary measure boasting operational readiness in case of military retaliation from either East Asia or Russia.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":4" /><ref name=":3" /> The operation's intended goal was also to directly support project Duck Hook as a part of the 'Show of Force' alert. Nixon believed that this would indirectly coerce Moscow and Hanoi to enter a peace treaty through the Paris peace talks with the Soviets, on terms that were advantageous to the United States.<ref name=":2" /> This outcome was also thought to possibly benefit the United States as well by promoting the credibility of the United States intervention in the Sino-Soviet conflict to its general public in the war.<ref name=":5">{{Cite journal|last=Cressman|first=Dale|date=July 28, 2015|title=The Great Silent Majority: Nixon's 1969 Speech on Vietnamization|journal=Presidential Studies Quarterly|volume=45|issue=3|pages=144|doi=10.1111/psq.12214}}</ref>
The purpose of Operation Giant Lance and the [[Joint Chiefs of Staff Readiness Test#:~:text=Carried out at the direction,help end the Vietnam War.|Joint Chiefs of Staff Readiness Test]] of which it was a component was to intimidate the foreign contenders in the Vietnam War, primarily the Soviets, through a world-wide alert of U.S. nuclear and non-nuclear forces. By using seemingly irrational actions as a part of Nixon's madman diplomacy, he aimed to push both the Soviet and the Vietnamese to end the war on favourable terms. The squadron of eighteen B-52 bomber aircraft was to patrol the Northern polar ice cap to survey the frozen terrain whilst armed with nuclear weaponry.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":4" /><ref name=":0" /> The patrols consisted of eighteen-hour long vigils, which were intended to appear as suspicious movements by the U.S.<ref name=":2" /> These movements were kept secret from the public, whilst also remaining intentionally detectable to the Soviet Union's intelligence systems.<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":2" />
The operation was also intended to be a precautionary measure, boasting operational readiness in case of military retaliation from either East Asia or Russia.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":4" /><ref name=":3" /> The operation's intended goal was also to directly support Operation Duck Hook as a part of the "show of force" alert. Nixon believed that this would coerce Moscow and Hanoi into a peace treaty through the Paris peace talks with the Soviets, on terms that were advantageous to the United States.<ref name=":2" /> This outcome was also thought to possibly benefit the United States as well by promoting the credibility of the United States intervention in the [[Sino-Soviet conflict]] to its general public in the war.<ref name=":5">{{cite journal |last=Cressman |first=Dale |date=July 28, 2015 |title=The Great Silent Majority: Nixon's 1969 Speech on Vietnamization |journal=Presidential Studies Quarterly |volume=45 |issue=3 |pages=144 |doi=10.1111/psq.12214}}</ref>


== Madman theory ==
== Madman theory ==
President Richard Nixon was infamous for his radical measures which heavily influenced his diplomatic course of actions.<ref name=":5" /> The radicality of sending eighteen armed bombers on patrol stemmed from Nixon's intention to pressure foreign forces by displaying extreme military prowess.<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":1" /> [[Henry Kissinger]], the national security advisor, was advised by Nixon at this time about Nixon's willingness to use nuclear weapons in order to end the war.<ref name=":4" /> This madman theory attributed president Nixon with a type of diplomacy in which he would often take irrational options, even to the United States' own authorities.<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":0" /> This perception allows foreign forces to be unable to predict Nixon's intended motives or whether he would execute his actions, allowing Nixon to have a unique strategic advantage.<ref name=":6">{{Cite journal|last=McManus|first=Roseanne|date=September 13, 2019|title=Revisiting the Madman Theory: Evaluating the Impact of Different Forms of Perceived Madness in Coercive Bargaining|journal=Security Studies|volume=28|issue=5|pages=976–1009|doi=10.1080/09636412.2019.1662482|s2cid=203470748}}</ref> This diplomacy served as an indirect threat coupled with Nixon's decision to raise the nuclear alert, as the Soviets would not be able to completely understand his course of action.<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":2" /> Nixon used this unpredictable diplomacy to end the war in Vietnam, specifically constructing the impression he was willing to take desperate measures and irrationally threaten enemy forces with the United States' excessive nuclear threat.<ref name=":2" /> This would result in an increased possibility that they may abide by the United States' demands on the basis that Nixon would declare nuclear warfare if his threats were not complied with.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":6" /> The operations elevating the nuclear threat would also act as a display of Nixon's reputability as a tough and "mad" leader.<ref name=":2" /> This was intended to lead both the North Vietnamese and Soviets that he was indeed an irrational leader, capable of escalating the nuclear threat.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":4" />
President Richard Nixon was infamous for radical measures as part of his diplomacy.<ref name=":5" /> The radicality of sending eighteen armed bombers on patrol was designed to pressure foreign powers by displaying extreme military aggression.<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":1" /> Nixon told [[Henry Kissinger]], the national security advisor, that he was willing to use nuclear weapons in order to end the war.<ref name=":4" /> Following so-called madman theory, Nixon would often take diplomatic options that seemed irrational even to the United States' own authorities.<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":0" /> The idea was to make it impossible for foreign powers to determine Nixon's motives or predict his actions, giving him a unique strategic advantage.<ref name=":6">{{cite journal |last=McManus |first=Roseanne |date=September 13, 2019 |title=Revisiting the Madman Theory: Evaluating the Impact of Different Forms of Perceived Madness in Coercive Bargaining |journal=Security Studies |volume=28 |issue=5 |pages=976–1009 |doi=10.1080/09636412.2019.1662482 |s2cid=203470748}}</ref> This diplomacy, coupled with Nixon's decision to raise the nuclear alert, served as an indirect threat as the Soviets would not be able to understand his actions.<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":2" />

Nixon used this unpredictable diplomacy in a failed attempt to end the war in Vietnam, creating the impression he was willing to take desperate measures including using the United States' nuclear weapons.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":6" /> These actions would also enhance Nixon's reputation as a tough and "mad" leader.<ref name=":2" /> The intention was to cause the North Vietnamese and the Soviets to believe that he was an irrational leader, capable of escalating the nuclear threat.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":4" /> The policy failed to produce the concessions desired by the United States.


Due to Nixon's history of enacting this diplomacy such as the Cuban Missile Crisis, the threat of his "madman" actions served as a real warning as he was socially recognised as a madman figure.<ref name=":1" /> This diplomacy was effective during the Vietnam war due to the growing fear over the usage of nuclear warfare, amplified by the numerous 'Show of Force' operations.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":6" /> Although this diplomacy could have been passed off to foreign forces as a bluff, the risk of uncertainty to them is much larger than the risk to the United States.<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":4" /> Ultimately, Nixon possessed an objective advantage as the US could gauge the effectiveness of their threats based on the reactionary implications of both the Soviets and Vietnamese.<ref name=":6" />
Nixon's "madman" diplomacy was in effect briefly during the Vietnam War, amplified by the numerous "show of force" operations.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":6" /> Although this diplomacy could have been seen by opposing states as a bluff, the risk of uncertainty to them was much larger than the risk to the United States.<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":4" /> Ultimately, Nixon possessed an advantage as the US could gauge the effectiveness of its threats based on the reactions of the Soviets and the Vietnamese.<ref name=":6" />


== Implications ==
== Implications ==


=== Giant Lance's success ===
=== Effects of the operation ===
The operation did not directly cause any obvious, significant change due to its cancellation; the impact it may have had on the Soviets or the Vietnamese cannot be accurately measured.<ref name=":2" /> The operation was terminated on October 30 suddenly without any known reason.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":0" /> The abrupt halt to the operation may have been due to the fact that the Soviets did not show any significant changes in their actions, which could be speculated that the Soviets suspected Nixon of his bluffs, thus undermining the overall success of the operation.<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":2" /> However, other historians have argued that the sudden withdrawal of the SAC's squadron was an intentional effort to display the maneuverability and freedom the US possessed when it came to nuclear warfare.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Suri|first=Jeremi|date=25 February 2008|title=The Nukes of October: Richard Nixon's Secret Plan to Bring Peace to Vietnam|magazine=WIRED|url=https://www.wired.com/2008/02/ff-nuclearwar/}}</ref>
The operation did not directly cause any obvious, significant change due to its cancellation; the impact it may have had on the Soviets or the Vietnamese cannot be accurately measured.<ref name=":2" /> The operation was terminated on October 30 suddenly without any known reason.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":0" /> The abrupt halt to the operation may have been due to the fact that the Soviets did not show any significant changes in their actions, which may mean that the Soviets suspected Nixon of bluffing.<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":2" /> However, some historians have argued that the sudden withdrawal of the SAC's squadron was an intentional effort to display the maneuverability and freedom the US possessed when it came to nuclear warfare.<ref name=":9" />


Operation Giant Lance would later be revealed to be a tool in terms of escalating the nuclear threat towards the Soviets and North Vietnamese.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> Giant Lance was intended to jar foreign forces into favourable diplomatic agreements to end the war, before it led to Nixon's decision to carry out Operation Duck Hook.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> Despite the operation ending as a bluff tactic, the operation served to add credibility both to Nixon's madman threats and the proactiveness of the US.<ref name=":2" /> Despite this, this may have not amounted to much success due to the large anti-war movement at the time, which served as a large catalyst to the reprieve of the nuclear operations.<ref name=":7">{{Cite book|last1=Stone|first1=Oliver|title=The untold history of the United States|last2=Kuznick|first2=Peter|publisher=Gallery Books|year=2012|location=New York|pages=364}}</ref><ref name=":1" /> Seymour Hersh, a modern journalist, believed that the operation also served as an underlying offensive to Operation Duck Hook, in case Nixon decided to carry out the mining and bombing operation.<ref name=":2" />
Operation Giant Lance was intended to jar foreign forces into favourable diplomatic agreements to end the war, to avoid Nixon ordering Operation Duck Hook.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> Despite the operation ending as a bluff tactic, the operation served to add credibility both to Nixon's madman threats and the proactiveness of the U.S.<ref name=":2" /> However this may not have been successful due to the large anti-war movement at the time, which tended to discourage nuclear operations.<ref name=":7">{{cite book |last1=Stone |first1=Oliver |title=The untold history of the United States |last2=Kuznick |first2=Peter |publisher=Gallery Books |year=2012 |location=New York |pages=364}}</ref><ref name=":1" /> Seymour Hersh believed that the operation also served as an adjunct to Operation Duck Hook, a proposed mining and bombing operation against North Vietnam.<ref name=":2" />


In response to the patrols from Giant Lance, the Soviets showed no clear reactionary actions.<ref name=":2" /> Whilst there may not have been a direct response to Operation Giant Lance, there was a reaction from the Soviet intelligence due to the sudden heightened nuclear alert.<ref name=":1" /> This was effectively the goal of the operation, to remain publicly secretive but expose the movements purposely to the Soviet intelligence.<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":2" /> Moscow did not undertake any steps towards the US despite this.<ref name=":2" /> Roger Dingman speculated that whilst the Soviets showed no reaction, the threat and Nixon's madman diplomacy may have impacted both the decisions of the Soviets and Vietnamese. The lack of any retaliation may be due to Nixon's history of his bluffs attributed to the madman diplomacy, in which previous nuclear alert threats such as the DEFCON alert initiated during the Cuban Missile Crisis served as a missile scare.<ref name=":2" /> In October 1973, a soviet official exclaimed that "Mr. Nixon used to exaggerate his intentions regularly. He used alerts and leaks to do this", which may have driven the avoidance of the US operational threat.<ref name=":2" />
The Soviets showed no clear reaction in response to the Giant Lance patrols.<ref name=":2" /> Whilst there may not have been a direct response to the operation, there was a reaction from Soviet intelligence: a sudden heightened nuclear alert.<ref name=":1" /> This was the goal of the operation: to make the operation visible to Soviet intelligence whilst hiding it from the American public.<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":2" /> The Soviets may have seen Nixon's move simply as a bluff.<ref name=":2" /> In October 1973, a Soviet official exclaimed that "Mr. Nixon used to exaggerate his intentions regularly. He used alerts and leaks to do this", which may have caused the U.S. operational threat to be ignored.<ref name=":2" />


=== Social perception to nuclear warfare ===
=== Perception of U.S. nuclear threat ===
Although both Moscow and Hanoi did not show any reaction or impact of Operation Giant Lance, the uncertainty of Nixon's nuclear power posed a significant threat.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":6" /> As Nixon was socially recognised as a "madman", the risk of Nixon's continuous nuclear threat towards Hanoi was undermined by the anti-war sentiment on US home soil.<ref name=":7" /> This implied to Hanoi that the US did not wish for further war, or risk of nuclear warfare.<ref name=":7" /> The heightened fear of nuclear warfare brought upon a shared parity of nuclear avoidance across all participants of the war.<ref name=":1" /> Neither participant willed a military confrontation that would escalate to that level, exemplifying the significance and extreme measures of Nixon's "mad" actions in social perceptions at the time.<ref name=":1" />
Although both Moscow and Hanoi did not show any reaction to Operation Giant Lance and the [[Joint Chiefs of Staff Readiness Test#:~:text=Carried out at the direction,help end the Vietnam War.|Joint Chiefs of Staff Readiness Test]], the uncertainty of Nixon's nuclear power posed a significant threat.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":6" /> Nixon's continuous nuclear threat towards Hanoi was undermined by the anti-war sentiment on U.S. home soil.<ref name=":7" /> This implied to Hanoi that the U.S. did not wish for further war, or to risk nuclear warfare.<ref name=":7" /> The heightened fear of nuclear warfare caused a shared parity of nuclear avoidance across all participants in the war.<ref name=":1" /> Neither side wanted a military confrontation that would escalate to that level.<ref name=":1" />


There also existed the political danger of nuclear reliance in terms of war, with increased usage of nuclear weaponry as a threat, other international governments would begin to accept this as the norm.<ref name=":8">{{Cite book|last=Schelling|first=Thomas|title=The Strategy of Conflict|publisher=Harvard University Press|date=May 15, 1981|isbn=9780674840317|location=Cambridge, Massachusetts|pages=187–203}}</ref><ref name=":1" /> Nuclear fear would bring the possibility of increased nuclear use both offensively and defensively as a means of protecting themselves, engaging or retaliating in military engagements.<ref name=":7" /><ref name=":1" /> Continual development of nuclear technology and reliance would inevitably lead to increasing overall paranoia and risk of danger.<ref name=":1" /> Military escalation could lead to catastrophic implications, as the presence of nuclear warfare allows for “the threat that leaves something to chance”.<ref name=":8" /><ref name=":1" />
There also existed the danger that excessive reliance on the nuclear threat in times of war would cause other governments to begin to accept this as the norm.<ref name=":8">{{cite book |last=Schelling |first=Thomas |title=The Strategy of Conflict |publisher=Harvard University Press |date=May 15, 1981 |isbn=9780674840317 |location=Cambridge, Massachusetts |pages=187–203}}</ref><ref name=":1" /> Nuclear fear might bring the possibility of increased nuclear use.<ref name=":7" /><ref name=":1" /> Continual development of nuclear technology and reliance thereon would inevitably lead to increasing paranoia.<ref name=":1" /> Military escalation could lead to “the threat that leaves something to chance”.<ref name=":8" /><ref name=":1" />


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 22:34, 3 October 2024

Operation "Giant Lance"
Part of the Cold War
DateOctober 10–30, 1969
Location
Over Arctic Ocean
Result Inconclusive
Belligerents
 United States  Soviet Union
 North Vietnam
Commanders and leaders
United States Richard Nixon Soviet Union Leonid Brezhnev

Operation Giant Lance was a secret U.S. nuclear alert operation by the United States that the Strategic Air Command carried out in late October 1969.[1] Giant Lance was one component of a multi-pronged military exercise, the Joint Chiefs of Staff Readiness Test that the Joint Chiefs developed and carried out during October 1969 in response to White House orders. On October 10, 1969, on the advice of National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger, U.S. President Richard Nixon issued the order for the readiness test that led to Giant Lance.

Preparations were made to send a squadron of 18 B-52s, flying in sorties of 6 bombers at a time, of the 92nd Strategic Aerospace Wing loaded with nuclear weapons to fly over northern Alaska in the direction of the Soviet Union. It was hoped that this would convince the Soviets that Nixon was willing to resort to nuclear war in order to win the Vietnam War. The squadron took off on October 27 and flew towards the Soviet Union.[2][3] Actions were designed to be detectable by the Soviets.[4] Nixon cancelled the operation on October 30.[1]

The plan was part of Nixon's madman theory,[4] a concept based on game theory,[1] and its details remained unknown to the public until Freedom of Information Act requests in the 2000s revealed documents about the operation.[5]

Background

[edit]

State of the Vietnam War

[edit]

Vietnam War tensions were high and were a major driver of Nixon's decision to initiate the operation.[6] The war was one of the primary challenges Nixon sought to address on becoming president, and led to him devising a plan to both end the war and gain international and domestic credibility for the United States as a result.[6] By launching Operation Giant Lance, Nixon aimed to increase war tensions by raising the United States' nuclear threat through a "show of force" alert.[2] These operations acted as a prequel to Nixon's eventual Operation Duck Hook, which was declassified in 2005.[6] The primary goal of these operations was to pressure the Soviets to get their North Vietnamese ally to agree to peace terms favorable to the United States.[4][2]

Preparation

[edit]

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Earle Wheeler ordered the operation as a part of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Readiness Test[3] On 27 October 1969, eighteen B-52 bomber aircraft began the operation, accompanied by KC-135 tankers to refuel and support the extended patrol of the squadron. The bombers flew in sorties of 6 bombers at a time.[4][2] The U.S. Strategic Air Command (SAC) was used to deploy the aircraft from air bases both in California and Washington State in secrecy.[2] The bombers were checked throughout the day, standing by for immediate deployment.[3]

Purpose

[edit]

The purpose of Operation Giant Lance and the Joint Chiefs of Staff Readiness Test of which it was a component was to intimidate the foreign contenders in the Vietnam War, primarily the Soviets, through a world-wide alert of U.S. nuclear and non-nuclear forces. By using seemingly irrational actions as a part of Nixon's madman diplomacy, he aimed to push both the Soviet and the Vietnamese to end the war on favourable terms. The squadron of eighteen B-52 bomber aircraft was to patrol the Northern polar ice cap to survey the frozen terrain whilst armed with nuclear weaponry.[3][6][4] The patrols consisted of eighteen-hour long vigils, which were intended to appear as suspicious movements by the U.S.[3] These movements were kept secret from the public, whilst also remaining intentionally detectable to the Soviet Union's intelligence systems.[5][3]

The operation was also intended to be a precautionary measure, boasting operational readiness in case of military retaliation from either East Asia or Russia.[3][6][5] The operation's intended goal was also to directly support Operation Duck Hook as a part of the "show of force" alert. Nixon believed that this would coerce Moscow and Hanoi into a peace treaty through the Paris peace talks with the Soviets, on terms that were advantageous to the United States.[3] This outcome was also thought to possibly benefit the United States as well by promoting the credibility of the United States intervention in the Sino-Soviet conflict to its general public in the war.[7]

Madman theory

[edit]

President Richard Nixon was infamous for radical measures as part of his diplomacy.[7] The radicality of sending eighteen armed bombers on patrol was designed to pressure foreign powers by displaying extreme military aggression.[6][2] Nixon told Henry Kissinger, the national security advisor, that he was willing to use nuclear weapons in order to end the war.[6] Following so-called madman theory, Nixon would often take diplomatic options that seemed irrational even to the United States' own authorities.[6][4] The idea was to make it impossible for foreign powers to determine Nixon's motives or predict his actions, giving him a unique strategic advantage.[8] This diplomacy, coupled with Nixon's decision to raise the nuclear alert, served as an indirect threat as the Soviets would not be able to understand his actions.[6][3]

Nixon used this unpredictable diplomacy in a failed attempt to end the war in Vietnam, creating the impression he was willing to take desperate measures including using the United States' nuclear weapons.[3][2][8] These actions would also enhance Nixon's reputation as a tough and "mad" leader.[3] The intention was to cause the North Vietnamese and the Soviets to believe that he was an irrational leader, capable of escalating the nuclear threat.[3][6] The policy failed to produce the concessions desired by the United States.

Nixon's "madman" diplomacy was in effect briefly during the Vietnam War, amplified by the numerous "show of force" operations.[2][8] Although this diplomacy could have been seen by opposing states as a bluff, the risk of uncertainty to them was much larger than the risk to the United States.[8][6] Ultimately, Nixon possessed an advantage as the US could gauge the effectiveness of its threats based on the reactions of the Soviets and the Vietnamese.[8]

Implications

[edit]

Effects of the operation

[edit]

The operation did not directly cause any obvious, significant change due to its cancellation; the impact it may have had on the Soviets or the Vietnamese cannot be accurately measured.[3] The operation was terminated on October 30 suddenly without any known reason.[3][4] The abrupt halt to the operation may have been due to the fact that the Soviets did not show any significant changes in their actions, which may mean that the Soviets suspected Nixon of bluffing.[8][3] However, some historians have argued that the sudden withdrawal of the SAC's squadron was an intentional effort to display the maneuverability and freedom the US possessed when it came to nuclear warfare.[1]

Operation Giant Lance was intended to jar foreign forces into favourable diplomatic agreements to end the war, to avoid Nixon ordering Operation Duck Hook.[2][3] Despite the operation ending as a bluff tactic, the operation served to add credibility both to Nixon's madman threats and the proactiveness of the U.S.[3] However this may not have been successful due to the large anti-war movement at the time, which tended to discourage nuclear operations.[9][2] Seymour Hersh believed that the operation also served as an adjunct to Operation Duck Hook, a proposed mining and bombing operation against North Vietnam.[3]

The Soviets showed no clear reaction in response to the Giant Lance patrols.[3] Whilst there may not have been a direct response to the operation, there was a reaction from Soviet intelligence: a sudden heightened nuclear alert.[2] This was the goal of the operation: to make the operation visible to Soviet intelligence whilst hiding it from the American public.[5][3] The Soviets may have seen Nixon's move simply as a bluff.[3] In October 1973, a Soviet official exclaimed that "Mr. Nixon used to exaggerate his intentions regularly. He used alerts and leaks to do this", which may have caused the U.S. operational threat to be ignored.[3]

Perception of U.S. nuclear threat

[edit]

Although both Moscow and Hanoi did not show any reaction to Operation Giant Lance and the Joint Chiefs of Staff Readiness Test, the uncertainty of Nixon's nuclear power posed a significant threat.[3][8] Nixon's continuous nuclear threat towards Hanoi was undermined by the anti-war sentiment on U.S. home soil.[9] This implied to Hanoi that the U.S. did not wish for further war, or to risk nuclear warfare.[9] The heightened fear of nuclear warfare caused a shared parity of nuclear avoidance across all participants in the war.[2] Neither side wanted a military confrontation that would escalate to that level.[2]

There also existed the danger that excessive reliance on the nuclear threat in times of war would cause other governments to begin to accept this as the norm.[10][2] Nuclear fear might bring the possibility of increased nuclear use.[9][2] Continual development of nuclear technology and reliance thereon would inevitably lead to increasing paranoia.[2] Military escalation could lead to “the threat that leaves something to chance”.[10][2]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d Suri, Jeremi (2008-02-25). "The Nukes of October: Richard Nixon's Secret Plan to Bring Peace to Vietnam". Wired Magazine. Retrieved 2012-01-28.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Sagan, Scott; Suri, Jeremi (2003). "The Madman Nuclear Alert: Secrecy, Signaling, and Safety in October 1969". International Security. 27 (4): 150–183. doi:10.1162/016228803321951126. JSTOR 4137607. S2CID 57564244.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w Burr, William; Kimball, Jeffrey (2003). "Nixon's Nuclear Ploy". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 59 (1): 28–73. doi:10.2968/059001011 – via Taylor & Francis Online.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g Jesse Ventura (4 April 2011). 63 Documents The Government Doesn't Want You To Read. Skyhorse Publishing, 2011. p. 170. ISBN 978-1-61608-226-0.
  5. ^ a b c d Burr, William; Kimball, Jeffry (December 23, 2002). "Nixon's Nuclear Ploy: The Vietnam Negotiations and the Joint Chiefs of Staff Readiness Test". The National Security Archive.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Delpech, Therese (2012). Nuclear Deterrence in the 21st Century: Lessons from the Cold War for a New Era of Strategic Piracy. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. ISBN 9780833059307. JSTOR 10.7249/mg1103rc.
  7. ^ a b Cressman, Dale (July 28, 2015). "The Great Silent Majority: Nixon's 1969 Speech on Vietnamization". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 45 (3): 144. doi:10.1111/psq.12214.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g McManus, Roseanne (September 13, 2019). "Revisiting the Madman Theory: Evaluating the Impact of Different Forms of Perceived Madness in Coercive Bargaining". Security Studies. 28 (5): 976–1009. doi:10.1080/09636412.2019.1662482. S2CID 203470748.
  9. ^ a b c d Stone, Oliver; Kuznick, Peter (2012). The untold history of the United States. New York: Gallery Books. p. 364.
  10. ^ a b Schelling, Thomas (May 15, 1981). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. pp. 187–203. ISBN 9780674840317.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Operation_Giant_Lance&oldid=1249244467"