Join (topology): Difference between revisions
Erel Segal (talk | contribs) |
m fix spacing around math (via WP:JWB) |
||
(40 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:Join.svg|right|thumb|Geometric join of two [[line segment]]s. The original spaces are shown in green and blue. The join is a three-dimensional solid in gray.]] |
[[Image:Join.svg|right|thumb|Geometric join of two [[line segment]]s. The original spaces are shown in green and blue. The join is a three-dimensional solid, a [[disphenoid]], in gray.]] |
||
In [[topology]], a field of [[mathematics]], the '''join''' of two [[topological space]]s <math>A</math> and <math>B</math>, often denoted by <math>A\ast B</math> or <math>A\star B</math>, is a topological space formed by taking the [[disjoint union (topology)|disjoint union]] of the two spaces, and attaching line segments joining every point in <math>A</math> to every point in <math>B</math>. |
In [[topology]], a field of [[mathematics]], the '''join''' of two [[topological space]]s <math>A</math> and <math>B</math>, often denoted by <math>A\ast B</math> or <math>A\star B</math>, is a topological space formed by taking the [[disjoint union (topology)|disjoint union]] of the two spaces, and attaching line segments joining every point in <math>A</math> to every point in <math>B</math>. The join of a space <math>A</math> with itself is denoted by <math>A^{\star 2} := A\star A</math>. The join is defined in slightly different ways in different contexts |
||
== |
== Geometric sets == |
||
⚫ | If <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> are subsets of the [[Euclidean space]] <math>\mathbb{R}^n</math>, then:<ref>{{Cite book |last=Colin P. Rourke and Brian J. Sanderson |url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-81735-9 |title=Introduction to Piecewise-Linear Topology |publisher=Springer-Verlag |year=1982 |location=New York |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-3-642-81735-9|isbn=978-3-540-11102-3 }}</ref>{{Rp|page=1}}<blockquote><math> A\star B\ :=\ \{ t\cdot a + (1-t)\cdot b ~|~ a\in A, b\in B, t\in [0,1]\}</math>,</blockquote>that is, the set of all line-segments between a point in <math>A</math> and a point in <math>B</math>. |
||
The join is defined in slightly different ways in different contexts |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
Some authors<ref>{{Citation |last=Bryant |first=John L. |title=Chapter 5 - Piecewise Linear Topology |date=2001-01-01 |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780444824325500068 |work=Handbook of Geometric Topology |pages=219–259 |editor-last=Daverman |editor-first=R. J. |place=Amsterdam |publisher=North-Holland |language=en |isbn=978-0-444-82432-5 |access-date=2022-11-15 |editor2-last=Sher |editor2-first=R. B.}}</ref>{{Rp|page=5}} restrict the definition to subsets that are ''joinable'': any two different line-segments, connecting a point of A to a point of B, meet in at most a common endpoint (that is, they do not intersect in their interior). Every two subsets can be made "joinable". For example, if <math>A</math> is in <math>\mathbb{R}^n</math> and <math>B</math> is in <math>\mathbb{R}^m</math>, then <math>A\times\{ 0^m \}\times\{0\}</math> and <math>\{0^n \}\times B\times\{1\}</math> are joinable in <math>\mathbb{R}^{n+m+1}</math>. The figure above shows an example for m=n=1, where <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> are line-segments. |
Some authors<ref>{{Citation |last=Bryant |first=John L. |title=Chapter 5 - Piecewise Linear Topology |date=2001-01-01 |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780444824325500068 |work=Handbook of Geometric Topology |pages=219–259 |editor-last=Daverman |editor-first=R. J. |place=Amsterdam |publisher=North-Holland |language=en |isbn=978-0-444-82432-5 |access-date=2022-11-15 |editor2-last=Sher |editor2-first=R. B.}}</ref>{{Rp|page=5}} restrict the definition to subsets that are ''joinable'': any two different line-segments, connecting a point of A to a point of B, meet in at most a common endpoint (that is, they do not intersect in their interior). Every two subsets can be made "joinable". For example, if <math>A</math> is in <math>\mathbb{R}^n</math> and <math>B</math> is in <math>\mathbb{R}^m</math>, then <math>A\times\{ 0^m \}\times\{0\}</math> and <math>\{0^n \}\times B\times\{1\}</math> are joinable in <math>\mathbb{R}^{n+m+1}</math>. The figure above shows an example for m=n=1, where <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> are line-segments. |
||
=== |
=== Examples === |
||
⚫ | |||
Formally, the join is defined as |
|||
⚫ | |||
** The join of a point and an interval is a triangle (m=0, n=1). |
|||
⚫ | |||
** The join of a point and an (''n''-1)-dimensional [[simplex]] is an ''n''-dimensional simplex. |
|||
* The join of a point and a [[polygon]] (or any [[polytope]]) is a [[pyramid (geometry)|pyramid]], like the join of a point and square is a [[square pyramid]]. The join of a point and a [[cube]] is a [[cubic pyramid]]. |
|||
* The join of a point and a [[circle]] is a [[cone]], and the join of a point and a [[sphere]] is a [[hypercone]]. |
|||
⚫ | |||
If <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> are any topological spaces, then: |
|||
:<math> A\star B\ :=\ A\sqcup_{p_0}(A\times B \times [0,1])\sqcup_{p_1}B,</math> |
:<math> A\star B\ :=\ A\sqcup_{p_0}(A\times B \times [0,1])\sqcup_{p_1}B,</math> |
||
where the cylinder <math>A\times B \times [0,1]</math> is [[adjunction space|attached]] to the original spaces <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> along the natural projections of the faces of the cylinder: |
where the cylinder <math>A\times B \times [0,1]</math> is [[adjunction space|attached]] to the original spaces <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> along the natural projections of the faces of the cylinder: |
||
Line 17: | Line 23: | ||
:<math> {A\times B\times \{1\}} \xrightarrow{p_1} B.</math> |
:<math> {A\times B\times \{1\}} \xrightarrow{p_1} B.</math> |
||
Usually it is implicitly assumed that <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> are non-empty, in which case the definition is often phrased a bit differently: instead of attaching the faces of the cylinder <math>A\times B \times [0,1]</math> to the spaces <math>A</math> and <math>B</math>, these faces are simply collapsed in a way suggested by the attachment projections <math>p_1,p_2</math>: we form the [[Quotient space (topology)|quotient space]] |
|||
:<math> A\star B\ :=\ (A\times B \times [0,1] )/ \sim, </math> |
:<math> A\star B\ :=\ (A\times B \times [0,1] )/ \sim, </math> |
||
where the [[equivalence relation]] <math>\sim</math> is generated by |
where the [[equivalence relation]] <math>\sim</math> is generated by |
||
Line 25: | Line 31: | ||
At the endpoints, this collapses <math>A\times B\times \{0\}</math> to <math>A</math> and <math>A\times B\times \{1\}</math> to <math>B</math>. |
At the endpoints, this collapses <math>A\times B\times \{0\}</math> to <math>A</math> and <math>A\times B\times \{1\}</math> to <math>B</math>. |
||
If <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> are bounded subsets of the [[Euclidean space]] <math>\mathbb{R}^n</math>, and <math>A\subseteq U</math> and <math>B \subseteq V</math>, where <math>U, V</math> are disjoint subspaces of <math>\mathbb{R}^n</math> such that the dimension of their [[affine hull]] is <math>dim U + dim V + 1</math> (e.g. two non-intersecting non-parallel lines in <math>\mathbb{R}^3</math>), then the topological definition reduces to the geometric definition, that is, the "geometric join" is homeomorphic to the "topological join":''<ref name=":0" />''{{Rp|page=75|location=Prop.4.2.4}}<blockquote><math> \big((A\times B \times [0,1] )/ \sim\big) \simeq \{ t\cdot a + (1-t)\cdot b ~|~ a\in A, b\in B, t\in [0,1]\}</math></blockquote> |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
* The join of a space <math>X</math> with a one-point space is called the [[cone (topology)|cone]] <math>CX</math> of <math>X</math>. |
|||
* The join of a space <math>X</math> with <math>S^0</math> (the 0-dimensional [[sphere]], or, the [[discrete space]] with two points) is called the [[Suspension (topology)|suspension]] <math>SX</math> of <math>X</math>. |
|||
⚫ | |||
* The join of the spheres <math>S^n</math> and <math>S^m</math> is the sphere <math>S^{n+m+1}</math>. (If <math>x=(x_1,\ldots,x_{n+1})\in S^n </math> and <math>y=(y_1,\ldots,y_{m+1})\in S^m</math> are points on the respective unit spheres and the parameter <math>a\in[0,1]</math> describes the location of a point on the line segment joining <math>x</math> to <math>y</math>, then <math>z=(ax_1,\ldots,ax_{n+1},\sqrt{1-a^2}\;y_1,\ldots,\sqrt{1-a^2}\;y_{m+1})\in S^{n+m+1}</math>.) |
|||
* The join of two pairs of isolated points is a square (without interior). The join of a square with a third pair of isolated points is an [[octahedron]] (again, without interior). In general, the join of <math>n+1</math> pairs of isolated points is an <math>n</math>-dimensional [[octahedral sphere]]. |
|||
== |
== Abstract simplicial complexes == |
||
If <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> are any [[Abstract simplicial complex|abstract simplicial complexes]], then their '''join''' is an abstract simplicial complex defined as follows:''<ref name=":0" />''{{Rp|page=74|location=Def.4.2.1}} |
|||
* The vertex set <math> V(A\star B)</math> is a [[disjoint union]] of <math> V(A)</math> and <math> V( B)</math>. |
|||
* The simplices of <math> A\star B</math> are all [[disjoint union]]s of a simplex of <math>A</math> with a simplex of <math>B</math>: <math> A\star B := \{ a\sqcup b: a\in A, b\in B \}</math> (in the special case in which <math> V(A)</math> and <math> V( B)</math> are disjoint, the join is simply <math> \{ a\cup b: a\in A, b\in B \}</math>). |
|||
⚫ | |||
* Suppose <math>A = \{ \emptyset, \{a\} \}</math> and <math>B = \{\emptyset, \{b\} \}</math>, that is, two sets with a single point. Then <math>A \star B = \{ \emptyset, \{a\}, \{b\}, \{a,b\} \}</math>, which represents a line-segment. Note that the vertex sets of A and B are disjoint; otherwise, we should have made them disjoint. For example, <math>A^{\star 2} = A \star A = \{ \emptyset, \{a_1\}, \{a_2\}, \{a_1,a_2\} \}</math> where a<sub>1</sub> and a<sub>2</sub> are two copies of the single element in V(A). Topologically, the result is the same as <math>A \star B</math> - a line-segment. |
|||
* Suppose <math>A = \{ \emptyset, \{a\} \}</math> and <math>B = \{\emptyset, \{b\}, \{c\}, \{b,c\} \}</math>. Then <math>A \star B = P(\{a,b,c\})</math>, which represents a triangle. |
|||
* Suppose <math>A = \{ \emptyset, \{a\}, \{b\} \}</math> and <math>B = \{\emptyset, \{c\}, \{d\} \}</math>, that is, two sets with two discrete points. then <math>A\star B</math> is a complex with facets <math>\{a,c\}, \{b,c\}, \{a,d\}, \{b,d\} </math>, which represents a "square". |
|||
The combinatorial definition is equivalent to the topological definition in the following sense:''<ref name=":0" />''{{Rp|page=77|location=Exercise.3}} for every two abstract simplicial complexes <math>A</math> and <math>B</math>, <math> ||A\star B||</math> is [[Homeomorphism|homeomorphic]] to <math> ||A||\star ||B||</math>, where <math> ||X||</math> denotes any [[Abstract simplicial complex#Geometric realization|geometric realization]] of the complex <math> X</math>. |
|||
== Maps == |
|||
Given two maps <math> f:A_1\to A_2</math> and <math> g:B_1\to B_2</math>, their join <math> f\star g:A_1\star B_1 \to A_2\star B_2</math> is defined based on the representation of each point in the join <math> A_1\star B_1 </math> as <math> t\cdot a +(1-t)\cdot b</math>, for some <math> a\in A_1, b\in B_1</math>:''<ref name=":0" />''{{Rp|page=77|location=}}<blockquote><math> f\star g ~(t\cdot a +(1-t)\cdot b) ~~=~~ t\cdot f(a) + (1-t)\cdot g(b)</math></blockquote> |
|||
== Special cases == |
|||
The [[cone (topology)|'''cone''']] of a topological space <math>X</math>, denoted <math>CX</math> , is a join of <math>X</math> with a single point. |
|||
The [[Suspension (topology)|'''suspension''']] of a topological space <math>X</math>, denoted <math>SX</math> , is a join of <math>X</math> with <math>S^0</math> (the 0-dimensional [[sphere]], or, the [[discrete space]] with two points). |
|||
==Properties== |
==Properties== |
||
=== Commutativity |
=== Commutativity === |
||
The join of two spaces is commutative [[up to]] [[homeomorphism]], i.e. <math>A\star B\cong B\star A</math>. |
The join of two spaces is commutative [[up to]] [[homeomorphism]], i.e. <math>A\star B\cong B\star A</math>. |
||
=== Associativity === |
|||
⚫ | |||
It is ''not'' true that the join operation defined above is associative up to homeomorphism for arbitrary topological spaces. However, for [[Locally compact space|locally compact]] [[Hausdorff space|Hausdorff spaces]] <math>A, B, C</math> we have <math>(A\star B)\star C \cong A\star(B\star C).</math> Therefore, one can define the ''k''-times join of a space with itself, <math>A^{*k} := A * \cdots * A</math> (''k'' times). |
|||
: |
|||
⚫ | It is possible to define a different join operation <math>A\; \hat{\star}\;B</math> which uses the same underlying set as <math>A\star B</math> but a different topology, and this operation is associative for ''all'' topological spaces. For locally compact Hausdorff spaces <math>A</math> and <math>B</math>, the joins <math>A\star B</math> and <math>A \;\hat{\star}\;B</math> coincide.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Fomenko |first1=Anatoly |title=Homotopical Topology |last2=Fuchs |first2=Dmitry |publisher=Springer |year=2016 |edition=2nd |pages=20}}</ref> |
||
=== Homotopy equivalence === |
|||
If <math>A</math> and <math>A'</math> are [[Homotopy equivalence|homotopy equivalent]], then <math>A\star B</math> and <math>A'\star B</math> are homotopy equivalent too.''<ref name=":0" />''{{Rp|page=77|location=Exercise.2}} |
|||
=== Reduced join === |
=== Reduced join === |
||
Line 55: | Line 74: | ||
=== Homotopical connectivity === |
=== Homotopical connectivity === |
||
Given two [[Triangulable space|triangulable spaces]] '''<math>A, B</math>''', the [[homotopical connectivity]] (<math>\eta_{\pi}</math>) of their join is at least the sum of connectivities of its parts:''<ref name=":0">{{Cite Matousek 2007}}, Section 4.3</ref>''{{Rp|page=81|location=Prop.4.4.3}} |
|||
* '''<math>\eta_{\pi}(A*B) \geq \eta_{\pi}(A)+\eta_{\pi}(B)</math>'''. |
* '''<math>\eta_{\pi}(A*B) \geq \eta_{\pi}(A)+\eta_{\pi}(B)</math>'''. |
||
As an example, let '''<math>A = B = S^0</math>''' be a set of two disconnected points. There is a 1-dimensional hole between the points, so <math>\eta_{\pi}(A)=\eta_{\pi}(B)=1</math>. The join '''<math>A * B </math>''' is a square, which is homeomorphic to a circle that has a 2-dimensional hole, so <math>\eta_{\pi}(A * B)=2</math>. The join of this square with a third copy of <math>S^0 </math> is a [[octahedron]], which is homeomorphic to '''<math>S^2 </math> ''', whose hole is 3-dimensional. In general, the join of ''n'' copies of '''<math>S^0 </math>''' is homeomorphic to '''<math>S^{n-1} </math> ''' and <math>\eta_{\pi}(S^{n-1})=n</math>. |
As an example, let '''<math>A = B = S^0</math>''' be a set of two disconnected points. There is a 1-dimensional hole between the points, so <math>\eta_{\pi}(A)=\eta_{\pi}(B)=1</math>. The join '''<math>A * B </math>''' is a square, which is homeomorphic to a circle that has a 2-dimensional hole, so <math>\eta_{\pi}(A * B)=2</math>. The join of this square with a third copy of <math>S^0 </math> is a [[octahedron]], which is homeomorphic to '''<math>S^2 </math> ''', whose hole is 3-dimensional. In general, the join of ''n'' copies of '''<math>S^0 </math>''' is homeomorphic to '''<math>S^{n-1} </math> ''' and <math>\eta_{\pi}(S^{n-1})=n</math>. |
||
== Deleted join == |
|||
The '''deleted join''' of an abstract complex ''A'' is an abstract complex containing all [[disjoint unions]] of ''disjoint'' faces of ''A'':''<ref name=":0" />''{{Rp|location=|page=112}}<blockquote><math> A^{*2}_{\Delta} := \{ a_1\sqcup a_2: a_1,a_2\in A, a_1\cap a_2 = \emptyset \}</math></blockquote> |
|||
=== Examples === |
|||
* Suppose <math>A = \{ \emptyset, \{a\} \}</math> (a single point). Then <math> A^{*2}_{\Delta} := \{ \emptyset, \{a_1\}, \{a_2\} \}</math>, that is, a discrete space with two disjoint points (recall that <math>A^{\star 2} =\{ \emptyset, \{a_1\}, \{a_2\}, \{a_1,a_2\} \}</math> = an interval). |
|||
* Suppose <math>A = \{ \emptyset, \{a\} ,\{b\}\}</math> (two points). Then <math> A^{*2}_{\Delta} </math> is a complex with facets <math> \{a_1, b_2\}, \{a_2, b_1\}</math> (two disjoint edges). |
|||
* Suppose <math>A = \{ \emptyset, \{a\} ,\{b\}, \{a,b\}\}</math> (an edge). Then <math> A^{*2}_{\Delta} </math> is a complex with facets <math> \{a_1,b_1\}, \{a_1, b_2\}, \{a_2, b_1\}, \{a_2,b_2\}</math> (a square). Recall that <math>A^{\star 2}</math> represents a solid tetrahedron. |
|||
* Suppose ''A'' represents an (''n''-1)-dimensional simplex (with ''n'' vertices). Then the join <math>A^{\star 2}</math> is a (''2n-''1)-dimensional simplex (with 2''n'' vertices): it is the set of all points (x<sub>1</sub>,...,x<sub>2n</sub>) with non-negative coordinates such that x<sub>1</sub>+...+x<sub>2n</sub>=1. The deleted join <math> A^{*2}_{\Delta} </math> can be regarded as a subset of this simplex: it is the set of all points (x<sub>1</sub>,...,x<sub>2n</sub>) in that simplex, such that the only nonzero coordinates are some ''k'' coordinates in x<sub>1</sub>,..,x<sub>n</sub>, and the complementary n-k coordinates in x<sub>n+1</sub>,...,x<sub>2n</sub>. |
|||
=== Properties === |
|||
The deleted join operation commutes with the join. That is, for every two abstract complexes ''A'' and ''B'':''<ref name=":0" />''{{Rp|location=Lem.5.5.2|page=}} <blockquote><math> (A*B)^{*2}_{\Delta} = (A^{*2}_{\Delta}) * (B^{*2}_{\Delta})</math></blockquote>''Proof''. Each simplex in the left-hand-side complex is of the form <math> (a_1 \sqcup b_1) \sqcup (a_2\sqcup b_2)</math>, where <math> a_1,a_2\in A, b_1,b_2\in B</math>, and <math> (a_1 \sqcup b_1), (a_2\sqcup b_2)</math> are disjoint. Due to the properties of a disjoint union, the latter condition is equivalent to: <math> a_1,a_2</math> are disjoint and <math> b_1,b_2</math> are disjoint. |
|||
Each simplex in the right-hand-side complex is of the form <math> (a_1 \sqcup a_2) \sqcup (b_1\sqcup b_2)</math>, where <math> a_1,a_2\in A, b_1,b_2\in B</math>, and <math> a_1,a_2</math> are disjoint and <math> b_1,b_2</math> are disjoint. So the sets of simplices on both sides are exactly the same. □ |
|||
In particular, the deleted join of the n-dimensional simplex <math> \Delta^n</math> with itself is the n-dimensional [[Cross-polytope|crosspolytope]], which is homeomorphic to the n-dimensional sphere <math> S^n</math>.''<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|location=Cor.5.5.3|page=}}'' |
|||
=== Generalization === |
|||
The '''n-fold k-wise deleted join''' of a simplicial complex A is defined as:<blockquote><math> A^{*n}_{\Delta(k)} := \{ a_1\sqcup a_2 \sqcup\cdots \sqcup a_n: a_1,\cdots,a_n \text{ are k-wise disjoint faces of } A \}</math>, |
|||
where "k-wise disjoint" means that every subset of ''k'' have an empty intersection.</blockquote>In particular, the ''n''-fold ''n''-wise deleted join contains all disjoint unions of ''n'' faces whose intersection is empty, and the ''n''-fold 2-wise deleted join is smaller: it contains only the disjoint unions of ''n'' faces that are pairwise-disjoint. The 2-fold 2-wise deleted join is just the simple deleted join defined above. |
|||
The ''n''-fold 2-wise deleted join of a [[discrete space]] with ''m'' points is called the (''m'',''n'')-[[chessboard complex]]. |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Line 67: | Line 110: | ||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{Reflist}} |
{{Reflist}} |
||
*[[Allen Hatcher|Hatcher, Allen]], [http:// |
*[[Allen Hatcher|Hatcher, Allen]], [http://pi.math.cornell.edu/~hatcher/AT/ATpage.html ''Algebraic topology.''] Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002. xii+544 pp. {{ISBN|0-521-79160-X}} and {{ISBN|0-521-79540-0}} |
||
*{{PlanetMath attribution|id=3985|title=Join}} |
*{{PlanetMath attribution|id=3985|title=Join}} |
||
* [[Ronald Brown (mathematician)|Brown, Ronald]], [http://pages.bangor.ac.uk/~mas010/topgpds.html ''Topology and Groupoids''] Section 5.7 Joins. |
* [[Ronald Brown (mathematician)|Brown, Ronald]], [http://pages.bangor.ac.uk/~mas010/topgpds.html ''Topology and Groupoids''] Section 5.7 Joins. |
Latest revision as of 14:10, 4 October 2024
In topology, a field of mathematics, the join of two topological spaces and , often denoted by or , is a topological space formed by taking the disjoint union of the two spaces, and attaching line segments joining every point in to every point in . The join of a space with itself is denoted by . The join is defined in slightly different ways in different contexts
Geometric sets
[edit]If and are subsets of the Euclidean space , then:[1]: 1
,
that is, the set of all line-segments between a point in and a point in .
Some authors[2]: 5 restrict the definition to subsets that are joinable: any two different line-segments, connecting a point of A to a point of B, meet in at most a common endpoint (that is, they do not intersect in their interior). Every two subsets can be made "joinable". For example, if is in and is in , then and are joinable in . The figure above shows an example for m=n=1, where and are line-segments.
Examples
[edit]- The join of two simplices is a simplex: the join of an n-dimensional and an m-dimensional simplex is an (m+n+1)-dimensional simplex. Some special cases are:
- The join of two disjoint points is an interval (m=n=0).
- The join of a point and an interval is a triangle (m=0, n=1).
- The join of two line segments is homeomorphic to a solid tetrahedron or disphenoid, illustrated in the figure above right (m=n=1).
- The join of a point and an (n-1)-dimensional simplex is an n-dimensional simplex.
- The join of a point and a polygon (or any polytope) is a pyramid, like the join of a point and square is a square pyramid. The join of a point and a cube is a cubic pyramid.
- The join of a point and a circle is a cone, and the join of a point and a sphere is a hypercone.
Topological spaces
[edit]If and are any topological spaces, then:
where the cylinder is attached to the original spaces and along the natural projections of the faces of the cylinder:
Usually it is implicitly assumed that and are non-empty, in which case the definition is often phrased a bit differently: instead of attaching the faces of the cylinder to the spaces and , these faces are simply collapsed in a way suggested by the attachment projections : we form the quotient space
where the equivalence relation is generated by
At the endpoints, this collapses to and to .
If and are bounded subsets of the Euclidean space , and and , where are disjoint subspaces of such that the dimension of their affine hull is (e.g. two non-intersecting non-parallel lines in ), then the topological definition reduces to the geometric definition, that is, the "geometric join" is homeomorphic to the "topological join":[3]: 75, Prop.4.2.4
Abstract simplicial complexes
[edit]If and are any abstract simplicial complexes, then their join is an abstract simplicial complex defined as follows:[3]: 74, Def.4.2.1
- The vertex set is a disjoint union of and .
- The simplices of are all disjoint unions of a simplex of with a simplex of : (in the special case in which and are disjoint, the join is simply ).
Examples
[edit]- Suppose and , that is, two sets with a single point. Then , which represents a line-segment. Note that the vertex sets of A and B are disjoint; otherwise, we should have made them disjoint. For example, where a1 and a2 are two copies of the single element in V(A). Topologically, the result is the same as - a line-segment.
- Suppose and . Then , which represents a triangle.
- Suppose and , that is, two sets with two discrete points. then is a complex with facets , which represents a "square".
The combinatorial definition is equivalent to the topological definition in the following sense:[3]: 77, Exercise.3 for every two abstract simplicial complexes and , is homeomorphic to , where denotes any geometric realization of the complex .
Maps
[edit]Given two maps and , their join is defined based on the representation of each point in the join as , for some :[3]: 77
Special cases
[edit]The cone of a topological space , denoted , is a join of with a single point.
The suspension of a topological space , denoted , is a join of with (the 0-dimensional sphere, or, the discrete space with two points).
Properties
[edit]Commutativity
[edit]The join of two spaces is commutative up to homeomorphism, i.e. .
Associativity
[edit]It is not true that the join operation defined above is associative up to homeomorphism for arbitrary topological spaces. However, for locally compact Hausdorff spaces we have Therefore, one can define the k-times join of a space with itself, (k times).
It is possible to define a different join operation which uses the same underlying set as but a different topology, and this operation is associative for all topological spaces. For locally compact Hausdorff spaces and , the joins and coincide.[4]
Homotopy equivalence
[edit]If and are homotopy equivalent, then and are homotopy equivalent too.[3]: 77, Exercise.2
Reduced join
[edit]Given basepointed CW complexes and , the "reduced join"
is homeomorphic to the reduced suspension
of the smash product. Consequently, since is contractible, there is a homotopy equivalence
This equivalence establishes the isomorphism .
Homotopical connectivity
[edit]Given two triangulable spaces , the homotopical connectivity () of their join is at least the sum of connectivities of its parts:[3]: 81, Prop.4.4.3
- .
As an example, let be a set of two disconnected points. There is a 1-dimensional hole between the points, so . The join is a square, which is homeomorphic to a circle that has a 2-dimensional hole, so . The join of this square with a third copy of is a octahedron, which is homeomorphic to , whose hole is 3-dimensional. In general, the join of n copies of is homeomorphic to and .
Deleted join
[edit]The deleted join of an abstract complex A is an abstract complex containing all disjoint unions of disjoint faces of A:[3]: 112
Examples
[edit]- Suppose (a single point). Then , that is, a discrete space with two disjoint points (recall that = an interval).
- Suppose (two points). Then is a complex with facets (two disjoint edges).
- Suppose (an edge). Then is a complex with facets (a square). Recall that represents a solid tetrahedron.
- Suppose A represents an (n-1)-dimensional simplex (with n vertices). Then the join is a (2n-1)-dimensional simplex (with 2n vertices): it is the set of all points (x1,...,x2n) with non-negative coordinates such that x1+...+x2n=1. The deleted join can be regarded as a subset of this simplex: it is the set of all points (x1,...,x2n) in that simplex, such that the only nonzero coordinates are some k coordinates in x1,..,xn, and the complementary n-k coordinates in xn+1,...,x2n.
Properties
[edit]The deleted join operation commutes with the join. That is, for every two abstract complexes A and B:[3]: Lem.5.5.2
Proof. Each simplex in the left-hand-side complex is of the form , where , and are disjoint. Due to the properties of a disjoint union, the latter condition is equivalent to: are disjoint and are disjoint.
Each simplex in the right-hand-side complex is of the form , where , and are disjoint and are disjoint. So the sets of simplices on both sides are exactly the same. □
In particular, the deleted join of the n-dimensional simplex with itself is the n-dimensional crosspolytope, which is homeomorphic to the n-dimensional sphere .[3]: Cor.5.5.3
Generalization
[edit]The n-fold k-wise deleted join of a simplicial complex A is defined as:
, where "k-wise disjoint" means that every subset of k have an empty intersection.
In particular, the n-fold n-wise deleted join contains all disjoint unions of n faces whose intersection is empty, and the n-fold 2-wise deleted join is smaller: it contains only the disjoint unions of n faces that are pairwise-disjoint. The 2-fold 2-wise deleted join is just the simple deleted join defined above.
The n-fold 2-wise deleted join of a discrete space with m points is called the (m,n)-chessboard complex.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Colin P. Rourke and Brian J. Sanderson (1982). Introduction to Piecewise-Linear Topology. New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-81735-9. ISBN 978-3-540-11102-3.
- ^ Bryant, John L. (2001-01-01), Daverman, R. J.; Sher, R. B. (eds.), "Chapter 5 - Piecewise Linear Topology", Handbook of Geometric Topology, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 219–259, ISBN 978-0-444-82432-5, retrieved 2022-11-15
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Matoušek, Jiří (2007). Using the Borsuk-Ulam Theorem: Lectures on Topological Methods in Combinatorics and Geometry (2nd ed.). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-00362-5.
Written in cooperation with Anders Björner and Günter M. Ziegler
, Section 4.3 - ^ Fomenko, Anatoly; Fuchs, Dmitry (2016). Homotopical Topology (2nd ed.). Springer. p. 20.
- Hatcher, Allen, Algebraic topology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002. xii+544 pp. ISBN 0-521-79160-X and ISBN 0-521-79540-0
- This article incorporates material from Join on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.
- Brown, Ronald, Topology and Groupoids Section 5.7 Joins.