Jump to content

Lucretius: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Misc citation tidying. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by AManWithNoPlan | #UCB_CommandLine
Expanding article
 
(36 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Roman poet and philosopher}}
{{Short description|1st-century BC Roman poet and philosopher}}
{{About|the Roman poet and philosopher|other people named Lucretius|Lucretia gens|the impact crater on the far side of the Moon|Lucretius (crater)}}
{{About|the Roman poet and philosopher|other people named Lucretius|Lucretia gens|the impact crater on the far side of the Moon|Lucretius (crater)}}
{{Infobox philosopher
{{Infobox philosopher
| era = [[Hellenistic philosophy]]
| era = [[Hellenistic philosophy]]
| name = Titus Lucretius Carus
| name = Titus Lucretius Carus
| image = Lucretius1.png
| image = Lucretius pointing to the casus.jpg
| caption = Lucretius pointing to the casus, the downward movement of the atoms. From the frontispiece to ''Of the Nature of Things'', 1682
| caption = Bust of Lucretius
| birth_date = {{circa}} 99 BC
| birth_date = {{circa}} 99 BC
| death_date = {{circa}} 55 BC (aged around 44)
| death_date = {{circa}} 55 BC (aged around 44)
Line 11: Line 11:
| main_interests = [[Ethics]], [[metaphysics]], [[atomic theory]]<ref name="DRNV1200" />
| main_interests = [[Ethics]], [[metaphysics]], [[atomic theory]]<ref name="DRNV1200" />
| notable_ideas =
| notable_ideas =
| influences = [[Hesiod]], [[Gaius Memmius (poet)|Gaius Memmius]], [[Epicurus]], [[Socrates]], [[Plato]], [[Aristotle]], [[Empedocles]]
| influenced = [[Cicero]], [[Virgil]], [[Ovid]], [[Pierre Gassendi]], [[Baruch Spinoza]], [[Stephen Greenblatt]], [[Karl Marx]], [[Sigmund Freud]], [[Charles Darwin]], [[Arthur Schopenhauer]], [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], [[Giacomo Leopardi|Leopardi]], [[Gilles Deleuze]], [[Michel de Montaigne|Montaigne]], [[Thomas Nail]]
}}
}}


'''Titus Lucretius Carus''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|t|aɪ|t|ə|s|_|l|uː|ˈ|k|r|iː|ʃ|ə|s}} {{respell|TY|təs|_|loo|KREE|shəs}}, {{IPA-la|ˈtɪ.tʊz lʊˈkreː.tɪ.ʊs ˈkaː.rʊs|lang}}; {{circa|99}}&nbsp;– {{circa|55 BC}}) was a [[Ancient Rome|Roman]] [[Roman literature|poet]] and [[Ancient Roman philosophy|philosopher]]. His only known work is the philosophical poem ''[[De rerum natura]]'', a [[didactic]] work about the tenets and philosophy of [[Epicureanism]], and which usually is translated into English as ''On the Nature of Things''—and somewhat less often as ''On the Nature of the Universe''. Lucretius has been credited with originating the concept of the [[three-age system]] that was formalised in 1836 by [[Christian Jürgensen Thomsen|C. J. Thomsen]].
'''Titus Lucretius Carus''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|t|aɪ|t|ə|s|_|l|uː|ˈ|k|r|iː|ʃ|ə|s}} {{respell|TY|təs|_|loo|KREE|shəs}}, {{IPA|la|ˈtitus luˈkreːti.us ˈkaːrus|lang}}; {{circa|99}}&nbsp;– {{circa|55 BC}}) was a [[Ancient Rome|Roman]] [[Roman literature|poet]] and [[Ancient Roman philosophy|philosopher]]. His only known work is the philosophical poem ''[[De rerum natura]]'', a [[didactic]] work about the [[tenets]] and philosophy of [[Epicureanism]], which usually is translated into English as ''On the Nature of Things''—and somewhat less often as ''On the Nature of the Universe''.
Very little is known about Lucretius's life; the only certainty is that he was either a friend or [[Patronage in ancient Rome|client]] of [[Gaius Memmius (praetor 58 BC)|Gaius Memmius]], to whom the poem was addressed and dedicated.{{sfnp | Melville | Fowler | 2008 | p=xii }} ''De rerum natura'' was a considerable influence on the [[Augustan poetry|Augustan poets]], particularly [[Virgil]] (in his ''[[Aeneid]]'' and ''[[Georgics]]'', and to a lesser extent on the ''[[Eclogues]]'') and [[Horace]].<ref>Reckford, K. J. ''Some studies in Horace's [[ode]]s on love''</ref> The work was almost lost during the [[Middle Ages]], but was rediscovered in 1417 in a monastery in Germany{{sfnp|Greenblatt|2009|p=44 }} by [[Poggio Bracciolini]] and it played an important role both in the development of [[atomism]] (Lucretius was an important influence on [[Pierre Gassendi]])<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|title=Pierre Gassendi|last=Fisher|first=Saul|year=2009|encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|url=http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2009/entries/gassendi/}}</ref> and the efforts of various figures of the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment era]] to construct a new [[Christian humanism]].

Very little is known about Lucretius's life; the only certainty is that he was either a friend or [[Patronage in ancient Rome|client]] of [[Gaius Memmius (praetor 58 BC)|Gaius Memmius]], to whom the poem was addressed and dedicated.{{sfnp | Melville | Fowler | 2008 | p=xii }}

''De rerum natura'' was a considerable influence on the [[Augustan poetry|Augustan poets]], particularly [[Virgil]] (in his ''[[Aeneid]]'' and ''[[Georgics]]'', and to a lesser extent on the ''[[Eclogues]]'') and [[Horace]].<ref>Reckford, K. J. ''Some studies in Horace's odes on love''</ref> The work was almost lost during the [[Middle Ages]], but was rediscovered in 1417 in a monastery in Germany{{sfnp|Greenblatt|2009|p=44 }} by [[Poggio Bracciolini]] and it played an important role both in the development of [[atomism]] (Lucretius was an important influence on [[Pierre Gassendi]])<ref>
{{cite encyclopedia|title=Pierre Gassendi|last=Fisher|first=Saul|year=2009|encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|url=http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2009/entries/gassendi/}}</ref> and the efforts of various figures of the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment era]] to construct a new [[Christian humanism]]. Lucretius's scientific poem ''On the Nature of Things'' {{nowrap|(c. 60 BC)}} has a remarkable description of [[Brownian motion]] of dust particles in verses 113–140 from Book II. He uses this as a proof of the existence of atoms.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0131%3Abook%3D2%3Acard%3D80|title=Lucretius, De Rerum Natura (Lucr. 2.80)|accessdate=2021-11-18|date=1916|editor=William Ellery Leonard}}</ref>


== Life ==
== Life ==
Line 35: Line 29:
| width = 20em
| width = 20em
}}
}}
Virtually nothing is known about the life of Lucretius, and there is insufficient basis for a confident assertion of the dates of Lucretius's birth or death in other sources. Another, yet briefer, note is found in the ''[[Chronicon (Jerome)|Chronicon]]'' of Donatus's pupil, [[Jerome]]. Writing four centuries after Lucretius's death, he enters under the 171st [[Olympiad]]: "Titus Lucretius the poet is born."<ref name=chronicon>[[Jerome]], ''[[Chronicon (Jerome)|Chronicon]]''.</ref> If Jerome is accurate about Lucretius's age (43) when Lucretius died (discussed below), then it may be concluded he was born in 99 or 98 BC.{{sfnp | Bailey | 1947 | pp=1–3}}{{sfnp | Smith | 1992 | pp=x–xi }} Less specific estimates place the birth of Lucretius in the 90s BC and his death in the 50s BC,{{sfnp | Kenney | 1971 | p=6 }}{{sfnp | Costa | 1984 | p=ix }} in agreement with the poem's many allusions to the tumultuous state of political affairs in [[Rome]] and its [[Roman civil wars|civil strife]].
Virtually nothing is known about the life of Lucretius, and there is insufficient basis for a confident assertion of the dates of Lucretius's birth or death in other sources. Another, yet briefer, note is found in the ''[[Chronicon (Jerome)|Chronicon]]'' of Donatus's pupil, [[Jerome]]. Writing four centuries after Lucretius's death, he enters under the 171st [[Olympiad]]: "Titus Lucretius the poet is born."<ref name=chronicon>[[Jerome]], ''[[Chronicon (Jerome)|Chronicon]]''.</ref> If Jerome is accurate about Lucretius's age (43) when Lucretius died (discussed below), then it may be concluded he was born in 99 or 98 BC.{{sfnp | Bailey | 1947 | pp=1–3}}{{sfnp | Smith | 1992 | pp=x–xi }} Less specific estimates place the birth of Lucretius in the 90s BC and his death in the 50s BC,{{sfnp | Kenney | 1971 | p=6 }}{{sfnp | Costa | 1984 | p=ix }} in agreement with the poem's many [[allusion]]s to the tumultuous state of political affairs in [[Rome]] and its [[Roman civil wars|civil strife]].
[[File:Titi Lucretii Cari De rerum natura.jpg|thumb|Start of late 15th-century illuminated manuscript of ''[[De rerum natura]]'']]


Lucretius probably was a member of the aristocratic ''[[Lucretia gens|gens Lucretia]]'', and his work shows an intimate knowledge of the luxurious lifestyle in Rome.{{sfnp | Melville | Fowler | 2008 | loc=Foreword }} Lucretius's love of the countryside invites speculation that he inhabited family-owned rural estates, as did many wealthy Roman families, and he certainly was expensively educated with a mastery of Latin, Greek, literature, and philosophy.{{sfnp | Melville | Fowler | 2008 | loc=Foreword }}
Lucretius probably was a member of the [[aristocratic]] ''[[Lucretia gens|gens Lucretia]]'', and his work shows an intimate knowledge of the luxurious lifestyle in Rome.{{sfnp | Melville | Fowler | 2008 | loc=Foreword }} Lucretius's love of the countryside invites speculation that he inhabited family-owned rural estates, as did many wealthy Roman families, and he certainly was expensively educated with a mastery of Latin, Greek, literature, and philosophy.{{sfnp | Melville | Fowler | 2008 | loc=Foreword }}


A brief biographical note is found in [[Aelius Donatus]]'s ''Life of Virgil'', which seems to be derived from an earlier work by [[Suetonius]].{{sfnp | Horsfall | 2000 | p=3 }} The note reads: "The first years of his life Virgil spent in Cremona until the assumption of his ''[[toga virilis]]'' on his 17th birthday (when the same two men held the [[Roman consul|consulate]] as when he was born), and it so happened that on the very same day Lucretius the poet passed away." However, although Lucretius certainly lived and died around the time that Virgil and Cicero [[fl.|flourished]], the information in this particular testimony is internally inconsistent: if Virgil was born in 70 BC, his 17th birthday would be in 53. The two consuls of 70 BC, [[Pompey]] and [[Marcus Licinius Crassus|Crassus]], stood together as consuls again in 55, not 53. Another yet briefer note is found in the ''[[Chronicon (Jerome)|Chronicon]]'' of Donatus's pupil, [[Jerome]]. Writing four centuries after Lucretius's death, Jerome contends in the aforementioned ''Chronicon'' that Lucretius "was driven mad by a love [[potion]], and when, during the intervals of his insanity, he had written a number of books, which were later emended by Cicero, he killed himself by his own hand in the 44th year of his life."<ref name=chronicon/> The claim that he was driven mad by a love potion, although defended by such scholars as Reale and Catan,{{sfnp | Reale | Catan | 1980 | p=414 }} is often dismissed as the result of historical confusion,{{sfnp | Melville | Fowler | 2008 | p=xii }} or anti-Epicurean bias.{{sfnp | Smith | 2011 | p=vii }} In some accounts the administration of the toxic aphrodisiac is attributed to his wife [[Lucilia (wife of Lucretius)|Lucilia]]. Regardless, Jerome's image of Lucretius as a lovesick, mad poet continued to have significant influence on modern scholarship until quite recently, although it now is accepted that such a report is inaccurate.{{sfnp | Gale | 2007 | p=2 }}
A brief biographical note is found in [[Aelius Donatus]]'s ''Life of [[Virgil]]'', which seems to be derived from an earlier work by [[Suetonius]].{{sfnp | Horsfall | 2000 | p=3 }} The note reads: "The first years of his life Virgil spent in Cremona until the assumption of his ''[[toga virilis]]'' on his 17th birthday (when the same two men held the [[Roman consul|consulate]] as when he was born), and it so happened that on the very same day Lucretius the poet passed away." However, although Lucretius certainly lived and died around the time that Virgil and Cicero [[fl.|flourished]], the information in this particular testimony is internally inconsistent: if Virgil was born in 70 BC, his 17th birthday would be in 53. The two consuls of 70 BC, [[Pompey]] and [[Marcus Licinius Crassus|Crassus]], stood together as consuls again in 55, not 53.
Another note regarding Lucretius's biography is found in Jerome's ''Chronicon'', where he contends that Lucretius "was driven mad by a love [[potion]], and when, during the intervals of his insanity, he had written a number of books, which were later emended by Cicero, he killed himself by his own hand in the 44th year of his life."<ref name=chronicon/> The claim that he was driven mad by a love potion, although defended by such scholars as Reale and Catan,{{sfnp | Reale | Catan | 1980 | p=414 }} is often dismissed as the result of historical confusion,{{sfnp | Melville | Fowler | 2008 | p=xii }} or anti-Epicurean bias.{{sfnp | Smith | 2011 | p=vii }} In some accounts the administration of the toxic aphrodisiac is attributed to his wife [[Lucilia (wife of Lucretius)|Lucilia]]. Regardless, Jerome's image of Lucretius as a lovesick, mad poet continued to have significant influence on modern scholarship until quite recently, although it now is accepted that such a report is inaccurate.{{sfnp | Gale | 2007 | p=2 }}


== ''De rerum natura'' ==
== ''De rerum natura'' ==
{{main article|De rerum natura}}
{{main article|De rerum natura}}
[[File:Start_of_Lucretius_DRN_manuscript.jpg|thumb|left|A manuscript of ''De rerum natura'' in the Cambridge University Library collection]]
[[File:T. Lucretii Cari De rerum natura.tif|thumb|upright|''De rerum natura'' (1570)]]


His poem ''De rerum natura'' (usually translated as "On the Nature of Things" or "On the Nature of the Universe") transmits the ideas of [[Epicureanism]], which includes [[atomism]] and [[cosmology]]. Lucretius was the first writer known to introduce Roman readers to Epicurean philosophy.{{sfnp | Gale | 2007 | p=35 }} The poem, written in some 7,400 [[dactylic hexameter]]s, is divided into six untitled books, and explores Epicurean physics through richly poetic language and metaphors. Lucretius presents the principles of atomism, the nature of the mind and soul, explanations of sensation and thought, the development of the world and its phenomena, and explains a variety of celestial and terrestrial phenomena. The universe described in the poem operates according to these physical principles, guided by ''fortuna'', "chance", and not the divine intervention of the [[Religion in ancient Rome|traditional Roman deities]]<ref>In particular, ''De rerum natura'' 5.107 (''fortuna gubernans'', "guiding chance" or "fortune at the helm"): see Monica R. Gale, ''Myth and Poetry in Lucretius'' (Cambridge University Press, 1994, 1996 reprint), pp. 213, 223–224 [https://books.google.com/books?id=gf8k02Iud74C&q=%22there+is+no+divine+providence%22 online] and ''Lucretius'' (Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 238 [https://books.google.com/books?id=mHadLr3QVUMC&dq=%22the+necessity+of+its+process+through+its+physics%22&pg=PA238 online.]</ref> and the religious explanations of the natural world.
His poem ''De rerum natura'' (usually translated as "On the Nature of Things" or "On the Nature of the Universe") transmits the ideas of [[Epicureanism]], which includes [[atomism]] and [[cosmology]]. Lucretius was the first writer known to introduce Roman readers to Epicurean philosophy.{{sfnp | Gale | 2007 | p=35 }} The poem, written in some 7,400 [[dactylic hexameter]]s, is divided into six untitled books, and explores Epicurean physics through richly poetic language and [[metaphor]]s. Lucretius presents the principles of [[atomism]], the nature of the mind and [[soul]], explanations of sensation and thought, the development of the world and its [[phenomena]], and explains a variety of celestial and terrestrial [[phenomena]]. The universe described in the poem operates according to these physical principles, guided by ''fortuna'', "chance", and not the [[divine intervention]] of the [[Religion in ancient Rome|traditional Roman deities]]<ref>In particular, ''De rerum natura'' 5.107 (''fortuna gubernans'', "guiding chance" or "fortune at the helm"): see Monica R. Gale, ''Myth and Poetry in Lucretius'' (Cambridge University Press, 1994, 1996 reprint), pp. 213, 223–224 [https://books.google.com/books?id=gf8k02Iud74C&q=%22there+is+no+divine+providence%22 online] and ''Lucretius'' (Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 238 [https://books.google.com/books?id=mHadLr3QVUMC&dq=%22the+necessity+of+its+process+through+its+physics%22&pg=PA238 online.]</ref> and the religious explanations of the natural world.


Within this work, Lucretius makes reference to the cultural and technological development of humans in his use of available materials, tools, and weapons through prehistory to Lucretius's own time. He specifies the earliest weapons as hands, nails, and teeth. These were followed by stones, branches, and, once humans could kindle and control it, fire. He then refers to "tough iron" and copper in that order, but goes on to say that copper was the primary means of tilling the soil and the basis of weaponry until, "by slow degrees", the iron sword became predominant (it still was in his day) and "the bronze sickle fell into disrepute" as iron ploughs were introduced.<ref name=DRNV1200>{{cite book |last=Lucretius |author-link=Lucretius |title=De rerum natura, Book V, around Line 1200 ff. }}</ref> He had earlier envisaged a pre-technological, pre-literary kind of human whose life was lived "in the fashion of wild beasts roaming at large".<ref name=DRNV940>{{cite book |last=Lucretius |author-link=Lucretius |title=De rerum natura, Book V, around line 940 ff. }}</ref> From this beginning, he theorised, there followed the development in turn of crude huts, use and kindling of fire, clothing, language, family, and city-states. He believed that smelting of metal, and perhaps too, the firing of pottery, was discovered by accident: for example, the result of a forest fire. He does specify, however, that the use of copper followed the use of stones and branches and preceded the use of iron.<ref name=DRNV940/>
Within this work, Lucretius makes reference to the cultural and technological development of humans in his use of available materials, tools, and weapons through prehistory to Lucretius's own time. He specifies the earliest weapons as hands, nails, and teeth. These were followed by stones, branches, and fire (once humans could kindle and control it). He then refers to "tough iron" and copper in that order, but goes on to say that copper was the primary means of tilling the soil and the basis of weaponry until, "by slow degrees", the iron sword became predominant (it still was in his day) and "the bronze sickle fell into disrepute" as iron ploughs were introduced.<ref name=DRNV1200>{{cite book |last=Lucretius |author-link=Lucretius |title=De rerum natura, Book V, around Line 1200 ff. }}</ref> He had earlier envisaged a pre-technological, pre-literary kind of human whose life was lived "in the fashion of wild beasts roaming at large".<ref name=DRNV940>{{cite book |last=Lucretius |author-link=Lucretius |title=De rerum natura, Book V, around line 940 ff. }}</ref> From this beginning, he theorised, there followed the development in turn of crude huts, use and kindling of fire, clothing, language, family, and [[city-state]]s. He believed that smelting of metal, and perhaps too, the firing of pottery, was discovered by accident: for example, the result of a forest fire. He does specify, however, that the use of copper followed the use of stones and branches and preceded the use of iron.<ref name=DRNV940/>
Lucretius seems to equate copper with [[bronze]], an alloy of copper and tin that has much greater resilience than copper; both copper and bronze were superseded by iron during his millennium (1000 BC to 1 BC). He may have considered bronze to be a stronger variety of copper and not necessarily a wholly individual material. Lucretius is believed to be the first to put forward a theory of the successive uses of first wood and stone, then copper and bronze, and finally iron. Although his theory lay dormant for many centuries, it was revived in the nineteenth century and he has been credited with originating the concept of the [[three-age system]] that was formalised from 1834 by [[Christian Jürgensen Thomsen|C. J. Thomsen]].<ref>Barnes, pp. 27–28.</ref><gallery>
Lucretius seems to equate copper with [[bronze]], an alloy of copper and tin that has much greater resilience than copper; both copper and bronze were superseded by iron during his millennium (1000 BC to 1 BC). He may have considered bronze to be a stronger variety of copper and not necessarily a wholly individual material. Lucretius is believed to be the first to put forward a theory of the successive uses of first wood and stone, then copper and bronze, and finally iron. Although his theory lay dormant for many centuries, it was revived in the nineteenth century and he has been credited with originating the concept of the [[three-age system]] that was formalised from 1834 by [[Christian Jürgensen Thomsen|C. J. Thomsen]].<ref>Barnes, pp. 27–28.</ref><gallery>
File:T. Lucretii Cari De rerum natura.tif|''De rerum natura'' (1570)
File:Carus-3.jpg|alt=|1754 copy of ''De rerum natura''
File:Carus-3.jpg|alt=|1754 copy of ''De rerum natura''
File:Carus-4.jpg|alt=|Frontispiece of a 1754 copy of ''De rerum natura''
File:Carus-4.jpg|alt=|Frontispiece of a 1754 copy of ''De rerum natura''
Line 58: Line 54:


===Reception===
===Reception===
In a letter by [[Cicero]] to his brother [[Quintus Tullius Cicero|Quintus]] in February 54 BC, Cicero said: "The poems of Lucretius are as you write: they exhibit many flashes of genius, and yet show great mastership."{{sfnp | Cicero | loc=2.9 }} In the work of another author in late Republican Rome, [[Virgil]] writes in the second book of his ''Georgics'', apparently referring to Lucretius,{{sfnp | Smith | 1975 | loc = intro }} "Happy is he who has discovered the causes of things and has cast beneath his feet{{efn|name=subiecit pedibus}} all fears, unavoidable fate, and the din of the devouring Underworld."{{sfnp | Virgil | loc=2.490 }}
In a letter by [[Cicero]] to his brother [[Quintus Tullius Cicero|Quintus]] in February 54 BC, Cicero said: "The poems of Lucretius are as you write: they exhibit many flashes of [[genius]], and yet show great mastership."{{sfnp | Cicero | loc=2.9 }} In the work of another author in late Republican Rome, [[Virgil]] writes in the second book of his ''Georgics'', apparently referring to Lucretius,{{sfnp | Smith | 1975 | loc = intro }} "Happy is he who has discovered the causes of things and has cast beneath his feet{{efn|name=subiecit pedibus}} all fears, unavoidable fate, and the din of the devouring Underworld."{{sfnp | Virgil | loc=2.490 }}


==Natural philosophy==
==Natural philosophy==


An early thinker in what grew to become the study of [[evolution]], Lucretius believed nature experiments endlessly across the aeons, and the organisms that adapt best to their environment have the best chance of surviving. Living organisms survived because of the commensurate relationship between their strength, speed, or intellect and the external dynamics of their environment. Prior to [[Charles Darwin]]'s 1859 publication of ''[[On the Origin of Species]]'', the natural philosophy of Lucretius typified one of the foremost non-[[Teleology|teleological]] and mechanistic accounts of the creation and evolution of life.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Campbell|first=Gordon|title=Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De rerum natura 5.772-1104|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2003|isbn=0199263965|location=Oxford/New York|pages=3–6}}</ref> In contrast to modern thought on the subject, he did not believe that new species evolved from previously existing ones and denied that modern animals, which dwell on land, derived from marine ancestors. Lucretius challenged the assumption that humans are necessarily superior to animals, noting that mammalian mothers in the wild recognize and nurture their offspring as do human mothers.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Massaro|first=Alma|date=2014-11-11|title=The Living in Lucretius' De rerum natura. Animals' ataraxia and Humans' Distress|url=https://www.ledonline.it/index.php/Relations/article/view/672|journal=Relations. Beyond Anthropocentrism|language=en|volume=2|issue=2|pages=45–58|doi=10.7358/rela-2014-002-mass|issn=2280-9643|doi-access=free}}</ref>
Lucretius was an early thinker in what grew to become the study of [[evolution]]. He believed that nature experiments endlessly across the aeons, and the organisms that adapt best to their environment have the best chance of surviving. Living organisms survived because of the commensurate relationship between their strength, speed, or intellect and the external dynamics of their environment. Prior to [[Charles Darwin]]'s 1859 publication of ''[[On the Origin of Species]]'', the natural philosophy of Lucretius typified one of the foremost non-[[Teleology|teleological]] and mechanistic accounts of the creation and evolution of life.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Campbell|first=Gordon|title=Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De rerum natura 5.772-1104|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2003|isbn=0199263965|location=Oxford/New York|pages=3–6}}</ref> In contrast to modern thought on the subject, he did not believe that new species evolved from previously existing ones. Lucretius challenged the assumption that humans are necessarily superior to animals, noting that mammalian mothers in the wild recognize and nurture their offspring as do human mothers.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Massaro|first=Alma|date=2014-11-11|title=The Living in Lucretius' De rerum natura. Animals' ataraxia and Humans' Distress|url=https://www.ledonline.it/index.php/Relations/article/view/672|journal=Relations. Beyond Anthropocentrism|language=en|volume=2|issue=2|pages=45–58|doi=10.7358/rela-2014-002-mass|issn=2280-9643|doi-access=free}}</ref>


Despite his advocacy of [[empiricism]] and his many correct conjectures about atomism and the nature of the physical world, Lucretius concludes his first book stressing the absurdity of the (by then well-established) [[spherical Earth]] theory.<ref name="Hannam-Aeon">{{cite web |last=Hannam |first=James |title=Atoms and flat-earth ethics |url=https://aeon.co/essays/lucretius-the-flat-earth-and-the-malaise-of-modern-science |website=Aeon |access-date=8 May 2019 |archive-url=https://archive.today/2019.04.29-101743/https://aeon.co/essays/lucretius-the-flat-earth-and-the-malaise-of-modern-science |archive-date=29 April 2019 |date=29 April 2019}}</ref>
Despite his advocacy of [[empiricism]] and his many correct conjectures about atomism and the nature of the physical world, Lucretius concludes his first book stressing the absurdity of the (by then well-established) [[spherical Earth]] theory<ref name="Hannam-Aeon">{{cite web |last=Hannam |first=James |title=Atoms and flat-earth ethics |url=https://aeon.co/essays/lucretius-the-flat-earth-and-the-malaise-of-modern-science |website=Aeon |access-date=8 May 2019 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20190429101743/https://aeon.co/essays/lucretius-the-flat-earth-and-the-malaise-of-modern-science |archive-date=29 April 2019 |date=29 April 2019}}</ref> as it related to the personally favored infinite Earth hypothesis which did not make reference to outer bodies.<ref>{{Cite book |title=Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom |last=Sedley |first=David N. |date=2003 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |isbn=978-0-521-54214-2 |place=Cambridge |pages=78–82 }}</ref><ref>Lucretius, ''De rerum natura'', 1.1052–82.</ref>


While [[Epicurus]] left open the possibility for [[free will]] by arguing for the [[Brownian motion|uncertainty of the paths of atoms]], Lucretius viewed the soul or mind as emerging from arrangements of distinct particles.<ref>{{cite book |last=Gillispie |first=Charles Coulston |author-link=Charles Coulston Gillispie |title=The Edge of Objectivity: An Essay in the History of Scientific Ideas |year=1960 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=0-691-02350-6 |page=[https://archive.org/details/edgeofobjectivit00char/page/98 98] |url=https://archive.org/details/edgeofobjectivit00char/page/98 }}</ref>
While [[Epicurus]] left open the possibility for [[free will]] by arguing for the [[Brownian motion|uncertainty of the paths of atoms]], Lucretius viewed the soul or mind as emerging from fortuitous arrangements of distinct particles.<ref>{{cite book |last=Gillispie |first=Charles Coulston |author-link=Charles Coulston Gillispie |title=The Edge of Objectivity: An Essay in the History of Scientific Ideas |year=1960 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=0-691-02350-6 |page=[https://archive.org/details/edgeofobjectivit00char/page/98 98] |url=https://archive.org/details/edgeofobjectivit00char/page/98 }}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
* ''[[The Swerve: How the World Became Modern]]'', a modern [[historiography]] by [[Stephen Greenblatt]]
* ''[[The Swerve: How the World Became Modern]]'', a modern [[historiography]] by [[Stephen Greenblatt]]
* [[List of English translations of De rerum natura|List of English translations of ''De rerum natura'']]
* [[List of English translations of De rerum natura|List of English translations of ''De rerum natura'']]
* [[Javelin argument]]


== Notes ==
== Notes ==
Line 88: Line 85:


== Bibliography ==
== Bibliography ==
{{see also|De_rerum_natura#Editions}}
{{Refbegin|30em}}
{{Refbegin|30em}}
* {{cite book |last=Bailey |first=C. |chapter=Prolegomena |title=Lucretius's De rerum natura |year=1947 }}
* {{cite book |last=Bailey |first=C. |chapter=Prolegomena |title=Lucretius's De rerum natura |year=1947 }}
Line 96: Line 94:
* {{cite book |last=Gale |first=M.R. |title=Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Lucretius |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-19-926034-8 }}
* {{cite book |last=Gale |first=M.R. |title=Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Lucretius |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-19-926034-8 }}
* {{cite book |last=Greenblatt |first=Stephen | author-link=Stephen Greenblatt |title=[[The Swerve: How the World Became Modern]] |publisher=WW. Norton and Company |location=New York |year=2009 }}
* {{cite book |last=Greenblatt |first=Stephen | author-link=Stephen Greenblatt |title=[[The Swerve: How the World Became Modern]] |publisher=WW. Norton and Company |location=New York |year=2009 }}
* {{cite book |last=Horsfall |first=N. |year=2000 |title=A Companion to the Study of Virgil |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EsxUp4Cy3q8C |access-date=16 May 2012 |isbn=978-90-04-11951-2 }}
* {{cite book |last=Horsfall |first=N. |year=2000 |title=A Companion to the Study of Virgil |publisher=BRILL |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EsxUp4Cy3q8C |access-date=16 May 2012 |isbn=978-90-04-11951-2 }}
* {{cite book |last=Kenney |first=E. J. |title=Lucretius: De rerum natura |chapter=Introduction |isbn=978-0-521-29177-4 |year=1971 |publisher=Cambridge University Press }}
* {{cite book |last=Kenney |first=E. J. |title=Lucretius: De rerum natura |chapter=Introduction |isbn=978-0-521-29177-4 |year=1971 |publisher=Cambridge University Press }}
* {{cite book |editor-last1=Melville |editor-first1=Ronald |editor-last2=Fowler |editor-first2=Don and Peta |title=Lucretius: On the Nature of the Universe |series=Oxford World's Classics |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2008 |orig-year=1999 |isbn=978-0-19-162327-1 }}<!-- or origyear=1997 -->
* {{cite book |editor-last1=Melville |editor-first1=Ronald |editor-last2=Fowler |editor-first2=Don and Peta |title=Lucretius: On the Nature of the Universe |series=Oxford World's Classics |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2008 |orig-year=1999 |isbn=978-0-19-162327-1 }}<!-- or origyear=1997 -->
Line 108: Line 106:
{{Refend}}
{{Refend}}


== Further reading ==
'''Editions'''
{{Refbegin|30em}}
* Hutchinson, Lucy (b. 1620 d. 1681) ''De Rerum Natura.''
* Lucretius. ''De rerum natura''. (3 vols. Latin text Books I-VI. Comprehensive commentary by Cyril Bailey), Oxford University Press 1947.
* ''On the Nature of Things'', (1951 prose translation by [[R. E. Latham]]), introduction and notes by John Godwin, Penguin revised edition 1994, {{ISBN|0-14-044610-9}}
* T. Lucreti Cari De rerum natura (1963). Edidit Joseph Martin (Bibliotheca scriptorvm Graecorvm et Romanorvm Tevbneriana).
* Lucretius (1971). ''De rerum natura Book III''. (Latin version of Book III only– 37 pp., with extensive commentary by E. J. Kenney– 171 pp.), Cambridge University Press corrected reprint 1984. {{ISBN|0-521-29177-1}}
* Lucretius (2008 [1997, 1999]), ''On the Nature of the Universe'' (tr. Melville, Ronald) (introduction and notes by Fowler, Don; Fowler, Peta). Oxford University Press [Oxford World Classics], {{ISBN|978-0-19-955514-7}}
* Munro H. A. J. ''[https://archive.org/stream/onnatureofthing00lucr#page/n5/mode/2up Lucretius: On the Nature of Things]'' Translated, with an analysis of the six books. 4th Edn, Routledge (1886). Online version at the Internet Archive (2011).
* Piazzi, Lisa (2006) ''Lucrezio e i presocratici.'' Edizioni della Normale.
* Stallings, A.E. (2007) ''Lucretius: The Nature of Things.'' Penguin Classics. Penguin.
*Englert, W (2003) ''Lucretius: On the Nature of Things'' (Focus Publishing).
{{Refend}}


* {{Cite book |title=Lucretius: his continuing influence and contemporary relevance |date=2011 |publisher=[[RIT Press]] |isbn=978-1-933360-49-2 |editor-last=Madigan |editor-first=Tim |location=Rochester, NY |language=en |editor-last2=Suits |editor-first2=David B.}}
'''Commentary'''
{{Refbegin|30em}}
* Beretta, Marco. Francesco Citti (edd), ''Lucrezio, la natura e la scienza'' (Firenze: Leo S. Olschki, 2008) (Biblioteca di Nuncius / Istituto e Museo distoria della scienza, Firenze; 66).
* Campbell, Gordon. ''Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on ''De rerum natura'' Book Five, Lines 772–1104'' (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
* DeMay, Philip. ''Lucretius: Poet and Epicurean'' (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009) (Series: Greece & Rome: texts and contexts).
* Deufert, Marcus. ''Pseudo-Lukrezisches im Lukrez'' (Berlin-New York, 1996).
* Erler M. "Lukrez," in H. Flashar (ed.), ''Die Philosophie der Antike. Bd. 4. Die hellenistische Philosophie'' (Basel, 1994), 381–490.
* Esolen, Anthony M. ''Lucretius On the Nature of Things'' (Baltimore, 1995).
* Fowler, Don. ''Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De rerum natura 2. 1–332'' (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
* Johnson, W.R. ''Lucretius and the Modern World'' (London, Duckworth, 2000).
* Marković, Daniel. ''The Rhetoric of Explanation in Lucretius' De rerum natura'' (Leiden, Brill, 2008) (Mnemosyne, Supplements, 294).
* Melville, Ronald. ''Lucretius: On the Nature of the Universe'' (Oxford, 1997).
* Nail, Thomas. ''Lucretius I: An Ontology of Motion'' (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2018).
* Nail, Thomas. ''Lucretius II: An Ethics of Motion'' (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020).
* Gale Monica R. (ed.), ''Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Lucretius'' (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).
* Garani, Myrto. ''Empedocles Redivivus: poetry and analogy in Lucretius. Studies in classics'' (London; New York: Routledge, 2007).
* Godwin, John. ''Lucretius'' (London: Bristol Classical Press, 2004) ("Ancient in Action" Series).
* Rumpf L. ''Naturerkenntnis und Naturerfahrung. Zur Reflexion epikureischer Theorie bei Lukrez'' (Munich: C.H. Beck, 2003) (Zetemata, 116).
* Sedley, David N. ''Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom'' (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008 [1998]).
* Strauss, Leo. "Notes on Lucretius," in ''Liberalism: Ancient and Modern'' (Chicago, 1968), 76–139.
{{Refend}}


==External links==
==External links==
Line 159: Line 125:
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lucretius/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry]
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lucretius/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry]
* [http://www.intratext.com/Catalogo/Autori/AUT238.HTM Lucretius's works]: text, concordances and frequency list
* [http://www.intratext.com/Catalogo/Autori/AUT238.HTM Lucretius's works]: text, concordances and frequency list
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20061126015734/http://bsa.biblio.univ-lille3.fr/lucretius.htm Bibliography De rerum natura Book III]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20061126015734/http://bsa.biblio.univ-lille3.fr/lucretius.htm Bibliography De rerum natura Book III] (archived 26 November 2006)
* [http://hos.ou.edu/galleries//02LateAncient/Lucretius/ Online Galleries, History of Science Collections, University of Oklahoma Libraries] High-resolution images of works by Lucretius in .jpg and .tiff format.
* [http://hos.ou.edu/galleries//02LateAncient/Lucretius/ Online Galleries, History of Science Collections, University of Oklahoma Libraries] High-resolution images of works by Lucretius in .jpg and .tiff format.
* Lucretius: [http://roderic.uv.es/uv_ms_0506 ''De rerum natura''] (1475–1494), digitised codex at [http://roderic.uv.es/handle/10550/43 Somni]
* Lucretius: [http://roderic.uv.es/uv_ms_0506 ''De rerum natura''] (1475–1494), digitised codex at [http://roderic.uv.es/handle/10550/43 Somni]
Line 175: Line 141:
[[Category:1st-century BC philosophers]]
[[Category:1st-century BC philosophers]]
[[Category:1st-century BC Roman poets]]
[[Category:1st-century BC Roman poets]]
[[Category:1st-century BC Romans]]
[[Category:Atheist philosophers]]
[[Category:Atomists]]
[[Category:Atomists]]
[[Category:Classical humanists]]
[[Category:Critics of religions]]
[[Category:Determinists]]
[[Category:Didactic poets]]
[[Category:Didactic poets]]
[[Category:Empiricists]]
[[Category:Empiricists]]
[[Category:Epic poets]]
[[Category:Epic poets]]
[[Category:Epicureanism]]
[[Category:Epistemologists]]
[[Category:Golden Age Latin writers]]
[[Category:Golden Age Latin writers]]
[[Category:Humanism]]
[[Category:Lucretii]]
[[Category:Lucretii]]
[[Category:Metaphysicians]]
[[Category:Metaphysicians]]
[[Category:Natural philosophers]]
[[Category:Natural philosophers]]
[[Category:Ontologists]]
[[Category:Philosophers of culture]]
[[Category:Philosophers of literature]]
[[Category:Philosophers of science]]
[[Category:Roman-era Epicurean philosophers]]
[[Category:Roman-era Epicurean philosophers]]
[[Category:Ancient Roman philosophers]]
[[Category:Ancient Roman poets]]
[[Category:Ancient Roman poets]]
[[Category:Secular humanists]]
[[Category:Philosophers of Roman Italy]]
[[Category:Secularism]]

Latest revision as of 00:45, 5 October 2024

Titus Lucretius Carus
Lucretius pointing to the casus, the downward movement of the atoms. From the frontispiece to Of the Nature of Things, 1682
Bornc. 99 BC
Diedc. 55 BC (aged around 44)
EraHellenistic philosophy
SchoolEpicureanism
Atomism
Materialism
Main interests
Ethics, metaphysics, atomic theory[1]

Titus Lucretius Carus (/ˈttəs lˈkrʃəs/ TY-təs loo-KREE-shəs, Latin: [ˈtitus luˈkreːti.us ˈkaːrus]; c. 99 – c. 55 BC) was a Roman poet and philosopher. His only known work is the philosophical poem De rerum natura, a didactic work about the tenets and philosophy of Epicureanism, which usually is translated into English as On the Nature of Things—and somewhat less often as On the Nature of the Universe. Very little is known about Lucretius's life; the only certainty is that he was either a friend or client of Gaius Memmius, to whom the poem was addressed and dedicated.[2] De rerum natura was a considerable influence on the Augustan poets, particularly Virgil (in his Aeneid and Georgics, and to a lesser extent on the Eclogues) and Horace.[3] The work was almost lost during the Middle Ages, but was rediscovered in 1417 in a monastery in Germany[4] by Poggio Bracciolini and it played an important role both in the development of atomism (Lucretius was an important influence on Pierre Gassendi)[5] and the efforts of various figures of the Enlightenment era to construct a new Christian humanism.

Life

[edit]

And now, good Memmius, receptive ears
And keen intelligence detached from cares
I pray you bring to true philosophy

De rerum natura (tr. Melville) 1.50

If I must speak, my noble Memmius,
As nature's majesty now known demands

De rerum natura (tr. Melville) 5.6

Virtually nothing is known about the life of Lucretius, and there is insufficient basis for a confident assertion of the dates of Lucretius's birth or death in other sources. Another, yet briefer, note is found in the Chronicon of Donatus's pupil, Jerome. Writing four centuries after Lucretius's death, he enters under the 171st Olympiad: "Titus Lucretius the poet is born."[6] If Jerome is accurate about Lucretius's age (43) when Lucretius died (discussed below), then it may be concluded he was born in 99 or 98 BC.[7][8] Less specific estimates place the birth of Lucretius in the 90s BC and his death in the 50s BC,[9][10] in agreement with the poem's many allusions to the tumultuous state of political affairs in Rome and its civil strife.

Start of late 15th-century illuminated manuscript of De rerum natura

Lucretius probably was a member of the aristocratic gens Lucretia, and his work shows an intimate knowledge of the luxurious lifestyle in Rome.[11] Lucretius's love of the countryside invites speculation that he inhabited family-owned rural estates, as did many wealthy Roman families, and he certainly was expensively educated with a mastery of Latin, Greek, literature, and philosophy.[11]

A brief biographical note is found in Aelius Donatus's Life of Virgil, which seems to be derived from an earlier work by Suetonius.[12] The note reads: "The first years of his life Virgil spent in Cremona until the assumption of his toga virilis on his 17th birthday (when the same two men held the consulate as when he was born), and it so happened that on the very same day Lucretius the poet passed away." However, although Lucretius certainly lived and died around the time that Virgil and Cicero flourished, the information in this particular testimony is internally inconsistent: if Virgil was born in 70 BC, his 17th birthday would be in 53. The two consuls of 70 BC, Pompey and Crassus, stood together as consuls again in 55, not 53.

Another note regarding Lucretius's biography is found in Jerome's Chronicon, where he contends that Lucretius "was driven mad by a love potion, and when, during the intervals of his insanity, he had written a number of books, which were later emended by Cicero, he killed himself by his own hand in the 44th year of his life."[6] The claim that he was driven mad by a love potion, although defended by such scholars as Reale and Catan,[13] is often dismissed as the result of historical confusion,[2] or anti-Epicurean bias.[14] In some accounts the administration of the toxic aphrodisiac is attributed to his wife Lucilia. Regardless, Jerome's image of Lucretius as a lovesick, mad poet continued to have significant influence on modern scholarship until quite recently, although it now is accepted that such a report is inaccurate.[15]

De rerum natura

[edit]

His poem De rerum natura (usually translated as "On the Nature of Things" or "On the Nature of the Universe") transmits the ideas of Epicureanism, which includes atomism and cosmology. Lucretius was the first writer known to introduce Roman readers to Epicurean philosophy.[16] The poem, written in some 7,400 dactylic hexameters, is divided into six untitled books, and explores Epicurean physics through richly poetic language and metaphors. Lucretius presents the principles of atomism, the nature of the mind and soul, explanations of sensation and thought, the development of the world and its phenomena, and explains a variety of celestial and terrestrial phenomena. The universe described in the poem operates according to these physical principles, guided by fortuna, "chance", and not the divine intervention of the traditional Roman deities[17] and the religious explanations of the natural world.

Within this work, Lucretius makes reference to the cultural and technological development of humans in his use of available materials, tools, and weapons through prehistory to Lucretius's own time. He specifies the earliest weapons as hands, nails, and teeth. These were followed by stones, branches, and fire (once humans could kindle and control it). He then refers to "tough iron" and copper in that order, but goes on to say that copper was the primary means of tilling the soil and the basis of weaponry until, "by slow degrees", the iron sword became predominant (it still was in his day) and "the bronze sickle fell into disrepute" as iron ploughs were introduced.[1] He had earlier envisaged a pre-technological, pre-literary kind of human whose life was lived "in the fashion of wild beasts roaming at large".[18] From this beginning, he theorised, there followed the development in turn of crude huts, use and kindling of fire, clothing, language, family, and city-states. He believed that smelting of metal, and perhaps too, the firing of pottery, was discovered by accident: for example, the result of a forest fire. He does specify, however, that the use of copper followed the use of stones and branches and preceded the use of iron.[18]

Lucretius seems to equate copper with bronze, an alloy of copper and tin that has much greater resilience than copper; both copper and bronze were superseded by iron during his millennium (1000 BC to 1 BC). He may have considered bronze to be a stronger variety of copper and not necessarily a wholly individual material. Lucretius is believed to be the first to put forward a theory of the successive uses of first wood and stone, then copper and bronze, and finally iron. Although his theory lay dormant for many centuries, it was revived in the nineteenth century and he has been credited with originating the concept of the three-age system that was formalised from 1834 by C. J. Thomsen.[19]

Reception

[edit]

In a letter by Cicero to his brother Quintus in February 54 BC, Cicero said: "The poems of Lucretius are as you write: they exhibit many flashes of genius, and yet show great mastership."[20] In the work of another author in late Republican Rome, Virgil writes in the second book of his Georgics, apparently referring to Lucretius,[21] "Happy is he who has discovered the causes of things and has cast beneath his feet[a] all fears, unavoidable fate, and the din of the devouring Underworld."[22]

Natural philosophy

[edit]

Lucretius was an early thinker in what grew to become the study of evolution. He believed that nature experiments endlessly across the aeons, and the organisms that adapt best to their environment have the best chance of surviving. Living organisms survived because of the commensurate relationship between their strength, speed, or intellect and the external dynamics of their environment. Prior to Charles Darwin's 1859 publication of On the Origin of Species, the natural philosophy of Lucretius typified one of the foremost non-teleological and mechanistic accounts of the creation and evolution of life.[23] In contrast to modern thought on the subject, he did not believe that new species evolved from previously existing ones. Lucretius challenged the assumption that humans are necessarily superior to animals, noting that mammalian mothers in the wild recognize and nurture their offspring as do human mothers.[24]

Despite his advocacy of empiricism and his many correct conjectures about atomism and the nature of the physical world, Lucretius concludes his first book stressing the absurdity of the (by then well-established) spherical Earth theory[25] as it related to the personally favored infinite Earth hypothesis which did not make reference to outer bodies.[26][27]

While Epicurus left open the possibility for free will by arguing for the uncertainty of the paths of atoms, Lucretius viewed the soul or mind as emerging from fortuitous arrangements of distinct particles.[28]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ subiecit pedibus; cf. Lucretius 1.78: religio pedibus subiecta, "religion lies cast beneath our feet"

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Lucretius. De rerum natura, Book V, around Line 1200 ff.
  2. ^ a b Melville & Fowler (2008), p. xii.
  3. ^ Reckford, K. J. Some studies in Horace's odes on love
  4. ^ Greenblatt (2009), p. 44.
  5. ^ Fisher, Saul (2009). "Pierre Gassendi". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  6. ^ a b Jerome, Chronicon.
  7. ^ Bailey (1947), pp. 1–3.
  8. ^ Smith (1992), pp. x–xi.
  9. ^ Kenney (1971), p. 6.
  10. ^ Costa (1984), p. ix.
  11. ^ a b Melville & Fowler (2008), Foreword.
  12. ^ Horsfall (2000), p. 3.
  13. ^ Reale & Catan (1980), p. 414.
  14. ^ Smith (2011), p. vii.
  15. ^ Gale (2007), p. 2.
  16. ^ Gale (2007), p. 35.
  17. ^ In particular, De rerum natura 5.107 (fortuna gubernans, "guiding chance" or "fortune at the helm"): see Monica R. Gale, Myth and Poetry in Lucretius (Cambridge University Press, 1994, 1996 reprint), pp. 213, 223–224 online and Lucretius (Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 238 online.
  18. ^ a b Lucretius. De rerum natura, Book V, around line 940 ff.
  19. ^ Barnes, pp. 27–28.
  20. ^ Cicero, 2.9.
  21. ^ Smith (1975), intro.
  22. ^ Virgil, 2.490.
  23. ^ Campbell, Gordon (2003). Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De rerum natura 5.772-1104. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 3–6. ISBN 0199263965.
  24. ^ Massaro, Alma (2014-11-11). "The Living in Lucretius' De rerum natura. Animals' ataraxia and Humans' Distress". Relations. Beyond Anthropocentrism. 2 (2): 45–58. doi:10.7358/rela-2014-002-mass. ISSN 2280-9643.
  25. ^ Hannam, James (29 April 2019). "Atoms and flat-earth ethics". Aeon. Archived from the original on 29 April 2019. Retrieved 8 May 2019.
  26. ^ Sedley, David N. (2003). Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 78–82. ISBN 978-0-521-54214-2.
  27. ^ Lucretius, De rerum natura, 1.1052–82.
  28. ^ Gillispie, Charles Coulston (1960). The Edge of Objectivity: An Essay in the History of Scientific Ideas. Princeton University Press. p. 98. ISBN 0-691-02350-6.

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
  • Madigan, Tim; Suits, David B., eds. (2011). Lucretius: his continuing influence and contemporary relevance. Rochester, NY: RIT Press. ISBN 978-1-933360-49-2.
[edit]