Nimitz-class aircraft carrier: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit |
No edit summary |
||
(48 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{Infobox ship image |
{{Infobox ship image |
||
| Ship image = USS Nimitz in Victoria Canada 036.jpg |
| Ship image = USS Nimitz in Victoria Canada 036.jpg |
||
| Ship caption = USS |
| Ship caption = {{USS|Nimitz}} (CVN-68), lead ship of the class of supercarriers, at sea near [[Victoria, British Columbia]], after the 1999–2001 refit |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Infobox ship class overview |
{{Infobox ship class overview |
||
| Name = ''Nimitz''-class aircraft carrier |
| Name = ''Nimitz''-class aircraft carrier |
||
| Builders = [[Newport News Shipbuilding Company]] |
| Builders = [[Newport News Shipbuilding Company]] |
||
| Operators = {{ |
| Operators = {{naval|United States}} |
||
| Class before = * {{sclass|Kitty Hawk|aircraft carrier|4}} and |
| Class before = * {{sclass|Kitty Hawk|aircraft carrier|4}} and |
||
* {{sclass|Enterprise|aircraft carrier|4}} |
* {{sclass|Enterprise|aircraft carrier|4}} |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| Subclasses = * [[#Design differences within the class|''Theodore Roosevelt'' class]] and |
| Subclasses = * [[#Design differences within the class|''Theodore Roosevelt'' class]] and |
||
* [[#Design differences within the class|''Ronald Reagan'' class]] |
* [[#Design differences within the class|''Ronald Reagan'' class]] |
||
| Cost = US$ |
| Cost = US$1.98 billion in 1975<ref name="Navy.mil CVN"/> (${{Inflation|US-GDP|8.5|2012|r=1}} billion in {{Inflation-year|US-GDP}}){{Inflation/fn|US-GDP}} |
||
| Built range = |
| Built range = 1968–2006 |
||
| In service range = |
| In service range = 1975–present |
||
| In commission range = 3 May 1975 |
| In commission range = 3 May 1975 |
||
| Total ships building = |
| Total ships building = |
||
| Total ships planned = 10 |
| Total ships planned = 10 |
||
| Total ships completed = 10 |
| Total ships completed = 10 |
||
| Total ships in commission = 10 |
| Total ships in commission = 10 |
||
| Total ships active = 10 |
| Total ships active = 10 |
||
| Total ships laid up = |
| Total ships laid up = |
||
| Total ships lost = |
| Total ships lost = |
||
| Total ships retired = |
| Total ships retired = |
||
| Total ships preserved = |
| Total ships preserved = |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Infobox ship characteristics |
{{Infobox ship characteristics |
||
| Hide header = |
| Hide header = |
||
| Header caption = |
| Header caption = |
||
| Ship type = [[Aircraft carrier]] |
| Ship type = [[Aircraft carrier]] |
||
| Ship tonnage = |
| Ship tonnage = |
||
| Ship displacement = {{Convert|100000|to(-)|104600|LT|MT}} full load<ref name="Polmar">Polmar, p. 112</ref> |
| Ship displacement = {{Convert|100000|to(-)|104600|LT|MT}} full load<ref name="Polmar">Polmar 2004, p. 112</ref> |
||
| Ship length = {{Nimitz class aircraft carrier length}} |
| Ship length = {{Nimitz class aircraft carrier length}} |
||
| Ship beam = {{Nimitz class aircraft carrier beam}} |
| Ship beam = {{Nimitz class aircraft carrier beam}} |
||
| Ship height = |
| Ship height = |
||
| Ship draft = {{Nimitz class aircraft carrier draught}} |
| Ship draft = {{Nimitz class aircraft carrier draught}} |
||
| Ship depth = |
| Ship depth = |
||
| Ship hold depth = |
| Ship hold depth = |
||
| Ship decks = |
| Ship decks = |
||
| Ship deck clearance = |
| Ship deck clearance = |
||
| Ship ramps = |
| Ship ramps = |
||
| Ship ice class = |
| Ship ice class = |
||
| Ship power = |
| Ship power = |
||
| Ship propulsion = {{Nimitz class aircraft carrier propulsion}} |
| Ship propulsion = {{Nimitz class aircraft carrier propulsion}} |
||
| Ship sail plan = |
| Ship sail plan = |
||
| Ship speed = {{Nimitz class aircraft carrier speed}} |
| Ship speed = {{Nimitz class aircraft carrier speed}} |
||
| Ship range = {{Nuclear ship range}} |
| Ship range = {{Nuclear ship range}} |
||
| Ship endurance = |
| Ship endurance = |
||
| Ship boats = |
| Ship boats = |
||
| Ship capacity = |
| Ship capacity = |
||
| Ship troops = |
| Ship troops = |
||
| Ship complement = {{Nimitz class aircraft carrier complement}} |
| Ship complement = {{Nimitz class aircraft carrier complement}} |
||
| Ship crew = 5,000–5,200<ref name="Navy.mil CVN"/> (including airwing) |
| Ship crew = 5,000–5,200<ref name="Navy.mil CVN"/> (including airwing) |
||
| Ship time to activate = |
| Ship time to activate = |
||
| Ship sensors = {{Nimitz class aircraft carrier sensors I}} |
| Ship sensors = {{Nimitz class aircraft carrier sensors I}} |
||
| Ship EW = {{Nimitz class aircraft carrier EW}} |
| Ship EW = {{Nimitz class aircraft carrier EW}} |
||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
| Ship armor = {{convert|2.5|in|mm|abbr=on}} [[Kevlar]] over vital spaces<ref name="Fontenoy">{{cite book |title=Aircraft carriers: an illustrated history of their impact |last=Fontenoy |first=Paul E. |year=2006 |publisher=ABC-CLIO Ltd |isbn=978-1-85109-573-5 |page=[https://archive.org/details/aircraftcarriers00font/page/n358 349] |url=https://archive.org/details/aircraftcarriers00font|url-access=limited }}</ref> |
| Ship armor = {{convert|2.5|in|mm|abbr=on}} [[Kevlar]] over vital spaces<ref name="Fontenoy">{{cite book |title=Aircraft carriers: an illustrated history of their impact |last=Fontenoy |first=Paul E. |year=2006 |publisher=ABC-CLIO Ltd |isbn=978-1-85109-573-5 |page=[https://archive.org/details/aircraftcarriers00font/page/n358 349] |url=https://archive.org/details/aircraftcarriers00font|url-access=limited }}</ref> |
||
| Ship aircraft = 85–{{Nimitz class aircraft carrier aircraft}}<ref name="ship encyclopedia"/> |
| Ship aircraft = 85–{{Nimitz class aircraft carrier aircraft}}<ref name="ship encyclopedia"/> |
||
| Ship aircraft facilities = |
| Ship aircraft facilities = |
||
| Ship notes = |
| Ship notes = |
||
}} |
}} |
||
|} |
|} |
||
The '''''Nimitz'' class''' is a [[ |
The '''''Nimitz'' class''' is a [[ship class|class]] of ten [[Nuclear marine propulsion|nuclear-powered]] [[aircraft carrier]]s [[Modern United States Navy carrier air operations|in service with]] the [[United States Navy]]. The [[lead ship]] of the class is named after [[World War II]] [[United States Pacific Fleet]] commander [[Fleet admiral (United States)|Fleet Admiral]] [[Chester W. Nimitz]], who was the last living U.S. Navy officer to hold the rank. With an overall length of {{convert|1092|ft|m|abbr=on}} and a full-load [[displacement (ship)|displacement]] of over {{convert|100000|LT}},<ref name="Polmar"/> the ''Nimitz''-class ships were the largest warships built and in service until {{USS|Gerald R. Ford}} entered the fleet in 2017.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://list25.com/25-largest-warships-in-history/5/ |title=25 Largest Warships In History |publisher=Science & Technology |date=April 5, 2017 |access-date=April 11, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180412001336/https://list25.com/25-largest-warships-in-history/5/ |archive-date=12 April 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
Instead of the gas turbines or [[diesel–electric powertrain#Ships|diesel–electric systems]] used for propulsion on many modern warships, the carriers use two [[A4W reactor|A4W]] [[pressurized water reactor]]s. The reactors produce steam to drive steam turbines which drive four propeller shafts and can produce a maximum speed of over {{convert|30|kn|lk=in}} and a maximum power of around {{convert|260000|shp|MW|lk=in}}. As a result of nuclear power, the ships are capable of operating for over 20 years without refueling and are predicted to have a service life of over 50 years. They are categorized as nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and are numbered with consecutive [[hull number]]s from CVN-68 to CVN-77.<ref group=Note>The letters "CVN" denote the type of ship: "CV" is the [[hull classification symbol]] for aircraft carriers, and "N" indicates [[nuclear-power]]ed propulsion. The number after the "CVN" means that this is the 68th "CV", or large aircraft carrier.</ref> |
|||
All ten carriers were constructed by [[Northrop Grumman Newport News|Newport News Shipbuilding Company]] in [[Virginia]]. {{USS|Nimitz |
All ten carriers were constructed by [[Northrop Grumman Newport News|Newport News Shipbuilding Company]] in [[Virginia]]. {{USS|Nimitz}}, the [[lead ship]] of the class, was [[Ship commissioning|commissioned]] on 3 May 1975, and {{USS|George H.W. Bush}}, the tenth and last of the class, was commissioned on 10 January 2009. Since the 1970s, ''Nimitz''-class carriers have participated in many conflicts and operations across the world, including [[Operation Eagle Claw]] in Iran, the [[Gulf War]], and more recently in [[Iraq War|Iraq]] and [[War in Afghanistan (2001–present)|Afghanistan]]. |
||
The angled [[flight deck]]s of the carriers use a [[CATOBAR]] arrangement to operate aircraft, with [[aircraft catapult|steam catapults]] and [[arresting gear|arrestor wires]] for launch and recovery. As well as speeding up flight deck operations, this allows for a much wider variety of aircraft than with the [[STOVL]] arrangement used on smaller carriers. An embarked [[carrier air wing]] comprising around 64 aircraft is normally deployed on board. The air wings' [[strike fighter]]s are primarily [[Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet|F/A-18E and F/A-18F Super Hornets]]. In addition to their aircraft, the vessels carry short-range defensive weaponry for [[anti-aircraft warfare]] and missile defense. |
The angled [[flight deck]]s of the carriers use a [[CATOBAR]] arrangement to operate aircraft, with [[aircraft catapult|steam catapults]] and [[arresting gear|arrestor wires]] for launch and recovery. As well as speeding up flight deck operations, this allows for a much wider variety of aircraft than with the [[STOVL]] arrangement used on smaller carriers. An embarked [[carrier air wing]] comprising around 64 aircraft is normally deployed on board. The air wings' [[strike fighter]]s are primarily [[Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet|F/A-18E and F/A-18F Super Hornets]]. In addition to their aircraft, the vessels carry short-range defensive weaponry for [[anti-aircraft warfare]] and missile defense. |
||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
===Design=== |
===Design=== |
||
The ''Nimitz''-class aircraft carriers were ordered to |
The ''Nimitz''-class aircraft carriers were ordered to supplement the aircraft carriers of the {{sclass|Kitty Hawk|aircraft carrier|5}} and {{sclass|Enterprise|aircraft carrier|4}}es, maintaining the strength and capability of the U.S. Navy after the older carriers were decommissioned.<ref name="CVN 21"/> The ships were designed to be improvements on previous [[List of aircraft carriers of the United States Navy|U.S. aircraft carriers]], particularly the ''[[USS Enterprise (CVN-65)|Enterprise]]'' and {{sclass|Forrestal|aircraft carrier|0}} supercarriers, although the arrangement of the vessels is relatively similar to that of the ''Kitty Hawk'' class.<ref name="Polmar 113">Polmar 2004, p. 113</ref> Among other design improvements, the two reactors on ''Nimitz''-class carriers take up less space than the eight reactors used on ''Enterprise''. Along with a more generally improved design, ''Nimitz''-class carriers can carry 90% more aviation fuel and 50% more ordnance when compared to the ''Forrestal'' class.<ref>Labayle Couhat 1980, p. 630</ref> |
||
The U.S. Navy has stated that the carriers could withstand three times the damage sustained by the {{sclass|Essex|aircraft carrier|4}} inflicted by Japanese air attacks during [[World War II]].<ref name="ship encyclopedia">{{cite book |title=The Encyclopedia of Ships |last=Gibbons |first=Tony |year=2001 |publisher=Amber Books |location=London, United Kingdom |isbn=978-1-905704-43-9 |page=444 }}</ref> The hangars on the ships are divided into three fire bays by thick steel doors that are designed to restrict the spread of fire. This addition has been present on U.S. aircraft carriers since World War II, after the fires caused by [[kamikaze]] attacks.<ref name="Fire Protection">{{cite book|title=Aircraft Carrier Flight and Hangar Deck Fire Protection: History and Current Status |last1=Darwin |first1=Robert |last2=Bowman |first2=Howard |last3=Hunstad |first3=Mary |last4=Leach |first4=William |last5=Williams |first5=Frederick |year=2005 |url=http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA432176 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101202092111/http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA432176 |url-status=dead |archive-date=2 December 2010 |page=10 |publisher=Defense Technical Information Center |access-date=1 July 2011}}</ref> |
The U.S. Navy has stated that the carriers could withstand three times the damage sustained by the {{sclass|Essex|aircraft carrier|4}} inflicted by Japanese air attacks during [[World War II]].<ref name="ship encyclopedia">{{cite book |title=The Encyclopedia of Ships |last=Gibbons |first=Tony |year=2001 |publisher=Amber Books |location=London, United Kingdom |isbn=978-1-905704-43-9 |page=444 }}</ref> The hangars on the ships are divided into three fire bays by thick steel doors that are designed to restrict the spread of fire. This addition has been present on U.S. aircraft carriers since World War II, after the fires caused by [[kamikaze]] attacks.<ref name="Fire Protection">{{cite book|title=Aircraft Carrier Flight and Hangar Deck Fire Protection: History and Current Status |last1=Darwin |first1=Robert |last2=Bowman |first2=Howard |last3=Hunstad |first3=Mary |last4=Leach |first4=William |last5=Williams |first5=Frederick |year=2005 |url=http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA432176 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101202092111/http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA432176 |url-status=dead |archive-date=2 December 2010 |page=10 |publisher=Defense Technical Information Center |access-date=1 July 2011}}</ref> |
||
The first ships were designed around the time of the [[Vietnam War]], and certain aspects of the design were influenced by operations there. To a certain extent, the carrier operations in Vietnam demonstrated the need for increased capabilities of aircraft carriers over their survivability; they were used to send sorties into the war and were, therefore, less subject to attack. As a result of this experience, ''Nimitz''-class carriers were designed with larger stores of aviation fuel and larger [[Magazine (artillery)#Naval magazines|magazines]] compared to previous carriers, although this was partly a result of increased space available by the new design of the ships' propulsion systems.<ref name="Friedman p316">Friedman, p. 316</ref> |
The first ships were designed around the time of the [[Vietnam War]], and certain aspects of the design were influenced by operations there. To a certain extent, the carrier operations in Vietnam demonstrated the need for increased capabilities of aircraft carriers over their survivability; they were used to send sorties into the war and were, therefore, less subject to attack. As a result of this experience, ''Nimitz''-class carriers were designed with larger stores of aviation fuel and larger [[Magazine (artillery)#Naval magazines|magazines]] compared to previous carriers, although this was partly a result of increased space available by the new design of the ships' propulsion systems.<ref name="Friedman p316">Friedman 1983, p. 316</ref> |
||
A major purpose of the carriers was initially to support the U.S. military during the [[Cold War]]. They were designed with capabilities for that role, including using nuclear power instead of oil for greater endurance and the ability to adjust their weapons systems on the basis of new intelligence and technological developments.<ref>Jim Wilson "21st Century Carrier Force" ''[[Popular Mechanics]]'' October 1998, pp. 58–66</ref> They were initially categorized only as attack carriers, but ships have been constructed with [[Anti-submarine warfare|anti-submarine capabilities]] since {{USS|Carl Vinson|CVN-70|6}}.<ref name="ASW">{{cite web |url=http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/ARCHIVE/2003/JULY/Pages/7th_Fleet3817.aspx |title=7th Fleet Experiment Probes Navy's Near-Term Concerns |author=Sandra I. Erwin |date=July 2003 |publisher=[[National Defense Industrial Association]] |access-date=31 December 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101202024729/http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/ARCHIVE/2003/JULY/Pages/7th_Fleet3817.aspx |archive-date=2 December 2010 |df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.navyleague.org/sea_power/sep_03_12.php |title=Navy Should Bolster Crisis Planning for Theater ASW |author=Patricia Kime |date=September 2003 |publisher=[[Navy League of the United States]] |access-date=31 December 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100305125731/http://www.navyleague.org/sea_power/sep_03_12.php |archive-date=5 March 2010 |df=dmy-all }}</ref> As a result, the ships and their aircraft can participate in a wide range of operations, including sea and air blockades; [[Naval mine|mine]] laying; and missile strikes on land, air, and sea.<ref name="Cold war ship"/> |
A major purpose of the carriers was initially to support the U.S. military during the [[Cold War]]. They were designed with capabilities for that role, including using nuclear power instead of oil for greater endurance and the ability to adjust their weapons systems on the basis of new intelligence and technological developments.<ref>Jim Wilson "21st Century Carrier Force" ''[[Popular Mechanics]]'' October 1998, pp. 58–66</ref> They were initially categorized only as attack carriers, but ships have been constructed with [[Anti-submarine warfare|anti-submarine capabilities]] since {{USS|Carl Vinson|CVN-70|6}}.<ref name="ASW">{{cite web |url=http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/ARCHIVE/2003/JULY/Pages/7th_Fleet3817.aspx |title=7th Fleet Experiment Probes Navy's Near-Term Concerns |author=Sandra I. Erwin |date=July 2003 |publisher=[[National Defense Industrial Association]] |access-date=31 December 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101202024729/http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/ARCHIVE/2003/JULY/Pages/7th_Fleet3817.aspx |archive-date=2 December 2010 |df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.navyleague.org/sea_power/sep_03_12.php |title=Navy Should Bolster Crisis Planning for Theater ASW |author=Patricia Kime |date=September 2003 |publisher=[[Navy League of the United States]] |access-date=31 December 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100305125731/http://www.navyleague.org/sea_power/sep_03_12.php |archive-date=5 March 2010 |df=dmy-all }}</ref> As a result, the ships and their aircraft can participate in a wide range of operations, including sea and air blockades; [[Naval mine|mine]] laying; and missile strikes on land, air, and sea.<ref name="Cold war ship"/> |
||
Because of a design flaw, ships of this class have inherent [[List (watercraft)|lists]] to starboard when under combat loads that exceed the capability of their list control systems. The problem appears to be especially prevalent on some of the more modern vessels. This problem has been previously rectified by using damage control voids for ballast, but a solution using solid ballast that does not affect the ship's survivability has been proposed.<ref name=list>Wolfson, Dianna. "[https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/33439 A Solution to the Inherent List on Nimitz Class Aircraft Carriers] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180821145845/http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/33439 |
Because of a design flaw, ships of this class have inherent [[List (watercraft)|lists]] to starboard when under combat loads that exceed the capability of their list control systems. The problem appears to be especially prevalent on some of the more modern vessels. This problem has been previously rectified by using damage control voids for ballast, but a solution using solid ballast that does not affect the ship's survivability has been proposed.<ref name="list">[[Dianna Wolfson|Wolfson, Dianna]]. "[https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/33439 A Solution to the Inherent List on Nimitz Class Aircraft Carriers] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180821145845/http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/33439|date=21 August 2018}}" MIT thesis 2004</ref><ref name="Navy.mil CVN"/> |
||
<gallery class="center" widths="250px" heights="180px"> |
<gallery class="center" widths="250px" heights="180px"> |
||
File:Artist's impression of Nimitz-class aircraft carrier in 1968.jpg|An artist's impression of USS ''Nimitz'' in 1968 |
File:Artist's impression of Nimitz-class aircraft carrier in 1968.jpg|An artist's impression of USS ''Nimitz'' in 1968 |
||
Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
[[File:USS George Washington (CVN-73) propeller.jpg|thumb|upright|alt=Shipyard employees reattaching the bronze propeller of USS ''George Washington'' while in dry dock|One of the four propellers of ''George Washington'']] |
[[File:USS George Washington (CVN-73) propeller.jpg|thumb|upright|alt=Shipyard employees reattaching the bronze propeller of USS ''George Washington'' while in dry dock|One of the four propellers of ''George Washington'']] |
||
All ships of the class are powered by two [[A4W reactor|A4W nuclear reactors]], housed in separate compartments. The |
All ships of the class are powered by two [[A4W reactor|A4W nuclear reactors]], housed in separate compartments. The reactors produce heat through [[nuclear fission]], which heats water to produce steam. This is then passed through four turbines, which are shared by the two reactors. A [[Transmission (mechanics)|gearbox]] transmits power to four propeller shafts, producing a maximum speed of over {{convert|30|kn|km/h}} and maximum power of {{convert|260000|bhp|MW|lk=in|0}}.<ref name="ship encyclopedia"/> <!-- this part is commented out because it appears to be rumor, I cannot find any article citing such in Google. —Though actual top speeds are generally withheld for security purposes, in June 1999, the USN publicly released these trial speeds: ''Nimitz'': {{convert|31.5|knots}} ''Theodore Roosevelt'': {{convert|31.3knots}} ''Harry S. Truman'': {{convert|30.9|knots}} --> The turbines power the four [[bronze]] propellers, each with a diameter of {{convert|25|ft|m}} and a weight of {{convert|66000|lb|MT}}. Behind these are the two rudders, which are {{convert|29|ft|m}} high and {{convert|22|ft|m}} long, and each weighs {{convert|110000|lb|MT|abbr=off}}.<ref name="USN Info">{{cite web|url=http://www.public.navy.mil/usff/nctamspac/Pages/AboutUs.aspx |title=Information About Us |date=14 October 2009 |publisher=U.S. Navy |access-date=24 May 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101203050328/http://www.public.navy.mil/usff/nctamspac/Pages/AboutUs.aspx |archive-date=3 December 2010 }}</ref> |
||
The ''Nimitz''-class ships constructed since {{USS|Ronald Reagan|CVN-76|6}} also have [[bulbous bow]]s to improve speed and [[fuel efficiency]] by reducing [[wave-making resistance]].<ref>{{cite book |title=A Methodology for Estimating the Effect of Aircraft Carrier Operational Cycles on the Maintenance Industrial Base: Technical Report |last1=Yardley |first1=Roland |last2=Schank |first2=John |last3=Kallimani |first3=James |year=2007 |publisher=[[RAND Corporation]] |isbn=978-0-8330-4182-1 |page=30 }}</ref> As a result of nuclear power, the ships are capable of operating continuously for over 20 years without |
The ''Nimitz''-class ships constructed since {{USS|Ronald Reagan|CVN-76|6}} also have [[bulbous bow]]s to improve speed and [[fuel efficiency]] by reducing [[wave-making resistance]].<ref>{{cite book |title=A Methodology for Estimating the Effect of Aircraft Carrier Operational Cycles on the Maintenance Industrial Base: Technical Report |last1=Yardley |first1=Roland |last2=Schank |first2=John |last3=Kallimani |first3=James |year=2007 |publisher=[[RAND Corporation]] |isbn=978-0-8330-4182-1 |page=30 }}</ref> As a result of nuclear power, the ships are capable of operating continuously for over 20 years without refueling and are predicted to have a service life of over 50 years.<ref name="USN Info"/> |
||
===Armament and protection=== |
===Armament and protection=== |
||
[[File:USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) Sea Sparrow.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|alt=Firing of a missile from ''Theodore Roosevelt'' while at sea, seen from the flight deck. There is a Phalanx cannon on the left, with a white, domed upper section and a black cannon on the lower part.|The firing of a [[RIM-7 Sea Sparrow|Sea Sparrow missile]] from ''Theodore Roosevelt''. A [[Phalanx CIWS]] is in the left of the image.]] |
[[File:USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) Sea Sparrow.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|alt=Firing of a missile from ''Theodore Roosevelt'' while at sea, seen from the flight deck. There is a Phalanx cannon on the left, with a white, domed upper section and a black cannon on the lower part.|The firing of a [[RIM-7 Sea Sparrow|Sea Sparrow missile]] from ''Theodore Roosevelt''. A [[Phalanx CIWS]] is in the left of the image.]] |
||
[[File:US Navy 050615-N-8148A-063 The Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) activates her countermeasures wash down system as part of a series of test and evaluations to certify the vessel in the event of a chemical.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|The counter-measure wash-down system of ''Ronald Reagan'' being tested. This is part of the ship's [[CBRN|defense]] against chemical, biological or radiological threats, and also against fires]] |
[[File:US Navy 050615-N-8148A-063 The Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) activates her countermeasures wash down system as part of a series of test and evaluations to certify the vessel in the event of a chemical.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|The counter-measure wash-down system of ''Ronald Reagan'' being tested. This is part of the ship's [[CBRN|defense]] against chemical, biological or radiological threats, and also against fires]] |
||
In addition to the aircraft carried on board, the ships carry defensive equipment for use against missiles and hostile aircraft. These consist of either two or three [[RIM-7 Sea Sparrow]] or [[RIM-162 ESSM|RIM-162 Evolved SeaSparrow Missile]] Mk 29 missile launchers designed for |
In addition to the aircraft carried on board, the ships carry defensive equipment for use against missiles and hostile aircraft. These consist of either two or three [[RIM-7 Sea Sparrow]] or [[RIM-162 ESSM|RIM-162 Evolved SeaSparrow Missile]] Mk 29 missile launchers designed for defense against aircraft and [[anti-ship missile]]s, as well as either three or four 20 mm [[Phalanx CIWS]].<ref>Wertheim 2005, pp. 919–920</ref> |
||
USS ''Ronald Reagan'' has none of these, having been built with the Mk 49 Guided Missile Launching Systems for [[RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missile]]s, two of which have also been installed on {{USS|Nimitz|CVN-68|6}} and {{USS|George Washington|CVN-73|6}}. These will be installed on the other ships as they return for [[Refueling Complex Overhaul]] (RCOH).<ref name="ship encyclopedia"/><ref name="Navy.mil CVN"/> Since USS ''Theodore Roosevelt'', the carriers have been constructed with {{convert|2.5|in|mm|abbr=on}} [[Kevlar]] |
USS ''Ronald Reagan'' has none of these, having been built with the Mk 49 Guided Missile Launching Systems for [[RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missile]]s, two of which have also been installed on {{USS|Nimitz|CVN-68|6}} and {{USS|George Washington|CVN-73|6}}. These will be installed on the other ships as they return for [[Refueling Complex Overhaul]] (RCOH).<ref name="ship encyclopedia"/><ref name="Navy.mil CVN"/> Since USS ''Theodore Roosevelt'', the carriers have been constructed with {{convert|2.5|in|mm|abbr=on}} [[Kevlar]] armor over vital spaces, and earlier ships have been retrofitted with it: ''Nimitz'' in 1983–1984, ''Dwight D. Eisenhower'' from 1985 to 1987 and ''Carl Vinson'' in 1989.<ref name="Fontenoy"/><ref>Wertheim 2007, p. 884</ref> |
||
The ships' other countermeasures are four Sippican [[SRBOC]] (super rapid bloom off-board [[chaff]]) six-barrel |
The ships' other countermeasures are four Sippican [[SRBOC]] (super rapid bloom off-board [[chaff]]) six-barrel Mk 36 decoy launchers, which deploy infrared [[Flare (countermeasure)|flares]] and [[Chaff (countermeasure)|chaff]] to disrupt the sensors of incoming missiles; an SSTDS torpedo defense system; and an [[AN/SLQ-25 Nixie]] torpedo countermeasures system. The carriers also use [[AN/SLQ-32 Electronic Warfare Suite|AN/SLQ-32(V)]] [[Radar jamming and deception|jamming]] systems to detect and disrupt hostile [[radar]] signals in addition to the [[electronic warfare]] capabilities of some of the aircraft on board.<ref>Wertheim 2007, p. 885</ref><ref>Polmar 2004, p. 108</ref> |
||
The presence of [[Tactical nuclear weapon|nuclear weapon]]s on board U.S. aircraft carriers since the end of the Cold War has neither been confirmed nor denied by the U.S. government. As a result, the presence of a U.S. aircraft carrier in a foreign port has occasionally provoked protest from local people, for example, when ''Nimitz'' visited [[Chennai]], India, in 2007. At that time, the Strike Group commander [[Rear admiral (United States)|Rear Admiral]] John Terence Blake stated, "The U.S. policy [ |
The presence of [[Tactical nuclear weapon|nuclear weapon]]s on board U.S. aircraft carriers since the end of the Cold War has neither been confirmed nor denied by the U.S. government. As a result, the presence of a U.S. aircraft carrier in a foreign port has occasionally provoked protest from local people, for example, when ''Nimitz'' visited [[Chennai]], India, in 2007. At that time, the Strike Group commander [[Rear admiral (United States)|Rear Admiral]] John Terence Blake stated, "The U.S. policy [...] is that we do not routinely deploy nuclear weapons on board ''Nimitz''."<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.indianexpress.com/news/nimitz-docks-off-chennai-to-build-new-relat/203639/ |title=Nimitz docks off Chennai to 'build new relations with India' |date= 3 July 2007 |newspaper=[[The Indian Express]] |access-date=11 January 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2414/stories/20070727000806200.htm |title=NAM and Nimitz |date=14–27 July 2007 |magazine=[[Frontline (magazine)|Frontline]] |access-date=11 January 2010 |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101209044846/http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2414/stories/20070727000806200.htm |archive-date=9 December 2010 |df=dmy-all }}</ref> |
||
In May 2013, ''George H.W. Bush'' conducted the first carrier-borne end-to-end at-sea test of the Surface Ship Torpedo |
In May 2013, ''George H.W. Bush'' conducted the first carrier-borne end-to-end at-sea test of the Surface Ship Torpedo Defense System (SSTDS). The SSTDS combined the passive detection of the Torpedo Warning System (TWS) that finds, classifies, and tracks torpedoes with the hard-kill capability of a Countermeasure Anti-Torpedo (CAT), an encapsulated miniature torpedo designed to locate, home in on, and destroy hostile torpedoes.<ref>[http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=74665 First Carrier Countermeasure Anti-Torpedo Launched] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150727112816/http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=74665 |date=27 July 2015 }} – Navy.mil, 6 June 2013</ref> This was to increase protection against wake-homing torpedoes like the [[Type 53 torpedo|Type 53]] that do not respond to acoustic decoys. The pieces of the SSTDS were engineered to locate and destroy incoming torpedoes in a matter of seconds; each system included one TWS and 8 CATs. Initial operational capability (IOC) was planned for 2019, and all aircraft carriers were to be outfitted by 2035.<ref>[http://news.usni.org/2013/06/20/navy-develops-torpedo-killing-torpedo Navy Develops Torpedo Killing Torpedo] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151208120511/http://news.usni.org/2013/06/20/navy-develops-torpedo-killing-torpedo |date=8 December 2015 }} – News.USNI.org, 20 June 2013</ref><ref>[http://defensetech.org/2013/10/28/navy-deploying-new-anti-torpedo-technology/ Navy Deploying New Anti-Torpedo Technology] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151208094936/http://defensetech.org/2013/10/28/navy-deploying-new-anti-torpedo-technology/ |date=8 December 2015 }} – Defensetech.org, 28 October 2013</ref><ref>[http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/year-2015-news/march-2015-navy-naval-forces-defense-industry-technology-maritime-security-global-news/2495-us-navy-continues-work-on-torpedo-warning-systemcountermeasure-anti-torpedo-system.html US Navy Continues Work on Torpedo Warning System/Countermeasure Anti-Torpedo System] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151208174617/http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/year-2015-news/march-2015-navy-naval-forces-defense-industry-technology-maritime-security-global-news/2495-us-navy-continues-work-on-torpedo-warning-systemcountermeasure-anti-torpedo-system.html |date=8 December 2015 }} – Navyrecognition.com, 12 March 2015</ref> The Navy suspended work on the project in September 2018 due to poor reliability of the components; hardware, already installed on five carriers, is to be removed by 2023.<ref>[https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2018/navy/2018sstd_tws_cat.pdf?ver=2019-08-21-155651-040 Surface Ship Torpedo Defense (SSTD) System]. ''[[Director, Operational Test and Evaluation|Office of the Director of Test and Evaluation]]''. FY18 NAVY PROGRAMS.</ref><ref>[https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26347/the-navy-is-ripping-out-underperforming-anti-torpedo-torpedoes-from-its-supercarriers The Navy Is Ripping Out Underperforming Anti-Torpedo Torpedoes From Its Supercarriers]. ''The Drive.com/The War Zone''. 5 February 2019.</ref> |
||
===Carrier air wing=== |
===Carrier air wing=== |
||
{{Main|Carrier air wing}} |
{{Main|Carrier air wing}} |
||
[[File:USS Harry S. Truman (CVN-75) flight deck.jpg|thumb|An [[F/A-18 Hornet]] launches from the flight deck of '' |
[[File:USS Harry S. Truman (CVN-75) flight deck.jpg|thumb|An [[F/A-18 Hornet]] launches from the flight deck of ''Harry S. Truman''. Other aircraft are stored on deck.]] |
||
In order for a carrier to deploy, it must embark one of ten Carrier Air Wings (CVW).<ref group=Note>Although there are ten carrier air wings in the U.S. Navy, they are numbered between CVW-1 (USS ''Enterprise'') and CVW-17 (USS ''Carl Vinson'').</ref> The carriers can accommodate a maximum of 130 F/A-18 Hornets<ref>"[http://www.fas.org/man/gao/nsiad98001/ns98001.pdf Navy Aircraft Carriers: Cost Effectiveness of Conventionally and Nuclear-powered Carriers] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111018083346/http://www.fas.org/man/gao/nsiad98001/ns98001.pdf |date=18 October 2011 }}</ref> or 85–90 aircraft of different types, but current numbers are typically 64 aircraft. Although the air wings are integrated with the operation of the carriers they are deployed to, they are regarded as separate entities. As well as the aircrew, the air wings are also made up of support personnel involved in roles including maintenance, aircraft and ordnance handling, and emergency procedures. Each person on the flight deck wears color-coded clothing to make their role easily identifiable.{{ |
In order for a carrier to deploy, it must embark one of ten Carrier Air Wings (CVW).<ref group=Note>Although there are ten carrier air wings in the U.S. Navy, they are numbered between CVW-1 (USS ''Enterprise'') and CVW-17 (USS ''Carl Vinson'').</ref> The carriers can accommodate a maximum of 130 F/A-18 Hornets<ref>"[http://www.fas.org/man/gao/nsiad98001/ns98001.pdf Navy Aircraft Carriers: Cost Effectiveness of Conventionally and Nuclear-powered Carriers] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111018083346/http://www.fas.org/man/gao/nsiad98001/ns98001.pdf |date=18 October 2011 }}</ref> or 85–90 aircraft of different types, but current numbers are typically 64 aircraft. Although the air wings are integrated with the operation of the carriers they are deployed to, they are regarded as separate entities. As well as the aircrew, the air wings are also made up of support personnel involved in roles including maintenance, aircraft and ordnance handling, and emergency procedures. Each person on the flight deck wears color-coded clothing to make their role easily identifiable.<ref>{{Cite web |title=RAINBOW JERSEYS: A Guide to the color-coded wardrobe on a U.S. Navy Flight Deck |url=https://www.history.navy.mil/content/dam/nhhc/news-and-events/multimedia%20gallery/Infographics/FINAL_RainbowJerseys_highres_PDF.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314105120/https://www.history.navy.mil/content/dam/nhhc/news-and-events/multimedia%20gallery/Infographics/FINAL_RainbowJerseys_highres_PDF.pdf |archive-date=2023-03-14 |access-date=2023-05-24 |publisher=[[Naval History and Heritage Command]]}}</ref> |
||
A typical carrier air wing can include 24–36 [[Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet|F/A-18E or F Super Hornet]]s as strike fighters; two squadrons of 10–12 [[F/A-18 Hornet|F/A-18C Hornets]], with one of these often provided by the [[United States Marine Corps|U.S. Marine Corps]] (VMFA), also as strike fighters; 4–6 [[Boeing EA-18G Growler|EA-18G Growlers]] for electronic warfare; 4–6 [[E-2 Hawkeye|E-2C or D Hawkeyes]] for [[airborne early warning]] (AEW), [[C-2 Greyhound]]s used for logistics (to be replaced by [[MV-22 Osprey]]s); and a Helicopter Anti-Submarine Squadron of 6–8 [[SH-60 Seahawk|SH-60F and HH-60H Seahawks]]. Aircraft previously operated from ''Nimitz''-class carriers include [[F-4 Phantom]]s, [[A-5 Vigilante|RA-5C Vigilante]]s, [[F-8 Crusader|RF-8G Crusader]]s, [[F-14 Tomcat]]s, [[S-3 Viking]]s, [[EA-3B Skywarrior]]s, [[EA-6B Prowler]]s, [[A-7 Corsair II]], and [[A-6E Intruder]] aircraft.<ref>Lambeth, p. 89{{cite book |title=American Carrier Air Power at the Dawn of a New Century |last=Lambeth |first=Benjamin |year=2005 |publisher=RAND Corporation |isbn=0-8330-3842-7 |page=138 }}</ref>{{update inline|date=July 2021}} |
A typical carrier air wing can include 24–36 [[Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet|F/A-18E or F Super Hornet]]s as strike fighters; two squadrons of 10–12 [[F/A-18 Hornet|F/A-18C Hornets]], with one of these often provided by the [[United States Marine Corps|U.S. Marine Corps]] (VMFA), also as strike fighters; 4–6 [[Boeing EA-18G Growler|EA-18G Growlers]] for electronic warfare; 4–6 [[E-2 Hawkeye|E-2C or D Hawkeyes]] for [[airborne early warning]] (AEW), [[C-2 Greyhound]]s used for logistics (to be replaced by [[MV-22 Osprey]]s); and a Helicopter Anti-Submarine Squadron of 6–8 [[SH-60 Seahawk|SH-60F and HH-60H Seahawks]]. Aircraft previously operated from ''Nimitz''-class carriers include [[F-4 Phantom]]s, [[A-5 Vigilante|RA-5C Vigilante]]s, [[F-8 Crusader|RF-8G Crusader]]s, [[F-14 Tomcat]]s, [[S-3 Viking]]s, [[EA-3B Skywarrior]]s, [[EA-6B Prowler]]s, [[A-7 Corsair II]], and [[A-6E Intruder]] aircraft.<ref>Lambeth 2005, p. 89{{cite book |title=American Carrier Air Power at the Dawn of a New Century |last=Lambeth |first=Benjamin |year=2005 |publisher=RAND Corporation |isbn=0-8330-3842-7 |page=138 }}</ref>{{update inline|date=July 2021}} |
||
===Flight deck and aircraft facilities=== |
===Flight deck and aircraft facilities=== |
||
[[File:US Navy 090529-N-1062H-042 Supply and deck department Sailors transfer cargo in the hangar bay of the aircraft carrier USS George Washington (CVN 73) during a replenishment-at-sea.jpg|thumb|The hangar of ''George Washington'' during a replenishment at sea, 2009]] |
[[File:US Navy 090529-N-1062H-042 Supply and deck department Sailors transfer cargo in the hangar bay of the aircraft carrier USS George Washington (CVN 73) during a replenishment-at-sea.jpg|thumb|The hangar of ''George Washington'' during a replenishment at sea, 2009]] |
||
The [[flight deck]] is angled at nine degrees, which allows for aircraft to be launched and recovered simultaneously. This angle of the flight deck was reduced slightly compared to previous carriers, as the current design improves the airflow around the carrier.<ref name="Friedman p316"/> Four steam [[Aircraft catapult|catapults]] are used to launch fixed-wing aircraft, and four [[arrestor wire]]s are used for recovery. The two newest carriers, |
The [[flight deck]] is angled at nine degrees, which allows for aircraft to be launched and recovered simultaneously. This angle of the flight deck was reduced slightly compared to previous carriers, as the current design improves the airflow around the carrier.<ref name="Friedman p316"/> Four steam [[Aircraft catapult|catapults]] are used to launch fixed-wing aircraft, and four [[arrestor wire]]s are used for recovery. The two newest carriers, ''Ronald Reagan'' and ''George H.W. Bush'', have only three arrestor wires each, as the fourth was used infrequently on earlier ships and was therefore deemed unnecessary.<ref>Polmar 2004, p. 111</ref> |
||
This [[CATOBAR]] arrangement allows for faster launching and recovery as well as a much wider range of aircraft that can be used on board compared with smaller aircraft carriers, most of which use a simpler [[STOVL]] arrangement without catapults or arrestor wires. The ship's aircraft operations are controlled by the air boss from Primary Flight Control or Pri-Fly. Four large elevators transport aircraft between the flight deck and the hangars below. These hangars are divided into three bays by thick steel doors that are designed to restrict the spread of fire.<ref name="Fire Protection"/> |
This [[CATOBAR]] arrangement allows for faster launching and recovery as well as a much wider range of aircraft that can be used on board compared with smaller aircraft carriers, most of which use a simpler [[STOVL]] arrangement without catapults or arrestor wires. The ship's aircraft operations are controlled by the air boss from Primary Flight Control or Pri-Fly. Four large elevators transport aircraft between the flight deck and the hangars below. These hangars are divided into three bays by thick steel doors that are designed to restrict the spread of fire.<ref name="Fire Protection"/> |
||
Line 148: | Line 148: | ||
[[File:George Washington Carrier Strike Group.jpg|thumb|alt=Four warships sailing alongside ''George Washington''|The ''George Washington'' carrier strike group in the [[Caribbean Sea]], 2006]] |
[[File:George Washington Carrier Strike Group.jpg|thumb|alt=Four warships sailing alongside ''George Washington''|The ''George Washington'' carrier strike group in the [[Caribbean Sea]], 2006]] |
||
When an aircraft carrier deploys, it takes a Carrier Strike Group (CSG), made up of several other warships and supply vessels that allow the operation to be carried out. The armament of the ''Nimitz'' class is made up only of short-range defensive weapons, used as a last line of defense against enemy missiles and aircraft. As with all surface ships, an aircraft carrier is particularly vulnerable to attack from below, specifically from submarines. An aircraft carrier is a very expensive, hard to replace, and strategically valuable asset, and therefore it logically has immense value as a target.<ref name="Stevens, p. 24">Stevens, p. 24</ref> |
When an aircraft carrier deploys, it takes a Carrier Strike Group (CSG), made up of several other warships and supply vessels that allow the operation to be carried out. The armament of the ''Nimitz'' class is made up only of short-range defensive weapons, used as a last line of defense against enemy missiles and aircraft. As with all surface ships, an aircraft carrier is particularly vulnerable to attack from below, specifically from submarines. An aircraft carrier is a very expensive, hard to replace, and strategically valuable asset, and therefore it logically has immense value as a target.<ref name="Stevens, p. 24">Stevens 1998, p. 24</ref> |
||
As a result of its target value and vulnerability, aircraft carriers are always escorted by at least one submarine for protection. The other vessels in the Strike Group provide additional capabilities, such as long-range [[Tomahawk (missile)|Tomahawk]] missiles or the [[Aegis Combat System]], and protect the carrier from attack. A typical Strike Group may include, in addition to an aircraft carrier: up to six [[surface combatant]]s, including [[guided-missile cruiser]]s and [[guided-missile destroyer]]s, used primarily for [[anti-aircraft warfare]] and anti-submarine warfare, and [[frigate]]s/[[guided-missile frigate]]s, prior to their retirement from USN service. When the Navy commissions a [[FFG(X)|new class of frigates (FFG(X))]], they will again accompany CSGs. Also making up part of the group is one or two [[attack submarine]]s for seeking out and destroying hostile surface ships and submarines and an [[Fast combat support ship|ammunition, oiler, and supply ship]] from [[Military Sealift Command]] to provide logistical support.<ref name="Stevens, p. 24"/> The numbers and types of vessels that make up each strike group can vary from group to group, depending on deployments, mission, and availability.<ref>Polmar, p. 37</ref> |
As a result of its target value and vulnerability, aircraft carriers are always escorted by at least one submarine for protection. The other vessels in the Strike Group provide additional capabilities, such as long-range [[Tomahawk (missile family)|Tomahawk]] missiles or the [[Aegis Combat System]], and protect the carrier from attack. A typical Strike Group may include, in addition to an aircraft carrier: up to six [[surface combatant]]s, including [[guided-missile cruiser]]s and [[guided-missile destroyer]]s, used primarily for [[anti-aircraft warfare]] and anti-submarine warfare, and [[frigate]]s/[[guided-missile frigate]]s, prior to their retirement from USN service. When the Navy commissions a [[FFG(X)|new class of frigates (FFG(X))]], they will again accompany CSGs. Also making up part of the group is one or two [[attack submarine]]s for seeking out and destroying hostile surface ships and submarines and an [[Fast combat support ship|ammunition, oiler, and supply ship]] from [[Military Sealift Command]] to provide logistical support.<ref name="Stevens, p. 24"/> The numbers and types of vessels that make up each strike group can vary from group to group, depending on deployments, mission, and availability.<ref>Polmar 2004, p. 37</ref> |
||
===Design differences within the class=== |
===Design differences within the class=== |
||
While the designs of the last seven ships, beginning with ''Theodore Roosevelt'', differ slightly from those of the earlier ships, the U.S. Navy considers all ten carriers a single class.<ref name="Navy.mil CVN"/> When the older carriers come in for [[Refueling and Complex Overhaul]] (RCOH), their nuclear power plants are refueled, and they are upgraded to the standards of the later carriers. Other modifications may be performed to update the ships' equipment.<ref name="Navy.mil CVN"/><ref name='NorthropGrumman-Refueling and Complex Overhaul'>{{cite web|title=Refueling and Complex Overhaul|publisher=[[Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding]]|url=http://www.sb.northropgrumman.com/products/acfleetservices/|access-date=19 April 2008}}{{dead link|date=February 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> |
While the designs of the last seven ships, beginning with ''Theodore Roosevelt'', differ slightly from those of the earlier ships, the U.S. Navy considers all ten carriers a single class.<ref name="Navy.mil CVN"/> When the older carriers come in for [[Refueling and Complex Overhaul]] (RCOH), their nuclear power plants are refueled, and they are upgraded to the standards of the later carriers. Other modifications may be performed to update the ships' equipment.<ref name="Navy.mil CVN"/><ref name='NorthropGrumman-Refueling and Complex Overhaul'>{{cite web|title=Refueling and Complex Overhaul|publisher=[[Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding]]|url=http://www.sb.northropgrumman.com/products/acfleetservices/|access-date=19 April 2008}}{{dead link|date=February 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> |
||
The ships were initially classified only as attack carriers but have been constructed with anti-submarine capabilities since ''Carl Vinson''. These improvements include more advanced radar systems and facilities enabling the ships to operate aircraft in a more effective anti-submarine warfare role, including fitting common undersea picture (CUP) technology, which uses [[sonar]] to allow for better assessment of the threat from submarines.<ref name="ASW"/> |
The ships were initially classified only as attack carriers but have been constructed with anti-submarine capabilities since ''Carl Vinson''. These improvements include more advanced radar systems and facilities enabling the ships to operate aircraft in a more effective anti-submarine warfare role, including fitting common undersea picture (CUP) technology, which uses [[sonar]] to allow for better assessment of the threat from submarines.<ref name="ASW"/> |
||
''Theodore Roosevelt'' and later carriers have slight structural differences from the earlier ''Nimitz'' carriers, such as improved protection for ordnance stored in their [[Magazine (artillery)|magazines]]. Other improvements include upgraded flight deck ballistic protection, first installed on ''George Washington'', and the [[high-strength low-alloy steel]] (HSLA-100) used for constructing ships starting with ''John C. Stennis''.<ref name="Polmar 113"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/costing-the-cvn21-a-did-primer-01624/ |title=Costing the CVN-21: A DID Primer |date=19 December 2005 |publisher=Defense Industry Daily |access-date=27 December 2009}}</ref> More recently, older ships have had their flight decks upgraded with a new non-slip material fitted on new-build ships to improve safety for crew members and aircraft.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.surfacetechnologiescorp.com/projects/USS-Nimitz/ |title=USS Nimitz Flight Deck |publisher=Surface Technologies Corporation |access-date=2 January 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090731113036/http://surfacetechnologiescorp.com/projects/USS-Nimitz/ |archive-date=31 July 2009 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=51351 |title=Truman Flight Deck Receives New Non-Skid |author=Lt. Katharine Cerezo |date=20 February 2010 |publisher=U.S. Navy |access-date=13 March 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100722085105/http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=51351 |archive-date=22 July 2010 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
''Theodore Roosevelt'' and later carriers have slight structural differences from the earlier ''Nimitz'' carriers, such as improved protection for ordnance stored in their [[Magazine (artillery)|magazines]]. Other improvements include upgraded flight deck ballistic protection, first installed on ''George Washington'', and the [[high-strength low-alloy steel]] (HSLA-100) used for constructing ships starting with ''John C. Stennis''.<ref name="Polmar 113"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/costing-the-cvn21-a-did-primer-01624/ |title=Costing the CVN-21: A DID Primer |date=19 December 2005 |publisher=Defense Industry Daily |access-date=27 December 2009}}</ref> More recently, older ships have had their flight decks upgraded with a new non-slip material fitted on new-build ships to improve safety for crew members and aircraft.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.surfacetechnologiescorp.com/projects/USS-Nimitz/ |title=USS Nimitz Flight Deck |publisher=Surface Technologies Corporation |access-date=2 January 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090731113036/http://surfacetechnologiescorp.com/projects/USS-Nimitz/ |archive-date=31 July 2009 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=51351 |title=Truman Flight Deck Receives New Non-Skid |author=Lt. Katharine Cerezo |date=20 February 2010 |publisher=U.S. Navy |access-date=13 March 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100722085105/http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=51351 |archive-date=22 July 2010 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
Line 202: | Line 202: | ||
| 13 March 1982 |
| 13 March 1982 |
||
| 2005–2009 |
| 2005–2009 |
||
| [[Naval Air Station North Island]], San Diego, California<ref>{{Cite news |last= Jennewien |first= Chris |date = 10 January 2020 |title= USS Carl Vinson to Return to San Diego Following Year-and-a-Half Overhaul |work= Times of San Diego |url= https://timesofsandiego.com/military/2020/01/09/uss-carl-vinson-to-return-to-san-diego-following-year-and-a-half-overhaul/}}</ref> |
| [[Naval Air Station North Island]], [[San Diego, California]]<ref>{{Cite news |last= Jennewien |first= Chris |date = 10 January 2020 |title= USS Carl Vinson to Return to San Diego Following Year-and-a-Half Overhaul |work= Times of San Diego |url= https://timesofsandiego.com/military/2020/01/09/uss-carl-vinson-to-return-to-san-diego-following-year-and-a-half-overhaul/}}</ref> |
||
|<ref name="NVR Carl Vinson"/><ref name="DANFS Carl Vinson"/> |
|<ref name="NVR Carl Vinson"/><ref name="DANFS Carl Vinson"/> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
Line 230: | Line 230: | ||
| 4 July 1992 |
| 4 July 1992 |
||
| 2017–2023 |
| 2017–2023 |
||
| [[United States Fleet Activities Yokosuka|Yokosuka Naval Base]], [[Yokosuka, Japan]] |
|||
| [[Naval Station Norfolk]], [[Norfolk, Virginia]] |
|||
|<ref name="Polmar" /><ref name="NVR George Washington"/> |
|<ref name="Polmar" /><ref name="NVR George Washington"/> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
Line 239: | Line 239: | ||
| 9 December 1995 |
| 9 December 1995 |
||
| 2021– |
| 2021– |
||
| [[Naval Station Norfolk]], [[Norfolk, Virginia]]<br/>(In [[RCOH]] at [[Newport News Shipbuilding]], [[Newport News, Virginia]]) |
| [[Naval Station Norfolk]], [[Norfolk, Virginia]]<br />(In [[RCOH]] at [[Newport News Shipbuilding]], [[Newport News, Virginia]]) |
||
|<ref name="Polmar"/><ref name="NVR John C. Stennis"/> |
|<ref name="Polmar"/><ref name="NVR John C. Stennis"/> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
Line 258: | Line 258: | ||
| 12 July 2003 |
| 12 July 2003 |
||
| {{n/a}} |
| {{n/a}} |
||
| [[ |
| [[Naval Base Kitsap]], [[Bremerton, Washington]] |
||
|<ref name="Polmar"/><ref name="NVR Ronald Reagan"/> |
|<ref name="Polmar"/><ref name="NVR Ronald Reagan"/> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
Line 278: | Line 278: | ||
[[File:RH-53 Sea Stallion in hangar of USS Nimitz (CVN-68) 1980.jpg|thumb|alt=Three helicopters in the hangar of Nimitz|USN [[Sikorsky CH-53|RH-53D Sea Stallion]] helicopters aboard ''Nimitz'' in early 1980, prior to execution of [[Operation Eagle Claw]]]] |
[[File:RH-53 Sea Stallion in hangar of USS Nimitz (CVN-68) 1980.jpg|thumb|alt=Three helicopters in the hangar of Nimitz|USN [[Sikorsky CH-53|RH-53D Sea Stallion]] helicopters aboard ''Nimitz'' in early 1980, prior to execution of [[Operation Eagle Claw]]]] |
||
The two most significant deployments the ''Nimitz'' class was involved in during the 1990s were the [[Gulf War]] and its aftermath and [[Operation Southern Watch]] in southern Iraq. All active vessels were engaged in both of these to some extent, with Operation Southern Watch continuing until 2003.<ref>Lambeth, p. 6</ref> Most carriers in operation in [[Operation Desert Shield (Gulf War)|Operation Desert Shield]] and [[Operation Desert Storm]] played supporting roles, with only ''Theodore Roosevelt'' playing an active part in combat operations.{{ |
The two most significant deployments the ''Nimitz'' class was involved in during the 1990s were the [[Gulf War]] and its aftermath and [[Operation Southern Watch]] in southern Iraq. All active vessels were engaged in both of these to some extent, with Operation Southern Watch continuing until 2003.<ref>Lambeth 2005, p. 6</ref> Most carriers in operation in [[Operation Desert Shield (Gulf War)|Operation Desert Shield]] and [[Operation Desert Storm]] played supporting roles, with only ''Theodore Roosevelt'' playing an active part in combat operations.<ref name="Tucker">{{cite book |last= |first= |url=https://archive.org/details/the-encyclopedia-of-middle-east-wars-the-united-states-in-the-persian-gulf-afgha/ |title=The Encyclopedia of Middle East Wars: The United States in the Persian Gulf, Afghanistan, and Iraq Conflicts |publisher=ABC-CLIO |year=2010 |isbn=9781851099474 |editor-last=Tucker |editor-first=Spencer |location=Santa Barbara, California |pages=355, 361, 366–367}}</ref> |
||
Throughout the 1990s and more recently, ''Nimitz''-class carriers have been deployed as part of humanitarian missions. While deployed in the Gulf War, ''Abraham Lincoln'' was diverted to the Pacific Ocean to participate alongside 22 other ships in [[Operation Fiery Vigil]], evacuating civilians following the eruption of [[Mount Pinatubo]] on [[Luzon Island]] in the Philippines. In October 1993, ''Abraham Lincoln'' deployed to [[Somalia]] to assist UN humanitarian operations there, spending four weeks flying patrols around [[Mogadishu]] while supporting U.S. troops during [[Operation Restore Hope]]. The same ship also participated in [[Operation Vigilant Sentinel]] in the [[Persian Gulf]] in 1995.<ref name="DANFS Abraham Lincoln"/> |
Throughout the 1990s and more recently, ''Nimitz''-class carriers have been deployed as part of humanitarian missions. While deployed in the Gulf War, ''Abraham Lincoln'' was diverted to the Pacific Ocean to participate alongside 22 other ships in [[Operation Fiery Vigil]], evacuating civilians following the eruption of [[Mount Pinatubo]] on [[Luzon Island]] in the Philippines. In October 1993, ''Abraham Lincoln'' deployed to [[Somalia]] to assist UN humanitarian operations there, spending four weeks flying patrols around [[Mogadishu]] while supporting U.S. troops during [[Operation Restore Hope]]. The same ship also participated in [[Operation Vigilant Sentinel]] in the [[Persian Gulf]] in 1995.<ref name="DANFS Abraham Lincoln"/> |
||
Line 292: | Line 292: | ||
Following the attacks, ''John C. Stennis'' and ''George Washington'' participated in [[Operation Noble Eagle]], carrying out homeland security operations off the [[West Coast of the United States]]. All active ships have been involved in Iraq and Afghanistan since that time. This included the [[2003 invasion of Iraq|invasion]] in 2003, as well as providing subsequent support for [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]] since then.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.navy.mil/navydata/policy/vision/vis04/vpp04-appxa.pdf |title=Appendix A: Navy-Marine Corps: Crisis Response and Combat Actions |publisher=U.S. Navy |access-date=31 May 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090808061732/http://www.navy.mil/navydata/policy/vision/vis04/vpp04-appxa.pdf |archive-date=8 August 2009 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
Following the attacks, ''John C. Stennis'' and ''George Washington'' participated in [[Operation Noble Eagle]], carrying out homeland security operations off the [[West Coast of the United States]]. All active ships have been involved in Iraq and Afghanistan since that time. This included the [[2003 invasion of Iraq|invasion]] in 2003, as well as providing subsequent support for [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]] since then.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.navy.mil/navydata/policy/vision/vis04/vpp04-appxa.pdf |title=Appendix A: Navy-Marine Corps: Crisis Response and Combat Actions |publisher=U.S. Navy |access-date=31 May 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090808061732/http://www.navy.mil/navydata/policy/vision/vis04/vpp04-appxa.pdf |archive-date=8 August 2009 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
The carriers have also provided aid after natural disasters. In 2005, ''Abraham Lincoln'' supported [[Operation Unified Assistance]] in Indonesia after the [[2004 Indian Ocean earthquake|December 2004 tsunami]],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=1653 |title=DoD Briefing on Operation Unified Assistance, the Post-Tsunami Relief Effort |date=14 January 2005 |publisher=US Department of Defense |access-date=30 May 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100529165702/http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=1653 |archive-date=29 May 2010 |url-status=live }}</ref> and ''Harry S. Truman'' provided aid after [[Hurricane Katrina]] later in 2005.<ref>{{cite web |title=New Orleans Gets More Troops to Stop Katrina Looting |first=Heather |last=Burke |publisher=[[Bloomberg L.P.]] |date=1 September 2005 |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=axLmRQqK.K0U&refer=us |access-date=10 March 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060410104308/http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=axLmRQqK.K0U&refer=us |archive-date=10 April 2006 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
The carriers have also provided aid after natural disasters. In 2005, ''Abraham Lincoln'' supported [[Operation Unified Assistance]] in Indonesia after the [[2004 Indian Ocean earthquake|December 2004 tsunami]],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=1653 |title=DoD Briefing on Operation Unified Assistance, the Post-Tsunami Relief Effort |date=14 January 2005 |publisher=US Department of Defense |access-date=30 May 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100529165702/http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=1653 |archive-date=29 May 2010 |url-status=live }}</ref> and ''Harry S. Truman'' provided aid after [[Hurricane Katrina]] later in 2005.<ref>{{cite web |title=New Orleans Gets More Troops to Stop Katrina Looting |first=Heather |last=Burke |publisher=[[Bloomberg L.P.]] |date=1 September 2005 |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=axLmRQqK.K0U&refer=us |access-date=10 March 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060410104308/http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=axLmRQqK.K0U&refer=us |archive-date=10 April 2006 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
[[File:US Navy 050106-N-4336M-294 Crew members aboard USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) fill jugs with purified water from a Potable Water Manifold.jpg|thumb|upright|Crew of ''Abraham Lincoln'' filling water containers while deployed to assist humanitarian efforts in the aftermath of 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami]] |
[[File:US Navy 050106-N-4336M-294 Crew members aboard USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) fill jugs with purified water from a Potable Water Manifold.jpg|thumb|upright|Crew of ''Abraham Lincoln'' filling water containers while deployed to assist humanitarian efforts in the aftermath of 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami]] |
||
The ''Ronald Reagan'' Carrier Strike Group performed humanitarian assistance and disaster relief operations in the Philippines in June 2008 after [[Typhoon Fengshen (2008)|Typhoon Fengshen]], which killed hundreds from the central island regions and the main island of [[Luzon]].<ref>{{cite web |title=U.S. ship coming to help retrieve victims of sea tragedy |publisher=[[GMA News]] |date=25 June 2008 |url=http://www.gmanews.tv/story/103093/US-ship-coming-to-help-retrieve-victims-of-sea-tragedy |access-date=26 December 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150925002811/http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/103093/news/nation/us-ship-coming-to-help-retrieve-victims-of-sea-tragedy |archive-date=25 September 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref> In January 2010, ''Carl Vinson'' operated off [[Haiti]], providing aid and drinking water to [[2010 Haiti earthquake|earthquake]] survivors as part of the U.S.-led [[Operation Unified Response]], alongside other major warships and [[hospital ship]] {{USNS|Comfort|T-AH-20|2}}.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/01/13/haiti.us.coast.guard/index.html |title=First U.S. military aid reaches quake-stricken Haiti |author=Mike Mount and Larry Shaughnessy |date=13 January 2010 |publisher=CNN |access-date=9 February 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100218142750/http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/01/13/haiti.us.coast.guard/index.html |archive-date=18 February 2010 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
The ''Ronald Reagan'' Carrier Strike Group performed humanitarian assistance and disaster relief operations in the Philippines in June 2008 after [[Typhoon Fengshen (2008)|Typhoon Fengshen]], which killed hundreds from the central island regions and the main island of [[Luzon]].<ref>{{cite web |title=U.S. ship coming to help retrieve victims of sea tragedy |publisher=[[GMA News]] |date=25 June 2008 |url=http://www.gmanews.tv/story/103093/US-ship-coming-to-help-retrieve-victims-of-sea-tragedy |access-date=26 December 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150925002811/http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/103093/news/nation/us-ship-coming-to-help-retrieve-victims-of-sea-tragedy |archive-date=25 September 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref> In January 2010, ''Carl Vinson'' operated off [[Haiti]], providing aid and drinking water to [[2010 Haiti earthquake|earthquake]] survivors as part of the U.S.-led [[Operation Unified Response]], alongside other major warships and [[hospital ship]] {{USNS|Comfort|T-AH-20|2}}.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/01/13/haiti.us.coast.guard/index.html |title=First U.S. military aid reaches quake-stricken Haiti |author=Mike Mount and Larry Shaughnessy |date=13 January 2010 |publisher=CNN |access-date=9 February 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100218142750/http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/01/13/haiti.us.coast.guard/index.html |archive-date=18 February 2010 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
Line 316: | Line 316: | ||
[[File:USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) and USS Harry S. Truman (CVN-75) underway in the Atlantic Ocean on 4 June 2020 (200604-N-BD352-0199).JPG|thumb|Aerial view of {{USS|Harry S. Truman}} (CVN-75) alongside {{USS|Gerald R. Ford}} (CVN-78), a ship of the next [[Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carrier|Gerald R. Ford class]]]] |
[[File:USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) and USS Harry S. Truman (CVN-75) underway in the Atlantic Ocean on 4 June 2020 (200604-N-BD352-0199).JPG|thumb|Aerial view of {{USS|Harry S. Truman}} (CVN-75) alongside {{USS|Gerald R. Ford}} (CVN-78), a ship of the next [[Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carrier|Gerald R. Ford class]]]] |
||
''Nimitz''-class carriers were initially designed to have a 50-year service life.<ref name="Navy.mil CVN"/> At the end of their service life, ships will be [[Ship decommissioning|decommissioned]]. This process will first take place on ''Nimitz'' and is estimated to cost from $750 to $900 million. This compares with an estimated $53 million for a conventionally powered carrier. Most of the difference in cost is attributed to the [[Ship-Submarine Recycling Program|deactivation]] of the nuclear power plants and the safe removal of radioactive material and other contaminated equipment.<ref>Stevens, p. 10</ref> |
''Nimitz''-class carriers were initially designed to have a 50-year service life.<ref name="Navy.mil CVN"/> At the end of their service life, ships will be [[Ship decommissioning|decommissioned]]. This process will first take place on ''Nimitz'' and is estimated to cost from $750 to $900 million. This compares with an estimated $53 million for a conventionally powered carrier. Most of the difference in cost is attributed to the [[Ship-Submarine Recycling Program|deactivation]] of the nuclear power plants and the safe removal of radioactive material and other contaminated equipment.<ref>Stevens 1998, p. 10</ref> |
||
A new class of carriers, the ''Gerald R. Ford'' class, is being constructed to replace previous vessels after decommissioning. Ten of these are expected, and the first has entered service as of 22 July 2017 to replace {{USS|Enterprise|CVN-65|2}}. Most of the rest of these new carriers are to replace the oldest ''Nimitz'' ships as they reach the end of their service lives.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_6712/is_24_239/ai_n29459545/ |title=CVN-77 Delivery Moved To December, Newport News on Track For January Commissioning |year=2006 |publisher=Defense Daily |access-date=23 December 2009 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120708172237/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_6712/is_24_239/ai_n29459545/ |archive-date=8 July 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref> The new carriers will have a similar design to ''George H.W. Bush'' (using an almost identical hull shape) and technological and structural improvements.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sb.northropgrumman.com/products/geraldrfordclass/facts/index.html |title=CVN-78 Facts |publisher=Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding |access-date=30 May 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100107055408/http://www.sb.northropgrumman.com/products/geraldrfordclass/facts/index.html |archive-date=7 January 2010 |df=dmy-all }}</ref> |
A new class of carriers, the ''Gerald R. Ford'' class, is being constructed to replace previous vessels after decommissioning. Ten of these are expected, and the first has entered service as of 22 July 2017 to replace {{USS|Enterprise|CVN-65|2}}. Most of the rest of these new carriers are to replace the oldest ''Nimitz'' ships as they reach the end of their service lives.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_6712/is_24_239/ai_n29459545/ |title=CVN-77 Delivery Moved To December, Newport News on Track For January Commissioning |year=2006 |publisher=Defense Daily |access-date=23 December 2009 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120708172237/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_6712/is_24_239/ai_n29459545/ |archive-date=8 July 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref> The new carriers will have a similar design to ''George H.W. Bush'' (using an almost identical hull shape) and technological and structural improvements.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sb.northropgrumman.com/products/geraldrfordclass/facts/index.html |title=CVN-78 Facts |publisher=Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding |access-date=30 May 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100107055408/http://www.sb.northropgrumman.com/products/geraldrfordclass/facts/index.html |archive-date=7 January 2010 |df=dmy-all }}</ref> |
||
Line 365: | Line 365: | ||
==References== |
==References== |
||
* {{Cite book |title=U.S. Aircraft Carriers: An Illustrated Design History |last=Friedman |first=Norman |year=1983 |publisher=[[Naval Institute Press]] |location=[[Annapolis, Maryland]] |isbn=978-0-87021-739-5}} |
* {{Cite book |title=U.S. Aircraft Carriers: An Illustrated Design History |last=Friedman |first=Norman |year=1983 |publisher=[[Naval Institute Press]] |location=[[Annapolis, Maryland]] |isbn=978-0-87021-739-5}} |
||
* {{Cite book |last= |first= |title=Combat Fleets of the World 1980/81: Their Ships, Aircraft, and Armament |publisher=Naval Institute Press |year=1980 |isbn=978-0870211232 |location=Annapolis, Maryland|editor-last=Labayle Couhat|editor-first=Jean|url=https://archive.org/details/combatfleetsofwo0000unse_f4x2/|url-access=registration}} |
|||
* {{Cite book |title=American Carrier Air Power at the Dawn of a New Century |last=Lambeth |first=Benjamin |year=2005 |publisher=[[RAND Corporation]] |location=[[Santa Monica, California]] |isbn=978-0-8330-3842-5}} |
* {{Cite book |title=American Carrier Air Power at the Dawn of a New Century |last=Lambeth |first=Benjamin |year=2005 |publisher=[[RAND Corporation]] |location=[[Santa Monica, California]] |isbn=978-0-8330-3842-5}} |
||
* {{Cite book |title=The Naval Institute Guide to the Ships and Aircraft of the U.S. Fleet |last=Polmar |first=Norman |year=2004 |publisher=Naval Institute Press |location=Annapolis, Maryland |isbn=978-1-59114-685-8 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/navalinstitutegu0018polm }} |
* {{Cite book |title=The Naval Institute Guide to the Ships and Aircraft of the U.S. Fleet |last=Polmar |first=Norman |year=2004 |publisher=Naval Institute Press |location=Annapolis, Maryland |isbn=978-1-59114-685-8 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/navalinstitutegu0018polm }} |
||
* {{Cite book |title=Navy Aircraft Carriers: Cost-effectiveness of Conventionally and Nuclear-powered Carriers: Report to Congressional Requesters |last=Stevens |first=Ted |year=1998 |publisher=[[Government Accountability Office]] |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=1-4289-7664-7}} |
* {{Cite book |title=Navy Aircraft Carriers: Cost-effectiveness of Conventionally and Nuclear-powered Carriers: Report to Congressional Requesters |last=Stevens |first=Ted |year=1998 |publisher=[[Government Accountability Office]] |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=1-4289-7664-7}} |
||
* {{cite book |last=Wertheim |first=Eric |url=https://archive.org/details/navalinstitutegu0000unse_j3x1/ |title=The Naval Institute Guide to Combat Fleets of the World, 2005–2006: Their Ships, Aircraft, and Systems |location=Annapolis, Maryland |url-access=registration |publisher=Naval Institute Press |year=2005 |isbn=978-1591149347}} |
|||
* {{Cite book |title=The Naval Institute Guide to Combat Fleets of the World: Their Ships, Aircraft and Systems |last=Wertheim |first=Eric |year=2007 |publisher=Naval Institute Press |location=Annapolis, Maryland |isbn=978-1-59114-955-2}} |
* {{Cite book |title=The Naval Institute Guide to Combat Fleets of the World: Their Ships, Aircraft and Systems |last=Wertheim |first=Eric |year=2007 |publisher=Naval Institute Press |location=Annapolis, Maryland |isbn=978-1-59114-955-2}} |
||
==Further reading== |
==Further reading== |
||
* {{cite book |first= John F. |last= Schank |author2=Mark V. Arena |author3=Denis Rushworth |author4=John Birkler |author5=James Chiesa |title= Refueling and Complex Overhaul of the USS ''Nimitz'' (CVN 68): Lessons for the Future |url= http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1632/index.html |publisher= [[Rand Corporation]] |location= |
* {{cite book |first= John F. |last= Schank |author2=Mark V. Arena |author3=Denis Rushworth |author4=John Birkler |author5=James Chiesa |title= Refueling and Complex Overhaul of the USS ''Nimitz'' (CVN 68): Lessons for the Future |url= http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1632/index.html |publisher= [[Rand Corporation]] |location= Santa Monica, California |isbn= 0-8330-3288-7 |year= 2002 |access-date= 4 December 2010}} |
||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
{{Commons category|Nimitz class aircraft carriers}} |
{{Commons category|Nimitz class aircraft carriers}} |
||
* [http://military.discovery.com/videos/top-ten-fighting-ships-nimitz-aircraft-carrier.html Discovery channel video] |
* [http://military.discovery.com/videos/top-ten-fighting-ships-nimitz-aircraft-carrier.html Discovery channel video] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120507062101/http://military.discovery.com/videos/top-ten-fighting-ships-nimitz-aircraft-carrier.html |date=7 May 2012 }} |
||
* [http://www.navweaps.com/index_tech/tech-028.htm Busting the speed myth of USS Enterprise and Nimitz-class nuclear-powered supercarrier], a special report by NavWeaps.Com |
* [http://www.navweaps.com/index_tech/tech-028.htm Busting the speed myth of USS Enterprise and Nimitz-class nuclear-powered supercarrier], a special report by NavWeaps.Com |
||
* [http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/cvn-68-mods.htm CVN-68 ''Nimitz''-class Modernization] – GlobalSecurity.org |
|||
{{Nimitz class aircraft carrier}} |
{{Nimitz class aircraft carrier}} |
||
{{Active ship classes of the United States Navy}} |
|||
{{Aircraft carrier classes in service}} |
{{Aircraft carrier classes in service}} |
||
{{Authority control}} |
{{Authority control}} |
||
Line 386: | Line 388: | ||
[[Category:Nimitz-class aircraft carriers| ]] |
[[Category:Nimitz-class aircraft carriers| ]] |
||
[[Category:Naval ships of the United States]] |
[[Category:Naval ships of the United States]] |
||
[[Category:Aircraft carriers of the United States| |
[[Category:Aircraft carriers of the United States|Nimitz-class aircraft carriers]] |
||
[[Category:Aircraft carrier classes]] |
[[Category:Aircraft carrier classes]] |
||
[[Category:Cold War aircraft carriers of the United States| |
[[Category:Cold War aircraft carriers of the United States|Nimitz-class aircraft carriers]] |
Latest revision as of 03:24, 6 October 2024
USS Nimitz (CVN-68), lead ship of the class of supercarriers, at sea near Victoria, British Columbia, after the 1999–2001 refit
| |
Class overview | |
---|---|
Name | Nimitz-class aircraft carrier |
Builders | Newport News Shipbuilding Company |
Operators | United States Navy |
Preceded by | |
Succeeded by | Gerald R. Ford class |
Subclasses | |
Cost | US$1.98 billion in 1975[1] ($11.2 billion in 2023)[2] |
Built | 1968–2006 |
In service | 1975–present |
In commission | 3 May 1975 |
Planned | 10 |
Completed | 10 |
Active | 10 |
General characteristics | |
Type | Aircraft carrier |
Displacement | 100,000 to 104,600 long tons (101,600–106,300 t) full load[3] |
Length |
|
Beam |
|
Draft |
|
Propulsion |
|
Speed | 30+ knots (56+ km/h; 35+ mph)[6] |
Range | Unlimited distance; 20–25 years |
Complement |
|
Crew | 5,000–5,200[1] (including airwing) |
Sensors and processing systems |
|
Electronic warfare & decoys |
|
Armament |
|
Armor | 2.5 in (64 mm) Kevlar over vital spaces[7] |
Aircraft carried | 85–90 fixed wing and helicopters[6] |
The Nimitz class is a class of ten nuclear-powered aircraft carriers in service with the United States Navy. The lead ship of the class is named after World War II United States Pacific Fleet commander Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, who was the last living U.S. Navy officer to hold the rank. With an overall length of 1,092 ft (333 m) and a full-load displacement of over 100,000 long tons (100,000 t),[3] the Nimitz-class ships were the largest warships built and in service until USS Gerald R. Ford entered the fleet in 2017.[8]
Instead of the gas turbines or diesel–electric systems used for propulsion on many modern warships, the carriers use two A4W pressurized water reactors. The reactors produce steam to drive steam turbines which drive four propeller shafts and can produce a maximum speed of over 30 knots (56 km/h; 35 mph) and a maximum power of around 260,000 shaft horsepower (190 MW). As a result of nuclear power, the ships are capable of operating for over 20 years without refueling and are predicted to have a service life of over 50 years. They are categorized as nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and are numbered with consecutive hull numbers from CVN-68 to CVN-77.[Note 1]
All ten carriers were constructed by Newport News Shipbuilding Company in Virginia. USS Nimitz, the lead ship of the class, was commissioned on 3 May 1975, and USS George H.W. Bush, the tenth and last of the class, was commissioned on 10 January 2009. Since the 1970s, Nimitz-class carriers have participated in many conflicts and operations across the world, including Operation Eagle Claw in Iran, the Gulf War, and more recently in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The angled flight decks of the carriers use a CATOBAR arrangement to operate aircraft, with steam catapults and arrestor wires for launch and recovery. As well as speeding up flight deck operations, this allows for a much wider variety of aircraft than with the STOVL arrangement used on smaller carriers. An embarked carrier air wing comprising around 64 aircraft is normally deployed on board. The air wings' strike fighters are primarily F/A-18E and F/A-18F Super Hornets. In addition to their aircraft, the vessels carry short-range defensive weaponry for anti-aircraft warfare and missile defense.
The unit cost was about US$8.5 billion in FY 2012 dollars,[1] equal to US$11.2 billion in 2023.[2]
Description
[edit]The Nimitz-class aircraft carriers have a length of 1,092 ft (333 m) overall and 1,040 ft (317 m) at the waterline, with a beam of 252 ft (77 m) overall and 134 ft (41 m) at the waterline; the individual ships have slight variations in their dimensions.[1][9] They were initially designed with a full-load displacement of 87,000 long tons (88,000 t; 97,000 short tons) and a draft of 37 ft (11 m), but the ships would be delivered several thousand tons heavier, particularly for later members of the class.[1] As the vessels were overhauled and installed more equipment, loaded displacement would climb to exceed 100,000 long tons (100,000 t; 110,000 short tons). For example, USS Abraham Lincoln currently displaces 104,112 long tons (105,783 t; 116,605 short tons) at full load.[10] The ships' nominal complement comprises: 3,000–3,200; 1,500 (air wing); and 500 (other).[1]
Design
[edit]The Nimitz-class aircraft carriers were ordered to supplement the aircraft carriers of the Kitty Hawk and Enterprise classes, maintaining the strength and capability of the U.S. Navy after the older carriers were decommissioned.[11] The ships were designed to be improvements on previous U.S. aircraft carriers, particularly the Enterprise and Forrestal-class supercarriers, although the arrangement of the vessels is relatively similar to that of the Kitty Hawk class.[12] Among other design improvements, the two reactors on Nimitz-class carriers take up less space than the eight reactors used on Enterprise. Along with a more generally improved design, Nimitz-class carriers can carry 90% more aviation fuel and 50% more ordnance when compared to the Forrestal class.[13]
The U.S. Navy has stated that the carriers could withstand three times the damage sustained by the Essex class inflicted by Japanese air attacks during World War II.[6] The hangars on the ships are divided into three fire bays by thick steel doors that are designed to restrict the spread of fire. This addition has been present on U.S. aircraft carriers since World War II, after the fires caused by kamikaze attacks.[14]
The first ships were designed around the time of the Vietnam War, and certain aspects of the design were influenced by operations there. To a certain extent, the carrier operations in Vietnam demonstrated the need for increased capabilities of aircraft carriers over their survivability; they were used to send sorties into the war and were, therefore, less subject to attack. As a result of this experience, Nimitz-class carriers were designed with larger stores of aviation fuel and larger magazines compared to previous carriers, although this was partly a result of increased space available by the new design of the ships' propulsion systems.[15]
A major purpose of the carriers was initially to support the U.S. military during the Cold War. They were designed with capabilities for that role, including using nuclear power instead of oil for greater endurance and the ability to adjust their weapons systems on the basis of new intelligence and technological developments.[16] They were initially categorized only as attack carriers, but ships have been constructed with anti-submarine capabilities since USS Carl Vinson.[17][18] As a result, the ships and their aircraft can participate in a wide range of operations, including sea and air blockades; mine laying; and missile strikes on land, air, and sea.[19]
Because of a design flaw, ships of this class have inherent lists to starboard when under combat loads that exceed the capability of their list control systems. The problem appears to be especially prevalent on some of the more modern vessels. This problem has been previously rectified by using damage control voids for ballast, but a solution using solid ballast that does not affect the ship's survivability has been proposed.[20][1]
-
An artist's impression of USS Nimitz in 1968
-
George Washington Carrier Strike Group formation sails in the Atlantic Ocean
Construction
[edit]All ten Nimitz-class carriers were constructed between 1968 and 2006 at Newport News Shipbuilding in Newport News, Virginia. The first three units of the class were erected in Dry Dock 11, the other seven ships were constructed in the largest dry dock in the western hemisphere, Dry Dock 12, now 2,172 feet (662 m) long after a recent expansion.[citation needed]
Beginning with USS Theodore Roosevelt, the aircraft carriers were manufactured with modular construction. This means that whole sections could be welded together with plumbing and electrical equipment already fitted, improving efficiency. The modules were lifted into the dry dock using gantry cranes and welded. In the case of the bow sections, these can weigh over 1,500,000 pounds (680 t).[21][22] This method was originally developed by Ingalls Shipbuilding and increases the rate of work because much of the fitting out does not have to be carried out within the confines of the already-finished hull.[23]
The total cost of construction for each ship was around $4.5 billion.[Note 2][11]
Propulsion
[edit]All ships of the class are powered by two A4W nuclear reactors, housed in separate compartments. The reactors produce heat through nuclear fission, which heats water to produce steam. This is then passed through four turbines, which are shared by the two reactors. A gearbox transmits power to four propeller shafts, producing a maximum speed of over 30 knots (56 km/h) and maximum power of 260,000 brake horsepower (194 MW).[6] The turbines power the four bronze propellers, each with a diameter of 25 feet (7.6 m) and a weight of 66,000 pounds (30 t). Behind these are the two rudders, which are 29 feet (8.8 m) high and 22 feet (6.7 m) long, and each weighs 110,000 pounds (50 metric tons).[24]
The Nimitz-class ships constructed since USS Ronald Reagan also have bulbous bows to improve speed and fuel efficiency by reducing wave-making resistance.[25] As a result of nuclear power, the ships are capable of operating continuously for over 20 years without refueling and are predicted to have a service life of over 50 years.[24]
Armament and protection
[edit]In addition to the aircraft carried on board, the ships carry defensive equipment for use against missiles and hostile aircraft. These consist of either two or three RIM-7 Sea Sparrow or RIM-162 Evolved SeaSparrow Missile Mk 29 missile launchers designed for defense against aircraft and anti-ship missiles, as well as either three or four 20 mm Phalanx CIWS.[26]
USS Ronald Reagan has none of these, having been built with the Mk 49 Guided Missile Launching Systems for RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missiles, two of which have also been installed on USS Nimitz and USS George Washington. These will be installed on the other ships as they return for Refueling Complex Overhaul (RCOH).[6][1] Since USS Theodore Roosevelt, the carriers have been constructed with 2.5 in (64 mm) Kevlar armor over vital spaces, and earlier ships have been retrofitted with it: Nimitz in 1983–1984, Dwight D. Eisenhower from 1985 to 1987 and Carl Vinson in 1989.[7][27]
The ships' other countermeasures are four Sippican SRBOC (super rapid bloom off-board chaff) six-barrel Mk 36 decoy launchers, which deploy infrared flares and chaff to disrupt the sensors of incoming missiles; an SSTDS torpedo defense system; and an AN/SLQ-25 Nixie torpedo countermeasures system. The carriers also use AN/SLQ-32(V) jamming systems to detect and disrupt hostile radar signals in addition to the electronic warfare capabilities of some of the aircraft on board.[28][29]
The presence of nuclear weapons on board U.S. aircraft carriers since the end of the Cold War has neither been confirmed nor denied by the U.S. government. As a result, the presence of a U.S. aircraft carrier in a foreign port has occasionally provoked protest from local people, for example, when Nimitz visited Chennai, India, in 2007. At that time, the Strike Group commander Rear Admiral John Terence Blake stated, "The U.S. policy [...] is that we do not routinely deploy nuclear weapons on board Nimitz."[30][31]
In May 2013, George H.W. Bush conducted the first carrier-borne end-to-end at-sea test of the Surface Ship Torpedo Defense System (SSTDS). The SSTDS combined the passive detection of the Torpedo Warning System (TWS) that finds, classifies, and tracks torpedoes with the hard-kill capability of a Countermeasure Anti-Torpedo (CAT), an encapsulated miniature torpedo designed to locate, home in on, and destroy hostile torpedoes.[32] This was to increase protection against wake-homing torpedoes like the Type 53 that do not respond to acoustic decoys. The pieces of the SSTDS were engineered to locate and destroy incoming torpedoes in a matter of seconds; each system included one TWS and 8 CATs. Initial operational capability (IOC) was planned for 2019, and all aircraft carriers were to be outfitted by 2035.[33][34][35] The Navy suspended work on the project in September 2018 due to poor reliability of the components; hardware, already installed on five carriers, is to be removed by 2023.[36][37]
Carrier air wing
[edit]In order for a carrier to deploy, it must embark one of ten Carrier Air Wings (CVW).[Note 3] The carriers can accommodate a maximum of 130 F/A-18 Hornets[38] or 85–90 aircraft of different types, but current numbers are typically 64 aircraft. Although the air wings are integrated with the operation of the carriers they are deployed to, they are regarded as separate entities. As well as the aircrew, the air wings are also made up of support personnel involved in roles including maintenance, aircraft and ordnance handling, and emergency procedures. Each person on the flight deck wears color-coded clothing to make their role easily identifiable.[39]
A typical carrier air wing can include 24–36 F/A-18E or F Super Hornets as strike fighters; two squadrons of 10–12 F/A-18C Hornets, with one of these often provided by the U.S. Marine Corps (VMFA), also as strike fighters; 4–6 EA-18G Growlers for electronic warfare; 4–6 E-2C or D Hawkeyes for airborne early warning (AEW), C-2 Greyhounds used for logistics (to be replaced by MV-22 Ospreys); and a Helicopter Anti-Submarine Squadron of 6–8 SH-60F and HH-60H Seahawks. Aircraft previously operated from Nimitz-class carriers include F-4 Phantoms, RA-5C Vigilantes, RF-8G Crusaders, F-14 Tomcats, S-3 Vikings, EA-3B Skywarriors, EA-6B Prowlers, A-7 Corsair II, and A-6E Intruder aircraft.[40][needs update]
Flight deck and aircraft facilities
[edit]The flight deck is angled at nine degrees, which allows for aircraft to be launched and recovered simultaneously. This angle of the flight deck was reduced slightly compared to previous carriers, as the current design improves the airflow around the carrier.[15] Four steam catapults are used to launch fixed-wing aircraft, and four arrestor wires are used for recovery. The two newest carriers, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, have only three arrestor wires each, as the fourth was used infrequently on earlier ships and was therefore deemed unnecessary.[41]
This CATOBAR arrangement allows for faster launching and recovery as well as a much wider range of aircraft that can be used on board compared with smaller aircraft carriers, most of which use a simpler STOVL arrangement without catapults or arrestor wires. The ship's aircraft operations are controlled by the air boss from Primary Flight Control or Pri-Fly. Four large elevators transport aircraft between the flight deck and the hangars below. These hangars are divided into three bays by thick steel doors that are designed to restrict the spread of fire.[14]
Strike groups
[edit]When an aircraft carrier deploys, it takes a Carrier Strike Group (CSG), made up of several other warships and supply vessels that allow the operation to be carried out. The armament of the Nimitz class is made up only of short-range defensive weapons, used as a last line of defense against enemy missiles and aircraft. As with all surface ships, an aircraft carrier is particularly vulnerable to attack from below, specifically from submarines. An aircraft carrier is a very expensive, hard to replace, and strategically valuable asset, and therefore it logically has immense value as a target.[42]
As a result of its target value and vulnerability, aircraft carriers are always escorted by at least one submarine for protection. The other vessels in the Strike Group provide additional capabilities, such as long-range Tomahawk missiles or the Aegis Combat System, and protect the carrier from attack. A typical Strike Group may include, in addition to an aircraft carrier: up to six surface combatants, including guided-missile cruisers and guided-missile destroyers, used primarily for anti-aircraft warfare and anti-submarine warfare, and frigates/guided-missile frigates, prior to their retirement from USN service. When the Navy commissions a new class of frigates (FFG(X)), they will again accompany CSGs. Also making up part of the group is one or two attack submarines for seeking out and destroying hostile surface ships and submarines and an ammunition, oiler, and supply ship from Military Sealift Command to provide logistical support.[42] The numbers and types of vessels that make up each strike group can vary from group to group, depending on deployments, mission, and availability.[43]
Design differences within the class
[edit]While the designs of the last seven ships, beginning with Theodore Roosevelt, differ slightly from those of the earlier ships, the U.S. Navy considers all ten carriers a single class.[1] When the older carriers come in for Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH), their nuclear power plants are refueled, and they are upgraded to the standards of the later carriers. Other modifications may be performed to update the ships' equipment.[1][44]
The ships were initially classified only as attack carriers but have been constructed with anti-submarine capabilities since Carl Vinson. These improvements include more advanced radar systems and facilities enabling the ships to operate aircraft in a more effective anti-submarine warfare role, including fitting common undersea picture (CUP) technology, which uses sonar to allow for better assessment of the threat from submarines.[17]
Theodore Roosevelt and later carriers have slight structural differences from the earlier Nimitz carriers, such as improved protection for ordnance stored in their magazines. Other improvements include upgraded flight deck ballistic protection, first installed on George Washington, and the high-strength low-alloy steel (HSLA-100) used for constructing ships starting with John C. Stennis.[12][45] More recently, older ships have had their flight decks upgraded with a new non-slip material fitted on new-build ships to improve safety for crew members and aircraft.[46][47]
The last carrier of the class, George H.W. Bush, was designed as a "transition ship" from the Nimitz class to the replacement Gerald R. Ford class. George H.W. Bush incorporates new technologies, including improved propeller and bulbous bow designs, a reduced radar cross-section, and electronic and environmental upgrades.[48][49] The ship's cost was $6.2 billion. The earlier Nimitz-class ships each cost around $4.5 billion.[50] To lower costs, some new technologies and design features were also incorporated into USS Ronald Reagan, the previous carrier, including a redesigned island.[51]
Ships in class
[edit]The United States Navy lists the following ten ships in the Nimitz class:[1]
Ship | Hull No. | Subclass | Laid down | Launched | Commissioned | Refueling and Overhaul | Homeport | Refs. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nimitz | CVN-68 | Nimitz subclass | 22 June 1968 | 13 May 1972 | 3 May 1975 | 1998–2001 | Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington | [9][52] |
Dwight D. Eisenhower (ex-Eisenhower) | CVN-69 | 15 August 1970 | 11 October 1975 | 18 October 1977 | 2001–2005 | Naval Station Norfolk, Norfolk, Virginia | [53][54] | |
Carl Vinson | CVN-70 | 11 October 1975 | 15 March 1980 | 13 March 1982 | 2005–2009 | Naval Air Station North Island, San Diego, California[55] | [56][57] | |
Theodore Roosevelt | CVN-71 | Theodore Roosevelt subclass | 31 October 1981 | 27 October 1984 | 25 October 1986 | 2009–2013 | Naval Air Station North Island, San Diego, California | [3][58] |
Abraham Lincoln | CVN-72 | 3 November 1984 | 13 February 1988 | 11 November 1989 | 2013–2017 | Naval Air Station North Island, San Diego, California | [59][60] | |
George Washington | CVN-73 | 25 August 1986 | 21 July 1990 | 4 July 1992 | 2017–2023 | Yokosuka Naval Base, Yokosuka, Japan | [3][61] | |
John C. Stennis | CVN-74 | 13 March 1991 | 11 November 1993 | 9 December 1995 | 2021– | Naval Station Norfolk, Norfolk, Virginia (In RCOH at Newport News Shipbuilding, Newport News, Virginia) |
[3][62] | |
Harry S. Truman (ex-United States) | CVN-75 | 29 November 1993 | 7 September 1996 | 25 July 1998 | — | Naval Station Norfolk, Norfolk, Virginia | [3][63] | |
Ronald Reagan | CVN-76 | Ronald Reagan subclass | 12 February 1998 | 4 March 2001 | 12 July 2003 | — | Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington | [3][64] |
George H.W. Bush | CVN-77 | 6 September 2003 | 9 October 2006 | 10 January 2009 | — | Naval Station Norfolk, Norfolk, Virginia | [65] |
Service history
[edit]1975–1989
[edit]One of the first major operations in which the ships were involved was Operation Eagle Claw launched by Nimitz in 1980 after she had deployed to the Indian Ocean in response to the taking of hostages in the U.S. embassy in Tehran.[19] Although initially part of the U.S. Atlantic Fleet,[53] Dwight D. Eisenhower relieved Nimitz in this operation after her service in the Mediterranean Sea.[52] Nimitz conducted a Freedom of Navigation exercise alongside the aircraft carrier USS Forrestal in August 1981 in the Gulf of Sidra, near Libya. During this exercise, two of the ship's F-14 Tomcats shot down two Libyan aircraft in what became known as the Gulf of Sidra incident.[66] In 1987, Carl Vinson participated in the first U.S. carrier deployment in the Bering Sea,[67] and Nimitz provided security during the 1988 Olympic Games in Seoul.[68]
1990–2000
[edit]The two most significant deployments the Nimitz class was involved in during the 1990s were the Gulf War and its aftermath and Operation Southern Watch in southern Iraq. All active vessels were engaged in both of these to some extent, with Operation Southern Watch continuing until 2003.[69] Most carriers in operation in Operation Desert Shield and Operation Desert Storm played supporting roles, with only Theodore Roosevelt playing an active part in combat operations.[70]
Throughout the 1990s and more recently, Nimitz-class carriers have been deployed as part of humanitarian missions. While deployed in the Gulf War, Abraham Lincoln was diverted to the Pacific Ocean to participate alongside 22 other ships in Operation Fiery Vigil, evacuating civilians following the eruption of Mount Pinatubo on Luzon Island in the Philippines. In October 1993, Abraham Lincoln deployed to Somalia to assist UN humanitarian operations there, spending four weeks flying patrols around Mogadishu while supporting U.S. troops during Operation Restore Hope. The same ship also participated in Operation Vigilant Sentinel in the Persian Gulf in 1995.[60]
Theodore Roosevelt flew patrols in support of the Kurds over northern Iraq as part of Operation Provide Comfort in 1991. In 1996, George Washington played a peacekeeping role in Operation Decisive Endeavor in Bosnia and Herzegovina.[71] In 1999, Theodore Roosevelt was called to the Ionian Sea to support Operation Allied Force alongside other NATO militaries.[72]
2001–present
[edit]Harry S. Truman's maiden deployment was in November 2000. The carrier's air wing flew 869 combat sorties in support of Operation Southern Watch, including a strike on Iraqi air defense sites on 16 February 2001, in response to Iraqi surface-to-air missile fire against United Nations coalition forces.[73]
After the September 11 attacks, Carl Vinson and Theodore Roosevelt were among the first warships to participate in Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan. Carl Vinson sailed towards the Persian Gulf intending to support Operation Southern Watch in July 2001. This changed in response to the attacks, and the ship changed course to travel towards the North Arabian Sea, where she launched the first airstrikes in support of the operation on 7 October 2001.[74]
Following the attacks, John C. Stennis and George Washington participated in Operation Noble Eagle, carrying out homeland security operations off the West Coast of the United States. All active ships have been involved in Iraq and Afghanistan since that time. This included the invasion in 2003, as well as providing subsequent support for Operation Iraqi Freedom since then.[75]
The carriers have also provided aid after natural disasters. In 2005, Abraham Lincoln supported Operation Unified Assistance in Indonesia after the December 2004 tsunami,[76] and Harry S. Truman provided aid after Hurricane Katrina later in 2005.[77]
The Ronald Reagan Carrier Strike Group performed humanitarian assistance and disaster relief operations in the Philippines in June 2008 after Typhoon Fengshen, which killed hundreds from the central island regions and the main island of Luzon.[78] In January 2010, Carl Vinson operated off Haiti, providing aid and drinking water to earthquake survivors as part of the U.S.-led Operation Unified Response, alongside other major warships and hospital ship Comfort.[79]
Refueling Complex Overhaul
[edit]In order to refuel their nuclear power plants, the carriers each undergo a Refueling and Overhaul (RCOH) once in their service lives. This is also the most substantial overhaul the ships undergo while in service and involves bringing the vessels' equipment up to the standards of the newest ships. The ship is placed in a dry dock, and essential maintenance is carried out, including painting the hull below the waterline and replacing electrical and mechanical components such as valves. Because of the large time periods between the ships' constructions, the armament and designs of the newer ships are more modern than those of the older ships. In RCOH, the older ships are refitted to the standards of the newer ships, which can include upgrades to the flight deck, aircraft catapults, combat systems, and radar systems; precise details can vary significantly between the ships. The improvements normally take around four years to complete. The RCOH for USS Theodore Roosevelt took four years to complete (2009–2013) and cost about $2.6 billion.[80][81][82][83] Planned Incremental Availability is a similar procedure, although it is less substantial and does not involve refueling the nuclear power plants.[84]
Symbolic and diplomatic roles
[edit]Because of their status as the largest warships in the U.S. Navy, the deployment of an aircraft carrier can fulfill a symbolic role, not just as a deterrent to an enemy but often as a diplomatic tool in strengthening relations with allies and potential allies. The latter of these functions can occur either as a single visit to a country, in which senior naval officers are allowed to observe the operation of the carrier and interact with its senior officers,[85] or as part of an international task force. This can be in combat operations, such as the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999,[86] or training deployments, such as Exercise RIMPAC. In addition, carriers have participated in international Maritime security operations, combating piracy in the Persian Gulf and off the coast of Somalia.[1][87]
Accidents and incidents
[edit]On 26 May 1981, an EA-6B Prowler crashed on the flight deck of Nimitz, killing 14 crewmen and injuring 45 others.[19][88] Forensic testing of the personnel involved showed that several tested positive for marijuana. While this was not found to have directly caused the crash, the investigation's findings prompted the introduction of mandatory drug testing of all service personnel.[89][90]
Pilots have been able to eject safely in several cases of ditched aircraft. However, fatal aircraft crashes have occurred; in 1994, Lieutenant Kara Hultgreen, the first female F-14 Tomcat pilot, was killed while attempting to land on board Abraham Lincoln during a training exercise.[60]
Fires have also caused damage to the ships; in May 2008, while rotating through to her new homeport at Yokosuka Naval Base in Yokosuka, Japan, George Washington suffered a fire that cost $70 million in repairs, injured 37 sailors and led to the ship undergoing three months of repairs at San Diego; this led to its having to miss the 2008 RIMPAC exercises and delayed the final withdrawal from service of USS Kitty Hawk. The fire was caused by unauthorized smoking near improperly stored flammable refrigerant compressor oil.[91][92][93]
Future and planned replacement
[edit]Nimitz-class carriers were initially designed to have a 50-year service life.[1] At the end of their service life, ships will be decommissioned. This process will first take place on Nimitz and is estimated to cost from $750 to $900 million. This compares with an estimated $53 million for a conventionally powered carrier. Most of the difference in cost is attributed to the deactivation of the nuclear power plants and the safe removal of radioactive material and other contaminated equipment.[94]
A new class of carriers, the Gerald R. Ford class, is being constructed to replace previous vessels after decommissioning. Ten of these are expected, and the first has entered service as of 22 July 2017 to replace Enterprise. Most of the rest of these new carriers are to replace the oldest Nimitz ships as they reach the end of their service lives.[95] The new carriers will have a similar design to George H.W. Bush (using an almost identical hull shape) and technological and structural improvements.[96]
The Navy reported in early 2022 that it was conducting a study to determine if the Nimitz-class carrier lives could be extended to as long as 55 years.[97][98]
See also
[edit]- Aircraft Carrier (Medium)
- List of aircraft carrier classes of the United States Navy
- List of aircraft carriers of the United States Navy
- List of aircraft carriers
- List of naval ship classes in service
- Modern US Navy carrier air operations
- Naval aviation
- Timeline of aircraft carriers of the United States Navy
Notes
[edit]Footnotes
[edit]- ^ The letters "CVN" denote the type of ship: "CV" is the hull classification symbol for aircraft carriers, and "N" indicates nuclear-powered propulsion. The number after the "CVN" means that this is the 68th "CV", or large aircraft carrier.
- ^ All monetary values are adjusted for inflation to 2000s figures
- ^ Although there are ten carrier air wings in the U.S. Navy, they are numbered between CVW-1 (USS Enterprise) and CVW-17 (USS Carl Vinson).
Citations
[edit]- ^ a b Johnston, Louis; Williamson, Samuel H. (2023). "What Was the U.S. GDP Then?". MeasuringWorth. Retrieved 30 November 2023. United States Gross Domestic Product deflator figures follow the MeasuringWorth series.
- ^ a b c d e f g Polmar 2004, p. 112
- ^ Kuperman, Alan; von Hippel, Frank (10 April 2020). "US Study of Reactor and Fuel Types to Enable Naval Reactors to Shift from HEU Fuel". International Panel on Fissile Materials. Archived from the original on 5 October 2021. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- ^ Hanlon, Brendan Patrick (19 May 2015). Validation of the Use of Low Enriched Uranium as a Replacement for Highly Enriched Uranium in US Submarine Reactors (PDF) (MSc). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2021. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- ^ a b c d e Gibbons, Tony (2001). The Encyclopedia of Ships. London, United Kingdom: Amber Books. p. 444. ISBN 978-1-905704-43-9.
- ^ a b Fontenoy, Paul E. (2006). Aircraft carriers: an illustrated history of their impact. ABC-CLIO Ltd. p. 349. ISBN 978-1-85109-573-5.
- ^ "25 Largest Warships In History". Science & Technology. 5 April 2017. Archived from the original on 12 April 2018. Retrieved 11 April 2018.
- ^ a b "USS Nimitz (CVN 68)". Naval Vessel Register. NAVSEA Shipbuilding Support Office. 27 June 2018. Archived from the original on 8 May 2021. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- ^ "An Alternate Method for the Determination of Aircraft Carrier Limiting Displacement for Strength". dspace.mit.edu. June 2001. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
- ^ a b Ronald O'Rourke (2005). "Navy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress". US Department of the Navy. Archived from the original on 1 December 2006. Retrieved 18 December 2009.
- ^ a b Polmar 2004, p. 113
- ^ Labayle Couhat 1980, p. 630
- ^ a b Darwin, Robert; Bowman, Howard; Hunstad, Mary; Leach, William; Williams, Frederick (2005). Aircraft Carrier Flight and Hangar Deck Fire Protection: History and Current Status. Defense Technical Information Center. p. 10. Archived from the original on 2 December 2010. Retrieved 1 July 2011.
- ^ a b Friedman 1983, p. 316
- ^ Jim Wilson "21st Century Carrier Force" Popular Mechanics October 1998, pp. 58–66
- ^ a b Sandra I. Erwin (July 2003). "7th Fleet Experiment Probes Navy's Near-Term Concerns". National Defense Industrial Association. Archived from the original on 2 December 2010. Retrieved 31 December 2009.
- ^ Patricia Kime (September 2003). "Navy Should Bolster Crisis Planning for Theater ASW". Navy League of the United States. Archived from the original on 5 March 2010. Retrieved 31 December 2009.
- ^ a b c "Cold War Ship – Nimitz class". Royal Air Force Museum London. 2008. Archived from the original on 27 July 2011. Retrieved 21 December 2009.
- ^ Wolfson, Dianna. "A Solution to the Inherent List on Nimitz Class Aircraft Carriers Archived 21 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine" MIT thesis 2004
- ^ "CVN 78 Construction & Facilities". Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. Archived from the original on 7 January 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
- ^ "George H.W. Bush (CVN 77) Christening" (PDF). Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. 7 October 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 June 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
- ^ "Our Heritage: Litton Industries". Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. Archived from the original on 16 March 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
- ^ a b "Information About Us". U.S. Navy. 14 October 2009. Archived from the original on 3 December 2010. Retrieved 24 May 2010.
- ^ Yardley, Roland; Schank, John; Kallimani, James (2007). A Methodology for Estimating the Effect of Aircraft Carrier Operational Cycles on the Maintenance Industrial Base: Technical Report. RAND Corporation. p. 30. ISBN 978-0-8330-4182-1.
- ^ Wertheim 2005, pp. 919–920
- ^ Wertheim 2007, p. 884
- ^ Wertheim 2007, p. 885
- ^ Polmar 2004, p. 108
- ^ "Nimitz docks off Chennai to 'build new relations with India'". The Indian Express. 3 July 2007. Retrieved 11 January 2010.
- ^ "NAM and Nimitz". Frontline. 14–27 July 2007. Archived from the original on 9 December 2010. Retrieved 11 January 2010.
{{cite magazine}}
: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link) - ^ First Carrier Countermeasure Anti-Torpedo Launched Archived 27 July 2015 at the Wayback Machine – Navy.mil, 6 June 2013
- ^ Navy Develops Torpedo Killing Torpedo Archived 8 December 2015 at the Wayback Machine – News.USNI.org, 20 June 2013
- ^ Navy Deploying New Anti-Torpedo Technology Archived 8 December 2015 at the Wayback Machine – Defensetech.org, 28 October 2013
- ^ US Navy Continues Work on Torpedo Warning System/Countermeasure Anti-Torpedo System Archived 8 December 2015 at the Wayback Machine – Navyrecognition.com, 12 March 2015
- ^ Surface Ship Torpedo Defense (SSTD) System. Office of the Director of Test and Evaluation. FY18 NAVY PROGRAMS.
- ^ The Navy Is Ripping Out Underperforming Anti-Torpedo Torpedoes From Its Supercarriers. The Drive.com/The War Zone. 5 February 2019.
- ^ "Navy Aircraft Carriers: Cost Effectiveness of Conventionally and Nuclear-powered Carriers Archived 18 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "RAINBOW JERSEYS: A Guide to the color-coded wardrobe on a U.S. Navy Flight Deck" (PDF). Naval History and Heritage Command. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 March 2023. Retrieved 24 May 2023.
- ^ Lambeth 2005, p. 89Lambeth, Benjamin (2005). American Carrier Air Power at the Dawn of a New Century. RAND Corporation. p. 138. ISBN 0-8330-3842-7.
- ^ Polmar 2004, p. 111
- ^ a b Stevens 1998, p. 24
- ^ Polmar 2004, p. 37
- ^ "Refueling and Complex Overhaul". Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. Retrieved 19 April 2008.[permanent dead link ]
- ^ "Costing the CVN-21: A DID Primer". Defense Industry Daily. 19 December 2005. Retrieved 27 December 2009.
- ^ "USS Nimitz Flight Deck". Surface Technologies Corporation. Archived from the original on 31 July 2009. Retrieved 2 January 2010.
- ^ Lt. Katharine Cerezo (20 February 2010). "Truman Flight Deck Receives New Non-Skid". U.S. Navy. Archived from the original on 22 July 2010. Retrieved 13 March 2010.
- ^ "Press Release". Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. 11 May 2009. Archived from the original on 21 May 2009. Retrieved 27 March 2010.
- ^ "Design Enhancements". Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. Archived from the original on 13 November 2009. Retrieved 28 May 2010.
- ^ "Aircraft Carrier Named the USS George H.W. Bush Commissioned". Fox News Channel. 10 January 2009. Archived from the original on 21 October 2012. Retrieved 14 January 2010.
- ^ "Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) Christening: Advanced Media Kit" (PDF). Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. Retrieved 27 December 2009.[permanent dead link ]
- ^ a b "Nimitz (CVN-68)". Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships. Naval History and Heritage Command. 8 May 2009. Archived from the original on 1 June 2019.
- ^ a b "USS Dwight D Eisenhower (CVN 69)". Naval Vessel Register. NAVSEA Shipbuilding Support Office. 27 June 2018. Archived from the original on 3 March 2021. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- ^ Evans, Mark L. (14 September 2016). "Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69)". Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships. Naval History and Heritage Command. Archived from the original on 31 May 2019.
- ^ Jennewien, Chris (10 January 2020). "USS Carl Vinson to Return to San Diego Following Year-and-a-Half Overhaul". Times of San Diego.
- ^ "USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70)". Naval Vessel Register. NAVSEA Shipbuilding Support Office. 27 June 2018. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- ^ Evans, Mark L. (18 December 2018). "Carl Vinson (CVN-70)". Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships. Naval History and Heritage Command. Archived from the original on 7 June 2019.
- ^ "USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71)". Naval Vessel Register. NAVSEA Shipbuilding Support Office. 27 June 2018. Archived from the original on 30 October 2020. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- ^ "USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72)". Naval Vessel Register. NAVSEA Shipbuilding Support Office. 3 October 2019. Archived from the original on 24 February 2021. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- ^ a b c Evans, Mark L. (4 April 2012). "Carl Vinson (CVN-70)". Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships. Naval History and Heritage Command. Archived from the original on 2 June 2019.
- ^ "USS George Washington (CVN 73)". Naval Vessel Register. NAVSEA Shipbuilding Support Office. 27 June 2018. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- ^ "USS John C Stennis (CVN 74)". Naval Vessel Register. NAVSEA Shipbuilding Support Office. 14 September 2020. Archived from the original on 10 January 2022. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- ^ "USS Harry S Truman (CVN 75)". Naval Vessel Register. NAVSEA Shipbuilding Support Office. 27 June 2018. Archived from the original on 4 March 2021. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- ^ "USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76)". Naval Vessel Register. NAVSEA Shipbuilding Support Office. 27 June 2018. Archived from the original on 27 February 2021. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- ^ "USS George H W Bush (CVN 77)". Naval Vessel Register. NAVSEA Shipbuilding Support Office. 27 June 2018. Archived from the original on 27 February 2021. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- ^ Love, Robert William (1992). History of the U.S.Navy: 1942–1991 v. 2. Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania: Stackpole Books. p. 755. ISBN 978-0-8117-1863-9.
- ^ "1987 Command History Archived 25 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine" U.S. Navy report. 6 December 1988.
- ^ Offley, Ed (2001). Pen and Sword: A Journalist's Guide to Covering the Military. Portland, Oregon: Marion Street Press. p. 224. ISBN 978-0-9665176-4-4.
- ^ Lambeth 2005, p. 6
- ^ Tucker, Spencer, ed. (2010). The Encyclopedia of Middle East Wars: The United States in the Persian Gulf, Afghanistan, and Iraq Conflicts. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. pp. 355, 361, 366–367. ISBN 9781851099474.
- ^ Richelson, Jeffrey (1999). The U.S. Intelligence Community. Boulder, Colorado: Perseus Books Group. p. 196. ISBN 978-0-8133-6893-1.
- ^ Kosovo: Operation "Allied Force" (PDF). Parliament of the United Kingdom. 29 April 1999. p. 16. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 November 2006.
- ^ "History of the Ship". USS Harry S. Truman, U.S. Navy. Archived from the original on 10 December 2012. Retrieved 16 January 2014.
- ^ "USS Carl Vinson". CNN. Archived from the original on 24 October 2010. Retrieved 2 April 2010.
- ^ "Appendix A: Navy-Marine Corps: Crisis Response and Combat Actions" (PDF). U.S. Navy. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 August 2009. Retrieved 31 May 2010.
- ^ "DoD Briefing on Operation Unified Assistance, the Post-Tsunami Relief Effort". US Department of Defense. 14 January 2005. Archived from the original on 29 May 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
- ^ Burke, Heather (1 September 2005). "New Orleans Gets More Troops to Stop Katrina Looting". Bloomberg L.P. Archived from the original on 10 April 2006. Retrieved 10 March 2017.
- ^ "U.S. ship coming to help retrieve victims of sea tragedy". GMA News. 25 June 2008. Archived from the original on 25 September 2015. Retrieved 26 December 2009.
- ^ Mike Mount and Larry Shaughnessy (13 January 2010). "First U.S. military aid reaches quake-stricken Haiti". CNN. Archived from the original on 18 February 2010. Retrieved 9 February 2010.
- ^ "Contracts: Navy". DefenseLink. 26 August 2009. Archived from the original on 1 September 2009. Retrieved 26 December 2009.
- ^ "CVN 70 Carl Vinson's Mid-Life RCOH Refueling & Maintenance". Defense Industry Daily. 14 July 2009. Archived from the original on 31 October 2010. Retrieved 31 December 2009.
- ^ Schank, John; Arena, Mark; Rushworth, Denis; Birkler, John; Chiesa, James (2003). Refueling and Complex Overhaul of the USS "Nimitz" (CVN 68): Lessons for the Future. Santa Monica, California: RAND Corporation. pp. xiii–xviii. ISBN 978-0-8330-3288-1.
- ^ "Upgraded Carrier Roosevelt Starts Pre-Deployment Exercises". USNI News. 12 January 2015. Archived from the original on 28 January 2017. Retrieved 13 December 2016.
- ^ "Nimitz Begins Planned Incremental Availability". U.S. Navy. 1 March 2004. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
- ^ "Reagan Sailors Visit Rio". U.S. Navy. June 2004. Archived from the original on 4 June 2011. Retrieved 9 January 2010.
- ^ Ripley, Tim (2001). Conflict in the Balkans, 1991–2000. Oxford, United Kingdom: Osprey Publishing. p. 92. ISBN 978-1-84176-290-6.
- ^ "USS Nimitz Launches First Sorties, Support Coalition Troops in Afghanistan". U.S. Navy. 21 September 2009. Archived from the original on 23 September 2009. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
- ^ Anderson, Kurt; Beaty, Jonathan (8 June 1981). "Night of Flaming Terror". Time. Archived from the original on 1 February 2009. Retrieved 2 October 2008.
- ^ Coombs, Robert; West, Louis (1991). Drug Testing: Issues and Options. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 3–21. ISBN 978-0-19-505414-9.
- ^ Abrams, Herbert (January 1987). "Human Instability and Nuclear Weapons". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. p. 34.
- ^ Dale Eisman (30 July 2008). "Two top Navy officers fired over $70 million carrier blaze". The Virginian-Pilot. Archived from the original on 26 August 2009. Retrieved 19 December 2009.
- ^ Liewer, Steve (7 October 2008). "Crew Faulted in Blaze on Carrier". San Diego Union-Tribune. Archived from the original on 25 November 2011.
- ^ "Casualties: U.S. Navy and Marine Corps Personnel Killed and Injured in Selected Accidents and Other Incidents Not Directly the Result of Enemy Action". Naval Historical Center. Archived from the original on 24 July 2010. Retrieved 13 March 2010.
- ^ Stevens 1998, p. 10
- ^ "CVN-77 Delivery Moved To December, Newport News on Track For January Commissioning". Defense Daily. 2006. Archived from the original on 8 July 2012. Retrieved 23 December 2009.
- ^ "CVN-78 Facts". Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. Archived from the original on 7 January 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
- ^ "Navy Could Extend the Oldest Nimitz-class Carriers, Decision in Next Budget". usni.org. 20 April 2022. Retrieved 20 July 2022.
- ^ "Nimitz Class Carriers Could Serve Longer Under New Shipbuilding Plan". thedrive.com. 21 April 2022. Retrieved 20 July 2022.
References
[edit]- Friedman, Norman (1983). U.S. Aircraft Carriers: An Illustrated Design History. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-0-87021-739-5.
- Labayle Couhat, Jean, ed. (1980). Combat Fleets of the World 1980/81: Their Ships, Aircraft, and Armament. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-0870211232.
- Lambeth, Benjamin (2005). American Carrier Air Power at the Dawn of a New Century. Santa Monica, California: RAND Corporation. ISBN 978-0-8330-3842-5.
- Polmar, Norman (2004). The Naval Institute Guide to the Ships and Aircraft of the U.S. Fleet. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-59114-685-8.
- Stevens, Ted (1998). Navy Aircraft Carriers: Cost-effectiveness of Conventionally and Nuclear-powered Carriers: Report to Congressional Requesters. Washington, D.C.: Government Accountability Office. ISBN 1-4289-7664-7.
- Wertheim, Eric (2005). The Naval Institute Guide to Combat Fleets of the World, 2005–2006: Their Ships, Aircraft, and Systems. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1591149347.
- Wertheim, Eric (2007). The Naval Institute Guide to Combat Fleets of the World: Their Ships, Aircraft and Systems. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-59114-955-2.
Further reading
[edit]- Schank, John F.; Mark V. Arena; Denis Rushworth; John Birkler; James Chiesa (2002). Refueling and Complex Overhaul of the USS Nimitz (CVN 68): Lessons for the Future. Santa Monica, California: Rand Corporation. ISBN 0-8330-3288-7. Retrieved 4 December 2010.
External links
[edit]- Discovery channel video Archived 7 May 2012 at the Wayback Machine
- Busting the speed myth of USS Enterprise and Nimitz-class nuclear-powered supercarrier, a special report by NavWeaps.Com