Jump to content

Talk:Animal Farm: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Boxer: source?
Undid revision 1249942227 by 200.68.159.195 (talk) Rv; off-topic
 
(30 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Vital article|topic=Art|level=5|class=C}}
{{British English}}
{{afd-merged-from|Animalism (Animal Farm)|Battle of the Cowshed|24 July 2009}}
{{afd-merged-from|Seven Commandments|Battle of the Cowshed|24 July 2009}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject Animals in media |class=b |importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Socialism |class=B |importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Novels |class=B |importance=High}}
}}
{{Article History
{{Article History
|action1=PR
|action1=PR
Line 22: Line 13:
|action2oldid=938271672
|action2oldid=938271672
|otd1date=2012-08-17|otd1oldid=507875002|otd2date=2018-08-17|otd2oldid=855345481
|otd1date=2012-08-17|otd1oldid=507875002|otd2date=2018-08-17|otd2oldid=855345481
|otd3date=2023-08-17|otd3oldid=1170842023
}}
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Animals in media |importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Socialism |importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Novels |importance=High}}
}}
{{British English}}
{{afd-merged-from|Animalism (Animal Farm)|Battle of the Cowshed|24 July 2009}}
{{afd-merged-from|Seven Commandments|Battle of the Cowshed|24 July 2009}}
{{annual readership}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
Line 33: Line 33:
|archive = Talk:Animal Farm/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:Animal Farm/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}

{{annual readership}}


==edit request on 12 Dec 2018 ==
==edit request on 12 Dec 2018 ==
Line 50: Line 48:
I wish to note that the list of stage adaptations of "Animal Farm" in this article is incomplete. The first version, adapted by [[Nelson S. Bond]] and published by [[Samuel French, Inc.]] in 1964 [https://www.amazon.com/Animal-Farm-Fable-Two-Acts/dp/0573605386 (still in print)] is still widely performed [https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-05-17-vl-374-story.html (example one)] [https://www.flocktheatre.org/animal-farm-2020 (example two) ] [https://www.facebook.com/events/104929599894765/ (example three)]
I wish to note that the list of stage adaptations of "Animal Farm" in this article is incomplete. The first version, adapted by [[Nelson S. Bond]] and published by [[Samuel French, Inc.]] in 1964 [https://www.amazon.com/Animal-Farm-Fable-Two-Acts/dp/0573605386 (still in print)] is still widely performed [https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-05-17-vl-374-story.html (example one)] [https://www.flocktheatre.org/animal-farm-2020 (example two) ] [https://www.facebook.com/events/104929599894765/ (example three)]


== Socialist? ==
== "Classic" ==
This article states that Orwell was a socialist. How could he be a socialist if he criticized socialism ("IngSoc") in ''1984''? [[Special:Contributions/24.198.105.135|24.198.105.135]] ([[User talk:24.198.105.135|talk]]) 01:22, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

:For starters, there's different forms of socialism? Also, one can believe in something while also being critical of aspects of it (how many Christians embrace all facets of Christianity?)? [[User:Doniago|DonIago]] ([[User talk:Doniago|talk]]) 13:30, 21 October 2022 (UTC)


"George Orwell's own Nineteen Eighty-Four is a classic dystopian novel about totalitarianism."
== Boxer ==


Is it ok to call something a "classic" as a factual statement in an encyclopedia? Or is it a subjective thing even in a case like "1984"? Isn't it against NPOV? I'm asking out of curiosity. [[User:Dornwald|Dornwald]] ([[User talk:Dornwald|talk]]) 00:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Boxer actually represents the strong soviet working force. Not the person mentioned in this article. [[Special:Contributions/76.67.165.147|76.67.165.147]] ([[User talk:76.67.165.147|talk]]) 15:13, 27 January 2023 (UTC)


:The current association is sourced. Do you have a [[WP:RS|source]] that supports your interpretation? [[User:Doniago|DonIago]] ([[User talk:Doniago|talk]]) 18:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
:That seems a bit POV and also unneeded; I've gone ahead and removed it. [[User:Doniago|DonIago]] ([[User talk:Doniago|talk]]) 02:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
::Thanks [[User:Dornwald|Dornwald]] ([[User talk:Dornwald|talk]]) 02:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:16, 7 October 2024

Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 15, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
May 4, 2019Peer reviewReviewed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 17, 2012, August 17, 2018, and August 17, 2023.

edit request on 12 Dec 2018

[edit]

Think is important to note that it was written in 1943. Source could be JOURNAL ARTICLE Revolution on Animal Farm: Orwell's Neglected Commentary V. C. Letemendia Journal of Modern Literature Vol. 18, No. 1 (Winter, 1992), pp. 127-137 (11 pages) at https://www.jstor.org/stable/3831551 where at P. 132 quoting Orwell author reports ... he did not mean pigs and men to appear reconciled completely at the end of the book. On the contrary "I meant it to end on a loud note of discord, for I wrote it immediately after the Teheran Conference [parodied by the final scene in Animal Farm] .." CEJL, III, pp. 459-59

[edit]

Here is a link for the preface. Can someone add it to main article, so that people know where the quote is coming from. https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/the-freedom-of-the-press/

Stage adaptations of Animal Farm -- request for addition

[edit]

I wish to note that the list of stage adaptations of "Animal Farm" in this article is incomplete. The first version, adapted by Nelson S. Bond and published by Samuel French, Inc. in 1964 (still in print) is still widely performed (example one) (example two) (example three)

"Classic"

[edit]

"George Orwell's own Nineteen Eighty-Four is a classic dystopian novel about totalitarianism."

Is it ok to call something a "classic" as a factual statement in an encyclopedia? Or is it a subjective thing even in a case like "1984"? Isn't it against NPOV? I'm asking out of curiosity. Dornwald (talk) 00:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That seems a bit POV and also unneeded; I've gone ahead and removed it. DonIago (talk) 02:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Dornwald (talk) 02:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]