Talk:Animal Farm: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 17:16, 7 October 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Animal Farm article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 31 days

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 15, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
May 4, 2019	Peer review	Reviewed

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 17, 2012, August 17, 2018, and August 17, 2023.

Animals in media (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animals in media, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Animals in mediaWikipedia:WikiProject Animals in mediaTemplate:WikiProject Animals in mediaAnimals in media

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels High‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Animalism (Animal Farm) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 July 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Animal Farm. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Seven Commandments was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 July 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Animal Farm. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

edit request on 12 Dec 2018

Think is important to note that it was written in 1943. Source could be JOURNAL ARTICLE Revolution on Animal Farm: Orwell's Neglected Commentary V. C. Letemendia Journal of Modern Literature Vol. 18, No. 1 (Winter, 1992), pp. 127-137 (11 pages) at https://www.jstor.org/stable/3831551 where at P. 132 quoting Orwell author reports ... he did not mean pigs and men to appear reconciled completely at the end of the book. On the contrary "I meant it to end on a loud note of discord, for I wrote it immediately after the Teheran Conference [parodied by the final scene in Animal Farm] .." CEJL, III, pp. 459-59

Link for Preface

Here is a link for the preface. Can someone add it to main article, so that people know where the quote is coming from. https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/the-freedom-of-the-press/

Stage adaptations of Animal Farm -- request for addition

I wish to note that the list of stage adaptations of "Animal Farm" in this article is incomplete. The first version, adapted by Nelson S. Bond and published by Samuel French, Inc. in 1964 (still in print) is still widely performed (example one) (example two) (example three)

"Classic"

"George Orwell's own Nineteen Eighty-Four is a classic dystopian novel about totalitarianism."

Is it ok to call something a "classic" as a factual statement in an encyclopedia? Or is it a subjective thing even in a case like "1984"? Isn't it against NPOV? I'm asking out of curiosity. Dornwald (talk) 00:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That seems a bit POV and also unneeded; I've gone ahead and removed it. DonIago (talk) 02:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dornwald (talk) 02:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{Skip to talk}}
+{{Talk header}}
 {{Article History
 |action1=PR
@@ Line 10: / Line 12: @@
 |action2result=reviewed
 |action2oldid=938271672
+|otd1date=2012-08-17|otd1oldid=507875002|otd2date=2018-08-17|otd2oldid=855345481
+|otd3date=2023-08-17|otd3oldid=1170842023
+}}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
+{{WikiProject Animals in media |importance=high}}
+{{WikiProject Socialism |importance=Mid}}
+{{WikiProject Novels |importance=High}}
 }}
-{{Talk header}}
-{{Skip to talk}}
 {{British English}}
+{{afd-merged-from|Animalism (Animal Farm)|Battle of the Cowshed|24 July 2009}}
-{{Vital article|topic=Art|level=5|class=C}}
+{{afd-merged-from|Seven Commandments|Battle of the Cowshed|24 July 2009}}
-{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
+{{annual readership}}
-{{WikiProject Animals in media |class=b |importance=high}}
-{{WikiProject Literature |class=B |importance=Mid}}
-{{WikiProject Socialism |class=B |importance=Mid}}
-{{WikiProject Novels |class=B |importance=High}}
-}}
-{{On this day|date1=2012-08-17|oldid1=507875002|date2=2018-08-17|oldid2=855345481}}
 {{User:MiszaBot/config
 |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
@@ Line 31: / Line 33: @@
 |archive = Talk:Animal Farm/Archive %(counter)d
 }}
-{{afd-merged-from|Animalism (Animal Farm)|Battle of the Cowshed|24 July 2009}}
-{{afd-merged-from|Seven Commandments|Battle of the Cowshed|24 July 2009}}
-{{annual readership}}
-{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Georgetown_University/WRIT_015-11-_Banned_and_Challenged_Books_(Fall_2019) | assignments = [[User:Flip Deciantis|Flip Deciantis]] | start_date = 2019-08-29 | end_date = 2019-12-13 }}
 ==edit request on 12 Dec 2018 ==
@@ Line 50: / Line 48: @@
 I wish to note that the list of stage adaptations of "Animal Farm" in this article is incomplete. The first version, adapted by [[Nelson S. Bond]] and published by [[Samuel French, Inc.]] in 1964 [https://www.amazon.com/Animal-Farm-Fable-Two-Acts/dp/0573605386 (still in print)] is still widely performed [https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-05-17-vl-374-story.html (example one)] [https://www.flocktheatre.org/animal-farm-2020 (example two) ] [https://www.facebook.com/events/104929599894765/ (example three)]
+== "Classic" ==
-==  Semi-protected edit request on 25 July 2020 ==
-{{Edit semi-protected|answered=yes}} Remove Paragraph
-Please remove
-“The CIA, from 1952 to 1957 in Operation Aedinosaur, sent millions of balloons carrying copies of the novel into Poland, Hungary and Czechoslovakia, whose air forces tried to shoot the balloons down.[43]”
-In reception section
-There is only one source which is not a super reliable source, however, I found multiple other sources mentioning this operation, but none of them show that animal farm was sent into the countries, but the book Doctor Zhivago was sent.
-Here is a reddit article that kind of adds to what I’m saying
-https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/eppc9s/from_1952_to_1957_the_cia_carried_out_operation/
-Note: Sorry if I formatted this post wrong this is my first time doing this
-[[User:Shadowrvn728|Shadowrvn728]] ([[User talk:Shadowrvn728|talk]]) 16:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
+"George Orwell's own Nineteen Eighty-Four is a classic dystopian novel about totalitarianism."
-Edit: Sorry, I’m not really sure how I’m supposed to edit but I just saw a previous post that answered my request
-[[User:Shadowrvn728|Shadowrvn728]] ([[User talk:Shadowrvn728|talk]]) 16:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
-:[[File:Pictogram voting wait.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Already done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> per above comment.&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Tartan357|<span style="font-family:Bookman;font-size:17px;color:#990000">'''''Tartan357'''''</span>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Tartan357|<span style="font-family:Bookman;font-size:14px;color:#224434">'''Talk'''</span>]])</sup> 10:09, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
+Is it ok to call something a "classic" as a factual statement in an encyclopedia? Or is it a subjective thing even in a case like "1984"? Isn't it against NPOV? I'm asking out of curiosity. [[User:Dornwald|Dornwald]] ([[User talk:Dornwald|talk]]) 00:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
-== Hit/struck vs. destroyed/levelled revert ==
+:That seems a bit POV and also unneeded; I've gone ahead and removed it. [[User:Doniago|DonIago]] ([[User talk:Doniago|talk]]) 02:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
-I should have mentioned in this [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Animal_Farm&diff=992359552&oldid=992358223] edit wrt near-destruction of the manuscript that the source [https://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/heritage/plaque-unveiled-where-george-orwell-s-animal-farm-almost-went-up-in-flames-1-1514101] uses the wording "destroyed" and not "hit". Go ahead and keep/change/re-source as you think is appropriate. [[User:Ideolomeme|Ideolomeme]] ([[User talk:Ideolomeme|talk]]) 22:06, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
+::Thanks [[User:Dornwald|Dornwald]] ([[User talk:Dornwald|talk]]) 02:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)