Jump to content

Cephalopod beak: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Excessive citations?
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
 
(36 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Body part of cephalopods}}
[[File:Squid beak measuring.jpg|thumb|The beak of a [[giant squid]], surrounded by the buccal mass and limbs]]
[[File:Giant squid beak 1875.jpg|thumb|The beak of a [[giant squid]]]]
All [[extant taxon|extant]] '''[[cephalopod]]s''' have a two-part '''beak''', or '''rostrum''', situated in the [[buccal mass]] and surrounded by the muscular [[Cephalopod limb|head appendages]]. The [[Dorsal (anatomy)|dorsal]] (upper) [[mandible]] fits into the [[ventral]] (lower) mandible and together they function in a scissor-like fashion.<ref name=ToL>Young, R.E., M. Vecchione & K.M. Mangold (1999). [http://tolweb.org/accessory/Cephalopoda_Glossary?acc_id=587 Cephalopoda Glossary]. [[Tree of Life Web Project]].</ref><ref>Young, R.E., M. Vecchione & K.M. Mangold (2000). [http://tolweb.org/accessory/Cephalopod_Beak_Terminology?acc_id=1980 Cephalopod Beak Terminology]. [[Tree of Life Web Project]].</ref> The beak may also be referred to as the '''mandibles''' or '''jaws'''.<ref name=jaws>Tanabe, K., Y. Hikida & Y. Iba (2006). Two coleoid jaws from the Upper Cretaceous of Hokkaido, Japan. ''Journal of Paleontology'' '''80'''(1): 138–145. {{DOI|10.1666/0022-3360(2006)080[0138:TCJFTU]2.0.CO;2}}</ref>
All [[extant taxon|extant]] '''[[cephalopod]]s''' have a two-part '''beak''', or '''[[Rostrum (anatomy)|rostrum]]''', situated in the [[buccal mass]] and surrounded by the muscular [[Cephalopod limb|head appendages]]. The [[Dorsal (anatomy)|dorsal]] (upper) [[mandible]] fits into the [[ventral]] (lower) mandible and together they function in a scissor-like fashion.<ref name=ToL>Young, R.E., M. Vecchione & K.M. Mangold (1999). [http://tolweb.org/accessory/Cephalopoda_Glossary?acc_id=587 Cephalopoda Glossary]. [[Tree of Life Web Project]].</ref><ref>Young, R.E., M. Vecchione & K.M. Mangold (2000). [http://tolweb.org/accessory/Cephalopod_Beak_Terminology?acc_id=1980 Cephalopod Beak Terminology]. [[Tree of Life Web Project]].</ref> The beak may also be referred to as the '''mandibles''' or '''jaws'''.<ref name=jaws>Tanabe, K., Y. Hikida & Y. Iba (2006). Two coleoid jaws from the Upper Cretaceous of Hokkaido, Japan. ''Journal of Paleontology'' '''80'''(1): 138–145. {{doi|10.1666/0022-3360(2006)080[0138:TCJFTU]2.0.CO;2}}</ref> These beaks are different from [[Beak|bird beaks]] because they crush bone while most bird beaks do not.


Fossilised remains of beaks are known from a number of cephalopod groups, both extant and extinct, including [[squid]]s, [[octopus]]es, [[belemnite]]s, and [[vampyromorph]]s.<ref>Zakharov, Y.D. & T.A. Lominadze (1983). New data on the jaw apparatus of fossil cephalopods. ''Lethaia'' '''16'''(1): 67–78. {{DOI|10.1111/j.1502-3931.1983.tb02000.x}}</ref><ref>Kanie, Y. (1998). New vampyromorph (Coleoidea: Cephalopoda) jaw apparatuses from the Late Cretaceous of Japan. ''Bulletin of Gumma Museum of Natural History'' '''2''': 23–34.</ref><ref>Tanabe, K. & N.H. Landman (2002). Morphological diversity of the jaws of Cretaceous Ammonoidea. ''Abhandlungen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, Wien'' '''57''': 157–165.</ref><ref name=jaws /><ref>Tanabe, K., P. Trask, R. Ross & Y. Hikida (2008). Late Cretaceous octobrachiate coleoid lower jaws from the north Pacific regions. ''Journal of Paleontology'' '''82'''(2): 398–408. {{DOI|10.1666/07-029.1}}</ref><ref>Klug, C., G. Schweigert, D. Fuchs & G. Dietl (2010). First record of a belemnite preserved with beaks, arms and ink sac from the Nusplingen Lithographic Limestone (Kimmeridgian, SW Germany). ''Lethaia'' '''43'''(4): 445–456. {{DOI|10.1111/j.1502-3931.2009.00203.x}}</ref><ref>Tanabe, K. (2012). Comparative morphology of modern and fossil coleoid jaw apparatuses. ''Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen'' '''266'''(1): 9–18. {{DOI|10.1127/0077-7749/2012/0243}}</ref> [[aptychus|Aptychi]] – paired plate-like structures found in [[ammonite]]s – may also have been jaw elements.<ref>Morton, N. (1981). Aptychi: the myth of the ammonite operculum. ''Lethaia'' '''14'''(1): 57–61. {{DOI|10.1111/j.1502-3931.1981.tb01074.x}}</ref><ref>Morton, N. & M. Nixon (1987). Size and function of ammonite aptychi in comparison with buccal masses of modem cephalopods. ''Lethaia'' '''20'''(3): 231–238. {{DOI|10.1111/j.1502-3931.1987.tb02043.x}}</ref><ref>Lehmann, U. & C. Kulicki (1990). Double function of aptychi (Ammonoidea) as jaw elements and opercula. ''Lethaia'' '''23''': 325–331. {{DOI|10.1111/j.1502-3931.1990.tb01365.x}}</ref><ref>Seilacher, A. (1993). Ammonite aptychi; how to transform a jaw into an operculum? ''American Journal of Science'' '''293''': 20–32. {{DOI|10.2475/ajs.293.A.20}}</ref>
Fossilised remains of beaks are known from a number of cephalopod groups, both extant and extinct, including [[squid]]s, [[octopus]]es, [[belemnite]]s, and [[vampyromorph]]s.<ref name=jaws /><ref>Zakharov, Y.D. & T.A. Lominadze (1983). New data on the jaw apparatus of fossil cephalopods. ''Lethaia'' '''16'''(1): 67–78. {{doi|10.1111/j.1502-3931.1983.tb02000.x}}</ref><ref>Kanie, Y. (1998). New vampyromorph (Coleoidea: Cephalopoda) jaw apparatuses from the Late Cretaceous of Japan. ''Bulletin of Gumma Museum of Natural History'' '''2''': 23–34.</ref><ref>Tanabe, K. & N.H. Landman (2002). Morphological diversity of the jaws of Cretaceous Ammonoidea. ''Abhandlungen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, Wien'' '''57''': 157–165.</ref><ref>Tanabe, K., P. Trask, R. Ross & Y. Hikida (2008). Late Cretaceous octobrachiate coleoid lower jaws from the north Pacific regions. ''Journal of Paleontology'' '''82'''(2): 398–408. {{doi|10.1666/07-029.1}}</ref><ref>Klug, C., G. Schweigert, D. Fuchs & G. Dietl (2010). First record of a belemnite preserved with beaks, arms and ink sac from the Nusplingen Lithographic Limestone (Kimmeridgian, SW Germany). ''Lethaia'' '''43'''(4): 445–456. {{doi|10.1111/j.1502-3931.2009.00203.x}}</ref><ref>Tanabe, K. (2012). Comparative morphology of modern and fossil coleoid jaw apparatuses. ''Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen'' '''266'''(1): 9–18. {{doi|10.1127/0077-7749/2012/0243}}</ref>{{Excessive citations inline|date=October 2024}} [[Aptychus|Aptychi]] – paired plate-like structures found in [[ammonite]]s – may also have been jaw elements.<ref>Morton, N. (1981). Aptychi: the myth of the ammonite operculum. ''Lethaia'' '''14'''(1): 57–61. {{doi|10.1111/j.1502-3931.1981.tb01074.x}}</ref><ref>Morton, N. & M. Nixon (1987). Size and function of ammonite aptychi in comparison with buccal masses of modem cephalopods. ''Lethaia'' '''20'''(3): 231–238. {{doi|10.1111/j.1502-3931.1987.tb02043.x}}</ref><ref>Lehmann, U. & C. Kulicki (1990). Double function of aptychi (Ammonoidea) as jaw elements and opercula. ''Lethaia'' '''23''': 325–331. {{doi|10.1111/j.1502-3931.1990.tb01365.x}}</ref><ref>Seilacher, A. (1993). Ammonite aptychi; how to transform a jaw into an operculum? ''American Journal of Science'' '''293''': 20–32. {{doi|10.2475/ajs.293.A.20}}</ref>


==Composition==
==Composition==
[[File:Squid beak measuring.jpg|thumb|The beak of a [[giant squid]], surrounded by the buccal mass and limbs]]
Composed primarily of [[chitin]] and cross-linked [[protein]]s,<ref>Saunders, W.B., C. Spinosa, C. Teichert & R.C. Banks (1978). {{cite web|url= http://cdn.palass.org/publications/palaeontology/volume_21/pdf/vol21_part1_pp129-141.pdf |title=The jaw apparatus of Recent ''Nautilus'' and its palaeontological implications. }} ''Palaeontology'' '''21'''(1): 129–141.</ref><ref>Hunt, S. & M. Nixon (1981). A comparative study of protein composition in the chitin-protein complexes of the beak, pen, sucker disc, radula and oesophageal cuticle of cephalopods. ''Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Comparative Biochemistry'' '''68'''(4): 535–546. {{DOI|10.1016/0305-0491(81)90071-7}}</ref><ref>Miserez, A., Y. Li, J.H. Waite & F. Zok (2007). {{cite web|url= http://www.materials.ucsb.edu/~zok/PDF/JumboMiserez.pdf |title=Jumbo squid beaks: Inspiration for design of robust organic composites. }} ''Acta Biomaterialia'' '''3'''(1): 139–149. {{DOI|10.1016/j.actbio.2006.09.004}}</ref><ref>[http://www.asknature.org/strategy/c8582fcb160cdd74fe4872bfb8052458 Organic composite is exceptionally robust: jumbo squid]. Ask Nature.</ref> beaks are more-or-less indigestible and are often the only identifiable cephalopod remains found in the stomachs of predatory species such as [[sperm whale]]s.<ref name=handbook>Clarke, M.R. (1986). ''A Handbook for the Identification of Cephalopod Beaks''. Oxford University Press, Oxford.</ref> Cephalopod beaks gradually become less stiff as one moves from the tip to the base, a gradient that results from differing chemical composition. In hydrated beaks of the [[Humboldt squid]] (''Dosidicus gigas'') this stiffness gradient spans two [[orders of magnitude]].<ref>Miserez, A., T. Schneberk, C. Sun, F.W. Zok & J.H. Waite (2008). The transition from stiff to compliant materials in squid beaks. ''Science'' '''319'''(5871): 1816–1819. {{DOI|10.1126/science.1154117}}</ref>
Composed primarily of [[chitin]] and cross-linked [[protein]]s,<ref>Saunders, W.B., C. Spinosa, C. Teichert & R.C. Banks (1978). {{cite web |url= http://cdn.palass.org/publications/palaeontology/volume_21/pdf/vol21_part1_pp129-141.pdf |title= The jaw apparatus of Recent ''Nautilus'' and its palaeontological implications. |access-date= 2016-09-12 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20161005201300/http://cdn.palass.org/publications/palaeontology/volume_21/pdf/vol21_part1_pp129-141.pdf |archive-date= 2016-10-05 |url-status= dead }} ''Palaeontology'' '''21'''(1): 129–141.</ref><ref>Hunt, S. & M. Nixon (1981). A comparative study of protein composition in the chitin-protein complexes of the beak, pen, sucker disc, radula and oesophageal cuticle of cephalopods. ''Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Comparative Biochemistry'' '''68'''(4): 535–546. {{doi|10.1016/0305-0491(81)90071-7}}</ref><ref>Miserez, A., Y. Li, J.H. Waite & F. Zok (2007). {{cite web |url= http://www.materials.ucsb.edu/~zok/PDF/JumboMiserez.pdf |title= Jumbo squid beaks: Inspiration for design of robust organic composites. |access-date= 2012-01-08 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160305193412/https://materials.ucsb.edu/~zok/PDF/JumboMiserez.pdf |archive-date= 2016-03-05 |url-status= dead}} ''Acta Biomaterialia'' '''3'''(1): 139–149. {{doi|10.1016/j.actbio.2006.09.004}}</ref><ref>[http://www.asknature.org/strategy/c8582fcb160cdd74fe4872bfb8052458 Organic composite is exceptionally robust: jumbo squid] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120106185330/http://asknature.org/strategy/c8582fcb160cdd74fe4872bfb8052458# |date=2012-01-06 }}. Ask Nature.</ref> beaks are more-or-less indigestible and are often the only identifiable cephalopod remains found in the stomachs of predatory species such as [[sperm whale]]s.<ref name=handbook>Clarke, M.R. (1986). ''A Handbook for the Identification of Cephalopod Beaks''. Oxford University Press, Oxford.</ref> Cephalopod beaks gradually become less stiff as one moves from the tip to the base, a gradient that results from differing chemical composition. In hydrated beaks of the [[Humboldt squid]] (''Dosidicus gigas'') this stiffness gradient spans two [[orders of magnitude]].<ref>Miserez, A., T. Schneberk, C. Sun, F.W. Zok & J.H. Waite (2008). The transition from stiff to compliant materials in squid beaks. ''Science'' '''319'''(5871): 1816–1819. {{doi|10.1126/science.1154117}}</ref>


{{Gallery
{{Gallery
| title=
| title=
| width=510 | height=250 | lines=2
| width=510 | height=250 | align=left
| align=left
| File:Lower beak Chiroteuthis picteti side view.jpg |Side view of the lower beak of ''[[Chiroteuthis picteti]]'' (3.6&nbsp;mm LRL, 160&nbsp;mm ML (estimate))<ref name=ToL /><br>{{3d glasses}}
| File:Lower beak Chiroteuthis picteti side view.jpg |Side view of the lower beak of ''[[Chiroteuthis picteti]]'' (3.6&nbsp;mm LRL, 160&nbsp;mm ML (estimate))<ref name=ToL /><br>{{3d glasses}}
| File:Upper beak Chiroteuthis picteti side view.jpg |Side view of the upper beak from the same specimen (2.7&nbsp;mm URL)<ref name=ToL />
| File:Upper beak Chiroteuthis picteti side view.jpg |Side view of the upper beak from the same specimen (2.7&nbsp;mm URL)<ref name=ToL />
}}
}}
{{-}}
{{Clear}}


==Measurements==
==Measurements==
[[File:Extracted giant squid beak.jpg|thumb|Giant squid beak and associated muscles with hand for scale]]
[[File:Extracted giant squid beak.jpg|thumb|Giant squid beak and associated muscles with hand for scale]]
The abbreviations '''LRL''' and '''URL''' are commonly used in [[teuthology]] to refer to ''lower rostral length'' and ''upper rostral length'', respectively. These are the standard measures of beak size in [[Decapodiformes]]; ''hood length'' is preferred for [[Octopodiformes]].<ref name=handbook /> They can be used to estimate the [[mantle (mollusc)|mantle]] length and total body weight of the original animal as well as the total ingested [[biomass]] of the species.<ref>Clarke, M.R. (1962). [https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/26204326 The identification of cephalopod "beaks" and the relationship between beak size and total body weight]. ''Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology'' '''8'''(10): 419–480.</ref><ref>Wolff, G.A. (1981). {{cite web|url= http://fishbull.noaa.gov/80-2/wolff.pdf |title=A beak key for eight eastern tropical Pacific cephalopod species with relationships between their beak dimensions and size. }} ''Fishery Bulletin'' '''80'''(2): 357–370.</ref><ref>Wolff, G.A. (1984). {{cite web|url= http://spo.nwr.noaa.gov/tr17opt.pdf |title=''Identification and estimation of size from the beaks of 18 species of cephalopods from the Pacific Ocean''. }} NOAA Technical Report NMFS 17, NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service.</ref><ref>Jackson, G.D. (1995). The use of beaks as tools for biomass estimation in the deepwater squid ''Moroteuthis ingens'' (Cephalopoda: Onychoteuthidae) in New Zealand waters. ''Polar Biology'' '''15'''(1): 9–14. {{DOI|10.1007/BF00236118}}</ref><ref>Jackson, G.D. & J.F. McKinnon (1996). Beak length analysis of arrow squid ''Nototodarus sloanii'' (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) in southern New Zealand waters. ''Polar Biology'' '''16'''(3): 227–230. {{DOI|10.1007/BF02329211}}</ref><ref>Jackson, G.D., N.G. Buxton & M.J.A. George (1997). Beak length analysis of ''Moroteuthis ingens'' (Cephalopoda: Onychoteuthidae) from the Falkland Islands region of the Patagonian Shelf. ''Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom'' '''77'''(4): 1235–1238. {{DOI|10.1017/S0025315400038765}}</ref><ref>Gröger, J., U. Piatkowski & H. Heinemann (2000). {{cite web|url= https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226651009_Beak_length_analysis_of_the_Southern_Ocean_squid_Psychroteuthis_glacialis(Cephalopoda_Psychroteuthidae)_and_its_use_for_size_and_biomass_estimation/file/32bfe50eebc3acf8f7.pdf |title=Beak length analysis of the Southern Ocean squid ''Psychroteuthis glacialis'' (Cephalopoda: Psychroteuthidae) and its use for size and biomass estimation. }} ''Polar Biology'' '''23'''(1): 70–74. {{DOI|10.1007/s003000050009}}</ref>
The abbreviations '''LRL''' and '''URL''' are commonly used in [[teuthology]] to refer to ''lower rostral length'' and ''upper rostral length'', respectively. These are the standard measures of beak size in [[Decapodiformes]]; ''hood length'' is preferred for [[Octopodiformes]].<ref name=handbook /> They can be used to estimate the [[mantle (mollusc)|mantle]] length and total body weight of the original animal as well as the total ingested [[biomass]] of the species.<ref>Clarke, M.R. (1962). [https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/26204326 The identification of cephalopod "beaks" and the relationship between beak size and total body weight]. ''Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology'' '''8'''(10): 419–480.</ref><ref>Wolff, G.A. (1981). {{cite web|url= http://fishbull.noaa.gov/80-2/wolff.pdf |title=A beak key for eight eastern tropical Pacific cephalopod species with relationships between their beak dimensions and size. }} ''Fishery Bulletin'' '''80'''(2): 357–370.</ref><ref>Wolff, G.A. (1984). {{cite web |url= http://spo.nwr.noaa.gov/tr17opt.pdf |title= ''Identification and estimation of size from the beaks of 18 species of cephalopods from the Pacific Ocean''. |access-date= 2013-02-03 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160304042522/http://spo.nwr.noaa.gov/tr17opt.pdf |archive-date= 2016-03-04 |url-status= dead}} NOAA Technical Report NMFS 17, NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service.</ref><ref>Jackson, G.D. (1995). The use of beaks as tools for biomass estimation in the deepwater squid ''Moroteuthis ingens'' (Cephalopoda: Onychoteuthidae) in New Zealand waters. ''Polar Biology'' '''15'''(1): 9–14. {{doi|10.1007/BF00236118}}</ref><ref>Jackson, G.D. & J.F. McKinnon (1996). Beak length analysis of arrow squid ''Nototodarus sloanii'' (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) in southern New Zealand waters. ''Polar Biology'' '''16'''(3): 227–230. {{doi|10.1007/BF02329211}}</ref><ref>Jackson, G.D., N.G. Buxton & M.J.A. George (1997). Beak length analysis of ''Moroteuthis ingens'' (Cephalopoda: Onychoteuthidae) from the Falkland Islands region of the Patagonian Shelf. ''Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom'' '''77'''(4): 1235–1238. {{doi|10.1017/S0025315400038765}}</ref><ref>Gröger, J., U. Piatkowski & H. Heinemann (2000). {{cite web|url= https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226651009 |title=Beak length analysis of the Southern Ocean squid ''Psychroteuthis glacialis'' (Cephalopoda: Psychroteuthidae) and its use for size and biomass estimation. }} ''Polar Biology'' '''23'''(1): 70–74. {{doi|10.1007/s003000050009}}</ref>


{{Gallery
{{Gallery
| title=
| title=
| width=320 | height=250 | lines=1
| width=320 | height=250 | align=left
| align=left
| File:Lower beak Chiroteuthis picteti oblique view.jpg |Lower rostral length
| File:Lower beak Chiroteuthis picteti oblique view.jpg |Lower rostral length
| File:Upper beak Chiroteuthis picteti oblique view.jpg |Upper rostral length
| File:Upper beak Chiroteuthis picteti oblique view.jpg |Upper rostral length
}}
}}
{{-}}
{{Clear}}


==References==
==References==
{{Commons category|Cephalopoda beak|Cephalopod beaks}}
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}


==Further reading==
==Further reading==
{{refbegin|40em}}
{{refbegin|40em}}
* Aldridge, A.E. (2009). Can beak shape help to research the life history of squid? ''New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research'' '''43'''(5): 1061–1067. {{DOI|10.1080/00288330.2009.9626529}}
* Aldridge, A.E. (2009). Can beak shape help to research the life history of squid? ''New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research'' '''43'''(5): 1061–1067. {{doi|10.1080/00288330.2009.9626529}}
* Bolstad, K.S. (2006). Sexual dimorphism in the beaks of ''Moroteuthis ingens'' Smith, 1881 (Cephalopoda: Oegopsida: Onychoteuthidae). ''New Zealand Journal of Zoology'' '''33'''(4): 317–327. {{DOI|10.1080/03014223.2006.9518459}}
* Bolstad, K.S. (2006). Sexual dimorphism in the beaks of ''Moroteuthis ingens'' Smith, 1881 (Cephalopoda: Oegopsida: Onychoteuthidae). ''New Zealand Journal of Zoology'' '''33'''(4): 317–327. {{doi|10.1080/03014223.2006.9518459}}
* Chen, X., H. Lu, B. Liu, Y. Chen, S. Li & M. Jin (2012). Species identification of ''Ommastrephes bartramii'', ''Dosidicus gigas'', ''Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis'' and ''Illex argentinus'' (Ommastrephidae) using beak morphological variables. ''Scientia Marina'' '''76'''(3): 473–481.{{DOI|10.3989/scimar.03408.05B}}
* Chen, X., H. Lu, B. Liu, Y. Chen, S. Li & M. Jin (2012). Species identification of ''Ommastrephes bartramii'', ''Dosidicus gigas'', ''Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis'' and ''Illex argentinus'' (Ommastrephidae) using beak morphological variables. ''Scientia Marina'' '''76'''(3): 473–481.{{doi|10.3989/scimar.03408.05B}}
* Cherel, Y. & K.A. Hobson (2005). Stable isotopes, beaks and predators: a new tool to study the trophic ecology of cephalopods, including giant and colossal squids. ''Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences'' '''272'''(1572): 1601–1607. {{DOI|10.1098/rspb.2005.3115}}
* Cherel, Y. & K.A. Hobson (2005). Stable isotopes, beaks and predators: a new tool to study the trophic ecology of cephalopods, including giant and colossal squids. ''Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences'' '''272'''(1572): 1601–1607. {{doi|10.1098/rspb.2005.3115}}
* Clarke, M.R. & N. MacLeod (1974). Cephalopod remains from a sperm whale caught off Vigo, Spain. ''Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom'' '''54'''(4): 959–968. {{DOI|10.1017/S0025315400057684}}
* Clarke, M.R. & N. MacLeod (1974). Cephalopod remains from a sperm whale caught off Vigo, Spain. ''Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom'' '''54'''(4): 959–968. {{doi|10.1017/S0025315400057684}}
* Clarke, M.R. & L. Maddock (1988). Beaks of living coleoid Cephalopoda. In: M.R. Clarke & E.R. Trueman (eds.) ''The Mollusca. Volume 12. Paleontology and Neontology of Cephalopods''. Academic Press, San Diego. pp.&nbsp;121–131.
* Clarke, M.R. & L. Maddock (1988). Beaks of living coleoid Cephalopoda. In: M.R. Clarke & E.R. Trueman (eds.) ''The Mollusca. Volume 12. Paleontology and Neontology of Cephalopods''. Academic Press, San Diego. pp.&nbsp;121–131.
* Clarke, M.R. & R.E. Young (1998). Description and analysis of cephalopod beaks from stomachs of six species of odontocete cetaceans stranded on Hawaiian shores. ''Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom'' '''78'''(2): 623–641. {{DOI|10.1017/S0025315400041667}}
* Clarke, M.R. & R.E. Young (1998). Description and analysis of cephalopod beaks from stomachs of six species of odontocete cetaceans stranded on Hawaiian shores. ''Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom'' '''78'''(2): 623–641. {{doi|10.1017/S0025315400041667}}
* Hernańdez-García, V., U. Piatkowski & M.R. Clarke (1998). Development of the darkening of ''Todarodes sagittatus'' beaks and its relation to growth and reproduction. ''South African Journal of Marine Science'' '''20'''(1): 363–373. {{DOI|10.2989/025776198784126485}}
* Hernańdez-García, V., U. Piatkowski & M.R. Clarke (1998). Development of the darkening of ''Todarodes sagittatus'' beaks and its relation to growth and reproduction. ''South African Journal of Marine Science'' '''20'''(1): 363–373. {{doi|10.2989/025776198784126485}}
* Hernández-López, J.L. & J.J. Castro-Hernández (2001). {{cite web|url=http://www.redmic.es/bibliografia/Docum_01922.pdf |title=Age determined from the daily deposition of concentric rings on common octopus (''Octopus vulgaris'') beaks. }}{{dead link|date=November 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} ''Fishery Bulletin'' '''99'''(4): 679–684.
* Hernández-López, J.L. & J.J. Castro-Hernández (2001). {{cite web |url=http://www.redmic.es/bibliografia/Docum_01922.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130513000659/http://www.redmic.es/bibliografia/Docum_01922.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-date=2013-05-13 |title=Age determined from the daily deposition of concentric rings on common octopus (''Octopus vulgaris'') beaks. }} ''Fishery Bulletin'' '''99'''(4): 679–684.
* Hobson, K.A. & Y. Cherel (2006). Isotopic reconstruction of marine food webs using cephalopod beaks: new insight from captively raised ''Sepia officinalis''. ''Canadian Journal of Zoology'' '''84'''(5): 766–770. {{DOI|10.1139/z06-049}}
* Hobson, K.A. & Y. Cherel (2006). Isotopic reconstruction of marine food webs using cephalopod beaks: new insight from captively raised ''Sepia officinalis''. ''Canadian Journal of Zoology'' '''84'''(5): 766–770. {{doi|10.1139/z06-049}}
* Hsu, C.-C. (2002). [http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0421103-214602 Geomorphometric study of ''Octopus'' and ''Cistopus'' (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) based on landmarks of beaks]. Master's thesis, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
* Hsu, C.-C. (2002). [http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0421103-214602 Geomorphometric study of ''Octopus'' and ''Cistopus'' (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) based on landmarks of beaks]. Master's thesis, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
* Ivanovic, M.L. & N.E. Brunetti (1997). [http://hdl.handle.net/1834/1926 Description of ''Illex argentinus'' beaks and rostral length relationships with size and weight of squids]. ''Revista de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero'' '''11''': 135–144.
* Ivanovic, M.L. & N.E. Brunetti (1997). [http://hdl.handle.net/1834/1926 Description of ''Illex argentinus'' beaks and rostral length relationships with size and weight of squids]. ''Revista de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero'' '''11''': 135–144.
* Lalas, C. (2009). Estimates of size for the large octopus ''Macroctopus maorum'' from measures of beaks in prey remains. ''New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research'' '''43'''(2): 635–642. {{DOI|10.1080/00288330909510029}}
* Lalas, C. (2009). Estimates of size for the large octopus ''Macroctopus maorum'' from measures of beaks in prey remains. ''New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research'' '''43'''(2): 635–642. {{doi|10.1080/00288330909510029}}
* Lefkaditou E. & P. Bekas (2004). [https://archive.is/20130702042448/http://marine.ojs.beta.ekt.gr/index.php/marine/article/view/219 Analysis of beak morphometry of the horned octopus ''Eledone cirrhosa'' (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) in the Thracian Sea (NE Mediterranean)]. ''Mediterranean Marine Science'' '''5'''(1): 143–149.
* Lefkaditou E. & P. Bekas (2004). [https://archive.today/20130702042448/http://marine.ojs.beta.ekt.gr/index.php/marine/article/view/219 Analysis of beak morphometry of the horned octopus ''Eledone cirrhosa'' (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) in the Thracian Sea (NE Mediterranean)]. ''Mediterranean Marine Science'' '''5'''(1): 143–149.
* Lu, C.C. & R. Ickeringill (2002). {{cite web|url= http://museumvictoria.com.au/pages/7637/science-reports-6.pdf |title=Cephalopod beak identification and biomass estimation techniques: tools for dietary studies of southern Australian finfishes. }} ''Museum Victoria Science Reports'' '''6''': 1–65.
* Lu, C.C. & R. Ickeringill (2002). {{cite web |url= http://museumvictoria.com.au/pages/7637/science-reports-6.pdf |title= Cephalopod beak identification and biomass estimation techniques: tools for dietary studies of southern Australian finfishes. |access-date= 2013-04-07 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160304085135/http://museumvictoria.com.au/pages/7637/science-reports-6.pdf |archive-date= 2016-03-04 |url-status= dead }} ''Museum Victoria Science Reports'' '''6''': 1–65.
* Martínez, P., A. Sanjuan & Á. Guerra (2002). Identification of ''Illex coindetii'', ''I.&nbsp;illecebrosus'' and ''I.&nbsp;argentinus'' (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) throughout the Atlantic Ocean; by body and beak characters. ''Marine Biology'' '''141'''(1): 131–143. {{DOI|10.1007/s00227-002-0796-7}}
* Martínez, P., A. Sanjuan & Á. Guerra (2002). Identification of ''Illex coindetii'', ''I.&nbsp;illecebrosus'' and ''I.&nbsp;argentinus'' (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) throughout the Atlantic Ocean; by body and beak characters. ''Marine Biology'' '''141'''(1): 131–143. {{doi|10.1007/s00227-002-0796-7}}
* Ogden, R.S., A.L. Allcock, P.C. Watts & J.P. Thorpe (1998). The role of beak shape in octopodid taxonomy. ''South African Journal of Marine Science'' '''20'''(1): 29–36. {{DOI|10.2989/025776198784126476}}
* Ogden, R.S., A.L. Allcock, P.C. Watts & J.P. Thorpe (1998). The role of beak shape in octopodid taxonomy. ''South African Journal of Marine Science'' '''20'''(1): 29–36. {{doi|10.2989/025776198784126476}}
* Roeleveld, M.A.C. (2000). Giant squid beaks: implications for systematics. ''Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK'' '''80'''(1): 185–187. {{DOI|10.1017/S0025315499001769}}
* Roeleveld, M.A.C. (2000). Giant squid beaks: implications for systematics. ''Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK'' '''80'''(1): 185–187. {{doi|10.1017/S0025315499001769}}
* Uchikawa, K., M. Sakai, T. Wakabayashi & T. Ichii (2009). The relationship between paralarval feeding and morphological changes in the proboscis and beaks of the neon flying squid ''Ommastrephes bartramii''. ''Fisheries Science'' '''75'''(2): 317–323. {{DOI|10.1007/s12562-008-0036-2}}
* Uchikawa, K., M. Sakai, T. Wakabayashi & T. Ichii (2009). The relationship between paralarval feeding and morphological changes in the proboscis and beaks of the neon flying squid ''Ommastrephes bartramii''. ''Fisheries Science'' '''75'''(2): 317–323. {{doi|10.1007/s12562-008-0036-2}}
* Xavier, J.C., M.R. Clarke, M.C. Magalhães, G. Stowasser, C. Blanco & Y. Cherel (2007). {{cite web|url= http://www.horta.uac.pt/intradop/images/stories/arquipelago/24/24_41-48_Xavier_etal%20.pdf |title=Current status of using beaks to identify cephalopods: III International Workshop and training course on cephalopod beaks, Faial Island, Azores, April 2007. }} ''Arquipélago: Life and Marine Sciences'' '''24''': 41–48.
* Xavier, J.C., M.R. Clarke, M.C. Magalhães, G. Stowasser, C. Blanco & Y. Cherel (2007). {{cite web |url= http://www.horta.uac.pt/intradop/images/stories/arquipelago/24/24_41-48_Xavier_etal%20.pdf |title= Current status of using beaks to identify cephalopods: III International Workshop and training course on cephalopod beaks, Faial Island, Azores, April 2007. |access-date= 2013-04-07 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160305005754/http://www.horta.uac.pt/intradop/images/stories/arquipelago/24/24_41-48_Xavier_etal%20.pdf |archive-date= 2016-03-05 |url-status= dead }} ''Arquipélago: Life and Marine Sciences'' '''24''': 41–48.
* Xavier, J.C. & Y. Cherel (2009). {{cite web|url= http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/about_bas/publications/cephalopod-beak-guide.pdf |title=''Cephalopod Beak Guide for the Southern Ocean''. }} British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge. 129&nbsp;pp.
* Xavier, J.C. & Y. Cherel (2009). {{cite web |url= http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/about_bas/publications/cephalopod-beak-guide.pdf |title= ''Cephalopod Beak Guide for the Southern Ocean''. }} British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge. 129&nbsp;pp.
* Xavier, J.C., R.A. Phillips & Y. Cherel (2011). Cephalopods in marine predator diet assessments: why identifying upper and lower beaks is important. ''ICES Journal of Marine Science'' '''68'''(9): 1857–1864. {{DOI|10.1093/icesjms/fsr103}}
* Xavier, J.C., R.A. Phillips & Y. Cherel (2011). Cephalopods in marine predator diet assessments: why identifying upper and lower beaks is important. ''ICES Journal of Marine Science'' '''68'''(9): 1857–1864. {{doi|10.1093/icesjms/fsr103}}
{{refend}}
{{refend}}

{{Commons category|Cephalopoda beak|Cephalopod beaks}}


{{Cephalopod anatomy}}
{{Cephalopod anatomy}}

Latest revision as of 08:00, 8 October 2024

The beak of a giant squid

All extant cephalopods have a two-part beak, or rostrum, situated in the buccal mass and surrounded by the muscular head appendages. The dorsal (upper) mandible fits into the ventral (lower) mandible and together they function in a scissor-like fashion.[1][2] The beak may also be referred to as the mandibles or jaws.[3] These beaks are different from bird beaks because they crush bone while most bird beaks do not.

Fossilised remains of beaks are known from a number of cephalopod groups, both extant and extinct, including squids, octopuses, belemnites, and vampyromorphs.[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][excessive citations] Aptychi – paired plate-like structures found in ammonites – may also have been jaw elements.[10][11][12][13]

Composition

[edit]
The beak of a giant squid, surrounded by the buccal mass and limbs

Composed primarily of chitin and cross-linked proteins,[14][15][16][17] beaks are more-or-less indigestible and are often the only identifiable cephalopod remains found in the stomachs of predatory species such as sperm whales.[18] Cephalopod beaks gradually become less stiff as one moves from the tip to the base, a gradient that results from differing chemical composition. In hydrated beaks of the Humboldt squid (Dosidicus gigas) this stiffness gradient spans two orders of magnitude.[19]

Measurements

[edit]
Giant squid beak and associated muscles with hand for scale

The abbreviations LRL and URL are commonly used in teuthology to refer to lower rostral length and upper rostral length, respectively. These are the standard measures of beak size in Decapodiformes; hood length is preferred for Octopodiformes.[18] They can be used to estimate the mantle length and total body weight of the original animal as well as the total ingested biomass of the species.[20][21][22][23][24][25][26]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Young, R.E., M. Vecchione & K.M. Mangold (1999). Cephalopoda Glossary. Tree of Life Web Project.
  2. ^ Young, R.E., M. Vecchione & K.M. Mangold (2000). Cephalopod Beak Terminology. Tree of Life Web Project.
  3. ^ a b Tanabe, K., Y. Hikida & Y. Iba (2006). Two coleoid jaws from the Upper Cretaceous of Hokkaido, Japan. Journal of Paleontology 80(1): 138–145. doi:10.1666/0022-3360(2006)080[0138:TCJFTU2.0.CO;2]
  4. ^ Zakharov, Y.D. & T.A. Lominadze (1983). New data on the jaw apparatus of fossil cephalopods. Lethaia 16(1): 67–78. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1983.tb02000.x
  5. ^ Kanie, Y. (1998). New vampyromorph (Coleoidea: Cephalopoda) jaw apparatuses from the Late Cretaceous of Japan. Bulletin of Gumma Museum of Natural History 2: 23–34.
  6. ^ Tanabe, K. & N.H. Landman (2002). Morphological diversity of the jaws of Cretaceous Ammonoidea. Abhandlungen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, Wien 57: 157–165.
  7. ^ Tanabe, K., P. Trask, R. Ross & Y. Hikida (2008). Late Cretaceous octobrachiate coleoid lower jaws from the north Pacific regions. Journal of Paleontology 82(2): 398–408. doi:10.1666/07-029.1
  8. ^ Klug, C., G. Schweigert, D. Fuchs & G. Dietl (2010). First record of a belemnite preserved with beaks, arms and ink sac from the Nusplingen Lithographic Limestone (Kimmeridgian, SW Germany). Lethaia 43(4): 445–456. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.2009.00203.x
  9. ^ Tanabe, K. (2012). Comparative morphology of modern and fossil coleoid jaw apparatuses. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 266(1): 9–18. doi:10.1127/0077-7749/2012/0243
  10. ^ Morton, N. (1981). Aptychi: the myth of the ammonite operculum. Lethaia 14(1): 57–61. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1981.tb01074.x
  11. ^ Morton, N. & M. Nixon (1987). Size and function of ammonite aptychi in comparison with buccal masses of modem cephalopods. Lethaia 20(3): 231–238. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1987.tb02043.x
  12. ^ Lehmann, U. & C. Kulicki (1990). Double function of aptychi (Ammonoidea) as jaw elements and opercula. Lethaia 23: 325–331. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1990.tb01365.x
  13. ^ Seilacher, A. (1993). Ammonite aptychi; how to transform a jaw into an operculum? American Journal of Science 293: 20–32. doi:10.2475/ajs.293.A.20
  14. ^ Saunders, W.B., C. Spinosa, C. Teichert & R.C. Banks (1978). "The jaw apparatus of Recent Nautilus and its palaeontological implications" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-10-05. Retrieved 2016-09-12. Palaeontology 21(1): 129–141.
  15. ^ Hunt, S. & M. Nixon (1981). A comparative study of protein composition in the chitin-protein complexes of the beak, pen, sucker disc, radula and oesophageal cuticle of cephalopods. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Comparative Biochemistry 68(4): 535–546. doi:10.1016/0305-0491(81)90071-7
  16. ^ Miserez, A., Y. Li, J.H. Waite & F. Zok (2007). "Jumbo squid beaks: Inspiration for design of robust organic composites" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-05. Retrieved 2012-01-08. Acta Biomaterialia 3(1): 139–149. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2006.09.004
  17. ^ Organic composite is exceptionally robust: jumbo squid Archived 2012-01-06 at the Wayback Machine. Ask Nature.
  18. ^ a b Clarke, M.R. (1986). A Handbook for the Identification of Cephalopod Beaks. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  19. ^ Miserez, A., T. Schneberk, C. Sun, F.W. Zok & J.H. Waite (2008). The transition from stiff to compliant materials in squid beaks. Science 319(5871): 1816–1819. doi:10.1126/science.1154117
  20. ^ Clarke, M.R. (1962). The identification of cephalopod "beaks" and the relationship between beak size and total body weight. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology 8(10): 419–480.
  21. ^ Wolff, G.A. (1981). "A beak key for eight eastern tropical Pacific cephalopod species with relationships between their beak dimensions and size" (PDF). Fishery Bulletin 80(2): 357–370.
  22. ^ Wolff, G.A. (1984). "Identification and estimation of size from the beaks of 18 species of cephalopods from the Pacific Ocean" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2013-02-03. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 17, NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service.
  23. ^ Jackson, G.D. (1995). The use of beaks as tools for biomass estimation in the deepwater squid Moroteuthis ingens (Cephalopoda: Onychoteuthidae) in New Zealand waters. Polar Biology 15(1): 9–14. doi:10.1007/BF00236118
  24. ^ Jackson, G.D. & J.F. McKinnon (1996). Beak length analysis of arrow squid Nototodarus sloanii (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) in southern New Zealand waters. Polar Biology 16(3): 227–230. doi:10.1007/BF02329211
  25. ^ Jackson, G.D., N.G. Buxton & M.J.A. George (1997). Beak length analysis of Moroteuthis ingens (Cephalopoda: Onychoteuthidae) from the Falkland Islands region of the Patagonian Shelf. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 77(4): 1235–1238. doi:10.1017/S0025315400038765
  26. ^ Gröger, J., U. Piatkowski & H. Heinemann (2000). "Beak length analysis of the Southern Ocean squid Psychroteuthis glacialis (Cephalopoda: Psychroteuthidae) and its use for size and biomass estimation". Polar Biology 23(1): 70–74. doi:10.1007/s003000050009

Further reading

[edit]