Jump to content

Design for Living (film): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 1 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta15)
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Altered title. Added website. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by BorgQueen | Linked from User:Siroxo/List_of_Criterion_Collection_releases | #UCB_webform_linked 840/1861
(44 intermediate revisions by 35 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|1933 American film}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2021}}
{{Infobox film
{{Infobox film
| name = Design for Living
| name = Design for Living
| image = Designforliving1933.jpg
| image = Designforliving1933.jpg
| caption =
| caption = Theatrical release poster
| director = [[Ernst Lubitsch]]
| director = [[Ernst Lubitsch]]
| producer = Ernst Lubitsch
| producer = Ernst Lubitsch
| screenplay = [[Ben Hecht]]
| screenplay = [[Ben Hecht]]
| based on = {{based on|''[[Design for Living]]''|[[Noël Coward]]}}
| based_on = {{based on|''[[Design for Living]]''|[[Noël Coward]]}}
| starring = {{Plainlist|
| starring = {{Plainlist|
* [[Fredric March]]
* [[Fredric March]]
Line 17: Line 19:
| studio = [[Paramount Pictures]]
| studio = [[Paramount Pictures]]
| distributor = Paramount Pictures
| distributor = Paramount Pictures
| released = {{Film date|1933|12|29|USA}}
| released = {{Film date|1933|12|29|United States}}
| runtime = 91 minutes
| runtime = 91 minutes
| country = United States
| country = United States
Line 25: Line 27:
}}
}}


'''''Design for Living''''' is a 1933 American [[Pre-Code Hollywood|pre-Code]] [[comedy film]] produced and directed by [[Ernst Lubitsch]] and starring [[Fredric March]], [[Gary Cooper]], and [[Miriam Hopkins]]. Based on the premise of the 1932 play ''[[Design for Living]]'' by [[Noël Coward]], with a screenplay by [[Ben Hecht]], the film is about a woman who cannot decide between two men who love her, and the trio agree to try living together in a platonic friendly relationship.
'''''Design for Living''''' is a 1933 American [[Pre-Code Hollywood|pre-Code]] [[romantic comedy|romantic comedy film]] directed by [[Ernst Lubitsch]] from a screenplay by [[Ben Hecht]], based on the 1932 [[Design for Living|play of the same name]] by [[Noël Coward]]. Starring [[Fredric March]], [[Gary Cooper]], and [[Miriam Hopkins]], the film is about a woman who cannot decide between two men who love her, and the trio agree to try living together in a platonic friendly relationship.


Criticism was mixed, with some critics praising the film, but many were ambivalent about its great departure from Coward's play. Coward said, "I'm told that there are three of my original lines left in the film—such original ones as 'Pass the mustard'."<ref>Richards, Dick. ''The Wit of Noël Coward''. Sphere Books, 1970, p. 86.</ref> The film was a box office success,<ref>THE YEAR IN HOLLYWOOD: 1984 May Be Remembered as the Beginning of the Sweetness-and-Light Era
Criticism was mixed, with some critics praising the film, but many were ambivalent about its great departure from Coward's play. Coward said, "I'm told that there are three of my original lines left in the film—such original ones as 'Pass the mustard'."<ref>Richards, Dick. ''The Wit of Noël Coward''. Sphere Books, 1970, p. 86.</ref> The film was a box office success,<ref>{{Cite news|title=THE YEAR IN HOLLYWOOD: 1984 May Be Remembered as the Beginning of the Sweetness-and-Light Era|author=DOUGLAS W. CHURCHILL|date=December 30, 1934|work=New York Times|page=X5}}</ref> ranking as one of the top ten highest-grossing films of 1933. All three of the lead actors—March, Cooper, and Hopkins—received attention from this film as they were all at the peak of their careers.
By DOUGLAS W. CHURCHILL.HOLLYWOOD.. New York Times (1923-Current file) [New York, N.Y] 30 Dec 1934: X5.</ref> ranking as one of the top ten highest-grossing films of 1933. All three of the lead actors—March, Cooper, and Hopkins—received attention from this film as they were all at the peak of their careers.


==Plot==
==Plot==
While en route to [[Paris]] via train, commercial artist Gilda Farrell meets artist George Curtis and playwright Thomas Chambers, fellow Americans who share an apartment in the French capital. Gilda works for advertising executive Max Plunkett, who has had no success in his efforts to engage her in a romantic relationship. Tom and George each realize the other is in love with Gilda, and although they agree to forget her, they cannot resist her when she comes to visit. Unable to choose between the two, she proposes she live with them as a friend, muse, and critic—with the understanding they will not have sex.
While en route to Paris via train, commercial artist Gilda Farrell meets artist George Curtis and playwright Thomas Chambers, fellow Americans who share an apartment in the French capital. Gilda works for advertising executive Max Plunkett, who has had no success in his efforts to engage her in a romantic relationship. Tom and George each realize the other is in love with Gilda, and although they agree to forget her, they cannot resist her when she comes to visit. Unable to choose between the two, she proposes she live with them as a friend, muse, and critic—with the understanding they will not have sex.


Gilda arranges for a producer to read Tom's play and he goes to [[London]] to oversee the staging of his work. During his absence, Gilda and George become involved romantically, much to Tom's consternation. One night at the theatre he meets Max, who tells him George has become highly successful. Tom returns to Paris and discovers George has vacated their apartment and moved into a [[Penthouse apartment|penthouse]] with Gilda. George is in [[Nice]] painting a portrait, and Gilda and Tom rekindle their affair.
Gilda arranges for a producer to read Tom's play and he goes to London to oversee the staging of his work. During his absence, Gilda and George become involved romantically and sexually, much to Tom's chagrin. Months later, Tom bumps into Max at the theatre. Max tells him that George has become highly successful as a portrait artist. Tom returns to Paris and discovers George has vacated their apartment and moved into a [[penthouse apartment|penthouse]] with Gilda. With George in [[Nice]] painting a portrait, Gilda and Tom rekindle their affair.


George returns and, realizing his former roommate and current lover have been trysting while he was away, orders the two to get out. Gilda decides to end the men's rivalry by marrying Max in [[Manhattan]], but is so upset when she receives potted plants from her former beaux she fails to consummate the marriage. When Max hosts a party for his advertising clients, Tom and George crash the event and hide in Gilda's bedroom. Max finds the three laughing on the bed and orders the men out, and a brawl ensues, prompting all the guests to depart. Gilda announces she is leaving her husband, and she, Tom, and George decide to return to Paris and their unusual living arrangement.
George returns and, realizing his former roommate and current lover have been trysting while he was away, orders the two to get out. Gilda decides to end the men's rivalry by marrying Max in [[Manhattan]], but she is so upset when she receives potted plants from her former beaux that she cannot consummate the marriage. When Max hosts a party for his advertising clients, Tom and George crash the event and hide in Gilda's bedroom. Max finds the three laughing on the bed and orders the men out; a brawl ensues, prompting all the guests to depart. Gilda announces she is leaving her husband, and she, Tom, and George decide to return to Paris and their unusual living arrangement.


==Cast==
==Cast==
Line 43: Line 44:
* [[Edward Everett Horton]] as Max Plunkett
* [[Edward Everett Horton]] as Max Plunkett
* [[Franklin Pangborn]] as Mr. Douglas
* [[Franklin Pangborn]] as Mr. Douglas
* [[Isabel Jewell]] as Plunkett's Stenographer
* [[Isabel Jewell]] as Max's stenographer
* [[Jane Darwell]] as Curtis' Housekeeper
* [[Jane Darwell]] as George's housekeeper
* [[Wyndham Standing]] as Max's Butler
* [[Wyndham Standing]] as Max's butler


==Production==
==Production==
In the late 1920s and early 1930s, Coward wrote a succession of popular hit plays.<ref>Lahr, John, ''Coward the Playwright''. London: Methuen 1982. {{ISBN|0-413-48050-X}}, p. 93</ref> On [[Broadway theatre|Broadway]], ''Design for Living'' was a popular and critical hit starring [[Lynn Fontanne]], [[Alfred Lunt]] and Coward, and its risqué [[Ménage à trois|ménage-à-trois]] theme made it controversial.<ref>Lesley, Cole, ''The Life of Noël Coward''. Cape 1976. {{ISBN|0-224-01288-6}}, pp. 160–61</ref><ref name=Hoare>Hoare, Philip, ''Noël Coward, A Biography''. [[Sinclair-Stevenson]] 1995. {{ISBN|1-85619-265-2}}, p. 251</ref> ''Design for Living'' was one of more than a dozen of Coward's plays made into feature films.<ref name=Hoare/>
In the late 1920s and early 1930s, Coward wrote a succession of popular hit plays.<ref>Lahr, John, ''Coward the Playwright''. London: Methuen 1982. {{ISBN|0-413-48050-X}}, p. 93</ref> On [[Broadway theatre|Broadway]], ''Design for Living'' was a popular and critical hit starring [[Lynn Fontanne]], [[Alfred Lunt]] and Coward, and its risqué [[Ménage à trois|ménage-à-trois]] theme made it controversial.<ref>Lesley, Cole, ''The Life of Noël Coward''. Cape 1976. {{ISBN|0-224-01288-6}}, pp. 160–61</ref><ref name=Hoare>Hoare, Philip, ''Noël Coward, A Biography''. Sinclair-Stevenson 1995. {{ISBN|1-85619-265-2}}, p. 251</ref> ''Design for Living'' was one of more than a dozen of Coward's plays made into feature films.<ref name=Hoare/>


[[Ernst Lubitsch]] initially asked [[Samson Raphaelson]] to write the screenplay, but he had no interest in adapting Coward.<ref name=TCM>[http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title.jsp?stid=72853&category=Articles Turner Classic Movies]</ref> The director then turned to [[Ben Hecht]], and they opted for a loose adaptation of Coward's plot, completely rewriting the play.<ref name=NYTimes>[https://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9A02E5DA133FE63ABC4B51DFB7678388629EDE ''New York Times'' review]</ref> In the original, the three main characters were sophisticated, urbane and cynical. Hecht changed the men's names, and the trio became naïve and exuberant, living the bohemian life worry-free in the middle of the [[Great Depression]].<ref name=SUNY/><ref name=Vineberg>Vineberg, Steve. [http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/movies/documents/01709059.htm "Re-Design: Coward’s great play, Lubitsch’s great film",] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080516174815/http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/movies/documents/01709059.htm |date=2008-05-16 }} ''Boston Phoenix'', July 2001</ref>
[[Ernst Lubitsch]] initially asked [[Samson Raphaelson]] to write the screenplay, but he had no interest in adapting Coward.<ref name=TCM>[http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title.jsp?stid=72853&category=Articles Turner Classic Movies]</ref> The director then turned to [[Ben Hecht]], and they opted for a loose adaptation of Coward's plot, completely rewriting the play.<ref name=NYTimes>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1933/11/23/archives/miriam-hopkins-fredric-march-and-gary-coper-in-a-film-version-of.html|title=Miriam Hopkins, Fredric March and Gary Cooper in a Film Version of 'Design for Living.'|first=Mordaunt|last=Hall|date=November 23, 1933|via=NYTimes.com}}</ref> In the original, the three main characters were sophisticated, urbane and cynical. Hecht changed the men's names, and the trio became naïve and exuberant, living the bohemian life worry-free in the middle of the [[Great Depression]].<ref name=SUNY/><ref name=Vineberg>Vineberg, Steve. [http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/movies/documents/01709059.htm "Re-Design: Coward's great play, Lubitsch's great film"], {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080516174815/http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/movies/documents/01709059.htm |date=May 16, 2008 }} ''Boston Phoenix'', July 2001</ref>


Lubitsch hoped to cast [[Ronald Colman]] and [[Leslie Howard (actor)|Leslie Howard]] as the male leads, but Colman demanded too much money and Howard didn't want to risk comparisons to the play's original cast. The director originally cast [[Douglas Fairbanks, Jr.]] as George, but the actor contracted [[pneumonia]] and had to withdraw just before filming began,<ref name="TCM" /> and he was replaced by [[Gary Cooper]]. Lubitsch cast [[Paramount Pictures|Paramount]] contract player [[Fredric March]] as Tom. According to the New York State Writers Institute website, a highlight of the film is the scene where, while struggling at his playwriting, he begs [[Miriam Hopkins]], as Gilda, to smack him between the shoulder blades.<ref name=SUNY/> Gilda was a role well-tailored for Hopkins' talents.<ref>Kuersten, Erich. [http://brightlightsfilm.blogspot.com/2008/03/miriam-hopkins-pre-code-menage-trois.html "Miriam Hopkins & the Pre-Code Menage-a-trois",] ''Bright Lights After Dark'', March 09, 2008</ref> Comic [[character actor]]s [[Edward Everett Horton]] and [[Franklin Pangborn]] completed the principal cast.<ref name=SUNY/>
Lubitsch hoped to cast [[Ronald Colman]] and [[Leslie Howard (actor)|Leslie Howard]] as the male leads, but Colman demanded too much money and Howard didn't want to risk comparisons to the play's original cast. The director originally cast [[Douglas Fairbanks, Jr.]] as George, but the actor contracted [[pneumonia]] and had to withdraw just before filming began,<ref name="TCM" /> and he was replaced by [[Gary Cooper]]. Lubitsch cast [[Paramount Pictures|Paramount]] contract player [[Fredric March]] as Tom. According to the New York State Writers Institute website, a highlight of the film is the scene where, while struggling at his playwriting, he begs [[Miriam Hopkins]], as Gilda, to smack him between the shoulder blades.<ref name=SUNY/> Gilda was a role well-tailored for Hopkins' talents.<ref>Kuersten, Erich. [http://brightlightsfilm.blogspot.com/2008/03/miriam-hopkins-pre-code-menage-trois.html "Miriam Hopkins & the Pre-Code Menage-a-trois"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110708025914/http://brightlightsfilm.blogspot.com/2008/03/miriam-hopkins-pre-code-menage-trois.html |date=July 8, 2011 }}, ''Bright Lights After Dark'', March 9, 2008</ref> Comic [[character actor]]s [[Edward Everett Horton]] and [[Franklin Pangborn]] completed the principal cast.<ref name=SUNY/>


Before officials began enforcing the [[Hays Code|Production Code]] in 1934, leading to censorship of sexuality from films, Paramount and other studios produced many with sexual or controversial content, including films starring [[Mae West]], [[W. C. Fields]] and [[Marlene Dietrich]] and the fantasy films of [[Josef von Sternberg]]. From 1929 to 1934, Lubitsch "made Paramount the ''nec plus ultra'' of sophisticated sexiness,"<ref name=SUNY>[http://www.albany.edu/writers-inst/webpages4/filmnotes/fnf05n10.html Analysis of the film] at New York State Writers Institute website, State University of New York</ref> joyously weaving adult sexuality, cosmopolitan flair and a disdain for convention into his films, which included ''[[The Love Parade]]'', ''[[Monte Carlo (1930 film)|Monte Carlo]]'', ''[[Trouble in Paradise (1932 film)|Trouble in Paradise]]'', ''[[The Smiling Lieutenant]]'', and ''[[One Hour with You]]''.<ref name=SUNY/> Censorship difficulties arose with ''Design for Living'' due to sexual discussions and innuendos in the film.<ref>[http://www.lubitsch.com/designrev.html ''Design for Living'' at the ''TV Guide'' movie database]</ref> The [[Hays Office]] eventually approved it for release, but the film later was banned by the [[Legion of Decency]], and in 1934 it was refused a certificate by the PCA for re-release under the strict new rules.<ref>[https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0023940/trivia Information from the Internet Movie Database]</ref> The film's risqué subject matter also attracted press notice.
Before officials began enforcing the [[Hays Code|Production Code]] in 1934, leading to censorship of sexuality from films, Paramount and other studios produced many with sexual or controversial content, including films starring [[Mae West]], [[W. C. Fields]] and [[Marlene Dietrich]] and the fantasy films of [[Josef von Sternberg]]. From 1929 to 1934, Lubitsch "made Paramount the ''ne plus ultra'' of sophisticated sexiness,"<ref name=SUNY>[http://www.albany.edu/writers-inst/webpages4/filmnotes/fnf05n10.html Analysis of the film] at New York State Writers Institute website, State University of New York</ref> joyously weaving adult sexuality, cosmopolitan flair and a disdain for convention into his films, which included ''[[The Love Parade]]'', ''[[Monte Carlo (1930 film)|Monte Carlo]]'', ''[[Trouble in Paradise (1932 film)|Trouble in Paradise]]'', ''[[The Smiling Lieutenant]]'', and ''[[One Hour with You]]''.<ref name=SUNY/> Censorship difficulties arose with ''Design for Living'' due to sexual discussions and innuendos in the film.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.lubitsch.com/designrev.html|title=''Design for Living'' at the ''TV Guide'' movie database|access-date=March 26, 2009|archive-date=July 4, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080704080657/http://www.lubitsch.com/designrev.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> The [[Hays Office]] eventually approved it for release, but the film later was banned by the [[Legion of Decency]], and in 1934 it was refused a certificate by the PCA for re-release under the strict new rules.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0023940/trivia|title=Design for Living (1933) - IMDb|via=www.imdb.com}}</ref> The film's risqué subject matter also attracted press notice.


[[File:Design for Living film still.jpg|thumb|right|Fredric March, Gary Cooper and Miriam Hopkins in a publicity still for the film]]
==Reception==
===Box office===
The film was a box office disappointment for Paramount.<ref>By, D. W. (1934, Nov 25). TAKING A LOOK AT THE RECORD. New York Times (1923-Current File) Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.sl.nsw.gov.au/docview/101193306?accountid=13902{{Dead link|date=July 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>


===Critical reception===
===Production credits===
[[Mordaunt Hall]] of ''[[The New York Times]]'' said the film "may be only a skeleton of the parent work, but it has the same familiar rattle.... Notwithstanding the fact that Mr. Coward's clever lines were tossed to the four winds and that the whole action of the story is materially changed, Mr. Lubitsch, who knows his motion picture as few others do, has in this offering... fashioned a most entertaining and highly sophisticated subject, wherein his own sly humor is constantly in evidence. He has been ably aided and abetted by Mr. Hecht in this slaughter of the Coward play, and, if the original was sharper and brisker than the picture, the latter is filled with clever fun and the story, still with a decided Parisian flair, moves along swiftly and surely."<ref name="NYTimes" />


* [[Ernst Lubitsch]] – director
''[[Time Out London]]'' observed, "Noël Coward's teacup wit and elegance hardly suits the beer glass temperament of his screen adapter Ben Hecht.... The script galumphs when it should glide, and neither the director nor the stellar cast can bring this would-be soufflé about a bohemian ménage-à-trois... to the right fluffy consistency."<ref>[http://www.timeout.com/film/reviews/65308/design-for-living.html ''Time Out London'' review]</ref>
* [[Noël Coward]] – underlying story
* [[Ben Hecht]] – screenplay
* [[Victor Milner]] – photography
* [[Ernst Fegté]] – art director (uncredited)<ref name=ADIC>{{cite book|title=Art Directors in Cinema: A Worldwide Biographical Dictionary|author=Michael L. Stephens|publisher=McFarland|year=1998|pages=101–103}}</ref>


==Critical reception==
==Accolades==
[[Mordaunt Hall]] of ''[[The New York Times]]'' said the film "may be only a skeleton of the parent work, but it has the same familiar rattle.... Notwithstanding the fact that Mr. Coward's clever lines were tossed to the four winds and that the whole action of the story is materially changed, Mr. Lubitsch, who knows his motion picture as few others do, has in this offering... fashioned a most entertaining and highly sophisticated subject, wherein his own sly humor is constantly in evidence. He has been ably aided and abetted by Mr. Hecht in this slaughter of the Coward play, and, if the original was sharper and brisker than the picture, the latter is filled with clever fun and the story, still with a decided Parisian flair, moves along swiftly and surely."<ref name="NYTimes" />
The film is recognized by [[American Film Institute]] in these lists:
* 2002: [[AFI's 100 Years...100 Passions]] – Nominated<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.afi.com/Docs/100Years/passions400.pdf |title=AFI's 100 Years...100 Passions Nominees |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=2016-08-18}}</ref>
* 2008: [[AFI's 10 Top 10]]:
** Nominated Romantic Comedy Film<ref>{{cite web|url=http://connect.afi.com/site/DocServer/10top10.pdf?docID=381&AddInterest=1781 |title=AFI's 10 Top 10 Nominees |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=2016-08-19 |deadurl=bot: unknown |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110716071937/http://connect.afi.com/site/DocServer/10top10.pdf?docID=381&AddInterest=1781 |archivedate=2011-07-16 |df= }}</ref>


''[[Time Out London]]'' observed, "Noël Coward's teacup wit and elegance hardly suits the beer glass temperament of his screen adapter Ben Hecht.... The script galumphs when it should glide, and neither the director nor the stellar cast can bring this would-be soufflé about a bohemian ménage-à-trois... to the right fluffy consistency."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.timeout.com/movies/design-for-living|title=Design for Living|website=Time Out Worldwide}}</ref>
==DVD releases==

The film was released on DVD on May 31, 2005 as part of ''The Gary Cooper Collection'', which also includes ''[[The Lives of a Bengal Lancer (film)|The Lives of a Bengal Lancer]]'', ''[[Peter Ibbetson]]'', ''[[The General Died at Dawn]]'', and ''[[Beau Geste (1939 film)|Beau Geste]]''. It was later released on both DVD and Blu-ray by [[The Criterion Collection]] on December 6, 2011, with several extras, unlike ''The Gary Cooper Collection''.
The film has been well-regarded by posterity. Reviewing the film on the occasion of its 2011 Blu-Ray release, Joseph Jon Lanthier of ''[[Slant Magazine]]'' gave it four and a half stars out of five and noted that: "Due to the uncommonly risqué, if comically clunky, plot points (...), ''Design for Living'' is often considered minor Lubitsch and major pre-Code—but it's more accurately major Ben Hecht."<ref name="slant">{{cite web|url=https://www.slantmagazine.com/dvd/design-for-living/|title=Blu-ray Review: Ernst Lubitsch's Design for Living on the Criterion Collection|first=Joseph Jon|last=Lanthier|work=[[Slant Magazine]]|date=December 5, 2011|accessdate=July 23, 2023}}</ref> Louis Chilton of ''[[The Independent (UK)|The Independent]]'' writing in 2023, "Witty, humane and [[Progressivism|progressive]], ''Design for Living'' has aged shockingly well, and arguably remains the [[wikt:Urtext|urtext]] for exploring [[throuples]] on film."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/throuples-movies-tv-polyamory-b2282717.html|title=Throuples on film! 9 times movies and TV depicted 'triad' relationships|date=February 15, 2023|website=The Independent}}</ref> Similarly, Toussaint Egan and Pete Volk wrote on [[Polygon (website)|''Polygon'']] in 2022 that ''Design for Living'' was one of the best [[pre-Code]] films, calling it a "clever comedy with charismatic and attractive movie stars in the leading roles […] a romp of a time from one of the all-time great directors."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.polygon.com/what-to-watch/2022/5/28/23132375/best-movies-netflix-amazon-hulu-hbo-leaving-may-2022|title=16 great movies leaving Netflix, Hulu, and HBO Max at the end of May 2022|first1=Toussaint|last1=Egan|first2=Pete|last2=Volk|website=[[Polygon (website)|Polygon]] |date=May 28, 2022}}</ref>

==Home media==
The film was released on DVD on May 31, 2005, as part of ''The Gary Cooper Collection'', which also includes ''[[The Lives of a Bengal Lancer (film)|The Lives of a Bengal Lancer]]'', ''[[Peter Ibbetson]]'', ''[[The General Died at Dawn]]'', and ''[[Beau Geste (1939 film)|Beau Geste]]''. It was later released on both DVD and Blu-ray by [[The Criterion Collection]] on December 6, 2011, containing several extras, unlike ''The Gary Cooper Collection''.

==See also==
* [[National Recovery Administration]] (NRA), the logo displayed at start of film


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}
;Citations
{{reflist}}


;Further reading
===Further reading===
{{refbegin}}
{{refbegin}}
* Dickens, Homer. ''The Films of Gary Cooper''. Secaucus, New Jersey: The Citadel Press, 1971 {{ISBN|0-8065-0010-7}}.
* {{cite book |last=Dickens |first=Homer |title=The Films of Gary Cooper |location=Secaucus, New Jersey |publisher=[[Citadel Press]] |year=1971 |isbn=0-8065-0010-7}}
{{refend}}
{{refend}}


==External links==
==External links==
* {{IMDb title|0023940}}
* {{IMDb title|0023940}}
* {{tcmdb title|72853}}
* {{TCMDb title|72853}}
* {{Amg movie|89216}}
* {{AllMovie title|89216}}
* {{AFI film|7592}}
*[http://www.criterion.com/current/posts/2084-design-for-living-it-takes-three ''Design for Living: It Takes Three''] an essay by Kim Morgan at the [[Criterion Collection]]
* [https://www.criterion.com/current/posts/2084-design-for-living-it-takes-three ''Design for Living: It Takes Three''], an essay by Kim Morgan at the [[Criterion Collection]]


{{Ernst Lubitsch}}
{{Ernst Lubitsch}}
{{Ben Hecht}}
{{Ben Hecht}}
{{Noël Coward musicals}}

[[Category:1933 films]]
[[Category:1933 films]]
[[Category:1930s comedy films]]
[[Category:1933 comedy films]]
[[Category:American films]]
[[Category:American black-and-white films]]
[[Category:American comedy films]]
[[Category:American films based on plays]]
[[Category:American films based on plays]]
[[Category:Films set in Paris]]
[[Category:Films set in Paris]]
[[Category:Films set in New York City]]
[[Category:Films set in New York City]]
[[Category:American black-and-white films]]
[[Category:Films directed by Ernst Lubitsch]]
[[Category:Films directed by Ernst Lubitsch]]
[[Category:Paramount Pictures films]]
[[Category:Paramount Pictures films]]
[[Category:Films made before the MPAA Production Code]]
[[Category:Films with screenplays by Ben Hecht]]
[[Category:Screenplays by Ben Hecht]]
[[Category:1930s American films]]
[[Category:American comedy films]]
[[Category:1930s English-language films]]

Revision as of 04:01, 10 October 2024

Design for Living
Theatrical release poster
Directed byErnst Lubitsch
Screenplay byBen Hecht
Based onDesign for Living
by Noël Coward
Produced byErnst Lubitsch
Starring
CinematographyVictor Milner
Edited byFrances Marsh
Production
company
Distributed byParamount Pictures
Release date
  • December 29, 1933 (1933-12-29) (United States)
Running time
91 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish

Design for Living is a 1933 American pre-Code romantic comedy film directed by Ernst Lubitsch from a screenplay by Ben Hecht, based on the 1932 play of the same name by Noël Coward. Starring Fredric March, Gary Cooper, and Miriam Hopkins, the film is about a woman who cannot decide between two men who love her, and the trio agree to try living together in a platonic friendly relationship.

Criticism was mixed, with some critics praising the film, but many were ambivalent about its great departure from Coward's play. Coward said, "I'm told that there are three of my original lines left in the film—such original ones as 'Pass the mustard'."[1] The film was a box office success,[2] ranking as one of the top ten highest-grossing films of 1933. All three of the lead actors—March, Cooper, and Hopkins—received attention from this film as they were all at the peak of their careers.

Plot

While en route to Paris via train, commercial artist Gilda Farrell meets artist George Curtis and playwright Thomas Chambers, fellow Americans who share an apartment in the French capital. Gilda works for advertising executive Max Plunkett, who has had no success in his efforts to engage her in a romantic relationship. Tom and George each realize the other is in love with Gilda, and although they agree to forget her, they cannot resist her when she comes to visit. Unable to choose between the two, she proposes she live with them as a friend, muse, and critic—with the understanding they will not have sex.

Gilda arranges for a producer to read Tom's play and he goes to London to oversee the staging of his work. During his absence, Gilda and George become involved romantically and sexually, much to Tom's chagrin. Months later, Tom bumps into Max at the theatre. Max tells him that George has become highly successful as a portrait artist. Tom returns to Paris and discovers George has vacated their apartment and moved into a penthouse with Gilda. With George in Nice painting a portrait, Gilda and Tom rekindle their affair.

George returns and, realizing his former roommate and current lover have been trysting while he was away, orders the two to get out. Gilda decides to end the men's rivalry by marrying Max in Manhattan, but she is so upset when she receives potted plants from her former beaux that she cannot consummate the marriage. When Max hosts a party for his advertising clients, Tom and George crash the event and hide in Gilda's bedroom. Max finds the three laughing on the bed and orders the men out; a brawl ensues, prompting all the guests to depart. Gilda announces she is leaving her husband, and she, Tom, and George decide to return to Paris and their unusual living arrangement.

Cast

Production

In the late 1920s and early 1930s, Coward wrote a succession of popular hit plays.[3] On Broadway, Design for Living was a popular and critical hit starring Lynn Fontanne, Alfred Lunt and Coward, and its risqué ménage-à-trois theme made it controversial.[4][5] Design for Living was one of more than a dozen of Coward's plays made into feature films.[5]

Ernst Lubitsch initially asked Samson Raphaelson to write the screenplay, but he had no interest in adapting Coward.[6] The director then turned to Ben Hecht, and they opted for a loose adaptation of Coward's plot, completely rewriting the play.[7] In the original, the three main characters were sophisticated, urbane and cynical. Hecht changed the men's names, and the trio became naïve and exuberant, living the bohemian life worry-free in the middle of the Great Depression.[8][9]

Lubitsch hoped to cast Ronald Colman and Leslie Howard as the male leads, but Colman demanded too much money and Howard didn't want to risk comparisons to the play's original cast. The director originally cast Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. as George, but the actor contracted pneumonia and had to withdraw just before filming began,[6] and he was replaced by Gary Cooper. Lubitsch cast Paramount contract player Fredric March as Tom. According to the New York State Writers Institute website, a highlight of the film is the scene where, while struggling at his playwriting, he begs Miriam Hopkins, as Gilda, to smack him between the shoulder blades.[8] Gilda was a role well-tailored for Hopkins' talents.[10] Comic character actors Edward Everett Horton and Franklin Pangborn completed the principal cast.[8]

Before officials began enforcing the Production Code in 1934, leading to censorship of sexuality from films, Paramount and other studios produced many with sexual or controversial content, including films starring Mae West, W. C. Fields and Marlene Dietrich and the fantasy films of Josef von Sternberg. From 1929 to 1934, Lubitsch "made Paramount the ne plus ultra of sophisticated sexiness,"[8] joyously weaving adult sexuality, cosmopolitan flair and a disdain for convention into his films, which included The Love Parade, Monte Carlo, Trouble in Paradise, The Smiling Lieutenant, and One Hour with You.[8] Censorship difficulties arose with Design for Living due to sexual discussions and innuendos in the film.[11] The Hays Office eventually approved it for release, but the film later was banned by the Legion of Decency, and in 1934 it was refused a certificate by the PCA for re-release under the strict new rules.[12] The film's risqué subject matter also attracted press notice.

Fredric March, Gary Cooper and Miriam Hopkins in a publicity still for the film

Production credits

Critical reception

Mordaunt Hall of The New York Times said the film "may be only a skeleton of the parent work, but it has the same familiar rattle.... Notwithstanding the fact that Mr. Coward's clever lines were tossed to the four winds and that the whole action of the story is materially changed, Mr. Lubitsch, who knows his motion picture as few others do, has in this offering... fashioned a most entertaining and highly sophisticated subject, wherein his own sly humor is constantly in evidence. He has been ably aided and abetted by Mr. Hecht in this slaughter of the Coward play, and, if the original was sharper and brisker than the picture, the latter is filled with clever fun and the story, still with a decided Parisian flair, moves along swiftly and surely."[7]

Time Out London observed, "Noël Coward's teacup wit and elegance hardly suits the beer glass temperament of his screen adapter Ben Hecht.... The script galumphs when it should glide, and neither the director nor the stellar cast can bring this would-be soufflé about a bohemian ménage-à-trois... to the right fluffy consistency."[14]

The film has been well-regarded by posterity. Reviewing the film on the occasion of its 2011 Blu-Ray release, Joseph Jon Lanthier of Slant Magazine gave it four and a half stars out of five and noted that: "Due to the uncommonly risqué, if comically clunky, plot points (...), Design for Living is often considered minor Lubitsch and major pre-Code—but it's more accurately major Ben Hecht."[15] Louis Chilton of The Independent writing in 2023, "Witty, humane and progressive, Design for Living has aged shockingly well, and arguably remains the urtext for exploring throuples on film."[16] Similarly, Toussaint Egan and Pete Volk wrote on Polygon in 2022 that Design for Living was one of the best pre-Code films, calling it a "clever comedy with charismatic and attractive movie stars in the leading roles […] a romp of a time from one of the all-time great directors."[17]

Home media

The film was released on DVD on May 31, 2005, as part of The Gary Cooper Collection, which also includes The Lives of a Bengal Lancer, Peter Ibbetson, The General Died at Dawn, and Beau Geste. It was later released on both DVD and Blu-ray by The Criterion Collection on December 6, 2011, containing several extras, unlike The Gary Cooper Collection.

See also

References

  1. ^ Richards, Dick. The Wit of Noël Coward. Sphere Books, 1970, p. 86.
  2. ^ DOUGLAS W. CHURCHILL (December 30, 1934). "THE YEAR IN HOLLYWOOD: 1984 May Be Remembered as the Beginning of the Sweetness-and-Light Era". New York Times. p. X5.
  3. ^ Lahr, John, Coward the Playwright. London: Methuen 1982. ISBN 0-413-48050-X, p. 93
  4. ^ Lesley, Cole, The Life of Noël Coward. Cape 1976. ISBN 0-224-01288-6, pp. 160–61
  5. ^ a b Hoare, Philip, Noël Coward, A Biography. Sinclair-Stevenson 1995. ISBN 1-85619-265-2, p. 251
  6. ^ a b Turner Classic Movies
  7. ^ a b Hall, Mordaunt (November 23, 1933). "Miriam Hopkins, Fredric March and Gary Cooper in a Film Version of 'Design for Living.'" – via NYTimes.com.
  8. ^ a b c d e Analysis of the film at New York State Writers Institute website, State University of New York
  9. ^ Vineberg, Steve. "Re-Design: Coward's great play, Lubitsch's great film", Archived May 16, 2008, at the Wayback Machine Boston Phoenix, July 2001
  10. ^ Kuersten, Erich. "Miriam Hopkins & the Pre-Code Menage-a-trois" Archived July 8, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, Bright Lights After Dark, March 9, 2008
  11. ^ "Design for Living at the TV Guide movie database". Archived from the original on July 4, 2008. Retrieved March 26, 2009.
  12. ^ "Design for Living (1933) - IMDb" – via www.imdb.com.
  13. ^ Michael L. Stephens (1998). Art Directors in Cinema: A Worldwide Biographical Dictionary. McFarland. pp. 101–103.
  14. ^ "Design for Living". Time Out Worldwide.
  15. ^ Lanthier, Joseph Jon (December 5, 2011). "Blu-ray Review: Ernst Lubitsch's Design for Living on the Criterion Collection". Slant Magazine. Retrieved July 23, 2023.
  16. ^ "Throuples on film! 9 times movies and TV depicted 'triad' relationships". The Independent. February 15, 2023.
  17. ^ Egan, Toussaint; Volk, Pete (May 28, 2022). "16 great movies leaving Netflix, Hulu, and HBO Max at the end of May 2022". Polygon.

Further reading