USS Independence (LCS-2): Difference between revisions
Thewolfchild (talk | contribs) |
update template syntax |
||
(29 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2021}} |
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2021}} |
||
{|{{Infobox ship begin |
{|{{Infobox ship begin |
||
⚫ | |||
}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
| Ship image = USS Independence LCS-2 at pierce (cropped).jpg |
| Ship image = USS Independence LCS-2 at pierce (cropped).jpg |
||
| Ship caption = USS ''Independence'' at [[Key West]] on 29 March 2010 |
| Ship caption = USS ''Independence'' at [[Key West]] on 29 March 2010 |
||
⚫ | |||
}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
| Hide header = |
| Hide header = |
||
| Ship country = United States |
| Ship country = United States |
||
Line 22: | Line 20: | ||
| Ship christened = 4 October 2008 |
| Ship christened = 4 October 2008 |
||
| Ship acquired = |
| Ship acquired = |
||
| Ship commissioned = 16 January 2010<ref name="Reuters1-16">{{cite news|title=US Navy commissions newest warship, others coming|first=Andrea|last=Shalal-Esa|date=16 January 2009| |
| Ship commissioned = 16 January 2010<ref name="Reuters1-16">{{cite news|title=US Navy commissions newest warship, others coming|first=Andrea|last=Shalal-Esa|date=16 January 2009|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1614889220100116|access-date=14 March 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100531075009/http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1614889220100116|archive-date=31 May 2010|url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
| Ship decommissioned = 29 July 2021<ref name="distinguished"/> |
| Ship decommissioned = 29 July 2021<ref name="distinguished"/> |
||
| Ship homeport = [[Naval Base San Diego|San Diego]]<ref name="NVR"/> |
| Ship homeport = [[Naval Base San Diego|San Diego]]<ref name="NVR"/> |
||
Line 36: | Line 34: | ||
*(Independence Through Bold Action) |
*(Independence Through Bold Action) |
||
| Ship badge = [[File:USS Independence LCS2 COA.png|150px]] |
| Ship badge = [[File:USS Independence LCS2 COA.png|150px]] |
||
⚫ | |||
}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
| Hide header = |
| Hide header = |
||
| Header caption = |
| Header caption = |
||
| Ship class = {{sclass|Independence|littoral combat ship}} |
| Ship class = {{sclass|Independence|littoral combat ship}} |
||
| Ship displacement = |
|||
| Ship displacement = 2,307 metric tons light, 3,104 metric tons full, 797 metric tons deadweight<ref name="NVR"/> |
|||
* {{cvt|2307|MT|LT|order=flip|abbr=on}} light |
|||
* {{cvt|3104|MT|LT|order=flip}} full |
|||
* {{cvt|797|MT|LT|order=flip}} deadweight<ref name="NVR"/> |
|||
| Ship length = {{convert|128.4|m|ft|0|abbr=on}}<ref name="NVR"/> |
| Ship length = {{convert|128.4|m|ft|0|abbr=on}}<ref name="NVR"/> |
||
| Ship beam = {{convert|31.6|m|ft|0|abbr=on}}<ref name="NVR"/> |
| Ship beam = {{convert|31.6|m|ft|0|abbr=on}}<ref name="NVR"/> |
||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
|} |
|} |
||
'''USS ''Independence'' (LCS-2 |
'''USS ''Independence''''' ('''LCS-2''') is the [[lead ship]] of the {{sclass|Independence|littoral combat ship|0}} of [[littoral combat ship]]s. She is the sixth ship of the [[United States Navy]] to be named for the concept of [[independence]]. The design was produced by the [[General Dynamics]] consortium for the Navy's LCS program, and competes with the [[Lockheed Martin]]–designed [[Freedom-class littoral combat ship|''Freedom'' variant]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=4200&tid=1650&ct=4|title=US Navy Fact File: Littoral Combat Ship Class – LCS|publisher=US Navy|access-date=14 March 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150302070526/http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=4200&tid=1650&ct=4|archive-date=2 March 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
''Independence'', delivered to the Navy at the end of 2009, |
''Independence'', delivered to the Navy at the end of 2009, was a high-speed, small-crew [[corvette]], although the U.S. Navy does not use the term, intended to operate [[littoral]] waters. She can swap out various systems to take on various missions, including finding and destroying mines, hunting submarines in and near shallow water, and fighting small boats (she is not intended to fight warships). The ship is a [[trimaran]] design with a wide beam above the waterline that supports a larger [[flight deck]] than those of the Navy's much larger destroyers and cruisers, as well as a large hangar and a similarly large mission bay below. The trimaran hull also exhibits low [[hydrodynamic]] drag, allowing efficient operation on two diesel-powered water jets at speeds up to {{convert|18|kn}}, and high-speed operation on two gas turbine–powered water jets at a sustainable {{convert|44|kn}} and even faster for short periods. |
||
On 29 July 2021, the Navy decommissioned ''Independence'' during a private ceremony at Naval Base San Diego, |
On 29 July 2021, the Navy decommissioned ''Independence'' during a private ceremony at [[Naval Base San Diego]], California.<ref name="distinguished"/> |
||
==Description== |
==Description== |
||
[[File:US Navy 100329-N-1481K-293 USS Independence (LCS 2) arrives at Mole Pier at Naval Air Station Key West.jpg|thumb|Helicopter facilities and the mission bay dominate the stern of the ''Independence'' class |
[[File:US Navy 100329-N-1481K-293 USS Independence (LCS 2) arrives at Mole Pier at Naval Air Station Key West.jpg|thumb|Helicopter facilities and the mission bay dominate the stern of the ''Independence'' class.]]The design for ''Independence'' is based on a high-speed trimaran (''[[Benchijigua Express]]'') hull built by [[Austal]] (Henderson, Australia). The {{convert|418|ft|adj=on}} surface combatant design requires a crew of 43 sailors. |
||
With {{convert|11000|m3}} of payload volume, she was designed to carry two mission modules, allowing the ship to do multiple missions without having to be refitted. The flight deck, {{convert|1030|m2|sqft|abbr=on}}, can support two [[SH-60]] Seahawk helicopters, multiple |
With {{convert|11000|m3|sp=us}} of payload volume, she was designed to carry two mission modules, allowing the ship to do multiple missions without having to be refitted. The flight deck, at {{convert|1030|m2|sqft|abbr=on}}, can support two [[SH-60]] Seahawk helicopters, multiple [[unmanned aerial vehicle]]s, or one [[CH-53]] Sea Stallion-class helicopter. The trimaran aluminum hull will allow flight operations up to [[sea state]] 5.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ussindependenceship.org/overview_ship.php|title=USS Independence LCS 2 – General Info|publisher=ussindependence.org|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100402233202/http://ussindependenceship.org/overview_ship.php|archive-date=2 April 2010}}</ref> |
||
''Independence'' carries a default armament for self-defense |
''Independence'' carries a default armament for self-defense. Unlike traditional combatants with fixed armament such as guns and missiles, tailored mission modules can be configured for one mission package at a time. Modules may consist of manned aircraft, unmanned vehicles, offboard sensors, or mission manning detachments. |
||
The interior volume and payload is greater than some destroyers, allowing the ship to serve as a high |
The interior volume and payload is greater than some destroyers, allowing the ship to serve as a high-speed transport-and-maneuver platform. The {{convert|15200|sqft|m2|-1|adj=on}} mission bay takes up most of the deck below the hangar and flight deck. Packages the size of a {{convert|20|ft|m|adj=mid|-long}} [[Intermodal container|shipping container]] can be airlifted onto the deck at sea, then moved by an elevator into the mission bay. |
||
In addition to cargo or container |
In addition to cargo or container-sized mission modules, the bay can carry four lanes of multiple [[Stryker (vehicle)|Strykers]], armored [[Humvee]]s, and their associated troops. A side ramp allows vehicle [[roll-on/roll-off]] loading to a dock and would have allowed the ship to transport the cancelled [[Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gdlcs.com/sites/default/files/LCS_brochure_1-09.pdf|title=General Dynamics Littoral Combat Ship brochure|publisher=gdlcs.com}}{{dead link|date=March 2015}}</ref> |
||
Bunks and living spaces are below the bridge. The helm is controlled by joysticks instead of a traditional steering wheel.<ref>{{cite web |last=Cavas |first=Christopher P. |url=http://militarytimes.com/news/2010/01/navy_insidelook_lcs2_011110w/ |title=LCS 2 features large hangar, bigger berths |work=[[Military Times]] |date=11 January 2010 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131002150901/http://www.militarytimes.com/news/2010/01/navy_insidelook_lcs2_011110w/ |archive-date=2 October 2013 |url-status=live }}{{subscription required}}</ref> |
Bunks and living spaces are below the bridge. The helm is controlled by joysticks instead of a traditional steering wheel.<ref>{{cite web |last=Cavas |first=Christopher P. |url=http://militarytimes.com/news/2010/01/navy_insidelook_lcs2_011110w/ |title=LCS 2 features large hangar, bigger berths |work=[[Military Times]] |date=11 January 2010 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131002150901/http://www.militarytimes.com/news/2010/01/navy_insidelook_lcs2_011110w/ |archive-date=2 October 2013 |url-status=live }}{{subscription required}}</ref> |
||
Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
Northrop Grumman has demonstrated sensor fusion of on and off board systems in the Integrated Combat Management System (ICMS) used on ''Independence''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=171665 |title=Northrop Grumman-Led Team Demonstrates Means to Effectively Enhance Littoral Warfighting Capabilities |work=NASDAQ Global Newswire |date=18 August 2009 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120220053646/http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=171665 |archive-date=20 February 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
Northrop Grumman has demonstrated sensor fusion of on and off board systems in the Integrated Combat Management System (ICMS) used on ''Independence''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=171665 |title=Northrop Grumman-Led Team Demonstrates Means to Effectively Enhance Littoral Warfighting Capabilities |work=NASDAQ Global Newswire |date=18 August 2009 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120220053646/http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=171665 |archive-date=20 February 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
''Independence'' has an Interior Communications Center that can be curtained off from the rest |
Instead of the heavily protected [[Combat Information Center]] found on other Navy warships, ''Independence'' has an Interior Communications Center that can be curtained off from the rest of the bridge.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.navytimes.com/news/2010/04/defense_navy_independence_041210w/ |title=LCS 2: 'It'll blow your mind' |last=Cavas |first=Christopher P. |work=NavyTimes |date=12 April 2010 |access-date=14 March 2015}} {{subscription required}}</ref> |
||
Austal claims that ''Independence'' will use one-third less fuel than ''Freedom'', but the [[Congressional Budget Office]] found that fuel would account for 18 percent or less of the total lifetime cost of ''Freedom''. While it was unable to judge the fuel usage of ''Independence'', the higher purchase price of ''Independence'' would dominate her lifetime costs.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://blog.al.com/live/2010/05/navy_not_looking_at_fuel_effic.html |title=Navy not using fuel cost data in LCS competition |publisher=AL.com |last=Reilly |first=Sean |date=7 May 2010 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120308023823/http://blog.al.com/live/2010/05/navy_not_looking_at_fuel_effic.html |archive-date=8 March 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
Austal claims that ''Independence'' will use one-third less fuel than ''Freedom'', but the [[Congressional Budget Office]] found that fuel would account for 18 percent or less of the total lifetime cost of ''Freedom''. While it was unable to judge the fuel usage of ''Independence'', the higher purchase price of ''Independence'' would dominate her lifetime costs.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://blog.al.com/live/2010/05/navy_not_looking_at_fuel_effic.html |title=Navy not using fuel cost data in LCS competition |publisher=AL.com |last=Reilly |first=Sean |date=7 May 2010 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120308023823/http://blog.al.com/live/2010/05/navy_not_looking_at_fuel_effic.html |archive-date=8 March 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
==History== |
==History== |
||
The contract was awarded to [[General Dynamics]] in July 2003.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.generaldynamics.com/news/press_releases/2003/July17,%202003%20News%20Release-3.htm |title=General Dynamics Bath Iron Works Team Wins Preliminary Design Award for U.S. Navy's Littoral Combat Ship |publisher=General Dynamics (Press release) |date=17 July 2003 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928004658/http://www.generaldynamics.com/news/press_releases/2003/July17%2C%202003%20News%20Release-3.htm |archive-date=28 September 2007 }}</ref> The contract to build her was then awarded to Austal USA of [[Mobile, Alabama]], on 14 October 2005 and her keel was laid down on 19 January 2006. Delivery to the United States Navy was scheduled for December 2008.[[File:USS Independence LCS-2.jpg|thumb |
The contract was awarded to [[General Dynamics]] in July 2003.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.generaldynamics.com/news/press_releases/2003/July17,%202003%20News%20Release-3.htm |title=General Dynamics Bath Iron Works Team Wins Preliminary Design Award for U.S. Navy's Littoral Combat Ship |publisher=General Dynamics (Press release) |date=17 July 2003 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928004658/http://www.generaldynamics.com/news/press_releases/2003/July17%2C%202003%20News%20Release-3.htm |archive-date=28 September 2007 }}</ref> The contract to build her was then awarded to Austal USA of [[Mobile, Alabama]], on 14 October 2005 and her keel was laid down on 19 January 2006. Delivery to the United States Navy was scheduled for December 2008.[[File:USS Independence LCS-2.jpg|thumb|Side view of ''Independence'' on 29 April 2008]] |
||
The originally planned second General Dynamics ship (LCS-4) was canceled on 1 November 2007.<ref>{{cite press release |title=Navy Terminates Littoral Combat Ship (LCS 4) Contract |number=1269–07 |date=1 November 2007 |publisher=US Department of Defense |url=http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=11449 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071104071146/http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=11449 |archive-date=4 November 2007 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
The originally planned second General Dynamics ship (LCS-4) was canceled on 1 November 2007.<ref>{{cite press release |title=Navy Terminates Littoral Combat Ship (LCS 4) Contract |number=1269–07 |date=1 November 2007 |publisher=US Department of Defense |url=http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=11449 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071104071146/http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=11449 |archive-date=4 November 2007 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
On 1 May 2009, a second vessel was reordered by the Navy, {{USS|Coronado|LCS-4|6}}. The keel was laid on 17 December 2009,<ref name="prnewswire.com">{{cite press release |url=http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/general-dynamics-littoral-combat-ship-team-delivers-independence-lcs-2-and-lays-keel-for-coronado-lcs-4-79674292.html |title=General Dynamics Littoral Combat Ship Team Delivers Independence (LCS 2) and Lays Keel for Coronado (LCS 4) |publisher=PR Newswire |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402134038/http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/general-dynamics-littoral-combat-ship-team-delivers-independence-lcs-2-and-lays-keel-for-coronado-lcs-4-79674292.html |archive-date=2 April 2015 |url-status=dead }}</ref> with delivery scheduled for May 2012.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://blog.al.com/press-register-business/2009/05/austal_to_build_second_lcs.html |title=Navy orders second LCS from Austal |last=Wilkinson |first=Kaija |publisher=AL.com |date=1 May 2009 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120303062210/http://blog.al.com/press-register-business/2009/05/austal_to_build_second_lcs.html |archive-date=3 March 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
On 1 May 2009, a second vessel was reordered by the Navy, {{USS|Coronado|LCS-4|6}}. The keel was laid on 17 December 2009,<ref name="prnewswire.com">{{cite press release |url=http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/general-dynamics-littoral-combat-ship-team-delivers-independence-lcs-2-and-lays-keel-for-coronado-lcs-4-79674292.html |title=General Dynamics Littoral Combat Ship Team Delivers Independence (LCS 2) and Lays Keel for Coronado (LCS 4) |publisher=PR Newswire |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402134038/http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/general-dynamics-littoral-combat-ship-team-delivers-independence-lcs-2-and-lays-keel-for-coronado-lcs-4-79674292.html |archive-date=2 April 2015 |url-status=dead }}</ref> with delivery scheduled for May 2012.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://blog.al.com/press-register-business/2009/05/austal_to_build_second_lcs.html |title=Navy orders second LCS from Austal |last=Wilkinson |first=Kaija |publisher=AL.com |date=1 May 2009 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120303062210/http://blog.al.com/press-register-business/2009/05/austal_to_build_second_lcs.html |archive-date=3 March 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref> The ship was delivered 27 September 2013.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://worldmaritimenews.com/archives/94378/u-s-navy-accepts-delivery-of-future-uss-coronado/ |title=Navy Accepts Delivery of USS Coronado |work=World Maritime News |date=30 September 2013 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141213020955/http://worldmaritimenews.com/archives/94378/u-s-navy-accepts-delivery-of-future-uss-coronado/ |archive-date=13 December 2014 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
For fiscal year 2010, the Navy planned a competition between Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics for the next three littoral combat ships, with the winner building two ships and the loser only one.<ref>{{cite news|title=Navy Restarting Contest for Halted Shipbuilding Program| |
For fiscal year 2010, the Navy planned a competition between Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics for the next three littoral combat ships, with the winner building two ships and the loser only one.<ref>{{cite news|title=Navy Restarting Contest for Halted Shipbuilding Program|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=3 April 2008|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/02/AR2008040203210.html|first=David|last=Sharp|agency=Associated Press|access-date=14 March 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121104180557/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/02/AR2008040203210.html|archive-date=4 November 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> ''Independence'' was christened 5 October 2008 by Doreen Scott, wife of 10th [[Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy]] [[Terry D. Scott]].<ref>Wilkinson, Kaija, "Independence's Day: Austal Warship Christened", ''[[Mobile Press-Register]]'', 5 October 2008.</ref> |
||
Navy leaders said that the fixed price competition offered the Austal design an equal shot, in spite of |
Navy leaders said that the fixed price competition offered the Austal design an equal shot, in spite of her excess size, cost and limited service.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.al.com/news/press-register/metro.ssf?/base/news/1260440129204000.xml&coll=3|title=Navy says the field is level for teams competing for LCS contract|publisher=al.com|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130117142633/http://www.al.com/news/press-register/metro.ssf?/base/news/1260440129204000.xml&coll=3|archive-date=17 January 2013}}</ref> In June 2009, the development and construction of ''Independence'' was 220% over-budget. The total projected cost for the ship was $704 million. The Navy had originally projected the cost at $220 million.<ref>{{cite web |last=Ewing |first=Philip |url=http://militarytimes.com/news/2009/06/navy_lcs2_delay_062909w/ |title=LCS 2 delays trials after engine issue |work=[[Military Times]] |date=29 June 2009 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131217233851/http://www.militarytimes.com/news/2009/06/navy_lcs2_delay_062909w/ |archive-date=17 December 2013 |url-status=live }}{{subscription required}}</ref> ''Independence'' began builder's trials near Mobile, Alabama on 2 July 2009, three days behind schedule because of maintenance issues.<ref>{{cite web |last=Ewing |first=Philip |url=http://militarytimes.com/news/2009/07/navy_lcs2_sea_trials_070209w/ |title=LCS 2 begins sea trials after 3-day delay] |work=[[Military Times]] |date=3 July 2009 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131002145349/http://www.militarytimes.com/news/2009/07/navy_lcs2_sea_trials_070209w/ |archive-date=2 October 2013 |url-status=live }}{{subscription required}}</ref> |
||
In response to problems with the propulsion plant (the port gas turbine shaft seal sprang a leak), General Dynamics rearranged builder's trials to test other systems until this was fixed.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.navytimes.com/news/2009/08/navy_lcs_indy_080309w/ |title=Turbine-seal leak means more tests for LCS 2 |work=NavyTimes |last=Ewing |first=Philip |date=4 August 2009 |access-date=14 March 2015}} {{subscription required}}</ref> The ship completed builder's trials on 21 October 2009<ref>{{cite web |last=Ewing |first=Philip |url=http://militarytimes.com/news/2009/10/navy_lcs2_trialsdone_102109w/ |title=After delays, LCS 2 completes builder trials |work=[[Military Times]] |date=21 October 2009 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131217231757/http://www.militarytimes.com/news/2009/10/navy_lcs2_trialsdone_102109w/ |archive-date=17 December 2013 |url-status=live }}{{subscription required}}</ref> and acceptance trials on 19 November 2009.<ref>{{cite web |last=Cavas |first=Christopher P. |url=http://militarytimes.com/news/2009/11/navy_DN_111909_LCStrials/ |title=Trials successful for 2nd LCS hull |work=[[Military Times]] |date=21 November 2009 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131002150904/http://www.militarytimes.com/news/2009/11/navy_DN_111909_LCStrials/ |archive-date=2 October 2013 |url-status=live }}{{subscription required}}</ref> |
In response to problems with the propulsion plant (the port gas turbine shaft seal sprang a leak), General Dynamics rearranged builder's trials to test other systems until this was fixed.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.navytimes.com/news/2009/08/navy_lcs_indy_080309w/ |title=Turbine-seal leak means more tests for LCS 2 |work=NavyTimes |last=Ewing |first=Philip |date=4 August 2009 |access-date=14 March 2015}} {{subscription required}}</ref> The ship completed builder's trials on 21 October 2009<ref>{{cite web |last=Ewing |first=Philip |url=http://militarytimes.com/news/2009/10/navy_lcs2_trialsdone_102109w/ |title=After delays, LCS 2 completes builder trials |work=[[Military Times]] |date=21 October 2009 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131217231757/http://www.militarytimes.com/news/2009/10/navy_lcs2_trialsdone_102109w/ |archive-date=17 December 2013 |url-status=live }}{{subscription required}}</ref> and acceptance trials on 19 November 2009.<ref>{{cite web |last=Cavas |first=Christopher P. |url=http://militarytimes.com/news/2009/11/navy_DN_111909_LCStrials/ |title=Trials successful for 2nd LCS hull |work=[[Military Times]] |date=21 November 2009 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131002150904/http://www.militarytimes.com/news/2009/11/navy_DN_111909_LCStrials/ |archive-date=2 October 2013 |url-status=live }}{{subscription required}}</ref> |
||
On 9 December 2009, the Navy announced that the ship had completed |
On 9 December 2009, the Navy announced that the ship had completed the first [[INSURV]] inspection. The inspection found 2,080 discrepancies, including 39 high-priority deficiencies, but concluded that all could be resolved before the Navy accepted the ship as scheduled. The ship was delivered to the Navy on 17 December 2009, and the service officially accepted her the next day.<ref name="prnewswire.com"/> However, the ship was found to be incomplete and a second round of acceptance trials was scheduled for 2011.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dote.osd.mil/pub/reports/FY2010/pdf/navy/2010lcs.pdf |title=Navy report of LCS status in 2010 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923220133/http://www.dote.osd.mil/pub/reports/FY2010/pdf/navy/2010lcs.pdf |archive-date=23 September 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
The ship was commissioned on 16 January 2010 at [[Mobile, Alabama]]<ref>{{cite press release |url=http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=50586 |title=USS Independence Commissioned |publisher=Navy News Service |id=NNS100116-31 |author=Surface Forces Public Affairs |date=16 January 2010 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151222085757/http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=50586 |archive-date=22 December 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref> and completed her maiden voyage in April 2010.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.naval-technology.com/news/news82616.html?WT.mc_id=DN_News |work=naval-technology.com |date=19 April 2010 |title=USS Independence Completes Maiden Voyage |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141111065917/http://www.naval-technology.com/news/news82616.html?WT.mc_id=DN_News |archive-date=11 November 2014 |url-status=live }}</ref>[[File:US Navy 100402-N-7653W-102 The Littoral combat ship USS Independence (LCS 2) approaches Mayport, Fla.jpg|thumb |
The ship was commissioned on 16 January 2010 at [[Mobile, Alabama]]<ref>{{cite press release |url=http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=50586 |title=USS Independence Commissioned |publisher=Navy News Service |id=NNS100116-31 |author=Surface Forces Public Affairs |date=16 January 2010 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151222085757/http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=50586 |archive-date=22 December 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref> and completed her maiden voyage in April 2010.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.naval-technology.com/news/news82616.html?WT.mc_id=DN_News |work=naval-technology.com |date=19 April 2010 |title=USS Independence Completes Maiden Voyage |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141111065917/http://www.naval-technology.com/news/news82616.html?WT.mc_id=DN_News |archive-date=11 November 2014 |url-status=live }}</ref>[[File:US Navy 100402-N-7653W-102 The Littoral combat ship USS Independence (LCS 2) approaches Mayport, Fla.jpg|thumb|Rear view of ''Independence'' approaching Mayport, Florida, on 2 April 2010]]In 2010, the Navy asked for an additional $5.3 million to correct problems found in the sea trials.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2010/07/marine_reprogramming_070810w/|title=Little changing for Corps in funding shift|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110829032913/http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2010/07/marine_reprogramming_070810w|archive-date=29 August 2011}}</ref> [[Galvanic corrosion]] caused by an aluminum hull acts as an anode in contact with the stainless steel propulsion system with sea water acting as an [[electrolyte]], and electrical currents not fully isolated, caused "aggressive corrosion."<ref name=lerman1>{{cite web |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-17/navy-finds-aggressive-corrosion-on-austal-s-combat-ship-1-.html |title=Navy Finds 'Aggressive' Corrosion on New Ship |date=17 June 2011 |last=Lerman |first=David |work=Bloomberg News |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140720061414/http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-17/navy-finds-aggressive-corrosion-on-austal-s-combat-ship-1-.html |archive-date=20 July 2014 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/06/shipbuilder-blames-navy-as-brand-new-warship-disintegrates/ |title=Builder Blames Navy as Brand-New Warship Disintegrates |last1=Axe |first1=Davis |date=23 June 2011 |work=Wired Magazine |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140329041558/http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/06/shipbuilder-blames-navy-as-brand-new-warship-disintegrates/ |archive-date=29 March 2014 |url-status=live }}</ref> Prior to the discovery of corrosion, Austal and General Dynamics had both agreed to dissolve their relationship with each other and agree to act as competitors in March.<ref name="defensenewsMarch2010">{{cite web|url=http://www.defensenews.com/article/20100304/DEFSECT03/3040310/GD-and-Austal-Split-Up-To-Bid-on-LCS |archive-url=https://archive.today/20140102225206/http://www.defensenews.com/article/20100304/DEFSECT03/3040310/GD-and-Austal-Split-Up-To-Bid-on-LCS |url-status=dead |archive-date=2 January 2014 |title=GD and Austal Split Up To Bid on LCS |last=Cavas |first=Christopher |date=4 March 2010 |publisher=DefenseNews.com |access-date=14 March 2015}}</ref> The cause of the split was due to the planned competition between Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics.<ref name="defensenewsMarch2010"/> Prior to the split, General Dynamics was to continue maintenance on the ship after she entered service.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/07/plenty-of-blame-to-go-around-for-disappearing-warship/ |last=Axe |first=David |title=Plenty of Blame to Go Around for 'Disappearing' Warship |date=5 July 2011 |work=Wired.com |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140304094004/http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/07/plenty-of-blame-to-go-around-for-disappearing-warship/ |archive-date=4 March 2014 |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2011 the corrosion problem was found to be even worse than expected and repair would require time in a drydock to completely remove the water jets.<ref name=lerman1/> In response, Austal blamed the U.S. Navy for not properly maintaining the ship.<ref>{{cite news |last=Lynch |first=Jared |url=http://www.smh.com.au/business/rust-not-our-fault-insists-austal-20110620-1gbt2.html |title=Rust not our fault, insists Austal |work=The Sydney Morning Herald |date=21 June 2011 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924151143/http://www.smh.com.au/business/rust-not-our-fault-insists-austal-20110620-1gbt2.html |archive-date=24 September 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine | url=https://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/06/shipbuilder-blames-navy-as-brand-new-warship-disintegrates/#more-49948 | magazine=Wired | first=David | last=Axe | title=Builder Blames Navy as Brand-New Warship Disintegrates | date=23 June 2011 | access-date=14 March 2015 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140329041558/http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/06/shipbuilder-blames-navy-as-brand-new-warship-disintegrates/#more-49948 | archive-date=29 March 2014 | url-status=live }}</ref> However the Navy replied that the electrical insulation had been improperly installed during construction.<ref>{{cite web |author=Ashton Carter |author-link=Ashton Carter |url=https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/229068-lcs-osd-brown-lcs-letter.html |title=Carter letter to Brown |publisher=Department of Defense |date=13 July 2011 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150222170008/https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/229068-lcs-osd-brown-lcs-letter.html |archive-date=22 February 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref> Later Austal said it had found a fix for the problem that would be tested on the third Austal LCS ship.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.marinelog.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=991:2011jun00230&catid=1:latest-news&Itemid=107|title=Austal develops corrosion management solution for LCS.|publisher=marinelog.com|date=23 June 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111016211825/http://www.marinelog.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=991%3A2011jun00230&catid=1%3Alatest-news&Itemid=107|archive-date=16 October 2011}}</ref> In 2011, seven U.S. senators sent a letter to the Department of Defense questioning the management of the corrosion problems of ''Independence''.<ref>{{cite web|last=Cavas |first=Christopher P. |url=http://www.navytimes.com/news/2011/07/navy-lcs-senators-question-qualifications-071311w/ |title=7 senators question certifications for LCS. |work=NavyTimes |date=13 July 2011 |access-date=14 March 2015}}</ref> In July 2011, a Navy [[Public Information Officer]] reported that a "[[cathodic protection]] system" would be installed on the ship.<ref>{{cite news |last=Fanto |first=Clarence |url=http://www.berkshireeagle.com/ci_18534091 |title=Navy: Ship rust fixed. |work=Berkshire Eagle |date=23 July 2011 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402115525/http://www.berkshireeagle.com/ci_18534091 |archive-date=2 April 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref> Such systems generally consist of strategically located deposits of "sacrificial metals" which act as an anode to reduce corrosion of the metal being protected. |
||
On 2 May 2012, ''Independence'' completed her maiden voyage to her [[homeport]], |
On 2 May 2012, ''Independence'' completed her maiden voyage to her [[homeport]], Naval Base San Diego, CA,<ref>{{cite press release |url=http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=66938 |title=Independence Arrives in San Diego |id=NNS120502-16 |author=USS Independence (LCS 2) Public Affairs |publisher=Navy News Service |date=2 May 2012 |access-date=10 December 2015}}</ref> where she was assigned to [[Littoral Combat Ship Squadron One]]<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.public.navy.mil/surfor/lcsron1/Pages/default.aspx|title=LCS Squadron 1|publisher=public.navy.mil.|access-date=25 February 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180226211745/http://www.public.navy.mil/surfor/lcsron1/Pages/default.aspx|archive-date=26 February 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
In 2013, U.S. Navy |
In 2013, leaked U.S. Navy documents that showed that the ship was originally to be named USS ''Liberty'', but the name was changed due to the controversial 1967 [[USS Liberty incident|USS ''Liberty'' incident]].<ref> https://www.military.com/daily-news/2013/06/08/survivors-say-navy-balked-at-naming-new-ship-liberty.html </ref><ref> https://www.businessinsider.com/navy-balked-at-naming-ship-liberty-2013-6 </ref> This was uncovered by a [[Freedom of Information Act]] request that showed ''Liberty'' appearing on a list of recommended names to the Secretary of the Navy; the [[Naval Vessel Register]] identified LCS-2 as the ''Liberty'' before it was changed to the ''Independence''.<ref> https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/naming-of-uss-liberty-lcs-2-1338/ </ref> |
||
On 19 May 2014, a spokesman for the U.S. Pacific Fleet confirmed that ''Independence'' would take part in [[RIMPAC]] 2014, reversing an earlier decision to keep littoral combat ships in southern California to carry out tests and various exercises. |
On 19 May 2014, a spokesman for the U.S. Pacific Fleet confirmed that ''Independence'' would take part in [[RIMPAC]] 2014, reversing an earlier decision to keep littoral combat ships in southern California to carry out tests and various exercises. The ship would join more than two dozen foreign ships and a similar number of Navy ships in exercises off Hawaii from 6–25 July 2014.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.militarytimes.com/article/20140519/NEWS/305190041/Navy-changes-course-sends-LCS-Hawaii-RIMPAC |title=Navy changes course, sends LCS to Hawaii for RIMPAC |work=Military Times |last=Cavas |first=Christopher P. |date=19 May 2014 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141107193233/http://www.militarytimes.com/article/20140519/NEWS/305190041/Navy-changes-course-sends-LCS-Hawaii-RIMPAC |archive-date=7 November 2014 |url-status=live }}</ref> ''Independence'' was operating out of [[San Diego]] testing her MCM package when it was decided that she would take part in RIMPAC 2014, so the ship returned to port and switched it out for the surface warfare package in 96 hours. The first RIMPAC scenario was acting as plane guard for the aircraft carrier {{USS|Ronald Reagan|CVN-76|6}}, for which it received "Bravo Zulu" (well done) from the strike group commander. In a four-hour event, the ship played opposition force alone against four other vessels, going nearly two hours without being located. ''Independence'' performed her first joint combined operations, acting as an afloat forward staging base for Navy and foreign fast-roping helicopter operating teams, and operated two helicopters near simultaneously while launching and recovering boats. The ship performed two to three tasks per day and completed them all while not needing to pull into port and being refueled twice. RIMPAC exercises were at a much higher operating tempo than previous tests, and ''Independence'' accomplished all tasks without experiencing any major difficulties.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.defensenews.com/article/20140830/DEFREG02/308300022/RIMPAC-Exercise-Puts-LCS-Through-Paces |archive-url=http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20140830162700/http://www.defensenews.com/article/20140830/DEFREG02/308300022/RIMPAC%2DExercise%2DPuts%2DLCS%2DThrough%2DPaces |url-status=dead |archive-date=30 August 2014 |title=RIMPAC Exercise Puts LCS Through Paces |work=DefenseNews |last=Cavas |first=Christopher P. |date=30 August 2014 |access-date=14 March 2015 }}</ref> |
||
''Independence'' tested the MCM and ASW mission modules for the littoral combat ship designs during the summer of 2014. It was the first time the ship had conducted end-to-end missions, and the crew successfully performed at the high operational tempos. When moving through a mock minefield twice, the suite of counter-mine technologies detected mines each instance and completed search, detect, and destroy phases; it was also the first time all three components of the MCM package had been integrated on board the ship. Testing of the ASW package was conducted in September, where for the first time both the active and passive sonars were towed at once to make sure the two systems did not cross.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dodbuzz.com/2014/11/06/navys-lcs-tests-counter-mine-anti-submarine-technology/ |title=Navy's LCS Tests Counter-Mine, Anti-Submarine Technology |work=DoDBuzz.com |date=7 November 2014 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141107190242/http://www.dodbuzz.com/2014/11/06/navys-lcs-tests-counter-mine-anti-submarine-technology/ |archive-date=7 November 2014 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
''Independence'' tested the MCM and ASW mission modules for the littoral combat ship designs during the summer of 2014. It was the first time the ship had conducted end-to-end missions, and the crew successfully performed at the high operational tempos. When moving through a mock minefield twice, the suite of counter-mine technologies detected mines each instance and completed search, detect, and destroy phases; it was also the first time all three components of the MCM package had been integrated on board the ship. Testing of the ASW package was conducted in September, where for the first time both the active and passive sonars were towed at once to make sure the two systems did not cross.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dodbuzz.com/2014/11/06/navys-lcs-tests-counter-mine-anti-submarine-technology/ |title=Navy's LCS Tests Counter-Mine, Anti-Submarine Technology |work=DoDBuzz.com |date=7 November 2014 |access-date=14 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141107190242/http://www.dodbuzz.com/2014/11/06/navys-lcs-tests-counter-mine-anti-submarine-technology/ |archive-date=7 November 2014 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
On 20 June 2020, the US Navy announced that they would be taking ''Independence'' out of commission in March 2021, and placing her, along with {{USS|Freedom|LCS-1|2}}, {{USS|Fort Worth|LCS-3|2}}, and {{USS|Coronado|LCS-4|2}} in reserve.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Trevithick |first=Joseph |url=https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/34558/navy-will-mothball-its-first-four-littoral-combat-ships-in-nine-months-if-congress-lets-it |title=Navy Will Mothball Its First Four Littoral Combat Ships in Nine Months If Congress Lets It |publisher= |
On 20 June 2020, the US Navy announced that they would be taking ''Independence'' out of commission in March 2021, and placing her, along with {{USS|Freedom|LCS-1|2}}, {{USS|Fort Worth|LCS-3|2}}, and {{USS|Coronado|LCS-4|2}} in reserve.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Trevithick |first=Joseph |url=https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/34558/navy-will-mothball-its-first-four-littoral-combat-ships-in-nine-months-if-congress-lets-it |title=Navy Will Mothball Its First Four Littoral Combat Ships in Nine Months If Congress Lets It |publisher=The War Zone |date= 1 July 2020 |access-date= 24 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Larter |first=David B. |url=https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2020/07/01/the-us-navys-first-4-littoral-combat-ships-are-out-of-the-fleet-in-9-months/ |title= US Navy's first 4 littoral combat ships to leave the fleet in 9 months |publisher= DefenseNews.com |date= 1 July 2020 |access-date= 29 August 2020}}</ref> |
||
On 29 July 2021, the Navy decommissioned ''Independence'' during a private ceremony at Naval Base San Diego, CA.<ref name="distinguished">{{Cite web|title=USS Independence (LCS 2) Decommissions After Distinguished Service|url=https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/Article/2713512/uss-independence-lcs-2-decommissions-after-distinguished-service/|access-date=2021-07-30|website=United States Navy|language=en-US}}</ref> |
On 29 July 2021, the Navy decommissioned ''Independence'' during a private ceremony at Naval Base San Diego, CA.<ref name="distinguished">{{Cite web|title=USS Independence (LCS 2) Decommissions After Distinguished Service|url=https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/Article/2713512/uss-independence-lcs-2-decommissions-after-distinguished-service/|access-date=2021-07-30|website=United States Navy|language=en-US}}</ref> |
||
As of 2022, ''Independence'', resides with the US [[Naval Inactive Ship Maintenance Facility]] in Bremerton, |
As of 2022, ''Independence'', resides with the US [[Naval Inactive Ship Maintenance Facility]] in Bremerton, WA.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nvr.navy.mil/SHIPDETAILS/SHIPSDETAIL_LCS_2.HTML|title=INDEPENDENCE (LCS 2)|publisher=nvr.navy.mil|date=30 January 2022|access-date=30 January 2022}}</ref> |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
* [[Milgem-class corvette]] |
* [[Milgem-class corvette]] |
||
* [[F125-class frigate]] |
* [[F125-class frigate]] |
||
* [[F110 class frigate]], a trimaran frigate design by [[Navantia]], Spain |
|||
* ''[[Buque de Acción Marítima]]'', modular ship with several variants for the Spanish Navy built by [[Navantia]], Spain |
* ''[[Buque de Acción Marítima]]'', modular ship with several variants for the Spanish Navy built by [[Navantia]], Spain |
||
Line 150: | Line 149: | ||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
{{commons category|USS Independence (LCS-2)}} |
{{commons category|USS Independence (LCS-2)}} |
||
*[http://www.public.navy.mil/surfor/lcs2/Pages/default.aspx Ship's website] |
|||
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20060902182928/http://www.news.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=22989 LCS-2 receives name] |
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20060902182928/http://www.news.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=22989 LCS-2 receives name] |
||
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20070121164851/http://www.gdlcs.com/ General Dynamics LCS program] |
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20070121164851/http://www.gdlcs.com/ General Dynamics LCS program] |
||
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20060620035007/http://www.gdlcs.com/images/lcs_engineer_front.gif General Dynamics engineering graphic] |
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20060620035007/http://www.gdlcs.com/images/lcs_engineer_front.gif General Dynamics engineering graphic] |
||
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20080820010818/http://austal.com/go/product-information/defence-products/littoral-combat-ship-(lcs) Austal Defence link on LCS] |
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20080820010818/http://austal.com/go/product-information/defence-products/littoral-combat-ship-(lcs) Austal Defence link on LCS] |
||
*[http://www.navy.mil/navydata/featurePlay.asp?id=62 United States Navy video on USS Independence (LCS-2)] |
|||
<!-- non-breaking space to keep AWB drones from altering the space before the navbox--> |
|||
{{Littoral combat ships}} |
{{Littoral combat ships}} |
||
Latest revision as of 21:32, 10 October 2024
USS Independence at Key West on 29 March 2010 | |
History | |
---|---|
United States | |
Name | Independence |
Namesake | Independence |
Awarded | 14 October 2005[1] |
Builder | Austal USA[1] |
Laid down | 19 January 2006[1] |
Launched | 26 April 2008[1] |
Christened | 4 October 2008 |
Commissioned | 16 January 2010[2] |
Decommissioned | 29 July 2021[3] |
Homeport | San Diego[1] |
Identification | Hull number: LCS-2 |
Motto |
|
Status | Decommissioned |
Badge | |
General characteristics | |
Class and type | Independence-class littoral combat ship |
Displacement |
|
Length | 128.4 m (421 ft)[1] |
Beam | 31.6 m (104 ft)[1] |
Draft | 14 ft (4.27 m)[1] |
Propulsion | 2× MTU Friedrichshafen 20V 8000 Series diesel engines, 2× General Electric LM2500 gas turbines,[4] 2× American VULKAN light weight multiple-section carbon fiber propulsion shaft lines, 4× Wärtsilä waterjets,[5] retractable bow-mounted azimuth thruster, 4× diesel generators |
Speed | 44 knots (51 mph; 81 km/h)[6] |
Range | 4,300 nm at 18 knots[7] |
Capacity | 210 t (210 long tons; 230 short tons) |
Complement | 43 core crew (11 officers, 32 enlisted) plus up to 35 mission crew |
Sensors and processing systems |
|
Electronic warfare & decoys |
|
Armament |
|
Aircraft carried |
USS Independence (LCS-2) is the lead ship of the Independence-class of littoral combat ships. She is the sixth ship of the United States Navy to be named for the concept of independence. The design was produced by the General Dynamics consortium for the Navy's LCS program, and competes with the Lockheed Martin–designed Freedom variant.[10]
Independence, delivered to the Navy at the end of 2009, was a high-speed, small-crew corvette, although the U.S. Navy does not use the term, intended to operate littoral waters. She can swap out various systems to take on various missions, including finding and destroying mines, hunting submarines in and near shallow water, and fighting small boats (she is not intended to fight warships). The ship is a trimaran design with a wide beam above the waterline that supports a larger flight deck than those of the Navy's much larger destroyers and cruisers, as well as a large hangar and a similarly large mission bay below. The trimaran hull also exhibits low hydrodynamic drag, allowing efficient operation on two diesel-powered water jets at speeds up to 18 knots (33 km/h; 21 mph), and high-speed operation on two gas turbine–powered water jets at a sustainable 44 knots (81 km/h; 51 mph) and even faster for short periods.
On 29 July 2021, the Navy decommissioned Independence during a private ceremony at Naval Base San Diego, California.[3]
Description
[edit]The design for Independence is based on a high-speed trimaran (Benchijigua Express) hull built by Austal (Henderson, Australia). The 418-foot (127 m) surface combatant design requires a crew of 43 sailors.
With 11,000 cubic meters (390,000 cu ft) of payload volume, she was designed to carry two mission modules, allowing the ship to do multiple missions without having to be refitted. The flight deck, at 1,030 m2 (11,100 sq ft), can support two SH-60 Seahawk helicopters, multiple unmanned aerial vehicles, or one CH-53 Sea Stallion-class helicopter. The trimaran aluminum hull will allow flight operations up to sea state 5.[11]
Independence carries a default armament for self-defense. Unlike traditional combatants with fixed armament such as guns and missiles, tailored mission modules can be configured for one mission package at a time. Modules may consist of manned aircraft, unmanned vehicles, offboard sensors, or mission manning detachments.
The interior volume and payload is greater than some destroyers, allowing the ship to serve as a high-speed transport-and-maneuver platform. The 15,200-square-foot (1,410 m2) mission bay takes up most of the deck below the hangar and flight deck. Packages the size of a 20-foot-long (6.1 m) shipping container can be airlifted onto the deck at sea, then moved by an elevator into the mission bay.
In addition to cargo or container-sized mission modules, the bay can carry four lanes of multiple Strykers, armored Humvees, and their associated troops. A side ramp allows vehicle roll-on/roll-off loading to a dock and would have allowed the ship to transport the cancelled Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle.[12]
Bunks and living spaces are below the bridge. The helm is controlled by joysticks instead of a traditional steering wheel.[13]
Independence also has an integrated LOS Mast, Sea Giraffe 3D radar and SeaStar Safire FLIR. Side and forward surfaces are angled to reduce the ship's radar profile. In addition, H-60-series helicopters provide airlift, rescue, anti-submarine, radar picket and anti-ship capabilities with torpedoes and missiles.
The Raytheon Evolved SeaRAM missile defense system is installed on the hangar roof. The SeaRAM combines the sensors of the Phalanx 1B close in weapon system with an eleven missile launcher for the Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM), creating an autonomous system.[14]
Northrop Grumman has demonstrated sensor fusion of on and off board systems in the Integrated Combat Management System (ICMS) used on Independence.[15]
Instead of the heavily protected Combat Information Center found on other Navy warships, Independence has an Interior Communications Center that can be curtained off from the rest of the bridge.[16]
Austal claims that Independence will use one-third less fuel than Freedom, but the Congressional Budget Office found that fuel would account for 18 percent or less of the total lifetime cost of Freedom. While it was unable to judge the fuel usage of Independence, the higher purchase price of Independence would dominate her lifetime costs.[17]
History
[edit]The contract was awarded to General Dynamics in July 2003.[18] The contract to build her was then awarded to Austal USA of Mobile, Alabama, on 14 October 2005 and her keel was laid down on 19 January 2006. Delivery to the United States Navy was scheduled for December 2008.
The originally planned second General Dynamics ship (LCS-4) was canceled on 1 November 2007.[19] On 1 May 2009, a second vessel was reordered by the Navy, USS Coronado. The keel was laid on 17 December 2009,[20] with delivery scheduled for May 2012.[21] The ship was delivered 27 September 2013.[22]
For fiscal year 2010, the Navy planned a competition between Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics for the next three littoral combat ships, with the winner building two ships and the loser only one.[23] Independence was christened 5 October 2008 by Doreen Scott, wife of 10th Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy Terry D. Scott.[24]
Navy leaders said that the fixed price competition offered the Austal design an equal shot, in spite of her excess size, cost and limited service.[25] In June 2009, the development and construction of Independence was 220% over-budget. The total projected cost for the ship was $704 million. The Navy had originally projected the cost at $220 million.[26] Independence began builder's trials near Mobile, Alabama on 2 July 2009, three days behind schedule because of maintenance issues.[27]
In response to problems with the propulsion plant (the port gas turbine shaft seal sprang a leak), General Dynamics rearranged builder's trials to test other systems until this was fixed.[28] The ship completed builder's trials on 21 October 2009[29] and acceptance trials on 19 November 2009.[30]
On 9 December 2009, the Navy announced that the ship had completed the first INSURV inspection. The inspection found 2,080 discrepancies, including 39 high-priority deficiencies, but concluded that all could be resolved before the Navy accepted the ship as scheduled. The ship was delivered to the Navy on 17 December 2009, and the service officially accepted her the next day.[20] However, the ship was found to be incomplete and a second round of acceptance trials was scheduled for 2011.[31]
The ship was commissioned on 16 January 2010 at Mobile, Alabama[32] and completed her maiden voyage in April 2010.[33]
In 2010, the Navy asked for an additional $5.3 million to correct problems found in the sea trials.[34] Galvanic corrosion caused by an aluminum hull acts as an anode in contact with the stainless steel propulsion system with sea water acting as an electrolyte, and electrical currents not fully isolated, caused "aggressive corrosion."[35][36] Prior to the discovery of corrosion, Austal and General Dynamics had both agreed to dissolve their relationship with each other and agree to act as competitors in March.[37] The cause of the split was due to the planned competition between Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics.[37] Prior to the split, General Dynamics was to continue maintenance on the ship after she entered service.[38] In 2011 the corrosion problem was found to be even worse than expected and repair would require time in a drydock to completely remove the water jets.[35] In response, Austal blamed the U.S. Navy for not properly maintaining the ship.[39][40] However the Navy replied that the electrical insulation had been improperly installed during construction.[41] Later Austal said it had found a fix for the problem that would be tested on the third Austal LCS ship.[42] In 2011, seven U.S. senators sent a letter to the Department of Defense questioning the management of the corrosion problems of Independence.[43] In July 2011, a Navy Public Information Officer reported that a "cathodic protection system" would be installed on the ship.[44] Such systems generally consist of strategically located deposits of "sacrificial metals" which act as an anode to reduce corrosion of the metal being protected.
On 2 May 2012, Independence completed her maiden voyage to her homeport, Naval Base San Diego, CA,[45] where she was assigned to Littoral Combat Ship Squadron One[46]
In 2013, leaked U.S. Navy documents that showed that the ship was originally to be named USS Liberty, but the name was changed due to the controversial 1967 USS Liberty incident.[47][48] This was uncovered by a Freedom of Information Act request that showed Liberty appearing on a list of recommended names to the Secretary of the Navy; the Naval Vessel Register identified LCS-2 as the Liberty before it was changed to the Independence.[49]
On 19 May 2014, a spokesman for the U.S. Pacific Fleet confirmed that Independence would take part in RIMPAC 2014, reversing an earlier decision to keep littoral combat ships in southern California to carry out tests and various exercises. The ship would join more than two dozen foreign ships and a similar number of Navy ships in exercises off Hawaii from 6–25 July 2014.[50] Independence was operating out of San Diego testing her MCM package when it was decided that she would take part in RIMPAC 2014, so the ship returned to port and switched it out for the surface warfare package in 96 hours. The first RIMPAC scenario was acting as plane guard for the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan, for which it received "Bravo Zulu" (well done) from the strike group commander. In a four-hour event, the ship played opposition force alone against four other vessels, going nearly two hours without being located. Independence performed her first joint combined operations, acting as an afloat forward staging base for Navy and foreign fast-roping helicopter operating teams, and operated two helicopters near simultaneously while launching and recovering boats. The ship performed two to three tasks per day and completed them all while not needing to pull into port and being refueled twice. RIMPAC exercises were at a much higher operating tempo than previous tests, and Independence accomplished all tasks without experiencing any major difficulties.[51]
Independence tested the MCM and ASW mission modules for the littoral combat ship designs during the summer of 2014. It was the first time the ship had conducted end-to-end missions, and the crew successfully performed at the high operational tempos. When moving through a mock minefield twice, the suite of counter-mine technologies detected mines each instance and completed search, detect, and destroy phases; it was also the first time all three components of the MCM package had been integrated on board the ship. Testing of the ASW package was conducted in September, where for the first time both the active and passive sonars were towed at once to make sure the two systems did not cross.[52]
On 20 June 2020, the US Navy announced that they would be taking Independence out of commission in March 2021, and placing her, along with Freedom, Fort Worth, and Coronado in reserve.[53][54] On 29 July 2021, the Navy decommissioned Independence during a private ceremony at Naval Base San Diego, CA.[3]
As of 2022, Independence, resides with the US Naval Inactive Ship Maintenance Facility in Bremerton, WA.[55]
See also
[edit]- Absalon-class command and support ship
- Sea Shadow (IX-529) United States
- USS Independence, United States
- Sea Fighter, United States
- RV Triton, a trimaran concept for Britain's Future Surface Combatant program
- Future Surface Combatant, United Kingdom
- La Fayette-class frigate
- Skjold-class patrol boat
- Visby-class corvette
- Houbei-class missile boat
- Braunschweig-class corvette
- Milgem-class corvette
- F125-class frigate
- Buque de Acción Marítima, modular ship with several variants for the Spanish Navy built by Navantia, Spain
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f g h i "Independence". Naval Vessel Register. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ Shalal-Esa, Andrea (16 January 2009). "US Navy commissions newest warship, others coming". Reuters. Archived from the original on 31 May 2010. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ a b c "USS Independence (LCS 2) Decommissions After Distinguished Service". United States Navy. Retrieved 30 July 2021.
- ^ "GE and U.S. Navy Celebrate 40th Operating Anniversary of LM2500 Gas Turbine" (Press release). GE Aviation. 27 October 2009. Archived from the original on 11 December 2010. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ Thompson, Jason (1 February 2010). "USS Independence LCS-2 – GE LM2500 Gas Turbines". Diesel Power. Archived from the original on 13 November 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ Sharp, David (22 October 2009). "Navy's newest warships top out at more than 50 mph". KOMO News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 17 August 2016. Retrieved 21 July 2016.
- ^ Reilly, Sean (4 April 2010). "In high-stakes LCS competition, disagreement on how to rank the best deal". AL.com. Archived from the original on 5 March 2012. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ "GDLCS Media Center". Austal General Dynamics Dynamics. Archived from the original on 1 May 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ "US Navy Fact File: Littoral Combat Ship Class – LCS". US Navy. Archived from the original on 2 March 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ "USS Independence LCS 2 – General Info". ussindependence.org. Archived from the original on 2 April 2010.
- ^ "General Dynamics Littoral Combat Ship brochure" (PDF). gdlcs.com.[dead link ]
- ^ Cavas, Christopher P. (11 January 2010). "LCS 2 features large hangar, bigger berths". Military Times. Archived from the original on 2 October 2013. Retrieved 14 March 2015.(subscription required)
- ^ "Raytheon Delivers SeaRAM to USS Independence". Raytheon Company. Archived from the original on 15 January 2016. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ "Northrop Grumman-Led Team Demonstrates Means to Effectively Enhance Littoral Warfighting Capabilities". NASDAQ Global Newswire. 18 August 2009. Archived from the original on 20 February 2012. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ Cavas, Christopher P. (12 April 2010). "LCS 2: 'It'll blow your mind'". NavyTimes. Retrieved 14 March 2015. (subscription required)
- ^ Reilly, Sean (7 May 2010). "Navy not using fuel cost data in LCS competition". AL.com. Archived from the original on 8 March 2012. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ "General Dynamics Bath Iron Works Team Wins Preliminary Design Award for U.S. Navy's Littoral Combat Ship". General Dynamics (Press release). 17 July 2003. Archived from the original on 28 September 2007.
- ^ "Navy Terminates Littoral Combat Ship (LCS 4) Contract" (Press release). US Department of Defense. 1 November 2007. Archived from the original on 4 November 2007. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ a b "General Dynamics Littoral Combat Ship Team Delivers Independence (LCS 2) and Lays Keel for Coronado (LCS 4)" (Press release). PR Newswire. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ Wilkinson, Kaija (1 May 2009). "Navy orders second LCS from Austal". AL.com. Archived from the original on 3 March 2012. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ "Navy Accepts Delivery of USS Coronado". World Maritime News. 30 September 2013. Archived from the original on 13 December 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ Sharp, David (3 April 2008). "Navy Restarting Contest for Halted Shipbuilding Program". The Washington Post. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 4 November 2012. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ Wilkinson, Kaija, "Independence's Day: Austal Warship Christened", Mobile Press-Register, 5 October 2008.
- ^ "Navy says the field is level for teams competing for LCS contract". al.com. Archived from the original on 17 January 2013.
- ^ Ewing, Philip (29 June 2009). "LCS 2 delays trials after engine issue". Military Times. Archived from the original on 17 December 2013. Retrieved 14 March 2015.(subscription required)
- ^ Ewing, Philip (3 July 2009). "LCS 2 begins sea trials after 3-day delay]". Military Times. Archived from the original on 2 October 2013. Retrieved 14 March 2015.(subscription required)
- ^ Ewing, Philip (4 August 2009). "Turbine-seal leak means more tests for LCS 2". NavyTimes. Retrieved 14 March 2015. (subscription required)
- ^ Ewing, Philip (21 October 2009). "After delays, LCS 2 completes builder trials". Military Times. Archived from the original on 17 December 2013. Retrieved 14 March 2015.(subscription required)
- ^ Cavas, Christopher P. (21 November 2009). "Trials successful for 2nd LCS hull". Military Times. Archived from the original on 2 October 2013. Retrieved 14 March 2015.(subscription required)
- ^ "Navy report of LCS status in 2010" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ Surface Forces Public Affairs (16 January 2010). "USS Independence Commissioned" (Press release). Navy News Service. NNS100116-31. Archived from the original on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ "USS Independence Completes Maiden Voyage". naval-technology.com. 19 April 2010. Archived from the original on 11 November 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ "Little changing for Corps in funding shift". Archived from the original on 29 August 2011.
- ^ a b Lerman, David (17 June 2011). "Navy Finds 'Aggressive' Corrosion on New Ship". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on 20 July 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ Axe, Davis (23 June 2011). "Builder Blames Navy as Brand-New Warship Disintegrates". Wired Magazine. Archived from the original on 29 March 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ a b Cavas, Christopher (4 March 2010). "GD and Austal Split Up To Bid on LCS". DefenseNews.com. Archived from the original on 2 January 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ Axe, David (5 July 2011). "Plenty of Blame to Go Around for 'Disappearing' Warship". Wired.com. Archived from the original on 4 March 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ Lynch, Jared (21 June 2011). "Rust not our fault, insists Austal". The Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ Axe, David (23 June 2011). "Builder Blames Navy as Brand-New Warship Disintegrates". Wired. Archived from the original on 29 March 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ Ashton Carter (13 July 2011). "Carter letter to Brown". Department of Defense. Archived from the original on 22 February 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ "Austal develops corrosion management solution for LCS". marinelog.com. 23 June 2011. Archived from the original on 16 October 2011.
- ^ Cavas, Christopher P. (13 July 2011). "7 senators question certifications for LCS". NavyTimes. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ Fanto, Clarence (23 July 2011). "Navy: Ship rust fixed". Berkshire Eagle. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ USS Independence (LCS 2) Public Affairs (2 May 2012). "Independence Arrives in San Diego" (Press release). Navy News Service. NNS120502-16. Retrieved 10 December 2015.
{{cite press release}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "LCS Squadron 1". public.navy.mil. Archived from the original on 26 February 2018. Retrieved 25 February 2018.
- ^ https://www.military.com/daily-news/2013/06/08/survivors-say-navy-balked-at-naming-new-ship-liberty.html
- ^ https://www.businessinsider.com/navy-balked-at-naming-ship-liberty-2013-6
- ^ https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/naming-of-uss-liberty-lcs-2-1338/
- ^ Cavas, Christopher P. (19 May 2014). "Navy changes course, sends LCS to Hawaii for RIMPAC". Military Times. Archived from the original on 7 November 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ Cavas, Christopher P. (30 August 2014). "RIMPAC Exercise Puts LCS Through Paces". DefenseNews. Archived from the original on 30 August 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ "Navy's LCS Tests Counter-Mine, Anti-Submarine Technology". DoDBuzz.com. 7 November 2014. Archived from the original on 7 November 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- ^ Trevithick, Joseph (1 July 2020). "Navy Will Mothball Its First Four Littoral Combat Ships in Nine Months If Congress Lets It". The War Zone. Retrieved 24 July 2020.
- ^ Larter, David B. (1 July 2020). "US Navy's first 4 littoral combat ships to leave the fleet in 9 months". DefenseNews.com. Retrieved 29 August 2020.
- ^ "INDEPENDENCE (LCS 2)". nvr.navy.mil. 30 January 2022. Retrieved 30 January 2022.
- This article includes information collected from the Naval Vessel Register, which, as a U.S. government publication, is in the public domain. The entry can be found here.