Jump to content

Talk:Military dictatorship: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 43 discussion(s) to Talk:Military dictatorship/Archive 1) (bot
Tag: Replaced
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Military dictatorship/Archive 1) (bot
 
(46 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Old peer review|ID=1245295981|reviewedname=Military dictatorship|date=19 September 2024|archive=2}}
{{Talkheader|archive_age=1|archive_units=year}}
{{Old peer review|ID=1188668592|reviewedname=Military dictatorship|date=9 December 2023|archive=1}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{Talkheader}}
{{WikiProject Military history
{{GA|18:58, 12 August 2023 (UTC)|topic=Social sciences and society|page=1|oldid=1170012134}}
|class=Start
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|vital=yes|1=
|B1=no
{{WikiProject Military history|class=GA|B1=yes|B2=yes|B3=yes|B4=yes|B5=yes|Historiography-task-force=yes}}
<!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. -->
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Mid}}
|B2=yes
<!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->
|B3=yes
<!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->
|B4=yes
<!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->
|B5=no
<!-- Task forces (general topics) -->
|Historiography-task-force=yes
}}
{{WikiProject Politics|oligarchy=yes|oligarchy-importance=mid|fascism=yes|fascism-importance=mid|class=start|importance=mid}}
{{WP1.0|class=Start|importance=Mid|WPCD=y}}
}}
}}
{{Annual readership|expanded=yes}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(365d)
| algo = old(365d)
Line 27: Line 17:
| minthreadsleft = 1
| minthreadsleft = 1
}}
}}

==5/1 Revision==
==5/1 Revision==
Mostly I cleaned up grammar and miscellaneous wording stuff. However, I did delete the sentence:<br>
Mostly I cleaned up grammar and miscellaneous wording stuff. However, I did delete the sentence:<br>
Line 34: Line 25:


== Latin America and Cold War ==
== Latin America and Cold War ==

The end of the Cold War didn't had much to do with the end of military dictatorships in Latin America. By the time Gorbachev started his government, there weren't that many dictators in Latin America and the fact the remaining few became democracies had a lot more to do with internal problems than external. For example, in Brazil the slow democratization process started way back in the 70s.
The end of the Cold War didn't had much to do with the end of military dictatorships in Latin America. By the time Gorbachev started his government, there weren't that many dictators in Latin America and the fact the remaining few became democracies had a lot more to do with internal problems than external. For example, in Brazil the slow democratization process started way back in the 70s.


== Possible false info? ==
== Possible false info? ==

[[Military_dictatorship#Current_cases|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_dictatorship#Current_cases]]
[[Military_dictatorship#Current_cases|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_dictatorship#Current_cases]]


Did something happen recently to Canada, or is this info false?
Did something happen recently to Canada, or is this info false?

==Croatia & Yugoslavia==
I can not figure by which criteria those 2 countries are in this list, so I deleted them.
[[User:N3k1ma1l|N3k1ma1l]] ([[User talk:N3k1ma1l|talk]]) 12:57, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

== Italy and San Marino ==

The Mussolini regime was not a military dictatorship; and calling the [[Fatti di Rovereta]] episone in San Marino a "military dictatoship" seems ridiculous.--[[User:MiguelMadeira|MiguelMadeira]] ([[User talk:MiguelMadeira|talk]]) 02:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

== "Era of Trumpism" ==

So apparently someone added the USA from 2017-2021 as military dictatorship. This seems incorrect to me since Trump was democratically elected. The Congress/Parliament remained functional during his administration and opposition wasn't oppressed, nor there has been a national state of emergency to empower military rule.

I would like to know other opinions so we can get to a conclusion.

~~ [[User:Lugrasio|Lugrasio]] ([[User talk:Lugrasio|talk]]) 18:24, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

:I removed it before seeing that you'd started this discussion. It was added by an anonymous user and isn't backed up by any sources. [[User:Standardorder|Standardorder]] ([[User talk:Standardorder|talk]]) 14:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:33, 14 October 2024

5/1 Revision

[edit]

Mostly I cleaned up grammar and miscellaneous wording stuff. However, I did delete the sentence:
Few Communist regimes are military dictatorships, and controlling the military so that it cannot challenge the party has been a persistent concern of these regimes.
Not because it was innacurate or controversial, but because it is basically repeated later in the article and it destroys the flow of the article where it was.
--Xinoph 23:03, May 1, 2004 (UTC)

Latin America and Cold War

[edit]

The end of the Cold War didn't had much to do with the end of military dictatorships in Latin America. By the time Gorbachev started his government, there weren't that many dictators in Latin America and the fact the remaining few became democracies had a lot more to do with internal problems than external. For example, in Brazil the slow democratization process started way back in the 70s.

Possible false info?

[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_dictatorship#Current_cases

Did something happen recently to Canada, or is this info false?