Paul D. Thacker: Difference between revisions
→Career: Irrelevant quotation Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
m adding "American journalist" as short description via DescDash |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|American journalist}} |
|||
{{Use mdy dates|date=February 2020}} |
{{Use mdy dates|date=February 2020}} |
||
[[File:Paul D. Thacker 9.22.11 (6196255522) (cropped).jpg|thumb|{{center|Paul D. Thacker}}]] |
[[File:Paul D. Thacker 9.22.11 (6196255522) (cropped).jpg|thumb|{{center|Paul D. Thacker}}]] |
||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
From 2012 to 2014, Thacker completed two fellowships at Harvard University’s Safra Center for Ethics.<ref>ethics.harvard.edu/people/paul-thacker</ref> |
From 2012 to 2014, Thacker completed two fellowships at Harvard University’s Safra Center for Ethics.<ref>ethics.harvard.edu/people/paul-thacker</ref> |
||
In November 2021, ''[[The BMJ]]'' published a piece by Thacker alleging there has been "poor practice" at Ventavia, one of the companies involved in the phase III evaluation trials of the Pfizer vaccine.<ref name="BMJ-20211102">{{cite journal |vauthors=Thacker PD |title=Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer's vaccine trial |journal=BMJ |volume=375 |issue= |pages=n2635 |date=November 2021 |pmid=34728500 |doi=10.1136/bmj.n2635 |url= |quote=A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported|doi-access=free }}</ref> The report was enthusiastically embraced by [[anti-vaccination]] activists. Questioning Thacker's work in [[Science-Based Medicine]], David Gorski wrote that his article presented facts without necessary context to misleading effect, playing up the seriousness of the noted problems.<ref>{{cite web |last=Gorski |first=David |author-link=David Gorski |title=What the heck happened to The BMJ? |date=8 November 2021 |url=https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/what-the-heck-happened-to-the-bmj/ |publisher=[[Science-Based Medicine]]}}</ref> Some experts have expressed skepticism over the allegations made in the report. Prominent vaccination expert [[Paul Offit]] has criticized the issues outlined in the report as being vague and has cautioned against assuming the claims made in it are true.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-11-05| first=Cheryl|last= Clark|title=Experts Blow Whistle on Alleged COVID Vaccine Whistleblower Claims|url=https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/95484|access-date=2022-01-11|website=[[MedPage Today]]|language=en}}</ref> The Association of British Science Writers chose the article as a finalist for the Steve Connor Award for Investigative Science Journalism. |
In November 2021, ''[[The BMJ]]'' published a piece by Thacker alleging there has been "poor practice" at Ventavia, one of the companies involved in the phase III evaluation trials of the Pfizer vaccine.<ref name="BMJ-20211102">{{cite journal |vauthors=Thacker PD |title=Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer's vaccine trial |journal=BMJ |volume=375 |issue= |pages=n2635 |date=November 2021 |pmid=34728500 |doi=10.1136/bmj.n2635 |url= |quote=A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported|doi-access=free }}</ref> The report was enthusiastically embraced by [[anti-vaccination]] activists. Questioning Thacker's work in [[Science-Based Medicine]], David Gorski wrote that his article presented facts without necessary context to misleading effect, playing up the seriousness of the noted problems.<ref>{{cite web |last=Gorski |first=David |author-link=David Gorski |title=What the heck happened to The BMJ? |date=8 November 2021 |url=https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/what-the-heck-happened-to-the-bmj/ |publisher=[[Science-Based Medicine]]}}</ref> Some experts have expressed skepticism over the allegations made in the report. Prominent vaccination expert [[Paul Offit]] has criticized the issues outlined in the report as being vague and has cautioned against assuming the claims made in it are true.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-11-05| first=Cheryl|last= Clark|title=Experts Blow Whistle on Alleged COVID Vaccine Whistleblower Claims|url=https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/95484|access-date=2022-01-11|website=[[MedPage Today]]|language=en}}</ref> The Association of British Science Writers chose the article as a finalist for the Steve Connor Award for Investigative Science Journalism.<ref name="absw-2022-award-finalists">{{cite web |title=ABSW Awards 2022: The Finalists |url=https://www.absw.org.uk/pages/absw-awards-2022-the-finalists |website=Association of British Science Writers |access-date=6 May 2024}}</ref> |
||
Thacker received the 2021 British Journalism Award for Specialist Journalism for a series of articles in ''The BMJ'' investigating undisclosed financial interests among medical experts advising the US and UK governments on vaccines. The award judges said “[t]his was expertly researched and written journalism on a subject of huge national importance.”<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Coombes |first1=Rebecca |title=Investigative journalist wins British Journalism Award for "expertly researched" ''BMJ'' series |journal=[[The BMJ]] |date=December 9, 2021 |volume=375 |pages=n3052 |doi=10.1136/bmj.n3052 | pmid=34887249|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Tobitt |first1=Charlotte |title=British Journalism Awards winners revealed for 2021 |url=https://pressgazette.co.uk/british-journalism-awards-winners-2021/ |work=[[Press Gazette]] |date=December 8, 2021}}</ref> |
Thacker received the 2021 British Journalism Award for Specialist Journalism for a series of articles in ''The BMJ'' investigating undisclosed financial interests among medical experts advising the US and UK governments on vaccines. The award judges said “[t]his was expertly researched and written journalism on a subject of huge national importance.”<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Coombes |first1=Rebecca |title=Investigative journalist wins British Journalism Award for "expertly researched" ''BMJ'' series |journal=[[The BMJ]] |date=December 9, 2021 |volume=375 |pages=n3052 |doi=10.1136/bmj.n3052 | pmid=34887249|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Tobitt |first1=Charlotte |title=British Journalism Awards winners revealed for 2021 |url=https://pressgazette.co.uk/british-journalism-awards-winners-2021/ |work=[[Press Gazette]] |date=December 8, 2021}}</ref> |
||
== Anti-Vaccine Reporting == |
|||
In a 2023 article in [[Politico]] about [[Robert F. Kennedy Jr.]]'s history of endorsing conspiracy theories, Thacker is described as an "anti-vaccine reporter."<ref>{{cite news |last1=Freedlander |first1=David |title=RFK Jr.’s Ultimate Vanity Project |url=https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/10/08/robert-f-kennedy-jr-2024-campaign-profile-00119959 |work=[[Politico]] |date=October 8, 2023}}</ref> The American chapter of the British charity [[Sense about Science]], which promotes [[public awareness of science]], noted Thacker's collaboration with anti-vaccine activists.<ref>{{cite web |title=Fake news, science, and pseudo journalism |url=https://senseaboutscienceusa.org/fake-news-science-pseudo-journalism/ |work=[[Sense about Science]]}}</ref> |
|||
== Notes == |
== Notes == |
||
| Line 22: | Line 26: | ||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
{{Commons category}} |
{{Commons category}} |
||
*[https://substack.com/@disinformationchronicle Thacker's substack page] |
|||
*Thacker interview. [https://www.pbs.org/wnet/expose/2008/05/111-index.html "Science Fiction"], [[Exposé: America's Investigative Reports]], ''[[Public Broadcasting Service|PBS]]'' |
*Thacker interview. [https://www.pbs.org/wnet/expose/2008/05/111-index.html "Science Fiction"], [[Exposé: America's Investigative Reports]], ''[[Public Broadcasting Service|PBS]]'' |
||
Latest revision as of 23:42, 14 October 2024
_(cropped).jpg)
Paul D. Thacker is an American journalist who reports on science, medicine, and the environment.[1][2] He was a lead investigator of the United States Senate Committee on Finance for Senator Chuck Grassley, where he examined financial links between physicians and pharmaceutical companies.[3]
Early life
[edit]Thacker was raised in California and Texas, and joined the US Army after high school, where he was deployed in Saudi Arabia and Iraq during the Gulf War.[4][5] He earned a Bachelor of Science degree in biology, with an emphasis in ecology and evolution, from the University of California, Davis in 1997.[6][4] He worked as a laboratory technician at Emory University before turning to journalism, leaving Emory for an Audubon magazine internship in 2000.[4]
Career
[edit]After 2000, Thacker wrote for publications such as The New Republic and Salon and was a staff writer with Environmental Science & Technology, a journal of the American Chemical Society (ACS). Here he published a series of exposés that a senior ACS official claimed showed an anti-industry bias, culminating in an article on the Weinberg Group that resulted in him being fired by the journal in 2006.[4][7][8] In Thacker's Weinberg Group story he wrote about a letter that group sent to DuPont outlining a plan to protect DuPont from litigation and regulation over Teflon.[9] The Weinberg Group had done similar work for Big Tobacco and then began working in Europe to defeat alcohol regulations.[10][specify] ACS editor Rudy Baum called the Weinberg article a "hatchet job".[11][8] In 2006, the Weinberg article won a second place prize in annual awards presented by the US Society of Environmental Journalists.[12] Later that year, Thacker's work was profiled on Exposé: America's Investigative Reports.[13]
In 2007, Thacker joined the United States Senate Committee on Finance for Republican Senator Chuck Grassley, investigating medical research conflicts of interest.[4][14] Among his work he identified several physicians who had failed to disclose payments from drug and medical companies, including psychiatrist Charles Nemeroff.[15] He also led the committee's investigation of the drug Avandia,[16] which included a report that a medical journal had published a ghostwritten article promoting the drug.[5] He left the committee in 2010 to join the Project on Government Oversight, a nonprofit watchdog organization.[15][5][17]
From 2012 to 2014, Thacker completed two fellowships at Harvard University’s Safra Center for Ethics.[18]
In November 2021, The BMJ published a piece by Thacker alleging there has been "poor practice" at Ventavia, one of the companies involved in the phase III evaluation trials of the Pfizer vaccine.[19] The report was enthusiastically embraced by anti-vaccination activists. Questioning Thacker's work in Science-Based Medicine, David Gorski wrote that his article presented facts without necessary context to misleading effect, playing up the seriousness of the noted problems.[20] Some experts have expressed skepticism over the allegations made in the report. Prominent vaccination expert Paul Offit has criticized the issues outlined in the report as being vague and has cautioned against assuming the claims made in it are true.[21] The Association of British Science Writers chose the article as a finalist for the Steve Connor Award for Investigative Science Journalism.[22]
Thacker received the 2021 British Journalism Award for Specialist Journalism for a series of articles in The BMJ investigating undisclosed financial interests among medical experts advising the US and UK governments on vaccines. The award judges said “[t]his was expertly researched and written journalism on a subject of huge national importance.”[23][24]
Anti-Vaccine Reporting
[edit]In a 2023 article in Politico about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s history of endorsing conspiracy theories, Thacker is described as an "anti-vaccine reporter."[25] The American chapter of the British charity Sense about Science, which promotes public awareness of science, noted Thacker's collaboration with anti-vaccine activists.[26]
Notes
[edit]- ^ "Paul Thacker". The Daily Beast. April 2021. Retrieved January 11, 2022.
- ^ Berezow, Alex (June 8, 2020). "Meet the Journalist Who Is a 5G Conspiracy Theorist And His New Collaborator". American Council on Science and Health. Retrieved January 11, 2022.
- ^ Heffner, Alexander (October 4, 2011). "At HLS, former investigator questions the relationship between physicians and pharmaceutical industry". Harvard Law Today. Harvard Law School.
- ^ a b c d e Wadman, Meredith (September 17, 2009). "Money in biomedicine: The senator's sleuth". Nature. 461 (7262): 330–334. doi:10.1038/461330a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 19759593.
- ^ a b c Arnold, Matthew (October 2010). "Grassley's Ghostwriter Exits the Hill" (PDF). Medical Marketing & Media. p. 36. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 29, 2015. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
- ^ "Paul Thacker". ethics.harvard.edu. Retrieved January 22, 2021.
- ^ Thacker, Paul D. (Summer 2007). "Investigative reporting can produce a "higher obligation"" (PDF). SEJournal. 12 (4): 4+24.
- ^ a b Roberts, David (April 28, 2008). "Uncovering the Weinberg Group". Vanity Fair. Retrieved January 11, 2022.
- ^ Paul D. Thacker (February 22, 2006). "The Weinberg Proposal". Environmental Science & Technology. Archived from the original on June 10, 2008. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
- ^ McKee, Martin (2006). "A European Alcohol Strategy". British Medical Journal. 333 (7574): 871–872. doi:10.1136/bmj.39003.629606.be. PMC 1626340. PMID 17047004.
- ^ Baum, Rudy M. (Summer 2007). "ES&T, ACS officials respond" (PDF). SEJournal. 12 (4): 24.
- ^ "Society of Environmental Journalists: SEJ Awards". www.sejarchive.org.
- ^ Science Fiction, WNET
- ^ Weinstein, Jamie (May 11, 2007). "Grassley's Committee Staff Grows". Roll Call.
- ^ a b Kintisch, Eli (September 21, 2010). "New Post for Senate's Medical Research Watchdog". Science.
- ^ "U.S. restricts, E.U. bans controversial diabetes pill". The Standard-Times. AP. September 23, 2010. Retrieved January 12, 2022.
- ^ Scudellari, Megan (March 2011). "Whistleblower protections for US government scientists flounder". Nature Medicine. 17 (3): 234. doi:10.1038/nm0311-234a. PMID 21383703. S2CID 205376958.
- ^ ethics.harvard.edu/people/paul-thacker
- ^ Thacker PD (November 2021). "Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer's vaccine trial". BMJ. 375: n2635. doi:10.1136/bmj.n2635. PMID 34728500.
A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported
- ^ Gorski, David (November 8, 2021). "What the heck happened to The BMJ?". Science-Based Medicine.
- ^ Clark, Cheryl (November 5, 2021). "Experts Blow Whistle on Alleged COVID Vaccine Whistleblower Claims". MedPage Today. Retrieved January 11, 2022.
- ^ "ABSW Awards 2022: The Finalists". Association of British Science Writers. Retrieved May 6, 2024.
- ^ Coombes, Rebecca (December 9, 2021). "Investigative journalist wins British Journalism Award for "expertly researched" BMJ series". The BMJ. 375: n3052. doi:10.1136/bmj.n3052. PMID 34887249.
- ^ Tobitt, Charlotte (December 8, 2021). "British Journalism Awards winners revealed for 2021". Press Gazette.
- ^ Freedlander, David (October 8, 2023). "RFK Jr.'s Ultimate Vanity Project". Politico.
- ^ "Fake news, science, and pseudo journalism". Sense about Science.
External links
[edit]
- Thacker's substack page
- Thacker interview. "Science Fiction", Exposé: America's Investigative Reports, PBS