Talk:Duncan & Miller Glass Company/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Aaron north (talk | contribs) |
m Fixing Lint errors from Wikipedia:Linter/Signature submissions (Task 31) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the review within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> |
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the review within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> |
||
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Aaron north|< |
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Aaron north|'''<span style="color:red;">Aaron</span> <span style="color:blue;">north</span>''']] ([[User talk:Aaron north|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Aaron_north|C]]) 02:12, 1 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
{{tick}} I have concluded my review. After some light copy-editing this is a fairly easy pass. [[User:Aaron north|< |
{{tick}} I have concluded my review. After some light copy-editing this is a fairly easy pass. [[User:Aaron north|'''<span style="color:red;">Aaron</span> <span style="color:blue;">north</span>''']] ([[User talk:Aaron north|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Aaron_north|C]]) 03:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
:'''[[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|GA]] review''' (see [[Wikipedia:What is a good article?|here]] for criteria) |
:'''[[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|GA]] review''' (see [[Wikipedia:What is a good article?|here]] for criteria) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
For this review, I am considering all sources to be reliable except the K and M antiques cite. This is just information written on some store-owner's web site, which is basically about as credible as a blog. However, that source claims that all their information came from what would probably be a credible secondary source, and nothing supported by this web cite is particularly questionable or controversial, so I'm calling the sources and citations good. It may be worthwhile to find a different source for those claims in the future. [[User:Aaron north|< |
For this review, I am considering all sources to be reliable except the K and M antiques cite. This is just information written on some store-owner's web site, which is basically about as credible as a blog. However, that source claims that all their information came from what would probably be a credible secondary source, and nothing supported by this web cite is particularly questionable or controversial, so I'm calling the sources and citations good. It may be worthwhile to find a different source for those claims in the future. [[User:Aaron north|'''<span style="color:red;">Aaron</span> <span style="color:blue;">north</span>''']] ([[User talk:Aaron north|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Aaron_north|C]]) 03:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
Regarding coverage, I think everything's basically there, there's not much to write about. I wondered about needing a section for the value of collecting duncan miller glass, but when I looked into it, it doesn't look unusually pricey. Pretty nice, but they apparently made a whole lot of everything they made. Also, the article is about the company, so collecting the glass itself would only be a minor part of this article. [[User:Aaron north|< |
Regarding coverage, I think everything's basically there, there's not much to write about. I wondered about needing a section for the value of collecting duncan miller glass, but when I looked into it, it doesn't look unusually pricey. Pretty nice, but they apparently made a whole lot of everything they made. Also, the article is about the company, so collecting the glass itself would only be a minor part of this article. [[User:Aaron north|'''<span style="color:red;">Aaron</span> <span style="color:blue;">north</span>''']] ([[User talk:Aaron north|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Aaron_north|C]]) 03:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
The following is a list of concerns that I believe '''need to be satisfied''' to pass review. If you disagree or believe I made an error, please point that out too. [[User:Aaron north|< |
The following is a list of concerns that I believe '''need to be satisfied''' to pass review. If you disagree or believe I made an error, please point that out too. [[User:Aaron north|'''<span style="color:red;">Aaron</span> <span style="color:blue;">north</span>''']] ([[User talk:Aaron north|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Aaron_north|C]]) 03:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
* nothing found |
* nothing found |
||
The following is a list of other thoughts or suggestions to improve the article. It is '''not necessary''' to satisfy these points to meet the GA criteria. [[User:Aaron north|< |
The following is a list of other thoughts or suggestions to improve the article. It is '''not necessary''' to satisfy these points to meet the GA criteria. [[User:Aaron north|'''<span style="color:red;">Aaron</span> <span style="color:blue;">north</span>''']] ([[User talk:Aaron north|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Aaron_north|C]]) 03:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
* It is not necessary at all to cite the same source over and over again after each sentence in a paragraph. For example, if one source covers four consecutive sentences, you can just put it after that 4th consecutive sentence in the paragraph which uses that source. (You probably still need to re-cite if needed for non-consecutive sentences or for the next paragraph) Having a cite after every single sentence when it is not necessary gets to be a bit distracting. (when a reference runs to footnote #ab, that could be a sign that the cites can be consolidated!) This is merely a comment on possible excessive cites. Like the other notes in this section, this comment has no impact on the outcome of a GA review if you really want to cite every sentence. |
* It is not necessary at all to cite the same source over and over again after each sentence in a paragraph. For example, if one source covers four consecutive sentences, you can just put it after that 4th consecutive sentence in the paragraph which uses that source. (You probably still need to re-cite if needed for non-consecutive sentences or for the next paragraph) Having a cite after every single sentence when it is not necessary gets to be a bit distracting. (when a reference runs to footnote #ab, that could be a sign that the cites can be consolidated!) This is merely a comment on possible excessive cites. Like the other notes in this section, this comment has no impact on the outcome of a GA review if you really want to cite every sentence. |
||
Latest revision as of 11:43, 16 October 2024
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Aaron north (T/C) 02:12, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
I have concluded my review. After some light copy-editing this is a fairly easy pass. Aaron north (T/C) 03:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]For this review, I am considering all sources to be reliable except the K and M antiques cite. This is just information written on some store-owner's web site, which is basically about as credible as a blog. However, that source claims that all their information came from what would probably be a credible secondary source, and nothing supported by this web cite is particularly questionable or controversial, so I'm calling the sources and citations good. It may be worthwhile to find a different source for those claims in the future. Aaron north (T/C) 03:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Regarding coverage, I think everything's basically there, there's not much to write about. I wondered about needing a section for the value of collecting duncan miller glass, but when I looked into it, it doesn't look unusually pricey. Pretty nice, but they apparently made a whole lot of everything they made. Also, the article is about the company, so collecting the glass itself would only be a minor part of this article. Aaron north (T/C) 03:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
The following is a list of concerns that I believe need to be satisfied to pass review. If you disagree or believe I made an error, please point that out too. Aaron north (T/C) 03:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
- nothing found
The following is a list of other thoughts or suggestions to improve the article. It is not necessary to satisfy these points to meet the GA criteria. Aaron north (T/C) 03:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
- It is not necessary at all to cite the same source over and over again after each sentence in a paragraph. For example, if one source covers four consecutive sentences, you can just put it after that 4th consecutive sentence in the paragraph which uses that source. (You probably still need to re-cite if needed for non-consecutive sentences or for the next paragraph) Having a cite after every single sentence when it is not necessary gets to be a bit distracting. (when a reference runs to footnote #ab, that could be a sign that the cites can be consolidated!) This is merely a comment on possible excessive cites. Like the other notes in this section, this comment has no impact on the outcome of a GA review if you really want to cite every sentence.
- Is there a free or fair-use picture of all or any of the Duncan family members who started the company?