Talk:National Security Agency: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 10:59, 18 October 2024

FASCIA (database) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 19 July 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into National Security Agency. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the National Security Agency article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: 3 months

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

National Security Agency received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 4, 2023.

Cryptography: Computer science High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as High-importance).

United States: Government High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as High-importance).

Maryland: Baltimore Mid‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Baltimore Task Force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Politics: American High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as High-importance).

Espionage High‑importance

	National Security Agency is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mass surveillance High‑importance

	National Security Agency is within the scope of WikiProject Mass surveillance, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of mass surveillance and mass surveillance-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.Mass surveillanceWikipedia:WikiProject Mass surveillanceTemplate:WikiProject Mass surveillanceMass surveillance articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

We need to make new articles sometime soon

Somebody should start some articles called the Signals Intelligence Directorate and Research and Development Directorate RDD. I also think a third person should do the Information Assurance Directorate acr. (IAD). Going to need 3 teams to write three types of articles. Be able to distinguish between emblem, seal, and logo.

See *https://electrospaces.blogspot.com/2014/01/nsas-organizational-designations.html which contains twelve additional cited sources. Also see *https://nsa.gov1.info/dni/ which many slideshows. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Personisgaming (talk • contribs) 22:06, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Prism-slide-8.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The ACLU and the NSA may soon square off in the Supreme Court — over Wikipedia

Include in article?

National Security Agency and American Civil Liberties Union

The ACLU and the NSA may soon square off in the Supreme Court — over Wikipedia - The NSA and the scope of state secrets privilege may be in front of the Supreme Court next term. Source: https://www.grid.news/story/technology/2022/09/27/the-aclu-and-the-nsa-may-soon-square-off-in-the-supreme-court-over-wikipedia/ September 27, 2022

"The Wikimedia Foundation, the organization that runs Wikipedia, last month asked the (Supreme Court) to hear arguments on its lawsuit over the National Security Agency’s warrantless surveillance of Americans’ international phone and email communications. The organization, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, has been fighting the NSA in court over such “upstream surveillance” for the past seven years." ... "Wikimedia contends that given this surveillance, it cannot ensure the confidentiality of the tens of millions of people who read, edit and communicate about Wikipedia, one of the largest repositories of human information to ever exist."

Aeryn Palmer, legal director of compliance at the Wikimedia Foundation, said...“When we think about what we might be collecting from anyone who visits the site, when we think about how we do research with our readers or with our contributors to better understand what sorts of features they might like to see and how they want the projects to evolve, we’re continually thinking about how we can best protect their privacy,”

May1787 (talk) 12:20, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Include in article?" - sure, why not. - wolf 16:52, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like suitable content. North8000 (talk) 18:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

Propose merging National Security Agency academic publications into National Security Agency. The lack of multiple instances of WP:SIGCOV of the academic journals makes the content better contextualized and better fitting on the agency's main page. Longhornsg (talk) 19:00, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support - The article is short enough to be covered in this article, and short enough to be considered a stub. I suggest we merge Tropwine (talk) 10:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I agree with the motives for merging, the other article is very small and could definitely be integrated into this one. Tylermack999 (talk) 15:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral I'm neutral on the idea. When it comes to a sub article with boring details which independent sources don't cover, I would never delete an article solely for lack of such. But this looks like it would fit fine into the higher level article. North8000 (talk) 20:05, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- to my knowledge we do not split this out for any other USG agency, and they're lacking sufficient coverage and independent notability to merit individual articles. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 02:58, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So it's been open for almost 8 weeks and 4 of the 4 respondents say "let's merge" and so I think that there is a consensus for merging. I don't think that there is a consensus to say "should not be allowed to be an article" but IMO that's a moot point. North8000 (talk) 20:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{afd-merged-from|FASCIA (database)|FASCIA (database)|19 July 2024}}
-{{Talk header|archive_age=90|archive_units=days|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}}
+{{Merged-from|National Security Agency academic publications|18 October 2024}}
-{{Vital article|topic=Society|level=5|class=C}}
+{{Talk header}}
-{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
+{{American English}}
-{{WikiProject Cryptography |class=C |importance=High}}
+{{Old peer review|archive=1}}
-{{WikiProject United States |class=C |importance=High |USGov=yes |USGov-importance=High}}
+{{On this day|date1=2023-11-04|oldid1=1183226023}}
-{{WikiProject Maryland |class=C |importance=mid |Baltimore=yes|Baltimore-importance=Mid}}
-{{WikiProject Politics |class=C |importance=high}}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
-{{WikiProject Intelligence |class=C |importance=high}}
+{{WikiProject Cryptography|importance=High}}
-{{WikiProject Mass surveillance|class=C|importance=High}}
+{{WikiProject United States|importance=High |USGov=yes |USGov-importance=High}}
+{{WikiProject Maryland|importance=mid |Baltimore=yes|Baltimore-importance=Mid}}
+{{WikiProject Politics|importance=high|American=y|American-importance=high}}
+{{WikiProject Espionage|importance=high}}
+{{WikiProject Mass surveillance|importance=High}}
 }}
 {{To do}}
-{{oldpeerreview|archive=1}}
 {{Refideas
 |free=yes
@@ Line 38: / Line 41: @@
 Also see *https://nsa.gov1.info/dni/ which many slideshows.  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Personisgaming|Personisgaming]] ([[User talk:Personisgaming#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Personisgaming|contribs]]) 22:06, 27 June 2019
 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-== why does the "list of NSA controversies" redirect to the NSA page? ==
-n [[User:Greek Architect|Greek Architect]] ([[User talk:Greek Architect|talk]]) 15:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
-:IMO that page and title shouldn't exist even is a redirect. A inappropriate title has no relevant target location. <b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 17:09, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
-::{{Yo|Greek Architect}} That's an opinion, not an answer. There was a "NSA controveries" section header on the page, with a list of same (see: "Constitutionality, legality and privacy questions regarding operations"). As the page is aleady [[WP:TOOBIG|too large]], and that section is also quite large, it was [[WP:SPLIT|split]] off to the new page. A couple editors complained and one undid the removal for the split on this end, but still left the page intact on that end, creating a problematic [[WP:CFORK|fork]]. The content on that page was then removed and the page redirected back here. For more info, see the section: [[#Removal of Content from Main Article]], up above. Hope this helps. - ''[[User:Thewolfchild|<span style="color: black">wolf</span>]]'' 21:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
-:::{{ping|Thewolfchild}} {{ping|Greek Architect}} Wolf gave a better and more informative answer than me.  I was more thinking about an answer for "where should "list of NSA controversies" redirect to?"   I did not look into the history of the redirect and.  I didn't realize that it was created during the recent attempted split; if I did I would have discussed it differently and more diplomatically. My apologies to Wolf on that. Sincerely, <b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 22:25, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
-::::Bah, it's all good, you're still on my Christmas card list. - ''[[User:Thewolfchild|<span style="color: black">wolf</span>]]'' 05:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-:::::Thanks! <b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 14:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
-Sorry, I just saw the answers but that explains it very well, thank you :)  [[User:Greek Architect|Greek Architect]] ([[User talk:Greek Architect|talk]]) 20:48, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 == A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
@@ Line 73: / Line 64: @@
 Sounds like suitable content.  <b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 18:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
+== Merge proposal ==
+Propose merging [[National Security Agency academic publications]] into [[National Security Agency]]. The lack of multiple instances of [[WP:SIGCOV]] of the academic journals makes the content better contextualized and better fitting on the agency's main page. [[User:Longhornsg|Longhornsg]] ([[User talk:Longhornsg|talk]]) 19:00, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
+:'''Support''' - The article is short enough to be covered in this article, and short enough to be considered a stub. I suggest we merge [[User:Tropwine|Tropwine]] ([[User talk:Tropwine|talk]]) 10:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
+:'''Support''' - I agree with the motives for merging, the other article is very small and could definitely be integrated into this one. [[User:Tylermack999|Tylermack999]] ([[User talk:Tylermack999|talk]]) 15:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
+:'''Neutral''' I'm neutral on the idea.  When it comes to a sub article with boring details which independent sources don't cover, I would never delete an article solely for lack of such.   But this looks like it would fit fine into the higher level article. <b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 20:05, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
+:'''Support''' -- to my knowledge we do not split this out for any other USG agency, and they're lacking sufficient coverage and independent notability to merit individual articles. [[User:Swatjester|<span style="color:red">⇒</span>]][[User_talk:Swatjester|<span style="font-family:Serif"><span style="color:black">SWAT</span><span style="color:goldenrod">Jester</span></span>]] <small><sup>Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!</sup></small> 02:58, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
+So it's been open for almost 8 weeks and 4 of the 4 respondents say "let's merge" and so I think that there is a consensus for merging.  I don't think that there is a consensus to say "should not be allowed to be an article" but IMO that's a moot point. <b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 20:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)