Jump to content

Talk:Lion-man: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. The article is listed in the level 5 page: Sculpture. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: importance.
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Germany|class=start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Archaeology|class=|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Germany|importance=low}}
{{Visual arts|class=|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Archaeology|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Visual arts}}
}}

How's it the " oldest-known zoomorphic (animal-shaped) sculpture in the world, and the oldest-known uncontested example of figurative art"
Sorry please take this down. If I start giving you 10000 examples of more older animal shaped cultures and figurative arts we have in India ,that itself will take years. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2603:900A:1C0A:1457:7463:38A4:21B0:C82|2603:900A:1C0A:1457:7463:38A4:21B0:C82]] ([[User talk:2603:900A:1C0A:1457:7463:38A4:21B0:C82#top|talk]]) 17:10, 28 April 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Even older ==
== Even older ==
Line 13: Line 18:


This looked like a typo to me, but if "presence deity" actually means something, maybe someone can explain it more clearly. [[User:Peboki|Peboki]] ([[User talk:Peboki|talk]]) 17:57, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
This looked like a typo to me, but if "presence deity" actually means something, maybe someone can explain it more clearly. [[User:Peboki|Peboki]] ([[User talk:Peboki|talk]]) 17:57, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

== Other Palaeolithic hybrids ==
I note the article has the following text: "The sculpture shares certain similarities with French cave wall paintings, which also show hybrid creatures." - can anyone provide references for this? Thank you <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/78.86.144.126|78.86.144.126]] ([[User talk:78.86.144.126|talk]]) 10:05, 19 February 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Narashima ==
I don't get why the Indian deity N. is listed under "see also". There's no connection other than the lion head. There are other human-lion hybrids in art/religion/myth/stories around the world. If this is really interesting to anyone, perhaps there should be an article that lists all those human-lion figures and that links to the Hohlenstein lion-man, Narashima, Sekhmet, and the others.[[User:Big Bene|Big Bene]] ([[User talk:Big Bene|talk]]) 08:18, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

The idol is related to narsimha according to Isckon. [[User:Anubhav Gangwar|Anubhav Gangwar]] ([[User talk:Anubhav Gangwar|talk]]) 09:23, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

== The oldest known European God ==

Shamans do not pretend they are shamans. Shamans do not pretend they are humans wearing an animal mask. The mask is part of what they are. This head depicts a Lion-god and not a Lion-man!

:If you want to change the article or the name, you must find [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] - academic ones- that user your preferred name and demonstrate that the usage you prefer is more common, see [[WP:COMMONAME]]. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 12:42, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

== I understand that this is a representation of a medicine man/woman ==

I do not read any discussion about this hypothesis.
Cheers
[[User:Renebach|Renebach]] ([[User talk:Renebach|talk]]) 17:08, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
:One of many theories. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 18:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

== Article in ''Current World Archaeology'' ==

There is an interesting article in ''Current World Archaeology'', issue 100, 19 March 2020.
[https://www.world-archaeology.com/issues/the-bear-necessities/]
Elle Clifford and [[Paul Bahn]] argue that the ‘Lion Man’ in fact represents a bear, and may have been made as a child’s toy. [[User:Sweet6970|Sweet6970]] ([[User talk:Sweet6970|talk]]) 10:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

==To revise==
To revise in this article: the statement that this is "the oldest-known uncontested example of figurative art" -- the mural in the [[Caves in the Maros-Pangkep karst]] (in Sulawesi, Indonesia) dates to c. 43,900 years ago. [[Special:Contributions/173.88.246.138|173.88.246.138]] ([[User talk:173.88.246.138|talk]]) 01:18, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
:Wording slightly revised. [[User:Sweet6970|Sweet6970]] ([[User talk:Sweet6970|talk]]) 14:03, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:28, 20 October 2024

How's it the " oldest-known zoomorphic (animal-shaped) sculpture in the world, and the oldest-known uncontested example of figurative art" Sorry please take this down. If I start giving you 10000 examples of more older animal shaped cultures and figurative arts we have in India ,that itself will take years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:900A:1C0A:1457:7463:38A4:21B0:C82 (talk) 17:10, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even older

[edit]

A month ago more parts of the lion-human figure were found. Archaeologists now say the figure is 35,000 to 40,000 years old! http://www.swr.de/swr4/bw/regional/schwaben/-/id=259568/nid=259568/did=7920218/1tp2tvh/index.html (in German) 178.201.23.62 (talk) 23:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"This article has been rated as LOW-IMPORTANCE on the project's" Yeah we got bigger priorities like Britney Spears.72.201.19.165 (talk) 07:30, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

presence deity

[edit]

This looked like a typo to me, but if "presence deity" actually means something, maybe someone can explain it more clearly. Peboki (talk) 17:57, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Other Palaeolithic hybrids

[edit]

I note the article has the following text: "The sculpture shares certain similarities with French cave wall paintings, which also show hybrid creatures." - can anyone provide references for this? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.144.126 (talk) 10:05, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Narashima

[edit]

I don't get why the Indian deity N. is listed under "see also". There's no connection other than the lion head. There are other human-lion hybrids in art/religion/myth/stories around the world. If this is really interesting to anyone, perhaps there should be an article that lists all those human-lion figures and that links to the Hohlenstein lion-man, Narashima, Sekhmet, and the others.Big Bene (talk) 08:18, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The idol is related to narsimha according to Isckon. Anubhav Gangwar (talk) 09:23, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The oldest known European God

[edit]

Shamans do not pretend they are shamans. Shamans do not pretend they are humans wearing an animal mask. The mask is part of what they are. This head depicts a Lion-god and not a Lion-man!

If you want to change the article or the name, you must find reliable sources - academic ones- that user your preferred name and demonstrate that the usage you prefer is more common, see WP:COMMONAME. Doug Weller talk 12:42, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that this is a representation of a medicine man/woman

[edit]

I do not read any discussion about this hypothesis. Cheers Renebach (talk) 17:08, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One of many theories. Johnbod (talk) 18:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article in Current World Archaeology

[edit]

There is an interesting article in Current World Archaeology, issue 100, 19 March 2020. [1] Elle Clifford and Paul Bahn argue that the ‘Lion Man’ in fact represents a bear, and may have been made as a child’s toy. Sweet6970 (talk) 10:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To revise

[edit]

To revise in this article: the statement that this is "the oldest-known uncontested example of figurative art" -- the mural in the Caves in the Maros-Pangkep karst (in Sulawesi, Indonesia) dates to c. 43,900 years ago. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 01:18, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wording slightly revised. Sweet6970 (talk) 14:03, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]