Talk:Tracy Chapman: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Hiatus between New Beginning and Telling Stories: new section |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 7 WikiProject templates. The article is listed in the level 5 page: Folk. Tag: |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Skip to talk}} |
{{Skip to talk}} |
||
{{Talk header}} |
|||
{{Talk header|age= 90|bot= lowercase sigmabot III|units= days|minthreadsleft= 2}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=C|vital |
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=C|vital=yes|listas=Chapman, Tracy|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Biography|musician-priority=Mid|musician-work-group=yes}} |
{{WikiProject Biography|musician-priority=Mid|musician-work-group=yes}} |
||
{{WikiProject Cleveland|importance=Low}} |
{{WikiProject Cleveland|importance=Low}} |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|minthreadsleft = 2 |
|minthreadsleft = 2 |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Baby Can I Hold You in the lead == |
|||
Hey guys, do you all think [[Baby Can I Hold You]] should be included in the lead as one of Tracy’s best known singles, alongside [[Fast Car]] and [[Give Me One Reason]]? I started to add it, but thought I’d see what everyone else thought first. I hear it on my local soft rock station from time to time, then it was in the news with the whole [[Nicki Minaj]] copyright lawsuit a few years back. It’s definitely notable and a fan favorite, and Tracy’s next highest charting single, just missing the Top 40, and it did hit the Top 20 on the AC charts. What do you guys think? It’s cool if not, but it’s certainly worth considering! [[User:Cryptkeeperfun|Cryptkeeperfun]] ([[User talk:Cryptkeeperfun|talk]]) 13:57, 1 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:Naaaah, I think the songs already there are her best-known *by far* internationally (in terms of the number of high placements in charts) and they're enough here. Adding any more could start a slippery slope towards the list growing to mammoth proportions. '''[[User:Graham87|Graham]]'''[[User talk:Graham87|<span style="color: green;">87</span>]] 15:31, 1 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::Good point, thanks for the feedback! [[User:Cryptkeeperfun|Cryptkeeperfun]] ([[User talk:Cryptkeeperfun|talk]]) 16:15, 1 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Personal life == |
== Personal life == |
||
Line 34: | Line 28: | ||
Every time I try to reinsert the detail about the 5-year hiatus between New Beginning and Telling Stories it gets reverted, just because there’s “no source”. Really? All you have to do is look at the time period between the release of the two records to see. [[Special:Contributions/76.104.229.144|76.104.229.144]] ([[User talk:76.104.229.144|talk]]) 05:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC) |
Every time I try to reinsert the detail about the 5-year hiatus between New Beginning and Telling Stories it gets reverted, just because there’s “no source”. Really? All you have to do is look at the time period between the release of the two records to see. [[Special:Contributions/76.104.229.144|76.104.229.144]] ([[User talk:76.104.229.144|talk]]) 05:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
:Looking at the time period is [[WP:OR|original research]]. We need a source that actually calls it a hiatus. That's just how Wikipedia is. [[User:Graham87|Graham87]] ([[User talk:Graham87|talk]]) 08:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::In [[Special:Diff/1225897787|this edit summary]], the link I added to my older edit summary went to the wrong place; it should've gone to [[Special:Diff/1215347148|this diff]]. [[User:Graham87|Graham87]] ([[User talk:Graham87|talk]]) 15:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::“Bad content often stays here for a while”? So just because it was unsourced makes it bad content?? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2601:602:77f:5a40:31d8:af94:2897:32f|2601:602:77f:5a40:31d8:af94:2897:32f]] ([[User talk:2601:602:77f:5a40:31d8:af94:2897:32f#top|talk]]) 04:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|||
::::Yeah, it basically does. [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] is an important guideline here. [[User:Graham87|Graham87]] ([[User talk:Graham87|talk]]) 07:02, 31 May 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:26, 20 October 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tracy Chapman article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Personal life
[edit]I’m surprised that there isn’t anything interesting about Tracy Chapman’s personal life except her sexual orientation. 71.223.45.22 (talk) 15:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Hiatus between New Beginning and Telling Stories
[edit]Every time I try to reinsert the detail about the 5-year hiatus between New Beginning and Telling Stories it gets reverted, just because there’s “no source”. Really? All you have to do is look at the time period between the release of the two records to see. 76.104.229.144 (talk) 05:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Looking at the time period is original research. We need a source that actually calls it a hiatus. That's just how Wikipedia is. Graham87 (talk) 08:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- In this edit summary, the link I added to my older edit summary went to the wrong place; it should've gone to this diff. Graham87 (talk) 15:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- “Bad content often stays here for a while”? So just because it was unsourced makes it bad content?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:77f:5a40:31d8:af94:2897:32f (talk) 04:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, it basically does. Wikipedia:Citing sources is an important guideline here. Graham87 (talk) 07:02, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- “Bad content often stays here for a while”? So just because it was unsourced makes it bad content?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:77f:5a40:31d8:af94:2897:32f (talk) 04:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- In this edit summary, the link I added to my older edit summary went to the wrong place; it should've gone to this diff. Graham87 (talk) 15:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- C-Class vital articles in People
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (musicians) articles
- Mid-importance biography (musicians) articles
- Musicians work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Cleveland articles
- Low-importance Cleveland articles
- WikiProject Cleveland articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Ohio articles
- Low-importance Ohio articles
- WikiProject Ohio articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class African diaspora articles
- Top-importance African diaspora articles
- WikiProject African diaspora articles
- C-Class Roots music articles
- Mid-importance Roots music articles
- WikiProject Roots music articles
- C-Class WikiProject Women articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women articles
- C-Class Women in music articles
- Mid-importance Women in music articles
- WikiProject Women in Music articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report