Talk:Michael J. Fox: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Seasider53 (talk | contribs) →Fox's children: Reply |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. The article is listed in the level 5 page: United States. Tag: |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| topic = film|otd1date=2023-06-09|otd1oldid=1159053940 |
| topic = film|otd1date=2023-06-09|otd1oldid=1159053940 |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=GA|vital |
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=GA|vital=yes|listas=Fox, Michael J|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Biography|filmbio-work-group=yes|filmbio-priority=high}} |
{{WikiProject Biography|filmbio-work-group=yes|filmbio-priority=high}} |
||
{{WikiProject Canada|ab=yes|bc=yes|importance=low}} |
{{WikiProject Canada|ab=yes|bc=yes|importance=low}} |
Latest revision as of 05:44, 20 October 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Michael J. Fox article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Michael J. Fox has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
Fox did not return to acting
[edit]Several users keep randomly adding in 2024 to present in his years active section in his infobox, I removed it for a reason because it was added in without a reliable source to confirm it. I’m gonna ask you guy’s politely to please stop adding it back without a source first. It even states in his career section that he’s retired from acting. 2607:FB91:1CCB:C9FE:5DC1:9447:C644:FFE0 (talk) 01:28, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Fox's children
[edit]I’m obviously missing something. Why are his children’s names (especially birthdays!) notable? Seasider53 (talk) 23:52, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- They are notable because they are his children. Not his distant relatives or best friend or something. His literal children. This alone makes them notable enough to have their names in the article.
- And their birthdays are, if anything, more notable. Even if you don't want to put their names in the article, you could still put their birthdays in. Usually, whenever a celebrity has a young child, we only state their birthdays and not their names, usually to protect their privacy. But seeing as Fox's children are grown, it would be understandable to name them.
- This is what I think, but I'm not infallible, and I want to see what other Wikipedians will say too. Thanks, CallieCrewmanAuthor (talk) 21:47, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- My preference always tends towards removal of names in these cases. As per WP:BLPNAME; "The presumption in favor of privacy is strong in the case of family members of articles' subjects and other loosely involved, otherwise low-profile persons". Unless related family members have become notable in their own right, or their parents have actively placed them in the public eye, there is little justification for naming them. Their existence, and possibly date of birth, however, has significance to the article subject.--Escape Orbit (Talk) 09:25, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'd say just year of birth is preferable in these instances. Month and day seems like unnecessary details. Seasider53 (talk) 09:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- My preference always tends towards removal of names in these cases. As per WP:BLPNAME; "The presumption in favor of privacy is strong in the case of family members of articles' subjects and other loosely involved, otherwise low-profile persons". Unless related family members have become notable in their own right, or their parents have actively placed them in the public eye, there is little justification for naming them. Their existence, and possibly date of birth, however, has significance to the article subject.--Escape Orbit (Talk) 09:25, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- Biography articles of living people
- GA-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- GA-Class vital articles in People
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- High-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- GA-Class British Columbia articles
- Low-importance British Columbia articles
- GA-Class Alberta articles
- Low-importance Alberta articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia articles that use Canadian English
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report