Jump to content

Talk:Gloria Steinem: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mid importance
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 7 WikiProject templates. The article is listed in the level 5 page: United States.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header|search=yes|archive_age=90|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}}
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{Article history
{{Article history
|currentstatus=GA
|currentstatus=GA
Line 22: Line 22:
|action3oldid=635862494
|action3oldid=635862494
|otd1date=2017-03-25|otd1oldid=772089390
|otd1date=2017-03-25|otd1oldid=772089390
|otd2date=2024-03-25|otd2oldid=1215496973
}}
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|blp=y|class=GA|vital=yes|living=y|listas=Steinem, Gloria|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|collapsed=yes|blp=y|vital=yes|listas=Steinem, Gloria|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|politician-work-group=y|politician-priority=Low}}
{{WikiProject Biography|politician-work-group=y|politician-priority=Low}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|OH=yes|OH-importance=}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|OH=yes|OH-importance=}}
{{WikiProject Feminism|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Feminism|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Journalism}}
{{WikiProject Journalism |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Women writers|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Women writers|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Jewish Women |importance=Low}}
}}
}}

{{Annual readership|200}}
{{Annual readership|200}}


Line 53: Line 54:


Is anyone interested in working on this article? If not, it might be sent to GAR. The user who nominated this article for GA status seems to have vanished so I don't know who to ping to notify them. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 17:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Is anyone interested in working on this article? If not, it might be sent to GAR. The user who nominated this article for GA status seems to have vanished so I don't know who to ping to notify them. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 17:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

== Is it appropriate to do her introduction as a feminist without mentioning that she was an state asset... ==

Is it appropriate to do her introduction as a feminist without mentioning that she was an state asset to separate feminism from class issues? Should that not take precedent on the hierarchy of information of her identity? [[User:Maosid|Maosid]] ([[User talk:Maosid|talk]]) 15:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:28, 20 October 2024

Good articleGloria Steinem has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 2, 2014Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 22, 2014Good article nomineeListed
December 9, 2014Featured article candidateNot promoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 25, 2017, and March 25, 2024.
Current status: Good article


GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article might not meet the GA criteria anymore for the following reasons:

  • The election support section stops at 2016, and does not comment on 2020 or the upcoming election.
  • There are many uncited sentences and paragraphs
  • There are many short, one sentence paragraphs, especially in the Activism section

Is anyone interested in working on this article? If not, it might be sent to GAR. The user who nominated this article for GA status seems to have vanished so I don't know who to ping to notify them. Z1720 (talk) 17:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it appropriate to do her introduction as a feminist without mentioning that she was an state asset...

[edit]

Is it appropriate to do her introduction as a feminist without mentioning that she was an state asset to separate feminism from class issues? Should that not take precedent on the hierarchy of information of her identity? Maosid (talk) 15:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]