Jump to content

Talk:Coretta Scott King: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
GreenC bot (talk | contribs)
Bots
2,517,471 edits
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
Bots
7,064,940 edits
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 9 WikiProject templates. The article is listed in the level 5 page: United States. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: importance.
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|living=no|listas=King, Coretta Scott|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Biography |living=no |class=B |politician-priority=mid |politician-work-group=yes |listas=King, Coretta Scott}}
{{WikiProject Biography |politician-priority=mid |politician-work-group=yes }}
{{WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism|class=B|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject African diaspora |class=B |importance=High}}
{{WikiProject African diaspora |importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Alabama |class=B}}
{{WikiProject Alabama }}
{{WikiProject LGBT studies |class=B}}
{{WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies}}
{{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) |class=B |importance=high|atlanta=yes|atlanta-importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) |importance=high|atlanta=yes|atlanta-importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Women's History |class=B |importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Women's History |importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Women |class=b |importance=}}
{{WikiProject Women }}
{{WikiProject Civil Rights Movement |class=B |importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Civil Rights Movement |importance=High}}
}}
}}
{{OnThisDay|date1=2019-04-27|oldid1=894393403}}
{{OnThisDay|date1=2019-04-27|oldid1=894393403}}
{{Archive box|[[/Archive 1]]- 2004-2007 discussions}}
{{Archive box|[[/Archive 1]]- 2004-2007 discussions<br>[[/Archive 2]]- 2008-2023 discussions}}
{{Broken anchors|links=
{{Vital article|level=5|topic=People|subpage=Activists|class=B}}
* <nowiki>[[Holism#Holistic healing|holistic]]</nowiki> The anchor (#Holistic healing) has been [[Special:Diff/40144190|deleted by other users]] before. <!-- {"title":"Holistic healing","appear":{"revid":24954766,"parentid":24887027,"timestamp":"2005-10-07T06:18:32Z","removed_section_titles":[],"added_section_titles":["Holistic healing"]},"disappear":{"revid":40144190,"parentid":39022484,"timestamp":"2006-02-18T13:38:58Z","removed_section_titles":["Responses to holism","Holistic healing"],"added_section_titles":["Holism in philosophy","Holism in medicine"]}} -->

}}
== Question: Why does my article on Coretta keep getting deleted from "External Links"? ==

I posted it shortly after her death and linked in here. I recently noticed it missing and relinked it a few days ago, only to see it gone again tonight. Is there a process of approval I'm not following? The piece is (I think, and hope) well researched, passionate, and conscientous. All of the visual and text borrowing falls within fair use, and the sources are linked and referenced. Sorry if I'm betraying ignorance about Wikipedia etiquette here, or about anything else. For reference, the article is this: "You Can't Do All of It By Yourself"
http://blogs.citypages.com/pscholtes/2006/02/coretta_scott_k.php
Pete Scholtes, petescholtes "at" gmail.com (2/1/08)
:Wikipedia does not consider blogs reliable sources. They are rarely, if ever used for article content, including external links. [[User:Bookkeeperoftheoccult|<span style="color:black">'''''The Bookkeeper'''''</span>]] [[User talk:Bookkeeperoftheoccult|<small><span style="color:gray">(<sub>'''''of the Occult'''''</sub>)</span></small>]] 08:37, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

== She's part Native American why isn't this stated in the article she not just African American ==

Hi! I really enjoy how the articles are very thorough most of the time it really helps with research, but how come none of her native american heritage is mentioned at all?? She even physically shows traits that are native american and not african american? So is this article being biased or has this fact been over looked as with many people who are classified as african americans. I looked the Black Indians article which has helped me understand some of these issues even better, and explains why so many of my friends look different physically. Thank You for your time.[[Special:Contributions/98.206.116.222|98.206.116.222]] ([[User talk:98.206.116.222|talk]]) 06:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
:Information in articles has to be sourced to a reliable source, and so far no editor has come across a reliable source claiming such. Basing our opinion of her heritage on how she looked would be [[WP:OR|original research]], so we cannot include the information on the basis of that opinion. If you'd like to include this information you'll need to find a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] that discusses it. [[User:Natalie Erin|Natalie]] ([[User talk:Natalie Erin|talk]]) 13:58, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Well isn't that biased? You can write she's AFrican American but you can't write that she's also Native American? Why is it such a big fight to acknowledge a person's Native American heritage, but not their African? Isn't that unfair? I understand that she fought for civil rights but that doesn't mean she was all black, and what if she had more native heritage then black, would people get mad?[[Special:Contributions/98.206.116.222|98.206.116.222]] ([[User talk:98.206.116.222|talk]]) 21:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
:It doesn't matter what the actual subject matter is - everything has to be documented with reliable sources. We can write that she's African American because that's ''supported by actual sources'', but you haven't actually provided any evidence that King is actually part Native American, other than your personal assessment of her appearance. I can't see how this is biased or unfair at all - every claim has to be supported. Isn't that kind of the definition of fair? [[User:Natalie Erin|Natalie]] ([[User talk:Natalie Erin|talk]]) 22:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Well like Natalie has stated it needs to be cited, and it is far more easier to find a source stating that a person is African American than to find one that talks about any other heritage they have. For example: [[Zoe Saldana]] is Dominican-American but because of her complection and the roles she has played in movies some people believe that she is African American when she has no African American ancestry, but if there was no references on her Dominican heritage the odds are someone would have put that she is African American. So to make things clear it isn't biased it just the plan simple fact that it is hard finding sources on a person's full heritage let alone Native American. If you have interest in African-Native American people check out [[Black Indians]] there are several notable people that are listed and it was hard just to get their ancestral history.[[User:Mcelite|Mcelite]] ([[User talk:Mcelite|talk]]) 02:55, 14 March 2008 (UTC)mcelite

* Clearly Mrs King identified herself as Black (or Negro), as did those around her. That fact is clearly significant given the events of her life. If there are verifiable sources documenting her ethnic background in more detail, or even notable writings describing her appearance as unusual, those may be worth a small mention. But even then, any analysis or speculation about the "meaning" of something which was not under consideration during her life would go well beyond the scope of an encyclopedia unless it became the subject of a notable public debate. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] ([[User talk:Dystopos|talk]]) 03:17, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

== Vandalism I can't remove ==


At the first paragraph it has the gibberish: "She is like the beautiful, lovely wife of Martin Luther King Jr."

I can't seem to see that in the "edit this page" section.

Could somebody remove this and explain here how they removed it? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/202.182.91.94|202.182.91.94]] ([[User talk:202.182.91.94|talk]]) 21:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Relevance and speculation in "longevity" section ==

The inclusion of the "Longevity" section seems a bit irrelevant. Though she may have died younger than some members of her family, 78 is not a remarkably short lifetime. Even if it is deemed relevant to Caretta Scott King's page, it is entirely speculative. Longevity of a person is obviously a much more complicated issue than can be explained by stress and the ages of close relatives. I am worried that the section implies a stronger correlation between longevity and genetics than actually exists. I feel like a page on longevity in humans in general would be a more appropriate and well-equipped place to address this "nature vs. nurture" issue.
:You are correct. I'm amazed it sat there for so long. I have removed it. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|Have a gorilla]] 22:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

::A comparison is never a bad thing. The emphasis is on the fact of her public life. Her parents did much physical work and lived to truly old ages (both were in their 90's at their deaths), alas, King did not enjoy longevity and in fact did not survive either parent by a full decade. Her siblings came from a similar gene pattern as she and both have attained a higher age and are in better health than she was. At 78, a person should have several years of productivity remaining which is what seems to me the reason her death was deemed premature. (UTC) 03:12, 31 January 2009

:::Except it's not just that. You are also inserting your opinion, "Her brother Obie is currently 78 and in better health than she was at the same age. Factors related to stress, along with her cancer probably contributed to her death at only 78." That needs a source and I can't really see why comparing the length of her life to others is anything but trivia. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|Have a gorilla]] 13:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

::::It is true (not opinion) her siblings are in better health than she was, and their ages are 78 and 83. That part should be deleted. However, it is unusual for parents to live to their 90's have an offspring that never smoked, drank or did drugs and was a vegan to not even reach her eighth decade. It would be one thing to compare the length of her life to a non-relative but all the people mentioned are close relatives. I find it highly unusual that she only reached 78 (the majority of people today live far longer) and do believe that the stresses and demands of public life contributed to her fairly short lifespan. 01:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

:::::I'm not disagreeing about the ages. You can't say in the article that that it was stress and cancer that contributed to her death without quoting a source. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|Have a gorilla]] 09:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

::::::A person who dies at any age has a cause of death but it is more questionable the younger the person is at death. It is natural to wonder, especially when a person's parent lives from (1899-1998) and they only lived (1927-2006), its not unusual to ask what caused such a premature death and it deserves explanation. 01:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

:::::::That's fine but you need a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|source]] rather than an editors opinion. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|Have a gorilla]] 09:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

::::::::It was stated in many of her obituaries, it was stated by her children, plenty of sources are made starting from the time of her death on 30 January 2006. 11:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/144.96.225.105|144.96.225.105]] ([[User talk:144.96.225.105|talk]]) </span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Then it should be easy for you to source something saying that her children/relatives believe her death was caused by whatever they suggest. If you read through the article it's possible to speculate that the treatment give at the rehabilitation center in Mexico contributed to her death. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|Have a gorilla]] 07:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

:The center likely did contribute to her death. They did not seem to know what to do. Bernice King stated that her mother moaned and groaned (nothing was done for King during this time) for hours before her death. The doctor did not really want to see her to begin with. She ultimately died from cardio-respiratory failure. This goes to show that even today, accidental deaths occur due to indifference on the doctor's part. 00:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/64.217.180.55|64.217.180.55]] ([[User talk:64.217.180.55|talk]]) </span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

::Content has been provided showing King's death was premature but has yet to be acknowledged. What does it take for one to believe a reliable, documented source? 12:33, 12 March 2009 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.92.124.121|68.92.124.121]] ([[User talk:68.92.124.121|talk]]) </span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Dubious text ==
I removed the following from the first paragraph:
: ... following Dr. King's death, Mrs. King was responsible for finding a new leader of the civil rights movement; when [[Josephine Baker]] and others turned down the leadership position, Mrs. King took on the mantle of leadership herself, remaining an important voice in American politics until her death in 2006 (Please note: There is absolutely no reference to Josephine Baker on page 363, the first page of the index, where "Baker" would appear, in Mrs. King's memoir, "My Life With Martin Luther King, Jr." New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, 1969. Nor is there any discussion whatsoever in her book of Mrs. King being "responsible for finding a new leader of the civil rights movement.").
It is not clear how this dispute should be resolved; but this talk page seems like a more appropriate venue for handling such issues. --[[User:Tenmei|Tenmei]] ([[User talk:Tenmei|talk]]) 13:29, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

== Picture ==
The picture used in this article is blurry and pixelated. If anyone has a better pic that can be used here it would be a big improvement for it to be added.

== Date of Death ==

Coretta Scott King's date of passing is January 30, 2006, not August. Please correct this.
[[Special:Contributions/173.242.78.122|173.242.78.122]] ([[User talk:173.242.78.122|talk]]) 16:58, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

:Done. I'm not sure why the lead listed her death in August. The article correctly gave her death in January further down in the article.[[User:4meter4|4meter4]] ([[User talk:4meter4|talk]]) 18:06, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

== LGBT Equality - only one reference? ==

Are there more references than just the one reference in this section? <br>[[User:Bay Area Native|Bay Area Native]] ([[User talk:Bay Area Native|talk]]) 21:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

== Dubious Quote Regarding JNF forrest ==

The article claims that Coretta Scott King's wrote a glowing endorsement of JNF's forest, planted in her honor. The glowing quote can be found on the JNF website.

This quote is clearly dubious in nature. According to JNF's site, the forest in question was planned and planted as a result of sections of forest which burned down in the Israel Lebanon War. The Israel-Lebanon war occurred in July/August of 2006. Coretta Scott King died in January of 2006. Hence there is absolutely no way she could have known about the forest being named after her, let alone comment on it. [[User:Poyani|Poyani]] ([[User talk:Poyani|talk]]) 18:17, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
The materiel is sourced. JNF notified her of the *intention* to plant a forest before it was done, and later, they chose to plant that forest in an area that burned in the war <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Top of the Tower|Top of the Tower]] ([[User talk:Top of the Tower|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Top of the Tower|contribs]]) 00:38, 10 May 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Profile picture change ==
I've always been somewhat disappointed that we have chosen to use the current image all this time, when I think others would benefit the article greatly. I have no problem with the size, though it is small and does hamper in my opinion what is otherwise a very good article about a very wonderful person. I do believe that we should change the image, preferably to something that displayed her in her prime. I propose around the time Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. passed or prior to that. [[User:Redsonjustin|Justin]] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 02:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Dexter's age ==

The article says MLK died on Dexter's 45th birthday. Clearly a typo. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/75.160.148.185|75.160.148.185]] ([[User talk:75.160.148.185|talk]]) 17:57, 20 January 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:The article said that Coretta died on her son's 45 birthday. Clearly not a typo. [[User:Informant16|Informant16]] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 00:18, 5 February 2014 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Syntax and Word Usage Problems ==

there are a lot of syntax and word usage problems in this long article. they can't be corrected by someone who does not know what word was intended. the author of this piece should correct them, they're distracting and confusing.
[[User:Purejuice|Purejuice]] ([[User talk:Purejuice|talk]]) 07:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

==Might want to mention explicitly in the lede that she was married to MLK. You don't get a sense of it the way it is worded now.[[Special:Contributions/96.51.16.28|96.51.16.28]] ([[User talk:96.51.16.28|talk]]) 02:56, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

== 99.38.233.74 Bad-faith edits to remove mentions of LGBT rights 12 May 2015 ==

IP-address user made 2 bad-faith edits to the lead and infobox to remove mentions of support for LGBT rights.

05:24, 12 May 2015 Deceitful edit description of "Fixed typo" (-16 bytes) to remove mention of Gay rights in occupation in infobox
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Coretta_Scott_King&diff=661990003&oldid=661860564 Differences link]
*Changed “[[Women's rights]],<S> [[Gay rights]],</S>”

05:26, 12 May 2015 Deceitful edit description of "Fixed typo" (-62 bytes) to remove 2 mentions of LGBT rights work in 2nd paragraph
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Coretta_Scott_King&diff=661990218&oldid=661990003 Differences link]
*Changed “[[Second-wave feminism|Women's Movement]]<S> and the [[LGBT rights]] movement</S>.”
*Changed “opposition to [[apartheid]]<S> and advocacy for LGBT rights</S>.”

The section "LGBT equality" and its refs clearly supports the deleted text sections, so I restored them.

I have no experience undoing vandalism, so I don't know if it should be reported somewhere&mdash;please inform if so.
<BR>&mdash; [[User:Mwr0|Mwr0]] ([[User talk:Mwr0|talk]]) 04:57, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Coretta Scott King]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=686447378 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060210124941/http://www.ala.org:80/ala/emiert/corettascottkingbookaward/abouttheawarda/cskabout.htm to http://www.ala.org/ala/emiert/corettascottkingbookaward/abouttheawarda/cskabout.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers. —[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 04:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

== "I still hear people say that I should not be talking about the rights of lesbian and gay people" ==

:The quote "I still hear people say that I should not be talking about the rights of lesbian and gay people...", is dated 2003 here and uncited. [https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Coretta_Scott_King Wikiquote dates it to 1998] and ascribes it to Reuters. [[User:Marnanel|Marnanel]] ([[User talk:Marnanel|talk]]) 13:34, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:2|one external link|2 external links}} on [[Coretta Scott King]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=748719730 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131214083751/http://www.atlantamagazine.com/features/2013/07/31/interview-bernice-king/page/2 to http://www.atlantamagazine.com/features/2013/07/31/interview-bernice-king/page/2
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150325223647/http://www.rooseveltinstitute.org/four-freedoms-awards to http://www.rooseveltinstitute.org/four-freedoms-awards

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 23:07, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:7|one external link|7 external links}} on [[Coretta Scott King]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=752357169 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131022164733/http://www.africanancestry.com:80/blog/category/reveals/ to http://www.africanancestry.com/blog/category/reveals/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081202042853/http://www.galegroup.com/free_resources/whm/bio/king_c_s.htm to http://www.galegroup.com/free_resources/whm/bio/king_c_s.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150423212117/http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/page/kin1int-1 to http://achievement.org/autodoc/page/kin1int-1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012021241/http://www.wagingpeace.org/menu/programs/youth-outreach/peace-heroes/king-coretta.htm to http://www.wagingpeace.org/menu/programs/youth-outreach/peace-heroes/king-coretta.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071019051447/http://www.newenglandconservatory.edu/alumni/alumni_profiles/profiles/king.htm to http://www.newenglandconservatory.edu/alumni/alumni_profiles/profiles/king.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011125306/http://www.thetaskforce.org/press/releases/pr917_013106 to http://www.thetaskforce.org/press/releases/pr917_013106
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070816154740/http://www.nbjcoalition.org:80/news/coretta-scott-king-retires.html to http://www.nbjcoalition.org/news/coretta-scott-king-retires.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 20:38, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

== re: Maternal Grandfather, Martin ==

I found the information regarding Coretta's Maternal Grandfather, Martin to be partially incorrect from my experience. Martin was not abandoned by his father, nor was he unacknowledged.

His father was Thomas McMurray of County Antrim, Ireland and came to the U.S. as a young man. Martin was born at a time later in his father's life, but still in the time of slavery. Thomas McMurray, who was employed as an Overseer, not slave-owner, claimed his son as his own, not wanting a child of his to be a slave, as the law would have it. Had he not done this, Martin would have become the property of Thomas' employer, the farmer who owned Martin's mother.

Thomas gave Martin his name (spelling it "McMurry" without the "a") and raised him to adolescence. Some years after the Emancipation, Martin's mother returned for him and Martin was asked if he wanted to go with his mother or stay with his father. His father told Martin that if he chose to go with his mother, that he (Thomas) would never see Martin again.

Martin chose to go with his mother. However, it is not certain that Martin never again saw his father.

This story was told by Martin to his first and oldest child, Emma McMurry, instilling a pride in his "Irishness" which she carried throughout her life. This, along with various customs, tales and information about Ireland which Martin learned as a result of being raised by his father Thomas, was also passed on.

SOURCE:

My paternal grandmother, Emma McMurry Jenkins.

[[User:Carol J. Jenkins|Carol J. Jenkins]] ([[User talk:Carol J. Jenkins|talk]]) 19:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Carol J. Jenkins[[User:Carol J. Jenkins|Carol J. Jenkins]] ([[User talk:Carol J. Jenkins|talk]]) 19:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

== How she was a leader ==

kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk. \ <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/12.52.247.67|12.52.247.67]] ([[User talk:12.52.247.67#top|talk]]) 18:09, 1 October 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Consistency problem with names ==

In this article, the last name "King" is sometimes used to refer to Coretta Scott King and sometimes to her husband, Martin Luther King Jr. Sometimes it is not clear which of them is being referred to, and sometimes it is only clear because of the pronouns used.

* Here's an example of a sentence referring to Coretta Scott King as simply "King": ''Two days after the integration of Montgomery's bus service, on December 23, a gunshot rang through the front door of the King home while King, her husband and Yolanda were asleep.''
* Here's an example of a sentence referring to her husband as simply "King": ''King played the tape in her presence, along with [[Andrew Young]], [[Ralph Abernathy]] and [[Joseph Lowery]]. Publicly, Mrs. King would say "I couldn't make much out of it, it was just a lot of mumbo-jumbo."<ref>Dyson, p. 217.</ref> The tapes were part of a larger attempt by J. Edgar Hoover to denounce King by revelations in his personal life.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The FBI's Ugly Obsession With Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.|url=https://www.pbs.org/wnet/amanpour-and-company/video/the-fbis-ugly-obsession-with-dr-martin-luther-king-jr/|access-date=2021-01-23|website=[[Amanpour & Company]]|language=en-US}}</ref>''
* Here's an example of a sentence where it's not clear which of them is referred to: ''A white man was reported by a lone witness to have walked halfway up to King's door and thrown something against the door before running back to his car and speeding off.''


== Semi-protected edit request on 10 February 2024 ==
It should be clear by now that this is a problem — we cannot have two different people being referred to by the same name in the same article. However, it's not clear to me what to do about it. As far as I know, Wikipedia does not have a policy on this matter (please correct me if I am wrong!). ''[EDIT: We do have a policy, at MOS:SURNAME. It states, "After the initial mention, a person should generally be referred to by surname only – without an honorific prefix such as "Mr.", "Mrs.", or "Ms.", and without academic or professional prefixes like "Dr.", "Prof.", "Rev.", etc. – or may be referred to by a pronoun. ... Generally speaking, subjects should not otherwise be referred to by their given name."]'' There are, I believe, several possible solutions to this problem:


* We could refer to both people by their full names at all times. This might become awkward, but is perhaps most respectful.
* We could refer to both people by their first name only, except upon introduction. This is somewhat disrespectful, but it is relatively common when talking about, for example, the Curies.
* We could refer to Coretta Scott King as Mrs. King and Martin Luther King Jr. as Dr. King. At times in the article, Coretta Scott King is referred to as Mrs. King, but I think that usually on Wikipedia, we do not use honorifics within articles, except within cases where those are the most notable names.
* We could rewrite the article such that Coretta Scott King and only Coretta Scott King is referred to as simply "King." This seems like the most natural choice to me, since she is the subject of the article, but it breaks gendered conventions and might be confusing to the reader. It also raises the question of how to refer to Martin Luther King Jr.


Thoughts?
[[User:Birdsinthewindow|Birdsinthewindow]] ([[User talk:Birdsinthewindow|talk]]) 03:02, 18 January 2022 (UTC)


{{reflist-talk}}


== How was the life has a motherOn her ==


Martin Luther king's wife was a very hard working lady and was a very good violin player . She also showed her children how to play the piano witch is a very hard instrument she also played the trumpet. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.26.43.76|82.26.43.76]] ([[User talk:82.26.43.76#top|talk]]) 08:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
She had 4 kids [[Special:Contributions/12.108.229.229|12.108.229.229]] ([[User talk:12.108.229.229|talk]]) 00:58, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:29, 20 October 2024

Semi-protected edit request on 10 February 2024

[edit]

Martin Luther king's wife was a very hard working lady and was a very good violin player . She also showed her children how to play the piano witch is a very hard instrument she also played the trumpet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.26.43.76 (talk) 08:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Coretta_Scott_King&oldid=1252186491"