Jump to content

Talk:Stephenie Meyer: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Legobot (talk | contribs)
m Transcluding GA review
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 9 WikiProject templates. The article is listed in the level 5 page: US and Canada.
 
(32 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{GA nominee|23:17, 16 December 2019 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Skyes(BYU)|Skyes(BYU)]] ([[User talk:Skyes(BYU)|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Language and literature|status=onreview|note=}}
{{GA|19:20, 22 January 2020 (UTC)|topic=Language and literature|page=1|oldid=937070549}}
{{Talk header|noarchive=yes|search=no}}
{{Talk header|noarchive=yes|search=no}}
{{DYK talk|10 February|2020|entry= ... that the idea for the ''[[Twilight (novel series)|Twilight]]'' novel series came to '''[[Stephenie Meyer]]''' in a dream?|nompage=Template:Did you know nominations/Stephenie Meyer}}
{{WPBS|blp=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Biography |living=yes |class=b|listas=Meyer, Stephenie |auto=yes
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=GA|vital=yes|listas=Meyer, Stephenie|1=
{{WikiProject Harold B. Lee Library|21st century=yes}}
|a&e-priority=low |a&e-work-group=yes }}
{{WikiProject Romance|class=B|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Biography|a&e-work-group=yes |a&e-priority=Low}}
{{WikiProject Children's literature|class=b|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Romance|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Brigham Young University|class=b|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Children's literature||importance=Mid}}
{{NovelsWikiProject|class=B |importance=Low
{{WikiProject Brigham Young University|importance=Mid}}
|twilight-task-force=yes |twilight-importance=High
{{WikiProject Novels|importance=Low |twilight-task-force=yes |twilight-importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement|importance=Low}}
}}
{{LDSproject|class=b|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Women writers|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Women writers|class=B|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=low|AZ=yes|AZ-importance=Low}}
}}
}}
{{Connected contributor (paid)
|User1=Rachel Helps (BYU)|U1-employer=BYU|U1-EH=yes|U1-otherlinks=COI declarations [[User:Rachel Helps (BYU)#Conflict of Interest statements|on userpage]]
|User2=Skyes(BYU)|U2-employer=BYU|U2-EH=yes|U2-otherlinks=COI declarations [[User:Skyes(BYU)|on userpage]]
}}
}}


{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| archive = Talk:Stephenie Meyer/Archive %(counter)d
| archive = Talk:Stephenie Meyer/Archive %(counter)d
Line 19: Line 24:
| counter = 2
| counter = 2
| maxarchivesize = 100K
| maxarchivesize = 100K
| minthreadsleft = 1
| minthreadsleft = 5
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| archiveheader = {{Talkarchivenav}}
| archiveheader = {{Talkarchivenav}}
Line 29: Line 34:
| indexhere = yes
| indexhere = yes
}}
}}
{{Archives
{{Archive box
| auto = long
| index = /Archive index
| index = /Archive index
| bot = lowercase sigmabot III
| links = 5
| search = yes
| age = 120
| search-width = 40
| search-break = yes
| collapsible = yes
| collapsed = no
| bot = MiszaBot I
| units = days
| units = days
| age = 120
}}
}}
== DYK nomination ==
{{Vital article|level=5|topic=People|subpage=Writers|class=B}}
{{Did you know nominations/Stephenie Meyer}}

== Criticism by Stephen King ==

Is it appropriate to mention a criticism of an author by another author? If you think it's relevant, one should put it into another section and not among "reception" which shouldn't mean authors criticizing each other. --[[Special:Contributions/212.186.7.98|212.186.7.98]] ([[User talk:212.186.7.98|talk]]) 10:01, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

:So are you suggesting moving the Orson Scott Card comments out of the reception section and down to criticism, with the commentary from her other peers? —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 14:25, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


== LGBTQIA+ Rights Dispute ==
::No, both Card and King should stand in another section, one could call it "criticism by other authors" or so. --[[Special:Contributions/212.186.7.98|212.186.7.98]] ([[User talk:212.186.7.98|talk]]) 09:58, 8 August 2018 (UTC)


Hello @[[User:FreeThinker37|FreeThinker37]] , Could you please tell me where in the cited article for her LGBTQIA+ views Meyer " sent a message privately to Stewart containing a friendly message, along with a [[cease and desist]] notice". I couldn't find any evidence in the linked source which I why I removed the section that you added back. I also feel like the later half of the section that reads " The sudden homophobic retaliation of the statement was not surprising to many long time Stephenie Meyer detractors" is quite editorialized. I don't see how a 2009 article is relevant to a far more recent alleged homophobic incident (that still hasn't been proven) [[User:Woahitsraj|Woahitsraj]] ([[User talk:Woahitsraj|talk]]) 09:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
{{Talk:Stephenie Meyer/GA1}}

Latest revision as of 08:02, 20 October 2024


DYK nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk07:09, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reviewed: Bill Hare
  • Comment: Became GA on 1/22/2020

Improved to Good Article status by Skyes(BYU) (talk). Self-nominated at 20:49, 22 January 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article listed as GA 1/22/2020, not previously ITN or DYK, long enough, well cited, all 4 hooks stated in article and supported by inline citations and labeled as refs, no dispute tags, meets BLP criteria, neutrally written, not at AFD. QPQ completed. Hooks are all formatted well, are short enough, neutral, and focus on unusual facts. ALT0 wins my vote for the surprise effect! Good to go. Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 21:28, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LGBTQIA+ Rights Dispute

[edit]

Hello @FreeThinker37 , Could you please tell me where in the cited article for her LGBTQIA+ views Meyer " sent a message privately to Stewart containing a friendly message, along with a cease and desist notice". I couldn't find any evidence in the linked source which I why I removed the section that you added back. I also feel like the later half of the section that reads " The sudden homophobic retaliation of the statement was not surprising to many long time Stephenie Meyer detractors" is quite editorialized. I don't see how a 2009 article is relevant to a far more recent alleged homophobic incident (that still hasn't been proven) Woahitsraj (talk) 09:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]