Talk:Stephenie Meyer: Difference between revisions
m Transcluding GA review |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 9 WikiProject templates. The article is listed in the level 5 page: US and Canada. Tag: |
||
(32 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA |
{{GA|19:20, 22 January 2020 (UTC)|topic=Language and literature|page=1|oldid=937070549}} |
||
{{Talk header|noarchive=yes|search=no}} |
{{Talk header|noarchive=yes|search=no}} |
||
{{DYK talk|10 February|2020|entry= ... that the idea for the ''[[Twilight (novel series)|Twilight]]'' novel series came to '''[[Stephenie Meyer]]''' in a dream?|nompage=Template:Did you know nominations/Stephenie Meyer}} |
|||
{{WPBS|blp=yes|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=GA|vital=yes|listas=Meyer, Stephenie|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Harold B. Lee Library|21st century=yes}} |
|||
|a&e-priority=low |a&e-work-group=yes }} |
|||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Biography|a&e-work-group=yes |a&e-priority=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Romance|importance=High}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Children's literature||importance=Mid}} |
||
{{ |
{{WikiProject Brigham Young University|importance=Mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject Novels|importance=Low |twilight-task-force=yes |twilight-importance=High}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement|importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{ |
{{WikiProject Women writers|importance=High}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject United States|importance=low|AZ=yes|AZ-importance=Low}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Connected contributor (paid) |
|||
|User1=Rachel Helps (BYU)|U1-employer=BYU|U1-EH=yes|U1-otherlinks=COI declarations [[User:Rachel Helps (BYU)#Conflict of Interest statements|on userpage]] |
|||
|User2=Skyes(BYU)|U2-employer=BYU|U2-EH=yes|U2-otherlinks=COI declarations [[User:Skyes(BYU)|on userpage]] |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
| archive = Talk:Stephenie Meyer/Archive %(counter)d |
| archive = Talk:Stephenie Meyer/Archive %(counter)d |
||
Line 19: | Line 24: | ||
| counter = 2 |
| counter = 2 |
||
| maxarchivesize = 100K |
| maxarchivesize = 100K |
||
| minthreadsleft = |
| minthreadsleft = 5 |
||
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
||
| archiveheader = {{Talkarchivenav}} |
| archiveheader = {{Talkarchivenav}} |
||
Line 29: | Line 34: | ||
| indexhere = yes |
| indexhere = yes |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Archives |
|||
{{Archive box |
|||
| auto = long |
|||
| index = /Archive index |
| index = /Archive index |
||
| bot = lowercase sigmabot III |
|||
| links = 5 |
|||
| |
| age = 120 |
||
| search-width = 40 |
|||
| search-break = yes |
|||
| collapsible = yes |
|||
| collapsed = no |
|||
| bot = MiszaBot I |
|||
| units = days |
| units = days |
||
| age = 120 |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
== DYK nomination == |
|||
{{Vital article|level=5|topic=People|subpage=Writers|class=B}} |
|||
{{Did you know nominations/Stephenie Meyer}} |
|||
== Criticism by Stephen King == |
|||
Is it appropriate to mention a criticism of an author by another author? If you think it's relevant, one should put it into another section and not among "reception" which shouldn't mean authors criticizing each other. --[[Special:Contributions/212.186.7.98|212.186.7.98]] ([[User talk:212.186.7.98|talk]]) 10:01, 6 August 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:So are you suggesting moving the Orson Scott Card comments out of the reception section and down to criticism, with the commentary from her other peers? —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 14:25, 6 August 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== LGBTQIA+ Rights Dispute == |
|||
::No, both Card and King should stand in another section, one could call it "criticism by other authors" or so. --[[Special:Contributions/212.186.7.98|212.186.7.98]] ([[User talk:212.186.7.98|talk]]) 09:58, 8 August 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Hello @[[User:FreeThinker37|FreeThinker37]] , Could you please tell me where in the cited article for her LGBTQIA+ views Meyer " sent a message privately to Stewart containing a friendly message, along with a [[cease and desist]] notice". I couldn't find any evidence in the linked source which I why I removed the section that you added back. I also feel like the later half of the section that reads " The sudden homophobic retaliation of the statement was not surprising to many long time Stephenie Meyer detractors" is quite editorialized. I don't see how a 2009 article is relevant to a far more recent alleged homophobic incident (that still hasn't been proven) [[User:Woahitsraj|Woahitsraj]] ([[User talk:Woahitsraj|talk]]) 09:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{Talk:Stephenie Meyer/GA1}} |
Latest revision as of 08:02, 20 October 2024
Stephenie Meyer has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 22, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stephenie Meyer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Stephenie Meyer appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 February 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Index
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
DYK nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:09, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- ... that the idea for the Twilight series came to Stephenie Meyer in a dream in June 2003? Source:[1][2][3]
- ALT1:... that Stephenie Meyer's novel Breaking Dawn won the British Book Award for Children's Book of the Year, despite competition from J. K. Rowling's The Tales of Beedle the Bard? Source:[4]
- ALT2:... that Stephenie Meyer was the first author to have books in all four of the top-selling spots in USA Today's year-end bestseller list? Source: [5]
- ALT3:... that Stephenie Meyer's novel Midnight Sun was put on hold indefinitely due to an online leak of its rough draft? Source: [6]
- Reviewed: Bill Hare
- Comment: Became GA on 1/22/2020
Improved to Good Article status by Skyes(BYU) (talk). Self-nominated at 20:49, 22 January 2020 (UTC).
- Article listed as GA 1/22/2020, not previously ITN or DYK, long enough, well cited, all 4 hooks stated in article and supported by inline citations and labeled as refs, no dispute tags, meets BLP criteria, neutrally written, not at AFD. QPQ completed. Hooks are all formatted well, are short enough, neutral, and focus on unusual facts. ALT0 wins my vote for the surprise effect! Good to go. Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 21:28, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
LGBTQIA+ Rights Dispute
[edit]Hello @FreeThinker37 , Could you please tell me where in the cited article for her LGBTQIA+ views Meyer " sent a message privately to Stewart containing a friendly message, along with a cease and desist notice". I couldn't find any evidence in the linked source which I why I removed the section that you added back. I also feel like the later half of the section that reads " The sudden homophobic retaliation of the statement was not surprising to many long time Stephenie Meyer detractors" is quite editorialized. I don't see how a 2009 article is relevant to a far more recent alleged homophobic incident (that still hasn't been proven) Woahitsraj (talk) 09:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Language and literature good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Biography articles of living people
- GA-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- GA-Class vital articles in People
- GA-Class Harold B. Lee Library-related articles
- Unknown-importance Harold B. Lee Library-related articles
- Harold B. Lee Library-related 21st century articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Low-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class romance articles
- High-importance romance articles
- WikiProject Romance articles
- GA-Class children and young adult literature articles
- Mid-importance children and young adult literature articles
- GA-Class Brigham Young University articles
- Mid-importance Brigham Young University articles
- WikiProject Brigham Young University articles
- GA-Class novel articles
- Low-importance novel articles
- GA-Class Twilight task force articles
- High-importance Twilight task force articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- GA-Class Latter Day Saint movement articles
- Low-importance Latter Day Saint movement articles
- WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement articles
- GA-Class Women writers articles
- High-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Arizona articles
- Low-importance Arizona articles
- WikiProject Arizona articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions