Jump to content

Kentsfield (microprocessor): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Fix link to dab Cache
Updated slight mistakes and added more info
 
(37 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
| produced-start = 2006
| produced-start = 2006
| produced-end = 2009
| produced-end = 2009
| slowest = 2133
| slowest = 0.09
| fastest = 3000
| fastest = 3.00
| slow-unit = Mhz
| slow-unit = GHz
| fast-unit = Mhz
| fast-unit = GHz
| fsb-slowest = 1066
| fsb-slowest = 1066
| fsb-fastest = 1333
| fsb-fastest = 1333
| fsb-slow-unit = MT/s
| fsb-slow-unit = MT/s
| fsb-fast-unit = MT/s
| fsb-fast-unit = MT/s
| size-from =
| size-from = 65 nm
| size-to =
| size-to =
| soldby =
| soldby = Intel
| designfirm =
| designfirm = Intel
| manuf1 =
| manuf1 = Intel
| core1 =
| core1 =
| sock1 = [[LGA 775]]
| sock1 = [[LGA 775]]
Line 32: Line 32:
| numcores = 4
| numcores = 4
| l1cache =
| l1cache =
| l2cache = 2x4 MiB
| l2cache = 2 × 4 MiB
| l3cache =
| l3cache =
| application = Desktop, UP Server
| application = Desktop, UP Server
| predecessor = Presler
}}
| successor = [[Yorkfield (microprocessor)|Yorkfield]]
|variant1=[[Clovertown (microprocessor)|Clovertown]]}}


'''Kentsfield''' is the code name of the first [[Intel]] desktop [[Multi-core|quad core]]<ref name="TG Daily">{{cite web |title=Intel Clovertowns step up, reduce power |url=http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/33708/135/ |publisher=TG Daily |accessdate=2007-09-05}}</ref> [[CPU]] branded Core 2 (and [[Xeon#3200-series .22Kentsfield.22|Xeon]] for lower-end servers and workstations), released on November 2, 2006. The top-of-the-line Kentsfields were Core 2 '''Extreme''' models numbered '''QX'''6xx0, while the mainstream ones branded Core 2 '''Quad''' were numbered '''Q'''6xx0. All of them featured two 4&nbsp;MB L2 [[CPU cache|caches]]. The mainstream Core 2 Quad Q6600, clocked at 2.4&nbsp;GHz, was launched on January 8, 2007 at US$851 (reduced to US$530 on April 7, 2007). July 22, 2007 marked the release of the Q6700, and Extreme QX6850 Kentsfields at US$530 and US$999 respectively along with a further price reduction of the Q6600 to US$266.<ref>{{cite news |title= Intel Q3's Prices Revealed: 70% off to Intel C2Q Q6600 |url=http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/itnews.php?tid=754873 |publisher=HKEPC Hardware |accessdate=2007-03-16}} {{Dead link|date=October 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> Both Kentsfield and Kentsfield XE use product code 80562.
'''Kentsfield''' is the code name of the first [[Intel]] desktop Core 2 Quad and quad-core [[Xeon#3200-series .22Kentsfield.22|Xeon]] CPUs,<ref name="TG Daily">{{cite web |title=Intel Clovertowns step up, reduce power |url=http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/33708/135/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070911222341/http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/33708/135/ |archive-date=2007-09-11 |access-date=2007-09-05 |publisher=TG Daily}}</ref> released on November 2, 2006. The top-of-the-line Kentsfields were Core 2 Extreme models numbered ''QX6x00'', while the mainstream Core 2 Quad models were numbered ''Q6x00''. All of them featured two 8&nbsp;MiB L2 [[CPU cache|cache]]. The mainstream 65 nanometer Core 2 Quad Q6600, clocked at 2.4&nbsp;GHz, was launched on January 8, 2007 at US$851 (reduced to US$530 on April 7, 2007). July 22, 2007 marked the release of the Core 2 Quad Q6700 and Core 2 Extreme QX6850 Kentsfields at US$530 and US$999 respectively; the price of the Q6600 was later reduced to US$266.<ref>{{cite news |title=Intel Q3's Prices Revealed: 70% off to Intel C2Q Q6600 |url=http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/itnews.php?tid=754873 |publisher=HKEPC Hardware |access-date=2007-03-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070315182543/http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/itnews.php?tid=754873 |archive-date=2007-03-15 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Both Kentsfield and Kentsfield XE use product code 80562.


== Variants ==
== Variants ==
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
! Processor !! Brand name !! Model (list) !! Cores !! L2 Cache !! Socket || TDP
! Processor !! Brand name !! Model (list) !! Cores !! L2 cache !! Socket || TDP
|-
|-
| Kentsfield
| Kentsfield
| [[Xeon]] || [[List of Intel Xeon microprocessors#"Kentsfield" (65 nm)|32xx]] || 4 || 2x4 MiB || [[LGA 775]] || 95-105 W
| [[Xeon]] || [[List of Intel Xeon microprocessors#"Kentsfield" (65 nm)|32xx]] || 4 || 2 × 4 MiB || [[LGA 775]] || 95–105 W
|-
|-
| Kentsfield
| Kentsfield
| [[Intel Core#Core 2 Quad|Core 2 Quad]] || [[List of Intel Core 2 microprocessors#"Kentsfield" (65 nm)|Q6xxx]] || 4 || 2x4 MiB || LGA 775 || 95-105 W
| [[Intel Core#Core 2 Quad|Core 2 Quad]] || [[List of Intel Core 2 microprocessors#"Kentsfield" (65 nm)|Q6xxx]] || 4 || 2 × 4 MiB || LGA 775 || 95–105 W
|-
|-
| Kentsfield XE
| Kentsfield XE
| [[Intel Core#Core 2 Extreme|Core 2 Extreme]] || [[List of Intel Core 2 microprocessors#"Kentsfield XE" (65 nm)|QX6xxx]] || 4 || 2x4 MiB || LGA 775 || 130 W
| [[Intel Core#Core 2 Extreme|Core 2 Extreme]] || [[List of Intel Core 2 microprocessors#"Kentsfield XE" (65 nm)|QX6xxx]] || 4 || 2 × 4 MiB || LGA 775 || 130 W
|}
|}


=== Kentsfield ===
===Kentsfield===
Analogous to the [[Pentium D]] branded CPUs, the Kentsfields comprise two separate silicon dies (each equivalent to a single Core 2 duo) on one [[Multi-Chip Module|MCM]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Intel Kentsfield Preview |url=http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/kentsfield-preview_2.html |publisher=X-bit labs |accessdate=2006-09-29}}</ref> This results in lower costs but lesser share of the bandwidth from each of the CPUs to the [[northbridge (computing)|northbridge]] than if the dies were each to sit in separate sockets as is the case for example with the [[AMD Quad FX platform]].<ref>{{cite web |title=AMD's Quad FX platform: AMD decides to socket to 'em|url=http://techreport.com/reviews/2006q4/quad-fx/index.x?pg=1 |publisher=The Tech Report |accessdate=2007-06-11}}</ref> Also, as might be predicted from the two-die MCM configuration, the max power consumption ([[Thermal Design Power|TDP]]) of the Kentsfield (QX6800 - 130&nbsp;[[watt]]s,
Analogous to the [[Pentium D]] branded CPUs, the Kentsfields comprise two separate silicon dies (each equivalent to a single Core 2 Duo) on one [[Multi-Chip Module|MCM]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Intel Kentsfield Preview |url=http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/kentsfield-preview_2.html |publisher=X-bit labs |access-date=2006-09-29 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061105065330/http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/kentsfield-preview_2.html |archive-date=2006-11-05 }}</ref> This results in lower costs, but a lesser share of the bandwidth from each of the CPUs to the [[northbridge (computing)|northbridge]] than if the dies were each to sit in separate sockets as is the case for the [[AMD Quad FX platform]].<ref>{{cite web |title=AMD's Quad FX platform: AMD decides to socket to 'em|url=http://techreport.com/reviews/2006q4/quad-fx/index.x?pg=1 |publisher=The Tech Report |access-date=2007-06-11}}</ref> As might be predicted from the two-die MCM configuration, the [[Thermal Design Power|thermal design power]] of the Kentsfield (QX6800 - 130&nbsp;[[watt]]s,
<ref>{{cite web |title=Overindulge Yourself with QX6800: Not Your Plain Vanilla System!|url=http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/04/13/overindulge_yourself_with_qx6800/|publisher=Tom's Hardware|accessdate=2007-06-11}}</ref>
<ref>{{cite web|title=Overindulge Yourself with QX6800: Not Your Plain Vanilla System!|url=http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/04/13/overindulge_yourself_with_qx6800/|publisher=Tom's Hardware|access-date=2007-06-11}}{{Dead link|date=May 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
QX6700 - 130&nbsp;W,
QX6700 - 130&nbsp;W,
<ref>{{cite web |title=Intel quad-core QX6700 reaches system builders |url=http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/29114/135/ |publisher=TG Daily |accessdate=2007-06-11}}</ref>
<ref>{{cite web |title=Intel quad-core QX6700 reaches system builders |url=http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/29114/135/ |publisher=TG Daily |access-date=2007-06-11 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070926232451/http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/29114/135/ |archive-date=2007-09-26 }}</ref>
Q6600 - 95&nbsp;W
Q6600 - 105&nbsp;W
<ref>{{cite web |title=Intel pushes Q6600 quad-core CPU into 95 watt systems |url=http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/31822/135/ |publisher=TG Daily |accessdate=2007-06-11}}</ref>) has been found to be double that of its similarly clocked Core 2 Duo counterpart.
<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ark.intel.com/products/29765|title=Intel® Core™2 Quad Processor Q6600|website=Intel Ark|publisher=Intel}}</ref>) is double that of its similarly clocked Core 2 Duo counterpart.


The [[Multi-core (computing)|multiple cores]] of the Kentsfield most benefit applications that can easily be broken into a small number of parallel [[Thread (computer science)|threads]] (such as audio and video [[transcoding]], [[data compression]], [[Video editing software|video editing]], [[Rendering (computer graphics)|3D rendering]] and [[Ray tracing (graphics)|ray-tracing]]). To take a specific example, multi-threaded games such as [[Crysis]] and [[Gears of War]] which must perform multiple simultaneous tasks such as AI, audio and physics benefit from the quad-core CPUs.<ref>{{cite web |title=Crysis - Confirmed Runs Best on Quad Core and 64 Bit OS |url=http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/98121-13-crysis-confirmed-runs-quad-core |publisher=Tom's Hardware |accessdate=2007-08-28}}</ref> In such cases, the processing performance may increase relative to that of a single-CPU system by a factor approaching the number of CPUs. This should, however, be considered an upper limit as it presupposes the user-level software is well-threaded. To return to the above example, some tests have demonstrated that Crysis fails to take advantage of more than two cores at any given time.<ref>{{cite web |title=No Quad Core Scaling in Crysis? |url=http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2209093,00.asp |publisher=Extreme Tech |accessdate=2008-03-09}}</ref> On the other hand, the impact of this issue on broader system performance can be significantly reduced on systems which frequently handle numerous unrelated simultaneous tasks such as multi-user environments or desktops which execute background processes while the user is active. There is still, however, some overhead involved in coordinating execution of multiple processes or threads and scheduling them on multiple CPUs which scales with the number of threads/CPUs. Finally, on the hardware level there exists the possibility of bottlenecks arising from the sharing of memory and/or I/O bandwidth between processors.
The [[Multi-core (computing)|multiple cores]] of the Kentsfield mostly benefits applications that can easily be broken into a small number of parallel [[Thread (computer science)|threads]] (such as audio and video [[transcoding]], [[data compression]], [[Video editing software|video editing]], [[Rendering (computer graphics)|3D rendering]] and [[Ray tracing (graphics)|ray-tracing]]). To take a specific example, multi-threaded games such as [[Crysis]] and [[Gears of War]] which must perform multiple simultaneous tasks such as AI, audio and physics benefit from quad-core CPUs.<ref>{{cite web |title=Crysis - Confirmed Runs Best on Quad Core and 64 Bit OS |url=http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/98121-13-crysis-confirmed-runs-quad-core |publisher=Tom's Hardware |access-date=2007-08-28}}</ref> In such cases, the processing performance may increase relative to that of a single-CPU system by a factor approaching the number of CPUs. This should, however, be considered an upper limit as it assumes that the user-level software is properly threaded. Alternatively, if the system uses integrated graphics with no or limited shader support (such as Intel's GMA 9xx and 31xx series), and a game uses only 1 or 2 cores, the extra cores could be given the task of emulating pixel and or vertex shading, improving the game's graphics quality. Since the L2 cache is separated in two parts, one for each dual core module, this would also make parallelizing the shading and other general purpose tasks easier compared to on single die quad core CPUs with fully shared L2 cache.
To return to the above mentioned gaming example, some tests have demonstrated that Crysis fails to take advantage of more than two cores at any given time.<ref>{{cite web |title=No Quad Core Scaling in Crysis? |url=http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2209093,00.asp |publisher=Extreme Tech |access-date=2008-03-09}}</ref> On the other hand, the impact of this issue on broader system performance can be significantly reduced on systems which frequently handle numerous unrelated simultaneous tasks such as multi-user environments or desktops which execute background processes while the user is active, or even video encoding if hardware encoding is not available or not desired (software encoding can be more bitrate efficient than hardware encoding) and there are resources available for it. There is still, however, some overhead involved in coordinating execution of multiple processes or threads and scheduling them on multiple CPUs which scales with the number of threads/CPUs. Finally, on the hardware level there exists the possibility of bottlenecks arising from the sharing of memory and/or I/O bandwidth between processors.


===Kentsfield XE===
===Kentsfield XE===
The first ''Kentsfield XE'', named Core 2 Extreme QX6700 (product code 80562) and clocked at 2.67&nbsp;GHz, was released on November 2, 2006, at US$999.<ref>{{cite web |title= Intel's Core 2 Extreme QX6700: The Multi-core Era Begins |url=http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2866 |publisher=AnandTech |accessdate=2006-11-11}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 |url=http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2006/11/02/intel_core_2_extreme_qx6700/1.html |publisher=Bit-Tech |accessdate=2006-11-11}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title= "Kentsfield" to Debut at 2.66&nbsp;GHz |url=http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=3829 |publisher=DailyTech |accessdate=2006-09-29}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The Quad Squad |url=http://reviews.cnet.com/4321-3118_7-6550458.html?tag=cnetfd.mt |publisher=CNET |accessdate=2006-11-12}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Intel "Kentsfield" Named Core 2 Quad |url=http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4332 |publisher=DailyTech |accessdate=2006-09-29}}</ref> January 4, 2008, marks its discontinuation.<ref>{{cite web |title=Intel already phasing out first quad-core CPU |url=http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/33752/135/ |publisher=TG Daily |accessdate=2007-09-07}}</ref> It featured the '''Kentsfield XE''' core, and complemented the Core 2 Extreme X6800 dual-core processor based on the [[Conroe (microprocessor)#Conroe XE|Conroe XE]] core. Like their dual core Extreme predecessors, CPUs with the ''Kentsfield XE'' core had unlocked multipliers.
The first ''Kentsfield XE'' processor, the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 (product code 80562) with a clock speed of 2.67&nbsp;GHz, was released on November 2, 2006 at US$999.<ref>{{cite web |title= Intel's Core 2 Extreme QX6700: The Multi-core Era Begins |url=http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2866 |publisher=AnandTech |access-date=2006-11-11}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 |url=http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2006/11/02/intel_core_2_extreme_qx6700/1.html |publisher=Bit-Tech |access-date=2006-11-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061215090416/http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2006/11/02/intel_core_2_extreme_qx6700/1.html |archive-date=2006-12-15 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title="Kentsfield" to Debut at 2.66&nbsp;GHz |url=http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=3829 |publisher=DailyTech |access-date=2006-09-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061021081154/http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=3829 |archive-date=2006-10-21 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The Quad Squad |url=http://reviews.cnet.com/4321-3118_7-6550458.html?tag=cnetfd.mt |publisher=CNET |access-date=2006-11-12}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Intel "Kentsfield" Named Core 2 Quad |url=http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4332 |publisher=DailyTech |access-date=2006-09-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930014628/http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4332 |archive-date=2007-09-30 |url-status=dead }}</ref> It was discontinued on January 4, 2008.<ref>{{cite web |title=Intel already phasing out first quad-core CPU |url=http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/33752/135/ |publisher=TG Daily |access-date=2007-09-07 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070913123702/http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/33752/135/ |archive-date=2007-09-13 }}</ref> It featured the ''Kentsfield XE'' core and complemented the Core 2 Extreme X6800 dual-core processor based on the [[Conroe (microprocessor)#Conroe XE|Conroe XE]] core. Similarly to the previous dual-core Extreme processors, CPUs with the ''Kentsfield XE'' core had unlocked multipliers.


The Core 2 Extreme QX6800 clocked at 2.93&nbsp;GHz was released on April 8, 2007, at US$1,199. It had a 130&nbsp;[[Watt|W]] [[Thermal Design Power|TDP]] thermal envelope, and was intended for high end OEM-only systems.<ref>{{cite web |title=Overindulge Yourself with QX6800: Not Your Plain Vanilla System! |url=http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/04/13/overindulge_yourself_with_qx6800/ |publisher=Tom's Hardware |accessdate=2007-06-11}}</ref>
The Core 2 Extreme QX6800 clocked at 2.93&nbsp;GHz was released on April 8, 2007, at US$1,199. It had a 130&nbsp;[[Watt|W]] [[Thermal Design Power|TDP]] thermal envelope, and was intended for high end OEM-only systems.<ref>{{cite web |title=Overindulge Yourself with QX6800: Not Your Plain Vanilla System! |url=http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/04/13/overindulge_yourself_with_qx6800/ |publisher=Tom's Hardware |access-date=2007-06-11 }}{{Dead link|date=May 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>


The Core 2 Extreme QX6850 clocked at 3.0&nbsp;GHz was launched on July 22, 2007, at US$999. It featured a faster 1333&nbsp;MT/s [[Front side bus|FSB]]. Simultaneously, the previously available Extreme QX6700 was reduced in price.
The Core 2 Extreme QX6850 clocked at 3.0&nbsp;GHz was launched on July 22, 2007, at US$999. It featured a faster 1333&nbsp;MT/s [[Front side bus|FSB]]. Simultaneously, the previously available Core 2 Extreme QX6700 had its price reduced.


== Related processors ==
== Related processors ==
The dual-core desktop version of Kentsfield is [[Conroe (microprocessor)|Conroe]], the server versions of Kentsfield are the dual-processor [[Clovertown (microprocessor)|Clovertown]] (Xeon 53xx) and the multi-processor [[Tigerton (microprocessor)|Tigerton]] (Xeon 73xx).
The dual-core desktop version of Kentsfield is [[Conroe (microprocessor)|Conroe]]. The server versions of Kentsfield are the dual-processor [[Clovertown (microprocessor)|Clovertown]] (Xeon 53xx) and the multi-processor [[Tigerton (microprocessor)|Tigerton]] (Xeon 73xx).


== Successor ==
== Successor ==
Kentsfield was subsequently replaced by the 45&nbsp;nm [[Yorkfield (microprocessor)|Yorkfield]] processor.
Kentsfield was replaced by the 45&nbsp;nm [[Yorkfield (microprocessor)|Yorkfield]] processor.
{{IntelProcessorRoadmap}}
{{IntelProcessorRoadmap}}


Line 82: Line 86:
{{Intel processors|core}}
{{Intel processors|core}}


[[Category:Intel microprocessors]]
[[fr:Kentsfield]]
[[it:Kentsfield]]

Latest revision as of 19:23, 20 October 2024

Kentsfield
Intel Core 2 Quad Kentsfield Q6600
General information
Launched2006
Discontinued2009
Marketed byIntel
Designed byIntel
Common manufacturer
  • Intel
CPUID code06Fx
Product code80562
Performance
Max. CPU clock rate0.09 GHz to 3.00 GHz
FSB speeds1066 MT/s to 1333 MT/s
Cache
L2 cache2 × 4 MiB
Architecture and classification
ApplicationDesktop, UP Server
Technology node65 nm
MicroarchitectureCore
Instruction setx86-64
Physical specifications
Cores
  • 4
Socket
Products, models, variants
Brand names
Variant
History
PredecessorPresler
SuccessorYorkfield

Kentsfield is the code name of the first Intel desktop Core 2 Quad and quad-core Xeon CPUs,[1] released on November 2, 2006. The top-of-the-line Kentsfields were Core 2 Extreme models numbered QX6x00, while the mainstream Core 2 Quad models were numbered Q6x00. All of them featured two 8 MiB L2 cache. The mainstream 65 nanometer Core 2 Quad Q6600, clocked at 2.4 GHz, was launched on January 8, 2007 at US$851 (reduced to US$530 on April 7, 2007). July 22, 2007 marked the release of the Core 2 Quad Q6700 and Core 2 Extreme QX6850 Kentsfields at US$530 and US$999 respectively; the price of the Q6600 was later reduced to US$266.[2] Both Kentsfield and Kentsfield XE use product code 80562.

Variants

[edit]
Processor Brand name Model (list) Cores L2 cache Socket TDP
Kentsfield Xeon 32xx 4 2 × 4 MiB LGA 775 95–105 W
Kentsfield Core 2 Quad Q6xxx 4 2 × 4 MiB LGA 775 95–105 W
Kentsfield XE Core 2 Extreme QX6xxx 4 2 × 4 MiB LGA 775 130 W

Kentsfield

[edit]

Analogous to the Pentium D branded CPUs, the Kentsfields comprise two separate silicon dies (each equivalent to a single Core 2 Duo) on one MCM.[3] This results in lower costs, but a lesser share of the bandwidth from each of the CPUs to the northbridge than if the dies were each to sit in separate sockets as is the case for the AMD Quad FX platform.[4] As might be predicted from the two-die MCM configuration, the thermal design power of the Kentsfield (QX6800 - 130 watts, [5] QX6700 - 130 W, [6] Q6600 - 105 W [7]) is double that of its similarly clocked Core 2 Duo counterpart.

The multiple cores of the Kentsfield mostly benefits applications that can easily be broken into a small number of parallel threads (such as audio and video transcoding, data compression, video editing, 3D rendering and ray-tracing). To take a specific example, multi-threaded games such as Crysis and Gears of War which must perform multiple simultaneous tasks such as AI, audio and physics benefit from quad-core CPUs.[8] In such cases, the processing performance may increase relative to that of a single-CPU system by a factor approaching the number of CPUs. This should, however, be considered an upper limit as it assumes that the user-level software is properly threaded. Alternatively, if the system uses integrated graphics with no or limited shader support (such as Intel's GMA 9xx and 31xx series), and a game uses only 1 or 2 cores, the extra cores could be given the task of emulating pixel and or vertex shading, improving the game's graphics quality. Since the L2 cache is separated in two parts, one for each dual core module, this would also make parallelizing the shading and other general purpose tasks easier compared to on single die quad core CPUs with fully shared L2 cache.

To return to the above mentioned gaming example, some tests have demonstrated that Crysis fails to take advantage of more than two cores at any given time.[9] On the other hand, the impact of this issue on broader system performance can be significantly reduced on systems which frequently handle numerous unrelated simultaneous tasks such as multi-user environments or desktops which execute background processes while the user is active, or even video encoding if hardware encoding is not available or not desired (software encoding can be more bitrate efficient than hardware encoding) and there are resources available for it. There is still, however, some overhead involved in coordinating execution of multiple processes or threads and scheduling them on multiple CPUs which scales with the number of threads/CPUs. Finally, on the hardware level there exists the possibility of bottlenecks arising from the sharing of memory and/or I/O bandwidth between processors.

Kentsfield XE

[edit]

The first Kentsfield XE processor, the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 (product code 80562) with a clock speed of 2.67 GHz, was released on November 2, 2006 at US$999.[10][11][12][13][14] It was discontinued on January 4, 2008.[15] It featured the Kentsfield XE core and complemented the Core 2 Extreme X6800 dual-core processor based on the Conroe XE core. Similarly to the previous dual-core Extreme processors, CPUs with the Kentsfield XE core had unlocked multipliers.

The Core 2 Extreme QX6800 clocked at 2.93 GHz was released on April 8, 2007, at US$1,199. It had a 130 W TDP thermal envelope, and was intended for high end OEM-only systems.[16]

The Core 2 Extreme QX6850 clocked at 3.0 GHz was launched on July 22, 2007, at US$999. It featured a faster 1333 MT/s FSB. Simultaneously, the previously available Core 2 Extreme QX6700 had its price reduced.

[edit]

The dual-core desktop version of Kentsfield is Conroe. The server versions of Kentsfield are the dual-processor Clovertown (Xeon 53xx) and the multi-processor Tigerton (Xeon 73xx).

Successor

[edit]

Kentsfield was replaced by the 45 nm Yorkfield processor.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Intel Clovertowns step up, reduce power". TG Daily. Archived from the original on 2007-09-11. Retrieved 2007-09-05.
  2. ^ "Intel Q3's Prices Revealed: 70% off to Intel C2Q Q6600". HKEPC Hardware. Archived from the original on 2007-03-15. Retrieved 2007-03-16.
  3. ^ "Intel Kentsfield Preview". X-bit labs. Archived from the original on 2006-11-05. Retrieved 2006-09-29.
  4. ^ "AMD's Quad FX platform: AMD decides to socket to 'em". The Tech Report. Retrieved 2007-06-11.
  5. ^ "Overindulge Yourself with QX6800: Not Your Plain Vanilla System!". Tom's Hardware. Retrieved 2007-06-11.[permanent dead link]
  6. ^ "Intel quad-core QX6700 reaches system builders". TG Daily. Archived from the original on 2007-09-26. Retrieved 2007-06-11.
  7. ^ "Intel® Core™2 Quad Processor Q6600". Intel Ark. Intel.
  8. ^ "Crysis - Confirmed Runs Best on Quad Core and 64 Bit OS". Tom's Hardware. Retrieved 2007-08-28.
  9. ^ "No Quad Core Scaling in Crysis?". Extreme Tech. Retrieved 2008-03-09.
  10. ^ "Intel's Core 2 Extreme QX6700: The Multi-core Era Begins". AnandTech. Retrieved 2006-11-11.
  11. ^ "Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700". Bit-Tech. Archived from the original on 2006-12-15. Retrieved 2006-11-11.
  12. ^ ""Kentsfield" to Debut at 2.66 GHz". DailyTech. Archived from the original on 2006-10-21. Retrieved 2006-09-29.
  13. ^ "The Quad Squad". CNET. Retrieved 2006-11-12.
  14. ^ "Intel "Kentsfield" Named Core 2 Quad". DailyTech. Archived from the original on 2007-09-30. Retrieved 2006-09-29.
  15. ^ "Intel already phasing out first quad-core CPU". TG Daily. Archived from the original on 2007-09-13. Retrieved 2007-09-07.
  16. ^ "Overindulge Yourself with QX6800: Not Your Plain Vanilla System!". Tom's Hardware. Retrieved 2007-06-11.[permanent dead link]