Jump to content

Talk:Hotel California: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Undid unexplained and downright weird revision 1252586843 by DarknessGoth777 (talk), adding {{WP Horror}}
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
⚫
{{Skip to talk}}
{{talkheader}}
{{Vital article|class=GA|level=5|topic=Arts}}
⚫
{{not a forum|Hotel California|<br/>Per [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Songs#Article_content|Wikiproject Songs]], stick to factual material. Do not include "original research" such as opinions about a song, or interpretations of the lyrics or even statements about what the song is "about", unless they can be provided in the form of quotes that can be cited from sources with some authoritative insight (such as the songwriter or a notable performer). Other websites are available for people who want to give subjective interpretations of songs.}}
{{GA|19:56, 21 December 2017 (UTC)|topic=music|page=|oldid=816511113}}
{{GA|19:56, 21 December 2017 (UTC)|topic=music|page=|oldid=816511113}}
⚫
{{Skip to talk}}
⚫
{{WikiProject Songs|class=GA
{{Talk header}}
<!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. -->
⚫
{{Not a forum|Hotel California|<br/>Per [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Songs#Article_content|Wikiproject Songs]], stick to factual material. Do not include "original research" such as opinions about a song, or interpretations of the lyrics or even statements about what the song is "about", unless they can be provided in the form of quotes that can be cited from sources with some authoritative insight (such as the songwriter or a notable performer). Other websites are available for people who want to give subjective interpretations of songs.}}
|B-Class-1=yes
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|vital=yes|1=
<!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. -->
⚫
{{WikiProject Songs}}
|B-Class-2=yes
⚫
{{WikiProject Rock music|importance=Top}}
<!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->
}}
|B-Class-3=yes

<!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->
|B-Class-4=yes
<!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->
|B-Class-5=yes
<!-- B-Class-6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. -->
|B-Class-6=yes
|importance=High}}
⚫
{{WPRock|class=GA|importance=Top}}
<!--- Archive basics needs [[User:Technical 13/Scripts/OneClickArchiver]]. Configured by [[User:Mlpearc]] --->
<!--- Archive basics needs [[User:Technical 13/Scripts/OneClickArchiver]]. Configured by [[User:Mlpearc]] --->
{{Archive basics
{{Archive basics

Latest revision as of 02:38, 22 October 2024


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hotel California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personnel

[edit]

Would it be better if the personnel was narrowed down further, with Glenn on 'acoustic 12-string rhythm guitar', Don F on 'electric 12 and 6 string lead guitar', and Joe on 'electric lead guitar'? 106.68.153.211 (talk) 16:04, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 July 2017

[edit]

In the "Recordings" section, there is the phrase:

"the record company was reluctant to release it as a single because of the length of song which is over six minutes long, far exceeding the standard length of songs played by radio stations"

This feels clumsy. I'd like to suggest that it is amended to:

"the record company was reluctant to release it as a single because, at over six minutes, its duration far exceeds that of the songs generally played by radio stations" Stephenallsopp (talk) 11:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 17:06, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 August 2017

[edit]

The chord progression for the chorus is listed as "G–D–Em–Bm–G–D–Em–F♯". I believe the 3rd chord in that progression is actually an F#. http://www.chordie.com/chord.pere/www.xguitar.com/guitar-tabs/eagles/hotel_california/hotel_california.txt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan asc (talk • contribs) 9:58, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Done Good catch. The source already cited in the relevant passage confirms your contention (as does a quick listen). RivertorchFIREWATER 13:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protected edit request on 05 September 2017: Error in chorus chord progression

[edit]

The recent edit to the chorus chord progression resulting in the updated progression of G-D-F#-Bm-G-D-Em-F# introduced an error to the Roman numeral representation of the chorus chord progression. The F# should be represented by "III" (the Roman numeral 3) rather than "ii" (lower case Roman numeral 2, which represented Em in the earlier version of the chord progression). Jkcncwiki (talk) 14:07, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hotel California/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Hi - I'll make copyedits as I go (please revert if I inadvertently change the meaning) and jot queries below Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Casliber: So what's up with the review?
Got sidetracked. Will get onto it soon. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:04, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
..and gave Don Henley and Glenn Frey each the resulting demo cassette. - "a" cassette each surely? actually "a resulting cassette" sounds odd too. "a copy of the recording"?
I fixed that. I think the song can be promoted now, if there aren't any other issues you feel need to be addressed.
who had replaced Bernie Leadon who left in 1975 - sounds odd with the two "who"s
...and the record company was reluctant to release it as a single because, at over six minutes, its duration far exceeds that of the songs generally played by radio stations - "exceeds" should be in past tense as everything else is in the sentence. Also "as a single" redundant as implied by the first part of the sentence.
Can "B Dorian" be linked anywhere?
Although the band members and Phillips met to discuss the project, tension between the two parties ended the pre-development deal for the film - left hanging...can this be elaborated upon?
@Casliber: I fixed all the problems you discussed and found no Wikipedia article for "B Dorian".
Earwigs looks ok, first one is a mirror, and others are inflated scores due to quotes. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:52, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required: - sources look ok, formatting the top 100 guitar solos one would be good (proper attribution etc).
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:


Overall:

Pass or Fail: - Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:55, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hotel California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:30, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seems the core of this song was taken from Jethro Tull (band)

[edit]

I don't have the guts to take on the fans and put it in the composition section. The Eagles even toured with Tull and listening to the Tull song 'We Used To Know' is where they got the foundations of Hotel California it seems. [1][2]

Reaper7 (talk) 21:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xny0Uj4--tk
  2. ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EBQ-ljFlt4
The music was written entirely by Don Felder who was not yet in the band when the Eagles and Jethro Tull toured together. So that part doesn't work. Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 14:02, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gold Record

[edit]

"Three months after its first release, the single was certified Gold by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), representing one million copies shipped."

A Gold Record is 500,000 sales.

https://www.riaa.com/gold-platinum/about-awards/

It was one million at the time. The certified units has changed over the years. For example, gold for digital single was only 100,000 before 2006. Hzh (talk) 01:47, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 March 2019

[edit]

Hi- I work the Digital Marketing for Don Felder and he simply would like to update his photo. I've just uploaded the new photo to WikiCommons. Links below.

File:Don Felder.jpg
Don Felder Hotel California

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Don_Felder.jpg

Please let us update the photo. It is harmless. Thank you! Mattwcoh (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)  Not done - Which Image needs doing Mattwcoh? RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 17:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Galgalatz's 1970s Top 100

[edit]

Hotel California ranked the third place in 2019 Galgalatz's 1970s Top 100 chart [1]. We should add it to the charts' paragraph in the article. Galgalaz2019 (talk) 09:41, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done I'm afraid this chart is on WP:BADCHARTS due to being a single network chart and incorporating user voting. --Muhandes (talk) 13:24, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "מצביעים מחדש למצעד עשור ה-70". Galgalatz (in Hebrew). Retrieved 17 August 2019.

The song has inspired a novel - worth including?

[edit]

I don't have the rights to edit this entry, so I thought I'd just mention the Ray Sullivan novel by the same name which posits a hypothetical island where old rock stars go when they've had enough of mainstream life. It's a good novel, btw. Link is: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07K7XC5BZ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deceangli (talk • contribs) 10:25, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A self-published book by a non-notable author is trivial. - SummerPhDv2.0 16:14, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unusual Recordings of this Song

[edit]

A few years ago, a pair of Hassidic singers swept Israel in a local reality show. Early in the contest they sang Hotel California. I thought somebody might find this interesting and pretty cool, actually.

https://www.mako.co.il/tv-the-next-star/video?subChannelId=c1c7d52c20902410VgnVCM2000002a0c10acRCRD&vcmid=b5f1828f871e1410VgnVCM2000002a0c10acRCRD

Steve — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sweisberg (talk • contribs) 10:05, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rock

[edit]

please change ((Rock)) to ((Rock music|Rock))

 Done – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:11, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Soft rock?

[edit]

The claim that it is the song is "soft rock" is sourced to an article that mentions it as a throw-away remark in a minor South African newspaper, I don't see how this can be used as credible source for the genre of the song. I think simply listing it as "rock" for its genre is good enough - e.g. here - [1], any other qualifier is superfluous, and the "soft rock" should therefore be removed. Hzh (talk) 20:19, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hotel_California&oldid=1252600733"