Talk:Bibliography of books critical of Islam: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
+archive box, move archiving code |
Update banner shell |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Old AfD multi |date=18 December 2019 |result='''keep''' |page=Bibliography of books critical of Islam}} |
{{Old AfD multi |date=18 December 2019 |result='''keep''' |page=Bibliography of books critical of Islam}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=List|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Books |
{{WikiProject Books}} |
||
{{WikiProject Lists|class=list}} |
{{WikiProject Lists|class=list}} |
||
{{WikiProject Bibliographies |
{{WikiProject Bibliographies |importance= }} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Islam|importance=low}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{archive box|auto=yes}} |
{{archive box|auto=yes}} |
||
Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
||
| minthreadsleft = 0}} |
| minthreadsleft = 0}} |
||
== Only include books which have their own articles == |
|||
The 2019 AfD which resulted in '''Keep''', but with many people implicitly invoking [[WP:CSC]] #1, namely {{tq|Every entry meets the notability criteria for its own article in the English Wikipedia. Red-linked entries are acceptable if the entry is verifiably a member of the listed group and it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming in the near future.}} The [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bibliography of books critical of Christianity|2019 AfD on "Bibliography of books critical of Christianity"]] also resulted in '''Keep''', but also with many people implicitly invoking [[WP:CSC]] #1. At [[Bibliography of books critical of Christianity]], this rule is being enforced, but here it hasn't. Therefore, I am going to do that now. [[User:Nederlandse Leeuw|Nederlandse Leeuw]] ([[User talk:Nederlandse Leeuw|talk]]) 18:25, 20 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:Disagree with the heading. What it ''does'' need is documented inclusion criteria. Bibliographies are a rare kind of list where I don't think we need dedicated articles for each listing (it's a bibliography, not an index, after all). Here's one possible criteria: |
|||
::Has a stand-alone article, or |
|||
::The author has a stand-alone article which mentions the book, or |
|||
::It is published by a reputable publisher and supported by at least two [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] indicating it is indeed critical of Islam. |
|||
::— <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\ 20:09, 20 May 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:58, 22 October 2024
This article was nominated for deletion on 18 December 2019. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Categories:
- List-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- List-Class List articles
- Unknown-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles
- List-Class Bibliographies articles
- Unknown-importance Bibliographies articles
- WikiProject Bibliographies
- List-Class Conservatism articles
- Low-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- List-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- List-Class Islam-related articles
- Low-importance Islam-related articles
- WikiProject Islam articles