Jump to content

Talk:Bibliography of books critical of Islam: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
+archive box, move archiving code
Update banner shell
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Old AfD multi |date=18 December 2019 |result='''keep''' |page=Bibliography of books critical of Islam}}
{{Old AfD multi |date=18 December 2019 |result='''keep''' |page=Bibliography of books critical of Islam}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=List|1=
{{WikiProject Books|class=list}}
{{WikiProject Books}}
{{WikiProject Lists|class=list}}
{{WikiProject Lists|class=list}}
{{WikiProject Bibliographies |class=List |importance= }}
{{WikiProject Bibliographies |importance= }}
{{WikiProject Islam|class=list|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Islam|importance=low}}
}}
}}
{{archive box|auto=yes}}
{{archive box|auto=yes}}
Line 15: Line 17:
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 0}}
| minthreadsleft = 0}}

== Only include books which have their own articles ==

The 2019 AfD which resulted in '''Keep''', but with many people implicitly invoking [[WP:CSC]] #1, namely {{tq|Every entry meets the notability criteria for its own article in the English Wikipedia. Red-linked entries are acceptable if the entry is verifiably a member of the listed group and it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming in the near future.}} The [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bibliography of books critical of Christianity|2019 AfD on "Bibliography of books critical of Christianity"]] also resulted in '''Keep''', but also with many people implicitly invoking [[WP:CSC]] #1. At [[Bibliography of books critical of Christianity]], this rule is being enforced, but here it hasn't. Therefore, I am going to do that now. [[User:Nederlandse Leeuw|Nederlandse Leeuw]] ([[User talk:Nederlandse Leeuw|talk]]) 18:25, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
:Disagree with the heading. What it ''does'' need is documented inclusion criteria. Bibliographies are a rare kind of list where I don't think we need dedicated articles for each listing (it's a bibliography, not an index, after all). Here's one possible criteria:
::Has a stand-alone article, or
::The author has a stand-alone article which mentions the book, or
::It is published by a reputable publisher and supported by at least two [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] indicating it is indeed critical of Islam.
::&mdash; <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\ 20:09, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:58, 22 October 2024