Jump to content

Talk:Sea of Japan: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
m Reverted 3 edits by 117.110.115.27 (talk) to last revision by Remsense
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 40: Line 40:
The East Sea of Korea is a sea that includes Ulleungdo and of course, Dokdo. The real Sea of Japan is a little sea more east from the East Sea of Korea. The real Sea of Japan includes battleship Island and part of Gushu. [[Special:Contributions/117.110.115.27|117.110.115.27]] ([[User talk:117.110.115.27|talk]]) 01:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
The East Sea of Korea is a sea that includes Ulleungdo and of course, Dokdo. The real Sea of Japan is a little sea more east from the East Sea of Korea. The real Sea of Japan includes battleship Island and part of Gushu. [[Special:Contributions/117.110.115.27|117.110.115.27]] ([[User talk:117.110.115.27|talk]]) 01:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' please provide [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:McYeee|McYeee]] ([[User talk:McYeee|talk]]) 02:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' please provide [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:McYeee|McYeee]] ([[User talk:McYeee|talk]]) 02:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 24 September 2024 (2) ==

{{Edit semi-protected|Sea of Japan|answered=yes}}
The East Sea of Korea is a Korean sea between Korea and Japan. The East Sea of Korea includes the Korean city of Pohang, Ulleungdo Island and of course, Dokdo. The real Sea of Japan is a tiny Sea that includes Kyushu and other small islands. [[Special:Contributions/117.110.115.27|117.110.115.27]] ([[User talk:117.110.115.27|talk]]) 01:35, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' please provide [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 01:39, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 29 September 2024 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Sea of Japan|answered=no}}
{{subst:trim|1=
<!-- State UNAMBIGUOUSLY your suggested changes below this line, preferably in a "change X to Y" format. Other editors need to know what to add or remove. Blank edit requests will be declined. -->

{{short description|Marginal sea between Japan, Russia and Korea}}
{{pp-semi-indef}}
{{pp-move}}
{{Infobox transliteration
| title = East Sea of Korea
| pic = [[File:East Sea of Korea Map en.png|250px]]
| piccap = East Sea of Korea map
| c = {{linktext|동|해}}
| p = Rìběn Hǎi
| kanji = 韓国東海
| hiragana = 東海 大韓民国です
| revhep = Nihon-kai
| nkhangul = {{linktext|조선|동해}}
| nkhanja = {{linktext|朝鮮|東海}}
| nkrr = Joseon Donghae
| nkmr = Chosŏn Tonghae
| nklk = East Sea of Korea
| skhangul = {{linktext|동해}}
| skhanja = {{linktext|東海}}
| skrr = Donghae
| skmr = Tonghae
| sklk = East Sea
| rus = [[wikt:японский|Японское]] [[wikt:море|море]]
| rusr = Восточное море Кореи

<!-- Write your request ABOVE this line and do not remove the tildes and curly brackets below. -->
}} [[Special:Contributions/117.110.115.27|117.110.115.27]] ([[User talk:117.110.115.27|talk]]) 23:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:48, 23 October 2024


A Closer Look at the East Sea Naming Controversy

[edit]

The preference for the term "East Sea" over "Sea of Japan" is rooted in a complex interplay of historical, cultural, and geopolitical considerations. The term, "East Sea," is advocated since it holds historical and cultural significance predating the colonial era, emphasizing a more inclusive regional perspective. Countries like South Korea view the use of "East Sea" as a means to assert their national identity and diminish the dominance of the "Sea of Japan" name, which is linked to a contentious colonial history. The parallel lies in the potential to evoke historical grievances and sensitivity; just as certain war criminal flags, such as Nazi flag and rising sun flag, may carry a contentious historical legacy, the naming of geographical features can be a source of geopolitical tension, reflecting deep-seated historical issues. Both situations highlights the need for nuanced discussions and diplomatic approaches to navigate complex historical narratives and foster understanding among nations. The choice of terminology is also seen as a way to navigate geopolitical sensitivities in the region, reducing potential tensions associated with historical disputes. Proponents suggest that adopting "East Sea" contributes to a more balanced and neutral international approach to the naming of this body of water, reflecting diverse perspectives and acknowledging the complexity of historical narratives. In essence, the naming debate transcends mere semantics, becoming a symbolic representation of identity, diplomacy, and historical consciousness in East Asia. 73.132.144.47 (talk) 15:04, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not the job of Wikipedia to make judgment calls on historical and cultural consciousness and sensitivity. These choices are made by the reliable sources which Wikipedia relies on. Wikipedia's job is to reflect the most common usage among reliable sources. In essence, your argument is with those reliable sources, not with Wikipedia. Westwind273 (talk) 11:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. Masterhatch (talk) 13:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not the job of Wikipedia to make judgement calls, but that doesn't mean Wikipedia should turn a blind eye to the atrocities committed by Imperial Japan. I mean, Wikipedia doesn't stand with the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei(the Nazi Party), nor does it stand with terrorist groups like the Taliban. In fact, Wikipedia articles openly condemn them.
When we talk about Imperial Japan, we talk about the sex slave issues, various massacres, human experiments, and other various atrocities that Japan has committed during World War ll. Yes, it's not the job of Wikipedia to make judgement calls, but there's a certain line between keeping it politically neutral and upholding a symbol of violence, crime, and injustice. 112.165.73.185 (talk) 14:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The English Wikipedia has its own guidelines (WP:COMMONNAME) and it is very unlikely the name of this article will change unless the usage of "East Sea" exceeds that of "Sea of Japan" on reliable secondary sources outside of the enwiki. If you truly believe that the name "Sea of Japan" must be banned for its association with Japan's war crimes then arguing on a Wikipedia talk page is a waste of time. Try convincing the US department of state and Encyclopedia Britannica first. 00101984hjw (talk) 00:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s wrong of name “Japan sea”

[edit]

It shouldn’t Japan Sea. Google will have to find th right name without being biased towards to any country. 2001:8003:421D:701:BD86:7CF6:531C:B06B (talk) 04:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sea of Japan is the common name in English, not Japan Sea. Masterhatch (talk) 04:49, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You do realize that that's not his/her point, right? 112.165.73.185 (talk) 14:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 September 2024

[edit]

The East Sea of Korea is a sea that includes Ulleungdo and of course, Dokdo. The real Sea of Japan is a little sea more east from the East Sea of Korea. The real Sea of Japan includes battleship Island and part of Gushu. 117.110.115.27 (talk) 01:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. McYeee (talk) 02:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]