Talk:Tachyon condensation: Difference between revisions
Assessment (Start): Physics (Rater) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
||
{{WikiProject Physics|importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==Comments== |
==Comments== |
||
Line 20: | Line 22: | ||
needs , at very least the intro, re write in language that people other then astrophysics phds can undertand |
needs , at very least the intro, re write in language that people other then astrophysics phds can undertand |
||
:I have a PhD in astrophysics, and I still get nothing out of this article [[Special:Contributions/202.140.199.194|202.140.199.194]] ([[User talk:202.140.199.194|talk]]) 07:08, 18 May 2020 (UTC) |
:I have a PhD in astrophysics, and I still get nothing out of this article [[Special:Contributions/202.140.199.194|202.140.199.194]] ([[User talk:202.140.199.194|talk]]) 07:08, 18 May 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Diagrams about Tachyon condensation is missing == |
|||
Check out the web page of the web link below and add the relevant images to the article "Tachyon condensation": |
|||
https://www.google.com/search?q=tachyon+condensation&udm=2 [[Special:Contributions/78.190.165.105|78.190.165.105]] ([[User talk:78.190.165.105|talk]]) 00:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:As Wikipedia is committed to [[free content|freely]] licensed materials, we can't just steal random diagrams from the internet, as tempting as that might be. |
|||
:Instead you can request for someone to make one or find a freely licensed or public domain diagram at [[WP:Requested images]]. I agree the article looks bare without illustration. [[User:Commander Keane|Commander Keane]] ([[User talk:Commander Keane|talk]]) 05:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:53, 23 October 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Comments
[edit]Actually, if you look at the QFT of a tachyonic field, you'd find it does not violate causality. However, it happens to be unstable with no lowest energy state. Phys 22:39, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- This second statement is not correct. Just because a field is tachyonic when expanded around a certain point of the potential does not mean that there is not a minimum. The Higgs field is such an example. Joshua Davis 06:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
How we can travel in time Palakula saitarun (talk) 07:22, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Merger
[edit]Maybe this article should be merged with tachyon? I'm not sure what the terminology is, but I would actually suggest that this becomes a subsection of tachyon. Joshua Davis 06:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Time
[edit]How to travel in time Palakula saitarun (talk) 07:26, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
article is incomprehensible jargon
[edit]I have a phd in molecular biology and can't make head or tail of this needs , at very least the intro, re write in language that people other then astrophysics phds can undertand
- I have a PhD in astrophysics, and I still get nothing out of this article 202.140.199.194 (talk) 07:08, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Diagrams about Tachyon condensation is missing
[edit]Check out the web page of the web link below and add the relevant images to the article "Tachyon condensation":
https://www.google.com/search?q=tachyon+condensation&udm=2 78.190.165.105 (talk) 00:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- As Wikipedia is committed to freely licensed materials, we can't just steal random diagrams from the internet, as tempting as that might be.
- Instead you can request for someone to make one or find a freely licensed or public domain diagram at WP:Requested images. I agree the article looks bare without illustration. Commander Keane (talk) 05:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)