Jump to content

Talk:Symphony in One Movement (Barber): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Created page with '{{Classical}}'
 
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. (Category:Articles with WikiProject banners but without a banner shell)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{Classical}}
{{WikiProject Classical music|composition=yes}}
}}
== Missing source? ==

In the third paragraph it is written: "The symphony is a condensed one movement version of a classical four movement symphony and is modeled after Sibelius' Symphony No. 7". The book "Samuel Barber - The composer and his music" by Barbara B. Heyman has a very similar formulation: "The work is a condensed version of the conventional four-movement symphony […], it shares shares a similarity with Sibelius's one-movement Symphony No. 7, which is in fact the model Barber used for this work."

Should this be added to the list of sources?--[[User:Herojoker|Hero Wanders]] ([[User talk:Herojoker|talk]]) 00:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:31, 25 October 2024

Missing source?

[edit]

In the third paragraph it is written: "The symphony is a condensed one movement version of a classical four movement symphony and is modeled after Sibelius' Symphony No. 7". The book "Samuel Barber - The composer and his music" by Barbara B. Heyman has a very similar formulation: "The work is a condensed version of the conventional four-movement symphony […], it shares shares a similarity with Sibelius's one-movement Symphony No. 7, which is in fact the model Barber used for this work."

Should this be added to the list of sources?--Hero Wanders (talk) 00:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]