Jump to content

Phase-space formulation: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
 
(166 intermediate revisions by 60 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Formulation of quantum mechanics}}
{{Quantum mechanics|cTopic=Formulations}}
{{Quantum mechanics|cTopic=Formulations}}
The '''phase space formulation''' of [[quantum mechanics]] is a physical theory, equivalent to the usual [[Schrödinger picture]] of quantum mechanics, that places [[position]] and [[momentum]] on equal footing, in [[phase space]]. The two key features of the phase space formulation are that the quantum state is described by a ''[[quasiprobability distribution]]'' (instead of a [[wave function]], [[state vector]], or [[density matrix]]) and operator multiplication is replaced by a ''[[Moyal product|star product]]''.


The '''phase-space formulation''' is a formulation of [[quantum mechanics]] that places the [[Position (vector)|position]] and [[momentum]] variables on equal footing in [[phase space]]. The two key features of the phase-space formulation are that the quantum state is described by a [[quasiprobability distribution]] (instead of a [[wave function]], [[Quantum state|state vector]], or [[density matrix]]) and operator multiplication is replaced by a [[Moyal product|star product]].
The theory was fully detailed by [[Hilbrand J. Groenewold| Hip Groenewold]] in 1946 in his PhD thesis,<ref name="Groenewold1946">H.J. Groenewold, "On the Principles of elementary quantum mechanics", ''Physica'','''12''' (1946) pp. 405-460. {{doi|10.1016/S0031-8914(46)80059-4}}</ref> with significant parallel contributions by [[José Enrique Moyal|Joe Moyal]],<ref name="Moyal1949">J.E. Moyal, "Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory", ''Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society'', '''45''' (1949) pp. 99–124. {{doi|10.1017/S0305004100000487}}</ref>, each building off earlier ideas by [[Hermann Weyl]]<ref name="Weyl1927">H.Weyl, "Quantenmechanik und Gruppentheorie", ''Zeitschrift für Physik'', '''46''' (1927) pp. 1–46, {{doi|10.1007/BF02055756}}</ref> and [[Eugene Wigner]].<ref name="Wigner1932">E.P. Wigner, "On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium", ''Phys. Rev.'' '''40''' (June 1932) 749–759. {{doi|10.1103/PhysRev.40.749}}</ref>


The theory was fully developed by [[Hilbrand J. Groenewold|Hilbrand Groenewold]] in 1946 in his PhD thesis,<ref name="Groenewold1946">{{Cite journal |doi = 10.1016/S0031-8914(46)80059-4 |bibcode = 1946Phy....12..405G |title = On the principles of elementary quantum mechanics |year = 1946 |last = Groenewold |first = H. J. |journal = Physica |volume = 12 |issue = 7 |pages = 405–460}}</ref> and independently by [[José Enrique Moyal|Joe Moyal]],<ref name="Moyal1949">{{Cite journal | doi=10.1017/S0305004100000487 |bibcode=1949PCPS...45...99M |title=Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory |year=1949 |last1=Moyal |first1=J. E. |last2=Bartlett |first2=M. S. |journal=Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society |volume=45 |issue=1 |pages=99–124|s2cid=124183640 }}</ref> each building on earlier ideas by [[Hermann Weyl]]<ref name="Weyl1927">{{Cite journal |doi = 10.1007/BF02055756 |bibcode = 1927ZPhy...46....1W |title = Quantenmechanik und Gruppentheorie |lang = de |year = 1927 |last = Weyl |first = H. |journal = Zeitschrift für Physik |volume = 46 |issue = 1–2 |pages = 1–46 |s2cid = 121036548}}</ref> and [[Eugene Wigner]].<ref name="Wigner1932">{{Cite journal |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.40.749 |bibcode=1932PhRv...40..749W |hdl=10338.dmlcz/141466 |title=On the Quantum Correction for Thermodynamic Equilibrium |year=1932 |last1=Wigner |first1=E. |journal=Physical Review |volume=40 |issue=5 |pages=749–759 |hdl-access=free}}</ref>
The chief advantage of the phase space formulation is that it makes quantum mechanics appear as similar to [[Hamiltonian mechanics]] as possible by avoiding the operator formalism, thereby "'freeing' the quantization of the 'burden' of the [[Hilbert space]]."<ref>S. T. Ali, M. Engliš, "Quantization Methods: A Guide for Physicists and Analysts." ''Rev.Math.Phys.'', '''17''' (2005) pp. 391-490. {{doi|10.1142/S0129055X05002376}}</ref> This formulation is statistical in nature and offers logical connections between quantum mechanics and classical statistical mechanics, enabling a natural comparison between the two (cf. [[classical limit]]). Quantum mechanics in phase space is often favored in certain [[quantum optics]] applications (see [[optical phase space]]), or in the study of [[decoherence]] and a range of specialized technical problems, though otherwise the formalism is less commonly employed in practical situations.<ref>{{cite doi|10.1142/S2251158X12000069|noedit}}</ref>


In contrast to the phase-space formulation, the [[Schrödinger picture]] uses the position ''or'' momentum representations (see also [[position and momentum space]]).
The conceptual ideas underlying the development of quantum mechanics in phase space have branched into mathematical offshoots such as [[deformation theory]] (cf. [[Kontsevich quantization formula]]) and [[noncommutative geometry]].


The chief advantage of the phase-space formulation is that it makes quantum mechanics appear as similar to [[Hamiltonian mechanics]] as possible by avoiding the operator formalism, thereby "'freeing' the quantization of the 'burden' of the [[Hilbert space]]".<ref>{{Cite journal |doi=10.1142/S0129055X05002376 |arxiv=math-ph/0405065 |title=Quantization Methods: A Guide for Physicists and Analysts |year=2005 |last1=Ali |first1=S. Twareque |last2=Engliš |first2=Miroslav |journal=Reviews in Mathematical Physics |volume=17 |issue=4 |pages=391–490 |s2cid=119152724}}</ref> This formulation is statistical in nature and offers logical connections between quantum mechanics and classical [[statistical mechanics]], enabling a natural comparison between the two (see [[classical limit]]). Quantum mechanics in phase space is often favored in certain [[quantum optics]] applications (see [[optical phase space]]), or in the study of [[decoherence]] and a range of specialized technical problems, though otherwise the formalism is less commonly employed in practical situations.<ref name="cz2012">{{Cite journal | last1 = Curtright | first1 = T. L. | last2 = Zachos | first2 = C. K. | doi = 10.1142/S2251158X12000069 | title = Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space | journal = Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter | volume = 01 | pages = 37–46 | year = 2012 | arxiv = 1104.5269 | s2cid = 119230734 }}</ref>
==Phase space distribution==
{{Main|Quasiprobability distribution}}
{{Main|Wigner quasiprobability distribution}}
{{Main|Wigner–Weyl transform}}
The phase space distribution ''f(x,p)'' of a quantum state is a quasiprobability distribution. In the phase space formulation, the phase-space distribution may be treated as the fundamental, primitive description of the quantum system, without any reference to wave functions or density matrices.<ref name="ZFC2005">[[Cosmas Zachos|C. Zachos]], D. Fairlie, and [[Thomas Curtright|T. Curtright]], "Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space" ( World Scientific, Singapore, 2005) ISBN 978-981-238-384-6 .</ref>


The conceptual ideas underlying the development of quantum mechanics in phase space have branched into mathematical offshoots such as Kontsevich's deformation-quantization (see [[Kontsevich quantization formula]]) and [[noncommutative geometry]].
There are several different ways to represent the distribution, all interrelated.<ref>{{cite doi|10.1063/1.1931206|noedit}}</ref> <ref name="AgarwalWolf1970b">G. S. Agarwal and E. Wolf "Calculus for Functions of Noncommuting Operators and General Phase-Space Methods in Quantum Mechanics. II. Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space", ''Phys. Rev. D'','''2''' (1970) pp. 2187–2205. {{doi|10.1103/PhysRevD.2.2187}}</ref> The most noteworthy is the [[Wigner quasiprobability distribution|Wigner representation]], ''W(x,p)'', discovered first.<ref name="Wigner1932" /> Other representations (in approximately descending order of prevalence in the literature) include the [[Glauber–Sudarshan P-representation|Glauber-Sudarshan P]],<ref>E. C. G. Sudarshan "Equivalence of Semiclassical and Quantum Mechanical Descriptions of Statistical Light Beams", ''Phys. Rev. Lett.'','''10''' (1963) pp. 277–279. {{doi|10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.277}}</ref><ref>R. J. Glauber "Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field", ''Phys. Rev.'','''131''' (1963) pp. 2766–2788. {{doi|10.1103/PhysRev.131.2766}}</ref> [[Husimi Q representation|Husimi Q]],<ref>Kôdi Husimi (1940). "Some Formal Properties of the Density Matrix", ''Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn.'' '''22''': 264-314 .</ref> Kirkwood-Rihaczek, Mehta, Rivier, and Born-Jordan representations.<ref>G. S. Agarwal and E. Wolf "Calculus for Functions of Noncommuting Operators and General Phase-Space Methods in Quantum Mechanics. I. Mapping Theorems and Ordering of Functions of Noncommuting Operators", ''Phys. Rev. D'','''2''' (1970) pp. 2161–2186. {{doi|10.1103/PhysRevD.2.2161}}</ref><ref>K. E. Cahill and R. J. Glauber "Ordered Expansions in Boson Amplitude Operators", ''Phys. Rev.'','''177''' (1969) pp. 1857–1881. {{doi|10.1103/PhysRev.177.1857}}</ref><ref>K. E. Cahill and R. J. Glauber "Density Operators and Quasiprobability Distributions", ''Phys. Rev.'','''177''' (1969) pp. 1882–1902. {{doi|10.1103/PhysRev.177.1882}}</ref> These alternatives are most useful when the Hamiltonian takes a particular form, such as [[normal order]] for the Glauber–Sudarshan P-representation. Since the Wigner representation is the most common, this article will usually stick to it, unless otherwise specified.


==Phase-space distribution==
By construction, the phase space distribution possesses properties akin to the probability density in a 2''n''-dimensional phase space. For example, it is ''real-valued'', unlike the generally complex-valued wave function. We can understand the probability of lying within a position interval, for example, by integrating the Wigner function over all momenta:
{{Main|Wigner quasiprobability distribution|Quasiprobability distribution|Wigner–Weyl transform}}
The phase-space distribution {{math|''f''(''x'', ''p'')}} of a quantum state is a quasiprobability distribution. In the phase-space formulation, the phase-space distribution may be treated as the fundamental, primitive description of the quantum system, without any reference to wave functions or density matrices.<ref name="ZFC2005">[[Cosmas Zachos|C. Zachos]], [[David Fairlie|D. Fairlie]], and [[Thomas Curtright|T. Curtright]], "Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space" (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005) {{isbn|978-981-238-384-6}}.</ref>


There are several different ways to represent the distribution, all interrelated.<ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = Cohen | first1 = L. | title = Generalized Phase-Space Distribution Functions | doi = 10.1063/1.1931206 | journal = Journal of Mathematical Physics | volume = 7 | issue = 5 | pages = 781–786 | year = 1966 |bibcode = 1966JMP.....7..781C }}</ref><ref name="AgarwalWolf1970b">{{Cite journal |doi = 10.1103/PhysRevD.2.2187|bibcode = 1970PhRvD...2.2187A|title = Calculus for Functions of Noncommuting Operators and General Phase-Space Methods in Quantum Mechanics. II. Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space|year = 1970|last1 = Agarwal|first1 = G. S.|last2 = Wolf|first2 = E.|journal = Physical Review D|volume = 2|issue = 10|pages = 2187–2205}}</ref> The most noteworthy is the [[Wigner quasiprobability distribution|Wigner representation]], {{math|''W''(''x'', ''p'')}}, discovered first.<ref name="Wigner1932" /> Other representations (in approximately descending order of prevalence in the literature) include the [[Glauber–Sudarshan P-representation|Glauber–Sudarshan P]],<ref>{{Cite journal |doi = 10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.277|bibcode = 1963PhRvL..10..277S|title = Equivalence of Semiclassical and Quantum Mechanical Descriptions of Statistical Light Beams|year = 1963|last1 = Sudarshan|first1 = E. C. G.|journal = Physical Review Letters|volume = 10|issue = 7|pages = 277–279}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |doi = 10.1103/PhysRev.131.2766|bibcode = 1963PhRv..131.2766G|title = Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field|year = 1963|last1 = Glauber|first1 = Roy J.|journal = Physical Review|volume = 131|issue = 6|pages = 2766–2788}}</ref> [[Husimi Q representation|Husimi Q]],<ref>Kôdi Husimi (1940). "Some Formal Properties of the Density Matrix", ''Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn.'' '''22''': 264–314.</ref> Kirkwood–Rihaczek, Mehta, Rivier, and Born–Jordan representations.<ref>{{Cite journal |doi = 10.1103/PhysRevD.2.2161|bibcode = 1970PhRvD...2.2161A|title = Calculus for Functions of Noncommuting Operators and General Phase-Space Methods in Quantum Mechanics. I. Mapping Theorems and Ordering of Functions of Noncommuting Operators|year = 1970|last1 = Agarwal|first1 = G. S.|last2 = Wolf|first2 = E.|journal = Physical Review D|volume = 2|issue = 10|pages = 2161–2186}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.177.1857|bibcode=1969PhRv..177.1857C|title=Ordered Expansions in Boson Amplitude Operators|year=1969|last1=Cahill|first1=K. E.|last2=Glauber|first2=R. J.|journal=Physical Review|volume=177|issue=5|pages=1857–1881|url=https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/1/33087070/1/PR177p18571.pdf}}; {{cite journal |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.177.1882|bibcode=1969PhRv..177.1882C|title=Density Operators and Quasiprobability Distributions|year=1969|last1=Cahill|first1=K. E.|last2=Glauber|first2=R. J.|journal=Physical Review|volume=177|issue=5|pages=1882–1902|url=http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33087076}}.</ref> These alternatives are most useful when the Hamiltonian takes a particular form, such as [[normal order]] for the Glauber–Sudarshan P-representation. Since the Wigner representation is the most common, this article will usually stick to it, unless otherwise specified.
:<math>\operatorname P [a \leq X \leq b] = \int_a^b \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} W(x,p) \, dp \, dx.</math>


The phase-space distribution possesses properties akin to the probability density in a 2''n''-dimensional phase space. For example, it is ''real-valued'', unlike the generally complex-valued wave function. We can understand the probability of lying within a position interval, for example, by integrating the Wigner function over all momenta and over the position interval:
If <math>\hat{A}(x,p)</math> is an operator representing an observable, we may map it into the phase space as <math>A(x,p)</math> using the ''[[Wigner–Weyl transform |Wigner transform]]''. Conversely, the operator may be restored via the ''[[Wigner–Weyl transform|Weyl transform]]''. We may take the expectation value of the observable with respect to the phase space distribution:<ref name="Moyal1949" /><ref>M. Lax "Quantum Noise. XI. Multitime Correspondence between Quantum and Classical Stochastic Processes", ''Phys. Rev.'','''172''' (1968) pp. 350–361. {{doi|10.1103/PhysRev.172.350}}</ref>


:<math>\langle A \rangle = \int A(x,p) W(x,p) \, dp \, dx.</math>
:<math>\operatorname P [a \leq X \leq b] = \int_a^b \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} W(x, p)\, dp\,dx.</math>


If {{math|''Â''(''x'', ''p'')}} is an operator representing an observable, it may be mapped to phase space as {{math|''A''(''x'', ''p'')}} through the ''[[Wigner–Weyl transform|Wigner transform]]''. Conversely, this operator may be recovered by the ''[[Wigner–Weyl transform|Weyl transform]]''.
A point of caution, however: despite the similarity in appearance, ''W''(''x'',''p'') is not a genuine [[joint probability distribution]], because regions under it do not represent mutually exclusive states as required in the [[probability axioms#Third axiom|third axiom of probability theory]]. Moreover, it can in general take ''[[negative probability|negative values]]'' even for pure states, with the unique exception of (optionally [[squeezed coherent state|squeezed]]) [[coherent states]], in violation of the [[probability axioms#First axiom|first axiom]]. Regions of such negative value are provable to be "small": they cannot extend to compact regions larger than a few ħ, and hence disappear in the [[classical limit]]. They are shielded by the [[uncertainty principle]], which does not allow precise localization within phase-space regions smaller than ħ, and thus renders such "negative probabilities" less paradoxical. If the left side of the equation is to be interpreted as an expectation value in the Hilbert space with respect to an operator, then in the context of [[quantum optics]] this equation is known as the [[optical equivalence theorem]]. For more details on the properties and interpretation of the Wigner function, see its [[Wigner quasiprobability distribution|main article]].

The expectation value of the observable with respect to the phase-space distribution is<ref name="Moyal1949" /><ref>{{Cite journal |doi = 10.1103/PhysRev.172.350|bibcode = 1968PhRv..172..350L|title = Quantum Noise. XI. Multitime Correspondence between Quantum and Classical Stochastic Processes|year = 1968|last1 = Lax|first1 = Melvin|journal = Physical Review|volume = 172|issue = 2|pages = 350–361}}</ref>

:<math>\langle \hat{A} \rangle = \int A(x, p) W(x, p) \, dp \, dx.</math>

A point of caution, however: despite the similarity in appearance, {{math|''W''(''x'', ''p'')}} is not a genuine [[joint probability distribution]], because regions under it do not represent mutually exclusive states, as required in the [[probability axioms#Third axiom|third axiom of probability theory]]. Moreover, it can, in general, take ''[[negative probability|negative values]]'' even for pure states, with the unique exception of (optionally [[squeezed coherent state|squeezed]]) [[coherent states]], in violation of the [[probability axioms#First axiom|first axiom]].

Regions of such negative value are provable to be "small": they cannot extend to compact regions larger than a few {{mvar|ħ}}, and hence disappear in the [[classical limit]]. They are shielded by the [[uncertainty principle]], which does not allow precise localization within phase-space regions smaller than {{mvar|ħ}}, and thus renders such "negative probabilities" less paradoxical. If the left side of the equation is to be interpreted as an expectation value in the Hilbert space with respect to an operator, then in the context of [[quantum optics]] this equation is known as the [[optical equivalence theorem]]. (For details on the properties and interpretation of the Wigner function, see its [[Wigner quasiprobability distribution|main article]].)

An alternative phase-space approach to quantum mechanics seeks to define a wave function (not just a quasiprobability density) on phase space, typically by means of the [[Segal–Bargmann space#The Segal–Bargmann transform|Segal–Bargmann transform]]. To be compatible with the uncertainty principle, the phase-space wave function cannot be an arbitrary function, or else it could be localized into an arbitrarily small region of phase space. Rather, the Segal–Bargmann transform is a [[holomorphic function]] of <math>x + ip</math>. There is a quasiprobability density associated to the phase-space wave function; it is the [[Husimi Q representation]] of the position wave function.


==Star product==
==Star product==
{{main|Moyal product}}
{{main|Moyal product}}
The fundamental noncommutative binary operator in the phase space formulation that replaces the standard operator multiplication is the [[Moyal product|star product]], represented by the symbol ★.<ref name="Groenewold1946" /> Each representation of the phase-space distribution has a ''different'' characteristic star product. For concreteness, we restrict this discussion to the star product relevant to the Wigner-Weyl representation.
The fundamental noncommutative binary operator in the phase-space formulation that replaces the standard operator multiplication is the [[Moyal product|star product]], represented by the symbol <small></small>.<ref name="Groenewold1946" /> Each representation of the phase-space distribution has a ''different'' characteristic star product. For concreteness, we restrict this discussion to the star product relevant to the Wigner–Weyl representation.

For notational convenience, we introduce the notion of [[Operator associativity|left and right derivatives]]. For a pair of functions ''f'' and ''g'', the left and right derivatives are defined as
: <math>
\begin{align}
f \overset{_\gets}\partial_x g & = \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \right) g, \\
f \vec\partial_x g & = f \left( \frac{\partial g}{\partial x}\right).
\end{align}
</math>


The [[Pseudo-differential_operator|differential definition]] of the star product is
For notational convenience, we introduce the notion of left and right derivatives. For a pair of functions f and g, the left and right derivatives are defined as
:<math>f \stackrel{\leftarrow }{\partial }_x g = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \cdot g</math>
: <math>f \star g = f \, \exp{\left(\frac{i \hbar}{2} \left(\overset{_\gets}\partial_x
\vec\partial_p - \overset{_\gets}\partial_p \vec\partial_x \right) \right)} g,</math>
:<math>f \stackrel{\rightarrow }{\partial }_x g = f \cdot \frac{\partial g}{\partial x}.</math>
where the argument of the exponential function can be interpreted as a [[power series]].
The differential definition of the star product is
:<math>f \star g = f \, \exp{\left( \frac{i \hbar}{2} (\stackrel{\leftarrow }{\partial }_x
\stackrel{\rightarrow }{\partial }_{p}-\stackrel{\leftarrow }{\partial }_{p}\stackrel{\rightarrow }{\partial }_{x}) \right)} \, g</math>
where the argument of the exponential function can be interpreted as a power series.
Additional differential relations allow this to be written in terms of a change in the arguments of ''f'' and ''g'':
Additional differential relations allow this to be written in terms of a change in the arguments of ''f'' and ''g'':

:<math>\begin{align}
: <math>\begin{align}
f(x,p) \star g(x,p) &= f\left(x+\frac{i \hbar}{2} \stackrel{\rightarrow }{\partial }_{p} , p - \frac{i \hbar}{2} \stackrel{\rightarrow }{\partial }_{x}\right) \cdot g(x,p) \\
&= f(x,p) \cdot g\left(x -\frac{i \hbar}{2} \stackrel{\leftarrow }{\partial }_{p} , p + \frac{i \hbar}{2} \stackrel{\leftarrow }{\partial }_{x}\right) \\
(f \star g)(x, p) &= f\left(x + \tfrac{i \hbar}{2} \vec\partial_p, p - \tfrac{i \hbar}{2} \vec\partial_x\right) \cdot g(x, p) \\
&= f\left(x +\frac{i \hbar}{2} \stackrel{\rightarrow }{\partial }_{p} , p\right) \cdot g\left(x -\frac{i \hbar}{2} \stackrel{\leftarrow }{\partial }_{p} , p\right) \\
&= f(x, p) \cdot g\left(x - \tfrac{i \hbar}{2} \overset{_\gets}\partial_p, p + \tfrac{i \hbar}{2} \overset{_\gets}\partial_x\right) \\
&= f\left(x , p - \frac{i \hbar}{2} \stackrel{\rightarrow }{\partial }_{x}\right) \cdot g\left(x , p + \frac{i \hbar}{2} \stackrel{\leftarrow }{\partial }_{x}\right).
&= f\left(x + \tfrac{i \hbar}{2} \vec\partial_p, p\right) \cdot g\left(x - \tfrac{i \hbar}{2} \overset{_\gets}\partial_p, p\right) \\
&= f\left(x, p - \tfrac{i \hbar}{2} \vec\partial_x\right) \cdot g\left(x, p + \tfrac{i \hbar}{2} \overset{_\gets}\partial_x\right).
\end{align}</math>
\end{align}</math>

It is also possible to define the ★-product in a convolution integral form,<ref>G. Baker, “Formulation of Quantum Mechanics Based on the Quasi-probability Distribution Induced on Phase Space,” ''Physical Review'', '''109''' (1958) pp.2198&ndash;2206. {{doi|10.1103/PhysRev.109.2198}}</ref> essentially through the [[Fourier transform]]:
It is also possible to define the <small>★</small>-product in a convolution integral form,<ref>{{Cite journal |doi = 10.1103/PhysRev.109.2198 |bibcode = 1958PhRv..109.2198B |title = Formulation of Quantum Mechanics Based on the Quasi-Probability Distribution Induced on Phase Space |year = 1958 |last = Baker |first = George A. |journal = Physical Review |volume = 109 |issue = 6 |pages = 2198–2206}}</ref> essentially through the [[Fourier transform]]:
:<math>f(x,p) \star g(x,p) = \frac{1}{\pi^2 \hbar^2} \, \int f(x+x',p+p') \, g(x+x'',p+p'') \, \exp{\left(\frac{2i}{\hbar}(x'p''-x''p')\right)} \, dx' dp' dx'' dp'' ~.</math>
: <math>(f \star g)(x, p) = \frac{1}{\pi^2 \hbar^2} \, \int f(x + x', p + p') \, g(x + x'', p + p'') \, \exp{\left(\tfrac{2i}{\hbar}(x'p'' - x''p')\right)} \, dx' dp' dx'' dp''.</math>
(Thus, e.g.,<ref name="ZFC2005" /> Gaussians compose [[Hyperbolic_function#Comparison_with_circular_trigonometric_functions|hyperbolically]],
(Thus, e.g.,<ref name="ZFC2005" /> Gaussians compose [[Hyperbolic function#Comparison with circular functions|hyperbolically]]:
: <math>
: <math>
\exp \left (-{a } (q^2+p^2)\right ) ~ \star ~
\exp\big({-a}(x^2 + p^2)\big) \star \exp\big({-b}(x^2 + p^2)\big) =
\exp \left (-{b} (q^2+p^2)\right ) = {1\over 1+\hbar^2 ab}
\frac{1}{1 + \hbar^2 ab} \exp\left(-\frac{a + b}{1 + \hbar^2 ab} (x^2 + p^2)\right),
\exp \left (-{a+b\over 1+\hbar^2 ab} (q^2+p^2)\right ) ,
</math>
</math>
or
or
: <math>
: <math>
\delta (q) ~ \star ~ \delta(p) = {2\over h}
\delta (x) \star \delta(p) = \frac{2}{h} \exp\left(2i\frac{xp}{\hbar}\right),
\exp \left (2i{qp\over\hbar}\right ) ,
</math>
</math>
etc.)
etc.)


The energy [[eigenstate]] distributions are known as ''stargenstates'', ''★-genstates'', ''stargenfunctions'', or ''★-genfunctions'', and the associated energies are known as ''stargenvalues'' or ''★-genvalues''. These are solved fin, analogously to the time-independent [[Schrödinger equation]], by the ★-genvalue equation<ref name="CFZ1998">{{cite doi|10.1103/PhysRevD.58.025002|noedit}}</ref><ref>{{cite doi|10.1017/S0305004100038068|noedit}}</ref><ref>N. C. Dias, J. N. Prata, "Formal solutions of stargenvalue equations", ''Annals of Physics'' '''311''' (2004) 120-151. {{doi|10.1016/j.aop.2003.11.004}}</ref><ref>M. de Gosson, F. Luef, "A new approach to the ★-genvalue equation", ''Lett. Math. Phys.'' '''85''' (2008) 173-183. {{doi|10.1007/s11005-008-0261-8}}</ref>
The energy [[eigenstate]] distributions are known as ''stargenstates'', <small></small>-''genstates'', ''stargenfunctions'', or <small></small>-''genfunctions'', and the associated energies are known as ''stargenvalues'' or <small></small>-''genvalues''. These are solved, analogously to the time-independent [[Schrödinger equation]], by the <small></small>-genvalue equation,<ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = Fairlie | first1 = D. B. | title = The formulation of quantum mechanics in terms of phase space functions | doi = 10.1017/S0305004100038068 | journal = Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society | volume = 60 | issue = 3 | pages = 581–586 | year = 1964|bibcode = 1964PCPS...60..581F | s2cid = 122039228 }}</ref><ref name="CFZ1998">{{Cite journal | last1 = Curtright | first1 = T. | last2 = Fairlie | first2 = D. | last3 = Zachos | first3 = C. | title = Features of time-independent Wigner functions | doi = 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.025002 | journal = Physical Review D | volume = 58 | issue = 2 | pages = 025002 | year = 1998 |arxiv = hep-th/9711183 |bibcode = 1998PhRvD..58b5002C | s2cid = 288935 }}</ref>
: <math>H \star W = E \cdot W,</math>

where {{mvar|H}} is the Hamiltonian, a plain phase-space function, most often identical to the classical Hamiltonian.
:<math>H \star W = E \cdot W,</math>
where ''H'' is the Hamiltonian, a plain phase-space function, most often identical to the classical Hamiltonian.


==Time evolution==
==Time evolution==
The time evolution of the phase space distribution is given by a quantum modification of [[Liouville's theorem (Hamiltonian)|Liouville flow]].<ref name="Moyal1949"/><ref name="AgarwalWolf1970b" /><ref>C. L. Mehta "Phase‐Space Formulation of the Dynamics of Canonical Variables", ''J. Math. Phys.'','''5''' (1964) pp. 677–686. {{doi|10.1063/1.1704163}}</ref> This formula can be obtained by applying the [[Wigner transformation]] to the density matrix version of the [[quantum Liouville equation]],
The [[time evolution]] of the phase space distribution is given by a quantum modification of [[Liouville's theorem (Hamiltonian)|Liouville flow]].<ref name="Moyal1949"/><ref name="AgarwalWolf1970b" /><ref>{{Cite journal |doi = 10.1063/1.1704163|bibcode = 1964JMP.....5..677M|title = Phase-Space Formulation of the Dynamics of Canonical Variables|year = 1964|last1 = Mehta|first1 = C. L.|journal = Journal of Mathematical Physics|volume = 5|issue = 5|pages = 677–686|doi-access = free}}</ref> This formula results from applying the [[Wigner transformation]] to the density matrix version of the [[quantum Liouville equation]],
the [[von Neumann equation]].
the von Neumann equation. In any representation of the phase space distribution with its associated star product, this is


In any representation of the phase space distribution with its associated star product, this is
:<math>\frac{\partial f}{\partial t} = - \frac{1}{i \hbar} \left(f \star H - H \star f \right),</math>

: <math>\frac{\partial f}{\partial t} = - \frac{1}{i \hbar} \left(f \star H - H \star f \right),</math>


or, for the Wigner function in particular,
or, for the Wigner function in particular,
: <math>
\frac{\partial W}{\partial t} = -\{\{W, H\}\} = -\frac{2}{\hbar} W \sin \left(\frac{\hbar}{2} (\overset{_\gets}\partial_x
\vec\partial_p - \overset{_\gets}\partial_p \vec\partial_x)\right) H =
-\{W, H\} + O(\hbar^2),
</math>
where <nowiki>{{&nbsp;,&nbsp;}}</nowiki> is the [[Moyal bracket]], the Wigner transform of the quantum commutator, while <nowiki>{&nbsp;,&nbsp;}</nowiki> is the classical [[Poisson bracket]].<ref name="Moyal1949" />


This yields a concise illustration of the [[correspondence principle]]: this equation manifestly reduces to the classical Liouville equation in the limit ''ħ''&nbsp;→&nbsp;0. In the quantum extension of the flow, however, ''the density of points in phase space is not conserved''; the probability fluid appears "diffusive" and compressible.<ref name="Moyal1949"/>
:<math>\frac{\partial W}{\partial t} = -\{\{W,H\}\} = -\frac{2}{\hbar} W \sin \left ( {{\frac{\hbar }{2}}(\stackrel{\leftarrow }{\partial }_x
The concept of quantum trajectory is therefore a delicate issue here.<ref> {{cite journal |author=M. Oliva, D. Kakofengitis, O. Steuernagel |year=2018 |title=Anharmonic quantum mechanical systems do not feature phase space trajectories |journal=Physica A | volume=502 |pages=201–210 |doi=10.1016/j.physa.2017.10.047 |bibcode=2018PhyA..502..201O |arxiv=1611.03303 |s2cid=53691877 }}</ref> See the movie for the Morse potential, below, to appreciate the nonlocality of quantum phase flow.
\stackrel{\rightarrow }{\partial }_{p}-\stackrel{\leftarrow }{\partial }_{p}\stackrel{\rightarrow }{\partial }_{x})} \right )
\ H =-\{W,H\} + O(\hbar^2),</math>
where <math>\{\{ \cdot , \cdot \}\}</math> is the [[Moyal bracket]] and <math>\{ \cdot , \cdot \}</math> is the classical [[Poisson bracket]].<ref name="Moyal1949" />


This yields a concise interpretation of the [[correspondence principle]], in that this equation manifestly reduces to the classical Liouville theorem in the limit ''ħ''→0. In the quantum extension of the flow, however, ''the density of points in phase space is not conserved'', so the notion of a quantum trajectory is hardly defined: the probability fluid is "diffusive".<ref name="Moyal1949"/> (The time evolution of the Wigner function may be formally solved for, among other ways, by the [[method of quantum characteristics]].<ref>M. I. Krivoruchenko, A. Faessler, '' Weyl's symbols of Heisenberg operators of canonical coordinates and momenta as quantum characteristics'', J. Math. Phys. 48, 052107 (2007) {{doi|10.1063/1.2735816}}.</ref><ref>{{cite doi|10.1088/1464-4266/5/3/381|noedit}}</ref>)
N.B. Given the restrictions placed by the uncertainty principle on localization, [[Niels Bohr]] vigorously denied the physical existence of such trajectories on the microscopic scale. By means of formal phase-space trajectories, the time evolution problem of the Wigner function can be rigorously solved using the path-integral method<ref>{{Cite journal |doi = 10.1016/0375-9601(91)90352-9 |title = A new type of phase-space path integral |journal = Physics Letters A |volume = 153 |issue = 1 |pages = 5–11 |year = 1991 |last = Marinov |first = M. S. |bibcode = 1991PhLA..153....5M}}</ref> and the [[method of quantum characteristics]],<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1063/1.2735816 |title=Weyl's symbols of Heisenberg operators of canonical coordinates and momenta as quantum characteristics |journal=Journal of Mathematical Physics |volume=48 |issue=5 |pages=052107 |year=2007 |last1=Krivoruchenko |first1=M. I. |last2=Faessler |first2=Amand |bibcode=2007JMP....48e2107K |arxiv=quant-ph/0604075 |s2cid=42068076}}</ref> although there are severe practical obstacles in both cases.


==Examples==
==Examples==

===Simple harmonic oscillator===
===Simple harmonic oscillator===
[[File:Wigner functions.jpg|thumb|The Wigner quasiprobability distribution for a simple harmonic oscillator with a) ''n''=0, b) ''n'' =1, and c) ''n'' =5.]]
{{main|quantum harmonic oscillator}}
{{main|quantum harmonic oscillator}}
[[File:Number state Wigner function.png|thumb|280px|Wigner function for number states a) ''n''&nbsp;=&nbsp;0, b) ''n''&nbsp;=&nbsp;1, and c) ''n''&nbsp;=&nbsp;19. Marginal distributions for ''x'' and ''p'' are recovered by integrating over ''p'' and ''x'' respectively.]]
The Hamiltonian for the simple harmonic oscillator in one spatial dimension in the Wigner-Weyl representation is
The Hamiltonian for the simple harmonic oscillator in one spatial dimension in the Wigner–Weyl representation is
:<math>H=\frac{1}{2}m \omega^2 x^2 + \frac{p^2}{2m}.</math>
: <math>H = \frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 x^2 + \frac{p^2}{2m}.</math>
The ★-genvalue equation reads

:<math>\begin{align}
The <small>★</small>-genvalue equation for the ''static'' Wigner function then reads
H \star W &= \left(\frac{1}{2}m \omega^2 x^2 + \frac{p^2}{2m}\right) \star W \\
: <math>\begin{align}
&= \left(\frac{1}{2}m \omega^2 \left( x+\frac{i \hbar}{2} \stackrel{\rightarrow }{\partial }_{p} \right)^2 + \frac{1}{2m}\left(p - \frac{i \hbar}{2} \stackrel{\rightarrow }{\partial }_{x}\right)^2\right) ~ W\\
&= \left( \frac{1}{2}m \omega^2 \left(x^2 - \frac{\hbar^2}{4} \stackrel{\rightarrow }{\partial }_{p}^2 \right) + \frac{1}{2m}\left( p^2 - \frac{\hbar^2}{4} \stackrel{\rightarrow }{\partial }_{x}^2 \right) \right) ~ W\\
H \star W &= \left(\frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 x^2 + \frac{p^2}{2m}\right) \star W \\
&\, \, \, \, \, + \frac{i \hbar}{2} \left(m \omega^2 x \stackrel{\rightarrow }{\partial }_{p} - \frac{p}{m} \stackrel{\rightarrow }{\partial }_{x}\right) ~ W \\
&= \left(\frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 \left(x + \frac{i \hbar}{2} \vec\partial_p\right)^2 + \frac{1}{2m}\left(p - \frac{i \hbar}{2} \vec\partial_x \right)^2\right) W \\
&= \left(\frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 \left(x^2 - \frac{\hbar^2}{4} \vec\partial_p^2\right) + \frac{1}{2m}\left(p^2 - \frac{\hbar^2}{4} \vec\partial_x^2 \right) \right) W \\
&= E \cdot W.
&\quad{} + \frac{i \hbar}{2} \left(m \omega^2 x \vec\partial_p - \frac{p}{m} \vec\partial_x\right) W \\
&= E \cdot W.
\end{align}</math>
\end{align}</math>

Consider first the imaginary part of the ★-genvalue equation.
{{multiple image
:<math>\frac{\hbar}{2} \left(m \omega^2 x \stackrel{\rightarrow }{\partial }_{p} - \frac{p}{m} \stackrel{\rightarrow }{\partial }_{x}\right) \cdot W=0</math>
| position = center
This implies that we may write the ★-genstates as functions of a single argument,
| width1 = 230
:<math>W(x,p)=F\left(\frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 x^2 + \frac{p^2}{2m}\right)=F(u).</math>
| image1 = TwoStateWF.gif
With this change of variables, it is possible to write the real part of the ★-genvalue equation in the form of a modified Laguerre equation, the solution of which involves the [[Laguerre polynomials]] as<ref name="CFZ1998" />
| caption1 = Time evolution of combined ground and 1st excited state Wigner function for the simple harmonic oscillator. Note the rigid motion in phase space corresponding to the conventional oscillations in coordinate space.
:<math>F_n(u) = \frac{(-1)^2}{\pi \hbar} L_n\left(\frac{u}{\hbar \omega}\right) e^{-u/\hbar \omega} ~,</math>
| width2 = 230
introduced by Groenewold in his paper, with associated ★-genvalues
| image2 = SmallDisplacedGaussianWF.gif
:<math>E_n = \hbar \omega \left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)~.</math>
| caption2 = Wigner function for the harmonic oscillator ground state, displaced from the origin of phase space, i.e., a [[coherent state]]. Note the rigid rotation, identical to classical motion: this is a special feature of the SHO, illustrating the [[correspondence principle]]. From the general pedagogy web-site.<ref>Curtright, T. L. [http://www.physics.miami.edu/~curtright/TimeDependentWignerFunctions.html Time-dependent Wigner Functions].</ref>
}}

Consider, first, the imaginary part of the <small>★</small>-genvalue equation,
: <math>\frac{\hbar}{2} \left(m \omega^2 x \vec\partial_p - \frac{p}{m} \vec\partial_x\right) \cdot W = 0</math>
This implies that one may write the <small>★</small>-genstates as functions of a single argument:
: <math>W(x, p) = F\left(\frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 x^2 + \frac{p^2}{2m}\right) \equiv F(u).</math>

With this change of variables, it is possible to write the real part of the <small>★</small>-genvalue equation in the form of a modified Laguerre equation (not [[Hermite polynomials#Wigner distributions of Hermite functions|Hermite's equation]]!), the solution of which involves the [[Laguerre polynomials]] as<ref name="CFZ1998" />
: <math>F_n(u) = \frac{(-1)^n}{\pi \hbar} L_n\left(4\frac{u}{\hbar \omega}\right) e^{-2u/\hbar \omega},</math>
introduced by Groenewold,<ref name="Groenewold1946" /> with associated <small>★</small>-genvalues
: <math>E_n = \hbar \omega \left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right).</math>

For the harmonic oscillator, the time evolution of an arbitrary Wigner distribution is simple. An initial {{math|''W''(''x'',&nbsp;''p'';&nbsp;''t'' {{=}} 0) {{=}} ''F''(''u'')}} evolves by the above evolution equation driven by the oscillator Hamiltonian given, by simply ''rigidly rotating in phase space'',<ref name="Groenewold1946" />
: <math>
W(x, p; t) = W(m\omega x \cos \omega t - p \sin \omega t, p \cos \omega t + \omega m x \sin \omega t; 0).</math>
[[File:Wigner function of simple harmonic oscillator.png|thumb|The Wigner function of a simple harmonic oscillator at different levels of excitations. The <math>(q, p)</math> are rescaled by <math>\sqrt{n+1}</math> in order to show that the Wigner function oscillates within that radius, and decays rapidly outside of that radius.]]
Typically, a "bump" (or coherent state) of energy {{math|''E'' ≫ ''ħω''}} can represent a macroscopic quantity and appear like a classical object rotating uniformly in phase space, a plain mechanical oscillator (see the animated figures). Integrating over all phases (starting positions at ''t''&nbsp;=&nbsp;0) of such objects, a continuous "palisade", yields a time-independent configuration similar to the above static <small>★</small>-genstates {{math|''F''(''u'')}}, an intuitive visualization of the [[classical limit]] for large-action systems.<ref name="cz2012"/>

The eigenfunctions can also be characterized by being rotationally symmetric (thus time-invariant) pure states. That is, they are functions of form <math>W(x,p) = f(\sqrt{x^2 + p^2})</math> that satisfy <math>W \star W = (2\pi \hbar)^{-1} W</math>.


===Free particle angular momentum===
===Free particle angular momentum===
Suppose a particle is initially in a minimally uncertain Gaussian state with the expectation values of position and momentum both centered at the origin in phase space. The Wigner function for such a state is
Suppose a particle is initially in a minimally uncertain [[Wave packet#Gaussian wavepackets in quantum mechanics|Gaussian state]], with the expectation values of position and momentum both centered at the origin in phase space. The Wigner function for such a state propagating freely is
:<math>W(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{p},t)=\frac{1}{(\pi \hbar)^3} \exp{\left( -\alpha^2 r^2 - \frac{p^2}{\alpha^2 \hbar^2}\left(1+\left(\frac{t}{\tau}\right)^2\right) + \frac{2t}{\hbar \tau} \mathbf{x} \cdot \mathbf{p}\right)}</math>
:<math>W(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{p};t)=\frac{1}{(\pi \hbar)^3} \exp{\left( -\alpha^2 r^2 - \frac{p^2}{\alpha^2 \hbar^2}\left(1+\left(\frac{t}{\tau}\right)^2\right) + \frac{2t}{\hbar \tau} \mathbf{x} \cdot \mathbf{p}\right)} ~,</math>
where ''α'' is a parameter describing the initial width of the Gaussian, and {{math|''τ'' {{=}} ''m''/''α''<sup>2</sup>''ħ''}}.
where α is a parameter describing the initial width of the Gaussian and <math>\tau=m/\alpha^2 \hbar</math>. Initially the position and momenta are uncorrelated. Thus in 3 dimensions, we expect the position and momentum vectors to be twice as likely to be perpendicular to each other as parallel. On the other hand, the position and momentum should become increasingly correlated as the state evolves because portions of the distribution far from the origin in position require a large amount of momentum to be reached. Indeed, it is possible to show that the kinetic energy of the particle becomes asymptotically radial only, in agreement with the usual quantum mechanical notion of the nonzero ground state angular momentum's orientation independence:<ref>J. P. Dahl and W. P. Schleich, "Concepts of radial and angular kinetic energies", ''Phys. Rev. A'','''65''' (2002). {{doi|10.1103/PhysRevA.65.022109}}</ref>

:<math>K_{rad}=\frac{\alpha^2 \hbar^2}{2m}\left(\frac{3}{2} - \frac{1}{1+(t/\tau)^2}\right)</math>
Initially, the position and momenta are uncorrelated. Thus, in 3 dimensions, we expect the position and momentum vectors to be twice as likely to be perpendicular to each other as parallel.
:<math>K_{ang}=\frac{\alpha^2 \hbar^2}{2m}\frac{1}{1+(t/\tau)^2}</math>

However, the position and momentum become increasingly correlated as the state evolves, because portions of the distribution farther from the origin in position require a larger momentum to be reached: asymptotically,
:<math>W \longrightarrow \frac{1}{(\pi\hbar)^3}\exp\left[-\alpha^2\left(\mathbf{x}-\frac{\mathbf{p}t}{m}\right)^2\right]\,.</math>

(This relative [[Squeezed coherent state|"squeezing"]] reflects the spreading of the free [[wave packet]] in coordinate space.)

Indeed, it is possible to show that the kinetic energy of the particle becomes asymptotically radial only, in agreement with the standard
quantum-mechanical notion of the ground-state nonzero angular momentum specifying orientation independence:<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Dahl | first1=Jens Peder | last2=Schleich | first2=Wolfgang P. |author-link2=Wolfgang P. Schleich| title=Concepts of radial and angular kinetic energies | journal=Physical Review A | volume=65 | issue=2 | date=2002-01-15 | issn=1050-2947 | doi=10.1103/physreva.65.022109 | page=022109| arxiv=quant-ph/0110134 | bibcode=2002PhRvA..65b2109D | s2cid=39409789 }}</ref>
:<math>K_\text{rad}=\frac{\alpha^2 \hbar^2}{2m}\left(\frac{3}{2} - \frac{1}{1+(t/\tau)^2}\right)</math>
:<math>K_\text{ang}=\frac{\alpha^2 \hbar^2}{2m}\frac{1}{1+(t/\tau)^2}~.</math>

===Morse potential===

The [[Morse potential]] is used to approximate the vibrational structure of a diatomic molecule.

[[File:Wigner function propagation for morse potential.ogv|400px|center|thumb|The [[Wigner quasiprobability distribution|Wigner function]] time-evolution of the [[Morse potential]] ''U''(''x'') = 20(1 − ''e''<sup>−0.16''x''</sup>)<sup>2</sup> in [[atomic units]] (a.u.). The solid lines represent [[level set]] of the [[Hamiltonian mechanics|Hamiltonian]] ''H''(''x'', ''p'') = ''p''<sup>2</sup>/2 + ''U''(''x'')''.]]

===Quantum tunneling===

[[Quantum tunneling|Tunneling]] is a hallmark quantum effect where a quantum particle, not having sufficient energy to fly above, still goes through a barrier. This effect does not exist in classical mechanics.

[[File:Wigner function for tunnelling.ogv|400px|center|thumb|The [[Wigner quasiprobability distribution|Wigner function]] for [[Quantum tunneling|tunneling]] through the potential barrier ''U''(''x'') = 8''e''<sup>−0.25''x''<sup>2</sup></sup> in [[atomic units]] (a.u.). The solid lines represent the [[level set]] of the [[Hamiltonian mechanics|Hamiltonian]] ''H''(''x'', ''p'') = ''p''<sup>2</sup>/2 + ''U''(''x'').]]

===Quartic potential===

[[File:Wigner function for quartic potential.ogv|400px|center|thumb|The [[Wigner quasiprobability distribution|Wigner function]] time evolution for the potential ''U''(''x'') = 0.1''x''<sup>4</sup> in [[atomic units]] (a.u.). The solid lines represent the [[level set]] of the [[Hamiltonian mechanics|Hamiltonian]] ''H''(''x'', ''p'') = ''p''<sup>2</sup>/2 + ''U''(''x'').]]

===Schrödinger [[cat state]]===
[[File:Wigner_function_of_a_Schrödinger_cat_state.gif|400px|center|thumb|Wigner function of two interfering coherent states evolving through the [[#Simple harmonic oscillator|SHO]] Hamiltonian. The corresponding momentum and coordinate projections are plotted to the right and under the phase space plot.]]


==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>


[[Category:Quantum mechanics]]
{{Quantum mechanics topics}}

[[Category:Hamiltonian mechanics]]
[[Category:Hamiltonian mechanics]]
[[Category:Symplectic geometry]]
[[Category:Symplectic geometry]]
[[Category:Mathematical quantization]]
[[Category:Mathematical quantization]]
[[Category:Foundational quantum physics]]
[[Category:Foundational quantum physics]]
[[Category:Articles containing video clips]]

Latest revision as of 04:24, 25 October 2024

The phase-space formulation is a formulation of quantum mechanics that places the position and momentum variables on equal footing in phase space. The two key features of the phase-space formulation are that the quantum state is described by a quasiprobability distribution (instead of a wave function, state vector, or density matrix) and operator multiplication is replaced by a star product.

The theory was fully developed by Hilbrand Groenewold in 1946 in his PhD thesis,[1] and independently by Joe Moyal,[2] each building on earlier ideas by Hermann Weyl[3] and Eugene Wigner.[4]

In contrast to the phase-space formulation, the Schrödinger picture uses the position or momentum representations (see also position and momentum space).

The chief advantage of the phase-space formulation is that it makes quantum mechanics appear as similar to Hamiltonian mechanics as possible by avoiding the operator formalism, thereby "'freeing' the quantization of the 'burden' of the Hilbert space".[5] This formulation is statistical in nature and offers logical connections between quantum mechanics and classical statistical mechanics, enabling a natural comparison between the two (see classical limit). Quantum mechanics in phase space is often favored in certain quantum optics applications (see optical phase space), or in the study of decoherence and a range of specialized technical problems, though otherwise the formalism is less commonly employed in practical situations.[6]

The conceptual ideas underlying the development of quantum mechanics in phase space have branched into mathematical offshoots such as Kontsevich's deformation-quantization (see Kontsevich quantization formula) and noncommutative geometry.

Phase-space distribution

[edit]

The phase-space distribution f(xp) of a quantum state is a quasiprobability distribution. In the phase-space formulation, the phase-space distribution may be treated as the fundamental, primitive description of the quantum system, without any reference to wave functions or density matrices.[7]

There are several different ways to represent the distribution, all interrelated.[8][9] The most noteworthy is the Wigner representation, W(xp), discovered first.[4] Other representations (in approximately descending order of prevalence in the literature) include the Glauber–Sudarshan P,[10][11] Husimi Q,[12] Kirkwood–Rihaczek, Mehta, Rivier, and Born–Jordan representations.[13][14] These alternatives are most useful when the Hamiltonian takes a particular form, such as normal order for the Glauber–Sudarshan P-representation. Since the Wigner representation is the most common, this article will usually stick to it, unless otherwise specified.

The phase-space distribution possesses properties akin to the probability density in a 2n-dimensional phase space. For example, it is real-valued, unlike the generally complex-valued wave function. We can understand the probability of lying within a position interval, for example, by integrating the Wigner function over all momenta and over the position interval:

If Â(xp) is an operator representing an observable, it may be mapped to phase space as A(x, p) through the Wigner transform. Conversely, this operator may be recovered by the Weyl transform.

The expectation value of the observable with respect to the phase-space distribution is[2][15]

A point of caution, however: despite the similarity in appearance, W(xp) is not a genuine joint probability distribution, because regions under it do not represent mutually exclusive states, as required in the third axiom of probability theory. Moreover, it can, in general, take negative values even for pure states, with the unique exception of (optionally squeezed) coherent states, in violation of the first axiom.

Regions of such negative value are provable to be "small": they cannot extend to compact regions larger than a few ħ, and hence disappear in the classical limit. They are shielded by the uncertainty principle, which does not allow precise localization within phase-space regions smaller than ħ, and thus renders such "negative probabilities" less paradoxical. If the left side of the equation is to be interpreted as an expectation value in the Hilbert space with respect to an operator, then in the context of quantum optics this equation is known as the optical equivalence theorem. (For details on the properties and interpretation of the Wigner function, see its main article.)

An alternative phase-space approach to quantum mechanics seeks to define a wave function (not just a quasiprobability density) on phase space, typically by means of the Segal–Bargmann transform. To be compatible with the uncertainty principle, the phase-space wave function cannot be an arbitrary function, or else it could be localized into an arbitrarily small region of phase space. Rather, the Segal–Bargmann transform is a holomorphic function of . There is a quasiprobability density associated to the phase-space wave function; it is the Husimi Q representation of the position wave function.

Star product

[edit]

The fundamental noncommutative binary operator in the phase-space formulation that replaces the standard operator multiplication is the star product, represented by the symbol .[1] Each representation of the phase-space distribution has a different characteristic star product. For concreteness, we restrict this discussion to the star product relevant to the Wigner–Weyl representation.

For notational convenience, we introduce the notion of left and right derivatives. For a pair of functions f and g, the left and right derivatives are defined as

The differential definition of the star product is

where the argument of the exponential function can be interpreted as a power series. Additional differential relations allow this to be written in terms of a change in the arguments of f and g:

It is also possible to define the -product in a convolution integral form,[16] essentially through the Fourier transform:

(Thus, e.g.,[7] Gaussians compose hyperbolically:

or

etc.)

The energy eigenstate distributions are known as stargenstates, -genstates, stargenfunctions, or -genfunctions, and the associated energies are known as stargenvalues or -genvalues. These are solved, analogously to the time-independent Schrödinger equation, by the -genvalue equation,[17][18]

where H is the Hamiltonian, a plain phase-space function, most often identical to the classical Hamiltonian.

Time evolution

[edit]

The time evolution of the phase space distribution is given by a quantum modification of Liouville flow.[2][9][19] This formula results from applying the Wigner transformation to the density matrix version of the quantum Liouville equation, the von Neumann equation.

In any representation of the phase space distribution with its associated star product, this is

or, for the Wigner function in particular,

where {{ , }} is the Moyal bracket, the Wigner transform of the quantum commutator, while { , } is the classical Poisson bracket.[2]

This yields a concise illustration of the correspondence principle: this equation manifestly reduces to the classical Liouville equation in the limit ħ → 0. In the quantum extension of the flow, however, the density of points in phase space is not conserved; the probability fluid appears "diffusive" and compressible.[2] The concept of quantum trajectory is therefore a delicate issue here.[20] See the movie for the Morse potential, below, to appreciate the nonlocality of quantum phase flow.

N.B. Given the restrictions placed by the uncertainty principle on localization, Niels Bohr vigorously denied the physical existence of such trajectories on the microscopic scale. By means of formal phase-space trajectories, the time evolution problem of the Wigner function can be rigorously solved using the path-integral method[21] and the method of quantum characteristics,[22] although there are severe practical obstacles in both cases.

Examples

[edit]

Simple harmonic oscillator

[edit]
Wigner function for number states a) n = 0, b) n = 1, and c) n = 19. Marginal distributions for x and p are recovered by integrating over p and x respectively.

The Hamiltonian for the simple harmonic oscillator in one spatial dimension in the Wigner–Weyl representation is

The -genvalue equation for the static Wigner function then reads

Time evolution of combined ground and 1st excited state Wigner function for the simple harmonic oscillator. Note the rigid motion in phase space corresponding to the conventional oscillations in coordinate space.
Wigner function for the harmonic oscillator ground state, displaced from the origin of phase space, i.e., a coherent state. Note the rigid rotation, identical to classical motion: this is a special feature of the SHO, illustrating the correspondence principle. From the general pedagogy web-site.[23]

Consider, first, the imaginary part of the -genvalue equation,

This implies that one may write the -genstates as functions of a single argument:

With this change of variables, it is possible to write the real part of the -genvalue equation in the form of a modified Laguerre equation (not Hermite's equation!), the solution of which involves the Laguerre polynomials as[18]

introduced by Groenewold,[1] with associated -genvalues

For the harmonic oscillator, the time evolution of an arbitrary Wigner distribution is simple. An initial W(xpt = 0) = F(u) evolves by the above evolution equation driven by the oscillator Hamiltonian given, by simply rigidly rotating in phase space,[1]

The Wigner function of a simple harmonic oscillator at different levels of excitations. The are rescaled by in order to show that the Wigner function oscillates within that radius, and decays rapidly outside of that radius.

Typically, a "bump" (or coherent state) of energy Eħω can represent a macroscopic quantity and appear like a classical object rotating uniformly in phase space, a plain mechanical oscillator (see the animated figures). Integrating over all phases (starting positions at t = 0) of such objects, a continuous "palisade", yields a time-independent configuration similar to the above static -genstates F(u), an intuitive visualization of the classical limit for large-action systems.[6]

The eigenfunctions can also be characterized by being rotationally symmetric (thus time-invariant) pure states. That is, they are functions of form that satisfy .

Free particle angular momentum

[edit]

Suppose a particle is initially in a minimally uncertain Gaussian state, with the expectation values of position and momentum both centered at the origin in phase space. The Wigner function for such a state propagating freely is

where α is a parameter describing the initial width of the Gaussian, and τ = m/α2ħ.

Initially, the position and momenta are uncorrelated. Thus, in 3 dimensions, we expect the position and momentum vectors to be twice as likely to be perpendicular to each other as parallel.

However, the position and momentum become increasingly correlated as the state evolves, because portions of the distribution farther from the origin in position require a larger momentum to be reached: asymptotically,

(This relative "squeezing" reflects the spreading of the free wave packet in coordinate space.)

Indeed, it is possible to show that the kinetic energy of the particle becomes asymptotically radial only, in agreement with the standard quantum-mechanical notion of the ground-state nonzero angular momentum specifying orientation independence:[24]

Morse potential

[edit]

The Morse potential is used to approximate the vibrational structure of a diatomic molecule.

The Wigner function time-evolution of the Morse potential U(x) = 20(1 − e−0.16x)2 in atomic units (a.u.). The solid lines represent level set of the Hamiltonian H(x, p) = p2/2 + U(x).

Quantum tunneling

[edit]

Tunneling is a hallmark quantum effect where a quantum particle, not having sufficient energy to fly above, still goes through a barrier. This effect does not exist in classical mechanics.

The Wigner function for tunneling through the potential barrier U(x) = 8e−0.25x2 in atomic units (a.u.). The solid lines represent the level set of the Hamiltonian H(x, p) = p2/2 + U(x).

Quartic potential

[edit]
The Wigner function time evolution for the potential U(x) = 0.1x4 in atomic units (a.u.). The solid lines represent the level set of the Hamiltonian H(x, p) = p2/2 + U(x).

Schrödinger cat state

[edit]
Wigner function of two interfering coherent states evolving through the SHO Hamiltonian. The corresponding momentum and coordinate projections are plotted to the right and under the phase space plot.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d Groenewold, H. J. (1946). "On the principles of elementary quantum mechanics". Physica. 12 (7): 405–460. Bibcode:1946Phy....12..405G. doi:10.1016/S0031-8914(46)80059-4.
  2. ^ a b c d e Moyal, J. E.; Bartlett, M. S. (1949). "Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory". Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 45 (1): 99–124. Bibcode:1949PCPS...45...99M. doi:10.1017/S0305004100000487. S2CID 124183640.
  3. ^ Weyl, H. (1927). "Quantenmechanik und Gruppentheorie". Zeitschrift für Physik (in German). 46 (1–2): 1–46. Bibcode:1927ZPhy...46....1W. doi:10.1007/BF02055756. S2CID 121036548.
  4. ^ a b Wigner, E. (1932). "On the Quantum Correction for Thermodynamic Equilibrium". Physical Review. 40 (5): 749–759. Bibcode:1932PhRv...40..749W. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.40.749. hdl:10338.dmlcz/141466.
  5. ^ Ali, S. Twareque; Engliš, Miroslav (2005). "Quantization Methods: A Guide for Physicists and Analysts". Reviews in Mathematical Physics. 17 (4): 391–490. arXiv:math-ph/0405065. doi:10.1142/S0129055X05002376. S2CID 119152724.
  6. ^ a b Curtright, T. L.; Zachos, C. K. (2012). "Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space". Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter. 01: 37–46. arXiv:1104.5269. doi:10.1142/S2251158X12000069. S2CID 119230734.
  7. ^ a b C. Zachos, D. Fairlie, and T. Curtright, "Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space" (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005) ISBN 978-981-238-384-6.
  8. ^ Cohen, L. (1966). "Generalized Phase-Space Distribution Functions". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 7 (5): 781–786. Bibcode:1966JMP.....7..781C. doi:10.1063/1.1931206.
  9. ^ a b Agarwal, G. S.; Wolf, E. (1970). "Calculus for Functions of Noncommuting Operators and General Phase-Space Methods in Quantum Mechanics. II. Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space". Physical Review D. 2 (10): 2187–2205. Bibcode:1970PhRvD...2.2187A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.2.2187.
  10. ^ Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1963). "Equivalence of Semiclassical and Quantum Mechanical Descriptions of Statistical Light Beams". Physical Review Letters. 10 (7): 277–279. Bibcode:1963PhRvL..10..277S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.277.
  11. ^ Glauber, Roy J. (1963). "Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field". Physical Review. 131 (6): 2766–2788. Bibcode:1963PhRv..131.2766G. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.131.2766.
  12. ^ Kôdi Husimi (1940). "Some Formal Properties of the Density Matrix", Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn. 22: 264–314.
  13. ^ Agarwal, G. S.; Wolf, E. (1970). "Calculus for Functions of Noncommuting Operators and General Phase-Space Methods in Quantum Mechanics. I. Mapping Theorems and Ordering of Functions of Noncommuting Operators". Physical Review D. 2 (10): 2161–2186. Bibcode:1970PhRvD...2.2161A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.2.2161.
  14. ^ Cahill, K. E.; Glauber, R. J. (1969). "Ordered Expansions in Boson Amplitude Operators" (PDF). Physical Review. 177 (5): 1857–1881. Bibcode:1969PhRv..177.1857C. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.177.1857.; Cahill, K. E.; Glauber, R. J. (1969). "Density Operators and Quasiprobability Distributions". Physical Review. 177 (5): 1882–1902. Bibcode:1969PhRv..177.1882C. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.177.1882..
  15. ^ Lax, Melvin (1968). "Quantum Noise. XI. Multitime Correspondence between Quantum and Classical Stochastic Processes". Physical Review. 172 (2): 350–361. Bibcode:1968PhRv..172..350L. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.172.350.
  16. ^ Baker, George A. (1958). "Formulation of Quantum Mechanics Based on the Quasi-Probability Distribution Induced on Phase Space". Physical Review. 109 (6): 2198–2206. Bibcode:1958PhRv..109.2198B. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.109.2198.
  17. ^ Fairlie, D. B. (1964). "The formulation of quantum mechanics in terms of phase space functions". Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 60 (3): 581–586. Bibcode:1964PCPS...60..581F. doi:10.1017/S0305004100038068. S2CID 122039228.
  18. ^ a b Curtright, T.; Fairlie, D.; Zachos, C. (1998). "Features of time-independent Wigner functions". Physical Review D. 58 (2): 025002. arXiv:hep-th/9711183. Bibcode:1998PhRvD..58b5002C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.025002. S2CID 288935.
  19. ^ Mehta, C. L. (1964). "Phase-Space Formulation of the Dynamics of Canonical Variables". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 5 (5): 677–686. Bibcode:1964JMP.....5..677M. doi:10.1063/1.1704163.
  20. ^ M. Oliva, D. Kakofengitis, O. Steuernagel (2018). "Anharmonic quantum mechanical systems do not feature phase space trajectories". Physica A. 502: 201–210. arXiv:1611.03303. Bibcode:2018PhyA..502..201O. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2017.10.047. S2CID 53691877.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  21. ^ Marinov, M. S. (1991). "A new type of phase-space path integral". Physics Letters A. 153 (1): 5–11. Bibcode:1991PhLA..153....5M. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(91)90352-9.
  22. ^ Krivoruchenko, M. I.; Faessler, Amand (2007). "Weyl's symbols of Heisenberg operators of canonical coordinates and momenta as quantum characteristics". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 48 (5): 052107. arXiv:quant-ph/0604075. Bibcode:2007JMP....48e2107K. doi:10.1063/1.2735816. S2CID 42068076.
  23. ^ Curtright, T. L. Time-dependent Wigner Functions.
  24. ^ Dahl, Jens Peder; Schleich, Wolfgang P. (2002-01-15). "Concepts of radial and angular kinetic energies". Physical Review A. 65 (2): 022109. arXiv:quant-ph/0110134. Bibcode:2002PhRvA..65b2109D. doi:10.1103/physreva.65.022109. ISSN 1050-2947. S2CID 39409789.