Jump to content

Talk:Bahrain: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
PrimeBOT (talk | contribs)
m top: Task 24: banner removal following a TFD
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(26 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header|archive_age=4|archive_units=months|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}}
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Geography|class=C}}
{{Calm}}
{{Calm}}
{{British English}}
{{British English}}
Line 41: Line 40:
|otd15date=2019-12-16|otd15oldid=930937782
|otd15date=2019-12-16|otd15oldid=930937782
}}
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Bahrain|class=B|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Bahrain|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Countries
{{WikiProject Countries}}
{{WikiProject Islands}}
| class = B
{{WikiProject Islam|importance=High}}
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = no
{{WikiProject Arab world|importance=Top}}
| b2 <!--Coverage and accuracy --> = yes
{{WikiProject Asia|importance=Top}}
| b3 <!--Structure --> = yes
{{WikiProject Western Asia|importance= Top}}
| b4 <!--Grammar and style --> = yes
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = yes
| b6 <!--Accessible --> = yes}}
{{WikiProject Islands|class=B}}
{{WikiProject Arab world|class=B|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Asia|class=B|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Western Asia |class= B |importance= Top}}
}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
Line 69: Line 62:
}}
}}


== Semi-protected edit request ==
== Map inset is incorrect ==


The [[:File:Map of Bahrain.svg|map used in the sidebar]] has a strange inset. The world map has a rectangle that covers an area from Egypt to India. But the larger map is only a fraction of this. Not accurate or helpful. I realize it's difficult for a country this small. [[Special:Contributions/2401:7000:DB0D:3900:58C:C232:8442:549F|2401:7000:DB0D:3900:58C:C232:8442:549F]] ([[User talk:2401:7000:DB0D:3900:58C:C232:8442:549F|talk]]) 03:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Please add <nowiki>{{pp-semi|small=yes}}</nowiki> at the top of the page. [[User:TheGreatAustralian|TheGreatAustralian]] ([[User talk:TheGreatAustralian|talk]]) 01:01, 6 July 2022 (UTC)


== Visualization ==
== Missing text? ==


This paragraph under Post-Arab Spring years seems to have had text cut from it, between the words "committee to" and the word "paying". As is, it doesn't make much sense:
The Religion in Bahrain pie chart label says 69.7% are Muslim, but the pie chart itself looks more like 50%. Any idea why? [[User:Futuristcorporation|The Futurist Corporation]] ([[User talk:Futuristcorporation|talk]]) 12:53, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
"On 9 April 2020, Bahrain launched a committee to paying private-sector employees for a three-month period in order to ease the financial pain caused by the [[COVID-19 pandemic]]."


What to do? [[User:Will-o-the-west|Will-o-the-west]] ([[User talk:Will-o-the-west|talk]]) 20:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
:It's rendering a horizontal and vertical line which shouldn't be there, but the green is still clearly covering nearly three-quarters of the pie. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 13:32, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


:It was added all in one go by an IP [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Bahrain&diff=prev&oldid=1152600428 here], so probably just a grammar issue trying to say that the government supported private-sector employment. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 01:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* [[commons:File:Bahrain Product Exports (2019).svg|Bahrain Product Exports (2019).svg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2023-03-23T14:42:16.416189 | Bahrain Product Exports (2019).svg -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dave-landry-datawheel|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 14:42, 23 March 2023 (UTC)


== Military - "Small but professional and well-0rganised" ==
== So many men ==


Could someone more experienced in editing than me explain if this is a good choice of words? It seems overly subjective to me. I would assume a military is professional unless there is evidence to the contrary. [[User:Robhold2000|Robhold2000]] ([[User talk:Robhold2000|talk]]) 06:42, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
This article and the main article on demography show the huge excess of adult men in Bahrain, but say nothing about this in words. Are the non-citizens, the temporary residents all male? In the ages below 20, the gender split is as one might expect, more less evenly split. Then above 20, there is an excess of men. I do not know the nation, and cannot find any commentary on this imbalance. - - [[User:Prairieplant|Prairieplant]] ([[User talk:Prairieplant|talk]]) 16:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)


== North Americans? And the whole continental grouping ==
== Semi-protected edit request (31/8/23) ==


Thats not really an Ethnicity is it? I get the whole continental thing but its kinda weird. Continents are a really bad grouping of ethnicities anyways. Asians could be chinese or indian, completely unrelated, as could Africa be north african arabs or sub saharans. This metric is inefficient in providing info, and kinda useless [[User:DirkjanenBert|DirkjanenBert]] ([[User talk:DirkjanenBert|talk]]) 15:12, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
I request that the page could be semi-protected due to vandalism. [[User:Ebraali444|Ebraali444]] ([[User talk:Ebraali444|talk]]) 07:04, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:40, 25 October 2024

Former good articleBahrain was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 29, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
October 6, 2012Good article nomineeListed
January 20, 2021Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 16, 2004, December 16, 2005, December 16, 2006, December 16, 2007, December 16, 2008, December 16, 2009, December 16, 2010, December 16, 2012, December 16, 2013, December 16, 2014, December 16, 2015, December 16, 2016, December 16, 2017, December 16, 2018, and December 16, 2019.
Current status: Delisted good article


Map inset is incorrect

[edit]

The map used in the sidebar has a strange inset. The world map has a rectangle that covers an area from Egypt to India. But the larger map is only a fraction of this. Not accurate or helpful. I realize it's difficult for a country this small. 2401:7000:DB0D:3900:58C:C232:8442:549F (talk) 03:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Missing text?

[edit]

This paragraph under Post-Arab Spring years seems to have had text cut from it, between the words "committee to" and the word "paying". As is, it doesn't make much sense: "On 9 April 2020, Bahrain launched a committee to paying private-sector employees for a three-month period in order to ease the financial pain caused by the COVID-19 pandemic."

What to do? Will-o-the-west (talk) 20:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was added all in one go by an IP here, so probably just a grammar issue trying to say that the government supported private-sector employment. CMD (talk) 01:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Military - "Small but professional and well-0rganised"

[edit]

Could someone more experienced in editing than me explain if this is a good choice of words? It seems overly subjective to me. I would assume a military is professional unless there is evidence to the contrary. Robhold2000 (talk) 06:42, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

North Americans? And the whole continental grouping

[edit]

Thats not really an Ethnicity is it? I get the whole continental thing but its kinda weird. Continents are a really bad grouping of ethnicities anyways. Asians could be chinese or indian, completely unrelated, as could Africa be north african arabs or sub saharans. This metric is inefficient in providing info, and kinda useless DirkjanenBert (talk) 15:12, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]