Jump to content

Talk:Supply chain management: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BJ2352 (talk | contribs)
 
(120 intermediate revisions by 74 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
==Proposed merge from [[Supply chain event management]]==
{{afd-merged-from|Certified Supply Chain Professional|Certified Supply Chain Professional (2nd nomination)|8 February 2016}}
Any comments on the proposal? - [[User:Nzd|N]] [[User talk:Nzd|(talk)]] 03:57, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
{{afd-merged-from|Certified Supply Chain Professional|Certified Supply Chain Professional|20 May 2014}}
:No arguments against, so I am merging. --[[User:Ezeu|Ezeu]] 22:18, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Business|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Trade|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Globalization|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Systems|field=systems|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Engineering |importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Economics|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Retailing|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Materials|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Transport|importance=Top}}
}}
{{backwardscopy|title=Material Management|author=Pawan Arora|date=2009|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=cf4DClLxC2UC&pg=PR3&dq=Pawan+Arora,+2009,+%27%27Material+Management%27%27&hl=en&ei=acUITYGWJcP98Aaz28SJAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=consideration%20of%20all%20possible%20events%20&f=false|comments=This book is copyrighted to 2009. Content it uses pre-exists than in the article. For instance, it incorporates at page 60 the sentences, "Supply chain event management (abbreviated as SCEM) is a consideration of all possible events and factors that can disrupt a supply chain. With SCEM possible scenarios can be created and solutions devised." We can clearly see the evolution of this content on Wikipedia. The germ of this sentence was first merged into this article [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Supply_chain_management&action=historysubmit&diff=38371279&oldid=38144595 in February 2006], having been authored at [[Supply chain event management]] in [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Supply_chain_event_management&oldid=23535975 September 2005]. In 2006, the content read, "Supply chain event management (abbreviated as '''SCEM''') is a consideration of all possible occurring events and factors that can cause a disruption in a supply chain. With SCEM possible scenarios can be created and solutions can be planned." That content remained fairly stable until September 2009, when it was copy-edited [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Supply_chain_management&action=historysubmit&diff=311443225&oldid=310466441 here] into the form it appears in print. The sentence prior in the source enterered the article [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Supply_chain_management&action=historysubmit&diff=199092966&oldid=199013641 in March 2008], with the seed having entered another article [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Supply_chain_management_software&diff=next&oldid=141025192 in June 2007]. There can be little doube that Arora has copied content from Wikipedia. [[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 13:56, 15 December 2010 (UTC)}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Supply chain management/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}


== Topics addressed by selected professional supply chain certification programmes ==
any suggestion on where to get used book for CPIM certification


Article has a note from October 2017 proposing a [[Wikipedia:Splitting|split]] for the material on '''professional supply chain certification programmes'''. The proposal discussion is [[Talk:Supply chain management/Archives/2017#Comparison of supply chain certification programmes|archived]] with no discussion other that the split proposal by [[User:Biogeographist|Biogeographist]]. I '''agree''' that the table seems too large and specific for this article and support the proposed split, but I would call the article "Supply chain certification programmes" without the reference to "comparisons". - [[User:BobKilcoyne|BobKilcoyne]] ([[User talk:BobKilcoyne|talk]]) 05:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
==Proposed merge with [[Bullwhip effect]]==
This seems like a particular side effect or subtopic of [[Supply chain management]] not critical to the topic itself. It seems like merging it would simply diminish interest in the subtopic. I would be opposed to merging. [[User:Avt tor|Avt tor]] 16:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
:I would oppose merging it too. Besides diluting the topic, I think Bullwhip Effect should be discussed by itself and the importance conveyed. There are other spin-offs of SCM similar to Bullwhip Effect which would then be qualified to enter this article. [[User:Nshuks7|Nshuks7]] 08:25, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
::I also oppose merging the Bullwhip Effect page with the general page for supply chain management. The bullwhip effect is important enough to warrant its own entry in wikipedia, yet it is not so central to the field that it warrants inclusion on the SCM page. [[User:Sonicace|Sonicace]] 03:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


'''Agree''' [[User:TolWol56|TolWol56]] ([[User talk:TolWol56|talk]]) 21:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
== Merge from [[Supply chain diversification]] ==


:{{ping|Biogeographist|BobKilcoyne|TolWol56}} I'd be happy to help effect the split, given that it seems to have consensus. However, the current section "Organisation", which would presumably form the basis of the new page, seems to be based entirely on a single 2009 book on the topic, which would be a little thin for a standalone article. Do any of you have some sources which could be used to build the new page, or would even be able to sketch up a draft? [[User:Felix QW|Felix QW]] ([[User talk:Felix QW|talk]]) 15:26, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
A merge from [[Supply chain diversification]] has been proposed. This proposal comes after the proposal to have the said article merged with the article on [[Procurement]] in wich I voted against, but suggested considering the merger with this article instead. The tone of the two articles seem non-cohesive, probably because the point of view is of management v.s. operations. I would like to get some imput on this merger. --[[User:Emana|Emana]] 17:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
::There seems to be some scholarly work on the topic, such as [https://www.scielo.br/j/prod/a/LW3fNxVVCTLTqT5c59RtCfn/?format=pdf&lang=en this], so I suspect notability is not an issue. [[User:Felix QW|Felix QW]] ([[User talk:Felix QW|talk]]) 15:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
: Nobody has given their opinion on this issue for three weeks. Under normal Wikipedia circumstances, the merge will happen, but in the case of this article, there has been so much more content added to it since the proposal of the merger. The new content added veers away from the tone and issue that prompted this merger. In my opinion the merger is no longer appropriate. Therefore, I will rescind the proposal. Remember, the merger can be proposed again by anyone who wishes to do so. --[[User:Emana|Emana]] 17:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
'''Disagree''' with my own split proposal: Actually, I would suggest just removing the {{tl|split}} template and keeping the table in this article. I suggested the split so long ago that I don't even remember doing it, and I've changed my mind: now I think the table is not big enough for a separate article. However, I still agree with [[Talk:Supply chain management/Archives/2017#Comparison of supply chain certification programmes|the formatting changes that I suggested]]. Thanks for drawing attention to this. [[User:Biogeographist|Biogeographist]] ([[User talk:Biogeographist|talk]]) 20:09, 28 May 2023 (UTC)


:Is the level of detail set out in the table still required? The terms "high" and "low" are not defined. What do they actually mean? The only reference cited in this section is Jacoby's 2009 ''Guide''. Is all this detail cited in Jacoby? If so it is going to be out-of-date? Tramaricoa ''et al'''s analysis looking at preferences and relevance to SCM is a useful reference but does not list topics to the extent covered by this table. I would prefer to remove the table completely. [[User:BobKilcoyne|BobKilcoyne]] ([[User talk:BobKilcoyne|talk]]) 02:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)


==Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SU22 - Sect 202 - Tue==
I do not think that the merge should be done, since SCM is a very particular topic of the operation management.
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/New_York_University/Research_Process_and_Methodology_-_SU22_-_Sect_202_-_Tue_(Summer) | assignments = [[User:Ninamn7|Ninamn7]] | start_date = 2022-07-04 | end_date = 2022-08-16 }}


<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:OneGoodNut|OneGoodNut]] ([[User talk:OneGoodNut|talk]]) 17:28, 23 July 2022 (UTC)</span>
== SCM Solutions comparison ==


==Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 200 - Thu==
SCM solutions are many. Which one is better and Why? SAP or i2 <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/221.128.181.120|221.128.181.120]] ([[User talk:Arun|talk]]) 18:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/New_York_University/Research_Process_and_Methodology_-_FA22_-_Sect_200_-_Thu_(Fall_2022) | assignments = [[User:BL33701|BL33701]] | start_date = 2022-09-22 | end_date = 2022-12-08 }}
It would not be wise to merge these topics

<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:BL33701|BL33701]] ([[User talk:BL33701|talk]]) 03:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)</span>

==Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SU24 - Sect 200 - Thu==
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/New_York_University/Research_Process_and_Methodology_-_SU24_-_Sect_200_-_Thu_(Summer_2024) | assignments = [[User:Zhilin0321|Zhilin0321]] | start_date = 2024-05-22 | end_date = 2024-08-24 }}

<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:Zq2197|Zq2197]] ([[User talk:Zq2197|talk]]) 04:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC)</span>

==Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA24 - Sect 200 - Thu==
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/New_York_University/Research_Process_and_Methodology_-_FA24_-_Sect_200_-_Thu_(Fall) | assignments = [[User:BJ2352|BJ2352]] | start_date = 2024-09-05 | end_date = 2024-12-13 }}

<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:BJ2352|BJ2352]] ([[User talk:BJ2352|talk]]) 20:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)</span>

Latest revision as of 20:07, 26 October 2024

Topics addressed by selected professional supply chain certification programmes

[edit]

Article has a note from October 2017 proposing a split for the material on professional supply chain certification programmes. The proposal discussion is archived with no discussion other that the split proposal by Biogeographist. I agree that the table seems too large and specific for this article and support the proposed split, but I would call the article "Supply chain certification programmes" without the reference to "comparisons". - BobKilcoyne (talk) 05:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree TolWol56 (talk) 21:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Biogeographist, BobKilcoyne, and TolWol56: I'd be happy to help effect the split, given that it seems to have consensus. However, the current section "Organisation", which would presumably form the basis of the new page, seems to be based entirely on a single 2009 book on the topic, which would be a little thin for a standalone article. Do any of you have some sources which could be used to build the new page, or would even be able to sketch up a draft? Felix QW (talk) 15:26, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There seems to be some scholarly work on the topic, such as this, so I suspect notability is not an issue. Felix QW (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree with my own split proposal: Actually, I would suggest just removing the {{split}} template and keeping the table in this article. I suggested the split so long ago that I don't even remember doing it, and I've changed my mind: now I think the table is not big enough for a separate article. However, I still agree with the formatting changes that I suggested. Thanks for drawing attention to this. Biogeographist (talk) 20:09, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is the level of detail set out in the table still required? The terms "high" and "low" are not defined. What do they actually mean? The only reference cited in this section is Jacoby's 2009 Guide. Is all this detail cited in Jacoby? If so it is going to be out-of-date? Tramaricoa et al's analysis looking at preferences and relevance to SCM is a useful reference but does not list topics to the extent covered by this table. I would prefer to remove the table completely. BobKilcoyne (talk) 02:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SU22 - Sect 202 - Tue

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 July 2022 and 16 August 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ninamn7 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by OneGoodNut (talk) 17:28, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 200 - Thu

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BL33701 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by BL33701 (talk) 03:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SU24 - Sect 200 - Thu

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 May 2024 and 24 August 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Zhilin0321 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Zq2197 (talk) 04:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA24 - Sect 200 - Thu

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2024 and 13 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BJ2352 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by BJ2352 (talk) 20:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]