Allais effect: Difference between revisions
Citation bot (talk | contribs) m Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were actually parameter name changes.| You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here.| Activated by User:Headbomb |
some cleanup |
||
(35 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Alleged anomalous behavior of pendulums and gravimeters}} |
|||
{{distinguish|text=the [[Allais paradox]] in economics, which is also sometimes referred to as the "Allais effect" |
{{distinguish|text=the [[Allais paradox]] in economics, which is also sometimes referred to as the "Allais effect"}} |
||
{{Expert attention|Physics|reason=The nature of the effect is not described|date=June 2022}} |
|||
[[Image:litbourgeot.jpg|frame|right|Allais' [[paraconical pendulum]]]] |
[[Image:litbourgeot.jpg|frame|right|Allais' [[paraconical pendulum]]]] |
||
[[Image:Solar eclipse 1999 4 |
[[Image:Solar eclipse 1999 4.jpg|thumb|upright=1.15|Photo taken during the French 1999 eclipse]] |
||
The '''Allais effect''' is the alleged anomalous behavior of [[pendulums]] or [[gravimeters]] which is sometimes purportedly observed during a [[solar eclipse]]. The effect was first reported as an anomalous [[precession]] of the plane of [[oscillation]] of a [[Foucault pendulum]] during the [[solar eclipse of June 30, 1954]] by [[Maurice Allais]], a [[France|French]] [[polymath]] who |
The '''Allais effect''' is the alleged anomalous behavior of [[pendulums]] or [[gravimeters]] which is sometimes purportedly observed during a [[solar eclipse]]. The effect was first reported as an anomalous [[precession]] of the plane of [[oscillation]] of a [[Foucault pendulum]] during the [[solar eclipse of June 30, 1954]] by [[Maurice Allais]], a [[France|French]] [[polymath]] who later won the [[Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel|Nobel Prize in Economics]].<ref name="21st CST 2010"> |
||
{{cite magazine |
|||
|last=Hecht |first=Laurence |
|last=Hecht |first=Laurence |
||
|date=24 October 2010 |
|date=24 October 2010 |
||
Line 10: | Line 13: | ||
|pages=26–30 |
|pages=26–30 |
||
|url=http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles_2010/Fall_2010/New_Physical_Field_Maurice_Allais.pdf |
|url=http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles_2010/Fall_2010/New_Physical_Field_Maurice_Allais.pdf |
||
}}</ref> Allais reported another observation of the effect during the [[solar eclipse of October 2, 1959]] using the [[paraconical pendulum]] he invented.<ref name="Allais 1959 A"> |
|||
{{cite journal |
|||
|last1 = Allais |
|last1 = Allais |
||
|first1 = M. |
|first1 = M. |
||
Line 18: | Line 22: | ||
|pages = 46–52 |
|pages = 46–52 |
||
|url = http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/allais/lawgravit/lawgrav-one.pdf |
|url = http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/allais/lawgravit/lawgrav-one.pdf |
||
| |
|url-status = dead |
||
| |
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150720003631/http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/allais/lawgravit/lawgrav-one.pdf |
||
| |
|archive-date = 2015-07-20 |
||
⚫ | |||
|df = |
|||
{{cite journal |
|||
|last1 = Allais |
|last1 = Allais |
||
|first1 = M. |
|first1 = M. |
||
Line 30: | Line 34: | ||
|pages = 51–55 |
|pages = 51–55 |
||
|url = http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/allais/lawgravit/lawgrav-two.pdf |
|url = http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/allais/lawgravit/lawgrav-two.pdf |
||
| |
|url-status = dead |
||
| |
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160622213903/http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/allais/lawgravit/lawgrav-two.pdf |
||
| |
|archive-date = 2016-06-22 |
||
|df = |
|||
}}</ref> This study earned him the 1959 Galabert Prize of the [[Association Aéronautique et Astronautique de France|French Astronautical Society]] and made him a laureate of the U.S. [[Gravity Research Foundation]] for his 1959 memoir on [[gravity]].<ref name="Allais 1959 memoir">{{cite report|last1=Allais|first1=Maurice|title=New theoretical and experimental research work on gravity|work=Memoir|date=1959}}</ref> The veracity of the Allais effect remains controversial among the scientific community, as its testing has frequently met with inconsistent or ambiguous results over more than five decades of observation. |
}}</ref> This study earned him the 1959 Galabert Prize of the [[Association Aéronautique et Astronautique de France|French Astronautical Society]] and made him a laureate of the U.S. [[Gravity Research Foundation]] for his 1959 memoir on [[gravity]].<ref name="Allais 1959 memoir">{{cite report|last1=Allais|first1=Maurice|title=New theoretical and experimental research work on gravity|work=Memoir|date=1959}}</ref> The veracity of the Allais effect remains controversial among the scientific community, as its testing has frequently met with inconsistent or ambiguous results over more than five decades of observation. |
||
==Experimental observations== |
== Experimental observations == |
||
Maurice Allais emphasized the "dynamic character" of the effects he observed:<ref name="Allais NASA">{{cite report |
Maurice Allais emphasized the "dynamic character" of the effects he observed:<ref name="Allais NASA"> |
||
{{cite report |
|||
|last1=Allais |first1=Maurice |
|last1=Allais |first1=Maurice |
||
|title=The 'Allais Effect' and my experiments with the paraconical pendulum (1954-1960) |
|title=The 'Allais Effect' and my experiments with the paraconical pendulum (1954-1960) |
||
|date=November 1999 |
|date=November 1999 |
||
|work=Memoir C-6083 prepared for NASA |
|work=Memoir C-6083 prepared for NASA |
||
|url=http://www.allais. |
|url=http://www.allais.wiki/alltrans/nasareport.pdf |
||
|format=PDF |
|||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
{{cquote |
{{cquote |
||
Line 50: | Line 53: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
Besides Allais' own experiments, related research about a possible effect of [[the Moon]]'s shielding, absorption or bending of the [[Sun]]'s [[gravitational field]] during a solar eclipse have been conducted by scientists around the world. Some observations have yielded positive results, seemingly confirming that minute but detectable variations in the expected behavior of devices dependent on gravity do indeed occur within the [[umbra]] of an eclipse, but others have failed to detect any noticeable effect. |
Besides Allais's own experiments, related research about a possible effect of [[the Moon]]'s shielding, absorption or bending of the [[Sun]]'s [[gravitational field]] during a solar eclipse have been conducted by scientists around the world. Some observations have yielded positive results, seemingly confirming that minute but detectable variations in the expected behavior of devices dependent on gravity do indeed occur within the [[umbra]] of an eclipse, but others have failed to detect any noticeable effect. |
||
===Anomalous results=== |
=== Anomalous results === |
||
Romanian physicist Gheorghe Jeverdan ''et al.'' observed the Allais effect and the so-called ''Jeverdan-Rusu-Antonescu effect'' or ''Jeverdan effect'' (i.e. the change in the oscillation period of a pendulum during an eclipse) while monitoring a Foucault pendulum during the [[solar eclipse of February 15, 1961]]. The authors made two hypotheses regarding their observation: during an eclipse, the Moon exerts a screening effect on the [[gravity|gravitational attraction]] of the Sun so that the attraction of the Earth is indirectly increased, a phenomenon that could also be studied with [[tide]]s. If the hypothesis of the screening effect is wrong, another explanation could be that the variation of the [[gravity of Earth|Earth's gravity]] might be considered as a result of the [[diffraction]] of [[gravitational wave]]s.<ref name="Jeverdan 1961">{{cite journal|last1=Jeverdan|first1=G. T.|last2=Rusu|first2=G. I.|last3=Antonescu|first3=V. I.|title=Date preliminare asupra comportarii unui pendul Foucault in timpul eclipsei de soare de la 15 februarie 1961|language= |
Romanian physicist Gheorghe Jeverdan ''et al.'' observed the Allais effect and the so-called ''Jeverdan-Rusu-Antonescu effect'' or ''Jeverdan effect'' (i.e. the change in the oscillation period of a pendulum during an eclipse) while monitoring a Foucault pendulum during the [[solar eclipse of February 15, 1961]]. The authors made two hypotheses regarding their observation: during an eclipse, the Moon exerts a screening effect on the [[gravity|gravitational attraction]] of the Sun so that the attraction of the Earth is indirectly increased, a phenomenon that could also be studied with [[tide]]s. If the hypothesis of the screening effect is wrong, another explanation could be that the variation of the [[gravity of Earth|Earth's gravity]] might be considered as a result of the [[diffraction]] of [[gravitational wave]]s.<ref name="Jeverdan 1961">{{cite journal|last1=Jeverdan|first1=G. T.|last2=Rusu|first2=G. I.|last3=Antonescu|first3=V. I.|title=Date preliminare asupra comportarii unui pendul Foucault in timpul eclipsei de soare de la 15 februarie 1961|language=ro|trans-title=Preliminary data about the behavior of a Foucault pendulum during the Sun eclipse of 15 February 15, 1961|date=15 February 1961|journal=Annals of the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University|volume=7|issue=2|page=457}}</ref><ref name="Jeverdan 1981">{{cite journal|last1=Jeverdan|first1=G. T.|last2=Rusu|first2=G. I.|last3=Antonescu|first3=V. I.|title=Experiments using the Foucault pendulum during the solar eclipse of 15 February, 1961|date=1981|journal=The Biblical Astronomer|volume=1|issue=55|pages=18–20|url=http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/jeverdan/bibast.pdf|access-date=2017-03-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080827181954/http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/jeverdan/bibast.pdf|archive-date=2008-08-27|url-status=dead}}</ref> [[Erwin Saxl]] and [[Mildred Allen (physicist)|Mildred Allen]] similarly reported strong anomalous changes in the period of a [[Torsion spring#Torsion balance|torsion pendulum]] during the [[solar eclipse of March 7, 1970]] and concluded that "gravitational theory needs to be modified".<ref name="Saxl-Allen 1971">{{cite journal|last1=Saxl|first1=Erwin J.|last2=Allen|first2=Mildred|title=1970 Solar Eclipse as 'Seen' by a Torsion Pendulum|date=15 February 1971|journal=Physical Review D|volume=3|issue=4|pages=823–825|url=http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/saxlallen/eclipse/saphysrev.pdf|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.3.823|bibcode=1971PhRvD...3..823S|access-date=2017-03-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170519081116/http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/saxlallen/eclipse/saphysrev.pdf|archive-date=2017-05-19|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
Dr. Leonid Savrov of the [[Sternberg Astronomical Institute]] built a dedicated paraconical pendulum to test the Allais effect during the [[solar eclipse of July 11, 1991]] in Mexico and the [[Solar eclipse of November 3, 1994|eclipse of November 3, 1994]] in Brazil. While he could not observe Allais' claim that there is a diurnal periodicity in the motion of a paraconical pendulum, he did, however, write: "The most interesting result of the Mexico and Brazil experiments is the increase of rotational velocity of the pendulum oscillation plane in the direction of the Foucault effect during the eclipse. It seems that we have some kind of special effect."<ref name="Savrov 1995 A">{{cite journal|last1=Savrov|first1=L. A.|last2=Yushkin|first2=V. D.|title=Paraconical pendulum as a detector of gravitational effects during solar eclipses (processing data and results)|date=January 1995|journal=Measurement Techniques|publisher=Springer Science+Business Media|volume=38|issue=1|pages=9–13|url=http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/savrov/Savrov-1.pdf|doi=10.1007/BF00976738|access-date=2017-03-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170329050956/http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/savrov/Savrov-1.pdf|archive-date=2017-03-29| |
Dr. Leonid Savrov of the [[Sternberg Astronomical Institute]] built a dedicated paraconical pendulum to test the Allais effect during the [[solar eclipse of July 11, 1991]] in Mexico and the [[Solar eclipse of November 3, 1994|eclipse of November 3, 1994]] in Brazil. While he could not observe Allais's claim that there is a diurnal periodicity in the motion of a paraconical pendulum, he did, however, write: "The most interesting result of the Mexico and Brazil experiments is the increase of rotational velocity of the pendulum oscillation plane in the direction of the Foucault effect during the eclipse. It seems that we have some kind of special effect."<ref name="Savrov 1995 A">{{cite journal|last1=Savrov|first1=L. A.|last2=Yushkin|first2=V. D.|title=Paraconical pendulum as a detector of gravitational effects during solar eclipses (processing data and results)|date=January 1995|journal=Measurement Techniques|publisher=Springer Science+Business Media|volume=38|issue=1|pages=9–13|url=http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/savrov/Savrov-1.pdf|doi=10.1007/BF00976738|access-date=2017-03-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170329050956/http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/savrov/Savrov-1.pdf|archive-date=2017-03-29|url-status=dead|bibcode=1995MeasT..38..253S|s2cid=120963357}}</ref><ref name="Savrov 1995 B">{{cite journal|last1=Savrov|first1=L. A.|title=Paraconical pendulum as a detector of gravitational effects during solar eclipses (processing data and results)|date=March 1995|journal=Measurement Techniques|publisher=Springer Science+Business Media|volume=38|issue=3|pages=253–260|url=http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/savrov/Savrov-2.pdf|doi=10.1007/BF00977602|access-date=2017-03-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170329050636/http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/savrov/Savrov-2.pdf|archive-date=2017-03-29|url-status=dead|bibcode=1995MeasT..38..253S|s2cid=122031984}}</ref><ref name="Savrov 2009">{{cite journal|last1=Savrov|first1=L. A.|title=Improved determination of variation of rate of rotation of oscillation plane of a paraconic pendulum during the solar eclipse in Mexico on July 11, 1991|date=April 2009|journal=Measurement Techniques|publisher=Springer Science+Business Media|volume=52|issue=4|pages=339–343|doi=10.1007/s11018-009-9291-6|bibcode=2009MeasT..52..339S |s2cid=122985875}}</ref><ref name="Savrov 1997">{{cite journal|last1=Savrov|first1=L. A.|title=Experiment with paraconic pendulums during the November 3, 1994 solar eclipse in Brazil|date=June 1997|journal=Measurement Techniques|publisher=Springer Science+Business Media|volume=40|issue=6|pages=511–516|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239380376|doi=10.1007/BF02504372|bibcode=1997MeasT..40..511S|s2cid=120976498}}</ref> |
||
Various other experiments using [[atomic clock]]s and [[gravimeter]]s instead of pendulums also recorded significant anomalous gravitational effects which can neither be caused by a tidal effect or drift of the gravimeters, nor by high-frequency noise which has special patterns. These experiments were set up by different teams during solar eclipses in [[Solar eclipse of December 24, 1992|China in 1992]],<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Zhou | first1 = S. W. | last2 = Huang | first2 = B. J. | last3 = Ren | first3 = Z. M. | year = 1995 | title = The abnormal influence of the partial solar eclipse on December 24th, 1992, on the time comparisons between atomic clocks |
Various other experiments using [[atomic clock]]s and [[gravimeter]]s instead of pendulums also recorded significant anomalous gravitational effects which can neither be caused by a tidal effect or drift of the gravimeters, nor by high-frequency noise which has special patterns. These experiments were set up by different teams during solar eclipses in [[Solar eclipse of December 24, 1992|China in 1992]],<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Zhou | first1 = S. W. | last2 = Huang | first2 = B. J. | last3 = Ren | first3 = Z. M. | year = 1995 | title = The abnormal influence of the partial solar eclipse on December 24th, 1992, on the time comparisons between atomic clocks | journal = Il Nuovo Cimento C | volume = 18 | issue = 2| pages = 223–236 |bibcode = 1995NCimC..18..223Z |doi = 10.1007/BF02512022 | s2cid = 123012966 }}</ref> [[Solar eclipse of October 24, 1995|India in 1995]],<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Mishra | first1 = D. C. | last2 = Rao | first2 = M. B. S. Vyaghreswara | year = 1997 | title = Temporal variation in gravity field during solar eclipse on 24 October 1995 | journal = Current Science | volume = 72 | issue = 11| pages = 782–783 }}</ref> and [[Solar eclipse of March 9, 1997|China in 1997]].<ref name="Yang 2000">{{cite journal|last1=Wang|first1=Q.S.|last2=Yang|first2=X.S.|last3=Wu|first3=C.Z.|last4=Guo|first4=G.H.|last5=Liu|first5=H.C.|last6=Hua|first6=C.C.|title=Precise measurement of gravity variations during a total solar eclipse|date=14 July 2000|journal=Physical Review D|volume=62|issue=4|page=041101|url=http://www.eclipse2006.boun.edu.tr/sss/paper03.pdf|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.62.041101|arxiv = 1003.4947|bibcode = 2000PhRvD..62d1101W|s2cid=6846335}}</ref> |
||
⚫ | Results reporting the observation of the Allais and Jeverdan-Rusu-Antonescu effects during the [[Solar eclipse#Types|annular solar eclipse]] of [[Solar eclipse of September 22, 2006|September 22, 2006]] were presented the following year by a Romanian team, with a quantization of the behavior of the paraconical pendulum.<ref name="Popescu 2007"> |
||
Dutch physicist Chris Duif, who surveys the field of gravitational anomalies in general, concludes that the question remains open because Allais observations do not satisfy conventional explanations, and that such investigations should be pursued, in view of their relatively inexpensive nature and the enormous implications if genuine anomalies are actually confirmed, but the article was self-published and has not undergone any [[peer review]].<ref name="Duif 2004">{{cite arXiv|last1=Duif|first1=Chris P.|title=A review of conventional explanations of anomalous observations during solar eclipses|date=9 August 2004|eprint=gr-qc/0408023}}</ref> |
|||
{{cite conference |
|||
⚫ | Results |
||
|last1=Popescu |first1=V. A. |
|last1=Popescu |first1=V. A. |
||
|last2=Olenici |first2=D. |
|last2=Olenici |first2=D. |
||
Line 71: | Line 73: | ||
|publisher=Society for Scientific Exploration |
|publisher=Society for Scientific Exploration |
||
|url=http://www.hessdalen.org/sse/program/Articol.pdf |
|url=http://www.hessdalen.org/sse/program/Articol.pdf |
||
}}</ref> During the [[solar eclipse of August 1, 2008]], a Ukrainian team and two Romanian teams worked together hundreds of kilometers apart with different apparatuses: five independent miniature torsion balances for the Ukrainian team, two independent short ball-borne pendulums for a Romanian team and a long Foucault pendulum for the third team. All three teams detected unexplained and mutually correlated disturbances.<ref name="Pugach-Olenici 2010"> |
|||
{{cite journal |
|||
|last1 = Goodey |
|last1 = Goodey |
||
|first1 = T. J. |
|first1 = T. J. |
||
Line 87: | Line 90: | ||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170329053756/http://stoner.phys.uaic.ro/jarp/index.php/jarp/article/view/40/22/ |
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170329053756/http://stoner.phys.uaic.ro/jarp/index.php/jarp/article/view/40/22/ |
||
|archive-date = 2017-03-29 |
|archive-date = 2017-03-29 |
||
| |
|url-status = dead |
||
⚫ | |||
|df = |
|||
{{cite journal |
|||
⚫ | |||
|last1=Pugach |first1=A. F. |
|last1=Pugach |first1=A. F. |
||
|last2=Olenici |first2=D. |
|last2=Olenici |first2=D. |
||
Line 99: | Line 102: | ||
|url=http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/aa/2012/263818.pdf |
|url=http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/aa/2012/263818.pdf |
||
|doi=10.1155/2012/263818 |
|doi=10.1155/2012/263818 |
||
|bibcode = 2012AdAst2012E...2P }}</ref> They also registered similar anomalies using a Foucault pendulum and a very light torsion balance, both located underground in a disused salt mine with minimal interference, during the partial [[solar eclipse of June 1, 2011]]. |
|bibcode = 2012AdAst2012E...2P |doi-access=free |
||
}}</ref> They also registered similar anomalies using a Foucault pendulum and a very light torsion balance, both located underground in a disused salt mine with minimal interference, during the partial [[solar eclipse of June 1, 2011]]. |
|||
===Inconclusive or negative results=== |
=== Inconclusive or negative results === |
||
[[Louis B. Slichter]], using a gravimeter during the [[solar eclipse of February 15, 1961]] in [[Florence]], [[Italy]], failed to detect an associated gravitational signal.<ref name="Slichter 1961">{{cite journal |
[[Louis B. Slichter]], using a gravimeter during the [[solar eclipse of February 15, 1961]] in [[Florence]], [[Italy]], failed to detect an associated gravitational signal.<ref name="Slichter 1961"> |
||
{{cite journal |
|||
|last1=Slichter |first1=L. B. |
|last1=Slichter |first1=L. B. |
||
|last2=Caputo |first2=M. |
|last2=Caputo |first2=M. |
||
Line 109: | Line 114: | ||
|title=An experiment concerning gravitational shielding |
|title=An experiment concerning gravitational shielding |
||
|date=15 March 1965 |
|date=15 March 1965 |
||
|journal=Journal of |
|journal= Journal of Geophysical Research |
||
|volume=70 |
|volume=70 |
||
|issue=6 |
|issue=6 |
||
Line 117: | Line 122: | ||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
During the [[solar eclipse of July 22, 1990]], no anomalous period increase of a torsion pendulum was detected independently by a team in [[Finland]]<ref name="Kuusela 1991">{{cite journal |
During the [[solar eclipse of July 22, 1990]], no anomalous period increase of a torsion pendulum was detected independently by a team in [[Finland]]<ref name="Kuusela 1991"> |
||
{{cite journal |
|||
|last1=Kuusela |first1=T. |
|last1=Kuusela |first1=T. |
||
|title=Effect of the solar eclipse on the period of a torsion pendulum |
|title=Effect of the solar eclipse on the period of a torsion pendulum |
||
Line 127: | Line 133: | ||
|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/13275053 |
|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/13275053 |
||
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.43.2041 |
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.43.2041 |
||
|pmid=10013582 |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
{{cite journal |
|||
|last1=Jun |first1=Luo |
|last1=Jun |first1=Luo |
||
|last2=Jianguo |first2=Li |
|last2=Jianguo |first2=Li |
||
Line 141: | Line 150: | ||
|pages=2611–2613 |
|pages=2611–2613 |
||
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.44.2611 |
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.44.2611 |
||
|pmid=10014147 |
|||
⚫ | |||
|bibcode = 1991PhRvD..44.2611L |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
The total [[solar eclipse of August 11, 1999]] had been a good opportunity to solve a 45-year mystery, thanks to an international collaboration. [[NASA]]'s [[Marshall Space Flight Center]] first inquired about experimental protocols to Maurice Allais,<ref name="Allais NASA" /> in order to coordinate ahead of the event a worldwide effort to test the Allais effect between observatories and universities over seven countries ([[US|United States]], [[Austria]], [[Germany]], [[Italy]], [[Australia]], [[England]] and four sites in the [[United Arab Emirates]]). The lead supervisor then stated: "The initial interpretation of the record points to three possibilities: a systematic error, a local effect, or the unexplored. To eliminate the first two possibilities, we and several other observers will use different kinds of measuring instruments in a distributed global network of observing stations."<ref name="NASA 1999 A">{{cite web |
The total [[solar eclipse of August 11, 1999]] had been a good opportunity to solve a 45-year mystery, thanks to an international collaboration. [[NASA]]'s [[Marshall Space Flight Center]] first inquired about experimental protocols to Maurice Allais,<ref name="Allais NASA" /> in order to coordinate ahead of the event a worldwide effort to test the Allais effect between observatories and universities over seven countries ([[US|United States]], [[Austria]], [[Germany]], [[Italy]], [[Australia]], [[England]] and four sites in the [[United Arab Emirates]]). The lead supervisor then stated: "The initial interpretation of the record points to three possibilities: a systematic error, a local effect, or the unexplored. To eliminate the first two possibilities, we and several other observers will use different kinds of measuring instruments in a distributed global network of observing stations."<ref name="NASA 1999 A"> |
||
{{cite web |
|||
|author = Leslie Mullen |
|author = Leslie Mullen |
||
|title = Decrypting the Eclipse |
|title = Decrypting the Eclipse |
||
Line 149: | Line 161: | ||
|website = Archived copy of NASA web page |
|website = Archived copy of NASA web page |
||
|url = http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/noever/decrypting.htm |
|url = http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/noever/decrypting.htm |
||
| |
|url-status = dead |
||
| |
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080516091554/http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/noever/decrypting.htm |
||
| |
|archive-date = 2008-05-16 |
||
}}</ref><ref name="NASA 1999 B"> |
|||
|df = |
|||
{{cite web |
|||
|author=Dave Dooling |
|author=Dave Dooling |
||
|title=French Nobel Laureate turns back clock |
|title=French Nobel Laureate turns back clock |
||
Line 159: | Line 171: | ||
|website=NASA |
|website=NASA |
||
|url=https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1999/ast12oct99_1 |
|url=https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1999/ast12oct99_1 |
||
}}</ref> However, after the eclipse, Allais criticized the experiments in his final NASA report, writing the period of observation was "much too short […] to detect anomalies properly".<ref name="Allais NASA" /> Moreover, the lead supervisor left NASA shortly thereafter with the gathered data and the NASA study has never been published.<ref>{{cite web |
}}</ref> However, after the eclipse, Allais criticized the experiments in his final NASA report, writing the period of observation was "much too short […] to detect anomalies properly".<ref name="Allais NASA" /> Moreover, the lead supervisor left NASA shortly thereafter with the gathered data and the NASA study has never been published.<ref> |
||
{{cite web |
|||
|author=Thomas Goodey |
|author=Thomas Goodey |
||
|title=Information available about what happened in the NASA 1999 Eclipse Experiments |
|title=Information available about what happened in the NASA 1999 Eclipse Experiments |
||
|date=2000 |
|date=2000 |
||
|website=allais. |
|website=allais.wiki |
||
|url=http://www.allais. |
|url=http://www.allais.wiki/priorartdocs/noever.htm |
||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
Further observations conducted by the team led by [[Xin-She Yang]] appear to have yielded much weaker evidence of anomalies than their first 1997 study. The authors first posited a more conventional explanation based on temperature changes causing ground tilting, but later suggested that this explanation was unlikely.<ref name="Yang 2002">{{cite journal |
Further observations conducted by the team led by [[Xin-She Yang]] appear to have yielded much weaker evidence of anomalies than their first 1997 study. The authors first posited a more conventional explanation based on temperature changes causing ground tilting, but later suggested that this explanation was unlikely.<ref name="Yang 2002"> |
||
{{cite journal |
|||
|last1 = Yang |
|last1 = Yang |
||
|first1 = Xin-She |
|first1 = Xin-She |
||
Line 181: | Line 195: | ||
|doi = 10.1023/A:1021119023985 |
|doi = 10.1023/A:1021119023985 |
||
|bibcode = 2002Ap&SS.282..245Y |
|bibcode = 2002Ap&SS.282..245Y |
||
|s2cid = 118497439 |
|||
|access-date = 2017-03-27 |
|access-date = 2017-03-27 |
||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120112110237/http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/wang/yangwang.pdf |
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120112110237/http://home.t01.itscom.net/allais/blackprior/wang/yangwang.pdf |
||
|archive-date = 2012-01-12 |
|archive-date = 2012-01-12 |
||
| |
|url-status = dead |
||
|df = |
|||
}}</ref> A possible yet controversial explanation was finally proposed by the same author and [[Tom Van Flandern]] which conjectured that the anomaly is due to the gravitational effect of an increased air density spot in the upper atmosphere created by cooling winds during the solar eclipse. They conclude there have been "no unambiguous detections <nowiki>[of an Allais effect]</nowiki> within the past 30 years when consciousness of the importance of <nowiki>[experimental]</nowiki> controls was more widespread." They point out that "the gravitation anomaly discussed here is about a factor of 100,000 too small to explain the Allais excess pendulum precession […] during eclipses" and from this conclude that the original Allais anomaly was merely due to poor controls.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Van Flandern|first1=T.|last2=Yang|first2=X. S.|title=Allais gravity and pendulum effects during solar eclipses explained|journal=Physical Review D|date=15 January 2003|volume=67|issue=2|page=022002|url=http://www.faidherbe.org/~foucault/fichiers/pdf/theorie_allais_articles_Flandern_Yang.pdf|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.67.022002|bibcode = 2003PhRvD..67b2002V}}</ref> |
}}</ref> A possible yet controversial explanation was finally proposed by the same author and [[Tom Van Flandern]] which conjectured that the anomaly is due to the gravitational effect of an increased air density spot in the upper atmosphere created by cooling winds during the solar eclipse. They conclude there have been "no unambiguous detections <nowiki>[of an Allais effect]</nowiki> within the past 30 years when consciousness of the importance of <nowiki>[experimental]</nowiki> controls was more widespread." They point out that "the gravitation anomaly discussed here is about a factor of 100,000 too small to explain the Allais excess pendulum precession […] during eclipses" and from this conclude that the original Allais anomaly was merely due to poor controls.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Van Flandern|first1=T.|last2=Yang|first2=X. S.|title=Allais gravity and pendulum effects during solar eclipses explained|journal=Physical Review D|date=15 January 2003|volume=67|issue=2|page=022002|url=http://www.faidherbe.org/~foucault/fichiers/pdf/theorie_allais_articles_Flandern_Yang.pdf|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.67.022002|bibcode = 2003PhRvD..67b2002V}}</ref> |
||
Eight gravimeters and two pendulums were deployed across six monitoring sites in China for the [[solar eclipse of July 22, 2009]].<ref name="NewScientist 2009">{{cite web |
Eight gravimeters and two pendulums were deployed across six monitoring sites in China for the [[solar eclipse of July 22, 2009]].<ref name="NewScientist 2009"> |
||
{{cite web |
|||
|author=Phil McKenna |
|author=Phil McKenna |
||
|title=July eclipse is best chance to look for gravity anomaly |
|title=July eclipse is best chance to look for gravity anomaly |
||
Line 194: | Line 209: | ||
|website=NewScientist |
|website=NewScientist |
||
|url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17481-july-eclipse-is-best-chance-to-look-for-gravity-anomaly.html |
|url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17481-july-eclipse-is-best-chance-to-look-for-gravity-anomaly.html |
||
}}</ref> Although one of the scientists involved described in an interview having observed the Allais effect,<ref name="The Atlantic 2009">{{cite web |
}}</ref> Although one of the scientists involved described in an interview having observed the Allais effect,<ref name="The Atlantic 2009"> |
||
{{cite web |
|||
|author= |
|||
|title=Eclipse at Sheshan Hill |
|title=Eclipse at Sheshan Hill |
||
|date=July 2009 |
|date=July 2009 |
||
|website=The Atlantic |
|website=The Atlantic |
||
|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/07/eclipse-at-sheshan-hill/7599/ |
|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/07/eclipse-at-sheshan-hill/7599/ |
||
}}</ref> no result has been published in any [[academic journal]]. An automated Foucault pendulum was also used during the [[solar eclipse of July 11, 2010]] in Argentina, with no evidence of a precession change of the pendulum's oscillation plane (< 0.3 degree per hour).<ref name="Salva 2011">{{cite journal |
}}</ref> no result has been published in any [[academic journal]]. An automated Foucault pendulum was also used during the [[solar eclipse of July 11, 2010]] in Argentina, with no evidence of a precession change of the pendulum's oscillation plane (< 0.3 degree per hour).<ref name="Salva 2011"> |
||
{{cite journal |
|||
|last1=Salva |first1=Horacio R. |
|last1=Salva |first1=Horacio R. |
||
|title=Searching the Allais effect during the total sun eclipse of 11 July 2010 |
|title=Searching the Allais effect during the total sun eclipse of 11 July 2010 |
||
Line 209: | Line 225: | ||
|pages=067302 |
|pages=067302 |
||
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.83.067302 |
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.83.067302 |
||
|bibcode = 2011PhRvD..83f7302S |url=https://zenodo.org/record/897931 |
|bibcode = 2011PhRvD..83f7302S |url=https://zenodo.org/record/897931 |
||
}}</ref> |
|||
==Aether hypothesis== |
== Aether hypothesis == |
||
{{main|Luminiferous aether|Aether drag hypothesis}} |
{{main|Luminiferous aether|Aether drag hypothesis}} |
||
Maurice Allais states that the eclipse effect is related to a gravitational anomaly that is inexplicable in the framework of the currently admitted [[Gravity|theory of gravitation]], without giving any explanation of his own.<ref name="Allais' book 1997" /> Allais' explanation for another anomaly (the [[Lunisolar calendar|lunisolar]] periodicity in variations of the [[azimuth]] of a pendulum) is that space evinces certain [[Anisotropy|anisotropic]] characteristics, which he ascribes to motion through an [[luminiferous aether|aether]] which is partially entrained by planetary bodies. |
Maurice Allais states that the eclipse effect is related to a gravitational anomaly that is inexplicable in the framework of the currently admitted [[Gravity|theory of gravitation]], without giving any explanation of his own.<ref name="Allais' book 1997" /> Allais's explanation for another anomaly (the [[Lunisolar calendar|lunisolar]] periodicity in variations of the [[azimuth]] of a pendulum) is that space evinces certain [[Anisotropy|anisotropic]] characteristics, which he ascribes to motion through an [[luminiferous aether|aether]] which is partially entrained by planetary bodies. |
||
His hypothesis leads to a [[speed of light]] dependent on the moving direction with respect to a terrestrial observer, since the Earth moves within the aether but the rotation of the Moon induces a "wind" of about 8 km/s. Thus Allais rejects [[Albert Einstein|Einstein]]'s interpretation of the [[Michelson–Morley experiment]] and the subsequent verification experiments of [[Dayton Miller]].<ref name="Miller"> |
His hypothesis leads to a [[speed of light]] dependent on the moving direction with respect to a terrestrial observer, since the Earth moves within the aether but the rotation of the Moon induces a "wind" of about 8 km/s. Thus Allais rejects [[Albert Einstein|Einstein]]'s interpretation of the [[Michelson–Morley experiment]] and the subsequent verification experiments of [[Dayton Miller]].<ref name="Miller"> |
||
Line 229: | Line 245: | ||
|doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.5.203 |
|doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.5.203 |
||
|bibcode=1933RvMP....5..203M |
|bibcode=1933RvMP....5..203M |
||
|s2cid=4119615 |
|||
⚫ | |||
}}</ref><ref name="Allais 1998"> |
|||
{{cite magazine |
|||
|last=Allais |first=Maurice |
|last=Allais |first=Maurice |
||
|date=1998 |
|date=1998 |
||
Line 236: | Line 254: | ||
|pages=26–32 |
|pages=26–32 |
||
|url=http://ayuba.fr/images/emdrive/allais_effect/allais_1998.pdf |
|url=http://ayuba.fr/images/emdrive/allais_effect/allais_1998.pdf |
||
}}</ref> |
|||
In particular, the Michelson–Morley experiment did not give a zero speed difference, but at most 8 km/s, without being able to detect any regularity. This difference was therefore interpreted as due to measurement uncertainties. Similarly, Miller's experiments corroborated these results over a long period of time, but Miller could not explain the source of the irregularities. At the time, temperature problems were invoked to explain the cause, as concluded by [[Robert S. Shankland]].<ref name="Shankland">{{cite journal |
In particular, the Michelson–Morley experiment did not give a zero speed difference, but at most 8 km/s, without being able to detect any regularity. This difference was therefore interpreted as due to measurement uncertainties. Similarly, Miller's experiments corroborated these results over a long period of time, but Miller could not explain the source of the irregularities. At the time, temperature problems were invoked to explain the cause, as concluded by [[Robert S. Shankland]].<ref name="Shankland"> |
||
{{cite journal |
|||
|last1=Shankland |first1=R. S. |
|last1=Shankland |first1=R. S. |
||
|last2=McCuskey |first2=S. W.. |
|last2=McCuskey |first2=S. W.. |
||
Line 250: | Line 269: | ||
|pages=167–178 |
|pages=167–178 |
||
|doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.27.167 |bibcode=1955RvMP...27..167S |
|doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.27.167 |bibcode=1955RvMP...27..167S |
||
}}</ref> By re-analyzing the data from this experiment, Allais reported a [[Periodic function|periodicity]] using [[sidereal time]] rather than [[civil time]] used by Miller (daytime sidereal variation of the speed of light over a period of 23 hours 56 minutes with an amplitude of about 8 km/s).<ref name="Miller reanalyzed">{{cite web |
}}</ref> By re-analyzing the data from this experiment, Allais reported a [[Periodic function|periodicity]] using [[sidereal time]] rather than [[civil time]] used by Miller (daytime sidereal variation of the speed of light over a period of 23 hours 56 minutes with an amplitude of about 8 km/s).<ref name="Miller reanalyzed"> |
||
{{cite web |
|||
|last1=Deloly |first1=Jean-Bernard |
|last1=Deloly |first1=Jean-Bernard |
||
|title=The re-examination of Miller's interferometric observations and of Esclangon's observations |
|title=The re-examination of Miller's interferometric observations and of Esclangon's observations |
||
|website=Maurice Allais Foundation |
|website=Maurice Allais Foundation |
||
|language= |
|language=en |
||
|url=http://www.fondationmauriceallais.org/the-physicist/the-re-examination-of-millers-interferometric-observations-and-of-esclangons-observations/?lang=en |
|url=http://www.fondationmauriceallais.org/the-physicist/the-re-examination-of-millers-interferometric-observations-and-of-esclangons-observations/?lang=en |
||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
Applying the [[Titius–Bode law]] to the Earth–Moon system, which he generalizes to aether, Allais calculates a "wind" of 7.95 km/s, which is comparable to the values found by the experiments of Michelson and Miller. Hence Allais deduces that the aether turns with the stars, as proposed by the [[aether drag hypothesis]], and is not fixed as [[Hendrik Lorentz]] thought when inventing his famous [[Lorentz transformation|transformation]] and his [[Lorentz ether theory|ether theory]]. But the majority of scientists at the end of the 19th century imagined that such an aether crossed the Earth so that the rotation of the Earth around the Sun would cause an important variation of 30 km/s. Consequently, since the third postulate on which [[special relativity]] is based is the constancy of the speed of light in |
Applying the [[Titius–Bode law]] to the Earth–Moon system, which he generalizes to aether, Allais calculates a "wind" of 7.95 km/s, which is comparable to the values found by the experiments of Michelson and Miller. Hence Allais deduces that the aether turns with the stars, as proposed by the [[aether drag hypothesis]], and is not fixed as [[Hendrik Lorentz]] thought when inventing his famous [[Lorentz transformation|transformation]] and his [[Lorentz ether theory|ether theory]]. But the majority of scientists at the end of the 19th century imagined that such an aether crossed the Earth so that the rotation of the Earth around the Sun would cause an important variation of 30 km/s. Consequently, since the third postulate on which [[special relativity]] is based is the constancy of the speed of light in vacuum, Allais considers it unfounded. In order to measure a change in the speed of light, one would have to get back to the definition of the [[History of the metre#Krypton standard|1960 meter]], since confidence in the [[theory of relativity]] nowadays is such that current [[metrology]] uses constancy of the speed of light as an [[axiom]]. |
||
Allais summarized his experimental work in English in his 1999 memoir on behalf of NASA.<ref name="Allais NASA" /> He detailed his aether hypothesis in the books ''L'Anisotropie de l'Espace'', published in 1997,<ref name="Allais' book 1997">{{ |
Allais summarized his experimental work in English in his 1999 memoir on behalf of NASA.<ref name="Allais NASA" /> He detailed his aether hypothesis in the books ''L'Anisotropie de l'Espace'', published in 1997,<ref name="Allais' book 1997"> |
||
{{cite book |
|||
|last1=Allais |first1=Maurice |
|last1=Allais |first1=Maurice |
||
|date=1997 |
|date=1997 |
||
|title=L'Anisotropie de l'Espace |
|title=L'Anisotropie de l'Espace |
||
|language= |
|language=fr |
||
|trans-title=The Anisotropy of Space |
|trans-title=The Anisotropy of Space |
||
|publisher=Clément Juglar Editions |
|publisher=Clément Juglar Editions |
||
|url=http://ether-wind.narod.ru/Allais_1997/Allais_1997_1.pdf |
|url=http://ether-wind.narod.ru/Allais_1997/Allais_1997_1.pdf |
||
|isbn=978-2908735093 |
|isbn=978-2908735093 |
||
}}</ref> and ''L'Effondrement de la Théorie de la Relativité'', published in 2004.<ref name="Allais' book 2004">{{ |
}}</ref> and ''L'Effondrement de la Théorie de la Relativité'', published in 2004.<ref name="Allais' book 2004"> |
||
{{cite book |
|||
|last1=Allais |first1=Maurice |
|last1=Allais |first1=Maurice |
||
|date=2004 |
|date=2004 |
||
|title=L'Effondrement de la Théorie de la Relativité – Implication irréfragable des données de l'expérience |
|title=L'Effondrement de la Théorie de la Relativité – Implication irréfragable des données de l'expérience |
||
|language= |
|language=fr |
||
|trans-title=The Collapse of the Theory of Relativity – Irrefutable implication of the empirical data |
|trans-title=The Collapse of the Theory of Relativity – Irrefutable implication of the empirical data |
||
|publisher=Clément Juglar Editions |
|publisher=Clément Juglar Editions |
||
|isbn=978-2908735185 |
|isbn=978-2908735185 |
||
}}</ref> A book on Allais' scientific legacy has been edited in English in 2011,<ref name="Book 2011">{{cite book |
}}</ref> A book on Allais's scientific legacy has been edited in English in 2011,<ref name="Book 2011"> |
||
{{cite book |
|||
|author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |
|author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |
||
|editor1-last=Múnera |editor1-first=Héctor A. |
|editor1-last=Múnera |editor1-first=Héctor A. |
||
Line 284: | Line 307: | ||
|publisher=Apeiron |
|publisher=Apeiron |
||
|isbn=978-0986492655 |
|isbn=978-0986492655 |
||
}}</ref> yet his aether hypothesis has not gained significant traction among mainstream scientists. Nevertheless, after Allais' death in 2010, experiments on the Allais effect continue.<ref name="Deloly 2016">{{cite web |
}}</ref> yet his aether hypothesis has not gained significant traction among mainstream scientists. Nevertheless, after Allais's death in 2010, experiments on the Allais effect continue.<ref name="Deloly 2016"> |
||
{{cite web |
|||
|last1=Deloly |first1=Jean-Bernard |
|last1=Deloly |first1=Jean-Bernard |
||
|title=Continuation given to Maurice Allais's experimental works. State of the situation (2015) |
|title=Continuation given to Maurice Allais's experimental works. State of the situation (2015) |
||
Line 290: | Line 314: | ||
|website=Maurice Allais Foundation |
|website=Maurice Allais Foundation |
||
|url=http://www.fondationmauriceallais.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/situation_allais_2015-trad.pdf |
|url=http://www.fondationmauriceallais.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/situation_allais_2015-trad.pdf |
||
}}</ref> |
|||
==See also== |
== See also == |
||
*[[ |
* [[N-rays]] |
||
*[[ |
* [[Pioneer anomaly]] |
||
*[[Aether drag hypothesis]] |
|||
*[[N-rays]] |
|||
*[[Pioneer anomaly]] |
|||
==References== |
== References == |
||
{{reflist|30em}} |
{{reflist|30em}} |
||
==External links== |
== External links == |
||
{{wikiversity}} |
{{wikiversity}} |
||
* [http://www.fondationmauriceallais.org/?lang=en Maurice Allais Foundation] website (English version) |
* [http://www.fondationmauriceallais.org/?lang=en Maurice Allais Foundation] website (English version) |
||
* Maurice Allais, Ten Notes published in the Proceedings of the [[French Academy of Sciences]] (''Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'Académie des Sciences''), dated 4/11/57, 13/11/57, 18/11/57, 13/5/57, 4/12/57, 25/11/57, 3/11/58, 22/12/58, 9/2/59, and 19/1/59, available in French at http://allais. |
* Maurice Allais, Ten Notes published in the Proceedings of the [[French Academy of Sciences]] (''Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'Académie des Sciences''), dated 4/11/57, 13/11/57, 18/11/57, 13/5/57, 4/12/57, 25/11/57, 3/11/58, 22/12/58, 9/2/59, and 19/1/59, available in French at http://allais.wiki/alltrans/allaisnot.htm, some also in English translation. |
||
* Thomas J. Goodey, "[http://www.allais. |
* Thomas J. Goodey, "[http://www.allais.wiki Professor Maurice Allais – a genius before his time – as are they all]" (Web site claiming to be the internet base of researchers studying and publicizing the Allais effect; includes copies/translations of several of the above papers.) |
||
* Ed Oberg "[http://www.iasoberg.com www.iasoberg.com]" This site has been established by Ed Oberg to facilitate and promote research into the Allais Effect and to distribute the resulting findings. The launch of this site (23 November 2007) coincided with the launch of a hypothetical field model developed by Ed Oberg. |
* Ed Oberg "[http://www.iasoberg.com www.iasoberg.com]" This site has been established by Ed Oberg to facilitate and promote research into the Allais Effect and to distribute the resulting findings. The launch of this site (23 November 2007) coincided with the launch of a hypothetical field model developed by Ed Oberg. |
||
* Göde Wissenschafts Stiftung "[http://www.gravitation.org/institute_of_gravity_research/Experiments/experiments.html Experimental measuring results with the paraconical pendulum] |
* Göde Wissenschafts Stiftung "[http://www.gravitation.org/institute_of_gravity_research/Experiments/experiments.html Experimental measuring results with the paraconical pendulum] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061208231427/http://www.gravitation.org/Institute_of_Gravity_Research/Experiments/experiments.html |date=2006-12-08 }} |
||
{{Solar eclipses}} |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Allais Effect}} |
{{DEFAULTSORT:Allais Effect}} |
||
[[Category:Discovery and invention controversies]] |
[[Category:Discovery and invention controversies]] |
||
[[Category:Fringe physics]] |
[[Category:Fringe physics]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Gravimetry]] |
||
[[Category:Solar eclipses]] |
[[Category:Solar eclipses]] |
Latest revision as of 22:22, 28 October 2024
This article needs attention from an expert in Physics. The specific problem is: The nature of the effect is not described.(June 2022) |
The Allais effect is the alleged anomalous behavior of pendulums or gravimeters which is sometimes purportedly observed during a solar eclipse. The effect was first reported as an anomalous precession of the plane of oscillation of a Foucault pendulum during the solar eclipse of June 30, 1954 by Maurice Allais, a French polymath who later won the Nobel Prize in Economics.[1] Allais reported another observation of the effect during the solar eclipse of October 2, 1959 using the paraconical pendulum he invented.[2][3] This study earned him the 1959 Galabert Prize of the French Astronautical Society and made him a laureate of the U.S. Gravity Research Foundation for his 1959 memoir on gravity.[4] The veracity of the Allais effect remains controversial among the scientific community, as its testing has frequently met with inconsistent or ambiguous results over more than five decades of observation.
Experimental observations
[edit]Maurice Allais emphasized the "dynamic character" of the effects he observed:[5]
The observed effects are only seen when the pendulum is moving. They are not connected with the intensity of weight (gravimetry), but with the variation of weight (or of inertia) in the space swept by the pendulum. Actually, while the movement of the plane of oscillation of the pendulum is inexplicable by the theory of gravitation, the deviations from the vertical are explained perfectly by that theory. The deviations from the vertical […] correspond to a static phenomenon, while my experiments correspond to a dynamic phenomenon.
Besides Allais's own experiments, related research about a possible effect of the Moon's shielding, absorption or bending of the Sun's gravitational field during a solar eclipse have been conducted by scientists around the world. Some observations have yielded positive results, seemingly confirming that minute but detectable variations in the expected behavior of devices dependent on gravity do indeed occur within the umbra of an eclipse, but others have failed to detect any noticeable effect.
Anomalous results
[edit]Romanian physicist Gheorghe Jeverdan et al. observed the Allais effect and the so-called Jeverdan-Rusu-Antonescu effect or Jeverdan effect (i.e. the change in the oscillation period of a pendulum during an eclipse) while monitoring a Foucault pendulum during the solar eclipse of February 15, 1961. The authors made two hypotheses regarding their observation: during an eclipse, the Moon exerts a screening effect on the gravitational attraction of the Sun so that the attraction of the Earth is indirectly increased, a phenomenon that could also be studied with tides. If the hypothesis of the screening effect is wrong, another explanation could be that the variation of the Earth's gravity might be considered as a result of the diffraction of gravitational waves.[6][7] Erwin Saxl and Mildred Allen similarly reported strong anomalous changes in the period of a torsion pendulum during the solar eclipse of March 7, 1970 and concluded that "gravitational theory needs to be modified".[8]
Dr. Leonid Savrov of the Sternberg Astronomical Institute built a dedicated paraconical pendulum to test the Allais effect during the solar eclipse of July 11, 1991 in Mexico and the eclipse of November 3, 1994 in Brazil. While he could not observe Allais's claim that there is a diurnal periodicity in the motion of a paraconical pendulum, he did, however, write: "The most interesting result of the Mexico and Brazil experiments is the increase of rotational velocity of the pendulum oscillation plane in the direction of the Foucault effect during the eclipse. It seems that we have some kind of special effect."[9][10][11][12]
Various other experiments using atomic clocks and gravimeters instead of pendulums also recorded significant anomalous gravitational effects which can neither be caused by a tidal effect or drift of the gravimeters, nor by high-frequency noise which has special patterns. These experiments were set up by different teams during solar eclipses in China in 1992,[13] India in 1995,[14] and China in 1997.[15]
Results reporting the observation of the Allais and Jeverdan-Rusu-Antonescu effects during the annular solar eclipse of September 22, 2006 were presented the following year by a Romanian team, with a quantization of the behavior of the paraconical pendulum.[16] During the solar eclipse of August 1, 2008, a Ukrainian team and two Romanian teams worked together hundreds of kilometers apart with different apparatuses: five independent miniature torsion balances for the Ukrainian team, two independent short ball-borne pendulums for a Romanian team and a long Foucault pendulum for the third team. All three teams detected unexplained and mutually correlated disturbances.[17] The same teams repeated a dual experiment during the annular solar eclipse of January 26, 2009, this time outside of the umbra, with the same significant correlation between the behavior of light torsion balances and a Foucault pendulum.[18] They also registered similar anomalies using a Foucault pendulum and a very light torsion balance, both located underground in a disused salt mine with minimal interference, during the partial solar eclipse of June 1, 2011.
Inconclusive or negative results
[edit]Louis B. Slichter, using a gravimeter during the solar eclipse of February 15, 1961 in Florence, Italy, failed to detect an associated gravitational signal.[19]
During the solar eclipse of July 22, 1990, no anomalous period increase of a torsion pendulum was detected independently by a team in Finland[20] and another team in Belomorsk, USSR.[21]
The total solar eclipse of August 11, 1999 had been a good opportunity to solve a 45-year mystery, thanks to an international collaboration. NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center first inquired about experimental protocols to Maurice Allais,[5] in order to coordinate ahead of the event a worldwide effort to test the Allais effect between observatories and universities over seven countries (United States, Austria, Germany, Italy, Australia, England and four sites in the United Arab Emirates). The lead supervisor then stated: "The initial interpretation of the record points to three possibilities: a systematic error, a local effect, or the unexplored. To eliminate the first two possibilities, we and several other observers will use different kinds of measuring instruments in a distributed global network of observing stations."[22][23] However, after the eclipse, Allais criticized the experiments in his final NASA report, writing the period of observation was "much too short […] to detect anomalies properly".[5] Moreover, the lead supervisor left NASA shortly thereafter with the gathered data and the NASA study has never been published.[24]
Further observations conducted by the team led by Xin-She Yang appear to have yielded much weaker evidence of anomalies than their first 1997 study. The authors first posited a more conventional explanation based on temperature changes causing ground tilting, but later suggested that this explanation was unlikely.[25] A possible yet controversial explanation was finally proposed by the same author and Tom Van Flandern which conjectured that the anomaly is due to the gravitational effect of an increased air density spot in the upper atmosphere created by cooling winds during the solar eclipse. They conclude there have been "no unambiguous detections [of an Allais effect] within the past 30 years when consciousness of the importance of [experimental] controls was more widespread." They point out that "the gravitation anomaly discussed here is about a factor of 100,000 too small to explain the Allais excess pendulum precession […] during eclipses" and from this conclude that the original Allais anomaly was merely due to poor controls.[26]
Eight gravimeters and two pendulums were deployed across six monitoring sites in China for the solar eclipse of July 22, 2009.[27] Although one of the scientists involved described in an interview having observed the Allais effect,[28] no result has been published in any academic journal. An automated Foucault pendulum was also used during the solar eclipse of July 11, 2010 in Argentina, with no evidence of a precession change of the pendulum's oscillation plane (< 0.3 degree per hour).[29]
Aether hypothesis
[edit]Maurice Allais states that the eclipse effect is related to a gravitational anomaly that is inexplicable in the framework of the currently admitted theory of gravitation, without giving any explanation of his own.[30] Allais's explanation for another anomaly (the lunisolar periodicity in variations of the azimuth of a pendulum) is that space evinces certain anisotropic characteristics, which he ascribes to motion through an aether which is partially entrained by planetary bodies.
His hypothesis leads to a speed of light dependent on the moving direction with respect to a terrestrial observer, since the Earth moves within the aether but the rotation of the Moon induces a "wind" of about 8 km/s. Thus Allais rejects Einstein's interpretation of the Michelson–Morley experiment and the subsequent verification experiments of Dayton Miller.[31][32]
In particular, the Michelson–Morley experiment did not give a zero speed difference, but at most 8 km/s, without being able to detect any regularity. This difference was therefore interpreted as due to measurement uncertainties. Similarly, Miller's experiments corroborated these results over a long period of time, but Miller could not explain the source of the irregularities. At the time, temperature problems were invoked to explain the cause, as concluded by Robert S. Shankland.[33] By re-analyzing the data from this experiment, Allais reported a periodicity using sidereal time rather than civil time used by Miller (daytime sidereal variation of the speed of light over a period of 23 hours 56 minutes with an amplitude of about 8 km/s).[34]
Applying the Titius–Bode law to the Earth–Moon system, which he generalizes to aether, Allais calculates a "wind" of 7.95 km/s, which is comparable to the values found by the experiments of Michelson and Miller. Hence Allais deduces that the aether turns with the stars, as proposed by the aether drag hypothesis, and is not fixed as Hendrik Lorentz thought when inventing his famous transformation and his ether theory. But the majority of scientists at the end of the 19th century imagined that such an aether crossed the Earth so that the rotation of the Earth around the Sun would cause an important variation of 30 km/s. Consequently, since the third postulate on which special relativity is based is the constancy of the speed of light in vacuum, Allais considers it unfounded. In order to measure a change in the speed of light, one would have to get back to the definition of the 1960 meter, since confidence in the theory of relativity nowadays is such that current metrology uses constancy of the speed of light as an axiom.
Allais summarized his experimental work in English in his 1999 memoir on behalf of NASA.[5] He detailed his aether hypothesis in the books L'Anisotropie de l'Espace, published in 1997,[30] and L'Effondrement de la Théorie de la Relativité, published in 2004.[35] A book on Allais's scientific legacy has been edited in English in 2011,[36] yet his aether hypothesis has not gained significant traction among mainstream scientists. Nevertheless, after Allais's death in 2010, experiments on the Allais effect continue.[37]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Hecht, Laurence (24 October 2010). "In Appreciation of Maurice Allais (1911-2010) The New Physical Field of Maurice Allais" (PDF). 21st Century Science & Technology. pp. 26–30.
- ^ Allais, M. (September 1959). "Should the Laws of Gravitation Be reconsidered? Part I – Abnormalities in the Motion of a Paraconical Pendulum on an Anisotropic Support" (PDF). Aero/Space Engineering: 46–52. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-07-20.
- ^ Allais, M. (October 1959). "Should the Laws of Gravitation Be reconsidered? Part II – Experiments in Connection with the Abnormalities Noted in the Motion of the Paraconical Pendulum With an Anisotropic Support" (PDF). Aero/Space Engineering: 51–55. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-06-22.
- ^ Allais, Maurice (1959). New theoretical and experimental research work on gravity. Memoir (Report).
- ^ a b c d Allais, Maurice (November 1999). The 'Allais Effect' and my experiments with the paraconical pendulum (1954-1960) (PDF). Memoir C-6083 prepared for NASA (Report).
- ^ Jeverdan, G. T.; Rusu, G. I.; Antonescu, V. I. (15 February 1961). "Date preliminare asupra comportarii unui pendul Foucault in timpul eclipsei de soare de la 15 februarie 1961" [Preliminary data about the behavior of a Foucault pendulum during the Sun eclipse of 15 February 15, 1961]. Annals of the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University (in Romanian). 7 (2): 457.
- ^ Jeverdan, G. T.; Rusu, G. I.; Antonescu, V. I. (1981). "Experiments using the Foucault pendulum during the solar eclipse of 15 February, 1961" (PDF). The Biblical Astronomer. 1 (55): 18–20. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-08-27. Retrieved 2017-03-28.
- ^ Saxl, Erwin J.; Allen, Mildred (15 February 1971). "1970 Solar Eclipse as 'Seen' by a Torsion Pendulum" (PDF). Physical Review D. 3 (4): 823–825. Bibcode:1971PhRvD...3..823S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.3.823. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-05-19. Retrieved 2017-03-27.
- ^ Savrov, L. A.; Yushkin, V. D. (January 1995). "Paraconical pendulum as a detector of gravitational effects during solar eclipses (processing data and results)" (PDF). Measurement Techniques. 38 (1). Springer Science+Business Media: 9–13. Bibcode:1995MeasT..38..253S. doi:10.1007/BF00976738. S2CID 120963357. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-03-29. Retrieved 2017-03-28.
- ^ Savrov, L. A. (March 1995). "Paraconical pendulum as a detector of gravitational effects during solar eclipses (processing data and results)" (PDF). Measurement Techniques. 38 (3). Springer Science+Business Media: 253–260. Bibcode:1995MeasT..38..253S. doi:10.1007/BF00977602. S2CID 122031984. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-03-29. Retrieved 2017-03-28.
- ^ Savrov, L. A. (April 2009). "Improved determination of variation of rate of rotation of oscillation plane of a paraconic pendulum during the solar eclipse in Mexico on July 11, 1991". Measurement Techniques. 52 (4). Springer Science+Business Media: 339–343. Bibcode:2009MeasT..52..339S. doi:10.1007/s11018-009-9291-6. S2CID 122985875.
- ^ Savrov, L. A. (June 1997). "Experiment with paraconic pendulums during the November 3, 1994 solar eclipse in Brazil". Measurement Techniques. 40 (6). Springer Science+Business Media: 511–516. Bibcode:1997MeasT..40..511S. doi:10.1007/BF02504372. S2CID 120976498.
- ^ Zhou, S. W.; Huang, B. J.; Ren, Z. M. (1995). "The abnormal influence of the partial solar eclipse on December 24th, 1992, on the time comparisons between atomic clocks". Il Nuovo Cimento C. 18 (2): 223–236. Bibcode:1995NCimC..18..223Z. doi:10.1007/BF02512022. S2CID 123012966.
- ^ Mishra, D. C.; Rao, M. B. S. Vyaghreswara (1997). "Temporal variation in gravity field during solar eclipse on 24 October 1995". Current Science. 72 (11): 782–783.
- ^ Wang, Q.S.; Yang, X.S.; Wu, C.Z.; Guo, G.H.; Liu, H.C.; Hua, C.C. (14 July 2000). "Precise measurement of gravity variations during a total solar eclipse" (PDF). Physical Review D. 62 (4): 041101. arXiv:1003.4947. Bibcode:2000PhRvD..62d1101W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.041101. S2CID 6846335.
- ^ Popescu, V. A.; Olenici, D. (August 2007). A confirmation of the Allais and Jeverdan-Rusu-Antonescu effects during the solar eclipse from 22 September 2006, and the quantization of behaviour of pendulum (PDF). 7th Biennial European SSE Meeting. Røros, Norway: Society for Scientific Exploration.
- ^ Goodey, T. J.; Pugach, A. F.; Olenici, D. (2010). "Correlated anomalous effects observed during a solar eclipse". Journal of Advanced Research in Physics. 1 (2). Archived from the original on 2017-03-29. Retrieved 2017-03-28.
- ^ Pugach, A. F.; Olenici, D. (2012). "Observations of Correlated Behavior of Two Light Torsion Balances and a Paraconical Pendulum in Separate Locations during the Solar Eclipse of January 26th, 2009" (PDF). Advances in Astronomy. 2012: 263818. Bibcode:2012AdAst2012E...2P. doi:10.1155/2012/263818.
- ^ Slichter, L. B.; Caputo, M.; Hager, C. L. (15 March 1965). "An experiment concerning gravitational shielding". Journal of Geophysical Research. 70 (6): 1541–1551. Bibcode:1965JGR....70.1541S. doi:10.1029/JZ070i006p01541.
- ^ Kuusela, T. (15 March 1991). "Effect of the solar eclipse on the period of a torsion pendulum". Physical Review D. 43 (6): 2041–2043. Bibcode:1991PhRvD..43.2041K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.43.2041. PMID 10013582.
- ^ Jun, Luo; Jianguo, Li; Xuerong, Zhang; Liakhovets, V.; Lomonosov, M.; Ragyn, A. (15 October 1991). "Observation of 1990 solar eclipse by a torsion pendulum". Physical Review D. 44 (8): 2611–2613. Bibcode:1991PhRvD..44.2611L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.2611. PMID 10014147.
- ^ Leslie Mullen (1999). "Decrypting the Eclipse". Archived copy of NASA web page. Archived from the original on 2008-05-16.
- ^ Dave Dooling (12 October 1999). "French Nobel Laureate turns back clock". NASA.
- ^ Thomas Goodey (2000). "Information available about what happened in the NASA 1999 Eclipse Experiments". allais.wiki.
- ^ Yang, Xin-She; Wang, Qian-Shen (October 2002). "Gravity Anomaly During the Mohe Total Solar Eclipse and New Constraint on Gravitational Shielding Parameter" (PDF). Astrophysics and Space Science. 282 (1): 245–253. Bibcode:2002Ap&SS.282..245Y. doi:10.1023/A:1021119023985. S2CID 118497439. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-01-12. Retrieved 2017-03-27.
- ^ Van Flandern, T.; Yang, X. S. (15 January 2003). "Allais gravity and pendulum effects during solar eclipses explained" (PDF). Physical Review D. 67 (2): 022002. Bibcode:2003PhRvD..67b2002V. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.022002.
- ^ Phil McKenna (19 July 2009). "July eclipse is best chance to look for gravity anomaly". NewScientist.
- ^ "Eclipse at Sheshan Hill". The Atlantic. July 2009.
- ^ Salva, Horacio R. (15 March 2011). "Searching the Allais effect during the total sun eclipse of 11 July 2010". Physical Review D. 83 (6): 067302. Bibcode:2011PhRvD..83f7302S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.067302.
- ^ a b Allais, Maurice (1997). L'Anisotropie de l'Espace [The Anisotropy of Space] (PDF) (in French). Clément Juglar Editions. ISBN 978-2908735093.
- ^ Miller, Dayton C. (July 1933). "The Ether-Drift experiment and the determination of the absolute motion of the Earth" (PDF). Reviews of Modern Physics. 5 (3): 203–254. Bibcode:1933RvMP....5..203M. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.5.203. S2CID 4119615.
- ^ Allais, Maurice (1998). "The experiments of Dayton C. Miller (1925-1926) and the theory of relativity" (PDF). 21st Century Science & Technology. pp. 26–32.
- ^ Shankland, R. S.; McCuskey, S. W..; Leone, F. C.; Kuerti, G. (April 1955). "New Analysis of the Interferometer Observations of Dayton C. Miller". Reviews of Modern Physics. 27 (2): 167–178. Bibcode:1955RvMP...27..167S. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.27.167.
- ^ Deloly, Jean-Bernard. "The re-examination of Miller's interferometric observations and of Esclangon's observations". Maurice Allais Foundation.
- ^ Allais, Maurice (2004). L'Effondrement de la Théorie de la Relativité – Implication irréfragable des données de l'expérience [The Collapse of the Theory of Relativity – Irrefutable implication of the empirical data] (in French). Clément Juglar Editions. ISBN 978-2908735185.
- ^ Múnera, Héctor A., ed. (May 2011). Should the Laws of Gravitation be Reconsidered?: The Scientific Legacy of Maurice Allais. Apeiron. ISBN 978-0986492655.
- ^ Deloly, Jean-Bernard (22 April 2016). "Continuation given to Maurice Allais's experimental works. State of the situation (2015)" (PDF). Maurice Allais Foundation.
External links
[edit]- Maurice Allais Foundation website (English version)
- Maurice Allais, Ten Notes published in the Proceedings of the French Academy of Sciences (Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'Académie des Sciences), dated 4/11/57, 13/11/57, 18/11/57, 13/5/57, 4/12/57, 25/11/57, 3/11/58, 22/12/58, 9/2/59, and 19/1/59, available in French at http://allais.wiki/alltrans/allaisnot.htm, some also in English translation.
- Thomas J. Goodey, "Professor Maurice Allais – a genius before his time – as are they all" (Web site claiming to be the internet base of researchers studying and publicizing the Allais effect; includes copies/translations of several of the above papers.)
- Ed Oberg "www.iasoberg.com" This site has been established by Ed Oberg to facilitate and promote research into the Allais Effect and to distribute the resulting findings. The launch of this site (23 November 2007) coincided with the launch of a hypothetical field model developed by Ed Oberg.
- Göde Wissenschafts Stiftung "Experimental measuring results with the paraconical pendulum Archived 2006-12-08 at the Wayback Machine