Jump to content

Malchus (historian): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SmackBot (talk | contribs)
m Date/fix the maintenance tags or gen fixes using AWB
Monkbot (talk | contribs)
m Task 20: replace {lang-??} templates with {langx|??} ‹See Tfd› (Replaced 1);
 
(41 intermediate revisions by 35 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Byzantine historian}}
'''Malchus''' was a [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine]] historian. According to [[Suda]] Malchus was a Byzantine; but the statement of [[Photius]] that he was a native of [[Philadelphia]], is preferable; and his [[Syria]]c name makes it probable that Philadelphia was the city so called (the ancient Rabbah) in the country of Ammonitis, east of the Jordan.
{{refimprove|date=October 2012}}


'''Malchus''' ({{langx|grc|Μάλχος, Málkhos}}) was a 5th-century [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine]] historian of an Arab origin from the city of Philadelphia (nowadays [[Amman]]). According to the ''[[Suda]]'', Malchus was a Byzantine (i.e. from Constantinople); but [[Photios I of Constantinople|Photius]] states that he was a native of Philadelphia; the ancient [[Rabbah]] in the country of Ammonitis, east of the [[River Jordan]]. His name makes it probable that he originally came from the Arab people around Philadelphia, as his name is alike the Arab name Malek (مالك) .
Malchus probably followed his profession of [[rhetor]]ician or sophist at [[Constantinople]], and the statement that he was a native of that city may have arisen from that circumstance. According to [[Suda]], he wrote a history extending from the reign of [[Constantine I]] to that of [[Anastasius I (emperor)|Anastasius I]]; but the work in seven books, of which Photius has given an account (Bibl. cod. 78), and to which he gives the title Βυζανταικα, comprehended only the period from the final sickness of the Eastern em­peror [[Leo I (emperor)|Leo I]] (473 or 474), to the death of [[Julius Nepos]], emperor of the West (480). It has been supposed that this was an extract from the work mentioned by Suidas, or a mutilated copy: that it was incomplete is attested by Photius him­self, who says that the commencement of the first of the seven books showed that the author had already written some previous portions, and that the close of the seventh book showed his intention of carrying it further, if his life was spared.


Malchus probably followed his profession of [[rhetor]]ician or sophist at [[Constantinople]]. According to [[Suda]], he wrote a history extending from the reign of [[Constantine I]] to that of [[Anastasius I (emperor)|Anastasius I]]; but the work in seven books, of which Photius has given an account (Bibl. cod. 78), and to which he gives the title ''{{lang|grc|Βυζαντιακά}}'', comprehended only the period from the final sickness of the Eastern emperor [[Leo I (emperor)|Leo I]] (473 or 474), to the death of [[Julius Nepos]], emperor of the West (480). It has been supposed that this was an extract from the work mentioned by Suidas, or a mutilated copy: that it was incomplete is said by Photius himself, who says that the start of the first of the seven books showed that the author had already written some previous parts, and that the close of the seventh book showed his intention of carrying it further, if his life was spared.
Some eminent critics, among whom is [[Henri Valois|Valesius]] (''Not. in Excerpt, de Legat.'') have thought that the history of Malchus began with Leo's sickness, and that he was the continuator of Priscus, whose history is supposed to have left off at that point. Niebuhr (''De Historicis'') supposed that this coincidence arosa from Photius having met with a portion only of the work of Malchus, which had been inserted in some historical Catena after the work of Priscus; or that the history of the antecedent period had been given by Malchus in another work. As, however, Suidas speaks of the history in its whole extent, as one work, we are rather disposed to think it was published in successive parts, as the author was able to finish it (a sup­position which best coincides with the notice in Photius of the continuation being contingent on the longer duration of the author's life); and that Photius had met with only one part.


Some scholars, among them [[Henri Valois|Valesius]],<ref>''{{lang|la|Not. in Excerpt, de Legat.}}''</ref> have thought that the history of Malchus began with Leo's sickness, and that he was the continuator of Priscus, whose history is supposed to have left off at that point. [[Barthold Georg Niebuhr]]<ref>''{{lang|la|De Historicis}}''</ref> supposed that this coincidence arose from Photius having met with a portion only of the work of Malchus, which had been inserted in some historical [[Catena (biblical commentary)|Catena]] after the work of [[Priscus]]; or that the history of the previous period had been given by Malchus in another work. Suidas speaks of the history in its whole extent; it may have been published in successive parts, as the author was able to finish it; and Photius possibly had met with only one part.
Photius praises the style of Malchus as a perfect model of historical composition; pure, free from redundancy and consisting of well-selected words and phrases. He notices also his eminence as a rhetorician, and says that he was favourable to Christianity; a statement which has been thought inconsistent with the praises he has be­stowed on the heathen philosopher and diviner, Pamprepius. The works of Malchus are lost, except the portions contained in the ''Excerpta'' of [[Constantine VII]], and some extracts in Suda.


Photius praises the style of Malchus as a model of historical composition; pure, free from redundancy and consisting of well-selected words and phrases. He notices also his eminence as a rhetorician, and says that he was favourable to [[Christianity]]; a statement which has been thought inconsistent with the praises for [[Pamprepius]]. The works of Malchus are lost, except the portions contained in the ''[[Constantinian Excerpts|Excerpta]]'' of [[Constantine VII]], and some extracts in Suda.
==References==
* {{SmithDGRBM}}


== References ==
[[Category:Byzantine historians]]
* {{DGRBM|title=Malchus|url=http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/ACL3129.0002.001/917?rgn=full+text;view=image;q1=Malchus}}


==Notes==
[[it:Malco (storico)]]
{{Reflist}}

==External links==
The surviving portions of his works, in Greek and with Latin translations, can be found in the ''Fragmenta historicorum Graecorum'' of [[Karl Wilhelm Ludwig Müller]], vol. 4. [https://books.google.com/books?id=LoAPAAAAYAAJ]
{{Byzantine historians}}
{{Authority control}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Malchus}}
[[Category:5th-century Byzantine historians]]

Latest revision as of 11:04, 29 October 2024

Malchus (Ancient Greek: Μάλχος, Málkhos) was a 5th-century Byzantine historian of an Arab origin from the city of Philadelphia (nowadays Amman). According to the Suda, Malchus was a Byzantine (i.e. from Constantinople); but Photius states that he was a native of Philadelphia; the ancient Rabbah in the country of Ammonitis, east of the River Jordan. His name makes it probable that he originally came from the Arab people around Philadelphia, as his name is alike the Arab name Malek (مالك) .

Malchus probably followed his profession of rhetorician or sophist at Constantinople. According to Suda, he wrote a history extending from the reign of Constantine I to that of Anastasius I; but the work in seven books, of which Photius has given an account (Bibl. cod. 78), and to which he gives the title Βυζαντιακά, comprehended only the period from the final sickness of the Eastern emperor Leo I (473 or 474), to the death of Julius Nepos, emperor of the West (480). It has been supposed that this was an extract from the work mentioned by Suidas, or a mutilated copy: that it was incomplete is said by Photius himself, who says that the start of the first of the seven books showed that the author had already written some previous parts, and that the close of the seventh book showed his intention of carrying it further, if his life was spared.

Some scholars, among them Valesius,[1] have thought that the history of Malchus began with Leo's sickness, and that he was the continuator of Priscus, whose history is supposed to have left off at that point. Barthold Georg Niebuhr[2] supposed that this coincidence arose from Photius having met with a portion only of the work of Malchus, which had been inserted in some historical Catena after the work of Priscus; or that the history of the previous period had been given by Malchus in another work. Suidas speaks of the history in its whole extent; it may have been published in successive parts, as the author was able to finish it; and Photius possibly had met with only one part.

Photius praises the style of Malchus as a model of historical composition; pure, free from redundancy and consisting of well-selected words and phrases. He notices also his eminence as a rhetorician, and says that he was favourable to Christianity; a statement which has been thought inconsistent with the praises for Pamprepius. The works of Malchus are lost, except the portions contained in the Excerpta of Constantine VII, and some extracts in Suda.

References

[edit]
  •  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainSmith, William, ed. (1870). "Malchus". Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology.

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Not. in Excerpt, de Legat.
  2. ^ De Historicis
[edit]

The surviving portions of his works, in Greek and with Latin translations, can be found in the Fragmenta historicorum Graecorum of Karl Wilhelm Ludwig Müller, vol. 4. [1]