Jump to content

The Revolt of the Masses: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Monkbot (talk | contribs)
m Task 20: replace {lang-??} templates with {langx|??} ‹See Tfd› (Replaced 1);
 
(38 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|1929 book by José Ortega y Gasset}}
{{Italic title}}
{{Expand German|Der Aufstand der Massen|date=March 2023}}
{{Refimprove|date=May 2010}}
{{Refimprove|date=May 2010}}
{{Infobox book
| name=The Revolt of the Masses
| author=[[José Ortega y Gasset]]
| title_orig=La rebelión de las masas
| pub_date=1929
}}
'''''The Revolt of the Masses''''' ({{langx|es|La rebelión de las masas}}, {{IPA|es|la reβeˈljon de las ˈmasas|pron}}) is a book by [[José Ortega y Gasset]]. It was first published as a series of articles in the newspaper ''[[El Sol (Madrid)|El Sol]]'' in 1929, and as a book in 1930; the English translation, first published two years later, was authorized by Ortega. While the published version notes that the translator asked to remain anonymous, more recent editions also record that its US copyright was renewed in 1960 by a Teresa Carey, and the [[US Copyright Office]]'s published list of US copyright renewals for January 1960 gives the translator as J. R. Carey.


A second translation was published in 1985 by the [[University of Notre Dame Press]] in association with [[W. W. Norton & Co.]] This translation was completed by Anthony Kerrigan (translator) and Kenneth Moore (editor). An introduction was written by novelist [[Saul Bellow]].
'''''The Revolt of the Masses''''' is the English translation of [[José Ortega y Gasset|José Ortega y Gasset's]] book ''La rebelión de las masas.'' The Spanish original was first published as a series of articles in the newspaper ''[[El Sol (Madrid)|El Sol]]'' in 1929 and as a book in 1930; the English translation, first published two years later, was authorized by Ortega. While the published version notes that the translator requested to remain anonymous, more recent editions also record that its US copyright was renewed in 1960 by a Teresa Carey, and the US Copyright Office's published list of US copyright renewals for January 1960 gives the translator as J. R. Carey.


== Summary ==
A second translation was published in 1985 by the University of Notre Dame Press in association with W.W. Norton and Co. This translation was completed by Anthony Kerrigan (translator) and Kenneth Moore (editor). An introduction was written by novelist [[Saul Bellow]].
In this work, Ortega traces the genesis of the "mass-man" and analyzes his constitution, ''en route'' to describing the rise to power and action of the masses in society. Ortega is throughout quite critical of both the masses and the mass-men of which they are made up, contrasting "noble life and common life" and excoriating the barbarism and primitivism he sees in the mass-man.


In this work, Ortega traces the genesis of the "mass-man" and analyzes his constitution en route to describing the rise to power and action of the masses in society. Ortega is throughout quite critical of both the masses and the mass-men of which they are made up, contrasting "noble life and common life" and excoriating the barbarism and primitivism he sees in the mass-man. He does not, however, refer to specific social classes, as has been so commonly misunderstood in the English-speaking world. Ortega states that the mass-man could be from any social background, but his specific target is the [[Bourgeoisie|bourgeois]] educated man, the ''señorito satisfecho'' (satisfied young man or Mr. Satisfied), the specialist who believes he has it all and extends the command he has of his subject to others, contemptuous of his ignorance in all of them. Ortega's summary of what he attempted in the book exemplifies this quite well, while simultaneously providing the author's own views on his work: "In this essay an attempt has been made to sketch a certain type of European, mainly by analyzing his behaviour as regards the very civilization into which he was born". This had to be done because that individual "does not represent a new civilisation struggling with a previous one, but a mere negation ..."
He does not, however, refer to specific social classes, as has been so commonly misunderstood in the English-speaking world. Ortega states that the mass-man could be from any social background, but his specific target is the [[Bourgeoisie|bourgeois]] educated man, the ''señorito satisfecho'' (satisfied young man, or Mr. Satisfied), the specialist who believes he has it all and extends the command he has of his subject to others, contemptuous of his ignorance in all of them.
Ortega's summary of what he attempted in the book exemplifies this quite well, while simultaneously providing the author's own views on his work: "In this essay an attempt has been made to sketch a certain type of European, mainly by analyzing his behaviour as regards the very civilization into which he was born". This had to be done because that individual "does not represent a new civilisation struggling with a previous one, but a mere negation ..."


==Notable quotes==
==Notable quotes==
{{Quote
:"As they say in the United States: “to be different is to be indecent. The mass crushes beneath it everything that is different, everything that is excellent, individual, qualified and select. Anybody who is not like everybody, who does not think like everybody, runs the risk of being eliminated. And it is clear, of course, that this “everybody” is not “everybody. “Everybody” was normally the complex unity of the mass and the divergent, specialised minorities. Nowadays, “everybody” is the mass alone. Here we have the formidable fact of our times, described without any concealment of the brutality of its features." (Chapter 1: The Coming of the Masses)
|text=As they say in the United States: "to be different is to be indecent." The mass crushes beneath it everything that is different, everything that is excellent, individual, qualified and select. Anybody who is not like everybody, who does not think like everybody, runs the risk of being eliminated. And it is clear, of course, that this "everybody" is not "everybody." "Everybody" was normally the complex unity of the mass and the divergent, specialized minorities. Nowadays, "everybody" is the mass alone. Here we have the formidable fact of our times, described without any concealment of the brutality of its features.
|title=Chapter 1, "The Coming of the Masses"
}}


{{Quote
:"The Fascist and Syndicalist species were characterized by the first appearance of a type of man who ''did not care to give reasons or even to be right'', but who was simply resolved to impose his opinions. That was the novelty: the right not to be right, not to be reasonable: 'the reason of unreason.'" (Chapter 8: Why the Masses Intervene in Everything and Why They Always Intervene Violently)
|text=The Fascist and Syndicalist species were characterized by the first appearance of a type of man who "did not care to give reasons or even to be right", but who was simply resolved to impose his opinions. That was the novelty: the right not to be right, not to be reasonable: "the reason of unreason."
|title=Chapter 8, "Why the Masses Intervene in Everything and Why They Always Intervene Violently"
}}


==See also==
==See also==
*[[Ortega hypothesis]]
[[Technocracy]]
*[[Technocracy]]
*[[Mass culture]]


==References==
==References==
* Pedro Blas Gonzalez. [https://books.google.com/books?id=pYf-WTk_R_gC ''Ortega's 'The Revolt of the Masses' and the Triumph of the New Man''], Algora Publishing, 2007.
{{reflist}}


==External links==
==External links==
Line 31: Line 52:
| and link back to that category using the {{dmoz}} template. |
| and link back to that category using the {{dmoz}} template. |
======================= {{Don't Advertise}} =====================-->
======================= {{Don't Advertise}} =====================-->
{{wikiquote}}
* [http://www.historyguide.org/europe/gasset.html Ortega y Gasset's Revolt of the Masses (excerpt)]
* [http://www.historyguide.org/europe/gasset.html Ortega y Gasset's Revolt of the Masses (excerpt)]
* [http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/01/05/the-smartest-book-about-our-digital-age-was-published-in-1929.html How The Revolt of the Masses Anticipated the Digital Age (Ted Gioia)]
* [http://pinkmonkey.com/dl/library1/revolt.pdf Revolt of the Masses (PDF)]
* [http://pinkmonkey.com/dl/library1/revolt.pdf Revolt of the Masses (PDF)]
* [http://recursostic.educacion.es/bachillerato/proyectofilosofia/version/v1/ortega_i2.htm LA REBELIÓN DE LAS MASA]
* [http://recursostic.educacion.es/bachillerato/proyectofilosofia/version/v1/ortega_i2.htm LA REBELIÓN DE LAS MASAS]

{{Political philosophy}}
{{Authority control}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Revolt of the Masses, The}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Revolt of the Masses, The}}

[[Category:1930 books]]
[[Category:1930 non-fiction books]]
[[Category:Books in political philosophy]]
[[Category:Books in political philosophy]]
[[Category:Contemporary philosophical literature]]
[[Category:Contemporary philosophical literature]]
[[Category:Works by José Ortega y Gasset]]

Latest revision as of 19:13, 29 October 2024

The Revolt of the Masses
AuthorJosé Ortega y Gasset
Original titleLa rebelión de las masas
Publication date
1929

The Revolt of the Masses (Spanish: La rebelión de las masas, pronounced [la reβeˈljon de las ˈmasas]) is a book by José Ortega y Gasset. It was first published as a series of articles in the newspaper El Sol in 1929, and as a book in 1930; the English translation, first published two years later, was authorized by Ortega. While the published version notes that the translator asked to remain anonymous, more recent editions also record that its US copyright was renewed in 1960 by a Teresa Carey, and the US Copyright Office's published list of US copyright renewals for January 1960 gives the translator as J. R. Carey.

A second translation was published in 1985 by the University of Notre Dame Press in association with W. W. Norton & Co. This translation was completed by Anthony Kerrigan (translator) and Kenneth Moore (editor). An introduction was written by novelist Saul Bellow.

Summary

[edit]

In this work, Ortega traces the genesis of the "mass-man" and analyzes his constitution, en route to describing the rise to power and action of the masses in society. Ortega is throughout quite critical of both the masses and the mass-men of which they are made up, contrasting "noble life and common life" and excoriating the barbarism and primitivism he sees in the mass-man.

He does not, however, refer to specific social classes, as has been so commonly misunderstood in the English-speaking world. Ortega states that the mass-man could be from any social background, but his specific target is the bourgeois educated man, the señorito satisfecho (satisfied young man, or Mr. Satisfied), the specialist who believes he has it all and extends the command he has of his subject to others, contemptuous of his ignorance in all of them.

Ortega's summary of what he attempted in the book exemplifies this quite well, while simultaneously providing the author's own views on his work: "In this essay an attempt has been made to sketch a certain type of European, mainly by analyzing his behaviour as regards the very civilization into which he was born". This had to be done because that individual "does not represent a new civilisation struggling with a previous one, but a mere negation ..."

Notable quotes

[edit]

As they say in the United States: "to be different is to be indecent." The mass crushes beneath it everything that is different, everything that is excellent, individual, qualified and select. Anybody who is not like everybody, who does not think like everybody, runs the risk of being eliminated. And it is clear, of course, that this "everybody" is not "everybody." "Everybody" was normally the complex unity of the mass and the divergent, specialized minorities. Nowadays, "everybody" is the mass alone. Here we have the formidable fact of our times, described without any concealment of the brutality of its features.

— Chapter 1, "The Coming of the Masses"

The Fascist and Syndicalist species were characterized by the first appearance of a type of man who "did not care to give reasons or even to be right", but who was simply resolved to impose his opinions. That was the novelty: the right not to be right, not to be reasonable: "the reason of unreason."

— Chapter 8, "Why the Masses Intervene in Everything and Why They Always Intervene Violently"

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]