Jump to content

Talk:Cockroach: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
 
(41 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 27: Line 27:
|topic=Natural science
|topic=Natural science
}}
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|vital=yes|1=
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Biology|class=GA}}
{{WikiProject Insects|class=GA|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Insects|importance=Top}}
}}
{{archive box|auto=yes}}
{{archive box|auto=yes}}


{{Talk:Cockroach/GA2}}
{{Talk:Cockroach/GA2}}


=Unlock please=
==Unlock please==
Why is this page locked again? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/106.133.171.205|106.133.171.205]] ([[User talk:106.133.171.205#top|talk]]) 04:40, 17 December 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Why is this page locked again? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/106.133.171.205|106.133.171.205]] ([[User talk:106.133.171.205#top|talk]]) 04:40, 17 December 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Kafka ==
== Vagueness on pest species and species associated with humans ==


I am surprised that there isn't a mention of Franz Kafka's 1915 novella, Metamophosis.[[User:Sussmanbern|Sussmanbern]] ([[User talk:Sussmanbern|talk]]) 00:38, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
In several different places, the article refers to a subset of cockroach species that are either viewed as pests or relevant to humans, however nowhere is this subset characterized, much less enumerated. Specifically, I'm referring to statements like this:
:In the lede: "About 30 cockroach species out of 4,600 are associated with human habitats. About four species are well known as pests."


:This shouldn't be mentioned here. There is no agreement that "cockroach" is the correct translation, and in fact, prominent academics (e.g., [[Vladimir Nabokov]]) believe the character was transformed into a beetle rather than a roach. See [[The_Metamorphosis#Translations_of_the_opening_sentence]]. [[User:Dyanega|Dyanega]] ([[User talk:Dyanega|talk]]) 16:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
:In "Distribution and Habitat": "Only about four widespread species are commonly regarded as pests."


== They need to add something (if not already there) ==
:In the subsection "As pests", under "Relationship with Humans": "The Blattodea include some thirty species of cockroaches associated with humans; these species are atypical of the thousands of species in the order."


They Should add:
:In "Conservation": "While a small minority of cockroaches are associated with human habitats and viewed as repugnant by many people"
Cockroaches can still wiggle there body without a head, and the heads enteni can still move without the body!


By: [[User:Wiki Fan49346824908|Wiki Fan49346824908]] ([[User talk:Wiki Fan49346824908|talk]]) 17:23, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
While all these claims are sourced, the information is a bit tangential to the sources themselves; currently the two sources for the claim of "about four" species being pests, for example, are scholarly papers on the efficacy of particular pesticides, not a survey of roach species. Since I'm not familiar enough with the subject to chase this down, I have to suggest: we should name the "about four" pest species specifically, and somehow collectively characterize the other 30 that are associated with humans. That is, are they all from a common taxon, share a geographical origin, have some set of common characteristics? Or, more generally, answer the question of why this subset of species associated with humans, and what this subset is. As it stands, I think it leaves open a frustrating question and is too vague and even weasely. [[User:Siafu|siafu]] ([[User talk:Siafu|talk]]) 02:25, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 20 August 2018 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Cockroach|answered=yes}}
Please undo the latest edit by {{u|Bubblesorg}}, which is both misspelled and wrong. Following Taxonomy and evolution, Carboniferous "cockroaches" are not actually cockroaches, and are just stem-cockroaches. If need be, the lede could also be clarified to reflect this. [[Special:Contributions/2001:569:782B:7A00:91FF:58D7:E53:BD14|2001:569:782B:7A00:91FF:58D7:E53:BD14]] ([[User talk:2001:569:782B:7A00:91FF:58D7:E53:BD14|talk]]) 02:24, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
:[[File:Yellow check.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Partly done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> The edit's been undone by Cwmhiraeth, but the lede could still use clarification. Thanks Anon. [[User:Adrian J. Hunter|Adrian&nbsp;'''J.'''&nbsp;Hunter]]<sup>([[User talk:Adrian J. Hunter|talk]]•[[Special:contributions/Adrian J. Hunter|contribs]])</sup> 07:37, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 2 August 2019 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Cockroach|answered=yes}}
IN THE UPPER RIGHT CORNER OF THE ARTICLE COCKROACH:

Cockroach
Temporal range: 145–0 Ma
PreЄ Є O S D C P T J K Pg N
Cretaceous–recent

THE WORD 'CRETACEOUS' SHOULD BE CHANGED TO 'CARBONIFEROUS'. THE DATE '145' SHOULD BE ALSO CHANGED ACCORDINGLY. [[Special:Contributions/31.59.14.250|31.59.14.250]] ([[User talk:31.59.14.250|talk]]) 21:02, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' please provide [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:EP --> [[User:Willbb234|Willbb234]] ([[User talk:Willbb234|talk]]) 10:30, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

== Revision deleted? ==

I am wondering when and why was a revision made on 02:50, 1 May 2017, was completed hidden from the log? Can anyone explain who hided it?--&#9656; ‎[[user:Épine|<b style="color:purple;font-size:13px;display:inline-block;border:1px solid purple">épine</b>]] [[user talk:Épine|<sub><b style="color:black;font-size:11px">talk</b><span style="color:purple">&#9836;</span></sub>]] 19:06, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

:Based on [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A%C3%89pine&type=revision&diff=780738755&oldid=770729419| comments made on your talk page when you did this], it was extremely offensive vandalism that merited permanent deletion. [[User:Dyanega|Dyanega]] ([[User talk:Dyanega|talk]]) 20:05, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:58, 30 October 2024

Good articleCockroach has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 17, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
December 8, 2015Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 2, 2016.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a few cockroach species (example pictured) are kept as pets, and several species are raised as food for insectivorous pets?
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Cockroach/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dunkleosteus77 (talk · contribs) 02:54, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by Dunkleosteus77

[edit]
  • I haven't read it yet, but the one thing I noticed was that the In research section was just one sentence, so consider expanding that (if you can); expand in areas such as: why do people research on cockroaches opposed to other insects, and what discoveries have been made (that benefit humans)
@Dunkleosteus77: Added a section on its convenience and use in education. The major discovery areas have already been listed and wikilinked. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:13, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • and, since the As pests and Control are basically talking about the same thing, consider merging them.
Done. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is a mish-mash of American and British English; I'm seeing "generalised", "generalized" (in the same paragraph), "realised", "colors", "recognize", "characterised", "specialisation", and "behavior"

Done a few edits, although I cannot guarantee that I removed all British English spelling. Please double check. Burklemore1 (talk) 06:50, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It'll pass
Many thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:38, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

General comments

[edit]

In the section on biological control the ""House Centipede" namely Scutigera coleoptrata, is known to feed on cockroaches.

  • In the lead, change "...which however also includes the termites" to "...which also includes termites"
Done. Burklemore1 (talk) 06:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Taxonomy and evolution section, change "However recent genetic evidence..." to "However, recent genetic evidence..."
Done. Burklemore1 (talk) 06:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Taxonomy and evolution section, change "...when F. A. McKittrick noted similar..." to "...when F. A. McKittrick (1965) noted similar..."
Done. Burklemore1 (talk) 06:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Description section, include the weight of Blaberus giganteus
Removed mention of its weght. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Description section, change :They have relatively small heads and broad, flattened bodies, and..." to "They have a relatively small head and a broad, flattened body, and..."
Done. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Description section, change "The tegmina or first pair of wings are tough and protective..." to "The tegmina, or first pair of wings, are tough and protective..."
Done. Burklemore1 (talk) 06:43, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Description section, change "...have demonstrated they help..." to "...have demonstrated that they help..."
Done. Burklemore1 (talk) 06:50, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • n the Description section, change "Males have a aedeagus..." to "Males have an aedeagus..."
Done. Burklemore1 (talk) 06:43, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Collective decision-making section, explain what happened in the roach-robot experiment
Done. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:07, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Expect more comments, I haven't finished reading yet.

Thanks for taking this on. We look forward to your additional comments. Burklemore1 (talk) 06:41, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2nd set of comments

[edit]
  • In the Social behavior section, change "...the sum of individual choices but reflects..." to "...the sum of individual choices, but reflects..."
Done. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Social behavior section, put the last paragraph, second seconds, in quotes using template {{pull quote|1=insert quote and source}}, and also state who said it
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:22, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have stated "Lihoreau and his fellow researchers stated:", and if they didn't say it, then I don't know who did. I haven't got access to the research study. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:04, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Sounds section, change "...in the presence of a potential mate some..." to "...in the presence of a potential mate, some..."
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:17, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Instead of wikilinking American cockroach in the Digestive track section, wikilink it in the Social behavior
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:17, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Digestive track section, change "...(Periplaneta americana) for example feeds..." to "...(Periplaneta americana), for example, feeds..."
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:17, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Digestive track section, change " In many species these..." to " In many species, these..."
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:17, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Digestive track section, change "...the wood-eating cockroach Panesthia cribrata is able..." to "...the wood-eating cockroach, Panesthia cribrata, is able..."
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:17, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Digestive track section, change " It my be that..." to " It may be that..."
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:17, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Reproduction section, change "...keeping the eggs inside their bodies..." to "...keeping the eggs inside their body..."
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:17, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Hardiness section, change "P. japonica" to "Periplaneta japonica", since the genus wasn't stated
Done. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:10, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Conservation section, what does NSW stand for?
Done, linked. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:11, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the In culture section, change " 'For tetanus cockroach tea is given...' " to " 'For tetanus, cockroach tea is given...' "
No, it's as it is in the original, inside quotation marks. I've added a comment to this effect. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:12, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unlock please

[edit]

Why is this page locked again? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.133.171.205 (talk) 04:40, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kafka

[edit]

I am surprised that there isn't a mention of Franz Kafka's 1915 novella, Metamophosis.Sussmanbern (talk) 00:38, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This shouldn't be mentioned here. There is no agreement that "cockroach" is the correct translation, and in fact, prominent academics (e.g., Vladimir Nabokov) believe the character was transformed into a beetle rather than a roach. See The_Metamorphosis#Translations_of_the_opening_sentence. Dyanega (talk) 16:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They need to add something (if not already there)

[edit]

They Should add: Cockroaches can still wiggle there body without a head, and the heads enteni can still move without the body!

By: Wiki Fan49346824908 (talk) 17:23, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cockroach&oldid=1254372800"