False statement: Difference between revisions
Added content. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Ira Leviton (talk | contribs) Fixed a reference. Please see Category:CS1 errors: dates and Category:CS1 maint: url-status. |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Statement contradicted by facts and reality}} |
|||
A '''false statement''', also known as a '''falsehood''', '''falsity''', '''misstatement''' or '''untruth''', is a [[Statement (logic)|statement]] that is [[False (logic)|false]] or does not align with [[reality]]. This concept spans various fields, including [[communication]], [[law]], [[linguistics]], and [[philosophy]]. It is considered a fundamental issue in human [[discourse]]. The [[intentional]] dissemination of |
A '''false statement''', also known as a '''falsehood''', '''falsity''', '''misstatement''' or '''untruth''', is a [[Statement (logic)|statement]] that is [[False (logic)|false]] or does not align with [[reality]]. This concept spans various fields, including [[communication]], [[law]], [[linguistics]], and [[philosophy]]. It is considered a fundamental issue in human [[discourse]]. The [[intentional]] [[dissemination]] of misstatements ([[disinformation]]) is commonly termed as [[deception]] or [[lying]], while unintentional inaccuracies may arise from [[misconceptions]], [[misinformation]], or [[Error|mistakes]]. |
||
Although the word ''[[fallacy]]'' is sometimes used as a synonym for ''false statement'', that is not how the word is used in most formal contexts. |
Although the word ''[[fallacy]]'' is sometimes used as a synonym for ''false statement'', that is not how the word is used in most formal contexts. |
||
==Overview== |
|||
==Examples of false statements== |
|||
===Characteristics=== |
|||
;Misleading statement (lie) |
|||
*[[Intention]]: Misstatements can be made deliberately with the intent to deceive or unintentionally due to misconception. |
|||
John told his little brother that [[sea otters]] aren't mammals, but fish, even though John himself was a [[marine biologist]] and knew otherwise. John simply wanted to see his little brother fail his class report, in order to teach him to begin projects early, which help him develop skills necessary to succeed in life. |
|||
*Consequences: Impact of misstatements can vary, ranging from minor misconceptions to significant societal repercussions. In legal contexts, [[making false statements]] can have serious repercussions such as [[defamation]], [[fraud]], or [[perjury]]. The accuracy of statements is pivotal in maintaining [[Trust (social science)|trust]] within [[interpersonal relationships]], professional settings, and broader societal structures. |
|||
===Types=== |
|||
;Statement made out of ignorance |
|||
*[[Lie]]: Deliberate misstatement intended to [[deceive]]. |
|||
James, John's brother, stated in his class report that sea otters were fish. James got an F after his teacher pointed out why that statement was false. James did not know that sea otters were in fact mammals because he heard that sea otters were fish from his older brother John, a marine biologist. |
|||
*[[Misinformation]]: Inaccurate information spread without the intent to deceive. |
|||
*[[Disinformation]]: Misinformation spread with the intent to deceive and manipulate opinions. |
|||
===Causes and Motivations=== |
|||
Understanding the motivations behind misstatements is complex. Individuals may lie to protect themselves, gain an advantage, [[Manipulation (psychology)|manipulate]] [[perceptions]], or evade [[accountability]]. Psychological factors, societal pressures, and [[cognitive biases]] can contribute to the inclination to make misstatements. [[Cognitive dissonance]] may also play a role when individuals resist acknowledging the falsity of their statements. |
|||
The [[ethics]] surrounding misstatements are multifaceted. Honest communication is often considered a fundamental value, but [[ethical dilemmas]] may arise in situations where the truth conflicts with other moral principles or when individuals face personal or professional consequences for [[honesty]]. |
|||
===Detection and Correction=== |
|||
*[[Fact checking]]: Verification of statements through fact-checking organizations helps identify and correct misinformation. |
|||
*[[Technology]] plays a role in both the spread and prevention of misinformation, with algorithms and [[Artificial intelligence in fraud detection|artificial intelligence]] being employed to identify and combat false narratives. |
|||
*[[Media literacy]]: Promoting media literacy can empower individuals to critically evaluate information and discern between true and false statements. |
|||
===Historical Examples=== |
|||
*[[Propaganda]]: Throughout history, misstatements have been used in propaganda to manipulate public opinion during times of war or political unrest. |
|||
*[[Political campaign]]: Throughout history, misstatements have played significant roles in shaping narratives, influencing [[public opinion]], discrediting [[dissidents]] and affecting political landscapes. |
|||
==== In math ==== |
|||
===== [[2 + 2 = 5]] ===== |
|||
This is a [[Mathematics|mathematical]] falsehood. A lot of people have tried to prove it, like this here:<syntaxhighlight lang="markdown"> |
|||
1 ÷ 2 = 0.5 |
|||
1 ÷ 35 = 0.02857142857 |
|||
You can see that the answer gets smaller and smaller as the dividend gets bigger and bigger so if 1 ÷ n = x then as n approaches infinity x approaches zero, so 1 ÷ ∞ = 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000...1 |
|||
Where ... is replaced with infinite zeroes. |
|||
This value is basically 0. You could say 1 ÷ ∞ ≈ 0 (with the approximately equal sign) |
|||
This means that 1 ÷ 0 ≈ ∞ which means 0 × ∞ ≈ 1 (because of fact families) |
|||
If 0 × ∞ ≈ 1 then that means that (0 × ∞) + (0 × ∞) ≈ 2. |
|||
We can simplify to (0 + 0) × ∞ ≈ 2 |
|||
Then to 0 × ∞ ≈ 2 |
|||
But we already said 0 × ∞ ≈ 1 |
|||
So 1 ≈ 2 (approximately) |
|||
We can also say that (0 × ∞) + (0 × ∞) + (0 × ∞) + (0 × ∞) ≈ 4 |
|||
Which means (0 + 0 + 0 + 0) × ∞ ≈ 4 |
|||
Which again means 0 × ∞ ≈ 4 |
|||
We can also do (0 × ∞) + (0 × ∞) + (0 × ∞) + (0 × ∞) + (0 × ∞) ≈ 5 |
|||
Which means (0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0) × ∞ ≈ 5 |
|||
Which means 0 × ∞ ≈ 5 |
|||
Which means 4 ≈ 5 |
|||
We know that 2 + 2 = 4 |
|||
And since 4 ≈ 5 we can say 2 + 2 ≈ 5 (approximately) |
|||
</syntaxhighlight><ref>{{Cite web |last=Jones |first=Samuel Fox |date=October 29, 2024 |title=Facebook |url=https://www.facebook.com/fox.jones.79/posts/pfbid05fdv6E9YBj7kTv5gJNq6sjco7LZ8RdLEg7eUszi1ygzvKakwNyX729TGeCBQfherl?notif_id=1730246056637817¬if_t=feedback_reaction_generic&ref=notif |website=Facebook}}</ref> |
|||
This is incorrect because [[infinity]] is not a number. |
|||
==In law== |
==In law== |
||
In some [[jurisdiction]]s, false statement is a [[crime]] similar to [[perjury]]. |
In some [[jurisdiction]]s, false statement is a [[crime]] similar to [[perjury]]. |
||
===United States=== |
===United States=== |
||
{{main|Making false statements}} |
{{main|Making false statements}} |
||
In U.S. law, a "false statement" generally refers to United States federal false statements statute, contained in {{USC|18|1001}}. Most commonly, prosecutors use this statute to reach cover-up crimes such as [[perjury]], false declarations, and [[obstruction of justice]] and government [[fraud]] cases.<ref>{{cite book | last= Strader | first= Kelly J. | title= Understanding White Collar Crime | edition= 2}}</ref> Its earliest progenitor was the [[False Claims Act]] of 1863,<ref>[[Hubbard v. United States]], {{ussc|514|695|1995}}</ref> and in 1934 the [[element (criminal law)|requirement]] of an [[mens rea|intent]] to defraud was eliminated to enforce the [[National Industrial Recovery Act]] of 1933 (NIRA) against producers of "hot oil", oil produced in violation of production restrictions established pursuant to the NIRA.<ref>{{cite court | litigants= [[:wikisource:United States v. Gilliland|United States v. Gilliland]] | vol= 312 | reporter= US | opinion= 86 | pinpoint= 93-94 | date= 1941 | quote= Legislation had been sought by the Secretary of the Interior to aid the enforcement of laws relating to the functions of the Department of the Interior and, in particular, to the enforcement of regulations under Sec. 9(c) of the [NIRA].}}</ref> |
In U.S. law, a "false statement" generally refers to United States federal false statements statute, contained in {{USC|18|1001}}. Most commonly, prosecutors use this statute to reach cover-up crimes such as [[perjury]], false declarations, and [[obstruction of justice]] and government [[fraud]] cases.<ref>{{cite book | last= Strader | first= Kelly J. | title= Understanding White Collar Crime | edition= 2}}</ref> Its earliest progenitor was the [[False Claims Act]] of 1863,<ref>[[Hubbard v. United States]], {{ussc|514|695|1995}}</ref> and in 1934 the [[element (criminal law)|requirement]] of an [[mens rea|intent]] to defraud was eliminated to enforce the [[National Industrial Recovery Act]] of 1933 (NIRA) against producers of "hot oil", oil produced in violation of production restrictions established pursuant to the NIRA.<ref>{{cite court | litigants= [[:wikisource:United States v. Gilliland|United States v. Gilliland]] | vol= 312 | reporter= US | opinion= 86 | pinpoint= 93-94 | date= 1941 | quote= Legislation had been sought by the Secretary of the Interior to aid the enforcement of laws relating to the functions of the Department of the Interior and, in particular, to the enforcement of regulations under Sec. 9(c) of the [NIRA].}}</ref> |
||
Latest revision as of 19:54, 30 October 2024
A false statement, also known as a falsehood, falsity, misstatement or untruth, is a statement that is false or does not align with reality. This concept spans various fields, including communication, law, linguistics, and philosophy. It is considered a fundamental issue in human discourse. The intentional dissemination of misstatements (disinformation) is commonly termed as deception or lying, while unintentional inaccuracies may arise from misconceptions, misinformation, or mistakes.
Although the word fallacy is sometimes used as a synonym for false statement, that is not how the word is used in most formal contexts.
Overview
[edit]Characteristics
[edit]- Intention: Misstatements can be made deliberately with the intent to deceive or unintentionally due to misconception.
- Consequences: Impact of misstatements can vary, ranging from minor misconceptions to significant societal repercussions. In legal contexts, making false statements can have serious repercussions such as defamation, fraud, or perjury. The accuracy of statements is pivotal in maintaining trust within interpersonal relationships, professional settings, and broader societal structures.
Types
[edit]- Lie: Deliberate misstatement intended to deceive.
- Misinformation: Inaccurate information spread without the intent to deceive.
- Disinformation: Misinformation spread with the intent to deceive and manipulate opinions.
Causes and Motivations
[edit]Understanding the motivations behind misstatements is complex. Individuals may lie to protect themselves, gain an advantage, manipulate perceptions, or evade accountability. Psychological factors, societal pressures, and cognitive biases can contribute to the inclination to make misstatements. Cognitive dissonance may also play a role when individuals resist acknowledging the falsity of their statements.
The ethics surrounding misstatements are multifaceted. Honest communication is often considered a fundamental value, but ethical dilemmas may arise in situations where the truth conflicts with other moral principles or when individuals face personal or professional consequences for honesty.
Detection and Correction
[edit]- Fact checking: Verification of statements through fact-checking organizations helps identify and correct misinformation.
- Technology plays a role in both the spread and prevention of misinformation, with algorithms and artificial intelligence being employed to identify and combat false narratives.
- Media literacy: Promoting media literacy can empower individuals to critically evaluate information and discern between true and false statements.
Historical Examples
[edit]- Propaganda: Throughout history, misstatements have been used in propaganda to manipulate public opinion during times of war or political unrest.
- Political campaign: Throughout history, misstatements have played significant roles in shaping narratives, influencing public opinion, discrediting dissidents and affecting political landscapes.
In math
[edit]This is a mathematical falsehood. A lot of people have tried to prove it, like this here:
1 ÷ 2 = 0.5
1 ÷ 35 = 0.02857142857
You can see that the answer gets smaller and smaller as the dividend gets bigger and bigger so if 1 ÷ n = x then as n approaches infinity x approaches zero, so 1 ÷ ∞ = 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000...1
Where ... is replaced with infinite zeroes.
This value is basically 0. You could say 1 ÷ ∞ ≈ 0 (with the approximately equal sign)
This means that 1 ÷ 0 ≈ ∞ which means 0 × ∞ ≈ 1 (because of fact families)
If 0 × ∞ ≈ 1 then that means that (0 × ∞) + (0 × ∞) ≈ 2.
We can simplify to (0 + 0) × ∞ ≈ 2
Then to 0 × ∞ ≈ 2
But we already said 0 × ∞ ≈ 1
So 1 ≈ 2 (approximately)
We can also say that (0 × ∞) + (0 × ∞) + (0 × ∞) + (0 × ∞) ≈ 4
Which means (0 + 0 + 0 + 0) × ∞ ≈ 4
Which again means 0 × ∞ ≈ 4
We can also do (0 × ∞) + (0 × ∞) + (0 × ∞) + (0 × ∞) + (0 × ∞) ≈ 5
Which means (0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0) × ∞ ≈ 5
Which means 0 × ∞ ≈ 5
Which means 4 ≈ 5
We know that 2 + 2 = 4
And since 4 ≈ 5 we can say 2 + 2 ≈ 5 (approximately)
This is incorrect because infinity is not a number.
In law
[edit]In some jurisdictions, false statement is a crime similar to perjury.
United States
[edit]In U.S. law, a "false statement" generally refers to United States federal false statements statute, contained in 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Most commonly, prosecutors use this statute to reach cover-up crimes such as perjury, false declarations, and obstruction of justice and government fraud cases.[2] Its earliest progenitor was the False Claims Act of 1863,[3] and in 1934 the requirement of an intent to defraud was eliminated to enforce the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 (NIRA) against producers of "hot oil", oil produced in violation of production restrictions established pursuant to the NIRA.[4]
The statute criminalizes a government official who "knowingly and willfully":[5]
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry.
See also
[edit]- Misinformation
- Fake news
- False accusation
- False statements of fact
- Jumping to conclusions
- Making false statements
References
[edit]- ^ Jones, Samuel Fox (October 29, 2024). "Facebook". Facebook.
- ^ Strader, Kelly J. Understanding White Collar Crime (2 ed.).
- ^ Hubbard v. United States, 514 U.S. 695 (1995)
- ^ United States v. Gilliland, 312 US 86, 93-94 (1941) ("Legislation had been sought by the Secretary of the Interior to aid the enforcement of laws relating to the functions of the Department of the Interior and, in particular, to the enforcement of regulations under Sec. 9(c) of the [NIRA].").
- ^ 18 U.S.C. § 1001