Jump to content

Peter Geach: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
 
(46 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|British philosopher}}
{{Short description|British philosopher (1916–2013)}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2013}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2013}}
{{Use British English|date=August 2012}}
{{Use British English|date=August 2012}}
Line 24: Line 24:
| doctoral_advisor =
| doctoral_advisor =
| academic_advisors =
| academic_advisors =
| influences = {{flatlist|
* [[Thomas Aquinas]]
* [[Aristotle]]
* [[Gotlob Frege]]
* [[J. M. E. McTaggart]]{{sfn|Kerr|2002}}
* [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]]
}}
| main_interests = {{ubl | [[History of philosophy]] | [[Philosophical logic]] | [[Philosophy of religion]]}}
| main_interests = {{ubl | [[History of philosophy]] | [[Philosophical logic]] | [[Philosophy of religion]]}}
| institutions = {{ubl | [[University of Birmingham]] | [[University of Leeds]]}}
| institutions = {{ubl | [[University of Birmingham]] | [[University of Leeds]]}}
Line 37: Line 30:
| notable_works =
| notable_works =
| notable_ideas = {{hlist | [[Analytical Thomism]] | [[Cambridge change]] | [[Frege–Geach problem]] | [[omnipotence paradox]]}}
| notable_ideas = {{hlist | [[Analytical Thomism]] | [[Cambridge change]] | [[Frege–Geach problem]] | [[omnipotence paradox]]}}
| influenced = {{flatlist|
* [[G. E. M. Anscombe]]
* [[Brian Davies (philosopher)|Brian Davies]]
* [[Michael Dummett]]{{sfn|Dummett|1981|p=xv}}
* [[Anthony Kenny]]
* [[Alasdair MacIntyre]]
* [[C. J. F. Williams]]
}}
}}
}}

'''Peter Thomas Geach'''{{efn|Pronounced {{IPAc-en|ɡ|iː|tʃ}}}} {{post-nominals|country=GBR|FBA}} (29 March 1916 – 21 December 2013) was a British philosopher who was Professor of [[Logic]] at the [[University of Leeds]]. His areas of interest were [[philosophical logic]], [[ethics]], [[history of philosophy]], [[philosophy of religion]] and the theory of [[Identity (philosophy)|identity]].
'''Peter Thomas Geach'''{{efn|Pronounced {{IPAc-en|ɡ|iː|tʃ}}}} {{post-nominals|country=GBR|FBA}} (29 March 1916 – 21 December 2013) was a British philosopher who was Professor of [[Logic]] at the [[University of Leeds]]. His areas of interest were [[philosophical logic]], [[ethics]], [[history of philosophy]], [[philosophy of religion]] and the theory of [[Identity (philosophy)|identity]].


==Early life==
==Early life==
Peter Geach was born in [[Metropolitan Borough of Chelsea|Chelsea]], [[County of London|London]], on 29 March 1916.{{sfnm |1a1=Geach |1y=1991 |1p=1 |2a1=Teichmann}} He was the only son of George Hender Geach and his wife Eleonora Frederyka Adolfina ''[[née]]'' Sgonina.{{sfnm |1a1=Geach |1y=1991 |2a1=Kenny |2y=2015}} His father, who was employed in the [[Indian Education Service|Indian Educational Service]], would go on to work as a professor of philosophy in [[Lahore]] and later as the principal of a teacher-training college in [[Peshawar District|Peshawar]].<ref>{{Cite news|last=O'Grady|first=Jane|date=2013-12-26|title=Peter Geach obituary|language=en-GB|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/education/2013/dec/26/peter-geach|access-date=2020-11-02|issn=0261-3077}}</ref>{{sfn|Geach|1991}}
Peter Geach was born in [[Metropolitan Borough of Chelsea|Chelsea]], [[County of London|London]], on 29 March 1916.{{sfnm |1a1=Geach |1y=1991 |1p=1 |2a1=Teichmann|2y=2017}} He was the only son of George Hender Geach and his wife Eleonora Frederyka Adolfina ''[[née]]'' Sgonina.{{sfnm |1a1=Geach |1y=1991 |2a1=Kenny |2y=2015}} His father, who was employed in the [[Indian Education Service|Indian Educational Service]], would go on to work as a professor of philosophy in [[Lahore]] and later as the principal of a teacher-training college in [[Peshawar District|Peshawar]].<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|last=O'Grady|first=Jane|date=2013-12-26|title=Peter Geach obituary|language=en-GB|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/education/2013/dec/26/peter-geach|access-date=2020-11-02|issn=0261-3077}}</ref>{{sfn|Geach|1991}}


His parents' marriage was unhappy and quickly broke up.{{sfn|Geach|1991|p=1}} Until the age of four, he lived with his maternal grandparents, who were [[Polish people|Polish]] immigrants, in [[Cardiff]].{{sfn|Geach|1991|p=1}} After this time he was placed in the care of a guardian (until his father returned to Britain) and contact with his mother and her parents ceased.{{sfn|Geach|1991|p=1}} He attended [[The Cathedral School, Llandaff|Llandaff Cathedral School]] in Cardiff and, later, [[Clifton College]].{{sfn|Muirhead|1948|p=448}}
His parents' marriage was unhappy and quickly broke up.{{sfn|Geach|1991|p=1}} Until the age of four, he lived with his maternal grandparents, who were [[Polish people|Polish]] immigrants, in [[Cardiff]].{{sfn|Geach|1991|p=1}} After this time he was placed in the care of a guardian (until his father returned to Britain) and contact with his mother and her parents ceased.{{sfn|Geach|1991|p=1}} He attended [[The Cathedral School, Llandaff|Llandaff Cathedral School]] in Cardiff and, later, [[Clifton College]].{{sfn|Muirhead|1948|p=448}}

His father, who had studied with [[Bertrand Russell]] and [[G. E. Moore]] at Cambridge, taught him philosophy starting with logic.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zTmcEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA44|page=44|title=The Creation of Wittgenstein: Understanding the Roles of Rush Rhees, Elizabeth Anscombe and Georg Henrik Von Wright|author=Thomas H. Wallgreen|publisher=[[Bloomsbury Publishing]]|year=2023|isbn=9781350121119}}</ref>


In 1934 Geach won a scholarship to [[Balliol College, Oxford]], graduating in 1938 with [[first-class honours]] in ''[[literae humaniores]]''.<ref name="leeds2" />{{sfn|Kenny|2015|p=186}} At Oxford, he increasingly engaged in intellectual clashes with Catholics, through which he discovered the Catholic faith, later converting to the [[Roman Catholic Church]].{{sfnm |1a1=Geach |1y=1991 |1p=7 |2a1=Kenny |2y=2015 |2p=186}} He later described it:
In 1934 Geach won a scholarship to [[Balliol College, Oxford]], graduating in 1938 with [[first-class honours]] in ''[[literae humaniores]]''.<ref name="leeds2" />{{sfn|Kenny|2015|p=186}} At Oxford, he increasingly engaged in intellectual clashes with Catholics, through which he discovered the Catholic faith, later converting to the [[Roman Catholic Church]].{{sfnm |1a1=Geach |1y=1991 |1p=7 |2a1=Kenny |2y=2015 |2p=186}} He later described it:
Line 59: Line 47:
Geach spent a year (1938–39)<ref name="leeds2" /> as a Gladstone Research Student, based at [[Gladstone's Library|St Deiniol's Library]], Hawarden.{{sfn|Kenny|2015|p=188}}
Geach spent a year (1938–39)<ref name="leeds2" /> as a Gladstone Research Student, based at [[Gladstone's Library|St Deiniol's Library]], Hawarden.{{sfn|Kenny|2015|p=188}}


Geach refused to join the British Army in the [[Second World War]] and, as a [[conscientious objector]], was employed in the war years in timber production.<ref>[https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/1529/09_Geach_1820.pdf The British Academy, Peter Thomas Geach by Anthony Kenny, page 188]</ref> Following the end of the war in 1945, he undertook further research at [[University of Cambridge|Cambridge]].
Geach refused to join the British Army in the [[Second World War]] and, as a [[conscientious objector]], was employed in the war years in timber production.<ref>[https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/1529/09_Geach_1820.pdf The British Academy, Peter Thomas Geach by Anthony Kenny, page 188]</ref> Though Geach himself recounts that he did later try, unsuccessfully, to join the [[Free Polish Army]].{{sfn|Geach|1991|p=12}}
Following the end of the war in 1945, he undertook further research at [[University of Cambridge|Cambridge]].


In 1951, Geach was appointed to his first substantive academic post, as assistant lecturer at the [[University of Birmingham]], going on to become [[Reader (academic rank)|Reader]] in Logic. In 1966 Geach resigned in protest at the University’s decision to create an Institute of Contemporary Culture. In his resignation letter he said he had no wish to stay at a university which "preferred Pop Art to Logic".<ref>[https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/1529/09_Geach_1820.pdf The British Academy, Peter Thomas Geach by Anthony Kenny, page 195]</ref> In the same year he was appointed Professor of Logic in the Department of [[Philosophy]] at the [[University of Leeds]].<ref name="leeds2" /><ref name=anscombe/> Geach retired from his Leeds chair in 1981 with the title [[Emeritus]] Professor of Logic.<ref name="leeds">{{cite web |title=Emeritus Professors |url=http://www.leeds.ac.uk/calendar/emeritus.htm |url-status=dead |location=Leeds |publisher=University of Leeds |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120926134723/http://www.leeds.ac.uk/calendar/emeritus.htm |archive-date=26 September 2012 |access-date=11 November 2017}}</ref>
In 1951, Geach was appointed to his first substantive academic post, as assistant lecturer at the [[University of Birmingham]], going on to become [[Reader (academic rank)|Reader]] in Logic. In 1966 Geach resigned in protest at the University’s decision to create an Institute of Contemporary Culture. In his resignation letter he said he had no wish to stay at a university which "preferred Pop Art to Logic".<ref>[https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/1529/09_Geach_1820.pdf The British Academy, Peter Thomas Geach by Anthony Kenny, page 195]</ref> In the same year he was appointed Professor of Logic in the Department of [[Philosophy]] at the [[University of Leeds]].<ref name="leeds2" /><ref name=anscombe/> Geach retired from his Leeds chair in 1981 with the title [[Emeritus]] Professor of Logic.<ref name="leeds">{{cite web |title=Emeritus Professors |url=http://www.leeds.ac.uk/calendar/emeritus.htm |url-status=dead |location=Leeds |publisher=University of Leeds |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120926134723/http://www.leeds.ac.uk/calendar/emeritus.htm |archive-date=26 September 2012 |access-date=11 November 2017}}</ref>
Line 70: Line 60:
Geach defends the Thomistic position that human beings are essentially [[rationalism|rational]] animals, each one miraculously created. He dismissed [[Darwinistic]] attempts to regard reason as inessential to humanity, as "mere sophistry, laughable, or pitiable." He repudiated any capacity for [[Animal language|language in animals]] as mere "association of manual signs with things or performances."{{sfn|Murray|2002}}
Geach defends the Thomistic position that human beings are essentially [[rationalism|rational]] animals, each one miraculously created. He dismissed [[Darwinistic]] attempts to regard reason as inessential to humanity, as "mere sophistry, laughable, or pitiable." He repudiated any capacity for [[Animal language|language in animals]] as mere "association of manual signs with things or performances."{{sfn|Murray|2002}}


Geach dismissed both pragmatic and epistemic conceptions of truth, commending a version of the [[correspondence theory of truth|correspondence theory]] proposed by [[Thomas Aquinas]]. He argues that there is one reality rooted in God himself, who is the ultimate truthmaker. God, according to Geach, ''is'' truth. While they lived, he saw [[Willard Van Orman Quine|W.&nbsp;V. Quine]] and [[Arthur Prior]] as his allies, in that they held three truths: that there are no non-existent beings; that a proposition can occur in discourse without being there asserted; and that the sense of a term does not depend on the truth of the proposition in which it occurs. He is said to have invented the famous ethical example of the stuck potholer,{{citation needed|date=November 2020}} when arguing against the idea that it might be right to kill a child to save its mother.
Geach dismissed both pragmatic and epistemic conceptions of truth, commending a version of the [[correspondence theory of truth|correspondence theory]] proposed by [[Thomas Aquinas]]. He argues that there is one reality rooted in God himself, who is the ultimate truthmaker. God, according to Geach, ''is'' truth. While they lived, he saw [[Willard Van Orman Quine|W.&nbsp;V. Quine]] and [[Arthur Prior]] as his allies, in that they held three truths: that there are no non-existent beings; that a proposition can occur in discourse without being there asserted; and that the sense of a term does not depend on the truth of the proposition in which it occurs. He is said to have invented the famous ethical example of the stuck potholer,<ref name=":0" /> when arguing against the idea that it might be right to kill a child to save their mother.

In [[metaethics]], a debate developed in the 1960s and 1970s as to whether it was possible to logically derive categorical 'ought' statements from 'is' statements. The debate famously involved [[R. M. Hare|Richard Hare]], [[Max Black]], [[Philippa Foot]] and [[John Searle]] among others. Geach made a notable contribution to this debate with a paper published in 1977, which purported to derive one categorical 'ought' from purely factual premises.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Geach |first=Peter |year=1977 |title=Again the Logic of 'Ought' |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3749546 |journal=Philosophy |volume=52 |issue=211 |pages=473–476 |doi=10.1017/S0031819100028953 |jstor=3749546 |s2cid=170494772 |url-access=registration |access-date=21 August 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Hurka |first=Thomas |year=1980 |title=Geach on Deriving Categorical 'Oughts' |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3750979 |journal=Philosophy |volume=55 |issue=211 |pages=101–104 |doi=10.1017/S0031819100063786 |jstor=3750979 |s2cid=170323838 |url-access=registration |access-date=21 August 2021}}</ref>


Geach has famously argued that the notion of [[Identity (philosophy)|absolute identity]] should be abandoned, to be replaced with relative identity predicates.<ref name="oxford"/><ref>https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity/</ref>
In [[metaethics]], a debate developed in the 1960s and 1970s as to whether it was possible to logically derive categorical 'ought' statements from 'is' statements. The debate famously involved [[R. M. Hare|Richard Hare]], [[Max Black]], [[Philippa Foot]] and [[John Searle]] among others. Geach made a notable contribution to this debate with a paper published in 1977, which purported to derive one categorical 'ought' from purely factual premises.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Geach |first=Peter |year=1977 |title=Again the Logic of 'Ought' |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3749546 |url-access=limited |journal=Philosophy |volume=52 |issue=211 |pages=473–476 |doi=10.1017/S0031819100028953 |jstor=3749546 |s2cid=170494772 |access-date=21 August 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Hurka |first=Thomas |year=1980 |title=Geach on Deriving Categorical 'Oughts' |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3750979 |url-access=limited |journal=Philosophy |volume=55 |issue=211 |pages=101–104 |doi=10.1017/S0031819100063786 |jstor=3750979 |s2cid=170323838 |access-date=21 August 2021}}</ref>


==Honours==
==Honours==
Line 78: Line 70:


==Marriage and children==
==Marriage and children==
His wife and occasional collaborator was the philosopher [[G. E. M. Anscombe|Elizabeth Anscombe]].<ref name=anscombe/> Both converts to [[Catholic Church|Catholicism]], they were married at [[Brompton Oratory]] in 1941 and went on to have seven children.<ref name=telegraph/> They co-authored the 1961 book ''Three Philosophers'', with Anscombe contributing a section on [[Aristotle]] and Geach one each on Aquinas and [[Gottlob Frege]].<ref name=anscombe/> For a quarter century they were leading figures in the Philosophical Enquiry Group, an annual confluence of Catholic philosophers held at [[Armitage Park|Spode House]] in Staffordshire that was established by [[Columba Ryan]] in 1954.<ref name=times/>
His wife and occasional collaborator was the philosopher [[G. E. M. Anscombe|Elizabeth Anscombe]].<ref name=anscombe/> Both converts to [[Catholic Church|Catholicism]], they were married at [[Brompton Oratory]] in 1941 and went on to have seven children.<ref name=telegraph/> They co-authored the 1961 book ''Three Philosophers'', with Anscombe contributing a section on [[Aristotle]] and Geach one each on Aquinas and [[Gottlob Frege]].<ref name=anscombe/> For a quarter century they were leading figures in the Philosophical Enquiry Group, an annual confluence of Catholic philosophers held at Spode House in Staffordshire that was established by [[Columba Ryan]] in 1954.<ref name=times/>


==Death==
==Death==
Line 85: Line 77:
==Works==
==Works==
{{Incomplete list|date=July 2016}}
{{Incomplete list|date=July 2016}}
*{{cite book |editor1=Geach, Peter |editor2=Black, Max |title=Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege |edition= 1st |location=Oxford |publisher=Basil Blackwell |year=1952 <!--isbn=-->}}
*{{cite book |editor1=Geach, Peter |editor2=Black, Max |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/translationsfrom0000pete |title=Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege |edition=1st |location=Oxford |publisher=Basil Blackwell |year=1952 <!--isbn=-->}} 2nd ed. (1960), 3rd ed. (1980)
*''[[iarchive:philosophicalwri0000desc_b8k7|Descartes: Philosophical Writings]]'' (with G.E.M. Anscombe) (1954) Introduction by [[Alexandre Koyré|Alexandre Koyre]]
**{{cite book |editor1=Geach, Peter |editor2=Black, Max |editor1-mask=1 |editor2-mask=1 |title=Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege |edition= 2nd |location=Oxford |publisher=Basil Blackwell |year=1960 <!--isbn=-->}}
**{{cite book |editor1=Geach, Peter |editor2=Black, Max |editor1-mask=1 |editor2-mask=1 |title=Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege |edition= 3rd |location=Oxford |publisher=Basil Blackwell |year=1980 <!--isbn=-->}}
*''Descartes: Philosophical Writings'' (with G.E.M. Anscombe) (1954) Introduction by Alexander Koyre
*"Good and Evil," ''Analysis'' (1956), Reprinted in [[Philippa Foot|Foot, Philippa]] (<abbr>ed.</abbr>) ''[[iarchive:theoriesofethics0000unse s7o0/page/64/mode/1up|Theories of Ethics]]'' (1967).  United States: Oxford University Press. pp.&nbsp;64–73.
*"Good and Evil," ''Analysis'' (1956), Reprinted in [[Philippa Foot|Foot, Philippa]] (<abbr>ed.</abbr>) ''[[iarchive:theoriesofethics0000unse s7o0/page/64/mode/1up|Theories of Ethics]]'' (1967).  United States: Oxford University Press. pp.&nbsp;64–73.
* ''[[iarchive:in.ernet.dli.2015.223704|Mental Acts: Their Content and Their Objects]]'', 1957/1997
* ''[[iarchive:in.ernet.dli.2015.223704|Mental Acts: Their Content and Their Objects]]'', 1957/1997
* ''Three Philosophers: Aristotle; Aquinas; Frege'' (with G.E.M. Anscombe), 1961
* ''[[iarchive:three-philosophers-by-peter-thomas-geach-gertrude-elizabeth-margaret-anscombe|Three Philosophers: Aristotle; Aquinas; Frege]]'' (with G.E.M. Anscombe), 1961
* ''[[iarchive:referencegeneral00geac 1|Reference and Generality: An Examination of Some Medieval and Modern Theories]]'', 1962
* ''[[iarchive:referencegeneral00geac 1|Reference and Generality: An Examination of Some Medieval and Modern Theories]]'', 1962
* "Ascriptivism." ''Philosophical Review'' 69 (2):221-225, 1960, reprinted in [[Richard Rorty]] (ed.) ''[[iarchive:linguisticturn0000rich|The Linguistic Turn]]'' (1967)
* ''[https://studylib.net/doc/8115846/plato-s--euthyphro---an-analysis-and-commentary|PLATO'S "EUTHYPHRO": An Analysis and Commentary]'', July, 1966
* '[https://studylib.net/doc/8115846/plato-s--euthyphro---an-analysis-and-commentary|PLATO'S "PLATO'S EUTHYPHRO": An Analysis and Commentary''<nowiki/>'''], ''[[The Monist]]'' Vol. 50, No. 3, July, 1966
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20210618115827/https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/2105/51p321.pdf "Some Problems about Time"] ''Proceedings of the British Academy 51, 1965'' ,1966
* ''[[iarchive:historyofcorrupt0000geac|History of the Corruptions of Logic]]'', inaugural lecture, University of Leeds, 1968
* ''[[iarchive:historyofcorrupt0000geac|History of the Corruptions of Logic]]'', inaugural lecture, University of Leeds, 1968
* [[iarchive:aquinascollectio00kenn/page/29|"Form and Existence"]] In: [[Anthony Kenny|Kenny, A.]] (eds) ''[[iarchive:aquinascollectio00kenn|Aquinas. Modern Studies in Philosophy]]''. Palgrave Macmillan, London. {{doi|10.1007/978-1-349-15356-5_3}} (1969)
* [[iarchive:aquinascollectio00kenn/page/139/mode/1up|"Nominalism"]] In: Kenny, A. (eds) ''[[iarchive:aquinascollectio00kenn|Aquinas. Modern Studies in Philosophy]]''. Palgrave Macmillan, London. {{doi|10.1007/978-1-349-15356-5_6}} (1969)
* ''[[iarchive:godsoul0000geac|God and the Soul]]'', 1969/2001
* ''[[iarchive:godsoul0000geac|God and the Soul]]'', 1969/2001
* "A Program for Syntax" (1970). ''Synthèse'' 22:3-17.
* "A Program for Syntax" (1970). ''Synthèse'' 22:3-17. reprinted in: [[Donald Davidson (philosopher)|Davidson]] & [[Gilbert Harman|Harman]] (edc.) ''[[iarchive:semanticsofnatur00davi|Semantics of natural language]]'' (1972)
* [[iarchive:logicmatters0000geac|''Logic Matters'']], 1972
* [[iarchive:logicmatters0000geac|''Logic Matters'']], 1972
* ''[[iarchive:reasonargument0000geac|Reason and Argument]]'', 1976
* ''[[iarchive:reasonargument0000geac|Reason and Argument]]'', 1976
Line 102: Line 96:
* ''[[iarchive:providenceevil0000geac|Providence and Evil: The Stanton Lectures 1971-2]]'', 1977
* ''[[iarchive:providenceevil0000geac|Providence and Evil: The Stanton Lectures 1971-2]]'', 1977
* ''[[iarchive:trent 0116301857813|The Virtues: The Stanton Lectures 1973-4]]'', 1977
* ''[[iarchive:trent 0116301857813|The Virtues: The Stanton Lectures 1973-4]]'', 1977
* ''Truth, Love, and Immortality: An Introduction to McTaggart's Philosophy'', 1979
* ''[[iarchive:truthloveimmorta0000geac|Truth, Love, and Immortality: An Introduction to McTaggart's Philosophy]]'', 1979
*[https://www.aristoteliansociety.org.uk/pdf/geach.pdf "Truth and God,"] ''[[Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society]],'' Supplementary Volume LVI, 1982, republished in ''Proceedings'' Virtual Issue No. 1, 2013
*"Truth and God," ''[[Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society]],'' Supplementary Volume LVI, 1982, republished in [https://web.archive.org/web/20231212152903/https://academic.oup.com/DocumentLibrary/Aristotelian/2013%20AS%20Virtual%20Issue.pdf ''Proceedings'' Virtual Issue No. 1, 2013]
* (edited) ''Wittgenstein's Lectures on Philosophical Psychology, 1946–47: Notes by P.T. Geach, K.J. Shah, and A.C. Jackson'', 1989
* (edited) ''Wittgenstein's Lectures on Philosophical Psychology, 1946–47: Notes by P.T. Geach, K.J. Shah, and A.C. Jackson'', 1989
* ''[[iarchive:logicethics0000unse|Logic and Ethics]]'' (edited by Jacek Holowka), 1990
* "Whatever Happened to Deontic Logic" reprinted in ''[[iarchive:logicethics0000unse|Logic and Ethics]]'' (edited by Geach with Jacek Holowka), 1990
* ''Truth and Hope: The Furst Franz Josef und Furstin Gina Lectures Delivered at the International Academy of Philosophy in the Principality of Liechtenstein, 1998'' ({{ISBN|0-268-04215-2}})
* ''[[iarchive:truthhopefurstfr0000geac|Truth and Hope: The Furst Franz Josef und Furstin Gina Lectures Delivered at the International Academy of Philosophy in the Principality of Liechtenstein, 1998]]'' 2001 ({{ISBN|0-268-04215-2}})
For more complete publication details see [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-94-015-7885-1%2F1.pdf "Bibliography of works of P.T. Geach"] (1991) by Harry A. Lewis.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/petergeachphilos0000unse |title=Peter Geach: Philosophical Encounters |date=1991 |publisher=Springer Netherlands |isbn=978-90-481-4072-5 |editor-last=Lewis |editor-first=Harry A. |location=Dordrecht |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-94-015-7885-1 |url-access=registration}}</ref>
For more complete publication details see [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-94-015-7885-1%2F1.pdf "Bibliography of works of P.T. Geach"] (1991) by Harry A. Lewis.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/petergeachphilos0000unse |title=Peter Geach: Philosophical Encounters |date=1991 |publisher=Springer Netherlands |isbn=978-90-481-4072-5 |editor-last=Lewis |editor-first=Harry A. |location=Dordrecht |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-94-015-7885-1 |url-access=registration}}</ref>


Line 124: Line 118:
<ref name=anscombe>{{cite news |last=Boxer |first=Sarah |date=13 January 2001 |title=G.&nbsp;E.&nbsp;M. Anscombe, 81, British Philosopher |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/13/world/g-e-m-anscombe-81-british-philosopher.html |work=The New York Times |page=B8 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130518061817/https://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/13/world/g-e-m-anscombe-81-british-philosopher.html |archive-date=18 May 2013 |access-date=24 January 2010}}</ref>
<ref name=anscombe>{{cite news |last=Boxer |first=Sarah |date=13 January 2001 |title=G.&nbsp;E.&nbsp;M. Anscombe, 81, British Philosopher |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/13/world/g-e-m-anscombe-81-british-philosopher.html |work=The New York Times |page=B8 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130518061817/https://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/13/world/g-e-m-anscombe-81-british-philosopher.html |archive-date=18 May 2013 |access-date=24 January 2010}}</ref>
<ref name=times>{{cite news |date=19 August 2009 |title=Father Columba Ryan: Priest, Teacher and University Chaplain |url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/obituaries/article6800925.ece?print=yes&randnum=1151003209000 |work=The Times |location=London |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100602074527/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/obituaries/article6800925.ece?print=yes&randnum=1151003209000 |archive-date=2 June 2010 |access-date=24 January 2010}}</ref>
<ref name=times>{{cite news |date=19 August 2009 |title=Father Columba Ryan: Priest, Teacher and University Chaplain |url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/obituaries/article6800925.ece?print=yes&randnum=1151003209000 |work=The Times |location=London |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100602074527/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/obituaries/article6800925.ece?print=yes&randnum=1151003209000 |archive-date=2 June 2010 |access-date=24 January 2010}}</ref>
<ref name=telegraph>{{cite news |date=6 January 2001 |title=Professor G&nbsp;E&nbsp;M Anscombe |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1313382/Professor-G-E-M-Anscombe.html |work=The Telegraph |location=London |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110605033421/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1313382/Professor-G-E-M-Anscombe.html |archive-date=5 June 2011 |access-date=27 July 2020}}</ref>
<ref name=telegraph>{{cite news |date=6 January 2001 |title=Professor G&nbsp;E&nbsp;M Anscombe |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1313382/Professor-G-E-M-Anscombe.html |work=The Telegraph |location=London |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110605033421/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1313382/Professor-G-E-M-Anscombe.html |archive-date=5 June 2011 |access-date=27 July 2020}}</ref> <ref name=oxford>{{cite book |last= |first= |author-link= |date= |title=The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics |url= |location= |publisher= |page=111-112 |isbn=}}</ref>
}}
}}


Line 144: Line 138:
|editor-last=Lewis
|editor-last=Lewis
|editor-first=Harry A.
|editor-first=Harry A.
|title=Peter Geach: Philosophical Encounters
|title=[[iarchive:petergeachphilos0000unse|Peter Geach: Philosophical Encounters]]
|series=Synthese Library
|series=Synthese Library
|location=Dordrecht, Netherlands
|location=Dordrecht, Netherlands
Line 242: Line 236:
|year=2011
|year=2011
|chapter=Geachianism
|chapter=Geachianism
|chapter-url=https://philpapers.org/archive/TODG.pdf
|editor-last=Kvanvig
|editor-last=Kvanvig
|editor-first=Jonathan L.
|editor-first=Jonathan L.
Line 252: Line 247:
|doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199603213.001.0001
|doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199603213.001.0001
|isbn=978-0-19-960321-3
|isbn=978-0-19-960321-3
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240117183214/https://philpapers.org/archive/TODG.pdf
|archive-date=17 January 2024
}}
}}
{{refend}}
{{refend}}
Line 292: Line 289:
[[Category:Fellows of Balliol College, Oxford]]
[[Category:Fellows of Balliol College, Oxford]]
[[Category:Fellows of the British Academy]]
[[Category:Fellows of the British Academy]]
[[Category:Historians of philosophy]]
[[Category:British historians of philosophy]]
[[Category:Metaphysicians]]
[[Category:British metaphysicians]]
[[Category:People educated at Clifton College]]
[[Category:People educated at Clifton College]]
[[Category:Philosophers of language]]
[[Category:British philosophers of language]]
[[Category:Philosophers of mind]]
[[Category:British philosophers of mind]]
[[Category:Philosophers of religion]]
[[Category:British philosophers of religion]]
[[Category:Thomists]]
[[Category:Analytical Thomists]]
[[Category:Wittgensteinian philosophers]]
[[Category:Wittgensteinian philosophers]]
[[Category:British logicians]]
[[Category:British logicians]]
[[Category:British conscientious objectors]]
[[Category:British conscientious objectors]]
[[Category:English people of Polish descent]]

Latest revision as of 23:15, 31 October 2024

Peter Geach
Geach in 1990
Born
Peter Thomas Geach

(1916-03-29)29 March 1916
Chelsea, London, England
Died21 December 2013(2013-12-21) (aged 97)
Cambridge, England
Alma materBalliol College, Oxford
Spouse
(m. 1941; died 2001)
[1]
Era20th-century philosophy
RegionWestern philosophy
SchoolAnalytical Thomism
Institutions
Main interests
Notable ideas

Peter Thomas Geach[a] FBA (29 March 1916 – 21 December 2013) was a British philosopher who was Professor of Logic at the University of Leeds. His areas of interest were philosophical logic, ethics, history of philosophy, philosophy of religion and the theory of identity.

Early life

[edit]

Peter Geach was born in Chelsea, London, on 29 March 1916.[2] He was the only son of George Hender Geach and his wife Eleonora Frederyka Adolfina née Sgonina.[3] His father, who was employed in the Indian Educational Service, would go on to work as a professor of philosophy in Lahore and later as the principal of a teacher-training college in Peshawar.[4][5]

His parents' marriage was unhappy and quickly broke up.[6] Until the age of four, he lived with his maternal grandparents, who were Polish immigrants, in Cardiff.[6] After this time he was placed in the care of a guardian (until his father returned to Britain) and contact with his mother and her parents ceased.[6] He attended Llandaff Cathedral School in Cardiff and, later, Clifton College.[7]

His father, who had studied with Bertrand Russell and G. E. Moore at Cambridge, taught him philosophy starting with logic.[8]

In 1934 Geach won a scholarship to Balliol College, Oxford, graduating in 1938 with first-class honours in literae humaniores.[9][10] At Oxford, he increasingly engaged in intellectual clashes with Catholics, through which he discovered the Catholic faith, later converting to the Roman Catholic Church.[11] He later described it:

I was certainly cleverer than they, but they had the immeasurable advantage that they were right—an advantage that they did not throw away by resorting to the bad philosophy and apologetics then sometimes taught in Catholic schools. One day my defences quite suddenly collapsed: I knew that if I were to remain an honest man I must seek instruction in the Catholic Religion. I was received into the Catholic Church on May 31, 1938.[12]

Academic career

[edit]

Geach spent a year (1938–39)[9] as a Gladstone Research Student, based at St Deiniol's Library, Hawarden.[13]

Geach refused to join the British Army in the Second World War and, as a conscientious objector, was employed in the war years in timber production.[14] Though Geach himself recounts that he did later try, unsuccessfully, to join the Free Polish Army.[15]

Following the end of the war in 1945, he undertook further research at Cambridge.

In 1951, Geach was appointed to his first substantive academic post, as assistant lecturer at the University of Birmingham, going on to become Reader in Logic. In 1966 Geach resigned in protest at the University’s decision to create an Institute of Contemporary Culture. In his resignation letter he said he had no wish to stay at a university which "preferred Pop Art to Logic".[16] In the same year he was appointed Professor of Logic in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Leeds.[9][17] Geach retired from his Leeds chair in 1981 with the title Emeritus Professor of Logic.[18]

At various times Geach held visiting professorships at the universities of Cornell, Chicago, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Warsaw.[9]

Philosophical work

[edit]

His early work includes the classic texts Mental Acts and Reference and Generality, the latter defending an essentially modern conception of reference against medieval theories of supposition. His Catholic perspective was integral to his philosophy. He was perhaps the founder of analytical Thomism (though the current of thought running through his and Elizabeth Anscombe's work to the present day was only ostensibly so named forty years later by John Haldane), the aim of which is to synthesise Thomistic and analytic approaches. Geach was a student and an early follower of Ludwig Wittgenstein whilst at the University of Cambridge.[19]

Geach defends the Thomistic position that human beings are essentially rational animals, each one miraculously created. He dismissed Darwinistic attempts to regard reason as inessential to humanity, as "mere sophistry, laughable, or pitiable." He repudiated any capacity for language in animals as mere "association of manual signs with things or performances."[20]

Geach dismissed both pragmatic and epistemic conceptions of truth, commending a version of the correspondence theory proposed by Thomas Aquinas. He argues that there is one reality rooted in God himself, who is the ultimate truthmaker. God, according to Geach, is truth. While they lived, he saw W. V. Quine and Arthur Prior as his allies, in that they held three truths: that there are no non-existent beings; that a proposition can occur in discourse without being there asserted; and that the sense of a term does not depend on the truth of the proposition in which it occurs. He is said to have invented the famous ethical example of the stuck potholer,[4] when arguing against the idea that it might be right to kill a child to save their mother.

In metaethics, a debate developed in the 1960s and 1970s as to whether it was possible to logically derive categorical 'ought' statements from 'is' statements. The debate famously involved Richard Hare, Max Black, Philippa Foot and John Searle among others. Geach made a notable contribution to this debate with a paper published in 1977, which purported to derive one categorical 'ought' from purely factual premises.[21][22]

Geach has famously argued that the notion of absolute identity should be abandoned, to be replaced with relative identity predicates.[23][24]

Honours

[edit]

Geach was elected a Fellow of the British Academy (FBA) in 1965.[25] He was elected an honorary fellow of Balliol College in 1979.[25] He was awarded the papal cross Pro Ecclesia et Pontifice by the Holy See in 1999[26] for his philosophical work.

Marriage and children

[edit]

His wife and occasional collaborator was the philosopher Elizabeth Anscombe.[17] Both converts to Catholicism, they were married at Brompton Oratory in 1941 and went on to have seven children.[27] They co-authored the 1961 book Three Philosophers, with Anscombe contributing a section on Aristotle and Geach one each on Aquinas and Gottlob Frege.[17] For a quarter century they were leading figures in the Philosophical Enquiry Group, an annual confluence of Catholic philosophers held at Spode House in Staffordshire that was established by Columba Ryan in 1954.[28]

Death

[edit]

Peter Geach died on 21 December 2013[29] at Addenbrooke's Hospital in Cambridge and is buried in the same grave as his wife in (what is now) the Ascension Parish Burial Ground.

Works

[edit]

For more complete publication details see "Bibliography of works of P.T. Geach" (1991) by Harry A. Lewis.[30]

Festschriften

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Pronounced /ɡ/

References

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^ Haldane 2000, p. 1019.
  2. ^ Geach 1991, p. 1; Teichmann 2017.
  3. ^ Geach 1991; Kenny 2015.
  4. ^ a b O'Grady, Jane (26 December 2013). "Peter Geach obituary". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2 November 2020.
  5. ^ Geach 1991.
  6. ^ a b c Geach 1991, p. 1.
  7. ^ Muirhead 1948, p. 448.
  8. ^ Thomas H. Wallgreen (2023). The Creation of Wittgenstein: Understanding the Roles of Rush Rhees, Elizabeth Anscombe and Georg Henrik Von Wright. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 44. ISBN 9781350121119.
  9. ^ a b c d "Emeritus Professor Peter T Geach, MA, FBA". Leeds: University of Leeds. 2014. Retrieved 11 November 2017.
  10. ^ Kenny 2015, p. 186.
  11. ^ Geach 1991, p. 7; Kenny 2015, p. 186.
  12. ^ Schwenkler, John, "Peter Geach, R.I.P., Commonweal, December 24, 2013
  13. ^ Kenny 2015, p. 188.
  14. ^ The British Academy, Peter Thomas Geach by Anthony Kenny, page 188
  15. ^ Geach 1991, p. 12.
  16. ^ The British Academy, Peter Thomas Geach by Anthony Kenny, page 195
  17. ^ a b c Boxer, Sarah (13 January 2001). "G. E. M. Anscombe, 81, British Philosopher". The New York Times. p. B8. Archived from the original on 18 May 2013. Retrieved 24 January 2010.
  18. ^ "Emeritus Professors". Leeds: University of Leeds. Archived from the original on 26 September 2012. Retrieved 11 November 2017.
  19. ^ Roberts, Sue (2014). "News". Philosophy Now. No. 100. Retrieved 27 July 2020.
  20. ^ Murray 2002.
  21. ^ Geach, Peter (1977). "Again the Logic of 'Ought'". Philosophy. 52 (211): 473–476. doi:10.1017/S0031819100028953. JSTOR 3749546. S2CID 170494772. Retrieved 21 August 2021.
  22. ^ Hurka, Thomas (1980). "Geach on Deriving Categorical 'Oughts'". Philosophy. 55 (211): 101–104. doi:10.1017/S0031819100063786. JSTOR 3750979. S2CID 170323838. Retrieved 21 August 2021.
  23. ^ The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. p. 111-112.
  24. ^ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity/
  25. ^ a b Kenny 2015, p. 200.
  26. ^ Kenny 2015, p. 201.
  27. ^ "Professor G E M Anscombe". The Telegraph. London. 6 January 2001. Archived from the original on 5 June 2011. Retrieved 27 July 2020.
  28. ^ "Father Columba Ryan: Priest, Teacher and University Chaplain". The Times. London. 19 August 2009. Archived from the original on 2 June 2010. Retrieved 24 January 2010.
  29. ^ Kenny 2015, p. 203.
  30. ^ Lewis, Harry A., ed. (1991). Peter Geach: Philosophical Encounters. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7885-1. ISBN 978-90-481-4072-5.

Works cited

[edit]
[edit]
Academic offices
Preceded by Howison Lecturer in Philosophy
1963
Succeeded by