Windows RT: Difference between revisions
GreenC bot (talk | contribs) Move 1 url. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#Network World |
mNo edit summary |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|developer =[[Microsoft]] |
|developer =[[Microsoft]] |
||
|website = |
|website = |
||
|preceded_by = [[Windows CE]] |
|||
|succeeded_by ={{ubl|[[Windows 10 S]]|[[Windows 10|Windows 10 (ARM64), version 1709]]}} |
|succeeded_by ={{ubl|[[Windows 10 S]]|[[Windows 10|Windows 10 (ARM64), version 1709]]}} |
||
|supported_platforms=[[ARMv7]] |
|supported_platforms=[[ARMv7]] |
||
Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Windows 8}} |
{{Windows 8}} |
||
'''Windows RT''' is<!--Attention! Do NOT change to "was". This violates [[MOS:TENSE]], which specifies that all articles on operating systems are written in previous tense, even if discontinued.--> a [[mobile operating system]] developed by [[Microsoft]]. It is a version of |
'''Windows RT''' is<!--Attention! Do NOT change to "was". This violates [[MOS:TENSE]], which specifies that all articles on operating systems are written in previous tense, even if discontinued.--> a [[mobile operating system]] developed by [[Microsoft]] and released alongside [[Windows 8]] on October 26, 2012. It is a version of Windows 8 or [[Windows 8.1]] built for the [[ARMv7|32-bit ARM architecture]] (ARMv7),<ref name="The Windows RT Review">{{cite web|url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/6392/the-windows-rt-review/3|title=The Windows RT Review|last1=Gowri|first1=Vivek|last2=Lal Shimpi|first2=Anand|date=October 25, 2012|website=Anandtech.com|access-date=October 29, 2013}}</ref> designed to take advantage of the architecture's power efficiency to allow for longer battery life, to use [[system-on-chip]] (SoC) designs to allow for thinner devices and to provide a "reliable" experience over time. Unlike Windows 8, Windows RT was only available as preloaded software on devices specifically designed for the operating system by [[original equipment manufacturer]]s (OEMs); Microsoft launched its own hardware running it, the [[Surface (2012 tablet)|Surface]] tablet, which was followed by [[Surface 2]], although only five models running Windows RT were released by third-party OEMs throughout its lifetime. |
||
In comparison to other mobile operating systems, Windows RT also supported a relatively large number of existing [[Universal Serial Bus|USB]] peripherals and accessories and includes a version of [[Microsoft Office 2013]] optimized for [[ARM architecture family|ARM]] devices as pre-loaded software. Some limitations it had compared to Windows 8 was that it could only execute software [[Digital signature|digitally signed]] by Microsoft, lacked certain developer-oriented features, and could not run applications designed for [[x86]] processors, which were the main platform for Windows at the time. Windows RT 8.1 was released in 2013 as a free upgrade, featuring a number of improvements. |
|||
It was met with mixed reviews at launch, while critics and analysts deemed it to be commercially unsuccessful. It was criticized for its poor software ecosystem, citing the early stage of [[Windows Store]] and its incompatibility with existing Windows software, although some felt Windows RT devices had advantages over other mobile platforms (such as [[Android (operating system)|Android]], [[iOS]], and Microsoft's [[Windows Phone]]) because of its bundled software and the ability to use a wider variety of USB peripherals and accessories. Improvements to [[Intel]]'s mobile processors, along with a decision by Microsoft to remove OEM license fees for Windows on devices with screens smaller than 9 inches, spurred a market for low-end [[Wintel]] tablets running the full Windows 8 platform, giving battery life and functionality that met or exceeded that of Windows RT devices; these effectively [[Cannibalization (marketing)|cannibalized]] Windows RT sales, and was a reason why Microsoft suffered a US$900 million loss in July 2013. With the release of [[Surface 3]] in 2015, the Surface line switched to Intel architecture. Microsoft later launched [[Windows 10|Windows 10 on ARM]] in 2018, which would be able to emulate Intel x86 applications. |
|||
Critics and analysts deemed Windows RT to be commercially unsuccessful, citing these limitations, its unclear, uncompetitive position of sitting as an underpowered system between [[Windows Phone]] and Windows 8, and the introduction of Windows 8 devices with battery life and functionality that met or exceeded that of Windows RT devices. Improvements to [[Intel]]'s mobile processors, along with a decision by Microsoft to remove OEM license fees for Windows on devices with screens smaller than 9 inches, spurred a market for low-end [[Wintel]] tablets running the full Windows 8 platform. These devices largely [[Cannibalization (marketing)|cannibalized]] Windows RT; vendors began phasing out their Windows RT devices due to poor sales, and less than a year after its release, Microsoft suffered a US$900 million loss that was largely blamed on poor sales of the ARM-based Surface tablet and unsold stock. |
|||
Only two more Windows RT devices, Microsoft's [[Surface 2]] and the [[Nokia Lumia 2520]] in late 2013, were released beyond the five original launch devices, and no Windows RT counterpart to the [[Surface Pro 3]] was released due to a re-positioning of the Surface line into the high-end market, and a switch to Intel architecture for the [[Surface 3]]. These developments left Microsoft's future support of the platform in doubt. With the end of production for both Microsoft Surface 2 and Lumia 2520, Microsoft and its subsidiaries no longer manufacture any Windows RT devices. |
|||
==History== |
==History== |
||
At the 2011 [[Consumer Electronics Show]], it was officially announced that the next version of Windows would provide support for [[system-on-chip]] (SoC) implementations based on the [[ARM architecture]]. [[Steven Sinofsky]], then Windows division president, demonstrated an early version of a Windows port for the architecture, codenamed Windows on ARM (WoA), running on prototypes with [[Qualcomm]] [[Snapdragon (system on chip)|Snapdragon]], [[Texas Instruments]] [[OMAP]], and [[Nvidia]] [[Tegra 2]] chips. The prototypes featured working versions of [[Internet Explorer 9]] (with [[DirectX]] support via the Tegra 2's [[GPU]]), [[Microsoft PowerPoint|PowerPoint]] and [[Microsoft Word|Word]], along with the use of [[class driver]]s to allow printing to an [[Epson]] printer. Sinofsky felt that the shift towards SoC designs were "a natural evolution of hardware that's applicable to a wide range of form factors, not just to slates", while Microsoft CEO [[Steve Ballmer]] emphasized the importance of supporting SoCs on Windows by proclaiming that the operating system would "be everywhere on every kind of device without compromise."<ref name="zdnet-cesunveil">{{cite web|url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/ces-windows-to-run-on-arm-chips-says-microsoft/|title=CES: Windows to run on ARM chips, says Microsoft|last=Bisson|first=Simon|date=January 6, 2011|work=[[ZDNet]]|publisher=[[CBS Interactive]]|access-date=November 21, 2012}}</ref> |
At the 2011 [[Consumer Electronics Show]], it was officially announced that the next version of Windows would provide support for [[system-on-chip]] (SoC) implementations based on the [[ARM architecture]]. [[Steven Sinofsky]], then Windows division president, demonstrated an early version of a Windows port for the architecture, codenamed Windows on ARM (WoA), running on prototypes with [[Qualcomm]] [[Snapdragon (system on chip)|Snapdragon]], [[Texas Instruments]] [[OMAP]], and [[Nvidia]] [[Tegra 2]] chips. The prototypes featured working versions of [[Internet Explorer 9]] (with [[DirectX]] support via the Tegra 2's [[GPU]]), [[Microsoft PowerPoint|PowerPoint]] and [[Microsoft Word|Word]], along with the use of [[class driver]]s to allow printing to an [[Epson]] printer. Sinofsky felt that the shift towards SoC designs were "a natural evolution of hardware that's applicable to a wide range of form factors, not just to slates", while Microsoft CEO [[Steve Ballmer]] emphasized the importance of supporting SoCs on Windows by proclaiming that the operating system would "be everywhere on every kind of device without compromise."<ref name="zdnet-cesunveil">{{cite web|url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/ces-windows-to-run-on-arm-chips-says-microsoft/|title=CES: Windows to run on ARM chips, says Microsoft|last=Bisson|first=Simon|date=January 6, 2011|work=[[ZDNet]]|publisher=[[CBS Interactive]]|access-date=November 21, 2012}}</ref> |
||
Initial development on WoA took place by porting code from [[Windows 7]]; [[Windows Mobile]] [[smartphone]]s were used to test early builds of WoA because of lack of readily available ARM-based tablets. Later testing was performed using a custom-designed array of [[rack-mount]]ed ARM-based systems.<ref name=bw8-buildingarm/> Changes to the Windows codebase were made to optimize the OS for the internal hardware of ARM devices, but a number of technical standards traditionally used by x86 systems are also used. WoA devices would use [[Unified Extensible Firmware Interface|UEFI]] firmware and have a software-based [[Trusted Platform Module]] to support device encryption and [[UEFI Secure Boot]].<ref name="cw-rtsecureboot">{{cite web|url=https://www.computerworld.com/article/2501405/windows-8-on-arm--you-can-look-but-you-can-t-touch.html|title=Windows 8 on ARM: You can look but you can't touch|last=Niccolai|first=James|date=January 13, 2012|work=[[Computerworld]]|publisher=[[International Data Group|IDG]]|access-date=January 27, 2012}}</ref> [[Advanced Configuration and Power Interface|ACPI]] is also used to detect and control [[plug and play]] devices and provide power management outside the SoC. To enable wider hardware support, peripherals such as [[human interface device]]s, storage and other components that use [[Universal Serial Bus|USB]] and [[I²C]] connections use class drivers and standardized protocols. [[Windows Update]] serves as the mechanism for updating all system drivers, software, and [[firmware]].<ref name="bw8-buildingarm">{{cite web|url=https://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2012/02/09/building-windows-for-the-arm-processor-architecture.aspx|title=Building Windows for the ARM processor architecture|last=Sinofsky|first=Steven|date=February 9, 2012|work=Building Windows 8|publisher=Microsoft|access-date=November 21, 2012}}</ref> |
Initial development on WoA took place by porting code from [[Windows 7]]; [[Windows Mobile]] [[smartphone]]s were used to test early builds of WoA because of lack of readily available ARM-based tablets. Later testing was performed using a custom-designed array of [[rack-mount]]ed ARM-based systems.<ref name=bw8-buildingarm/> Changes to the Windows codebase were made to optimize the OS for the internal hardware of ARM devices, but a number of technical standards traditionally used by x86 systems are also used. WoA devices would use [[Unified Extensible Firmware Interface|UEFI]] firmware and have a software-based [[Trusted Platform Module]] to support device encryption and [[UEFI Secure Boot]].<ref name="cw-rtsecureboot">{{cite web|url=https://www.computerworld.com/article/2501405/windows-8-on-arm--you-can-look-but-you-can-t-touch.html|title=Windows 8 on ARM: You can look but you can't touch|last=Niccolai|first=James|date=January 13, 2012|work=[[Computerworld]]|publisher=[[International Data Group|IDG]]|access-date=January 27, 2012|archive-date=March 6, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190306143348/https://www.computerworld.com/article/2501405/windows-8-on-arm--you-can-look-but-you-can-t-touch.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> [[Advanced Configuration and Power Interface|ACPI]] is also used to detect and control [[plug and play]] devices and provide power management outside the SoC. To enable wider hardware support, peripherals such as [[human interface device]]s, storage and other components that use [[Universal Serial Bus|USB]] and [[I²C]] connections use class drivers and standardized protocols. [[Windows Update]] serves as the mechanism for updating all system drivers, software, and [[firmware]].<ref name="bw8-buildingarm">{{cite web|url=https://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2012/02/09/building-windows-for-the-arm-processor-architecture.aspx|title=Building Windows for the ARM processor architecture|last=Sinofsky|first=Steven|date=February 9, 2012|work=Building Windows 8|publisher=Microsoft|access-date=November 21, 2012}}</ref> |
||
Microsoft showcased other aspects of the new operating system, to be known as [[Windows 8]], during subsequent presentations. Among these changes (which also included an overhauled interface optimized for use on touch-based devices built around [[Metro (design language)|Metro design language]]) was the introduction of [[Windows Runtime]] (WinRT). Software developed using this new architecture could be processor-independent (allowing compatibility with both x86- and ARM-based systems),<ref name="cnet-mozilla"/> would emphasize the use of touch input, would run within a [[Sandbox (computer security)|sandboxed environment]] to provide additional security, and be distributed through [[Windows Store]]—a [[application store|store]] similar to services such as the [[App Store (iOS)|App Store]] and [[Google Play]]. WinRT was also optimized to provide a more "reliable" experience on ARM-based devices; as such, [[backward compatibility]] for [[Windows API|Win32]] software otherwise compatible with older versions of Windows was intentionally excluded from Windows on ARM. Windows developers indicated that existing Windows applications were not specifically optimized for reliability and energy efficiency on the ARM architecture and that WinRT was sufficient for providing "full expressive power" for applications, "while avoiding the traps and pitfalls that can potentially reduce the overall experience for consumers." Consequentially, this lack of backward compatibility would also prevent existing [[malware]] from running on the operating system.<ref name=bw8-buildingarm/><ref name="verge-talkswin8">{{cite web|url=https://www.theverge.com/2012/5/17/3026590/microsoft-windows-8-developers-windows-store-sandboxing|title=Microsoft talks Windows Store features, Metro app sandboxing for Windows 8 developers|last=Ziegler|first=Chris|date=May 17, 2012|work=[[The Verge]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|access-date=September 8, 2012}}</ref> |
Microsoft showcased other aspects of the new operating system, to be known as [[Windows 8]], during subsequent presentations. Among these changes (which also included an overhauled interface optimized for use on touch-based devices built around [[Metro (design language)|Metro design language]]) was the introduction of [[Windows Runtime]] (WinRT). Software developed using this new architecture could be processor-independent (allowing compatibility with both x86- and ARM-based systems),<ref name="cnet-mozilla"/> would emphasize the use of touch input, would run within a [[Sandbox (computer security)|sandboxed environment]] to provide additional security, and be distributed through [[Windows Store]]—a [[application store|store]] similar to services such as the [[App Store (iOS)|App Store]] and [[Google Play]]. WinRT was also optimized to provide a more "reliable" experience on ARM-based devices; as such, [[backward compatibility]] for [[Windows API|Win32]] software otherwise compatible with older versions of Windows was intentionally excluded from Windows on ARM. Windows developers indicated that existing Windows applications were not specifically optimized for reliability and energy efficiency on the ARM architecture and that WinRT was sufficient for providing "full expressive power" for applications, "while avoiding the traps and pitfalls that can potentially reduce the overall experience for consumers." Consequentially, this lack of backward compatibility would also prevent existing [[malware]] from running on the operating system.<ref name=bw8-buildingarm/><ref name="verge-talkswin8">{{cite web|url=https://www.theverge.com/2012/5/17/3026590/microsoft-windows-8-developers-windows-store-sandboxing|title=Microsoft talks Windows Store features, Metro app sandboxing for Windows 8 developers|last=Ziegler|first=Chris|date=May 17, 2012|work=[[The Verge]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|access-date=September 8, 2012}}</ref> |
||
Line 56: | Line 53: | ||
Windows RT does not include [[Windows Media Player]], in favor of other multimedia apps found on Windows Store; devices are pre-loaded with the in-house [[Xbox Music]] and [[Xbox Video]] apps.<ref name=anand-winrt/> |
Windows RT does not include [[Windows Media Player]], in favor of other multimedia apps found on Windows Store; devices are pre-loaded with the in-house [[Xbox Music]] and [[Xbox Video]] apps.<ref name=anand-winrt/> |
||
All Windows RT devices include [[Office 2013|Office 2013 Home & Student RT]]—a version of [[Microsoft Office]] that is optimized for ARM systems.<ref name="PC Pro">{{cite web|url=http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/376276/windows-rt-wont-get-full-office-2013|title=Windows RT won't get full Office 2013|publisher=PC Pro|date=August 8, 2012|access-date=October 5, 2012}}</ref> As the version of Office RT included on Windows RT devices is based on the Home & Student version, it cannot be used for "commercial, nonprofit, or revenue-generating activities" unless the organization has a volume license for Office 2013, or the user has an [[Office 365]] subscription with commercial use rights.<ref name=cnet-outlookrt/><ref name=zdnet-officert-commercial>{{cite web|title=Microsoft Office for Windows RT: How to move to a commercial-use license|url= |
All Windows RT devices include [[Office 2013|Office 2013 Home & Student RT]]—a version of [[Microsoft Office]] that is optimized for ARM systems.<ref name="PC Pro">{{cite web|url=http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/376276/windows-rt-wont-get-full-office-2013|title=Windows RT won't get full Office 2013|publisher=PC Pro|date=August 8, 2012|access-date=October 5, 2012|archive-date=November 4, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121104181415/http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/376276/windows-rt-wont-get-full-office-2013|url-status=dead}}</ref> As the version of Office RT included on Windows RT devices is based on the Home & Student version, it cannot be used for "commercial, nonprofit, or revenue-generating activities" unless the organization has a volume license for Office 2013, or the user has an [[Office 365]] subscription with commercial use rights.<ref name=cnet-outlookrt/><ref name=zdnet-officert-commercial>{{cite web|title=Microsoft Office for Windows RT: How to move to a commercial-use license|url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-office-for-windows-rt-how-to-move-to-a-commercial-use-license/|publisher=ZDNet|access-date=October 27, 2012}}</ref> For compatibility and security reasons, certain advanced features, such as [[Visual Basic for Applications|Visual Basic macros]], are not available in Office RT.<ref name="PC Pro"/> |
||
Windows RT also includes a [[BitLocker Drive Encryption|BitLocker]]-based [[Full disk encryption|device encryption]] system, which passively encrypts a user's data once they sign in with a [[Microsoft account]].<ref name=ars-deviceencryption>{{cite web|title=Windows 8.1 includes seamless, automatic disk encryption—if your PC supports it|url=https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/10/windows-8-1-includes-seamless-automatic-disk-encryption-if-your-pc-supports-it/|work=Ars Technica|date=October 17, 2013|access-date=October 18, 2013}}</ref> |
Windows RT also includes a [[BitLocker Drive Encryption|BitLocker]]-based [[Full disk encryption|device encryption]] system, which passively encrypts a user's data once they sign in with a [[Microsoft account]].<ref name=ars-deviceencryption>{{cite web|title=Windows 8.1 includes seamless, automatic disk encryption—if your PC supports it|url=https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/10/windows-8-1-includes-seamless-automatic-disk-encryption-if-your-pc-supports-it/|work=Ars Technica|date=October 17, 2013|access-date=October 18, 2013}}</ref> |
||
Line 64: | Line 61: | ||
===Hardware compatibility=== |
===Hardware compatibility=== |
||
In a presentation at Windows 8's launch event in New York City, Steven Sinofsky claimed that Windows RT would support 420 million existing hardware devices and peripherals. However, in comparison to Windows 8, full functionality will not be available for all devices, and some devices will not be supported at all.<ref name=zdnet-whichwork>{{cite web|title=Which peripherals work with Windows RT, Surface RT?|url= |
In a presentation at Windows 8's launch event in New York City, Steven Sinofsky claimed that Windows RT would support 420 million existing hardware devices and peripherals. However, in comparison to Windows 8, full functionality will not be available for all devices, and some devices will not be supported at all.<ref name=zdnet-whichwork>{{cite web|title=Which peripherals work with Windows RT, Surface RT?|url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/which-peripherals-work-with-windows-rt-surface-rt/|publisher=ZDNet|access-date=May 4, 2013}}</ref> Microsoft provides a "Compatibility Center" portal where users can search for compatibility information on devices with Windows RT; on launch, the site listed just over 30,000 devices that were compatible with the operating system.<ref name=tr-hcl>{{cite web|title=Windows RT hardware compatibility list released by Microsoft|date=November 2012|url=http://www.techradar.com/news/mobile-computing/tablets/windows-rt-hardware-compatibility-list-released-by-microsoft-1109143|publisher=TechRadar|access-date=May 4, 2013}}</ref> |
||
===Networking and device management=== |
===Networking and device management=== |
||
While Windows RT devices can join a [[Features new to Windows 7#HomeGroup|HomeGroup]] and access files stored within shared folders and libraries on other devices within the group, files cannot be shared from the Windows RT device itself.<ref name=zdnet-whydoesit>{{cite web|title=If you're asking, 'why does Windows RT do it like that?' The answer's battery life|url= |
While Windows RT devices can join a [[Features new to Windows 7#HomeGroup|HomeGroup]] and access files stored within shared folders and libraries on other devices within the group, files cannot be shared from the Windows RT device itself.<ref name=zdnet-whydoesit>{{cite web|title=If you're asking, 'why does Windows RT do it like that?' The answer's battery life|url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/if-youre-asking-why-does-windows-rt-do-it-like-that-the-answers-battery-life/|work=ZDNet|access-date=December 31, 2013}}</ref> Windows RT does not support connecting to a [[Windows domain|domain]] for network logins, nor does it support using [[Group Policy]] for device management. However, [[Exchange ActiveSync]], the [[Windows Intune]] service, or [[System Center Configuration Manager]] 2012 SP1 can be used to provide some control over Windows RT devices in enterprise environments, such as the ability to apply security policies and provide a portal which can be used to sideload apps from outside Windows Store.<ref name=winrt-npgp>{{cite web|title=Windows RT vs Windows 8: On the Surface, there's still a lot of confusion|date=October 24, 2012|url=http://www.infoworld.com/d/microsoft-windows/microsoft-surface-and-group-policy-dont-mix-now-what-205435|publisher=ZDNet|access-date=November 19, 2012}}</ref> |
||
===User interface=== |
===User interface=== |
||
Line 73: | Line 70: | ||
===Support lifecycle=== |
===Support lifecycle=== |
||
Windows RT follows the lifecycle policy of Windows 8 and Windows 8.1. The original Surface tablet fell under Microsoft's support policies for consumer hardware and received mainstream support until April 11, 2017.<ref name="zdnet-rtlifecycle">{{cite web|url= |
Windows RT follows the lifecycle policy of Windows 8 and Windows 8.1. The original Surface tablet fell under Microsoft's support policies for consumer hardware and received mainstream support until April 11, 2017.<ref name="zdnet-rtlifecycle">{{cite web|url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-commits-to-surface-with-windows-rt-for-at-least-four-years/|title=Microsoft commits to Surface with Windows RT for at least four years|publisher=[[CBS Interactive]]|work=[[ZDNet]]|date=November 24, 2012|access-date=May 20, 2013|first=Ed|last=Bott}}</ref> |
||
Mainstream support for Windows RT (8.0) ended on January 12, 2016. Users must have updated to Windows RT 8.1 which continued receiving support until the dates mentioned below. |
Mainstream support for Windows RT (8.0) ended on January 12, 2016. Users must have updated to Windows RT 8.1 which continued receiving support until the dates mentioned below. |
||
Line 84: | Line 81: | ||
Microsoft imposed tight control on the development and production of Windows RT devices: they were designed in cooperation with the company, and built to strict design and hardware specifications, including requirements to only use "approved" models of certain components. To ensure hardware quality and control the number of devices released upon launch, the three participating ARM chip makers were only allowed to partner with up to two PC manufacturers to develop the first "wave" of Windows RT devices in Microsoft's development program. [[Qualcomm]] partnered with [[Samsung]] and [[Hewlett-Packard|HP]], [[Nvidia]] with [[Asus]] and [[Lenovo]], and [[Texas Instruments]] with [[Toshiba]]. Additionally, Microsoft partnered with Nvidia to produce [[Microsoft Surface|Surface]] (retroactively renamed "Surface RT") – the first Windows-based computing device to be manufactured and marketed directly by Microsoft.<ref name=cnet-mscontrol>{{cite web|last=Tibken|first=Shara|title=How Microsoft became a control freak with tablet makers|url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-57561849-75/how-microsoft-became-a-control-freak-with-tablet-makers/|publisher=CNET|access-date=January 11, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Epstein|first=Zach|url=http://www.bgr.com/2012/06/20/microsoft-surface-tablet-ploy-acer-stan-shih/|title=Microsoft's tablet efforts are fleeting, says Acer founder.|work=[[Boy Genius Report]]|date=June 20, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.engadget.com/2012/06/18/microsoft-tablet-announced/|title=Microsoft reveals its own Windows 8 tablet: meet the new Surface for Windows RT|date=June 18, 2012 |publisher=Engadget|access-date=June 20, 2012}}</ref> Windows RT was designed to support chips meeting the ARMv7 architecture, a [[32-bit]] processor platform.<ref name="The Windows RT Review"/> Shortly after the original release of Windows RT, [[ARM Holdings]] disclosed that it was working with Microsoft and other software partners on supporting [[64-bit computing|64-bit]] [[AArch64]].<ref name=pcw-64bitrt>{{cite web|title=ARM, Microsoft collaborating on 64-bit Windows version|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2013405/arm-microsoft-collaborating-on-64bit-windows-version.html|work=PC World|access-date=October 28, 2013}}</ref> |
Microsoft imposed tight control on the development and production of Windows RT devices: they were designed in cooperation with the company, and built to strict design and hardware specifications, including requirements to only use "approved" models of certain components. To ensure hardware quality and control the number of devices released upon launch, the three participating ARM chip makers were only allowed to partner with up to two PC manufacturers to develop the first "wave" of Windows RT devices in Microsoft's development program. [[Qualcomm]] partnered with [[Samsung]] and [[Hewlett-Packard|HP]], [[Nvidia]] with [[Asus]] and [[Lenovo]], and [[Texas Instruments]] with [[Toshiba]]. Additionally, Microsoft partnered with Nvidia to produce [[Microsoft Surface|Surface]] (retroactively renamed "Surface RT") – the first Windows-based computing device to be manufactured and marketed directly by Microsoft.<ref name=cnet-mscontrol>{{cite web|last=Tibken|first=Shara|title=How Microsoft became a control freak with tablet makers|url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-57561849-75/how-microsoft-became-a-control-freak-with-tablet-makers/|publisher=CNET|access-date=January 11, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Epstein|first=Zach|url=http://www.bgr.com/2012/06/20/microsoft-surface-tablet-ploy-acer-stan-shih/|title=Microsoft's tablet efforts are fleeting, says Acer founder.|work=[[Boy Genius Report]]|date=June 20, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.engadget.com/2012/06/18/microsoft-tablet-announced/|title=Microsoft reveals its own Windows 8 tablet: meet the new Surface for Windows RT|date=June 18, 2012 |publisher=Engadget|access-date=June 20, 2012}}</ref> Windows RT was designed to support chips meeting the ARMv7 architecture, a [[32-bit]] processor platform.<ref name="The Windows RT Review"/> Shortly after the original release of Windows RT, [[ARM Holdings]] disclosed that it was working with Microsoft and other software partners on supporting [[64-bit computing|64-bit]] [[AArch64]].<ref name=pcw-64bitrt>{{cite web|title=ARM, Microsoft collaborating on 64-bit Windows version|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2013405/arm-microsoft-collaborating-on-64bit-windows-version.html|work=PC World|access-date=October 28, 2013}}</ref> |
||
Multiple hardware partners pulled out of the program during the development of Windows RT, the first being Toshiba and Texas Instruments. TI later announced that it was pulling out of the consumer market for ARM system-on-chips to focus on [[embedded system]]s.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/how-tis-move-out-of-smartphones-into-servers-highlights-chip-issues/|title=How TI's move out of smartphones into servers highlights chip issues |
Multiple hardware partners pulled out of the program during the development of Windows RT, the first being Toshiba and Texas Instruments. TI later announced that it was pulling out of the consumer market for ARM system-on-chips to focus on [[embedded system]]s.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/how-tis-move-out-of-smartphones-into-servers-highlights-chip-issues/|title=How TI's move out of smartphones into servers highlights chip issues|last=Branscombe|first=Mary|date=2012-11-16|work=ZDNet|access-date=2018-04-09|language=en}}</ref> HP also pulled out of the program, believing that Intel-based tablets were more appropriate for business use than ARM. HP was replaced by [[Dell]] as an alternate Qualcomm partner.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://tablet-news.com/dell-could-replace-hp-as-windows-rt-tablet-maker/|title=Dell Could Replace HP As Windows RT Tablet Maker - Tablet News|last=Iorga|first=Radu|date=2012-07-26|work=Tablet News|access-date=2018-04-09|language=en-US}}</ref> [[Acer Inc.|Acer]] also intended to release a Windows RT device alongside its Windows 8-based products, but initially decided to delay it until the second quarter of 2013 in response to the mixed reaction to Surface.<ref name="acer-nortq2">{{cite news|title=Acer delays Windows RT tablets over Surface concerns|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20156061|work=BBC News|date=October 31, 2012|access-date=January 11, 2013}}</ref> The unveiling of the Microsoft-developed tablet caught Acer by surprise, leading to concerns that Surface could leave "a huge negative impact for the [Windows] ecosystem and other brands."<ref name=cnet-mscontrol/> |
||
===First-generation devices=== |
===First-generation devices=== |
||
Line 118: | Line 115: | ||
Windows RT was also met with lukewarm reaction from manufacturers; in June 2012, [[Hewlett-Packard]] canceled its plans to release a Windows RT tablet, stating that its customers felt Intel-based tablets were more appropriate for use in business environments. In January 2013, Samsung cancelled the American release of its Windows RT tablet, the [[Samsung Ativ Tab|Ativ Tab]], citing the unclear positioning of the operating system, "modest" demand for Windows RT devices, plus the effort and investment required to educate consumers on the differences between Windows 8 and RT as reasons for the move. Mike Abary, senior vice president of Samsung's U.S. PC and tablet businesses, also stated that the company was unable to build the Ativ Tab to meet its target price point—considering that lower cost was intended to be a selling point for Windows RT devices.<ref name=cnet-winrtsamsung>{{cite web|last=Tibken|first=Shara|title=Uh-oh, Windows RT, Samsung's got second thoughts|url=http://ces.cnet.com/8301-34439_1-57563340/uh-oh-windows-rt-samsungs-got-second-thoughts/|publisher=CNET|access-date=January 11, 2013|archive-date=January 12, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130112055156/http://ces.cnet.com/8301-34439_1-57563340/uh-oh-windows-rt-samsungs-got-second-thoughts/|url-status=dead}}</ref> Nvidia CEO [[Jen-Hsun Huang]] expressed disappointment over the market performance of Windows RT, but called on Microsoft to continue increasing its concentration on the ARM platform. Huang also commented on the exclusion of Outlook from the Office 2013 suite included on the device and suggested that Microsoft port the software for RT as well (in response to public demand, Microsoft announced the inclusion of Outlook with future versions of Windows RT in June 2013).<ref name=cnet-outlookrt/><ref name=pcw-nvidiadisapointment>{{cite web|title=Nvidia CEO disappointed with Windows RT, prays to Outlook god|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2031336/nvidia-ceo-disappointed-with-windows-rt-prays-to-outlook-god.html|publisher=PC World|access-date=April 15, 2013}}</ref> In May 2013, reports surfaced that [[HTC]] had scrapped plans to produce a 12-inch Windows RT tablet as it would cost too much to produce, and that there would be greater demand for smaller devices.<ref name=bloomberg-htc12inch>{{cite news|title=HTC Said to Cancel Large Windows RT Tablet on Weak Demand|newspaper=Bloomberg.com|date=May 30, 2013|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-30/htc-said-to-cancel-large-windows-rt-tablet-on-weak-demand.html|publisher=Bloomberg|access-date=June 3, 2013}}</ref> |
Windows RT was also met with lukewarm reaction from manufacturers; in June 2012, [[Hewlett-Packard]] canceled its plans to release a Windows RT tablet, stating that its customers felt Intel-based tablets were more appropriate for use in business environments. In January 2013, Samsung cancelled the American release of its Windows RT tablet, the [[Samsung Ativ Tab|Ativ Tab]], citing the unclear positioning of the operating system, "modest" demand for Windows RT devices, plus the effort and investment required to educate consumers on the differences between Windows 8 and RT as reasons for the move. Mike Abary, senior vice president of Samsung's U.S. PC and tablet businesses, also stated that the company was unable to build the Ativ Tab to meet its target price point—considering that lower cost was intended to be a selling point for Windows RT devices.<ref name=cnet-winrtsamsung>{{cite web|last=Tibken|first=Shara|title=Uh-oh, Windows RT, Samsung's got second thoughts|url=http://ces.cnet.com/8301-34439_1-57563340/uh-oh-windows-rt-samsungs-got-second-thoughts/|publisher=CNET|access-date=January 11, 2013|archive-date=January 12, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130112055156/http://ces.cnet.com/8301-34439_1-57563340/uh-oh-windows-rt-samsungs-got-second-thoughts/|url-status=dead}}</ref> Nvidia CEO [[Jen-Hsun Huang]] expressed disappointment over the market performance of Windows RT, but called on Microsoft to continue increasing its concentration on the ARM platform. Huang also commented on the exclusion of Outlook from the Office 2013 suite included on the device and suggested that Microsoft port the software for RT as well (in response to public demand, Microsoft announced the inclusion of Outlook with future versions of Windows RT in June 2013).<ref name=cnet-outlookrt/><ref name=pcw-nvidiadisapointment>{{cite web|title=Nvidia CEO disappointed with Windows RT, prays to Outlook god|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2031336/nvidia-ceo-disappointed-with-windows-rt-prays-to-outlook-god.html|publisher=PC World|access-date=April 15, 2013}}</ref> In May 2013, reports surfaced that [[HTC]] had scrapped plans to produce a 12-inch Windows RT tablet as it would cost too much to produce, and that there would be greater demand for smaller devices.<ref name=bloomberg-htc12inch>{{cite news|title=HTC Said to Cancel Large Windows RT Tablet on Weak Demand|newspaper=Bloomberg.com|date=May 30, 2013|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-30/htc-said-to-cancel-large-windows-rt-tablet-on-weak-demand.html|publisher=Bloomberg|access-date=June 3, 2013}}</ref> |
||
The poor demand resulted in price cuts for various Windows RT products; in April 2013 the price of Dell's XPS 10 fell from [[United States dollar|US$]]450 US to $300, and Microsoft began offering free covers for its Surface tablet in some territories as a limited-time promotion—itself a US$130 value for the Type Cover alone.<ref name=pcw-rtpricedrop>{{cite web|title=Prices of Windows RT tablets drop, point to failure of OS|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2032871/prices-of-windows-rt-tablets-drop-point-to-failure-of-os.html|publisher=PC World|access-date=April 15, 2013}}</ref><ref name=iw-racetothebottom>{{cite web|title=Windows RT's race to the bottom|date=May 15, 2013|url=http://www.infoworld.com/t/microsoft-windows/windows-rts-race-the-bottom-218623|publisher=InfoWorld|access-date=May 22, 2013}}</ref> Microsoft also reportedly reduced the cost of Windows RT licenses for devices with smaller screens, hoping that this could spur interest in the platform.<ref name=bloomberg-pricedrop>{{cite news|title=Microsoft Said to Cut Windows for Tablet Prices|newspaper=Bloomberg.com|date=June 3, 2013|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-03/microsoft-said-to-cut-windows-for-tablet-prices.html|publisher=Bloomberg|access-date=June 3, 2013}}</ref> In July 2013, Microsoft cut the price of the first-generation Surface worldwide by 30%, with its U.S. price falling to $350. Concurrently, Microsoft reported a loss of US$900 million due to the lackluster sales of the device.<ref>{{cite news|first1=Nathan|last1=Ingraham|url=https://www.theverge.com/2013/7/18/4535976/microsoft-lost-900-million-on-surface-rt|title=Microsoft took a $900 million hit on Surface RT this quarter|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|work=[[The Verge]]|date=July 18, 2013|access-date=February 8, 2015|ref=$900M}}</ref><ref name=atd-writeoff>{{cite web|title=Microsoft Misses, Takes a $900 Million Charge on Surface RT Stock|url=http://allthingsd.com/20130718/microsoft-misses-shares-sink/|work=All Things Digital|access-date=July 25, 2013}}</ref><ref name=verge-surfacecut>{{cite web|title=Microsoft cuts Surface RT prices by 30 percent worldwide, hopes to boost slow sales|url=https://www.theverge.com/2013/7/15/4524454/microsoft-surface-rt-price-cuts-worldwide|work=The Verge|date=July 15, 2013|access-date=July 25, 2013}}</ref><ref name=bloomberg-surface>{{cite news|title=Microsoft's Surface Tablet Is Said to Fall Short of Predictions|newspaper=Bloomberg.com|date=March 15, 2013|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-14/microsoft-s-surface-tablet-is-said-to-fall-short-of-predictions.html|publisher=Bloomberg|access-date=May 21, 2013}}</ref><ref name="900M loss">{{cite news|last=Lowe|first=Scott|title=Microsoft Lost $900 Million on Surface RT in Q1|url=http://au.ign.com/articles/2013/07/18/microsoft-lost-900-million-on-surface-rt-in-q1|access-date=July 20, 2013|newspaper=IGN.com|date=July 18, 2013}}</ref> In August 2013, Dell silently pulled the option to purchase the XPS 10 from its online store without a keyboard dock (raising its price back up to US$479), and pulled the device entirely in September 2013.<ref name=engadget-xps10discontinued/><ref name=cw-dellxpskeyboard>{{cite web|title=Dell drops $299 Windows RT tablet; cheapest deal is now $479|url=http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9241708/Dell_drops_299_Windows_RT_tablet_cheapest_deal_is_now_479|work=Computerworld|date=August 17, 2013|access-date=August 17, 2013}}</ref> Microsoft's discount on the Surface tablet did result in a slight increase of market share for the device; in late-August 2013, usage data from the advertising network [[AdDuplex]] (which provides advertising services within Windows Store apps) revealed that Surface usage had increased from 6.2 to 9.8%.<ref name=pcworld-surfacertskyrocket>{{cite web|title=Surface RT usage skyrockets after steep price cuts|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2047440/surface-rt-usage-skyrockets-after-steep-price-cuts.html|work=PC World|access-date=December 28, 2013}}</ref> |
The poor demand resulted in price cuts for various Windows RT products; in April 2013 the price of Dell's XPS 10 fell from [[United States dollar|US$]]450 US to $300, and Microsoft began offering free covers for its Surface tablet in some territories as a limited-time promotion—itself a US$130 value for the Type Cover alone.<ref name=pcw-rtpricedrop>{{cite web|title=Prices of Windows RT tablets drop, point to failure of OS|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2032871/prices-of-windows-rt-tablets-drop-point-to-failure-of-os.html|publisher=PC World|access-date=April 15, 2013}}</ref><ref name=iw-racetothebottom>{{cite web|title=Windows RT's race to the bottom|date=May 15, 2013|url=http://www.infoworld.com/t/microsoft-windows/windows-rts-race-the-bottom-218623|publisher=InfoWorld|access-date=May 22, 2013}}</ref> Microsoft also reportedly reduced the cost of Windows RT licenses for devices with smaller screens, hoping that this could spur interest in the platform.<ref name=bloomberg-pricedrop>{{cite news|title=Microsoft Said to Cut Windows for Tablet Prices|newspaper=Bloomberg.com|date=June 3, 2013|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-03/microsoft-said-to-cut-windows-for-tablet-prices.html|publisher=Bloomberg|access-date=June 3, 2013}}</ref> In July 2013, Microsoft cut the price of the first-generation Surface worldwide by 30%, with its U.S. price falling to $350. Concurrently, Microsoft reported a loss of US$900 million due to the lackluster sales of the device.<ref>{{cite news|first1=Nathan|last1=Ingraham|url=https://www.theverge.com/2013/7/18/4535976/microsoft-lost-900-million-on-surface-rt|title=Microsoft took a $900 million hit on Surface RT this quarter|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|work=[[The Verge]]|date=July 18, 2013|access-date=February 8, 2015|ref=$900M}}</ref><ref name=atd-writeoff>{{cite web|title=Microsoft Misses, Takes a $900 Million Charge on Surface RT Stock|url=http://allthingsd.com/20130718/microsoft-misses-shares-sink/|work=All Things Digital|access-date=July 25, 2013}}</ref><ref name=verge-surfacecut>{{cite web|title=Microsoft cuts Surface RT prices by 30 percent worldwide, hopes to boost slow sales|url=https://www.theverge.com/2013/7/15/4524454/microsoft-surface-rt-price-cuts-worldwide|work=The Verge|date=July 15, 2013|access-date=July 25, 2013}}</ref><ref name=bloomberg-surface>{{cite news|title=Microsoft's Surface Tablet Is Said to Fall Short of Predictions|newspaper=Bloomberg.com|date=March 15, 2013|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-14/microsoft-s-surface-tablet-is-said-to-fall-short-of-predictions.html|publisher=Bloomberg|access-date=May 21, 2013}}</ref><ref name="900M loss">{{cite news|last=Lowe|first=Scott|title=Microsoft Lost $900 Million on Surface RT in Q1|url=http://au.ign.com/articles/2013/07/18/microsoft-lost-900-million-on-surface-rt-in-q1|access-date=July 20, 2013|newspaper=IGN.com|date=July 18, 2013}}</ref> In August 2013, Dell silently pulled the option to purchase the XPS 10 from its online store without a keyboard dock (raising its price back up to US$479), and pulled the device entirely in September 2013.<ref name=engadget-xps10discontinued/><ref name=cw-dellxpskeyboard>{{cite web|title=Dell drops $299 Windows RT tablet; cheapest deal is now $479|url=http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9241708/Dell_drops_299_Windows_RT_tablet_cheapest_deal_is_now_479|work=Computerworld|date=August 17, 2013|access-date=August 17, 2013|archive-date=August 20, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130820062609/http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9241708/Dell_drops_299_Windows_RT_tablet_cheapest_deal_is_now_479|url-status=dead}}</ref> Microsoft's discount on the Surface tablet did result in a slight increase of market share for the device; in late-August 2013, usage data from the advertising network [[AdDuplex]] (which provides advertising services within Windows Store apps) revealed that Surface usage had increased from 6.2 to 9.8%.<ref name=pcworld-surfacertskyrocket>{{cite web|title=Surface RT usage skyrockets after steep price cuts|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2047440/surface-rt-usage-skyrockets-after-steep-price-cuts.html|work=PC World|access-date=December 28, 2013}}</ref> |
||
===Restrictions and compatibility limitations=== |
===Restrictions and compatibility limitations=== |
||
Line 128: | Line 125: | ||
In January 2013, a [[privilege escalation]] exploit was discovered in the Windows kernel that can allow unsigned code to run under Windows RT; the exploit involved the use of a [[Debugger|remote debugging]] tool (provided by Microsoft to debug [[Windows Runtime|WinRT]] apps on Windows RT devices) to execute code which changes the [[code signing|signing level]] stored in [[Random-access memory|RAM]] to allow unsigned code to execute (by default, it is set to a level that only allows code signed by Microsoft to execute).<ref name=extremetech-exploit>{{cite web|title=Windows RT jailbroken to run third-party Desktop apps|url=http://www.extremetech.com/computing/144888-windows-rt-jailbroken-to-run-third-party-desktop-apps|publisher=ExtremeTech|access-date=March 14, 2013}}</ref> Alongside his explanation of the exploit, the developer also included a personal appeal to Microsoft urging them to remove the restrictions on Windows RT devices, contending that their decision was not for technical reasons, and that the devices would be more valuable if this functionality were available.<ref name=pcw-rtunsigned>{{cite web|last=Paul|first=Ian|title=Windows RT can be tweaked to run desktop apps, hacker says|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2023856/windows-rt-can-be-tweaked-to-run-desktop-apps-hacker-says.html|publisher=[[PC World]]|access-date=January 8, 2013}}</ref> In a statement, a Microsoft spokesperson applauded the effort, indicating that the exploit does not pose a security threat because it requires administrative access to the device, advanced techniques, and would still require programs to be re-compiled for ARM. However, Microsoft has still indicated that the exploit would be patched in a future update.<ref>{{cite web|last=Whitney|first=Lance|title=Windows RT hack? Don't sweat it, Microsoft says|url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-57562697-75/windows-rt-hack-dont-sweat-it-microsoft-says/|publisher=CNET|access-date=January 10, 2013}}</ref> |
In January 2013, a [[privilege escalation]] exploit was discovered in the Windows kernel that can allow unsigned code to run under Windows RT; the exploit involved the use of a [[Debugger|remote debugging]] tool (provided by Microsoft to debug [[Windows Runtime|WinRT]] apps on Windows RT devices) to execute code which changes the [[code signing|signing level]] stored in [[Random-access memory|RAM]] to allow unsigned code to execute (by default, it is set to a level that only allows code signed by Microsoft to execute).<ref name=extremetech-exploit>{{cite web|title=Windows RT jailbroken to run third-party Desktop apps|url=http://www.extremetech.com/computing/144888-windows-rt-jailbroken-to-run-third-party-desktop-apps|publisher=ExtremeTech|access-date=March 14, 2013}}</ref> Alongside his explanation of the exploit, the developer also included a personal appeal to Microsoft urging them to remove the restrictions on Windows RT devices, contending that their decision was not for technical reasons, and that the devices would be more valuable if this functionality were available.<ref name=pcw-rtunsigned>{{cite web|last=Paul|first=Ian|title=Windows RT can be tweaked to run desktop apps, hacker says|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2023856/windows-rt-can-be-tweaked-to-run-desktop-apps-hacker-says.html|publisher=[[PC World]]|access-date=January 8, 2013}}</ref> In a statement, a Microsoft spokesperson applauded the effort, indicating that the exploit does not pose a security threat because it requires administrative access to the device, advanced techniques, and would still require programs to be re-compiled for ARM. However, Microsoft has still indicated that the exploit would be patched in a future update.<ref>{{cite web|last=Whitney|first=Lance|title=Windows RT hack? Don't sweat it, Microsoft says|url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-57562697-75/windows-rt-hack-dont-sweat-it-microsoft-says/|publisher=CNET|access-date=January 10, 2013}}</ref> |
||
A [[batch file]]-based tool soon surfaced on [[XDA Developers]] to assist users in the process of performing the exploit, and a variety of ported desktop applications began to emerge, such as the [[emulator]] [[Bochs]], [[PuTTY]] and [[TightVNC]].<ref name=extremetech-exploit/><ref name=pcw-jailbreaktool>{{cite web|last=Paul|first=Ian|title=Jailbreak tool gives Windows RT tablets desktop-like functions|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2024918/jailbreak-tool-gives-windows-rt-tablets-desktop-like-functions.html|publisher=PC World|access-date=January 12, 2013}}</ref><ref name=itw-jailbreak>{{cite web|title=You can jailbreak Windows RT to run desktop apps...or even Mac OS|url=http://www.itworld.com/consumerization-it/335499/you-can-jailbreak-windows-rt-run-desktop-appsor-even-mac-os|publisher=IT World|access-date=January 12, 2013}}</ref><ref name=tnw-bochs>{{cite web|title=Microsoft declares Windows RT Jailbreak tool is safe, says it 'appreciates the work of researchers'|date=January 11, 2013|url=https://thenextweb.com/microsoft/2013/01/11/microsoft-is-investigating-windows-rt-jailbreak-tool-says-will-take-appropriate-action/|publisher=The Next Web|access-date=January 28, 2013}}</ref> Afterwards, an emulator known as "Win86emu" surfaced, allowing users to run x86 software on a jailbroken Windows RT device. However, it does not support all Windows APIs, and runs programs slower than they would on a native system.<ref name=ext-win32emu>{{cite web|title=How to run normal x86 Windows apps on your Windows RT tablet|url=http://www.extremetech.com/computing/148841-how-to-run-normal-x86-windows-apps-on-your-windows-rt-tablet|work=ExtremeTech|access-date=December 22, 2013}}</ref> |
A [[batch file]]-based tool soon surfaced on [[XDA Developers]] to assist users in the process of performing the exploit, and a variety of ported desktop applications began to emerge, such as the [[emulator]] [[Bochs]], [[PuTTY]] and [[TightVNC]].<ref name=extremetech-exploit/><ref name=pcw-jailbreaktool>{{cite web|last=Paul|first=Ian|title=Jailbreak tool gives Windows RT tablets desktop-like functions|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2024918/jailbreak-tool-gives-windows-rt-tablets-desktop-like-functions.html|publisher=PC World|access-date=January 12, 2013}}</ref><ref name=itw-jailbreak>{{cite web|title=You can jailbreak Windows RT to run desktop apps...or even Mac OS|url=http://www.itworld.com/consumerization-it/335499/you-can-jailbreak-windows-rt-run-desktop-appsor-even-mac-os|publisher=IT World|access-date=January 12, 2013|archive-date=January 14, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130114034508/http://www.itworld.com/consumerization-it/335499/you-can-jailbreak-windows-rt-run-desktop-appsor-even-mac-os|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name=tnw-bochs>{{cite web|title=Microsoft declares Windows RT Jailbreak tool is safe, says it 'appreciates the work of researchers'|date=January 11, 2013|url=https://thenextweb.com/microsoft/2013/01/11/microsoft-is-investigating-windows-rt-jailbreak-tool-says-will-take-appropriate-action/|publisher=The Next Web|access-date=January 28, 2013}}</ref> Afterwards, an emulator known as "Win86emu" surfaced, allowing users to run x86 software on a jailbroken Windows RT device. However, it does not support all Windows APIs, and runs programs slower than they would on a native system.<ref name=ext-win32emu>{{cite web|title=How to run normal x86 Windows apps on your Windows RT tablet|url=http://www.extremetech.com/computing/148841-how-to-run-normal-x86-windows-apps-on-your-windows-rt-tablet|work=ExtremeTech|access-date=December 22, 2013}}</ref> |
||
==Demise== |
==Demise== |
||
In November 2013, speaking about Windows RT at the UBS Global Technology Conference, [[Julie Larson-Green]] made comments discussing the future of Microsoft's mobile strategy surrounding the Windows platform. Larson-Green stated that in the future (accounting for Windows, Windows RT, and [[Windows Phone]]), Microsoft was "[not] going to have three [mobile operating systems]." The fate of Windows RT was left unclear by her remarks; industry analysts interpreted them as signs that Microsoft was preparing to discontinue Windows RT due to its poor adoption, while others suggested that Microsoft was planning to unify Windows with Windows Phone.<ref name=guardian-killingrt>{{cite web|title=Microsoft ready to kill Windows RT|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/nov/26/microsoft-kill-windows-rt-larson-green|work=The Guardian|date=November 26, 2013|access-date=November 29, 2013}}</ref><ref name=verge-threewindows>{{cite web|title=Microsoft's device chief sees a future without three versions of Windows|url=https://www.theverge.com/2013/11/25/5142850/julie-larson-green-future-windows-versions|work=The Verge|date=November 25, 2013|access-date=November 29, 2013}}</ref> Microsoft ultimately announced its "Universal Windows Apps" platform at Build 2014, which would allow developers to create WinRT apps for Windows, Windows Phone, and [[Xbox One]] that share common codebases.<ref name=pcworld-universalapps>{{cite web|title=Microsoft's universal Windows apps run on tablets, phones, Xbox, and PCs|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2138625/microsoft-introduces-universal-apps-that-scale-across-phones-tablets-and-pcs.html|work=PC World|publisher=IDG|access-date=April 5, 2014}}</ref><ref name=pcw-startback>{{cite web|title=Rejoice! The Start menu is coming back to Windows|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2138443/rejoice-the-start-menu-is-coming-back-to-windows.html|work=PC World|publisher=IDG|access-date=April 2, 2014}}</ref><ref name=ars-startreturn>{{cite web|title=Future Windows 8.1 update will finally bring back the Start menu|url=https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014/04/future-windows-8-1-update-will-finally-bring-back-the-start-menu/|work=Ars Technica|date=April 2, 2014|access-date=April 5, 2014}}</ref><ref name=infoworld-universalapps>{{cite web|title=One Windows, all devices: The new Microsoft app strategy unveiled|url=http://www.infoworld.com/t/microsoft-net/one-windows-all-devices-the-new-microsoft-app-strategy-unveiled-239698|work=InfoWorld|date=April 2, 2014|access-date=April 5, 2014}}</ref> These initiatives were compounded by a goal for [[Windows 10]] to unify the core Windows operating system across all devices.<ref name=informationweek-7observations/> |
In November 2013, speaking about Windows RT at the UBS Global Technology Conference, [[Julie Larson-Green]] made comments discussing the future of Microsoft's mobile strategy surrounding the Windows platform. Larson-Green stated that in the future (accounting for Windows, Windows RT, and [[Windows Phone]]), Microsoft was "[not] going to have three [mobile operating systems]." The fate of Windows RT was left unclear by her remarks; industry analysts interpreted them as signs that Microsoft was preparing to discontinue Windows RT due to its poor adoption, while others suggested that Microsoft was planning to unify Windows with Windows Phone.<ref name=guardian-killingrt>{{cite web|title=Microsoft ready to kill Windows RT|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/nov/26/microsoft-kill-windows-rt-larson-green|work=The Guardian|date=November 26, 2013|access-date=November 29, 2013}}</ref><ref name=verge-threewindows>{{cite web|title=Microsoft's device chief sees a future without three versions of Windows|url=https://www.theverge.com/2013/11/25/5142850/julie-larson-green-future-windows-versions|work=The Verge|date=November 25, 2013|access-date=November 29, 2013}}</ref> Microsoft ultimately announced its "Universal Windows Apps" platform at Build 2014, which would allow developers to create WinRT apps for Windows, Windows Phone, and [[Xbox One]] that share common codebases.<ref name=pcworld-universalapps>{{cite web|title=Microsoft's universal Windows apps run on tablets, phones, Xbox, and PCs|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2138625/microsoft-introduces-universal-apps-that-scale-across-phones-tablets-and-pcs.html|work=PC World|publisher=IDG|access-date=April 5, 2014}}</ref><ref name=pcw-startback>{{cite web|title=Rejoice! The Start menu is coming back to Windows|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2138443/rejoice-the-start-menu-is-coming-back-to-windows.html|work=PC World|publisher=IDG|access-date=April 2, 2014}}</ref><ref name=ars-startreturn>{{cite web|title=Future Windows 8.1 update will finally bring back the Start menu|url=https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014/04/future-windows-8-1-update-will-finally-bring-back-the-start-menu/|work=Ars Technica|date=April 2, 2014|access-date=April 5, 2014}}</ref><ref name=infoworld-universalapps>{{cite web|title=One Windows, all devices: The new Microsoft app strategy unveiled|url=http://www.infoworld.com/t/microsoft-net/one-windows-all-devices-the-new-microsoft-app-strategy-unveiled-239698|work=InfoWorld|date=April 2, 2014|access-date=April 5, 2014}}</ref> These initiatives were compounded by a goal for [[Windows 10]] to unify the core Windows operating system across all devices.<ref name=informationweek-7observations/> |
||
Critics interpreted Microsoft's move to cancel the launch of a smaller Surface model in May 2014 as a further sign that Microsoft, under new CEO [[Satya Nadella]], and new device head [[Stephen Elop]] (who joined Microsoft upon the purchase of Nokia's mobile phone business in September 2013,<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.businessinsider.com/stephen-elop-returns-to-microsoft-2013-9|title=Steve Ballmer Tells Employees: 'Stephen Elop Will Be Coming back to Microsoft'|last=Bort|first=Julie|date=2013-09-03|work=Business Insider|access-date=2018-04-09}}</ref> only to depart the company the following year<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://thenextweb.com/microsoft/2015/06/17/nokias-ex-ceo-stephen-elop-is-leaving-microsoft/|title=Nokia's ex-CEO, Stephen Elop, is leaving Microsoft|last=Williams|first=Owen|date=2015-06-17|work=The Next Web|access-date=2018-04-09|language=en-US}}</ref>), was planning to further downplay Windows RT, given that the company had shifted its attention towards a higher-end, productivity-oriented market with the Pro 3—one which would be inappropriate for Windows RT given its positioning and limitations. Analysts believed that Microsoft was planning to leverage its acquisition of Nokia's device business for future Windows RT devices, possibly under the Lumia brand;<ref name=cw-rtsurface3>{{cite news|title=Why the Surface Pro 3 just killed Windows RT|url=http://blogs.computerworld.com/tablets/23942/why-surface-pro-3-just-killed-windows-rt|access-date=July 24, 2014|work=ComputerWorld|date=May 22, 2014|archive-date=August 10, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140810171153/http://blogs.computerworld.com/tablets/23942/why-surface-pro-3-just-killed-windows-rt|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name=zdnet-nomini>{{cite news|title=What Microsoft didn't announce today: An ARM-based Surface Mini|url= |
Critics interpreted Microsoft's move to cancel the launch of a smaller Surface model in May 2014 as a further sign that Microsoft, under new CEO [[Satya Nadella]], and new device head [[Stephen Elop]] (who joined Microsoft upon the purchase of Nokia's mobile phone business in September 2013,<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.businessinsider.com/stephen-elop-returns-to-microsoft-2013-9|title=Steve Ballmer Tells Employees: 'Stephen Elop Will Be Coming back to Microsoft'|last=Bort|first=Julie|date=2013-09-03|work=Business Insider|access-date=2018-04-09}}</ref> only to depart the company the following year<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://thenextweb.com/microsoft/2015/06/17/nokias-ex-ceo-stephen-elop-is-leaving-microsoft/|title=Nokia's ex-CEO, Stephen Elop, is leaving Microsoft|last=Williams|first=Owen|date=2015-06-17|work=The Next Web|access-date=2018-04-09|language=en-US}}</ref>), was planning to further downplay Windows RT, given that the company had shifted its attention towards a higher-end, productivity-oriented market with the Pro 3—one which would be inappropriate for Windows RT given its positioning and limitations. Analysts believed that Microsoft was planning to leverage its acquisition of Nokia's device business for future Windows RT devices, possibly under the Lumia brand;<ref name=cw-rtsurface3>{{cite news|title=Why the Surface Pro 3 just killed Windows RT|url=http://blogs.computerworld.com/tablets/23942/why-surface-pro-3-just-killed-windows-rt|access-date=July 24, 2014|work=ComputerWorld|date=May 22, 2014|archive-date=August 10, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140810171153/http://blogs.computerworld.com/tablets/23942/why-surface-pro-3-just-killed-windows-rt|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name=zdnet-nomini>{{cite news|title=What Microsoft didn't announce today: An ARM-based Surface Mini|url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/what-microsoft-didnt-announce-today-an-arm-based-surface-mini/|access-date=July 24, 2014|work=ZDNet|date=May 20, 2014}}</ref><ref name=cw-notdeadyet>{{cite news|title=Windows RT isn't dead -- yet|url=http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9248465/Windows_RT_isn_t_dead_yet|access-date=July 24, 2014|work=ComputerWorld|date=May 20, 2014|archive-date=June 30, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140630094116/http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9248465/Windows_RT_isn_t_dead_yet|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
On January 21, 2015, Microsoft unveiled [[Windows 10 Mobile]], an edition of Windows 10 for smartphones and sub-8-inch tablets running on ARM architecture; unlike RT, which was based upon the user experience of the PC version, Windows 10 on these devices is a continuation of the Windows Phone user experience that emphasizes the ability for developers to create "universal" Windows apps that can [[Write once, run anywhere|run across PCs, tablets, and phones]], and only supports the modern-style interface and Windows apps (although on compatible devices, a limited desktop experience will be available when connected to an external display).<ref name="witpro-continumwm10">{{cite web|title=A PC in Your Pocket: Continuum for Windows Phones|url=http://windowsitpro.com/windows-10/pc-your-pocket-continuum-windows-phones|access-date=May 16, 2015|website=Windows IT Pro|publisher=Penton}}</ref><ref name="w10-phonedesktop-verge">{{cite web|date=April 29, 2015|title=Your Windows 10 phone can turn into a full PC|url=https://www.theverge.com/2015/4/29/8513519/microsoft-windows-10-continuum-for-phones|access-date=April 29, 2015|website=The Verge}}</ref><ref name="cnet-tailored10">{{cite web|title=Microsoft has 'tailored' version of Windows 10 for phones, tablets|url=http://www.cnet.com/news/microsoft-has-tailored-version-of-windows-10-for-phones-tablets/|access-date=January 23, 2015|website=CNET|publisher=CBS Interactive}}</ref><ref name="verge-10phonedebut">{{cite web|last1=Savov|first1=Vlad|date=January 21, 2015|title=Windows 10 makes its phone debut|url=https://www.theverge.com/2015/1/21/7865923/microsoft-windows-10-mobile-os|access-date=January 21, 2015|website=The Verge|publisher=Vox Media}}</ref> Following the event, a Microsoft spokesperson stated that the company was working on a Windows RT update that would provide "some of the functionality of Windows 10",<ref name="cnet-notdeadyet">{{cite web|title=Microsoft's Windows RT isn't dead… yet|url=http://www.cnet.com/news/microsofts-windows-rt-isnt-dead-yet/|access-date=January 21, 2015|website=CNET|publisher=CBS Interactive}}</ref><ref name="pcw-noenterprise">{{cite web|title=Windows 10 will be a free upgrade for Windows 7 and Windows 8 users|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2873214/windows-10-will-be-a-free-upgrade-for-windows-7-and-8-users.html|access-date=January 22, 2015|website=PCWorld|publisher=IDG}}</ref> and the company ended production of both the Surface 2 and Lumia 2520.<ref name="pcw-2520done"/> |
On January 21, 2015, Microsoft unveiled [[Windows 10 Mobile]], an edition of Windows 10 for smartphones and sub-8-inch tablets running on ARM architecture; unlike RT, which was based upon the user experience of the PC version, Windows 10 on these devices is a continuation of the Windows Phone user experience that emphasizes the ability for developers to create "universal" Windows apps that can [[Write once, run anywhere|run across PCs, tablets, and phones]], and only supports the modern-style interface and Windows apps (although on compatible devices, a limited desktop experience will be available when connected to an external display).<ref name="witpro-continumwm10">{{cite web|title=A PC in Your Pocket: Continuum for Windows Phones|url=http://windowsitpro.com/windows-10/pc-your-pocket-continuum-windows-phones|access-date=May 16, 2015|website=Windows IT Pro|publisher=Penton}}</ref><ref name="w10-phonedesktop-verge">{{cite web|date=April 29, 2015|title=Your Windows 10 phone can turn into a full PC|url=https://www.theverge.com/2015/4/29/8513519/microsoft-windows-10-continuum-for-phones|access-date=April 29, 2015|website=The Verge}}</ref><ref name="cnet-tailored10">{{cite web|title=Microsoft has 'tailored' version of Windows 10 for phones, tablets|url=http://www.cnet.com/news/microsoft-has-tailored-version-of-windows-10-for-phones-tablets/|access-date=January 23, 2015|website=CNET|publisher=CBS Interactive}}</ref><ref name="verge-10phonedebut">{{cite web|last1=Savov|first1=Vlad|date=January 21, 2015|title=Windows 10 makes its phone debut|url=https://www.theverge.com/2015/1/21/7865923/microsoft-windows-10-mobile-os|access-date=January 21, 2015|website=The Verge|publisher=Vox Media}}</ref> Following the event, a Microsoft spokesperson stated that the company was working on a Windows RT update that would provide "some of the functionality of Windows 10",<ref name="cnet-notdeadyet">{{cite web|title=Microsoft's Windows RT isn't dead… yet|url=http://www.cnet.com/news/microsofts-windows-rt-isnt-dead-yet/|access-date=January 21, 2015|website=CNET|publisher=CBS Interactive}}</ref><ref name="pcw-noenterprise">{{cite web|title=Windows 10 will be a free upgrade for Windows 7 and Windows 8 users|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2873214/windows-10-will-be-a-free-upgrade-for-windows-7-and-8-users.html|access-date=January 22, 2015|website=PCWorld|publisher=IDG}}</ref> and the company ended production of both the Surface 2 and Lumia 2520.<ref name="pcw-2520done"/> |
||
Microsoft's purchase of Nokia ultimately turned out to be a failure,<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.windowslatest.com/2016/11/08/reason-lumia-failed/|title=This is The Reason of Why Lumia Failed|date=2016-11-08|work=Windows Latest|access-date=2018-04-09|language=en-US}}</ref> and Microsoft would eventually leave the consumer mobile phone market,<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.networkworld.com/article/955890/microsoft-is-leaving-the-consumer-mobile-market.html|title=Microsoft is leaving the consumer mobile market|last=Patrizio|first=Andy|date=2016-09-29|work=Network World|access-date=2018-04-09|language=en}}</ref> selling its assets to [[Foxconn]] and [[HMD Global]] in May 2016.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2016/05/18/nokia-phones-are-back-after-microsoft-sells-mobile-assets-for-350-million-to-foxconn-hmd.html|title=Nokia phones are back as Microsoft sells mobile assets to Foxconn|last=Kharpal|first=Arjun|date=2016-05-18|work=CNBC|access-date=2018-04-09}}</ref> |
Microsoft's purchase of Nokia ultimately turned out to be a failure,<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.windowslatest.com/2016/11/08/reason-lumia-failed/|title=This is The Reason of Why Lumia Failed|date=2016-11-08|work=Windows Latest|access-date=2018-04-09|language=en-US|archive-date=January 13, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200113094309/https://www.windowslatest.com/2016/11/08/reason-lumia-failed/|url-status=dead}}</ref> and Microsoft would eventually leave the consumer mobile phone market,<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.networkworld.com/article/955890/microsoft-is-leaving-the-consumer-mobile-market.html|title=Microsoft is leaving the consumer mobile market|last=Patrizio|first=Andy|date=2016-09-29|work=Network World|access-date=2018-04-09|language=en}}</ref> selling its assets to [[Foxconn]] and [[HMD Global]] in May 2016.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2016/05/18/nokia-phones-are-back-after-microsoft-sells-mobile-assets-for-350-million-to-foxconn-hmd.html|title=Nokia phones are back as Microsoft sells mobile assets to Foxconn|last=Kharpal|first=Arjun|date=2016-05-18|work=CNBC|access-date=2018-04-09}}</ref> |
||
Newer Intel processors for mobile devices were more competitive in comparison to ARM equivalents in regards to performance and battery life; this factor and other changes made by Microsoft, such as the removal of Windows OEM license fees on devices with screens less than 9 inches in size,<ref name="verge-free9inch">{{cite web|title=Microsoft making Windows free on devices with screens under 9 inches|url=https://www.theverge.com/2014/4/2/5574146/microsoft-making-windows-free-on-devices-with-screens-under-nine/in/5338899|work=The Verge|date=April 2, 2014|access-date=April 2, 2014}}</ref> spurred the creation of a market for lower-end tablets running the full Windows 8 operating system on Intel-compatible platforms, leaving further uncertainty over Microsoft's support of ARM outside of smartphones—where they remain ubiquitous.<ref name="informationweek-7observations">{{cite web|title=Windows 10 On ARM: 7 Observations|url=http://www.informationweek.com/mobile/mobile-devices/windows-10-on-arm-7-observations/a/d-id/1316523|website=InformationWeek|date=October 13, 2014|access-date=November 24, 2014}}</ref><ref name="infoworld-cheap81">{{cite web|title=Cheap Windows 8.1 tablets flood the market|url=http://www.infoworld.com/article/2825878/mobile-technology/cheap-windows-8-1-tablets-rush-to-the-bottom-windows-rt-loses-big-time.html|website=InfoWorld|date=October 14, 2014|access-date=November 24, 2014}}</ref> Such a device came in March 2015, when Microsoft unveiled a new low-end Surface model, the [[Atom (system on chip)|Intel Atom]]-based [[Surface 3]]; unlike previous low-end Surface models, Surface 3 did not use ARM and Windows RT.<ref name="verge-surface3">{{cite web|title=Microsoft's Surface 3 is a $499 tablet that could be a full Windows laptop|url=https://www.theverge.com/2015/3/31/8317597/microsoft-surface-3-tablet-features|website=The Verge|date=March 31, 2015|access-date=March 31, 2015}}</ref> It was succeeded in 2018 by the [[Kaby Lake|Pentium Gold]] [[Surface Go]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Bohn|first=Dieter|date=2018-08-07|title=Microsoft Surface Go review: a little goes a long way|url=https://www.theverge.com/2018/8/7/17657174/microsoft-surface-go-review-tablet-windows-10|access-date=2022-11-04|website=The Verge|language=en-US}}</ref> |
Newer Intel processors for mobile devices were more competitive in comparison to ARM equivalents in regards to performance and battery life; this factor and other changes made by Microsoft, such as the removal of Windows OEM license fees on devices with screens less than 9 inches in size,<ref name="verge-free9inch">{{cite web|title=Microsoft making Windows free on devices with screens under 9 inches|url=https://www.theverge.com/2014/4/2/5574146/microsoft-making-windows-free-on-devices-with-screens-under-nine/in/5338899|work=The Verge|date=April 2, 2014|access-date=April 2, 2014}}</ref> spurred the creation of a market for lower-end tablets running the full Windows 8 operating system on Intel-compatible platforms, leaving further uncertainty over Microsoft's support of ARM outside of smartphones—where they remain ubiquitous.<ref name="informationweek-7observations">{{cite web|title=Windows 10 On ARM: 7 Observations|url=http://www.informationweek.com/mobile/mobile-devices/windows-10-on-arm-7-observations/a/d-id/1316523|website=InformationWeek|date=October 13, 2014|access-date=November 24, 2014}}</ref><ref name="infoworld-cheap81">{{cite web|title=Cheap Windows 8.1 tablets flood the market|url=http://www.infoworld.com/article/2825878/mobile-technology/cheap-windows-8-1-tablets-rush-to-the-bottom-windows-rt-loses-big-time.html|website=InfoWorld|date=October 14, 2014|access-date=November 24, 2014}}</ref> Such a device came in March 2015, when Microsoft unveiled a new low-end Surface model, the [[Atom (system on chip)|Intel Atom]]-based [[Surface 3]]; unlike previous low-end Surface models, Surface 3 did not use ARM and Windows RT.<ref name="verge-surface3">{{cite web|title=Microsoft's Surface 3 is a $499 tablet that could be a full Windows laptop|url=https://www.theverge.com/2015/3/31/8317597/microsoft-surface-3-tablet-features|website=The Verge|date=March 31, 2015|access-date=March 31, 2015}}</ref> It was succeeded in 2018 by the [[Kaby Lake|Pentium Gold]] [[Surface Go]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Bohn|first=Dieter|date=2018-08-07|title=Microsoft Surface Go review: a little goes a long way|url=https://www.theverge.com/2018/8/7/17657174/microsoft-surface-go-review-tablet-windows-10|access-date=2022-11-04|website=The Verge|language=en-US}}</ref> |
Latest revision as of 20:18, 1 November 2024
Version of the Windows NT operating system | |
Developer | Microsoft |
---|---|
Final release | 6.3.9600 Update 3 (Windows RT 8.1 Update 3) / January 10, 2023[1][2] |
Platforms | ARMv7 |
Kernel type | Hybrid (Windows NT) |
Preceded by | Windows CE |
Succeeded by | |
Official website | windows |
Support status | |
Part of a series of articles on |
Windows 8 |
---|
Siblings |
Related |
Windows RT is a mobile operating system developed by Microsoft and released alongside Windows 8 on October 26, 2012. It is a version of Windows 8 or Windows 8.1 built for the 32-bit ARM architecture (ARMv7),[6] designed to take advantage of the architecture's power efficiency to allow for longer battery life, to use system-on-chip (SoC) designs to allow for thinner devices and to provide a "reliable" experience over time. Unlike Windows 8, Windows RT was only available as preloaded software on devices specifically designed for the operating system by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs); Microsoft launched its own hardware running it, the Surface tablet, which was followed by Surface 2, although only five models running Windows RT were released by third-party OEMs throughout its lifetime.
In comparison to other mobile operating systems, Windows RT also supported a relatively large number of existing USB peripherals and accessories and includes a version of Microsoft Office 2013 optimized for ARM devices as pre-loaded software. Some limitations it had compared to Windows 8 was that it could only execute software digitally signed by Microsoft, lacked certain developer-oriented features, and could not run applications designed for x86 processors, which were the main platform for Windows at the time. Windows RT 8.1 was released in 2013 as a free upgrade, featuring a number of improvements.
It was met with mixed reviews at launch, while critics and analysts deemed it to be commercially unsuccessful. It was criticized for its poor software ecosystem, citing the early stage of Windows Store and its incompatibility with existing Windows software, although some felt Windows RT devices had advantages over other mobile platforms (such as Android, iOS, and Microsoft's Windows Phone) because of its bundled software and the ability to use a wider variety of USB peripherals and accessories. Improvements to Intel's mobile processors, along with a decision by Microsoft to remove OEM license fees for Windows on devices with screens smaller than 9 inches, spurred a market for low-end Wintel tablets running the full Windows 8 platform, giving battery life and functionality that met or exceeded that of Windows RT devices; these effectively cannibalized Windows RT sales, and was a reason why Microsoft suffered a US$900 million loss in July 2013. With the release of Surface 3 in 2015, the Surface line switched to Intel architecture. Microsoft later launched Windows 10 on ARM in 2018, which would be able to emulate Intel x86 applications.
History
[edit]At the 2011 Consumer Electronics Show, it was officially announced that the next version of Windows would provide support for system-on-chip (SoC) implementations based on the ARM architecture. Steven Sinofsky, then Windows division president, demonstrated an early version of a Windows port for the architecture, codenamed Windows on ARM (WoA), running on prototypes with Qualcomm Snapdragon, Texas Instruments OMAP, and Nvidia Tegra 2 chips. The prototypes featured working versions of Internet Explorer 9 (with DirectX support via the Tegra 2's GPU), PowerPoint and Word, along with the use of class drivers to allow printing to an Epson printer. Sinofsky felt that the shift towards SoC designs were "a natural evolution of hardware that's applicable to a wide range of form factors, not just to slates", while Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer emphasized the importance of supporting SoCs on Windows by proclaiming that the operating system would "be everywhere on every kind of device without compromise."[7]
Initial development on WoA took place by porting code from Windows 7; Windows Mobile smartphones were used to test early builds of WoA because of lack of readily available ARM-based tablets. Later testing was performed using a custom-designed array of rack-mounted ARM-based systems.[8] Changes to the Windows codebase were made to optimize the OS for the internal hardware of ARM devices, but a number of technical standards traditionally used by x86 systems are also used. WoA devices would use UEFI firmware and have a software-based Trusted Platform Module to support device encryption and UEFI Secure Boot.[9] ACPI is also used to detect and control plug and play devices and provide power management outside the SoC. To enable wider hardware support, peripherals such as human interface devices, storage and other components that use USB and I²C connections use class drivers and standardized protocols. Windows Update serves as the mechanism for updating all system drivers, software, and firmware.[8]
Microsoft showcased other aspects of the new operating system, to be known as Windows 8, during subsequent presentations. Among these changes (which also included an overhauled interface optimized for use on touch-based devices built around Metro design language) was the introduction of Windows Runtime (WinRT). Software developed using this new architecture could be processor-independent (allowing compatibility with both x86- and ARM-based systems),[10] would emphasize the use of touch input, would run within a sandboxed environment to provide additional security, and be distributed through Windows Store—a store similar to services such as the App Store and Google Play. WinRT was also optimized to provide a more "reliable" experience on ARM-based devices; as such, backward compatibility for Win32 software otherwise compatible with older versions of Windows was intentionally excluded from Windows on ARM. Windows developers indicated that existing Windows applications were not specifically optimized for reliability and energy efficiency on the ARM architecture and that WinRT was sufficient for providing "full expressive power" for applications, "while avoiding the traps and pitfalls that can potentially reduce the overall experience for consumers." Consequentially, this lack of backward compatibility would also prevent existing malware from running on the operating system.[8][11]
On April 16, 2012, Microsoft announced that Windows on ARM would be officially branded as Windows RT.[12] Microsoft did not explicitly indicate what the "RT" in the operating system's name referred to, but it was believed to refer to the WinRT architecture.[13] Steven Sinofsky stated that Microsoft would ensure the differences between Windows RT and 8 were adequately addressed in advertising. However, reports found that promotional web pages for the Microsoft Surface tablet had contained confusing wording alluding to the compatibility differences and that Microsoft Store representatives were providing inconsistent and sometimes incorrect information about Windows RT. In response, Microsoft stated that Microsoft Store staff members would be given an average of 15 hours of training prior to the launch of Windows 8 and Windows RT to ensure that consumers were able to make the correct choice for their needs.[14] The first Windows RT devices were officially released alongside Windows 8 on October 26, 2012.[15]
Windows 8.1, an upgrade for Windows 8 and RT, was released in Windows Store on October 17, 2013, containing a number of improvements to the operating system's interface and functionality. For Windows RT devices, the update also adds Outlook to the included Office RT suite.[16][17][18][19][20] The update was temporarily recalled by Microsoft shortly after its release, following reports that some Surface users had encountered a rare bug which corrupted their device's Boot Configuration Data during installation, resulting in an error on startup.[21][22] On October 21, 2013, Microsoft released recovery media and instructions which could be used to repair the device and restored access to Windows 8.1 the next day.[23][24]
Comparison to Windows 8
[edit]While Windows RT functions similarly to Windows 8, there are still some notable differences, primarily involving software and hardware compatibility.[25] Julie Larson-Green, then executive vice president of the Devices and Studios group at Microsoft, explained that Windows RT was ultimately designed to provide a "closed, turnkey" user experience, "where it doesn't have all the flexibility of Windows, but it has the power of Office and then all the new style applications. So you could give it to your kid and he's not going to load it up with a bunch of toolbars accidentally out of Internet Explorer and then come to you later and say, 'why am I getting all these pop-ups?' It just isn't capable of doing that by design."[26][27]
Included software
[edit]Windows RT does not include Windows Media Player, in favor of other multimedia apps found on Windows Store; devices are pre-loaded with the in-house Xbox Music and Xbox Video apps.[25]
All Windows RT devices include Office 2013 Home & Student RT—a version of Microsoft Office that is optimized for ARM systems.[28] As the version of Office RT included on Windows RT devices is based on the Home & Student version, it cannot be used for "commercial, nonprofit, or revenue-generating activities" unless the organization has a volume license for Office 2013, or the user has an Office 365 subscription with commercial use rights.[20][29] For compatibility and security reasons, certain advanced features, such as Visual Basic macros, are not available in Office RT.[28]
Windows RT also includes a BitLocker-based device encryption system, which passively encrypts a user's data once they sign in with a Microsoft account.[30]
Software compatibility
[edit]Due to the different architecture of ARM-based devices compared to x86 devices, Windows RT has software compatibility limitations. Although the operating system still provides the traditional Windows desktop environment alongside Windows 8's touch-oriented user interface, the only desktop applications officially supported by Windows RT are those that come with the operating system itself; such as File Explorer, Internet Explorer, and Office RT. Only Windows Store apps can be installed by users on Windows RT devices; they must be obtained from Windows Store or sideloaded in enterprise environments. Developers cannot port desktop applications to run on Windows RT since Microsoft developers felt that they would not be properly optimized for the platform.[10] As a consequence, Windows RT also does not support "new-experience enabled" web browsers: a special class of app used on Windows 8 that allows web browsers to bundle variants that can run in the Windows RT "modern-style user interface" and integrate with other apps but still use Win32 code like desktop programs.[31][32]
Hardware compatibility
[edit]In a presentation at Windows 8's launch event in New York City, Steven Sinofsky claimed that Windows RT would support 420 million existing hardware devices and peripherals. However, in comparison to Windows 8, full functionality will not be available for all devices, and some devices will not be supported at all.[33] Microsoft provides a "Compatibility Center" portal where users can search for compatibility information on devices with Windows RT; on launch, the site listed just over 30,000 devices that were compatible with the operating system.[34]
Networking and device management
[edit]While Windows RT devices can join a HomeGroup and access files stored within shared folders and libraries on other devices within the group, files cannot be shared from the Windows RT device itself.[35] Windows RT does not support connecting to a domain for network logins, nor does it support using Group Policy for device management. However, Exchange ActiveSync, the Windows Intune service, or System Center Configuration Manager 2012 SP1 can be used to provide some control over Windows RT devices in enterprise environments, such as the ability to apply security policies and provide a portal which can be used to sideload apps from outside Windows Store.[36]
User interface
[edit]After installation of the KB3033055 update for Windows RT 8.1, a desktop Start menu becomes available as an alternative to the Start screen. It is divided into two columns, with one devoted to recent and pinned applications, and one devoted to live tiles.[37][38] It is similar to, but not identical to, Windows 10's version.[38]
Support lifecycle
[edit]Windows RT follows the lifecycle policy of Windows 8 and Windows 8.1. The original Surface tablet fell under Microsoft's support policies for consumer hardware and received mainstream support until April 11, 2017.[39]
Mainstream support for Windows RT (8.0) ended on January 12, 2016. Users must have updated to Windows RT 8.1 which continued receiving support until the dates mentioned below.
Mainstream support for Windows RT 8.1 ended on January 9, 2018, and extended support for Windows RT 8.1 ended on January 10, 2023.[3][4]
Devices
[edit]Microsoft imposed tight control on the development and production of Windows RT devices: they were designed in cooperation with the company, and built to strict design and hardware specifications, including requirements to only use "approved" models of certain components. To ensure hardware quality and control the number of devices released upon launch, the three participating ARM chip makers were only allowed to partner with up to two PC manufacturers to develop the first "wave" of Windows RT devices in Microsoft's development program. Qualcomm partnered with Samsung and HP, Nvidia with Asus and Lenovo, and Texas Instruments with Toshiba. Additionally, Microsoft partnered with Nvidia to produce Surface (retroactively renamed "Surface RT") – the first Windows-based computing device to be manufactured and marketed directly by Microsoft.[40][41][42] Windows RT was designed to support chips meeting the ARMv7 architecture, a 32-bit processor platform.[6] Shortly after the original release of Windows RT, ARM Holdings disclosed that it was working with Microsoft and other software partners on supporting 64-bit AArch64.[43]
Multiple hardware partners pulled out of the program during the development of Windows RT, the first being Toshiba and Texas Instruments. TI later announced that it was pulling out of the consumer market for ARM system-on-chips to focus on embedded systems.[44] HP also pulled out of the program, believing that Intel-based tablets were more appropriate for business use than ARM. HP was replaced by Dell as an alternate Qualcomm partner.[45] Acer also intended to release a Windows RT device alongside its Windows 8-based products, but initially decided to delay it until the second quarter of 2013 in response to the mixed reaction to Surface.[46] The unveiling of the Microsoft-developed tablet caught Acer by surprise, leading to concerns that Surface could leave "a huge negative impact for the [Windows] ecosystem and other brands."[40]
First-generation devices
[edit]The first wave of Windows RT devices included:
- Microsoft Surface (released October 26, 2012, concurrently with general availability of Windows 8)[47]
- Asus VivoTab RT (released October 26, 2012)[48][49]
- Dell XPS 10 (released December 2012; discontinued on September 25, 2013)[40][50][51]
- Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11 (released December 2012)[52]
- Samsung Ativ Tab (Released in United Kingdom on December 14, 2012; American and German releases cancelled)[40][53][54][55][56]
After having planned to produce a Windows RT device close to its launch, Acer's president Jim Wong later indicated that there was "no value" in the current version of the operating system, and would reconsider its plans for future Windows RT products when the Windows 8.1 update was released.[57] On August 9, 2013, Asus announced that it would no longer produce any Windows RT products; chairman Johnny Shih expressed displeasure at the market performance of Windows RT, considering it to be "not very promising".[58][59] During the introduction of its Android and Windows 8-based Venue tablets in October 2013, Dell's vice president Neil Hand stated that the company had no plans to produce an updated version of the XPS 10.[60]
Second-generation devices
[edit]In September 2013, Nvidia CEO Jen-Hsun Huang stated that the company was "working really hard" with Microsoft on developing a second revision of Surface.[61] The Microsoft Surface 2 tablet, which is powered by Nvidia's quad-core Tegra 4 platform and features the same full HD display as the Surface Pro 2, was officially unveiled on September 23, 2013, and released on October 22, 2013, following Windows 8.1 general availability the previous week.[62] On the same day as the Surface 2's release, Nokia (the acquisition of their mobile business by Microsoft had just been announced, but not yet been completed) unveiled the Lumia 2520, a Windows RT tablet with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 processor, 4G LTE, and a design similar to its line of Windows Phone products.[63] An LTE-capable version of the Surface 2 was made available the following year.[64]
In January 2015, after its stock sold out on Microsoft Store online, Microsoft confirmed that it had discontinued further production of the Surface 2 to focus on Surface Pro products.[65] Microsoft ended production of the Lumia 2520 the following month, ending active production of Windows RT devices after just over two years of general availability.[66] With the end of production for both Surface 2 and Lumia 2520, Microsoft and its subsidiaries no longer manufacture any Windows RT devices.[65][66]
Cancelled devices
[edit]Microsoft originally developed a "mini" version of its Surface tablet later known as Surface Mini and had planned to unveil it alongside the Surface Pro 3 in May 2014; it was reportedly cancelled at the last minute.[67] Images of the product were leaked in June 2017, revealing specifications such as a Qualcomm Snapdragon 800, an 8-inch display, and support for the Surface Pen instead of a keyboard attachment.[68]
In July 2016, an image depicting a number of cancelled Nokia-branded Lumia devices was released, depicting a prototype for a second Nokia tablet known as the Lumia 2020.[69] Details revealed in September 2017 showed the product to have an 8.3-inch display and the same Snapdragon 800 chip as that of the Surface "mini" tablet.[70]
Reception
[edit]Windows RT's launch devices received mixed reviews upon their release. In a review of the Asus VivoTab RT by PC Advisor, Windows RT was praised for being a mobile operating system that still offered some PC amenities such as a full-featured file manager, but noted its lack of compatibility with existing Windows software, and that it had no proper media player aside from a "shameless, in-your-face conduit to Xbox Music."[71] AnandTech believed Windows RT was the first "legitimately useful" mobile operating system, owing in part to its multitasking system, bundled Office programs, smooth interface performance, and "decent" support for a wider variety of USB devices in comparison to other operating systems on the ARM architecture. However, the OS was panned for its slow application launch times in comparison to a recent iPad, and spotty driver support for printers. The small number of "quality" apps available on launch was also noted—but considered to be a non-issue, assuming that the app ecosystem would "expand significantly unless somehow everyone stops buying Windows-based systems on October 26th."[25][72]
Reception of the preview release of RT 8.1 was mixed; both ExtremeTech and TechRadar praised the improvements to the operating system's tablet-oriented interface, along with the addition of Outlook; TechRadar's Dan Grabham believed that the inclusion of Outlook was important because "nobody in their right mind would try and handle work email inside the standard Mail app—it's just not up to the task." However, both experienced performance issues running the beta on the Tegra 3-based Surface; ExtremeTech concluded that "as it stands, we’re still not sure why you would ever opt to buy a Windows RT tablet when there are similarly priced Atom-powered x86 devices that run the full version of Windows 8."[19][73]
Market relevance and response
[edit]The need to market an ARM-compatible version of Windows was questioned by analysts because of recent developments in the PC industry; both Intel and AMD introduced x86-based system-on-chip designs for Windows 8, Atom "Clover Trail" and "Temash" respectively, in response to the growing competition from ARM licensees. In particular, Intel claimed that Clover Trail-based tablets could provide battery life rivaling that of ARM devices; in a test by PC World, Samsung's Clover Trail-based Ativ Smart PC was shown to have battery life exceeding that of the ARM-based Surface. Peter Bright of Ars Technica argued that Windows RT had no clear purpose, since the power advantage of ARM-based devices was "nowhere near as clear-cut as it was two years ago", and that users would be better off purchasing Office 2013 themselves because of the removed features and licensing restrictions of Office RT.[72][74][75]
Windows RT was also met with lukewarm reaction from manufacturers; in June 2012, Hewlett-Packard canceled its plans to release a Windows RT tablet, stating that its customers felt Intel-based tablets were more appropriate for use in business environments. In January 2013, Samsung cancelled the American release of its Windows RT tablet, the Ativ Tab, citing the unclear positioning of the operating system, "modest" demand for Windows RT devices, plus the effort and investment required to educate consumers on the differences between Windows 8 and RT as reasons for the move. Mike Abary, senior vice president of Samsung's U.S. PC and tablet businesses, also stated that the company was unable to build the Ativ Tab to meet its target price point—considering that lower cost was intended to be a selling point for Windows RT devices.[54] Nvidia CEO Jen-Hsun Huang expressed disappointment over the market performance of Windows RT, but called on Microsoft to continue increasing its concentration on the ARM platform. Huang also commented on the exclusion of Outlook from the Office 2013 suite included on the device and suggested that Microsoft port the software for RT as well (in response to public demand, Microsoft announced the inclusion of Outlook with future versions of Windows RT in June 2013).[20][76] In May 2013, reports surfaced that HTC had scrapped plans to produce a 12-inch Windows RT tablet as it would cost too much to produce, and that there would be greater demand for smaller devices.[77]
The poor demand resulted in price cuts for various Windows RT products; in April 2013 the price of Dell's XPS 10 fell from US$450 US to $300, and Microsoft began offering free covers for its Surface tablet in some territories as a limited-time promotion—itself a US$130 value for the Type Cover alone.[78][79] Microsoft also reportedly reduced the cost of Windows RT licenses for devices with smaller screens, hoping that this could spur interest in the platform.[80] In July 2013, Microsoft cut the price of the first-generation Surface worldwide by 30%, with its U.S. price falling to $350. Concurrently, Microsoft reported a loss of US$900 million due to the lackluster sales of the device.[81][82][83][84][85] In August 2013, Dell silently pulled the option to purchase the XPS 10 from its online store without a keyboard dock (raising its price back up to US$479), and pulled the device entirely in September 2013.[51][86] Microsoft's discount on the Surface tablet did result in a slight increase of market share for the device; in late-August 2013, usage data from the advertising network AdDuplex (which provides advertising services within Windows Store apps) revealed that Surface usage had increased from 6.2 to 9.8%.[87]
Restrictions and compatibility limitations
[edit]In contrast to Windows 8 (where the feature had to be enabled by default on OEM devices, but remain user-configurable), Microsoft requires all Windows RT devices to have UEFI Secure Boot permanently enabled, preventing the ability to run alternative operating systems on them. Tom Warren of The Verge stated that he would have preferred Microsoft to "keep a consistent approach across ARM and x86, though, not least because of the number of users who'd love to run Android alongside Windows 8 on their future tablets", but noted that the decision to impose such restrictions was in line with similar measures imposed by other mobile operating systems, including recent Android devices and Microsoft's own Windows Phone mobile platform.[9][88][89][90]
The requirement to obtain most software on Windows RT through Windows Store was considered to be similar in nature to the application stores on other "closed" mobile platforms; where only software certified under guidelines issued by the vendor (i.e. Microsoft) can be distributed in the store.[91] Microsoft was also criticized by the developers of the Firefox web browser for effectively preventing the development of third-party web browsers for Windows RT (and thus forcing use of its own Internet Explorer browser) by restricting the development of desktop applications and by not providing the same APIs and exceptions available on Windows 8 to code web browsers that can run as apps.[10][32] However, the European Union, in response to a complaint about the restrictions in relation to an antitrust case involving Microsoft, ruled that "so far, there are no grounds to pursue further investigation on this particular issue." As mandated by the EU, the BrowserChoice.eu service is still included in Windows 8.[92]
"Jailbreak" exploit
[edit]In January 2013, a privilege escalation exploit was discovered in the Windows kernel that can allow unsigned code to run under Windows RT; the exploit involved the use of a remote debugging tool (provided by Microsoft to debug WinRT apps on Windows RT devices) to execute code which changes the signing level stored in RAM to allow unsigned code to execute (by default, it is set to a level that only allows code signed by Microsoft to execute).[93] Alongside his explanation of the exploit, the developer also included a personal appeal to Microsoft urging them to remove the restrictions on Windows RT devices, contending that their decision was not for technical reasons, and that the devices would be more valuable if this functionality were available.[94] In a statement, a Microsoft spokesperson applauded the effort, indicating that the exploit does not pose a security threat because it requires administrative access to the device, advanced techniques, and would still require programs to be re-compiled for ARM. However, Microsoft has still indicated that the exploit would be patched in a future update.[95]
A batch file-based tool soon surfaced on XDA Developers to assist users in the process of performing the exploit, and a variety of ported desktop applications began to emerge, such as the emulator Bochs, PuTTY and TightVNC.[93][96][97][98] Afterwards, an emulator known as "Win86emu" surfaced, allowing users to run x86 software on a jailbroken Windows RT device. However, it does not support all Windows APIs, and runs programs slower than they would on a native system.[99]
Demise
[edit]In November 2013, speaking about Windows RT at the UBS Global Technology Conference, Julie Larson-Green made comments discussing the future of Microsoft's mobile strategy surrounding the Windows platform. Larson-Green stated that in the future (accounting for Windows, Windows RT, and Windows Phone), Microsoft was "[not] going to have three [mobile operating systems]." The fate of Windows RT was left unclear by her remarks; industry analysts interpreted them as signs that Microsoft was preparing to discontinue Windows RT due to its poor adoption, while others suggested that Microsoft was planning to unify Windows with Windows Phone.[26][27] Microsoft ultimately announced its "Universal Windows Apps" platform at Build 2014, which would allow developers to create WinRT apps for Windows, Windows Phone, and Xbox One that share common codebases.[100][101][102][103] These initiatives were compounded by a goal for Windows 10 to unify the core Windows operating system across all devices.[104]
Critics interpreted Microsoft's move to cancel the launch of a smaller Surface model in May 2014 as a further sign that Microsoft, under new CEO Satya Nadella, and new device head Stephen Elop (who joined Microsoft upon the purchase of Nokia's mobile phone business in September 2013,[105] only to depart the company the following year[106]), was planning to further downplay Windows RT, given that the company had shifted its attention towards a higher-end, productivity-oriented market with the Pro 3—one which would be inappropriate for Windows RT given its positioning and limitations. Analysts believed that Microsoft was planning to leverage its acquisition of Nokia's device business for future Windows RT devices, possibly under the Lumia brand;[107][108][109]
On January 21, 2015, Microsoft unveiled Windows 10 Mobile, an edition of Windows 10 for smartphones and sub-8-inch tablets running on ARM architecture; unlike RT, which was based upon the user experience of the PC version, Windows 10 on these devices is a continuation of the Windows Phone user experience that emphasizes the ability for developers to create "universal" Windows apps that can run across PCs, tablets, and phones, and only supports the modern-style interface and Windows apps (although on compatible devices, a limited desktop experience will be available when connected to an external display).[110][111][112][113] Following the event, a Microsoft spokesperson stated that the company was working on a Windows RT update that would provide "some of the functionality of Windows 10",[114][115] and the company ended production of both the Surface 2 and Lumia 2520.[66]
Microsoft's purchase of Nokia ultimately turned out to be a failure,[116] and Microsoft would eventually leave the consumer mobile phone market,[117] selling its assets to Foxconn and HMD Global in May 2016.[118]
Newer Intel processors for mobile devices were more competitive in comparison to ARM equivalents in regards to performance and battery life; this factor and other changes made by Microsoft, such as the removal of Windows OEM license fees on devices with screens less than 9 inches in size,[119] spurred the creation of a market for lower-end tablets running the full Windows 8 operating system on Intel-compatible platforms, leaving further uncertainty over Microsoft's support of ARM outside of smartphones—where they remain ubiquitous.[104][120] Such a device came in March 2015, when Microsoft unveiled a new low-end Surface model, the Intel Atom-based Surface 3; unlike previous low-end Surface models, Surface 3 did not use ARM and Windows RT.[121] It was succeeded in 2018 by the Pentium Gold Surface Go.[122]
Windows 8.1 RT Update 3 (KB3033055)[37][123][38] was released on September 16, 2015;[38][124][125] it adds a version of the updated Start menu seen in early preview versions of Windows 10 (which combines an application list with a sidebar of tiles),[38] but otherwise does not contain any other significant changes to the operating system or its functionality, nor any support for Windows 10's application ecosystem.[38] The Verge characterized this update as being similar to Windows Phone 7.8—which similarly backported user interface changes from Windows Phone 8 (which switched from a Windows Mobile-derived platform to one derived from the NT kernel), without making any other significant upgrades to the platform.[126][127]
Impact on Windows 10
[edit]ARM support
[edit]On December 7, 2016, Microsoft announced that as part of a partnership with Qualcomm, it planned to launch an ARM version of Windows 10 for Snapdragon-based devices, initially focusing on laptops. Unlike Windows RT, the ARM version of Windows 10 supports using an emulation layer to run software compiled for 32-bit x86 architectures.[128] The following year, Microsoft announced the Always Connected PC brand, covering Windows 10 devices with cellular connectivity; the launch featured two Snapdragon 835-powered 2-in-1 laptops from Asus and HP, and an integration of Qualcomm's Snapdragon X16 gigabit LTE modem with AMD's Ryzen Mobile platform.[129][130]
Windows 10 S
[edit]On May 2, 2017, Microsoft unveiled Windows 10 S, an edition of Windows 10 designed primarily for low-end mobile devices targeting the education market (competing primarily with Google's Linux-based ChromeOS). Similarly to Windows RT, it restricted software installation to applications obtained via Windows Store.[131][132][133][134] Windows 10 S was replaced by S Mode, a mode in which manufacturers can ship Windows 10 computers with the same restrictions, but they can be turned off by the user.[135]
References
[edit]- ^ "January 10, 2023—KB5022346 (Security-only update)". support.microsoft.com. January 10, 2023.
- ^ "January 10, 2023—KB5022352 (Monthly Rollup)". support.microsoft.com. January 10, 2023.
- ^ a b c "Microsoft Lifecycle Policy - Windows RT". Retrieved April 22, 2022.
- ^ a b "Windows 8.1 has reached end of service". Microsoft Documentation. January 10, 2023. Archived from the original on January 12, 2023. Retrieved January 13, 2023.
- ^ LeBlanc, Brandon (August 1, 2012). "Windows 8 has reached the RTM milestone". Windows Experience Blog. Microsoft.
- ^ a b Gowri, Vivek; Lal Shimpi, Anand (October 25, 2012). "The Windows RT Review". Anandtech.com. Retrieved October 29, 2013.
- ^ Bisson, Simon (January 6, 2011). "CES: Windows to run on ARM chips, says Microsoft". ZDNet. CBS Interactive. Retrieved November 21, 2012.
- ^ a b c Sinofsky, Steven (February 9, 2012). "Building Windows for the ARM processor architecture". Building Windows 8. Microsoft. Retrieved November 21, 2012.
- ^ a b Niccolai, James (January 13, 2012). "Windows 8 on ARM: You can look but you can't touch". Computerworld. IDG. Archived from the original on March 6, 2019. Retrieved January 27, 2012.
- ^ a b c Shankland, Stephen (May 9, 2012). "Microsoft bans Firefox on ARM-based Windows, Mozilla says". CNET. Retrieved October 22, 2012.
- ^ Ziegler, Chris (May 17, 2012). "Microsoft talks Windows Store features, Metro app sandboxing for Windows 8 developers". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved September 8, 2012.
- ^ LeBlanc, Brandon (April 16, 2012). "Announcing the Windows 8 Editions". Blogging Windows. Microsoft. Archived from the original on August 2, 2014. Retrieved April 17, 2012.
- ^ Gara, Tom (October 26, 2012). "What Does the 'RT' In Windows RT Stand For?". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved July 10, 2013.
- ^ Hollister, Sean (October 17, 2012). "With Surface looming, Microsoft fails to explain Windows 8 vs. Windows RT to consumers". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved November 19, 2012.
- ^ Reisinger, Don (September 17, 2012). "Microsoft: Come 'celebrate' Windows 8 on Oct 25". CNET. CBS Interactive. Retrieved September 17, 2012.
- ^ LeBlanc, Brandon. "Mark your calendars for Windows 8.1!". Blogging Windows. Microsoft. Archived from the original on August 15, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2013.
- ^ Covert, Adrian (August 14, 2013). "Windows 8.1 update coming October 18". CNN Money. Time Warner.
- ^ LeBlanc, Brandon (May 14, 2013). "Windows Keeps Getting Better". Blogging Windows. Microsoft. Archived from the original on May 15, 2013. Retrieved May 20, 2013.
- ^ a b Anthony, Sebastian (June 27, 2013). "Windows RT 8.1: Still slow, still plagued by the Desktop, still useless". ExtremeTech. Ziff Davis. Retrieved July 9, 2013.
- ^ a b c Greene, Jay (June 5, 2013). "Outlook finally coming to Windows RT tablets". CNET. CBS Interactive. Retrieved June 5, 2013.
- ^ D'Orazio, Dante (October 19, 2013). "Windows RT 8.1 update taken offline due to installation issues". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved October 19, 2013.
- ^ Chacos, Brad (October 19, 2013). "Microsoft temporarily pulls Windows RT 8.1 update due to 'a situation'". PC World. Retrieved October 20, 2013.
- ^ Newman, Jared (October 19, 2013). "Microsoft releases fix for Surface RT slates borked by Windows RT 8.1 update". PC World. Retrieved October 22, 2013.
- ^ Chacos, Brad (October 22, 2013). "Microsoft fixes Windows RT 8.1 issues, returns update to Windows Store". PC World. Retrieved October 22, 2013.
- ^ a b c Gowri, Vivek; Shimpi, Anand Lal (October 25, 2012). "The Windows RT Review". AnandTech. Retrieved November 2, 2012.
- ^ a b "Microsoft ready to kill Windows RT". The Guardian. November 26, 2013. Retrieved November 29, 2013.
- ^ a b "Microsoft's device chief sees a future without three versions of Windows". The Verge. November 25, 2013. Retrieved November 29, 2013.
- ^ a b "Windows RT won't get full Office 2013". PC Pro. August 8, 2012. Archived from the original on November 4, 2012. Retrieved October 5, 2012.
- ^ "Microsoft Office for Windows RT: How to move to a commercial-use license". ZDNet. Retrieved October 27, 2012.
- ^ "Windows 8.1 includes seamless, automatic disk encryption—if your PC supports it". Ars Technica. October 17, 2013. Retrieved October 18, 2013.
- ^ "Developing a new experience enabled desktop browser". Microsoft. October 22, 2012. Retrieved November 15, 2012.
- ^ a b "Windows 8 browsers: the only Metro apps to get desktop power". TechRadar. March 27, 2012. Retrieved November 13, 2012.
- ^ "Which peripherals work with Windows RT, Surface RT?". ZDNet. Retrieved May 4, 2013.
- ^ "Windows RT hardware compatibility list released by Microsoft". TechRadar. November 2012. Retrieved May 4, 2013.
- ^ "If you're asking, 'why does Windows RT do it like that?' The answer's battery life". ZDNet. Retrieved December 31, 2013.
- ^ "Windows RT vs Windows 8: On the Surface, there's still a lot of confusion". ZDNet. October 24, 2012. Retrieved November 19, 2012.
- ^ a b "Update for Windows RT 8.1 feature improvement". Microsoft. Retrieved September 20, 2015.
- ^ a b c d e f "Windows RT gets a Start menu of its own in Windows RT 8.1 Update 3". Ars Technica. Conde Nast. September 16, 2015. Retrieved September 16, 2015.
- ^ Bott, Ed (November 24, 2012). "Microsoft commits to Surface with Windows RT for at least four years". ZDNet. CBS Interactive. Retrieved May 20, 2013.
- ^ a b c d Tibken, Shara. "How Microsoft became a control freak with tablet makers". CNET. Retrieved January 11, 2013.
- ^ Epstein, Zach (June 20, 2012). "Microsoft's tablet efforts are fleeting, says Acer founder". Boy Genius Report.
- ^ "Microsoft reveals its own Windows 8 tablet: meet the new Surface for Windows RT". Engadget. June 18, 2012. Retrieved June 20, 2012.
- ^ "ARM, Microsoft collaborating on 64-bit Windows version". PC World. Retrieved October 28, 2013.
- ^ Branscombe, Mary (November 16, 2012). "How TI's move out of smartphones into servers highlights chip issues". ZDNet. Retrieved April 9, 2018.
- ^ Iorga, Radu (July 26, 2012). "Dell Could Replace HP As Windows RT Tablet Maker - Tablet News". Tablet News. Retrieved April 9, 2018.
- ^ "Acer delays Windows RT tablets over Surface concerns". BBC News. October 31, 2012. Retrieved January 11, 2013.
- ^ "Microsoft's new iPad rival Surface for Windows RT release date". Eurogamer. July 30, 2012. Retrieved July 30, 2012.
- ^ "Asus Vivo Tab Official Site". Archived from the original on October 14, 2012. Retrieved August 29, 2012.
- ^ Wollman, Dana (October 23, 2012). "ASUS VivoTab RT tablet arrives October 26th, starting at $599 for the 32GB model; keyboard dock included (update: eyes-on!)". Engadget. Retrieved January 8, 2013.
- ^ "Dell announces XPS 10 Windows 8 hybrid, XPS Duo 12 convertible (update: hands-on)". August 30, 2012. Retrieved September 2, 2012.
- ^ a b "Dell no longer selling its XPS 10 Windows RT tablet, wants you to buy the Latitude 10 instead (updated)". Engadget. September 25, 2013. Retrieved September 27, 2013.
- ^ "Lenovo's backflipping 13-inch IdeaPad Yoga will cost $1,099, 11-inch Windows RT version arrives December for $799 (hands-on)". The Verge. October 9, 2012. Retrieved January 27, 2013.
- ^ "Samsung ATIV Tab 10.1 Windows RT tablet announced". August 29, 2012. Retrieved August 29, 2012.
- ^ a b Tibken, Shara. "Uh-oh, Windows RT, Samsung's got second thoughts". CNET. Archived from the original on January 12, 2013. Retrieved January 11, 2013.
- ^ "Samsung ATIV S and ATIV Tab available in the UK tomorrow". Hexus. December 13, 2012. Retrieved January 17, 2013.
- ^ Sakr, Sharif (March 6, 2013). "Samsung will stop sale of Windows RT tablets in Germany due to weak demand, according to reports". Engadget. Retrieved March 13, 2013.
- ^ "Acer waits for Windows RT 8.1 to make tablet decision". InfoWorld. May 3, 2013. Retrieved May 4, 2013.
- ^ "Asus Pulling Back on Windows RT, Chairman Says". AllThingsD. Retrieved August 7, 2013.
- ^ "Asustek Pulls Plug on Windows RT Tablet". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on August 11, 2013. Retrieved August 9, 2013.
- ^ Shah, Agam (October 2, 2013). "With new Venue tablets, Dell signals its PC division is alive and kicking". PC World. IDG. Retrieved October 2, 2013.
- ^ "Nvidia CEO: We're working hard on Surface 2". CNET. Retrieved September 5, 2013.
- ^ "Microsoft announces the Surface 2, the follow-up to the original Surface RT; coming October 22nd for $449". Engadget. September 23, 2013. Retrieved September 23, 2013.
- ^ "Nokia answers the Surface 2 with the Lumia 2520, a beautiful, ultra-mobile Windows RT tablet". The Verge. October 22, 2013. Retrieved October 22, 2013.
- ^ Oliver, Dave (May 15, 2014). "Microsoft Surface 2 4G review". Wired.co.uk. Retrieved April 9, 2018.
- ^ a b Hachman, Mark (January 27, 2015). "Microsoft has stopped making the Surface 2 tablet, spelling trouble for Windows RT". PC World. IDG. Retrieved January 28, 2015.
- ^ a b c Shah, Agam (February 2, 2015). "Is Windows RT dead? Microsoft stops making Nokia Lumia 2520". PC World. Retrieved February 4, 2015.
- ^ Doud, Adam (October 1, 2014). "Thank goodness the Surface Mini was cancelled". Pocketnow. Archived from the original on July 22, 2018. Retrieved April 9, 2018.
- ^ Bowden, Zac (July 30, 2017). "This is Microsoft's canceled Surface Mini (exclusive photos and details)". Windows Central. Retrieved April 9, 2018.
- ^ "Leaked Photo Shows Canceled Microsoft Phones and Nokia 2020 Windows RT Tablet". Softpedia. July 25, 2016. Retrieved August 1, 2016.
- ^ Bowden, Zac (September 27, 2017). "Nokia's canceled Lumia 2020 was a compact Windows RT tablet after my heart". Windows Central. Retrieved April 9, 2018.
- ^ "Asus Vivo Tab RT review". PC Advisor. Retrieved November 2, 2012.
- ^ a b Chacos, Brad. "Why Windows RT is hurtling toward disaster". InfoWorld. Retrieved January 27, 2013.
- ^ "Hands on: Windows 8.1 RT review". TechRadar. June 27, 2013. Retrieved September 11, 2013.
- ^ "Can Intel Challenge ARM's Mobile Dominance?". Great Speculations. Forbes. Retrieved November 22, 2012.
- ^ Bright, Peter (October 24, 2012). "Now that it's here, is there a place for Windows RT?". Ars Technica. Retrieved November 22, 2012.
- ^ "Nvidia CEO disappointed with Windows RT, prays to Outlook god". PC World. Retrieved April 15, 2013.
- ^ "HTC Said to Cancel Large Windows RT Tablet on Weak Demand". Bloomberg.com. Bloomberg. May 30, 2013. Retrieved June 3, 2013.
- ^ "Prices of Windows RT tablets drop, point to failure of OS". PC World. Retrieved April 15, 2013.
- ^ "Windows RT's race to the bottom". InfoWorld. May 15, 2013. Retrieved May 22, 2013.
- ^ "Microsoft Said to Cut Windows for Tablet Prices". Bloomberg.com. Bloomberg. June 3, 2013. Retrieved June 3, 2013.
- ^ Ingraham, Nathan (July 18, 2013). "Microsoft took a $900 million hit on Surface RT this quarter". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved February 8, 2015.
- ^ "Microsoft Misses, Takes a $900 Million Charge on Surface RT Stock". All Things Digital. Retrieved July 25, 2013.
- ^ "Microsoft cuts Surface RT prices by 30 percent worldwide, hopes to boost slow sales". The Verge. July 15, 2013. Retrieved July 25, 2013.
- ^ "Microsoft's Surface Tablet Is Said to Fall Short of Predictions". Bloomberg.com. Bloomberg. March 15, 2013. Retrieved May 21, 2013.
- ^ Lowe, Scott (July 18, 2013). "Microsoft Lost $900 Million on Surface RT in Q1". IGN.com. Retrieved July 20, 2013.
- ^ "Dell drops $299 Windows RT tablet; cheapest deal is now $479". Computerworld. August 17, 2013. Archived from the original on August 20, 2013. Retrieved August 17, 2013.
- ^ "Surface RT usage skyrockets after steep price cuts". PC World. Retrieved December 28, 2013.
- ^ Brodkin, Jon (January 16, 2012). "Microsoft mandating Secure Boot on ARM, making Linux installs difficult". Ars Technica. Condé Nast. Retrieved August 3, 2012.
- ^ Warren, Tom (January 16, 2012). "Windows 8 ARM devices won't have the option to switch off Secure Boot". The Verge. Retrieved August 3, 2012.
- ^ Glyn Moody (January 12, 2012). "Is Microsoft Blocking Linux Booting on ARM Hardware?". Computerworld UK. Archived from the original on March 9, 2012.
- ^ "Microsoft: We Can Remotely Delete Windows 8 Apps". PC World. Archived from the original on May 18, 2013. Retrieved July 10, 2013.
- ^ "EU antitrust regulators let Microsoft limit browsers on Windows RT". PC World. Archived from the original on January 1, 2014. Retrieved December 31, 2013.
- ^ a b "Windows RT jailbroken to run third-party Desktop apps". ExtremeTech. Retrieved March 14, 2013.
- ^ Paul, Ian. "Windows RT can be tweaked to run desktop apps, hacker says". PC World. Retrieved January 8, 2013.
- ^ Whitney, Lance. "Windows RT hack? Don't sweat it, Microsoft says". CNET. Retrieved January 10, 2013.
- ^ Paul, Ian. "Jailbreak tool gives Windows RT tablets desktop-like functions". PC World. Retrieved January 12, 2013.
- ^ "You can jailbreak Windows RT to run desktop apps...or even Mac OS". IT World. Archived from the original on January 14, 2013. Retrieved January 12, 2013.
- ^ "Microsoft declares Windows RT Jailbreak tool is safe, says it 'appreciates the work of researchers'". The Next Web. January 11, 2013. Retrieved January 28, 2013.
- ^ "How to run normal x86 Windows apps on your Windows RT tablet". ExtremeTech. Retrieved December 22, 2013.
- ^ "Microsoft's universal Windows apps run on tablets, phones, Xbox, and PCs". PC World. IDG. Retrieved April 5, 2014.
- ^ "Rejoice! The Start menu is coming back to Windows". PC World. IDG. Retrieved April 2, 2014.
- ^ "Future Windows 8.1 update will finally bring back the Start menu". Ars Technica. April 2, 2014. Retrieved April 5, 2014.
- ^ "One Windows, all devices: The new Microsoft app strategy unveiled". InfoWorld. April 2, 2014. Retrieved April 5, 2014.
- ^ a b "Windows 10 On ARM: 7 Observations". InformationWeek. October 13, 2014. Retrieved November 24, 2014.
- ^ Bort, Julie (September 3, 2013). "Steve Ballmer Tells Employees: 'Stephen Elop Will Be Coming back to Microsoft'". Business Insider. Retrieved April 9, 2018.
- ^ Williams, Owen (June 17, 2015). "Nokia's ex-CEO, Stephen Elop, is leaving Microsoft". The Next Web. Retrieved April 9, 2018.
- ^ "Why the Surface Pro 3 just killed Windows RT". ComputerWorld. May 22, 2014. Archived from the original on August 10, 2014. Retrieved July 24, 2014.
- ^ "What Microsoft didn't announce today: An ARM-based Surface Mini". ZDNet. May 20, 2014. Retrieved July 24, 2014.
- ^ "Windows RT isn't dead -- yet". ComputerWorld. May 20, 2014. Archived from the original on June 30, 2014. Retrieved July 24, 2014.
- ^ "A PC in Your Pocket: Continuum for Windows Phones". Windows IT Pro. Penton. Retrieved May 16, 2015.
- ^ "Your Windows 10 phone can turn into a full PC". The Verge. April 29, 2015. Retrieved April 29, 2015.
- ^ "Microsoft has 'tailored' version of Windows 10 for phones, tablets". CNET. CBS Interactive. Retrieved January 23, 2015.
- ^ Savov, Vlad (January 21, 2015). "Windows 10 makes its phone debut". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved January 21, 2015.
- ^ "Microsoft's Windows RT isn't dead… yet". CNET. CBS Interactive. Retrieved January 21, 2015.
- ^ "Windows 10 will be a free upgrade for Windows 7 and Windows 8 users". PCWorld. IDG. Retrieved January 22, 2015.
- ^ "This is The Reason of Why Lumia Failed". Windows Latest. November 8, 2016. Archived from the original on January 13, 2020. Retrieved April 9, 2018.
- ^ Patrizio, Andy (September 29, 2016). "Microsoft is leaving the consumer mobile market". Network World. Retrieved April 9, 2018.
- ^ Kharpal, Arjun (May 18, 2016). "Nokia phones are back as Microsoft sells mobile assets to Foxconn". CNBC. Retrieved April 9, 2018.
- ^ "Microsoft making Windows free on devices with screens under 9 inches". The Verge. April 2, 2014. Retrieved April 2, 2014.
- ^ "Cheap Windows 8.1 tablets flood the market". InfoWorld. October 14, 2014. Retrieved November 24, 2014.
- ^ "Microsoft's Surface 3 is a $499 tablet that could be a full Windows laptop". The Verge. March 31, 2015. Retrieved March 31, 2015.
- ^ Bohn, Dieter (August 7, 2018). "Microsoft Surface Go review: a little goes a long way". The Verge. Retrieved November 4, 2022.
- ^ "Windows 8.1 RT Update 3". support.microsoft.com. Retrieved April 6, 2021.
- ^ "Microsoft confirms Windows RT will get an update within weeks". TechRadar. Future. Retrieved June 29, 2015.
- ^ Sams, Brad. "Windows RT update 3 is coming in September". Neowin. Neowin LLC. Retrieved July 15, 2015.
- ^ "Windows RT users shouldn't expect much from Update 3, report claims". PC World. IDG. Retrieved July 20, 2015.
- ^ "Upcoming Windows RT update will include new Start menu and lock screen". The Verge. August 9, 2015. Retrieved August 20, 2015.
- ^ "Microsoft is bringing Windows desktop apps to mobile ARM processors". The Verge. Vox Media. December 7, 2016. Retrieved December 8, 2016.
- ^ Howse, Brett (December 5, 2017). "Microsoft Launches Windows 10 On ARM: Always Connected PCs". AnandTech. Retrieved December 5, 2017.
- ^ "AMD and Qualcomm join forces to power higher-end connected PCs". Engadget. December 5, 2017. Retrieved December 5, 2017.
- ^ "Windows 10 S is Microsoft's answer to Chrome OS". The Verge. May 2, 2017. Retrieved May 2, 2017.
- ^ Bright, Peter (September 14, 2016). "Desktop apps make their way into the Windows Store". Ars Technica. Condé Nast.
- ^ "Windows 10 Cloud looks just like Windows 10 in leaked screenshots". The Verge. Vox Media. February 3, 2017. Retrieved March 11, 2017.
- ^ "Leaked Microsoft document confirms Windows 10 Cloud and a Chromebook competitor". PC World. IDG. Retrieved April 23, 2017.
- ^ "Microsoft admits Windows 10 S was confusing, new 'S Mode' upgrades will be free". The Verge. Retrieved March 8, 2018.