Jump to content

Talk:IEEE 802.11b-1999: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Assessment: banner shell, Computing (Rater)
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
I have removed the part where is falsely stated that IEEE was marketed as WIFI around the world. IEEE and wifi consortium
{{WikiProject Computing |importance=Low |network=yes |network-importance=Mid}}
are not the same thing.
{{WikiProject Technology}}

{{WikiProject Electrical engineering |importance=Low}}
Spectrum manager
{{WikiProject Radio|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Telecommunications|importance=Low}}

}}
{{WikiProject Computing|class=start|importance=low|network=yes|network-importance=mid}}


==Talk==
The main article "IEEE 802.11b-1999" mentions ranges of several kilometers, with high gain antennas. This seems very strange, as the regular MAC protocol probably does not support it.
The main article "IEEE 802.11b-1999" mentions ranges of several kilometers, with high gain antennas. This seems very strange, as the regular MAC protocol probably does not support it.
A reference to someone who actually managed to do this is essential here.
A reference to someone who actually managed to do this is essential here.
Anyone who did this probably used a very elusive mode, and also high transmit power and high gain antenna. The high transmit power would be in violation of FCC rules. Any local 802.11b devices may suffer from extreme interferece. Some devices might even be damaged. This high power transmission may even interfere outside of the WIFI band. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/192.91.60.10|192.91.60.10]] ([[User talk:192.91.60.10|talk]]) 10:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Anyone who did this probably used a very elusive mode, and also high transmit power and high gain antenna. The high transmit power would be in violation of FCC rules. Any local 802.11b devices may suffer from extreme interferece. Some devices might even be damaged. This high power transmission may even interfere outside of the WIFI band. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/192.91.60.10|192.91.60.10]] ([[User talk:192.91.60.10|talk]]) 10:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I do not under stand eny of this <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/12.191.216.3|12.191.216.3]] ([[User talk:12.191.216.3|talk]]) 16:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I do not under stand eny of this <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/12.191.216.3|12.191.216.3]] ([[User talk:12.191.216.3|talk]]) 16:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

I have removed the part where is falsely stated that IEEE was marketed as WIFI around the world. IEEE and wifi consortium
are not the same thing.

Spectrum manager <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/69.196.173.65|69.196.173.65]] ([[User talk:69.196.173.65|talk]]) 04:22, 27 February 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

The main WIFI article state that:
'Not every IEEE 802.11-compliant device is submitted for certification to the Wi-Fi Alliance, sometimes because of costs associated with the certification process' SO indeed the statement about 802.11 being marketed as WIFI is a common myth. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/206.248.179.86|206.248.179.86]] ([[User talk:206.248.179.86|talk]]) 13:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->



== "Direct extension of DSSS" ==
== "Direct extension of DSSS" ==
Line 17: Line 27:


[[Special:Contributions/188.58.21.168|188.58.21.168]] ([[User talk:188.58.21.168|talk]]) 22:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/188.58.21.168|188.58.21.168]] ([[User talk:188.58.21.168|talk]]) 22:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

192.168.1.1 [[User:Jefferson ballentes|Jefferson ballentes]] ([[User talk:Jefferson ballentes|talk]]) 18:18, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

remove all access in wifi [[User:Jefferson ballentes|Jefferson ballentes]] ([[User talk:Jefferson ballentes|talk]]) 18:19, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:53, 2 November 2024

Talk

[edit]

The main article "IEEE 802.11b-1999" mentions ranges of several kilometers, with high gain antennas. This seems very strange, as the regular MAC protocol probably does not support it. A reference to someone who actually managed to do this is essential here. Anyone who did this probably used a very elusive mode, and also high transmit power and high gain antenna. The high transmit power would be in violation of FCC rules. Any local 802.11b devices may suffer from extreme interferece. Some devices might even be damaged. This high power transmission may even interfere outside of the WIFI band. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.91.60.10 (talk) 10:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC) I do not under stand eny of this —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.191.216.3 (talk) 16:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the part where is falsely stated that IEEE was marketed as WIFI around the world. IEEE and wifi consortium are not the same thing.

Spectrum manager — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.173.65 (talk) 04:22, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The main WIFI article state that: 'Not every IEEE 802.11-compliant device is submitted for certification to the Wi-Fi Alliance, sometimes because of costs associated with the certification process' SO indeed the statement about 802.11 being marketed as WIFI is a common myth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.248.179.86 (talk) 13:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


"Direct extension of DSSS"

[edit]

What does it mean that it is a direct extension of DSSS? Why not say that it uses DSSS modulation?

188.58.21.168 (talk) 22:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

192.168.1.1 Jefferson ballentes (talk) 18:18, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

remove all access in wifi Jefferson ballentes (talk) 18:19, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]